A SURVEY ON LINE OF MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION BY PRIMARY HEALTH CARE PHYSICIANS IN PUDUDCHERRYHTML Full Text
A SURVEY ONLINE OF MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION BY PRIMARY HEALTH CARE PHYSICIANS IN PUDUCHERRY
M. Thulasimani * 1, S. Amarnath 2, Arun Sharma 2, S. Basalingappa 2, S. Jaikumar 2 and S. Ramaswamy 2
Department of Cardiology 1, Indira Gandhi Government General Hospital & Postgraduate Institute, Puducherry - 605001, Puducherry, India.
Department of Pharmacology 2, Sri Lakshmi Narayana Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry - 605502, Puducherry, India.
ABSTRACT: Hypertension is one of the most important public health problems globally. If the blood pressure is effectively controlled, many of the disastrous complications of hypertension such as myocardial infarction, stroke, kidney failure, heart failure, and death can be prevented or delayed. Patients usually attend the family physicians first for any illness they are suffering, including hypertension. Hence, family physicians who are primary care providers play a major role in the management of hypertension. A survey based on a validated questionnaire was conducted among primary care physicians of Puducherry to assess their current knowledge regarding investigations and pharmacotherapy of hypertension and associated comorbid diseases. Eighty, one primary care physicians, responded. Though, more than 53% of primary care physician favored fundus examination, lipid profile and electrocardiogram as essential investigations, urine for microalbuminuria was favored only by 11.11% of physicians. It is noteworthy that more than 82% of primary care physicians are aware that methyldopa should be the drug of choice for pregnancy-induced hypertension. However, more than 76% of primary care physicians preferred atenolol as an essential drug for hypertension. As beta-blockers, especially atenolol, are no more considered as the first line of drugs in hypertension, there is a need to update the knowledge of current management of hypertension by primary care physicians. From the present survey, it is felt that continuing medical education program on hypertension stressing the importance of assessment of microalbuminuria, fundus examination, lipid profile, electrocardiogram and use of beta blockers should be arranged for primary care physicians so that effective management of hypertension by them can reduce the mortality and morbidity in hypertensive patients significantly.
Hypertension, Primary care physicians, ACE inhibitors, Beta blockers, Fundus examination, Microalbuminuria
INTRODUCTION: Hypertension is the major public health problem causing high mortality and morbidity all over the world.
Effective control of blood pressure (BP) can bring down the disastrous consequences of hypertension significantly. It has been shown that even a slight decrease of BP of 2 mmHg reduces the risk of stroke by 15% and the risk of coronary artery disease by 6% 1.
However, the BP control rate remains suboptimal not only in developing countries like India but also elsewhere. Primary care physicians (PCPs) have a major role in diagnosing and managing hyper-tension globally because patients often approach them first for any ailment. Hence, it is essential that PCPs should be aware of the diagnosis, recent development in pharmacotherapy of hypertension, and comorbidities.
Improvement of their knowledge and attitude about hypertension will improve the care of hypertensive patients and reduce the serious complications of the same. It has been observed by one of the authors (M.T) that many practicing physicians in India are not fully aware of the current concept of hypertension and are in a dilemma regarding uses of certain antihypertensive drugs. In many of the scientific meetings on ‘Updates on antihypertensive agents,’ the PCPs expressed confusion over the recent controversy to use beta-blockers as the first line of treatment though it was in the mainstay for the past 30 years. A similar situation prevails over the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). This necessitated the initiation of a survey to be conducted on the line of management of hypertension by PCPs and hence the present study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Cross-sectional survey was conducted with a validated questionnaire among family physicians of the union territory of Puducherry from 15th October 2013 to 20th February 2014. The questionnaire was administered to 81 practicing family physicians randomly selected across Puducherry.
The salient feature of the questionnaire included the information regarding awareness, diagnosis, investigations required, therapy, choice of drugs, ‘P’ drugs, management of hypertension with diabetes mellitus, pregnancy and with a focus on pharmacoeconomic aspects.
The practicing physicians were explained about the purpose of the study, and informed consent was obtained. They were requested to complete the questionnaire which was collected. The data were analyzed and presented in the results.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The results reveal that 61.72% of physician felt three consecutive measurements of blood pressure is necessary for diagnosing hypertension. Thus, it appears they are following the correct strategy for diagnosing hypertension. About investigation suggested for hypertensive patients, 20.98% felt that fundus examination should be done.
Lipid profile was insisted by 12.3% only, 2.46 % of physicians felt that electro cardiogram (ECG) alone is enough. It is nice to note a combination of the above three investigations was favored by 53.08% of physicians. Only 11.11% of physicians felt that urine should be tested for microalbuminuria Table 1. Fundus examination is a simple and easily accessible investigation which can indicate the prognosis and severity of hypertension and suggest appropriate treatment. It is surprising to note that only 20.98% of physicians gave importance to fundus examination. As fundus examination indicates arteriolar damage occurring elsewhere 2, it is important to make family physicians realize that fundus examination should be included while managing hypertension.
Lipid profile was favored by only 12.3% of physicians. It is to be pointed out here that the rate of the concurrence of hypertension and dyslipidemia is remarkably high. It has been reported that half of the patients with hypertension also had some form of dyslipidemia, and about half of patients with dyslipidemia will be found to have hypertension 3. Clinical trials have also demonstrated the value of treating both hypertension and dyslipidemia in preventing myocardial infarction and stroke 4. Hence, it is essential that PCPs should be educated over the importance of investigating dyslipidemia in hypertensive patients.
ECG remains an important clinical tool for detecting left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Further, it is an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality 5. Hence, hypertensive patients who have ECG evidence of LVH should be treated aggressively. ECG is a simple, easily accessible noninvasive investigation, but unfortunately, this survey indicates that almost half of practicing physicians are not aware of the significance of taking ECG in hypertensive patients. About the treatment of hypertensive patients in the clinic, only 28.39% of physicians felt that they could treat themselves. A significant proportion of physicians preferred a referral to a specialist.
TABLE 1: THE OPINION OF PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIANS ON VARIOUS ASPECTS OF MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION
|1||Factors help to decide that the patient is suffering from hypertension||A. Occipital headache||14.81|
|B. Emotional outputs||1.23|
|C. Three Consecutive BP||61.72|
|D. All of the above||22.22|
|2||Investigations suggested to hypertensive patients||A. Fundus examination||20.98|
|B. Lipid profile||12.3|
|D. Urine for microalbuminuria||11.11|
|E. Fundus examination + Lipid profile +ECG||53.08|
|3||Opinion on the treatment of hypertensive patients in a clinic or referring to specialty||A. Will treat my self||28.39|
|B. Will refer to specialty||9.87|
|C. Will treat if only mild||11.11|
|D. Will refer if only complicated||50.61|
|5||Use of atenolol as an antihypertensive agents||Yes||76.54|
|6||Most preferred drug of choice for treatment of hypertension associated with diabetes||A. Calcium channel blockers||7.40|
|B. ACE inhibitors||82.71|
|C. Angiotensin Receptor Blockers||9.87|
|7||Preferred drug of choice for treatment of pregnancy-induced hypertension||A. Alpha methyl dopa||86.41|
|8||Considered as cheapest anti-hypertensive drug among the 3 drugs||A. Amlodipine||32.09|
|B. Thiazide diuretics||60.49|
|9||Considered as costliest anti-hypertensive drug among the 3 drugs||A. Losartan||11.11|
It is submitted that hypertension is a global disease, and about 15 % of the population is suffering from hypertension. In a developing country like India, it may not be possible to approach cardiologists for the treatment of hypertension by all. Hence, more widespread treatment of hypertension is needed. Primary care physicians have a major role in this regard. Therefore, they should be self-equipped with the knowledge in managing hypertension and its associated complications. The present survey reveals that PCPs need continuing medical education (CME) programs on updating their knowledge on the management of hypertension and its complications.
Regarding the treatment with anti-hypertensive drugs, 41.97% opined that they are using a combination of drugs. As a monotherapy 20.98% of physicians preferred ACEIs, and 17.28% preferred calcium channel blockers (CCBs). Beta blockers were preferred monotherapy by 11.11% of physicians.
Surprisingly thiazide diuretics were the first line of treatment for only 7.4% of physicians Fig. 1.
FIG. 1: PREFERENCE OF ANTI-HYPERTENSIVE DRUGS AMONG PHYSICIANS (PERCENT)
This is in contrast to the guideline of the seventh report of the joint national committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of high blood pressure (JNC 7) where thiazide diuretics were recommended as initial treatment 6.
When enquired the reason for not favoring thiazide diuretics as an initial choice, most of the physicians opined that thiazides can cause fatal or near fatal hyponateremia and hypokalemia; additionally, it can cause impotence, increase in plasma levels of LDL cholesterol and above all, the risk of precipitating diabetes. Further, one physician informed that when he prescribed thiazide diuretic to some patients, they come back to him informing that the medicine is not easily available and they have to run for at least 7 or 8 medical shops to get the medicine.
It appears that the apprehension of these doctors about the use of thiazide diuretics is justified. Perhaps, the fact that thiazides are the cheapest antihypertensive drugs, which may be one of the reasons for recommending as an initial treatment by JNC7 given life long therapy.
The preference for the use of CCBs and ACEIs and combination therapy by a significant number of PCPs appears to be reasonable. It is also to be appreciated that ARBs were considered by only one primary care physician in comparison with ACEIs, which were preferred by 17 physicians. This may be based on the view that ARBs are threefold costlier, despite equi-effective. Such a pattern of prescription shall improve patients’ adherence.
Beta-blockers, especially atenolol, has had the reputation of safe, effective drugs for the treatment of hypertension for the past 40 years ever since they were introduced and atenolol was the most widely used beta blocker. Given the observed higher incidence of cardiovascular mortality and stroke with atenolol treatment, its use is very much limited now. Concern has been raised recently about the safety of use of atenolol in hypertension 7, 8.
From our study, it appears that most of the practicing physicians are unaware of these adverse effects of atenolol as 76.54 % of them prefer to use atenolol. The reason perhaps that they are using the drug for 2 – 3 decades with good control of blood pressure and it is the cheapest of all beta blockers.
Further, the fact that it allows once-daily dose, which improves patient compliance might be yet another factor for considering prescribing atenolol. The recent recommendation that beta blockers should not remain as the first line of anti-hypertensive therapy in patients without coronary disease necessitates the need of updating the knowledge on the use of beta blockers in hypertension by PCPs 9.
A reduction in total cardiovascular events in those who were treated with amlodipine than those who were on atenolol was also observed 10. Further, it was considered that beta blockers produce a pseudo antihypertensive effect (failure to lower central aortic pressure) and lack effect on regression of target end organ like left ventricular hypertrophy. With these adverse effects, the use of beta-blockers as the first-line drug has to be reconsidered 11 and supports our contention that knowledge of PCPs on these lines requires reinforcement.
About the most preferred drug for the treatment of hypertension associated with diabetes, it is noteworthy that 82.71 % of physicians are prescribing ACEIs (Table 1). The delay in progress to microalbuminuria and better fibrinolytic capacity with ACEI, decrease the risk of recurrent myocardial infarction. Additionally, improved insulin sensitivity and glycemic control by ACEIs reduce the incidence of stroke – brain attack similar to heart attack apart from its beneficial action on myocardial infarction 12 (Table 1).
The observation that alpha methyldopa has been preferred as a drug of choice by 86.41 % indicates the physicians are aware that this drug still considered the standard drug of choice for hypertension with pregnancy. An insignificant proportion of 2.46 % preferred ACEI, which are contra indicated in pregnancy because of the risk of fetal renal failure and associated mortality 13.
Hypertension requires lifelong therapy, and it is imperative that the physician should consider pharmacoeconomic aspects while prescribing the drugs, especially in developing countries like India. However, compromise should not be made on the quality of the treatment.
The survey results reveal that the PCPs are aware of the cost of the drugs, thus utilizing this information while prescribing anti-hypertensive drugs for better compliance in patients belonging to a lower socioeconomic status group.
CONCLUSION: There is a compelling situation that PCPs need to manage hypertensive patients with or without co-morbidities on their own. To achieve this, an up to date knowledge on the therapy of hypertension to the PCP needs to be imparted.
The present survey reveals that the majority of PCPs are aware of the diagnosis and appropriate therapy for hypertension associated with comorbidities. However, a significant proportion requires an update on these lines. The estimated cost of treatment of hypertension and its consequences, which include stroke, MI, kidney failure, and heart failure will be a burden worldwide. If hypertension had been better controlled, many of these cardiovascular events would have been prevented or delayed, and death would have been avoided.
The PCPs have a definite role in controlling hypertension as already mentioned, it is the primary care physicians who are approached first by the patients. Therefore, professional bodies like Association of family physicians, hospitals and medical institutes have a moral duty in updating the knowledge of family physicians by arranging continuing medical education (CME) courses which is the need of the hour.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Nil
- Madhur MS: Hypertension Treatment and management. Medscapr reference drug, disease and procedures. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/241381-treatment
- Foguet Q, Rodriguez A, Saez M, Ubieto A, Beltran M, Barcelo MA and Coll G: VAMPAHICA Study Group. The usefulness of optic fundus examination with retinography in the initial evaluation of hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens 2008; 21(4): 400-5.
- Selby JV, Peng T and Karter AJ: High rates of co-occurrence of hypertension, elevated low-density lipo-protein, cholesterol and diabetes mellitus in a large mana-ged care population. Am J Manag Care 2004; 10: 163-70.
- Borghi C. Interactions between hypercholesterolemia and hypertension: implications for therapy. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2002; 11: 489-96.
- Sund Strom J, Lind L and Arnlov J: Echocardiographic and electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy predict mortality independently of each other in a population of elderly men. Cir 2001; 103: 2346-51.
- http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/hypertension/jnc7full.pdf ( last accessed: 16-03-14)
- Aronow WS: Current role of beta-blockers in the treatment of hypertension. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2010; 11(16): 2599-07.
- Carlberg B, Samuelsson O and Lindholm LH: Atenolol in hypertension: is it a wise choice? The Lancet 2004; 364: 1684-89.
- Banglore S, Mwsswrli FM, Kostis JB and Pepine CJ: Cardiovascular protection using beta-blockers: a critical review of the evidence. J Am Col Car 2007; 50(7): 563-72
- Nesto RW and Zarich S: Acute myocardial infarction in diabetes mellitus: lessons learned from ACE inhibition. Circulation 1998; 97(1): 12-5.
- Benowitz NL: Anti-Hypertensive agents in: Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. Eds Katzung BG, Masters SB, Trevor AJ. Lange Tata Mc Graw Hill Education Private Limited. New Delhi 2009: 167-89.
How to cite this article:
Thulasimani M, Amarnath S, Sharma A, Basalingappa S, Jaikumar S and Ramaswamy S: A survey online of management of hypertension by primary health care physicians in Puducherry. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2014; 5(10): 4315-19. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.5(10). 4315-19.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
M. Thulasimani *, S. Amarnath, A. Sharma, S. Basalingappa, S. Jaikumar and S. Ramaswamy
Department of Cardiology, Indira Gandhi Government General Hospital & Post graduate Institute, Puducherry, India.
24 March 2014
30 April 2014
11 July 2014
01 October 2014