A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY ON SELF-MEDICATION FOR COVID-19 AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS AMONG ADULTS IN A RESIDENTIAL COLONY OF EAST DELHI
HTML Full TextA CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY ON SELF-MEDICATION FOR COVID-19 AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS AMONG ADULTS IN A RESIDENTIAL COLONY OF EAST DELHI
Anjali Mongjam, Prithpal Singh Matreja, Reeta Devi * and Mongjam Meghachandra Singh
School of Health Sciences, Indira Gandhi National Open University, Maidan Garhi, New Delhi, India.
ABSTRACT: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 140 study subjects in an urban residential area of East Delhi selected by simple random sampling method to assess the prevalence of self-medication for Covid-19 and associated socio-demographic and economic factors. Data were collected by interviewing the study subjects using a pre-tested semi-structured interview schedule. The Mean+SD age of the study subjects was 41.89+13.54 years (range: 20 to 75 years); 77 (55.0%) were males, and 75.7% were graduates and above. There were 86 with a Covid-19 positivity history. The prevalence of self-medication among them was 33.7% (95% CI: 23.9%, 44.7%), least in 30-39 years (5.9%, 95% CI: 0.1%, 28.7%), maximum in 40-49 years (44.4%, 95% CI: 21.5%, 69.2%) (p=0.101), higher in females (38.1%, 95% CI: 23.6%, 54.4%) than males (29.5%, 95% CI: 16.7%, 45.2%) (p=0.402), socioeconomic class III (52.4%, 95% CI: 29.8%, 74.3%) and least among class I (20.0%, 95% CI: 9.6%, 34.6%) (p=0.017). Self-medication was not associated with education level, working status and marital status. Prevalence of self-medication was high during the first episode of Covid-19 (39.7%, 95% CI: 28.5%, 51.9%) (p=0.005); higher with mild (47.1%, 95% CI: 32.9%, 61.5%), than with moderate Covid-19 severity (12.9%, 95% CI: 3.6%, 29.8%) (p=0.006). Medicines for self-medication were Vitamin C (82.8%), Zinc (69.0%), Paracetamol 500 mg (62.1%), Azithromycin (31.0%), Ivermectin (27.6%), Doxycycline (24.1%). The common reasons for self-medication were: information from friends/relatives (86.2%), chemist/ pharmacist (58.6%), social media (41.4%) etc. The chemist shops were commonest source of getting medicines for self-medication (82.8%).
Keywords: Self-medication prevalence, Covid-19, Ivermectin, Zinc
INTRODUCTION: In December 2019, there were reports of few cases of unidentified pneumonia having high fatality, originating from Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, Wuhan, China. The signs and symptoms were similar to viral flu such as fever, cough, diarrhoea, fatigue, vomiting.
The causative agent was later identified as the SARS-Cov-2 virus. Some cases were severe, causing respiratory distress, heart injury and secondary infection 1, 2. This disease is now recognized as Covid-19, which was declared as pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020 3.
Covid-19 led to a wide range of physical and mental health problems. There was a mass fear called " Coronaphobia " characterized by mass hysteria, anxiety, irritability, confusion, insomnia, denial, despair, fear of getting the disease, depression, substance dependence, suicidal thoughts and post-traumatic stress disorder 4. The Covid-19 pandemic has triggered a general lock-down in most parts of the world. It has left the general public to resort to self-care, self-help and self-medicate. This has been worsened due to the infodemic of fake news related to the prevention and management of the pandemic of Covid-19. The vast exposure to news in the media, social media and internet has resulted in people adopting the practice of self-medication 5. Self-medication is the practice of consuming medicinal products for treatment and surveillance of self-diagnosed symptoms in the absence of physician’s advice 6. Self-medication can be in the form of over-the-counter drugs or use of traditional medicine in the form of home remedies 7. Self-medication may lead to delay in seeking health care resulting in economic loss. It can lead to drug interaction and use of antibiotics can lead to antimicrobial resistance 8, 9. A systematic review by Quincho-Lopez et al reported that in the general population self-medication prevalence ranged between <4% to 88.3% to prevent or manage Covid-19. The most widely used medicines included antibiotics, chloroquine, acetaminophen, vitamins or supplements, ivermectin and ibuprofen 10.
Few community-based studies have reported on the prevalence and associated factors regarding self-medication during Covid-19. Nasir M et al in Bangladesh, among high socioeconomic and educated citizens observed that 88.3% used self-medication like Ivermectin (77.15%, Azithromycin (54.15%), doxycycline (40.25%) etc 11. Wegbom et al. from Nigeria reported the prevalence of self-medication in the population with males and having knowledge on self-medication as associated factors 12. Prevalence of self-medication in Covid-19 was 34.2% in Togo, with vitamin C and traditional medicines as commonly used products 13. There is paucity of information on self-medication for Covid-19 in India. Hence, this study was planned with the following objectives (1) to assess the prevalence of self-medication for Covid-19 among adult population and (2) to find out socio-demographic and economic factors associated with self-medication for Covid-19 during the pandemic.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a population-based descriptive cross-sectional observational study conducted over a period of two months (August-September 2022). It was conducted in Dilshad Garden, J and K pocket, East Delhi. A list of 709 households was available in the residential colony with the Residents Welfare Association (RWA) for the sampling frame.
The sample size was calculated based on 41% prevalence of self-medication reported by Wegbom et al. 12, with 8.2% absolute precision, using the formula
N = Zα2pq / L2
(Where N= sample size, Zα = 1.96, p= Prevalence, q=100-p, L = precision, 20% of p=8.2%). The sample size was 138. Considering 10% non-response, it was 152.
Sampling Method: A total of 152 households were selected by simple random sampling method out of the 709 households using random number generator web: calculator.net. In each household, one adult (18 years and above) was selected by the lottery method. If the person was not interested, another adult based on lottery from the remaining was selected. This process was continued to choose one participant from the household. If none was interested then the household was not selected. Inclusion criteria was an adult aged 18 years and above giving consent for the study and exclusion criteria was any person with severe illness, unable to give response to questions.
Verbal permission for data collection was obtained from Resident Welfare Association. Home visits to selected households collected data. Selected adult by lottery method was interviewed using a pre-tested, validated semi-structured interview schedule after getting written informed consent and giving participant information sheet in English / Hindi. The study tool consisted of items related to socio-demographic economic characteristics such as age, gender, education level, occupation, marital status, total family income per month, number of family members, questions related to awareness about Covid-19, prevention, treatment and control measures, source of information, history of Covid-19 (based on self-report or available health card with investigative report), medication intake (prescribed or self-medication) during the Covid-19 pandemic for Covid-19, reasons for self-medication if any, source of medicines, any adverse effects, hospitalization for Covid-19, etc. The interview schedule was translated into Hindi and retranslated to English for language accuracy by a Hindi and English translator. The study subjects were educated about the possible adverse effects of self-medication for avoidance in the future.
Data Analysis: Data were entered and analyzed using SPSS 25 version. Qualitative variables were expressed in percentage; quantitative data were expressed as Mean+SD, median (Interquartile range). Prevalence of self-medication use was expressed in percentage (95% confidence interval). The chi-square test was used for the association of socioeconomic variables with prevalence of self-medication. Univariate analysis was done to identify associated factors with self-medication. The ‘p’ value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Modified B.G. Prasad classification for May 2021 was used for socioeconomic classification 14.
The study was conducted after ethical clearance from Institutional Review Board, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Moradabad (reference no IRB/74/2022). Study subjects were included after written informed consent, and no coercion was done to include them. They were given education about the possible harmful effects of self-medication.
RESULT: The cross-sectional study was conducted among 140 study subjects in a community-based setting in a residential area of East Delhi. The mean age was 41.89+13.54 years, a median of 41 years (IQR: 29.25 years to 52.75 years), ranging from 20 to 75 years.
It was seen that 77 (55.0%) of the participants were males, whereas 63 (45.0%) of the study participants were females. It was further seen that 75.7% of the participants were graduates and post-graduates in educational qualifications. Out of 140, 89 individuals reported covid-19 positivity (63.6%) and were contacted for self-medication for Covid-19 during the pandemic.
Prevalence and Associated Factors of Self-Medication: Out of 86 with a history of Covid-19 positivity, 29 (33.7%, 95% CI: 23.9%, 44.7%) took self-medication. This includes 4 who consulted a doctor but were not prescribed any medication due to the mild asymptomatic nature of Covid-19. Table 1 shows the association of socio-economic-demographic and other factors with self-medication among study subjects. The prevalence of age-specific self-medication was least in 30-39 years age group (5.9%, 95% CI: 0.1%, 28.7%). The prevalence of age-specific self-medication was maximum in 40-49 years age group (44.4%, 95% CI: 21.5%, 69.2%). However, the prevalence of age-specific self-medication across the age groups was not statistically significant (p=0.101).
Gender-specific prevalence of self-medication also did not show significant differences between males (29.5%, 95% CI: 16.7%, 45.2%) and females (38.1%, 95% CI: 23.6%, 54.4%) (p=0.402).
The prevalence of self-medication showed significant differences between various socioeconomic classes; the highest prevalence was seen in socioeconomic class III (52.4%, 95% CI: 29.8%, 74.3%) and least among class I (20.0%, 95% CI: 9.6%, 34.6%) (p=0.017). The prevalence of self-medication did not differ significantly between families having 1-4 members (31.5%, 95% CI: 21.1%, 43.4%) and families having members 5-8 (46.2%, 95% CI: 19.2%, 74.8%) (p=0.303).
The educational level of the study subjects did not have any significant association with the prevalence of self-medication. Prevalence of self-medication was reported to be higher (36.2%, 95% CI: 24.9%, 48.7%) among those educated graduate and above level than those educated below graduate level (23.5%, 95% CI: 6.8%, 49.9%). The difference was not significant (p=0.321).
The occupation among the study subjects was also not associated with the prevalence of self-medication. The prevalence of self-medication was 27.3%, (95% CI: 16.1%, 40.9%) among those in job working both in Government and private sector, and it was 45.2% (95% CI: 27.3%, 63.9%) among those not working (p=0.09).
The prevalence of self-medication was higher among single or unmarried study subjects (60.0%, 95% CI: 26.2%, 87.8%) than married study subjects (30.3%, 95% CI: 20.2%, 41.8%) but not statistically significant (p=0.06).
TABLE 1: ASSOCIATION OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC-DEMOGRAPHIC AND OTHER FACTORS WITH SELF-MEDICATION AMONG STUDY SUBJECTS (N=86)
Variables | Self- medication | Total | X2, df, ‘p’ value | |
Yes No. (%) (95% CI) | No No. (%) | No. (%) | ||
Age group (years) | ||||
20-29 | 7 (41.2) (18.4,67.1) | 10 (58.8) | 17 (100.0) | 7.75, 4, 0.101 |
30-39 | 1 (5.9) (0.1,28.7) | 16 (94.1) | 17 (100.0) | |
40-49 | 8 (44.4) (21.5,69.2) | 10 (55.6) | 18 (100.0) | |
50-59 | 9 (40.9) (17.2,59.3) | 13 (59.1) | 22 (100.0) | |
>/60 | 4 (33.3) (9.9,65.1) | 8 (66.7) | 12 (100.0) | |
Gender | ||||
Male | 13 (29.5) (16.7,45.2) | 31 (70.5) | 44 (100.0) | 0.73, 1, 0.402 |
Female | 16 (38.1) (23.6,54.4) | 26 (61.9) | 42 (100.0) | |
Socio economic status | ||||
Class I (>/ Rs.7863) | 9 (20.0) (9.6,34.6) | 36 (80.0) | 45 (100.0) | 8.20, 2, 0.017 |
Class II (Rs.3931-7862) | 9 (45.0) (,45.5) | 11 (55.0) | 20 (100.0) | |
Class III (Rs.2359-3930) | 11 (52.4) (29.8,74.3) | 10 (47.6) | 21 (100.0) | |
Total family size | ||||
1-4 | 23 (31.5) (21.1,43.4) | 50 (68.5) | 73 (100.0) | 1.05, 1, 0.303 |
5-8 | 6 (46.2) (19.2,74.8) | 7 (53.8) | 13 (100.0) | |
Educational level | ||||
Below graduation | 4 (23.5) (6.8,49.9) | 13 (76.5) | 17 (100.0) | 0.98, 1, 0.321 |
Graduate and above | 25 (36.2) (24.9,48.7) | 44 (63.8) | 69 (100.0) | |
Occupation | ||||
Working | 15 (27.3) (16.1,40.9) | 40 (83.7) | 55 (100.0) | 2.83, 1, 0.09 |
Not working | 14 (45.2) (27.3,63.9) | 17 (54.8) | 31 (100.0) | |
Marital status | ||||
Married | 23 (30.3) (20.2,41.8) | 53 (69.7) | 76 (100.0) | 3.49, 1, 0.06 |
Single or unmarried | 6 (60.0) (26.2,87.8) | 4 (40.0) | 10 (100.0) |
The prevalence of self-medication among study subjects according to severity and number of episodes of Covid-19 is shown in Table 2. All the 29 study subjects had taken self-medication during the first episode of Covid-19, and none took it during the second episode of the infection. The prevalence of self-medication in the first episode of Covid-19 (39.7%, 95% CI: 28.5%, 51.9%) was significantly higher than in the second episode (0.0%) (p=0.005). Similarly, the prevalence of self-medication was highest among those with mild Covid-19 (47.1%, 95% CI: 32.9%, 61.5%) and least among those with moderate severity of Covid-19 infection (12.9%, 95% CI: 3.6%, 29.8%). The difference in the prevalence of self-medication across the severity categories of Covid-19 was statistically significant (p=0.006).
TABLE 2: PREVALENCE OF SELF-MEDICATION AMONG STUDY SUBJECTS ACCORDING TO SEVERITY AND NUMBER OF EPISODES OF COVID-19
Variables | Self-medication for Covid-19 | Total | X2, df, ‘p’ value | |
Yes No (%) (95%CI) | No No (%) | No (%) | ||
Number of episodes of Covid-19 | ||||
One | 29 (39.7) (28.4, 51.8) | 44 (60.3) | 73 (100.0) | 7.79, 1, 0.005 |
Two | 0 (0.0) | 13 (100.0) | 13 (100.0) | |
Severity of Covid-19 | ||||
Mild | 24 (47.1) (32.9,61.5) | 27 (52.9) | 51 (100.0) | 10.20, 2, 0.006 |
Moderate | 4 (12.9) (3.6,29.8) | 27 (87.1) | 31 (100.0) | |
Severe | 1 (25.0) (0.6,80.6) | 3 (75.0) | 4 (100.0) |
Frequency for Self-medication Drugs: Table 3 shows the distribution of various medicines taken by 29 study subjects as a part of self-medication about the duration of intake. Medicines for self-medication among 29 study subjects were Vitamin C (82.8%), followed by Zinc (69.0%), Paracetamol 500 mg (62.1%), Azithromycin (31.0%), Ivermectin (27.6%), Doxycycline (24.1%). Only one each took Chloroquine, Prednisolone. The median duration of intake of these medicines was 3 or 5 days with a range varying from 3 days to 10 days. Paracetamol was taken for a median duration of 3 days (IQR 3, 5 days), Azithromycin, and Ivermectin were taken for a median of 3 days (IQR 3, 3). The median duration of intake for Vitamin C, Zinc, and Doxycycline was 5 days (IQR 5, 5 days). Out of 29, 5 (17.3%) also took Ayurvedic medicines including Coronil and 4(13.8%) others took herbal preparations (Giloyi, Kadha) as a part of self-medication for Covid 19. The median duration of intake was 7 days (IQR 3, 10 days). The medicines were perceived to be effective by 26/29 (89.7%).
TABLE 3: MEDICINES TAKEN FOR SELF-MEDICATION BY STUDY SUBJECTS IN RELATION TO DURATION OF INTAKE
Medicines | Dose | No (%) n=29 | Median (IQR) duration in days | Duration range in days |
Vitamin C | 500 mg | 24 (82.8) | 5(5,5) | 3,10 |
Zinc | 50 mg | 20 (69.0) | 5(5,5) | 3,5 |
Paracetamol | 500 mg | 18 (62.1) | 3(3,5) | 3,5 |
650 mg | 7 (24.1) | 3(3,5) | 3,5 | |
Azithromycin | 500 mg | 9 (31.0) | 3(3,3) | 3,3 |
Ivermectin | 12 mg | 8 (27.6) | 3(3.3) | 3,3 |
Doxycycline | 100 mg | 7 (24.1) | 5(5,5) | 3,5 |
Chloroquine | 250 mg | 1 (3.4) | 3* | |
Prednisolone | 15 mg | 1 (3.4) | 5* | |
Others | ||||
Ayurvedic medicine including Coronil | 5 (17.3) | 7(3,10) | 3,15 | |
Herbal products (Giloyi, Kadha) | 4 (13.8) | 7(3,10) | 3,15 |
*Not Median since single subject.
The reasons for self-medication among 29 study subjects are shown in Table 4. It was observed that 25/29 (86.2%) got information about the medicines from friends and relatives. Chemists/Pharmacists also played a role in telling them about the medicines (58.6%). Information from social media (41.4%), television/radio (27.6%) and websites (17.2%) also played role in getting the medicines. In only 2 (6.9%), advice by health worker/Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA)/nurse prompted self-medication. One (3.4%) took self-medication due to financial constraints to consult a doctor.
TABLE 4: REASONS FOR TAKING SELF-MEDICATION AMONG STUDY SUBJECTS
Reasons* | Number (%) N=29 |
Got information from friends/relatives | 25 (86.2) |
Told by chemist/pharmacist | 17 (58.6) |
Information from social media | 12 (41.4) |
Got information from TV/radio | 8 (27.6) |
Got information from website | 5 (17.2) |
Advised by health worker/ ASHA/Nurse | 2 (6.9) |
Financial constraint to consult doctor | 1 (3.4) |
*Multiple responses, mutually not exclusive.
The adverse effects reported among 29 subjects taking self-medication were: skin rashes (34.5%), nausea (24.1%), pain in the abdomen (20.7%), loss of appetite (17.2%), vomiting (13.8%), loose motion (6.9%) and one (3.4%) each of change in urine colour and gas in the stomach. The commonest source of getting medicines for self-medication was from the chemist shop (82.8%) followed by friends/relatives giving the medicines (31.0%) and availability at home (3.4%). This is shown in Fig. 1.
FIG. 1: SOURCE OF GETTING MEDICINES FOR SELF-MEDICATION (N=29)
The money spent on self-medication ranged from Rs.100 to Rs.1000, mean was Rs 914.28+ Rs.1796.02, and median was Rs 500 [Inter quartile range (IQR): Rs.500, Rs 800].
DISCUSSION:
Prevalence and Associated Factors of Self-medication: In the present study, out of 86 with Covid 19 positivity, 29 (33.7%, 95% CI: 23.9%, 44.7%) took self-medication. This is similar to that reported by Sadio et al. in Togo (34.2%) 13, Amuzie et al. (30.3%) in Nigeria 15, Joseph et al. in Mangalore (34.2%) 16, Okoye et al. in Nigeria (36.3%) 17; higher than by others viz. Chopra et al. in Greater NOIDA (25%) 18, Sharma et al. from Mumbai (16.8%) 19, Sujan et al. from Bangladesh (11%) 20; lower than that reported by Nasir et al. in Dhaka (88.3%) 11, Likhar (73.8%) 21, Patel et al. in Maharashtra (43%) 7, Rafiq et al. (67.3%) 22, Sarkar et al. from Bengaluru (65%) 23, Roy et al. (>80% in urban area) 24, Shah et al. from Gujarat (78.3%) 25. These differences could be related to differences in the study areas, population, selection method of study subjects, and method of data collection.
The prevalence of age-specific self-medication was least in 30-39 years age group (5.9%, 95% CI: 0.1%, 28.7%), maximum in 40-49 years (44.4%, 95% CI: 21.5%, 69.2%) (p=0.101). Amuzie et al., Okoye et al., Quispe-Canari et al. also found that older age was associated with higher self-medication 15, 17, 26.
In contrast, few studies reported a higher prevalence of self-medication among younger age (Shah et al., Kumar et al., Seng et al.) 25, 27, 28. Seng et al. reported that lower prevalence in older age could be due to cognitive decline and physical impairment 28.
In the present study, the prevalence of self-medication was higher in females (38.1%, 95% CI: 23.6%, 54.4%) than in males (29.5%, 95% CI: 16.7%, 45.2%) but not significant (p=0.402). A similar finding was reported by Sadio et al., Sharma et al., and Seng et al. 13, 19, 28 In contrast, other studies reported a higher prevalence of self-medication in males (Wegbom et al., Sarkar et al.) 12, 23. However, Sujan et al. from Bangladesh reported no difference in the prevalence of self-medication by gender or age 20.
The highest prevalence of self-medication was seen in socioeconomic class III (52.4%, 95% CI: 29.8%, 74.3%) and least among class I (20.0%, 95% CI: 9.6%, 34.6%) (p=0.017). Poverty has been identified as a factor of self-medication 29. However, Sujan et al. from Bangladesh reported no difference in the prevalence of self-medication in different socio economic groups 20.
The present study observed that the prevalence of self-medication was reported to be higher among graduates and above (36.2%, 95% CI: 24.9%, 48.7%) than those educated below the graduate level (23.5%, 95% CI: 6.8%, 49.9%), but not significant (p=0.321). Higher education level were found to be associated with self-medication by others (Sadio et al., Shah et al. Kumar et al., Ahmad et al.) 13, 25, 27, 30 Other studies, in contrast, showed an association with lower education (Amuzie et al., Jamhour et al.) 15, 31.
Employment status influences the prevalence of self-medication. In the present study, the prevalence of self-medication was 27.3%, (95% CI: 16.1%, 40.9%) among those in job (Government and private sector); and it was higher viz. 45.2% (95% CI: 27.3%, 63.9%) among those not working but not significant (p=0.09). Quispe-Canari et al., on the contrary, found a higher association with employed 26.
The prevalence of self-medication was higher among single or unmarried study subjects (60.0%, 95% CI: 26.2%, 87.8%) than married study subjects (30.3%, 95% CI: 20.2%, 41.8%) but not statistically significant (p=0.06). Shah et al. also found an association of marital status with self-medication 25.
The prevalence of self-medication in the first episode of Covid 19 (39.7%, 95% CI: 28.5%, 51.9%) was significantly higher than in the second episode (0.0%) (p=0.005). There is scanty information on this aspect.
The prevalence of self-medication was significantly higher among those with mild Covid-19 (47.1%, 95% CI: 32.9%, 61.5%) and least among those with moderate severity of Covid-19 infection (12.9%, 95% CI: 3.6%, 29.8%) (p=0.006). There is a paucity of information on this aspect. The reason could be milder infection not requiring treatment and lesser consultation of doctors coupled with symptomatic relief from medicines obtained by self from a pharmacist or chemist shops.
Medicines for self-medication among 29 study subjects were Vitamin C (82.8%), Zinc (69.0%), Paracetamol 500 mg (62.1%), Azithromycin (31.0%), Ivermectin (27.6%), Doxycycline (24.1%). Only one each took Chloroquine and Prednisolone. It is alarming that these medicines, except Vitamin C, and Paracetamol are not over-the-counter drugs requiring physician prescription.
Others have reported antimalarials such as Hydroxychloroquine / Chloroquine, Vitamin C as self-medicated (Quincho-Lopez et al., Sadio et al, Amuzie et al, Okoye et al., Quispe-canari et al., Dutta et al.,) 10, 13, 15, 17, 26, 32. Antibiotics such as Ciprofloxacin, Azithromycin, Doxycycline has been reported for self-medication by Amuzie et al, Okoye et al., Sujan et al., Likhar et al., Shah et al., Quispe-Canari et al., Rather et al., Ahmad et al., Jamhour et al.and Dutta et al. 15, 17, 20, 21, 25, 26, 29-32.
Drugs such as Ivermectin, Zinc have also been reported to be self-medicated during Covid-19 pandemic without any scientific basis by several authors (Quincho-Lopez et al, Okoye et al, Sujan et al and Dutta et al) 10, 17, 20, 32.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as Paracetamol, Ibuprofen has been most widely used as these are available over the counter in the pharmacies. It is substantiated by reports from studies by Quincho-Lopez et al, Joseph et al, Chopra et al, Sujan et al, Sarkar et al, Shah et al, Kumar et al and Ahmad et al 10, 16, 18, 20, 23, 25, 27, 30.
Study subjects have also taken herbal medicines, traditional medicine (Ayurveda, Homeopathy). Others have reported similar finding (Sadio et al-10.2%, Amuzie et al-30.3%,) 13, 15.
The median duration of intake of these medicines was 3 or 5 days (ranging from 3 to 10 days). The median duration of consuming the drugs were: Paracetamol 3 days (IQR 3,5 days), Azithromycin, and Ivermectin for 3 days (IQR 3,3), for Vitamin C, Zinc, Doxycycline: 5 days (IQR 5,5 days).
The Common Reasons for taking self-medication were: information from friends/relatives (86.2%), told by chemist/ pharmacist (58.6%), information from social media (41.4%), television/radio (27.6%) and websites (17.2%), financial constraints to consult doctor (3.4%). Other reasons have been reported such as fear of isolation, stigmatization (Amuzie et al) 15; emergency illness, delay in hospitals, near to pharmacy by Wegbom et al 12 advertisements by mass media, social media, internet (Joseph et al, and Ahmad et al); 16, 30 told by a pharmacist or easy availability in pharmacy (Sharma et al); 19 previous experience, familial treatment, mild illness (Sisay et al) 33. The common adverse effects reported from self-medication were: skin rashes (34.5%), nausea (24.1%), pain in the abdomen (20.7%), loss of appetite (17.2%), vomiting (13.8%), loose motion (6.9%) etc. The commonest source of getting medicines for self-medication was from the chemist shop (82.8%), from friends/relatives (31.0%) and availability at home (3.4%). Chemist /pharmacist as the source of self-medication has been reported by Sharma et al., Shah et al. and Ahmad et al. 19, 25, 30.
CONCLUSION: The present study showed the prevalence of self-medication among subjects with Covid-19 positivity was 33.7% (95% CI: 23.9%, 44.7%), with no significant differences between age groups, gender, educational level, employment status, or marital status. It was significantly higher in the first episode of Covid-19, mild infection. The most commonly used drugs for self-medication were Vitamin C, Zinc, Paracetamol, Azithromycin, Ivermectin, and Doxycycline. The most common reasons for self-medication were getting information from friends/relatives, chemist/ pharmacist, social media, television/radio and websites. The commonest source of getting medicines for self-medication was from the chemist shop (82.8%).
There is a need for a mass awareness campaign on a war footing to educate the general public about the harmful effects of self-medication and monitoring of drug use including education and involvement of pharmacist in preventing self-medication.
Limitations of the Study: The study was conducted in an urban residential colony of Delhi, Hence, the findings of the study cannot be generalized to the general population across all socioeconomic groups. The findings are based on self-report and available medical reports. The findings should be used with caution and reporting bias cannot be ruled out.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The authors gratefully acknowledge the Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, for awarding Short term studentship award (Reference ID: 2022-09962) for conducting this study.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: The authors declare no conflict of interest
REFERENCES:
- Wang L, Wang Y, Ye D and Liu Q: Erratum to ``A review of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) based on current evidence’’ [International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 55/6 (2020) 105948]. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2020; 56(3): 106137.
- Mizumoto K, Kagaya K and Chowell G: Effect of a wet market on coronavirus disease (COVID-19) transmission dynamics in China 2019–2020. Int J Infect Dis 2020; 97: 96–101.
- Cucinotta D and Vanelli M: WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Bio Medica Atenei Parm 2020; 91(1): 157–60.
- Dubey S, Biswas P, Ghosh R, Chatterjee S, Dubey MJ and Chatterjee S: Psychosocial impact of COVID-19. Diabetes MetabSyndr Clin Res Rev 2020; 14(5): 779–88.
- Tasnim S, Hossain MM and Mazumder H: Impact of Rumors and Misinformation on COVID-19 in Social Media. J Prev Med Pub Health 2020; 53(3): 171–4.
- Badiger S: Self‐medication patterns among medical students in South India. Australas Med J 2012; 5(4): 217–20.
- Patel SR, Pimpale DH and Raje SS: Trends in the use of home-remedies and over-the-counter drugs during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study 2021; 52(3): 8.
- Hughes CM, McElnay JC and Fleming GF: Benefits and Risks of Self Medication: Drug Saf 2001; 24(14): 1027–37.
- Ganguly NK, Arora NK, Chandy SJ, Fairoze MN, Gill JPS and Gupta U: Rationalizing antibiotic use to limit antibiotic resistance in India. Indian J Med Res 2011; 134: 281–94.
- Quincho-Lopez A, Benites-Ibarra CA, Hilario-Gomez MM, Quijano-Escate R and Taype-Rondan A: Self-medication practices to prevent or manage COVID-19: A systematic review. Aslam MS, editor. PLOS ONE 2021; 16(11): 0259317.
- Nasir M, Chowdhury ASMS and Zahan T: Self-medication during COVID-19 outbreak: a cross sectional online survey in Dhaka city. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol 2020; 9(9): 1325.
- Wegbom AI, Edet CK, Raimi O, Fagbamigbe AF and Kiri VA: Self-Medication Practices and Associated Factors in the Prevention and/or Treatment of COVID-19 Virus: A Population-Based Survey in Nigeria. Front Public Health 2021; 9: 606801.
- Sadio AJ, Gbeasor-Komlanvi FA, Konu RY, Bakoubayi AW, Tchankoni MK and Bitty-Anderson AM: Assessment of self-medication practices in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak in Togo. BMC Public Health 2021; 21(1): 58.
- Majhi M and Bhatnagar N: Updated B.G Prasad’s classification for the year 2021: consideration for new base year 2016. J Fam Med Prim Care 2021; 10(11): 4318.
- Amuzie CI, Kalu KU, Izuka M, Nwamoh UN, Emma-Ukaegbu U and Odini F: Prevalence, pattern and predictors of self-medication for COVID-19 among residents in Umuahia, Abia State, Southeast Nigeria: policy and public health implications. J Pharm Policy Pract 2022; 15(1): 34.
- Joseph N, Colaco SM, Fernandes RV, Krishna SG and Veetil SI: Perception and self-medication practices among the general population during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in Mangalore, India. Curr Drug Saf [Internet]. 2022 May 13 [cited 2022 Oct 3]; 17. Available from: https://www.eurekaselect.com/204719/article
- Okoye OC, Adejumo OA, Opadeyi AO, Madubuko CR, Ntaji M and Okonkwo KC: Self medication practices and its determinants in health care professionals during the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic: cross-sectional study. Int J Clin Pharm 2022; 44(2): 507–16.
- Chopra D, Bhandari B, Sidhu J, Jakhar K, Jamil F, Gupta R. Prevalence of self-reported anxiety and self-medication among upper and middle socioeconomic strata amidst COVID-19 pandemic. J Educ Health Promot 2021; 10(1): 73.
- Sharma H, Patil AD and Tetarbe T: Knowledge, attitude and practice of self-medication during covid-19 pandemic: a questionnaire based study. European J Pharmaceutical Med Res 2021: 8(5): 562-568.
- Sujan MSH, Haghighathoseini A, Tasnim R, Islam MS, Salauddin SM, Hasan MM and Uddin MR: Self-medication Practices and Associated Factors among COVID-19 Recovered Patient to Prevent Future Infections: AWeb-based Survey in Bangladesh. Biomed Res Ther 2022; 8(1): 36.
- Likhar S, Jain K and Kot L: Self-medication practice and health-seeking behavior among medical students during COVID 19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. MGM J Med Sci 2022; 9(2): 189.
- Rafiq K, Nesar S, Anser H, Leghari Q ul A, Hassan A and Rizvi A: Self-Medication in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Survival of the Fittest. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2021; 1–5.
- Sarkar A and Rajamani JK: Assessment of Psychology, Behaviour and Self-Medication Potential Among Indian People During CovID-19 Pandemic. Biomed Pharmacol J 2021; 14(4): 2285–94.
- Roy D, Tripathy S, Kar SK, Sharma N, Verma SK and Kaushal V: Study of knowledge, attitude, anxiety & perceived mental healthcare need in Indian population during COVID-19 pandemic. Asian J Psychiatry 2020; 51: 102083.
- Shah H and Arora B: Knowledge, attitude, and prevention of self-medication practices among the general population of Gujarat. Indian J Med Sci 2021; 74: 22–6.
- Quispe-Cañari JF, Fidel-Rosales E, Manrique D, Mascaró-Zan J, Huamán-Castillón KM and Chamorro–Espinoza SE: Self-medication practices during the COVID-19 pandemic among the adult population in Peru: A cross-sectional survey. Saudi Pharm J 2021; 29(1): 1–11.
- Kumar V, Mangal A, Yadav G, Raut D and Singh S: Prevalence and pattern of self-medication practices in an urban area of Delhi, India. Med J Dr Patil Univ 2015; 8(1): 16.
- Seng JJB, Yeam CT, Huang CW, Tan NC and Low LL: Pandemic related Health literacy – A Systematic Review of literature in COVID-19, SARS and MERS pandemics [Internet]. Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS); 2020 May [cited 2022 Oct 3]. Available from: http://medrxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2020.05.07.20094227
- Rather IA, Kim BC, Bajpai VK and Park YH: Self-medication and antibiotic resistance: Crisis, current challenges, and prevention. Saudi J Biol Sci 2017; 24(4): 808–12.
- Ahmad MS, Shakeel D and Qadri ZL: Self-medication practices during covid-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2021; 80–2.
- Jamhour A, El-Kheir A, Salameh P, Hanna PA and Mansour H: Antibiotic knowledge and self-medication practices in a developing country: A cross-sectional study. Am J Infect Control 2017; 45(4): 384–8.
- Dutta S, Kaur R, Bhardwaj P, Ambwani S, Godman B and Jha P: Demand of COVID-19 medicines without prescription among community pharmacies in Jodhpur, India: Findings and implications. J Fam Med Prim Care 2022; 11(2): 503.
- Sisay M, Mengistu G and Edessa D: Epidemiology of self-medication in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 2018; 19(1): 56.
How to cite this article:
Mongjam A, Matreja PS, Devi R and Singh MM: A cross-sectional study on self-medication for Covid-19 and associated factors among adults in a residential colony of East Delhi. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2023; 14(7): 3428-36. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.14(7).3428-36.
All © 2023 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
22
3428-3436
578 KB
18805
English
IJPSR
Anjali Mongjam, Prithpal Singh Matreja, Reeta Devi * and Mongjam Meghachandra Singh
School of Health Sciences, Indira Gandhi National Open University, Maidan Garhi, New Delhi, India.
devireeta@gmail.com
09 November 2022
14 December 2022
01 May 2023
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.14(7).3428-36
01 July 2023