A STUDY TO EVALUATE THE PATTERN OF PRE ANAESTHETIC MEDICATION IN VARIOUS SURGICAL SPECIALTIES IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL
HTML Full TextA STUDY TO EVALUATE THE PATTERN OF PRE ANAESTHETIC MEDICATION IN VARIOUS SURGICAL SPECIALTIES IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL
Pritam Biswas*1, Niveditha 2 and M.C Shivamurthy 1
Department of Pharmacology, M.S. Ramaiah Medical College 1, M.S.R.I.T Post, Bangalore-5600054, Karnataka, India
Department of Pharmacology, ESIC-MC & PGIMSR 2, Bangalore-560010, Karnataka, India
ABSTRACT:
Objective: To analyse and compare pattern of pre anaesthetic medication use in various surgical specialties.
Methodology: Data was collected retrospectively from inpatient records of major surgeries in the Department of Surgery, Orthopaedics, Neurosurgery, Paediatric Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Plastic surgery, Urology and Vascular Surgery at M.S. Ramaiah Hospitals, during the period of January 2012 to June 2012. Descriptive analysis was used to analyse the data .SPSS version 19 was used for analysis of data.
Results: 752 pre anaesthetic records were analysed, the most frequently used pre anaesthetic medications, in the order of frequency among antianxiety drug is alprazolam (15.6%),followed by midazolam (7.6%),among opioid analgesics fentanyl (5.9%) followed by sufentanyl (0.1%),among antiemetic drugs ondansetron (57.3%),followed by ramosetron (22.8%) and metoclopromide (18.8%) , among gastro protective pantoprazole (74.6%),followed by ranitidine (11.9%), rabeprazole (8.3%),esomeprazole (2.9%) and glycopyrrolate was the only anticholinergic used .
Conclusion: Our study gives an insight into the current practice pattern of anaesthetists for pre medication in various surgical specialties in a tertiary care hospital. . It also points out areas of potential drug interactions and the need for a practice protocol for the choice of pre anaesthetic medications, its dosing and timing of administration.
Keywords: |
Preanaesthetic medication, Practice pattern
INTRODUCTION:The preoperative period is a stressful experience for majority of the patients undergoing surgery 1.
Historically the rationale for preoperative medication arose from the need to minimize the side effects of anaesthetics.
However, in the current practice the major objective of pre anaesthetic medication is to ensure comfort of the patient and make the experience of anaesthesia and surgery less traumatic and minimize the associated side effects 2.
The pre anaesthetic medication correlates with various outcomes like duration of post-operative recovery, post-operative analgesia requirement and hospital stay.
Yet literature on the current pattern of use of premedication is not well documented and limited to few British and American Surveys 3.
Studying the pattern of use gives an insight into the current practice of anaesthetists and help in recognizing areas of improvement 3. The primary objective is to analyse and compare pattern of use of pre anaesthetic medication in various surgical specialities.
METHODOLOGY: Data was collected retrospectively from inpatient records of those who have undergone major surgeries in the Department of Surgery, Orthopaedics, Neurosurgery, Paediatric Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Plastic surgery, Urology and Vascular Surgery at M.S. Ramaiah Hospitals, during the period of January 2012 to June 2012.
A predesigned proforma was used for each record to collect data on the type of pre anaesthetic medication, dosage, time of administration.
Sample Size: Sample size was estimated based on previous study conducted by Leevetal et al which describes the pattern of premedication in the United States.
A sample size of 750 records was required to get a power of 80 % and α error of 5%.
Statistical Analysis: Descriptive analysis was used to analyse the data .SPSS version 19 was used for analysis of data. Qualitative variables were expressed as a percentage.
RESULTS: 752 pre anaesthetic records were analysed, the mean age was 40.13±19.28 years.63.2% were male and 36.8% were female. 49.5% of screened patients underwent general anaesthesia, 47.9% spinal anaesthesia and 2.1% underwent brachial plexus block with general anaesthesia.
TABLE 1: PATIENT’S DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS
Total number of records | 752 | |
Age Mean (SD) | 40.13(19.28) years | |
Gender | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
Male | 475 | 63.2 |
Female | 277 | 36.8 |
TABLE 2: DISTRIBUTION OF CASES AMONG VARIOUS SURGICAL SPECIALITIES
Orthopaedics | Ob. G | Surgery | Urology | ENT | Vascular surgery | Plastic surgery | Paediatric surgery | Neuro
Surgery |
Total | |
Frequency
(n) |
101 | 87 | 76 | 85 | 47 | 62 | 162 | 58 | 74 | 752 |
Percent
(%) |
13.4 | 11.6 | 10.1 | 11.3 | 6.3 | 8.2 | 21.5 | 7.7 | 9.8 | 100.0 |
Anxiolytic Medication: Alprazolam (15.6%) was the most commonly used by anaesthetists followed by midazolam (7.6%) and 76.8% did not receive any medication.
Among the eight surgical departments surveyed, the anxiolytics were most extensively used by Paediatric surgery, orthopaedics, general surgery and OB & G (Table 3).
FIG 1: ANTIANXIETY DRUGS
TABLE 3: PATTERN OF USE OF ANXIOLYTICS PREOPERATIVELY IN VARIOUS SURGICAL SPECIALITIES
Department | Choice of anxiolytic | ||
No. drug used | Alprazolam | Midazolam | |
Orthopaedics | 60.0% | 29.0% | 11.0% |
OB&G | 74.7% | 3.4% | 21.8% |
Surgery | 64.5% | 28.9% | 6.6% |
Urology | 85.9% | 14.1% | 0.0% |
E.N.T | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Vascular surgery | 87.1% | 12.9% | 0.0% |
Plastic surgery | 81.5% | 12.3% | 6.2% |
Paediatric surgery | 39.7% | 39.7% | 20.7% |
Neurosurgery | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Alprazolam: Dose: Adults -0.5mg, Children -0.25mg .Route: Oral. Time: 2 hours before surgery. Midazolam: Dose: Adults -2g, Children-1g. Route i.v. Time 2 hours before surgery. |
Opioid analgesics: Among the preoperative opioid analgesics prescribed, Fentanyl was the most commonly prescribed followed by sufentanyl [Fig. 2]. 5.9% of the 752 surveyed were prescribed fentanyl, 0.1 % was given sufentanyl.
In our survey, only 3 departments used opioids prior to induction, among them the highest use was noted in plastic surgery followed by orthopaedics and general surgery (Table 4).
FIG. 2: OPIOID ANALGESICS
TABLE 4: PATTERN OF USE OF OPIOID ANALGESICS PREOPERATIVELY IN VARIOUS SURGICAL SPECIALTIES
Department | No Drug use | Fentanyl | Sufentanyl |
Orthopaedics | 93.1% | 5.9% | 1.0% |
OB&G | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
General Surgery | 96.0% | 4.0% | 0.0% |
Urology | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
E.N.T | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Vascular surgery | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Plastic surgery | 78.4% | 21.6% | 0.0% |
Paediatric surgery | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Neurosurgery | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Fentanyl: Dose-25μg.Route-i.v.Time -1/2 hr before surgery. Sufentanyl: Dose- 6μg.Route-i.v.Time -1/2 hr before surgery. |
Antiemetics: The most commonly used antiemetic was ondansetron (57.3%) followed by ramosetron (22.8%) and metoclopramide (18.8%) [fig. 3]. Antiemetics were given preoperatively to all surgical patients, except in 1.1 % who underwent DJ stenting under spinal anaesthesia. The pattern of use of each drug in various surgical departments is represented in Table 5.
FIG. 3: ANTIEMETICS
TABLE 5: PATTERN OF USE OF ANTIEMETICS POSTOPERATIVELY IN VARIOUS SURGICAL SPECIALTIES
Department | No drug used | Ondansetron | Ramosetron | Metoclopramide |
Orthopaedics | 0.0% | 74.7% | 10.1% | 15.2% |
OB&G | 0.0% | 50.0% | 9.3% | 40.7% |
Surgery | 0.0% | 80.3% | 6.6% | 13.2% |
Urology | 9.4% | 52.9% | 17.6% | 20.0% |
E.N.T | 0.0% | 48.9% | 38.3% | 12.8% |
Vascular surgery | 0.0% | 48.4% | 37.1% | 14.5% |
Plastic surgery | 0.0% | 72.8% | 16.0% | 11.1% |
Paediatric surgery | 0.0% | 60.3% | 19.0% | 20.7% |
Neurosurgery | 0.0% | 0.0% | 74.3% | 25.7% |
Ondansetron: Dose-4mg.Route-i.v.Time -1/2 hour before surgery. Ramosetron: Dose-100μg.Route-oral.Time -1/2 hour before surgery. Metoclopramide: Dose-10mg.Route-i.v.Time -1/2 hour before surgery. |
Gastro protective: It is routine practice to prescribe an antacid prior to induction to decrease the volume of gastric acid and the pH and also to prevent aspiration, the most commonly prescribed was Pantoprazole (74.6%) followed by ranitidine (11.9%), rabeprazole (8.3%) and esomeprazole (2.9%). The pattern of uses of these individual drugs is depicted in Table 6.
FIG. 4: GASTROPRTECTIVE
TABLE 6: PATTERN OF USE OF GASTROPROTECTIVE DRUGS IN VARIOUS SURGICAL SPECIALTIES
Department | No drug used | Pantoprazole | Rabeprazole | Esomeprazole | Ranitidine |
Orthopaedics | 0.0% | 83.8% | 5.1% | 0.0% | 11.1% |
OB&G | 1.2% | 70.6% | 11.8% | 0.0% | 16.5% |
Surgery | 0.0% | 84.2% | 7.9% | 0.0% | 7.9% |
Urology | 2.4% | 47.1% | 23.5% | 0.0% | 27.1% |
E.N.T | 27.7% | 36.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 36.2% |
Vascular surgery | 1.6% | 43.5% | 0.0% | 35.5% | 19.4% |
Plastic surgery | 0.0% | 93.8% | 3.7% | 0.0% | 2.5% |
Paediatric surgery | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Neurosurgery | 0.0% | 77.0% | 20.3% | 0.0% | 2.7% |
Pantoprazole: Dosage-40mg.Route-i.v.Time-1/2 hour before surgery. Rabeprazole: Dosage-20mg.Route-i.v.Time-1/2 hour before surgery. Esomeprazole: Dosage-20mg.Route-i.v.Time-1/2 hour before surgery. Ranitidine: Dosage-50mg.Route-i.v.Time-1/2 hour before surgery. |
Anticholinergics: Anticholinergic drugs are administered to decrease respiratory secretions and to prevent bradycardia, in our study i.m. Glycopyrrolate was the only anticholinergic drug administered, in patients who underwent general anaesthesia.
DISCUSSION: From our audit of pre anaesthetic medication in various surgical specialities we found that there is a great variability in utilization of these drugs among the different departments.
Premedication for anxiolysis is important in children and the elderly and has importance in emergence agitation in these groups of patients 4. In the present study we found that Oral alprazolam was the most commonly used followed by IV midazolam and was extensively used in Paediatric surgery, General surgery, Orthopaedics and Obstetrics and gynaecology. This pattern of utilization correlates with the fact that the patients of the above departments are children, women and patients of trauma, who have an increased incidence of anxiety states prior to elective surgery and anaesthesia . These findings differ from the study of Zeev N. Kain et al where the most commonly used anixiolytic is IV midazolam 3.
Alprazolam as well as Midazolam have a additive effect with intravenous anaesthetics (propofol, fentanyl) and could prolong the sedative effects after surgery 5, 6. Therefore a dose reduction of pre-operative alprazolam should be considered.
Preoperative opioid analgesics were used in only 3 departments; they were most extensively used in Plastic surgery followed by orthopaedics and surgery. Fentanyl was most commonly used; only one patient was given sufentanyl. These findings were similar to previous studies where fentanyl was the most common opioid analgesic used 2, 3. The additive sedative effects of fentanyl and iv general anaesthetics warrants a dose reduction of fentanyl preoperatively.
In our study IM Glycopyrrolate was the only anticholinergic used in all patients who underwent general anaesthesia when compared to Zeev N and R K Mirakur et al where Atropine was the most commonly used 2, 3. Glycopyrolate being a quaternary amine, it is less likely to cause adverse CNS effects when compared to atropine. It has a lesser incidence of cardiac arrhythmias 7, 8 and has a specific effect of decreasing airway secretions ,therefore it is the most preferred anticholinergic in current practice.
Among the antiemetic drugs, ondansetron was most commonly used followed by ramosetron and metroclopramide. A study by Y. Fuji et al shows that antiserotonins (ondansetron, granisetron, ramosetron) are more effective in prophylaxis of PONV than traditional antiemetics (metoclopramide, droperidol) for 24 hours post-surgery 9. A meta-analysis by T Mihara shows that ramonsetron is superior to ondansetron for preventing PONV 10.This could explain the pattern of usage of antiemetics .
Pantoprazole was the most commonly used followed by ranitidine, rabeprazole and esomeprazole. The findings of the present study are contradictory to a meta-analysis by Clark K et al, which is of the opinion that H2 blockers are more effective in reducing the gastric volume and pH compared to a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), therefore prevent aspiration to a greater extent 11.
Some of the strengths of our study include a broad view of the current practice of premedication in a tertiary hospital of south India and our sample size of 752 cases had a power 80 %. Some of the limitations in the present study are that it was a retrospective study with data that was collected from patient records, so we could not evaluate postoperative endpoints. Our data represents the urban population of Bangalore and may not correspond to the anaesthetic practices of the rural areas of South India.
Studies of potential drug interactions of pre anaesthetic medications with the intravenous agents used for anaesthesia and the effect of such interactions on postoperative outcomes (PONV, duration of post-operative sedation, analgesia, dryness of the mouth, emergent anxiety states) needs to be looked into, so that definitive practice protocol can be made for the choice of pre anaesthetic medications, its dosing and timing of administration.
CONCLUSION: Our study gives an insight into the current practice pattern of anaesthetists for pre medication in various surgical specialities in a tertiary care hospital. It also points out areas of potential drug interactions and the need for a practice protocol for the choice of pre anaesthetic medications, its dosing and timing of administration.
REFERENCES:
- Abdalla C, Hannalla R: Premedication of the child undergoing surgery. M.E.J. ANESTH. 2011; 21(202):165–76.
- R K Mirakhur: Preanaesthetic medication : a survey. J. R. Soc. Med. 1991; 84(August):481–3.
- Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Bell C, Hofstadter MB, Rimar S, Weisman S: Premedication in the United States: A Status Report. Anesth Analg 1997; 84:427-32). 1997; 84:427–32.
- Kain ZN, Caldwell-Andrews AA., Krivutza DM, Weinberg ME, Wang S-M, Gaal D: Trends in the Practice of Parental Presence During Induction of Anesthesia and the Use of Preoperative Sedative Premedication in the United States, 1995-2002: Results of a Follow-Up National Survey. Anesth. Analg. 2004 May; 98:1252–9.
- Short TG, Chui PT: Propofol and midazolam act synergistically in combination. Br. J. Anaesth. 1991 Nov; 67(5):539–45.
- Twyman RE, Rogers CJ, and Macdonald RL: Differential regulation of gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor channels by diazepam and phenobarbital. Ann. Neurol. 1989 Mar; 25(3):213–20.
- Kongsrud F, Sponheim S: A comparison of atropine and glycopyrrolate in anaesthetic practice. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 1982 Dec; 26(6):620–5.
- Heller J, Taylor P: Muscarinic Receptor Agonists and Antagonists. Goodman Gilman’s "The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics". 12th ed. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc; 2012; 196–7.
- Fujii Y: Prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients scheduled for breast surgery. Clin. Drug Investig. 2006 Jan; 26(8):427–37.
- Mihara T, Tojo K, Uchimoto K, Morita S, Goto T: Reevaluation of the effectiveness of ramosetron for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth. Analg. 2013 Aug; 117(2):329–39.
- Clark K, Lam LT, Gibson S, Currow D: The effect of ranitidine versus proton pump inhibitors on gastric secretions: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Anaesthesia. 2009 Jun; 64(6):652–7.
How to cite this article:
Biswas P, Niveditha and Shivamurthy MC: A study to evaluate the pattern of pre Anaesthetic medication in various surgical specialties in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Int J Pharm Sci Res2014; 5(6): 2441-46.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.5(6).2441-46
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
46
2441-2446
439KB
1335
English
IJPSR
Pritam Biswas*, Niveditha and M.C Shivamurthy
Tutor and Postgraduate MD Student, 38,3rd cross, Vivekanandanagar, P.O. Maruthi Sevanagar, Bangalore – 560033, Karnataka, India
dr.pritambiswas@gmail.com
08 January, 2014
03 March, 2014
12 May, 2014
http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.5(6).1000-05
01, June 2014