ANALYSIS OF PHYTOCHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS, ANTI-MICROBIAL ACTIVITY AND MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF MEDICINAL WEED SONCHUS OLERACEUS L. USING RAPD MARKER
HTML Full TextANALYSIS OF PHYTOCHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS, ANTI-MICROBIAL ACTIVITY AND MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF MEDICINAL WEED SONCHUS OLERACEUS L. USING RAPD MARKER
Sumeet Parkash Kaundal *, Anshul Sharma and Saurabh Kulshrestha
Faculty of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Bajhol, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India.
ABSTRACT: In present study, Himalayan weed Sonchus oleraceus extracts are screened for the occurrence of bioactive compounds, anti-microbial activity, and its molecular characterization using RAPD. The agar well diffusion method was used to detect anti-microbial activity of aqueous, methanol, chloroform and ethyl acetate extracts of S. oleraceus. The anti-microbial activity of different extract was checked at different concentrations i.e. at 150mg/ml, 200mg/ml, 250mg/ml and 300mg/ml against five bacteria namely Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhi. The anti-microbial activity of the different extracts of S. oleraceus was associated with the concentration. In phytochemical screening alkaloids, flavonoids, protein, carbohydrates, tannins, phenol, terpenoids and saponins were confirm in different extracts. The primers OPA-1, OPA-9, OPA-16, TC-1 and TC-3 were used in molecular characterization using RAPD against 14 samples collected from five districts namely Kangra, Una, Bilaspur, Hamirpur and Solan of Himachal Pradesh. Cluster analysis revealed that isolates H1 and H3, H2 and S2, U1 and U2 were showing maximum homology. In comparison to all the isolates, isolate K1 from the Kangra district showed least homology to all the other isolates from total covered five districts of Himachal Pradesh.
Keywords: RAPD, Antimicrobial, Bioactive compounds, Cluster analysis and S. oleraceus
INTRODUCTION: The name Sonchus oleraceus was given in 1753 by Carolus Linnaeus. Sonchus is the Greek name for sow thistle, meaning a hollow stem, and epithet oleraceus mean kitchen vegetable. It is considered as one of the medicinal weeds in more than 55 countries 1.
Commonly, Sonchus oleraceus is known as Dodak in Hindi, Sow thistle in English, Naayi Hakkarike in Kannada, Pathari in Marathi, Ratrinta in Telugu, Osithagarai in Tamil and Titaliya in Bihar 2.
oleraceus is native to Europe, North Africa and West Asia and then spread to North and South America, India, China, Southern Australia 3. There are a significant number of invasive species in diverse environments in various districts of Himachal Pradesh, such as wastelands, protected areas, farmland, reserve forests, river banks, etc. 4-8, 10. S. oleraceus is one of the medicinal invasive alien plants having the ability to establish, invade and out-compete native species 11, 12. Primarily, S. oleraceus recognized as a weed but later it was discovered to have great medicinal purposes. This weed mainly found in cultivated crops or around roadsides, and it play the important role in pharmaceuticals and animal nutrition 13. The genus Sonchusbelongs to tribe (Lactuceae), sub-tribe (Crepidinea) and family (Asteraceae) and includes more than 50 species. It is an annual, erect, leafy and glabrous herb with white milky juice, taproot is up to 1 m high 14. For instance, traditionally, it is used asfolklore medicine for the treatment of gastrointestinal tract 15, its juices prevent from hemorrhage during childbirth 16, decoction with kopa, clover, and salt is administered to expel placenta worms 17, 18, It is also used as sedative, vermifuge and in the treatment of the liver disorder, healing wounds and ulcers 19, treats phthisis 20, treats gastric spasm, hepatitis, infections, inflammation, headaches, general pain and rheumatism 21, 22, help in the treatment of vitiligo 23.
It is also used as a cathartic, cancer treatment and used as a vermicide 24. This plant contains a number of pharmacologically active compounds which are useful in the formation of herbal products including complex mixtures of leaves, stems, flowers, roots and seeds 25, 26. The main components of this plant are terpenes, steroids, flavones, and coumarins 27. Flavonoids are the secondary metabolites in plants which protects the plant from UV radiation and fungal infections 25, 26, 27, 28. Flavonoids (luteolin, apigenin, kaempferol, and quercetin) and their glucoside derivatives were identified from whole plant extracts. Composition of carotenoids 29 and characterization of coumarin30 from S. oleraceus was isolated and studied. Recently, caftaric acid is identified from the leaf extracts 31. This plant is known for its high content of antioxidants and antioxidant activity 32-36. The different extracts of Sonchus species indicate good anti-microbial activity. Methanolic extract of whole plant of S. oleraceus showed the antibacterial activity against six bacterial strains i.e. Clavibacter michiganensis, Escherichia coli, Erwinia amylovora, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus aquimaris and Pseudomonas syringae by using minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) methods 37. The antibacterial property of aqueous extract of Chinese S. olearceus was also evaluated 38. The antibacterial property from the roots of S. oleraceus was evaluated and ascribed to major compounds 39. The different extracts of this plant has been confirmed against anti-plasmodial activity 37, larvicidal activity 40 and antifungal activity 41. The genetic fingerprinting of 11 plant species including S. oleraceus of desert origin from various areas of Saudi Arabia were studied by using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) 42. A very few molecular work has done by the researchers on this plant, so it is needed to explore this plant at molecular level. Due to some environmental conditions and habitat, some changes occurred in the plant at the morphological and genetic level. The genetic diversity of S. oleraceus in Himachal Pradesh has not been investigated so far. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the presence of bioactive compounds, anti-microbial potential, and genetic diversity of natural populations of S. oleraceus using RAPD marker.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Plant Collection and Identification: Twenty-five accessions of S. oleraceus whole plants were collected manually from different districts of Himachal Pradesh (H.P.) viz., Bilaspur, Hamirpur, Kangra, Solan, and Una. The botanical material was authenticated by Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni (Solan), H.P. in the month of January, 2016 (Dispatched No. 074/2916). The vegetative and reproductive parts of this plant was shown in Fig. 1.
Extract Preparation: Plant leaves were washed properly under running tap water, 70 percent ethanol, and cleaned to remove soil particles and moisture with the aid of tissue paper. The leaves were kept for some time for drying to remove the moisture content and then sterilized with 0.1% mercuric chloride for around 5 minutes. The rinsed leaves of this plant were dried in darkroom and crushed to get a fine powder. The plant extracts were prepared by using a cold percolation method. For the preparation of different extracts, 60 grams of fine powder from each plant was dissolved in 160 ml of respective absolute solvents (in the following order: aqueous, chloroform, methanol, and ethyl acetate) for three successive days at room temperature. The supernatant was filtered through Whatman filter paper No. 1, while the residues were used for subsequent extraction. The dissolved parts were filtered and stored in a glass bottle or in petri plates. The filtrates were then evaporated under reduced pressure at 50 °C by using a rotary evaporator to yield the crude extract after the completion of third extraction. The yield was calculated using the equation 1:
Percentage Yield (%) = (Dry weight of extract ⁄ Dry weight of plant material) × 100
Phytochemical Analysis Qualitative: Preliminary phytochemical screening of S. oleraceus was performed as described previously 43.
FIG. 1: THE ABOVE PICTURES ARE SHOWING (A) EARLY VEGETATIVE AND LATE REPRODUCTIVE STAGES (B) HOLLOW STEM OF S. OLERACEUS (SOW THISTLE)
Anti-microbial Assay: Five pathogenic bacterial strains, namely Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, E. coli, Salmonella typhi, Klebsiella pneumoniae were collected from the microbiology lab of Shoolini University. The selected bacterial strains were carefully inoculated in all five test tubes containing nutrient broth and were incubated at 25-28°C under shaking conditions. The anti-microbial activity was performed with the help of the agar well diffusion method 44. In brief, 50 µl of the bacterial inoculums was spread over plates containing nutrient agar and then 6 mm wells were created with the help of puncture on the plates. These were impregnated the 6mm discs of Whatman paper within the wells and check the anti-microbial activity by taking 50µl of each extracts in different concentration i.e. 150mg/ml, 200mg/ml, 250mg/ml and 300mg/ml against all pathogenic bacteria. Two controls were included in test i.e. the antibiotic ampicillin of 10µl at concentration of 100 mg/ml (positive control) and DMSO was taken as a negative control. The plates were kept in the incubator for 24-48 h at 37 °C. The obtained inhibition zones (mm) around the disc were measured.
Extraction of Genomic DNA: Total genomic DNA was extracted from the leaves of S. oleraceus by Cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide method (CTAB) method as described previously 45.
Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Analysis: RAPD analysis was performed as described by Williams et al., with some modifications in the protocol 46. The genetic variation among was evaluated by using random decamer primers, including OPA-1(5’-CAGGCCCTTC-3’), OPA-3 (5'-AGTCAGCCAC-3'), OPA-9 (5’-GGG TAACGCC-3’), OPA-13 (5’-CAGCACCCAC-3’), OPA-14(5’-TCTGTGCTGG-3’), OPA-16(5’-AGC CAGCCAA-3’), TC-1(5’-GGAGTACTGG-3’), TC-2 (5’GGTCTAGAGG-3’), TC-3 (5’-GAGTCTCA GG-3’), and TC-4(5’-GGACTGCAGA-3’). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out in final volume (25 µL) of reaction mixture consisted of 1 µL (~100 ng) of genomic DNA, 2 µL (10 pM) of RAPD primer, 2.5 µL of 2 mM dNTPs, and 0.3 µL (5 U µLG1) of Taq DNA polymerase (Bangalore Genei Pvt. Ltd.) with 10X PCR buffer (containing 15 mM MgCl2). The PCR mixture was subjected to initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 36°C for 1 min and elongation at 72°C for 1 min with a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. The final PCR products were analyzed by performing electrophoresis using 1.5% agarose gel. The samples were loaded into wells along with a DNA molecular marker of 1kb plus to know the molecular size of the DNA sample.
Data Analysis: The RAPD fragments obtained upon agarose gel electrophoresis were scored for presence (1) and absence (0) of amplification bands for each sample. The data of similarity coefficients were generated and used to construct the dendrogram indicating the genetic relatedness or differentiation among the different isolates of S. oleraceus. Data was compiled as a binary 0-1 matrix, ʻ1ʼ represents the presence of a band and ʻ0ʼ represents the absence of a band in the specified size range. All high and low-intensity bands were considered in statistical analysis. Dendrogram was produced from the distance matrix by UPGMA (Unweighted Pair-Grouped Method Arithmetic) method, constructed using online D-UPGMA (DendroUPGMA: A dendrogram construction utility) program, version-2015.
RESULTS: In the present research work entitled “Analysis of phytochemical constituents, anti-microbial activity and molecular characterization of S. oleraceus L. using RAPD marker’’ was carried out during the year 2016. The study was aimed to check the anti-microbial components, presence of bioactive compounds, and genetic variation of different isolates of plant’s samples of S. oleraceus collected from different regions of Himachal Pradesh, namely Solan, Una, Bilaspur, Kangra, and Hamirpur Table 1. The collected leaves S. oleraceus were of different sizes (Small and Large) and colour (Light green and Dark green). This plant was authenticated by Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni (Solan), H.P. in the month of January 2016.
TABLE 1: PLACES OF COLLECTION OF DIFFERENT ACCESSIONS OF SONCHUS OLERACEUS L.
S. no. | Accessions and district | Place of collection | Plant Description | Locality Geographical Coordinates | Elevation in Meters | |||
Used Part | Colour of Leaves | Size of Plant | Latitute (◦N) | Longitude (◦E) | ||||
1 | B1 (Bilaspur) | Chandpur, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Dark
Green |
Small | 31̊ 21̍ 50̎ N | 76̊ 44̍ 57̎ E | 533 |
2 | B2 (Bilaspur) | Kandrore, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Dark
Green |
Small | 31̊ 23̍ 32̎ N | 76̊ 45̍ 42̎ E | 586 |
3 | B3 (Bilaspur) | Ghumarwin, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Dark
Green |
Small | 31̊ 29̍ 10̎ N | 76̊ 40̍ 07̎ E | 740 |
4 | B4 (Bilaspur) | Naina Devi, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Light
Green |
Small | 31̊ 17̍ 37̎ N | 76̊ 30̍ 57̎ E | 480 |
5 | B5 (Bilaspur) | Kuthera, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Light
Green |
Large | 31̊ 29̍ 56̎ N | 76̊ 43̍ 13̎ E | 751 |
6 | H1 (Hamirpur) | Galore, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Light
Green |
Large | 31̊ 40̍ 57̎ N | 76̊ 30̍ 31̎ E | 828 |
7 | H2 (Hamirpur) | Nadaun, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Dark
Green |
Large | 31̊ 46̍ 13̎ N | 76̊ 18̍ 37̎ E | 449 |
8 | H3 (Hamirpur) | Bangana, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Light
Green |
Small | 31̊ 36̍ 56̎ N | 76̊ 17̍ 18̎ E | 726 |
9 | H4 (Hamirpur) | Shahtalai, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Light
Green |
Small | 31̊ 27̍ 12̎ N | 76̊ 31̍ 25̎ E | 600 |
10 | H5 (Hamirpur) | Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Light
Green |
Large | 31̊ 41̍ 18̎ N | 76̊ 33̍ 29̎ E | 838 |
11 | K1 (Kangra) | Baijnath, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Light
Green |
Small | 23̊ 02̍ 54̎ N | 76̊ 37̍ 14̎ E | 907 |
12 | K2 (Kangra) | Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Dark
Green |
Large | 32̊ 09̍ 40̎ N | 76̊ 13̍ 08̎ E | 636 |
13 | K3 (Kangra) | Nurpur, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Light
Green |
Small | 32̊ 17̍ 05̎ N | 75̊ 52̍ 28̎ E | 467 |
14 | K4 (Kangra) | Jawalamukhi, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Light
Green |
Small | 31̊ 52̍ 08̎ N | 76̊ 18̍ 08̎ E | 490 |
15 | K5 (Kangra) | Jawali, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Light
Green |
Small | 32̊ 08̍ 12̎ N | 76̊ 00̍ 44̎ E | 435 |
16 | S1(Solan) | Nauni, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Light
Green |
Small | 30̊ 51̍ 46̎ N | 73̊ 10̍ 32̎ E | 1267 |
17 | S2 (Solan) | Baddi, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Dark
Green |
Large | 30̊ 58̍ 46̎ N | 76̊ 41̍ 19̎ E | 413 |
18 | S3 (Solan) | Sultanpur, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Light
Green |
Small | 30̊ 51̍ 58̎ N | 77̊ 05̍ 38̎ E | 1401 |
19 | S4 (Solan) | Kumarhatti, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Light
Green |
Small | 30̊ 53̍ 11̎ N | 77̊ 03̍ 16̎ E | 1712 |
20 | S5 (Solan) | Nalagarh, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Dark
Green |
Small | 30̊ 02̍ 14̎ N | 76̊ 44̍ 22̎ E | 498 |
21 | U1 (Una) | Amb, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Dark
Green |
Large | 31̊ 41̍ 03̎ N | 76̊ 07̍ 26̎ E | 484 |
22 | U2 (Una) | Haroli, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Dark
Green |
Large | 31̊ 24̍ 45̎ N | 76̊ 13̍ 12̎ E | 469 |
23 | U3 (Una) | Gagret, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Dark
Green |
Large | 31̊ 38̍ 08̎ N | 76̊ 03̍ 11̎ E | 513 |
24 | U4 (Una) | Chintpurni, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Dark
Green |
Large | 31̊ 48̍ 59̎ N | 76̊ 03̍ 42̎ E | 780 |
25 | U5 (Una) | Una, Himachal Pradesh, India | Leaves | Dark
Green |
Large | 31̊ 24̍ 53̎ N | 76̊ 13̍ 08̎ E | 512 |
Phytochemical Studies: For phytochemical studies, various extracts, i.e., methanol extract, chloroform extract, ethyl acetate, and aqueous extract of this plant, were prepared by using a cold percolation method. The yield (g) of these extracts was measured in Table 2. After phytochemical analysis of all prepared extracts, it was found that alkaloids were confirmed in all the extracts. The carbohydrates were not present in chloroform extract, and flavonoids were present in all the extracts. Tannins were not present in the chloroform extract, but in chloroform extract, the phenols were confirmed. Terpenoids were present in all the extracts except methanol extract. Saponin was only present in the aqueous extract, and the amino acids were not present in the methanol extract Table 3. The qualitative phytochemical screening was done to detect the various bioactive compounds by different tests Fig. 2.
TABLE 2: YIELDS (IN G) OF DIFFERENT EXTRACTS OF S. OLERACEUS
S. no. | Extracts | Weight of extracts (in g) |
1 | Methanol | 0.969g |
2 | Aqueous | 0.654g |
3 | Chloroform | 0.336g |
4 | Ethyl acetate | 0.128g |
FIG. 2: DIFFERENT TEST FOR ANALYSIS OF ALKALOIDS, CARBOHYDRATES, FLAVONOIDS, TANNINS/PHENOLS AND TRITERPENOIDS IN ETHYL ACETATE, METHANOL, CHLOROFORM AND AQUEOUS EXTRACT; A-CONTROL 1 (CHLOROFORM), B-CONTROL 2 (CONC. H2SO4) C-METHANOL EXTRACT, D-CHLOROFORM EXTRACT, E-ETHYL ACETATE EXTRACT AND F-AQUEOUS EXTRACT
TABLE 3: RESULT OF PHYTOCHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS PRESENT IN DIFFERENT EXTRACTS I.E. METHANOL EXTRACT, ETHYL ACETATE EXTRACT, CHLOROFORM EXTRACT AND AQUEOUS EXTRACT OF S. OLERACEUS
Phytochemical Constituents | Aqueous extract | Methanol
Extract |
Chloroform
extract |
Ethyl acetate extract |
Alkaloids | + | + | + | + |
Carbohydrates | + | + | - | + |
Flavonoids | + | + | + | + |
Tannins | + | + | - | + |
Terpenoids | + | - | + | + |
Phenols | - | - | + | _ |
Saponin | + | - | - | - |
Xanthoprotein | + | - | + | + |
Note= Sign + (for presence) and Sign – (for absence)
Anti-microbial Potential: The anti-microbial activity of the aqueous, methanol, chloroform, and ethyl acetate extracts of S. oleraceus was checked against the bacterial strains of K. pneumoniae, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and S. typhii at different concentrations (150mg/ml, 200mg/ml, 250mg/ml and 300mg/ml) Fig. 4. The inhibition zones (mm) of varying sizes against all bacteria’s were obtained in Table 4. The graphical represen-tation of anti-microbial activity of all extracts against all respective bacterias was shown in Fig. 3. The zone of inhibition of 20 mm was observed around the aqueous extract and 15 mm around the methanol extract. The chloroform and ethyl acetate extract showed no inhibition zone against the different extracts of S. oleraceus against K. pneumoniae. The aqueous extract indicated the maximum inhibition zone against K. pneumoniae at 300 mg/ml. The methanol extract showed the minimum inhibition zones than the aqueous extract. Ethyl acetate and the chloroform extract did not show any inhibition zone against K. pneumoniae. The ethyl acetate and chloroform extract did not show any inhibition zone at any concentration. Ethyl acetate extract indicated the maximum inhibition zones against S. aureus at 300 mg/ml. The aqueous extract indicated the maximum inhibition zones against E. coli at 300 mg/ml. The chloroform extract showed the minimum inhibition zones than the aqueous extract. The ethyl acetate extract showed very less inhibition zone at the concentration of 300 mg/ml that aqueous extract indicated the maximum inhibition zones against S. typhi at 300 mg/ml. The ethyl acetate extract and chloroform did not show any inhibition zone against S. typhi at different concentration. The aqueous extract indicated the maximum inhibition zone against P. aeruginosa at 300 mg/ml. The methanol extract showed the minimum Inhibition zones than the aqueous extract. The ethyl acetate showed very less inhibition zone of 18 mm against P. aeruginosa. By comparing the diameters of the inhibition zones, the various extracts of S. oleraceus showed less or same activity than standard antibiotic. S. aureus was the most susceptible bacteria amongst all bacterial strains. The anti-microbial activity of different extracts of S. oleraceus was associated with the concentration Fig. 4. With the higher concentration of extracts, the growth of bacteria was low.
FIG. 3: THE GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF ANTI-MICROBIAL POTENTIAL OF DIFFERENT EXTRACTS AT DIFFERENT CONCENTRATIONS
TABLE 4: INHIBITION ZONES OF DIFFERENT EXTRACTS VIZ. AQUEOUS, METHANOL, CHLOROFORM AND ETHYL ACETATE EXTRACT OF S. OLERACEUS AGAINST ALL BACTERIAS AT DIFFERENT CONCENTRATIONS
Inhibition zones of S. oleraceus against K. pneumoniae | ||||
Plant extracts | 150mg/ml | 200mg/ml | 250mg/ml | 300mg/ml |
Aqueous | 12 | 14 | 17 | 20 |
Methanol | 8 | 10 | 12 | 15 |
Chloroform | _ | _ | _ | _ |
Ethyl acetate | _ | _ | _ | _ |
Inhibition zones of S. oleraceus against S. aureus | ||||
Plant extracts | 150mg/ml | 200mg/ml | 250mg/ml | 300mg/ml |
Aqueous | 20 | 20 | 22 | 23 |
Methanol | 21 | 22 | 22 | 23 |
Chloroform | 18 | 21 | 21 | 24 |
Ethyl acetate | 24 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
Inhibition zones of S. oleraceus against E. coli | ||||
Plant extracts | 150mg/ml | 200mg/ml | 250mg/ml | 300mg/ml |
Aqueous | 18 | 19 | 21 | 21 |
Methanol | 14 | 15 | 17 | 18 |
Chloroform | _ | _ | 15 | 20 |
Ethyl acetate | _ | 14 | 17 | 15 |
Inhibition zones of S. oleraceus against S. typhi | ||||
Plant extracts | 150mg/ml | 200mg/ml | 250mg/ml | 300mg/ml |
Aqueous | _ | 12 | 14 | 15 |
Methanol | _ | _ | _ | 12 |
Chloroform | _ | _ | _ | _ |
Ethyl acetate | _ | _ | _ | _ |
Inhibition zones of S. oleraceus against P. aeruginosa | ||||
Plant extracts | 150mg/ml | 200mg/ml | 250mg/ml | 300mg/ml |
Aqueous | 17 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
Methanol | _ | 17 | 18 | 19 |
Chloroform | _ | 18 | 19 | 20 |
Ethyl acetate | _ | _ | 17 | 18 |
FIG. 4: ANTI-MICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF S. OLERACEUS IN DIFFERENT EXTRACTS I.E., EA-ETHYL ACETATE, A-AQUEOUS, C-CHLOROFORM, D-DMSO, M-METHANOL AND AMP-AMPICILLIN AT VARYING CONCENTRATIONS viz., (1) 150mg/ml CONC. (2) 200mg/ml CONC. (3) 250mg/ml CONC. (4) 300mg/ml CONC. AGAINST ALL BACTERIAS
Molecular Characterization: There were a collection of 25 samples of S. oleraceus from five districts of Himachal Pradesh namely Una, Kangra, Hamirpur, Bilaspur and Solan Table 1. A panel of 14 different villages of all districts was used, namely (U1, U2, U3) from Una, (H1, H2, H3) from Hamirpur, (B1, B2, B3) from Bilaspur, (K1, K2, K3) from Kangra, S1, S2 from Solan of Himachal Pradesh for molecular characterization Table 5. The genomic DNAs and RAPD banding patterns of a panel of 14 regions of each district for molecular characterization were isolated and amplified with the random polymorphic five RAPD primers Fig. 5. The obtained data of the number and size of amplified fragments with RAPD primers were evaluated after PCR amplification. A total of 48, 72, 57, 54 and 23 bands were scored by using specific primers OPA-1, OPA-9, OPA-16, TC-1 and TC-3 respectively Table 6. The number and size of the amplified products resulted from random primers were varied between 23-72 and 200-3000 base pairs, respectively. Clustering based on RAPD fingerprints data revealed formation of a single group which constituted nine independent branches on the similarity scale value of 0.25 (~71% similarity level) Fig. 6. Cluster analysis revealed that isolates Galore (H1) and Bangana (H3), Nadaun (H2) and Baddi (S2), Amb (U1) and Haroli (U2) were showing maximum homology. However, at similarity scale value of 0.2 (~57% similarity level) few of the isolates got divided into two independent groups, which were distantly related to each other. The first group comprises of isolates Chandpur (B1), Ghumarwin (B3), Galore (H1), and Bangana (H3), and the second group comprises of isolates Nurpur (K3), Kandrore (B2), Nadaun (H2), Baddi (S2), Amb (U1) and Haroli (U2). The isolate Baiznath (K1) from Kangra district was found to be distantly related to the other two samples from the same district, viz., Dharamshala (K2) and Nurpur (K3). While, the isolate Nauni (S1) from Solan district was also found to be distantly related to the other Baddi (S2) isolate from the same district.
Similarly, the isolate Amb (U1) from the Una district was found to be distantly related to the other Haroli (U2), and Gagret (U3) isolates from the same district. However, the isolates Chandpur (B1) and Ghumarwin (B3) from the Bilaspur district were found to be closely related to each other, but were both distantly related to the isolate Kandrore (B2) from the same district. In comparison to all the isolates, isolate Baijnath (K1) from the Kangra district showed the least homology to all the other isolates from the total covered five districts of Himachal Pradesh.
FIG. 5: (A) GENOMIC DNAS ISOLATION FROM A PANEL OF 14 SAMPLES OF S. OLERACEUS NAMELY: (U1, U2, U3) FROM Una, (H1, H2, H3) FROM HAMIRPUR, (B1, B2, B3) FROM BILASPUR, (K1, K2, K3) - FROM KANGRA AND (S1, S2) FROM SOLAN RESPECTIVELY (B) RAPD BANDING PATTERNS OF EACH REGION OF A PANEL WITH RAPD PRIMERS AFTER PCR AMPLIFICATION, WHEREAS L STANDS LADDER (1kb)
TABLE 5: A PANEL OF DIFFERENT REGIONS OF EACH DISTRICT VIZ. UNA, HAMIRPR, BILASPUR, KANGRA WERE USED FOR MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION
S. no. | A Panel of different regions of each district in molecular characterization | ||||
Una | Hamirpur | Bilaspur | Kangra | Solan (S) | |
1 | Amb (U1) | Galore (H1) | Chandpur (B1) | Baijnath (K1) | Nauni (S1) |
2 | Haroli (U2) | Nadaun (H2) | Kandrore (B2) | Dharamshala (K2) | Baddi (S2) |
3 | Gagret (U3) | Bangana (H3) | Ghumarwin (B3) | Nurpur (K3) | - |
TABLE 6: PRIMER NAME, NUMBER AND SIZE OF FRAGMENTS AMPLIFIED BY RAPD PRIMERS
S. no. | Primers | Sequence 5’-3’ | Amplified Fragments | Maximum Band Size (bp) | Minimum Band Size (bp) |
1 | OPA-1 | (5’-CAGGCCCTTC-3’) | 48 | 1800 | 600 |
2 | OPA-9 | (5’-GGGTAACGCC-3’) | 72 | 1300 | 300 |
3 | OPA-16 | (5’-AGCCAGCCAA-3’) | 57 | 3000 | 400 |
4 | TC-1 | (5’-GGAGTACTGG-3’) | 54 | 1800 | 250 |
5 | TC-3 | (5’-GAGTCTCAGG-3’) | 23 | 1900 | 200 |
FIG. 6: DENDROGRAM OF S. OLERACEUS SPECIES DERIVED FROM RAPD FINGERPRINTS GENERATED BY USING FIVE DIFFERENT PRIMERS PRODUCED FROM THE DISTANCE MATRIX BY UPGMA (UNWEIGHTED PAIR-GROUPED METHOD ALIGNMENT) BY ARITHMETIC AVERAGE, CONTAINED IN THE SOFTWARE PACKAGE NTsys 2.2 VERSION
CONCLUSION: In the present project entitled “Analysis of anti-microbial potential and molecular characterization of S. oleraceus from different districts of Himachal Pradesh was carried out during the year, 2016. The present study revealed that ethyl acetate extract showed the maximum anti-microbial activity against S. aureus. This plant contains various bioactive compounds (flavonoids, saponins, tannins, phenols, and alkaloids) and contributes to various pharmaceutical responses. Molecular characterization using RAPD revealed the genetic variance between the fourteen samples selected from the total of twenty-five samples from five districts of HP. RAPD was done with the help of different primers and clustering based on RAPD fingerprints data revealed formation of a single group which constituted nine independent branches on the similarity scale value of 0.25 (~71% similarity level). Cluster analysis revealed that isolates H1 and H3, H2 and S2, U1 and U2 were showing maximum homology. However, at a similarity scale value of 0.2 (~57% similarity level) few of the isolates got divided into two independent groups, which were distantly related to each other. RAPD markers exhibit reasonable speed, cost, and efficiency compared with other methods, and RAPD can be done in a moderate laboratory. Therefore, despite its reproducibility problem, it will probably be important until better techniques are developed in terms of cost, time, and labour. The study on this plant can be useful in germplasm characterization and animal plant-microbe inter-actions. This work can be useful in the future to know the anti-microbial potential and explore phytochemical constituents quantitatively and their role against various pathogen.
The various phytochemicals present in stems and flowers can also be checked against the protection from many diseases. Hence, further study is needed to explore the benefits and the ability of S. oleraceus extracts as one of the therapeutic raw material in food, nutraceutical and pharmaceutical industries in future
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Mr. Sumeet Parkash Kaundal is thankful to Prof. P. K. Khosla, Hon’ble Vice-Chancellor, Shoolini University of Biotech-nology and Management Sciences, Solan, for providing financial support and necessary facilities. In addition to the author acknowledges the valuable inputs and support provided by Dr. Kamal Dev and Dr. Anuradha Sourirajan, Professors, Shoolini University, Solan, HP.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: All authors declared that there is no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES:
- Holm L, Pancho JV, Herberger JP and Plucknett L: A geographical atlas of world weeds. John Wiley and Sons, 1979.
- Magadi RG: Botanical and vernacular names of south Indian plants. Divya Chandra prakashana, Bangalore, India 2001; 282-83.
- Chauhan BS, Gill G and Preston C: Influence of tillage systems on vertical distribution, seedling recruitment and persistence of rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) seed bank. Weed Science2006; 54(4): 669-76.
- Chowdhery HJ and Wadhwa BM: Flora of Himachal Pradesh. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta 1984: 163.
- Srivastava SK, Choudhary HJ and Rawat GS: Some economically important plants from Beas-Sutlej Link Project area in Himachal Pradesh. Recent Advances in Plant Sciences 1987; 131-46.
- Rao RR, Choudhary HJ and Srivastava SK: Report on Assessment of the ecology and vegetation of Beas-Sutlej Link Project in Himachal Pradesh. BSI, Calcutta: 1987.
- Aswal BS and Mehrotra BN: Flora of Lahaul-Spiti (A cold desert in North-West Himalaya). Dehradun: Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh 1994.
- Dhaliwal DS and Sharma M: Flora of Kullu district. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh 1999.
- Singh KK and Kumar K: Ethnobotanical wisdom of Gaddi tribe in western Himalaya. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh 2000.
- Kaur H and Sharma M: Flora of Sirmaur, Himachal Pradesh. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh 2004.
- Sujay YH, Sattagi HN and Patil RK: Invasive alien insects and their impact on agroecosystem. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2010; 23(1): 26-34.
- Pant HM and Sharma N: Inventory of some exotic cultivated tree species of Doon valley and their ethnobotanical uses. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 2010; 4(20): 2144-47.
- Hassan MO, Gomaa NH, Fahmy GM, González L, Hammouda O and Atteya AM: Interactions between Sonchus oleraceus and some weeds in agroecosystems in Egypt. Annals of Agricultural Sciences2014; 59(2): 221-28.
- Braun M., Burgstaller H, Hamdoun AM and Walter H: Common weeds of central Sudan. Verlag Josef Margraf 1991.
- Hussain J, Muhammad Z, Ullah R., Khan FU, Khan IU, Khan N, Ali J and Jan S: Evaluation of the chemical composition of Sonchus eruca and Sonchus asper.Journal of American Science 2010; 6(9): 231-35.
- Bell TW: Medical notes on New Zealand. New Zealand Medical Journal1890; 3(65-83): 129-45.
- Goldie WH: Maori medical lore: Notes on the causes of disease and treatment of the sick among the Maori people of New Zealand, as believed and practised in former times, together with some account of various ancient rites connected with the same. Southern Reprints 1998.
- Best E: Maori medical lore. Notes on sickness and disease among the maori people of new zealand, and their treatment of the sick; together with some account of various beliefs, superstitions and rites pertaining to sickness, and the treatment thereof, as collected from the tuhoe tribe. Part I.—(Continued). The Journal of the Polynesian Society1905; 14(1-53): 1-23.
- Khare CP: Indian medicinal plants: an illustrated dictionary. Springer Science & Business Media 2008.
- Ahmad SS, Khan SM and Butt A: Exploring the Medicinal Plants Wealth: An Assessment of Traditional Medico-Botanical Knowledge of Local Communities in Changa Manga Forest, Pakistan. The Pharmaceutical and Chemical Journal 2015; 2(3): 24-32.
- Vendruscolo GS and Mentz A: Ethnobotanical survey of the medicinal plants used by the community of Ponta Grossa neighborhood, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. IherigiaSérieBotânica 2006; 61: 83-103.
- Agra MD, Baracho GS, Nurit K, Basílio IJ and Coelho VP: Medicinal and poisonous diversity of the flora of “CaririParaibano”, Brazil. Journal of ethnopharmacology, 2007; 111(2): 383-95.
- Resende JH, de Aquino GS, do Nascimento FR, Aguiar MM and Fiorelli RK: Oral Use of an Infusion of Leaves of Solanum paniculatum, Jacaranda brasiliensis and Sonchus oleraceus for Treatment of Vitiligo. Journal of Cosmetics, Dermatological Sciences and Applications 2015; 5(4): 317.
- Liu Z and Zhao X: Effects of different extraction methods on extraction rate of polysaccharide from Sonchus oleraceus Medicinal Plant 2010; 1(5): 31-35.
- Bent S: Herbal medicine in the United States: review of efficacy, safety, and regulation. Journal of general internal medicine 2008; 23(6): 854-59.
- Puri AV, Khandagale PD and Ansari YN: A review on ethnomedicinal, pharmacological and phytochemical aspects of Sonchus oleraceus (Asteraceae). International Journal of Pharmacy and Biological sciences 2018; 8(3): 1-9.
- Jiang L, Wang GR and Yao QQ: Review on the chemical constituents and pharmcological activities of Sonchus [J]. Qilu Pharmaceutical Affairs 2007; 11.
- Shashidhra KV, Manoj K and Abdhesh K: Tetrahedron Letters, 2012; 53(18): 2355- 59.
- Mercadante AZ and Rodriguez‐Amaya DB: Carotenoid composition and vitamin A value of some native Brazilian green leafy vegetables. International Journal of Food Science & Technology 1990; 25(2): 213-19.
- Govindappa M, Naik C and Prakash B: Channabasava. Anticoagulant activity of partially purified coumarin (s) extracts of Sonchus oleraceus. Advancement in Medicinal Plant Research 2015; 3(3): 87-91.
- Ou ZQ, Schmierer DM, Rades T, Larsen L and McDowell A: Application of an online post‐column derivatization HPLC‐DPPH assay to detect compounds responsible for antioxidant activity in Sonchus oleraceus leaf extracts. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 2013; 65(2): 271-79.
- Pietta PG: Flavonoids as antioxidants. Journal of Natural Products 2000; 63(7): 1035-42.
- Yin J, Kwon GJ and Wang MH: The antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of Sonchus oleraceus extracts. Nutrition research and Practice 2007; 1(3): 189-94.
- McDowell A, Thompson S, Stark M, Ou ZQ and Gould KS: Antioxidant activity of puha (Sonchus oleraceus) as assessed by the cellular antioxidant activity (CAA) assay. Phytotherapy Research 2011; 25(12): 1876-82.
- Xia DZ, Yu XF, Zhu ZY and Zou ZD: Antioxidant and antibacterial activity of six edible wild plants (Sonchus spp.) in China. Natural Product Research 2011; 25(20): 1893-1901.
- Ou ZQ, Rades T and McDowell A: Anti-ageing effects of Sonchus oleraceus (pūhā) leaf extracts on H2O2-induced cell senescence. Molecules 2015; 20(3): 4548-64.
- Karar MG, Rezk A, Abdalla T, Ebrahim A, Ullrich S and Kuhnert N: Antimicrobial, antiparasitic and antioxidant activities of medicinal plants from Sudan. Journal of Complementary Medicine & Alternative Healthcare 2017; 2(5): 555-97.
- Li W, Sun H, Zhou J, Zhang Y, Liu L and Gao Y: Antibacterial activities, antioxidant contents and antioxidant properties of three traditional Chinese medicinal extracts. Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology 2015; 10(1): 131-37.
- Elkhayat ES: Cytotoxic and antibacterial constituents from the roots of Sonchus oleraceus growing in Egypt. Pharmacognosy Magazine 2009; 5(20): 324.
- Sharma P, Mohan L and Srivastava CN: Phytoextract-induced developmental deformities in malaria vector. Bioresource Technology 2006; 97(14): 1599-1604.
- Mahasneh AM and Al-Hussaini R: Antibacterial and antifungal activity of ethanol extract of different parts of medicinal plants in Jordan. Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2011; 108(397): 1-26.
- Arif IA, Bakir MA, Khan HA, Al Farhan AH, Al Homaidan AA, Bahkali AH, Al Sadoon M and Shobrak M: Application of RAPD for molecular characterization of plant species of medicinal value from an arid environment. Genetics and Molecular Research 2010; 9(4): 2191-98.
- Jain SK and Singh GK: Preliminary Phytochemical Sereening and in-vitro antioxidant Activity of Extracts of whole Plant of Sonchus oleraceusResearch Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2014; 2319: 555X.
- Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC and Yolken RH: Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 6th edition. American Society of Microbiology Press, Washington DC 1995: 1482.
- Doyle JJ and Doyle JL: A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. 1987
- Williams JG, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA and Tingey SV: DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Research 1990; 18(22): 6531-35.
How to cite this article:
Kaundal SP, Sharma A and Kulshrestha S: Analysis of phytochemical constituents, antimicrobial activity and molecular characterization of medicinal weed Sonchus oleraceus L. using rapd marker. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2021; 12(12): 6453-63. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.12(12).6453-63.
All © 2021 are reserved by the International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
32
6453-6463
1861 KB
372
English
IJPSR
Sumeet Parkash Kaundal *, Anshul Sharma and Saurabh Kulshrestha
Faculty of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Bajhol, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India.
sp.kaundal786@gmail.com
11 January 2021
16 March 2021
28 May 2021
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.12(12).6453-63
01 December 2021