ANTI – INFLAMMATORY ACTIVITY OF EXTRACTS OF WOODFORDIA FRUTICOSA STEMS BARK IN ANIMAL MODELS
HTML Full TextANTI - INFLAMMATORY ACTIVITY OF EXTRACTS OF WOODFORDIA FRUTICOSA STEMS BARK IN ANIMAL MODELS
Neeli Rose Beck* and Kamta Prasad Namdeo
S. L. T. Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur - 495009, Chhattisgarh, India.
ABSTRACT: Inflammation is an inflammatory process where histamine, kinin, prostaglandins and slow release substances are produced in the tissue of the body to cause irritation or injury. It consist three phases, dilation and increased permeability of small blood vessels resulting in oedema and swelling, emigration of leucocytes from venules, capillaries and cellular infiltration, proliferation of fibroblasts and synthesis of new connective tissue to repair the injury. Present study deals anti-inflammatory activity of extracts of Woodfordia fruticosa stems bark in animal models by mercury displacement volume method. Paw oedema was produced by injecting in a 0.1ml volume of formalin into the sub plantar tissue of the rat hind paw foot. The extracts of petroleum ether, chloroform, ethanol and aqueous extracts were administered orally to the albino rats in their respective groups. Test drugs were given at a dose of 200mg/kg according to their body weight. The results of aqueous extract of barks exhibited statistically significant (**P<0.01 and *P<0.05) anti-inflammatory activity in albino rats. Maximum percentage inhibition had been found in aqueous extract (27.12%) of this stem barks. W. fruticosa extracts exhibited anti-inflammatory activity may be due to the presence of β-sitosterol which is neutralized the release of histamine and serotonin.
Keywords: |
Anti-inflammatory activity, Dhawai stems bark, Medicinal plants, Inflammation, Rat paw oedema, Woodfordia fruticosa
INTRODUCTION: Woodfordia fruticosa is an evergreen shrub growing wild in the tropical and subtropical region of India. Earlier works and literature revealed that plants contain phyto-constituents which are hydrolysable tannins, oenothein A and B, woodfordins A, pelargonidin-3, 5, diglucoside, cyanidin-3,5, diglucoside, quercetin and myricetin glycosides, pelargonidin B, C, D, E, F, G, H and I, Phytosterols, hydrocarbons, octacosanol and β-sitosterol.
Nectar- rich flowers have potent medicinal value 1, 2. The powdered dried flowers are used as stimulant and also used in the treatment of dysentery, diarrhoea, internal haemorrhages, leucorrhoea, and menorrhagia, disorders of the mucous membranes, haemorrhoids and disorders of the liver. Flowers and roots are useful in the treatment of rheumatism, dysentery, foot and mouth disease, lumbar and rib fracture 3 - 7. The object of this study was to assess the anti-inflammatory activity of different extracts obtained from Woodfordia fruticosa stem barks, using mercury displacement method in albino rats.
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Collection and Identification of Plant Material: Collection of Woodfordia fruticosa stem barks was done from Chhattisgarh region, India. Plant material was identified by Botanist, Department of Botany, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur, C. G. The Voucher specimen (SLT/MedPlant/01/2009) was maintained in herbal museum for further reference in SLT Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur, C. G. The plant material was shade dried and then powdered with mechanical grinder, passed through the sieve no 40, and stored in an air tight container. The sieved powder was further taken up for the preparation of the extract.
Preparation of Extracts: 100gm shade dried stems bark powdered material was subjected to successive solvent extraction in Soxhlet extractor using petroleum ether, chloroform, alcohol and aqueous as solvent. All extracts were filtered, concentrated, dried by using vacuum pressure individually. The yields of extracts were weighed and physical properties were noted and the result is shown in Table 1.
Phytochemical Analysis: Preliminary phyto-chemical screening was carried out for various phytoconstituents which were present in the extracts. The all extracts were tested standard qualitative tests for the positive or negative test of phytoconstituents likes glycoside, alkaloids, steroids, flavonoids, tannins, mucilages, fixed oils, phenolic compounds, proteins and sterols etc. 8, 9. Spectroscopic analysis was carried out and the result is shown in Fig. 1, 2 and 3.
TABLE 1: PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF W. FRUTICOSA EXTRACTS
S. no | Extracts | Nature | Colour | Yield (gm) | %Yield(w/w) |
1 | Pet. ether ext. of W. fruticosa bark powder | Solid | Reddish brown | 1.21 | 1,21 |
2 | Chloroform extract of W. fruticosa bark powder | Solid | Brown | 0.45 | 0.45 |
3 | Ethanolic extract of W. fruticosa bark powder | Solid | Chocolate red with shining | 10.13 | 10.13 |
4 | Aqueous extract of W. fruticosa bark powder | Solid | Chocolate red with shining | 9.53 | 9.53 |
Experimental Animals: 200-250gm Albino Wister rats were obtained from SLT Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur; C.G. Animals were housed in groups of five in animal centre, Department of Pharmacy, at the room temperature of 25 ± 1 °C with free access to water and food. The study procedure was approved by IAEC (Institutional Animal Ethics Committee), Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, G.G.V., Bilaspur, CG. Registration number is 994/a/Go/06/CPCSEA. For pharmacological screening of anti-inflammatory activity, albino rats were divided into six different groups. The first group served as a control group, second group was used as standard and the last four test groups which were received extracts of petroleum ether, chloroform, alcoholic and aqueous of Woodfordia fruticosa stems bark respectively at the dose of 200 mg/kg orally.
Experimental Design:
Acute Oral Toxicity: Healthy Albino Wister rats (200 - 250gm) of either sex were selected for pharmacological study. These animals were starved and orally fed the extracts of W. fruticosa stem barks in increasing dose level of 50, 100, 250, 500, 1000, 2000 and 5000 mg/kg of body weight. Rats were observed for 24 hrs for any lethality 10, 11.
Formalin Induced Rat Hind Paw Oedema Method: Albino Wister rats (200-250gm) were used for the pharmacological study of drugs. The rats were divided into seven groups of six rats in each group. Inflammation was produced in rats by injection of 0.1ml of 1% w/v formalin into the sub plantar region of left hind paw 12, 13. For pharmacological study following groups were divided.
Group I administered distilled water, to serve as control animals. Group II administered formalin (0.1ml), to serve as formalin control animals. Group III administered formalin (0.1ml) and analgin (30mg/kg), as standard animals. Group IV (Test group) administered formalin (0.1ml) and petroleum ether extract at a dose of 200mg/kg, as test animals. Group V administered formalin (0.1ml) and chloroform extract at a dose of 200mg/kg as test animals. Group VI administered formalin (0.1ml) and alcoholic extract at a dose of 200mg/kg as test animals. Group VII administered formalin (0.1ml) and aqueous extract at a dose of 200mg/kg as test animals.
The paw volume was measured by plethysmometric apparatus, before formalin injection and after 30 min formalin injection. 30 and 60 min after drug administration rat paw oedema volume was measured each and every group. The average paw swelling in the groups of extract treated rats were compared with control group and change in oedema was calculated. Result is represented in Table 2 and Fig. 5.
TABLE 2: ANTIINFLAMMATORY ACTIVITY OF EXTRACTS OF W. FRUTICOSA STEMS BARK
Paw oedema Volume (ml) | ||||||
S. no. | Group | Dose (mg/kg) | 0 Min (before treatment of formalin) | Increase paw volume (after 30 min treatment of formalin ) | 30 Min
(after treatment of drug) |
60 Min |
1 | Control (distal water) | 0.55± 0.01 | 0.54± 0.02 | 0.55± 0.03 | 0.56±.02 | |
2 | Formalin (1%) control | 0.1ml | 0.55± 0.02 | 0.995± 0.01 | 1.02± 0.05** | 1.08± 0.01** |
3 | Formalin + Standard(STD)
(Analgin) |
30mg | 0.56± 0.01 | 1.1± 0.02 | 1.03±0.04**
|
0.885± 0.05**
|
4 | Formalin + Petroleum ether extract(PEE) of W. fruticosa of bark | 200mg | 0.55± 0.01 | 1.65± 0.01 | 1.55±0.03** | 1.35±0.002**
|
5 | Formalin + Chloroform extract (CHE) of W. fruticosa bark | 200mg | 0.54± 0.01 | 1.290± 0.01 | 1.24±0.034**
|
1.02±0.006**
|
6 | Formalin +Alcoholic extract(ALCE) of W. fruticosa bark | 200mg | 0.55± 0.01 | 1.15± 0.003 | 1.10±0.01**
|
0.902±0.1**
|
7 | Formalin +Aqueous extract(AqE) of W. fruticosa bark | 200 mg | 0.53± 0.03 | 1.32±0.01 | 1.25±0.02**
|
0.962±0.002**
|
Mean ± SEM, (n = 6) followed by Dunnett’s test, Significant at **P < 0.01,*P < 0.05, ns P > 0.05.ns-Not significant.
Statistical Analysis: The results were expressed as Mean ± SEM. The Dunnett’s test was used to make a statistical comparison between the control and standard as well as test groups. The results obtained by statistical comparison with P < 0.01 and P < 0.05 was considered as significant. Percentage inhibition was calculated using formula % Inhibition = D0-Dt/D0×100 where D0 was the average inflammation of the group of rats after 30 min treatment of formalin; and Dt was the average inflammation of the drug treated rats after 30 and 60 min. Result is represented in Table 3 and Fig. 6.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Characterization of W. fruticosa Barks Extract:
Compound 1: White crystalline substance, melting point: 144-146°C, IR: (KBr. V max cm-1) 3449.73, (O-H str) 2920.56, 2346.10 (C-H str) (Fig. 1). 1HNMR (DMSO, 300MHz): δ 3.1307 (m), 5.6627 (s) 1.57(s), 8.37 (d), 3.77 (m), 5.3456 (s) (Fig. 2). MS: m/z 413.2[m +1], m+ 149, 430.8 (Fig. 3).
On the basis of these experimental data the compound was identified may be as β- sitosterol (C29H50O, m. wt 414.7) and it is shown in Fig. 4.
FIG. 1: INFRA RED SPECTRUM OF β-SITOSTEROL
FIG. 2: NMR SPECTRUM OF β-SITOSTERO
FIG. 3: MASS SPECTRUM OF β-SITOSTEROL
TABLE 3: PERCENTAGE INHIBITION OF PAW OEDEMA OF EXTRACTS OF W. FRUTICOSA STEMS BARK
S.
no |
Group | Dose
(mg/kg) |
% inhibition 30min
(after treatment of drug) |
% inhibition 60min
(after treatment of drug) |
1 | Formalin + Standard(STD) (Analgin) | 30mg | 6.3% | 21.5% |
2 | Formalin + Petroleum ether extract (PEE) of W. fruticosa bark | 200mg | 6.06% | 18.18% |
3 | Formalin + Chloroform extract (CHE) of W. fruticosa bark | 200mg | 3.87% | 20.93% |
4 | Formalin + Alcoholic extract(ALCE) of W. fruticosa bark | 200mg | 4.34% | 21.56% |
5 | Formalin + Aqueous extract (AqE) of W. fruticosa bark | 200 mg | 5.30% | 27.12% |
% Inhibition = D0-Dt/D0×100 where D0 was the average inflammation of the group of rats after 30 min treatment of formalin; and Dt was the average inflammation of the drug treated rats after 30 and 60 min.
FIG. 4: MOLECULAR STRUCTURE OF β- SITOSTEROL
Pharmacological Study: Acute oral toxicity study revealed that no lethality and mortality was found in animals in increasing dose of 50mg to mg/kg of body weight. The present study revealed that positive anti-inflammatory activity was found in extracts of Woodfordia fruticosa stems bark in formalin induced rat hind paw oedema method. Inflammation is biological responses which remove the injurious stimuli and initiate healing process for tissues 14.
The inflammations induced by formalin injection, release of chemical mediators are in three phases. The first phase chemical substances are released histamine and serotonin which is increased vascular permeability. The second phase bradykinin are released which are responsible for pain and inflammation. The third phase chemical mediators are released prostaglandins and cyclooxygenase 15, 16.
FIG. 5: GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF ANTIINFLAMMATORY ACTIVITY OF W. FRUTICOSA BARK
Present study showed that the all extracts of W. fruticosa barks possessed a significant anti-oedematogenic effect on paw oedema induced by formalin (Table 2, Fig. 5). In this study the result exhibited that the paw volume was decreased when time was increased, that is inhibiting the swelling of rat paw oedema and release of chemical mediators like histamine, bradykinin, serotonin and prostaglandin etc. Formalin induced rat paw oedema test for acute inflammation has been used to evaluate anti-inflammatory effect of various extracts of barks of W. fruticosa, respectively.
Inflammation was produced in albino rats by injection of 0.1ml of 1% w/v formalin into the sub plantar region of left hind paw. The paw volume was measured using mercury displacement technique with the help of plethysmograph at 0 min, 30 and 60 min respectively. The effect of extracts 200mg/kg and reference drug analgin on formalin induced oedema after 1 hr showed more reduction in swelling. Maximum percentage inhibition had been found in aqueous extract (27.12%) of W. fruticosa bark in comparison to other extracts. Reference drug (analgin) % inhibition was found 21.5% (Table 3, Fig. 6).
FIG. 6: GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF PERCENTAGE INHIBITION OF PAW EDEMA OF W. FRUTICOSA BARK EXTRACTS
Ghante et al., and Baravalia et al., studied anti-inflammatory activity of W. fruticosa flowers in various animal Model. They found significant anti-inflammatory activity of methanolic extract in dose of 400 and 600mg/kg 17, 18. Verma et al., 2012 studied anti-inflammatory activity of 95% ethanolic extract of W. fruticosa flowers in dose of 250-500mg/kg in various model of acute, sub-acute, chronic and found positive activity and suggested in their work during the repair process of inflammation there are proliferations of macrophage, neutrophils, fibroblast and multiplication of small blood vessels which are formed highly vascularised reddish mass which is called granulated tissue 19. Anti-inflammatory activity of aqueous extract of W. fruticosa bark was shown significantly may be reducing of granuloma formation.
Preliminary phytochemical screening revealed that phyto-constituents present in bark were flavonoids, steroids, glycosides and tannin. Varieties of phytochemicals flavonoids, terpenoids, alkaloids and saponins are possess anti-inflammatory property 20. Flavonoids inhibits biosynthesis of prostaglandins which is the end product of COX and lipoxygenase pathways, which acts as a secondary messengers and are involved in various immunologic responses 21 - 23. Spectroscopic analysis and interpretation of spectrum data revealed that may be β- sitosterol present in plant bark. β- sitosterol shows properties of anti-inflammatory and anti-pyretic activity 24. The anti-inflammatory property of all extracts of Woodfordia fruticosa stem barks was may be due to the presence of β- sitosterol which could be the neutralization of release of histamine and serotonin.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion the neutralization of histamine and serotonin release on rat paw inflammation may be due to the presence of phytoconstituents flavonoid, and steroids glycosides or chemical compound β-sitosterol. Anti-inflammatory activity of aq. extract of W. fruticosa bark was shown significant may be due to the presence of β-sitosterol. This study has established that aqueous extract had maximum anti-inflammatory activity which can be important in drug development for formulation of single or multi herbal drugs especially in the area of inflammation.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT: Authors are grateful to Dr. S. H. Bodakhae, Associate Professor, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur, for helping laboratory work specially in pharmacological study on animals.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES:
- Yoshida T, Chou T, Natta A, Miyamoto K, Koshiura R and OkudaT: Woodfordin C, macro-ring hydrolysable tannin dimer with antitumor activity, and accompanying dimers from Woodfordia fruticosa Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 1990; 38(5):1211-7.
- Kadota S, Takamori Y, Nyein KN, Kikuchi T, Tanaka K and Ekimoto H: Constituents of the leaves of Woodfordia fruticosa Kurz isolation, structure, and proton and carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance signal assignments of woodfruticosin (woodfordin C), an inhibitor of deoxyribonucleic acid topoisomerase II. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 1990; 38: 1121.
- Nadkarni KM: Indian Plants and Drugs with their Medicinal Properties and uses. Asiatic publishing house, Delhi, 1998: 416-417.
- Basu K: Indian Medicinal Plants. oriental enterprises, 2001; 1494-1499.
- Rani S, Rahman K, Yuonis M and Basar SN: Dhawa ( fruticosa L. Kurz): A versatile medicinal plant. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Drug research 2015; 7: 315-320.
- Kumar D, Sharma M, Shorout A, Saroha K and Verma S: A review on its botany, chemistry and biological activities. Journal of Pharmacognosy and phytochemistry 2016; 293-298.
- Meena V and Kumar S: A high demand potential plant with potential medicinal value. Indian Journal of Plant Sciences 2015; 4: 100-106.
- Harbone JB: Phytochemical methods. A Guide to Modern Techniques of Plants Analysis. Chapman and Hall, London, New York, 1973: 182-189.
- Kokate CK: Practical Pharmacognosy. Vallabh Prakashan, New Delhi, 1991: 110-115.
- Turner R and Hebborn P: Screening methods in Pharmacology. Academic Press Publisher, INC. New York, 1971: 1: 23-65.
- Ghoss MN: Guide to Drug Doses in Laboratory Animals. In Fundamentals of Experimental Pharmacology. Edition 4, Kolkata, India, 2008: 243-56.
- Ghosh MN: Fundamental of experimental pharmacology. Hilton and Company, Edition 5, Kolkata, 2011: 188-189.
- Ghosh MN, Banerjee RM and Mukherji SK: Evaluation of anti-inflammatory agent. Indian Journal Physiolology and Pharmacology1963; 7: 17-21.
- Ferrero-miliani L, Neilson OH, Andersen PS and Girardin SE: Chronic inflammation: importance of NOD2 and NALP3 in interleukin-1 beta generation. Clinical Expremental Immunology 2007; 147(2): 227-35.
- Guang QZ, Huang XD, Wang H, Leungb AK, Chan CL, Fong DWF and Yub ZL: Anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects of the ethanol extract of Rosa multiflora Hips. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2008; 118: 290-294.
- Prakash BN, Pandikumar P and Ignacimuthu S: Anti-inflammatory activity of Albizia lebbeck Benth an ethnomedicinal plant in acute and chronic animal models of inflammation. Journal of Ethno-pharmacololy 2009; 25: 356-360.
- Ghante MH, Bhusari KP, Duranjkar NJ, Jain NS and Warokar AS: Bronchio-protective, bronchiodilatory and antiinflammatory activity of ethanolic extract of fruticosa flower. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and research 2012; 46: 168-72.
- Baravalia Y, Kumar YV and Chandra S: Brine shrimp cytotoxicity, anti-inflammatory, analgesic properties of fruticosa flowers. Iranian Journal of Pharma research 2012; 11: 854 - 861.
- Verma N, Amresh G, Shau PK, Mishra N, Rao CV and Singh AP: Antiinflammatory antinociceptive activity of hydroethanolic extract of fruticosa flowers. Der Pharmacia Sinica 2012; 3: 289-294.
- Selvum C, Jachak SM and Bhutani KK: Cyclooxygenase inhibitory flavonoids from the stem bark of Semecarpus anacardium Phytotherapy Research 2004; 18: 582-584.
- Min HP, Ching SL and Chi TH: Anti-inflammatory activity of natural dietary flavonoids. Food function 2010; 1: 15-31.
- Shaikh RU, Pund MM and Gacche RN: Evaluation of anti-inflammatory activity of selected medicinal plants used in Indian traditional medication system in vitro as well as in vivo. Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine 2016; 6: 355-361.
- Pushpangadan P, Ijinu TP and George V: Plant based anti-inflammatory secondary metabolites. Annals of Phytomedicine 2015; 4(1): 17-36.
- Patra A, Jha S, Murty PN and Sharon MA: Isolation and characterization of stigmast 5-en-3 β (B sitosterol) from the leaves of Hygrophila spinosa T Anders. International Journal of Pharma Sciences and research 2010; 1: 95-100.
How to cite this article:
Beck NR and Namdeo KP: Anti - inflammatory activity of extracts of Woodfordia fruticosa stems bark in animal models. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2017; 8(9): 3795-00.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.8(9).3795-00.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
19
3795-3800
562
1078
English
IJPSR
N. R. Beck* and K. P. Namdeo
S. L. T. Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India.
neeli05011974@gmail.com
31 January, 2017
21 June, 2017
25 June, 2017
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.8(9).3795-00
01 September, 2017