ANTI-INFLAMMATORY ACTIVITY OF STEM BARK OF TECOMA STANS (L.) JUSS. EX KUNTH AND ESTIMATION OF GALLIC ACID
HTML Full TextANTI-INFLAMMATORY ACTIVITY OF STEM BARK OF TECOMA STANS (L.) JUSS. EX KUNTH AND ESTIMATION OF GALLIC ACID
A. R. Bindu * 1 and Jimla Mariat John 2
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences 1, Centre for Professional and Advanced Studies, Cheruvandoor, Ettumanur P. O., Kottayam - 686631, Kerala, India.
JDT Islam College of Pharmacy 2, Vellimadukunnu P. O., Calicut - 673012, Kerala, India.
ABSTRACT: Tecoma stans is a well-known traditional plant in India. The plant can be used in diabetes, digestive problems, and rheumatism and as antimicrobial. The aim of the study is to evaluate the anti-inflammatory activity of extracts of the stem bark of Tecoma stans (L.) by in-vitro and in-vivo methods. Ethyl acetate and alcoholic extract showed better anti-inflammatory activity by Human red blood cell membrane stabilization method. These extracts were also found to have significant inhibition to the carrageenan induced rat paw oedema. The gallic acid, a phenolic acid identified in the ethyl acetate fraction may contribute to the anti-inflammatory activity. The amount of gallic acid present in the ethyl acetate fraction of Tecoma stans (L.) was found to be 1.021 ng/mg extract, by HPTLC. The study concludes that the anti-inflammatory activity of stem bark of Tecoma stans may be due to the phenolics present in the extracts. Further studies are suggested to isolate and identify the more components responsible for the activity.
Keywords: |
Tecomastans, HRBC, Carrageenan, Anti-inflammatory, Gallic acid
INTRODUCTION: Medicinal plants provide good remedies for human diseases and play a vital role in our day to day life. Indian systems of medicines are all based on the knowledge of drugs from plants. Inflammation is the response of living tissues to injury and it involves complex array of enzyme activation, mediator release and extravagations of fluid cell breakdown and repair. The non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opiates are currently available in the market are not useful in all cases because of their unwanted side effects.
Hence, search for other alternatives seems essential. Tecoma stans, an erect shrub or small tree comes from desert shrub-lands and dry forests in the region from Texas and Arizona southward to Argentina. It has become established in many parts of the Pacific and is naturalizing in South Florida. It is naturalized in most parts of India, planted in gardens in the plains throughout India and in the hills, up to an altitude of 1,500 m 1. The plant contains triterpenes, hydrocarbons, resins and a volatile oil.
Leaves of T. stans contains tecomine, tecostanine 2, indole oxygenase3, chysoeriol, luteolin, hyperoside4 and are antibacterial 5, antispasmodic 6, antidiabetic 7, 8, anticancer 9, anthelmintic 10 and wound healing 11. Floral extracts contain carotenoids 12, flavanone along with kaempferol 13, dihydroflavanols 14. T. stans contain iridoid glycoside, stansioside 15 and five alkaloids with actinide nucleus 16.
Stem bark is antimicrobial 17 and the volatile constituents 18 present were studied. Fruits contain two monoterpene alkaloids 19 and root contain iridoid compounds 5-deoxystaniosideplantarena- loside including luteolin, lupeol acetate and beta sitosterol 20. Taking into account the broad biological activity of T. stans, the present study was to evaluate the anti-inflammatory effects of different extracts of stem bark of T. stans.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Plant Materials: The stem bark of Tecoma stans (L.) Jussex. Kunth was collected from Thiruvalla, Kerala, India and authenticated by Dr. Joby Paul, Botanist, Environmental Sciences, M. G University, Kottayam (voucher specimen no: 895/SES/MGU).Voucher specimen was deposited in the Department of Pharmacognosy of our institution for future reference. The collected stem bark was dried in shade and used for the study. Stem bark was powdered and exhaustively extracted with ethanol in a Soxhlet extractor. The extract was concentrated to a solid residue and the yield was calculated. The total ethanolic extract was fractionated using the solvents in the order of increasing polarity like petroleum ether, benzene, chloroform and ethyl acetate. The marc obtained after total ethanolic extraction of the stem bark was subjected to aqueous extraction by reflux method. The extracts were concentrated to a solid residue and the yield was calculated.
Preliminary Phytochemical Study: All the extracts were subjected to determine the presence of chemical constituents by qualitative chemical tests.
In-vitro Anti-Inflammatory Activity by Human Red Blood Cell Membrane Stabilization: 21 Blood was collected from healthy human volunteer who was not taken any NSAIDS for 2 weeks prior to the experiment and mixed with equal volume of sterilized Alsever solution. The blood was centrifuged at 3000 rpm and packed cells were washed with isosaline and a 10% (v/v) suspension was made with isosaline (HRBC suspension). Extracts were prepared in distilled water and to each concentration 1 ml phosphate buffer, 2 ml hyposaline and 0.5 ml HRBC suspension were added. These were incubated at 37 ºC for 30 min and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 20 min.
The hemoglobin content in the supernatant solution was estimated spectrophotometrically at 560 nm. Diclofenac (100 mcg/ml) was used as the reference standard and a control was prepared. The percentage of HRBC membrane stabilization or protection was calculated using the formula.
% protection =100 - O.D of drug treated sample/O.D of control}× 100
In-vivo Anti-Inflammatory Activity by Carrageenan Induced Rat Paw Edema Method:
Selection of Animals: The animals were housed in ventilated cages and fed with pellted diet and water ad libitum and maintained at 37 ºC and 12/12 h light/dark cycle. Albino wistar rats (200-250 g) were housed in standard environmental conditions. Female Albino wistar rats were used for acute toxicity study in accordance with OECD guidelines 423. Male wistar rats were used for carrageenan induced rat paw edema model. The experiments were carried out after obtaining approval from the Institutional Animal Ethical Committee of our institution (no. IAEC/MGU/CHE-M.Pharm/012/ 2009dtd 21-12-2009).
Acute Toxicity Study on Tecoma stans (L.) Extracts: 22 Female Albino wistar rats were divided into 2 groups of 3 animals each. Group I - ethyl acetate extract and Group II - alcoholic extract. Ethyl acetate and residual alcoholic extract of T. stans were suspended in distilled water and administered orally 2000 mg/kg.
In-vivo Anti-Inflammatory Activity by Carrageenan Induced Rat Paw Edema Method: 23 Animals were divided into six groups each composed of six animals. Ethyl acetate and residual alcoholic extract was used for in-vivo study as they have shown good anti-inflammatory activity by in-vitro analysis. Group I served as control (1% SCMC 10 ml/kg p.o.). Group II and III received ethyl acetate fraction at the dose of 200 and 400 mg/kg p.o. respectively. Group IV and V received total alcoholic extract at the dose of 200 and 400mg/kg p.o. respectively. Group VI served as standard (Diclofenac sodium 10 mg/kg p.o.).
Percentage inhibition of edema = [(100 - Vt)/Vc] × 100
Vc - the inflammatory increase in paw volume in control animals and Vt in drug treated animals.
Paw oedema was induced by injecting 0.1 ml of 1% carrageenan in physiological saline into sub plantar tissues of hind paw of each rat. Ethyl acetate and alcoholic extracts were administered orally 30 min prior to carrageenan administration. The paw volume was measured at intervals of 60, 120, 180, 240 min by the mercury displacement method using a plethysmograph. The percentage inhibition of paw volume in drug treated group was compared with the carrageenan control group.
Statistical Analysis: Data obtained were expressed as mean ± S.D. of 6 animals in each group. Difference between the control and the treatments were tested for significance using ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s t-test. Data were considered significant when p values were lower than 0.05.
Quantification of Gallic Acid in Ethyl Acetate Extract of Tecoma stans (L.) Juss. Ex Kunth: The Co-TLC studies were conducted by using various solvent systems, with the ethyl acetate extract and gallic acid, standard. The solvent system toluene: ethyl acetate: formic acid (6:4:0.8), gave the identification of gallic acid, in the extract. Based on the Rf value obtained by TLC analysis of the ethyl acetate fraction, HPTLC of the same fraction was carried out to estimate the amount of gallic acid in the same fraction. CAMAG HPTLC system was used. Gallic acid at a concentration 0.1mg/ml was prepared and used as stock solution. From the standard stock solution 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 μL, corresponding to 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000ng/ml respectively was spotted on pre-coated silica gel plates in the HPTLC system and a calibration curve was obtained. The ethyl acetate extract was taken at 1mg/ml concentration and 20, 30 μL were applied on the same TLC plates. The plates were dried and developed in twin trough chamber using the solvent system, toluene: ethyl acetate: formic acid (6:4:0.8). After development, the plates were further dried and observed under UV at 280 nm 24. The calibration curve of gallic acid and chromatogram of standard and sample were obtained. From the calibration curve the amount of Gallic acid in the sample was determined.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Extraction and Preliminary Phytochemical Screening: Percentage yield of the extracts were found to be total ethanolic extract -17.5%, petroleum ether fraction- 8.2%, chloroform fraction- 4.4%, ethyl acetate fraction- 3.4% and aqueous extract- 10.83% w/w. Qualitative phyto-chemical studies showed the presence of alkaloid, carbohydrates, flavonoids, sterols, tannins and phenolics. Petoleum ether fraction showed presence of sterols and terpenoids. Alkaloids, terpenoids and flavonoids were present in chloroform fraction, whereas flavonoids, tannins and phenolics were present in ethyl acetate fraction. Aqueous extract was found to contain carbohydrates, flavonoids and saponins.
In-vitro Anti-inflammatory Activity: The total alcoholic extract, petroleum ether, chloroform, ethyl acetate fractions of total alcoholic extract and aqueous extracts of the stem bark of Tecoma stans (L.) were studied for in-vitro anti-inflammatory activity by HRBC membrane stabilization method and the results are depicted in Fig. 1.
FIG. 1: INHIBITION OF INFLAMMATION BY HRBC MEMBRANE STABILIZATION
PE- Petroleum ether fraction, CH-Chloroform fraction, EA-Ethyl acetate fraction, AL-Total alcoholic extract, AQ-Aqueous extract STD-Standard.
Among all the extracts, ethyl acetate and alcoholic extracts showed significant in-vitro anti-inflammatory activity in a concentration dependent manner. Ethyl acetate extract at a concentration of 1000 mcg/ml showed 57.15% protection and alcoholic extract at a concentration of 1000 mcg/ml showed 48.98% protection of HRBC in hypotonic solution. All the results were compared with standard diclofenac which showed 71.43% protection. The lysosomal enzymes released during inflammation produced a variety of disorders. The extra cellular activity of these enzymes is said to be related to acute or chronic inflammation. The NSAIDs act either by inhibiting these lysosomal enzymes or by stabilizing the lysosomal membrane.
Since, HRBC is similar to lysosomal membrane components, the prevention of hypotonicity induced HRBC membrane lysis is taken as a measure of anti-inflammatory activity of the drugs. Hypotonicity-induced haemolysis may arise from shrinkage of the cells due to osmotic loss of intracellular electrolyte and fluid components 21. The extract may inhibit the processes which may stimulate or enhance the efflux of these intracellular components.
Acute Toxicity Study of Tecoma stans (Linn.): Acute toxicity studies of the ethyl acetate and alcoholic extracts of Tecoma stans (L.) at 2000 mg/kg body weight in the two groups of rats for 14 days did not produce any mortality. There were no significant changes in the body weight and food consumption of animals of both groups indicating the safety of both the extracts of Tecoma stans (L.) in the experimental species.
In-vivo Anti-inflammatory Activity: Since, ethyl acetate and alcoholic extract showed significant in-vitro anti-inflammatory activity, they were selected for the evaluation of in-vivo anti-inflammatory activity by carrageenan induced rat paw oedema model. The results of animal model are exhibited in Table 1.
TABLE 1: IN-VIVO ANTI-INFLAMMATORY ACTIVITY BY CARRAGEENANINDUCED RAT PAW OEDEMA METHOD
Groups | Paw volume in ml (% inhibition of edema) | |||
60 min | 120 min | 180 min | 240 min | |
Gr. I | 0.64 ± 0.01 | 0.72 ± 0.03 | 0.66 ± 0.03 | 0.58 ± 0.02 |
Gr. II (200 mg/kg) | 0.51* ± 0.04 (20.3) | 0.45* ± 0.04 (37.5) | 0.33* ± 0.04 (50.0) | 0.20* ± 0.03 (65.5) |
Gr. III (400 mg/kg) | 0.47** ± 0.03 (26.5) | 0.37** ± 0.01 (48.6) | 0.27** ± 0.02 (59.0) | 0.17** ± 0.01 (70.6) |
Gr. IV (200 mg/kg) | 0.52* ± 0.02 (21.8) | 0.46* ± 0.03 (36.1) | 0.34* ± 0.03 (48.4) | 0.28* ± 0.03 (51.7) |
Gr. V (400 mg/kg) | 0.49* ± 0.03 (23.4) | 0.42* ± 0.02 (41.6) | 0.31* ± 0.01 (53.3) | 0.22* ± 0.03 (60.3) |
Gr. VI (Std) | 0.44** ± 0.04 (31.2) | 0.35** ± 0.03 (51.3) | 0.21** ± 0.02 (68.1) | 0.12** ± 0.01 (79.3) |
Values are Mean ± SD of 6 animals in each group. Comparisons were made between Group 1 vs. 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. P-values *P<0.05, *P<0.01. Percentage protection given on Parenthesis. Difference between the control and the treatments were tested for significance using ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s t-test. Gr. I-control, Gr. II & III- Ethyl acetate fraction, Gr-IV & V- Total alcoholic extract.
Carrageenan induced rat paw edema is a suitable animal model for evaluating anti-odematous effect of natural products 25. The ethyl acetate fraction at the dose of 400 mg/kg showed high significant activity at 4 h, where it caused 70.6% oedema inhibition and alcoholic extract at the dose of 400mg/kg caused 60.3% inhibition as compared to that of 79.3% oedema inhibition caused by 10mg/kg of diclofenac sodium. This acute inflammation model is a biphasic event. The early phases of (1-2 h) the carrageenan model is mainly mediated by histamine, serotonin and increased synthesis of prostaglandins in the damaged tissue surroundings. The late phase is sustained by prostaglandin release and mediated by bradykinin, leukotrienes, polymorphonuclear cells and prostaglandins produced by tissue macrophages 26.
The later phase is reported to be sensitive to most of the clinically effective anti-inflammatory agents. The mediator appears to be prostaglandins. The carrageenan induced paw edema model in rats is known to be sensitive to cycloxygenase inhibitors and has been used to evaluate the effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents 27.
Significantly high anti-inflammatory activity of ethyl acetate extract and alcoholic extract of Tecoma stans (L.) may be due to inhibition of the mediators of inflammation such as histamine, serotonin and prostaglandin.
In the present study, the anti-inflammatory activity of the ethyl acetate and alcoholic extracts of Tecoma stans (L.) stem bark has been established. Carrageenan induced inflammation is useful in detecting orally active anti-inflammatory agents.
Estimation of Gallic Acid in Ethyl Acetate Extract by HPTLC: Gallic acid showed single peak in HPTLC chromatogram. The calibration curve of gallic acid Fig. 2 was prepared by plotting the concentration of gallic acid versus average area of the peak over the range 200-1000 μg/spot. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.9993. The amount of gallic acid found in the ethyl acetate fraction of Tecoma stans (L.) was determined densitometrically by HPTLC. The amount of gallic acid found in the ethyl acetate extract was found to be 1.021 ng/mg extract. Chromatogram of ethyl acetate fraction of T. stans is given in Fig. 3.
CONCLUSION: Among all the extracts, ethyl acetate and alcoholic extracts showed significant in-vitro anti-inflammatory activity in a concentration dependent manner, by HRBC membrane stabilization method. The extracts were found to have significant inhibition to the carrageenan induced rat paw oedema. The anti-inflammatory activity of the plant may be attributed to the presence of significantly high concentrations of the phenolics and flavonoids. The gallic acid, a phenolic acid identified in the ethyl acetate extract may contribute significantly to the anti-inflammatory activity.
In the present study, the anti-inflammatory activity of the ethyl acetate and alcoholic extracts of Tecoma stans (L.) stem bark has been established. However, further phytochemical studies can be done for the isolation of compound(s) from the active fraction to examine the underlying mechanism of these activities.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The authors are thankful to ITL Labs Ltd., Bangalore for providing the necessary facilities of the study.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES:
- The Wealth of India. Tecoma stans. Publication and information Directorate CSIR, New Delhi, Edition 3rd, Vol.10, 1988: 134-136.
- Youssef H, Michel P and Le MJ: Alkaloids from the Bignoniaceae species Tecoma stans. II. Isolation of tecostanine. Annales Pharmaceutiques Francaises 1963; 21(9-10): 699-702.
- Satya KP and Vaidyanathan CS: Purification of indole oxygenase from the leaves of Tecoma stans by affinity chromatography. Biochemistry International 1983; 7(5): 647-53.
- Ramesh P, Nair AGR and Subramanian SS: Flavonoids of Tecoma stans. Fitotherapia 1986; 57(4): 281-2.
- Ramesh T, Anusha V and Kumar AR: Antibacterial activity of the methanolic extract of Tecoma stans. International Journal of Chemical Sci 2009; 7(1): 6-8.
- Naseri GMK, Moghaddam AM and Bahadoram S: Anti-spasmodic effect of Tecoma stans(L.) Juss leaf extract on rat ileum. DARU 2007; 15(3): 123-128.
- Anguilar-Santamaria L, Ramirez G, Nicasio P, Alegria-Reyes C and Herrera-Arellano A: Antidiabetic activities of Tecoma stans (L.) Juss. exKunth. Journal of ethnopharmacology 2009; 124(2): 284-8.
- Ibarra MJ, Pedro CC, Maria VJ and Azucena O: Phyto-chemical characterization and hypoglycemic effect of the Tecoma stans and its relationship to the presence of chromium as a factor for glucose tolerance. Informacion Tecnologica 2009; 20(5): 55-65.
- Dodgra P, Avinash U, Jaishree R, Mashita P, B Deovrat, Sunita B and Jinu J: Study of antibacterial and anticancer activity of selected trifoliate plants. Biofrontiers 2009; 2(1): 11-15.
- Kumanan R, Sridhar C, Jayaveera KN, Sudha S, Rubesh Kumar S and Duganath N: Comparative study of anthelmintic activity of different leaf extracts of Tecoma stans (L.) on adult indian earthworms. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research 2010; 2(2): 63-65.
- Das C, Mohanty A, Sahoo DC and Dash S: Wound healing potential of methanolic extract of Tecoma stans Linn, Leaf. Drug Invention Today 2010; 2(8): 373-375.
- Premachandra BR, John J and Cama HR: Carotenoids in the flower petals of Tecoma stans. Indian Journal of Nutrition and Diabetics 1974; 11(1): 28-32.
- Srivastava BK, Reddy MVRK: A new flavanone from the flowers of Tecoma stans. Oriental Journal of Chemistry 1994; 10(1): 81-2.
- Srivastava BK, Reddy MVRK: Flavonoids from the flower extract of Tecoma stans. Asian Journal of Chemistry 1995; 7(3): 679-680.
- Armandodoriano B, Marcella G, Carlo L, Trogolo M, James OU and Anna F: Isolation of stansioside, a new iridoidglucoside from Tecoma stans, and reassignment of the stereochemistry of the C(8) center of tecomoside. Gazzette Chimica Italiana 1982; 112(5-6): 199-203.
- Armando C, Raida H and Wasse M: Preliminary pharmacognostic and phytochemical study of Tecoma stans Revista Cubana de Farmacia 1991; 25(2): 131-6.
- Binutu OA and Lajubutu BA: Antibacterial potentials of some plant species of the Bignoniaceae family. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 1985; 14(1): 1-9.
- Vanquez C, Arambula A, Chu YY, Patricia G, Chaudhari AR and Gonzalez EE: Analysis of volatile chemical constituents in Cacaliade composita (Matarique), Geranium robertianum (Hierba San Roberto) and Tecoma stans (Tronadora) used in Mexican folk medicine for the treatment of type II diabetes. Abstracts of Papers, 237th ACS National Meeting, US, 2009; 87.
- Paulino LA and D’arc FJ: Monoterpene alkaloids from Tecoma stans. Phytochemistry 1993; 34(3): 876-8.
- Ganapathy S, Nyamathulla S, Srilakshmi GVK and Kumar PVR: Iridoid compounds and antimicrobial activity of the roots of Tecoma stans (L.) Juss. Asian Journal of Chemistry 2008; 20(6): 4493-4497.
- Vadivu R and Lakshmi KS: In-vitro and in-vivo anti-inflammatory activity of leaves of Symplocos chinensis Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology 2008; 3: 121-124.
- OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals. 423. Acute oral toxicity-Acute toxic class method. Organisation for economic cooperation and development, Paris. 2001.
- Winter CA and Poster CC: Effect of alteration in side chain up on anti - inflammatory and liver glycogen activities in hydrocortisone ester. Journal of American pharmaceutical association 1957; 46(9): 515-9.
- Leela V and Saraswathy A: Quantification of Pharma-cologically active markers gallic acid, quercetin and lupeol from acacia leucophloea wild flowers by HPTLC method. Journal of Analytical and Bioanalytical Techniques 2013; 4:160.doi: 10.4172/2155-9872.1000160.
- Panthong A et al.: Anti-inflammatory and antipyretic properties of Clerodendrum petasites Moore. Journal of Ethanopharmacology 2003; 85: 151-156.
- Babu RB and Gottumukkala KM: Study of analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity of different fractions from Kydia calycina International Journal of Research in Pharmacology and Pharmacothera 2014; 3(1): 14-27.
- Rahman H, Vakati K and Eswariah C: In-vivo and in-vitro antiinflammatory activity of Aquillaria agallocha International Journal of Basic Medical Sciences and Pharmacy 2012; 2(1): 7-10.
How to cite this article:
Bindu AR and John JM: Anti-inflammatory activity of stem bark of Tecoma stans (L.) Juss. Ex Kunth and estimation of gallic acid. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2018; 9(12): 5271-76. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(12).5271-76.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
30
5271-5276
355
900
English
IJPSR
A. R. Bindu * and J. M. John
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Centre for Professional and Advanced Studies, Cheruvandoor, Kottayam, Kerala, India.
sindhuchandrasen@gmail.com
17 April, 2018
19 June, 2018
26 June, 2018
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(12).5271-76
01 December, 2018