ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITIES OF TRIGONELLA FOENUM-GRAECUM AND ZINGIBER OFFICINALE
HTML Full TextANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITIES OF TRIGONELLA FOENUM-GRAECUM AND ZINGIBER OFFICINALE
Mamta Bhatia* and Alka Sharma
Department of Food Technology, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar-125021, Haryana, India
ABSTRACT
An in vitro study was conducted for screening antibacterial activities of seeds of Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)and rhizomes of Zingiber officinale (ginger), in their different forms viz. aqueous extracts, essential oils and powders against some common food borne pathogens. Bacterial strains involved in the study were Bacillus cereus (MTCC 430), Enterococcus feacalis (MTCC 439), Escherichia coli (MTCC 1687), Psuedomonas aeruginosa (MTCC 424) and Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC 5021). Results revealed that powdered forms of T. foenum-graecum and Z. officinale remained ineffective in arresting the growth of all the bacterial strains under investigation. During preliminary screening, aqueous extracts and essential oils of test spices did not exhibit any growth inhibitory zone towards any test bacteria. In broth dilution technique, essential oil of Z. officinale arrested all the bacterial strains under observation while essential oil of T. foenum-graecum and aqueous extracts of T. foenum-graecum and Z. officinale remained ineffective.
Keywords:
Antibacterial activity, Trigonella foenum-graecum, Zingiber officinale, Pathogens, Bacterial strains, |
Aqueous extracts
INTRODUCTION: Current economic and biological assessment upon withdrawal of most of the conventional synthetic preservatives registered for control of microorganisms implicated in food spoilage have elicited widespread interest in providing new perspectives for the development of future antimicrobials based on natural substances, those are socially more acceptable 1. According to the council for Agriculture Science and Technology, an international consortium of 36 scientific and professional societies, many biologically derived substances from plant and animal sources exhibit antimicrobial properties in foods in which normally they are found or may be developed for commercial use as preservative to other food products. Biologicals, because of their natural origin, are biodegradable and mostly do not leave toxic residues or byproducts to contaminate the environment and spices are one among them.
T. foenum-graecum (fenugreek) is an important spice in India, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Armenia and Turkey. Trigonella seeds are bitter, mucilaginous, aromatic, tonic, emollient, anticarcinogenic 2, anti inflammatory 3, hypoglycaemic 4, hepatoprotective 5, immuno- modulatory 6, larvicidal 7 and wound healing activities 8. These are rich source of phytochemicals, especially the steroidal saponins (chiefly composed of diosgenin), which are the starting compounds for the manufacture of over 60% of the total steroid drugs by the pharmaceutical industry .
Z. officinale (ginger) is generally consumed as fresh paste and dried powder in culinary practices and for flavoring tea. The pungent compounds of Z. officinale include gingerols, shogaols, paradols and zingerone 9,. Rhizomes of Z. officinale and its constituents have been proven for their antioxidant 10 and antiplatelet efficacies 11.
Present study focuses on the growth inhibitory activities of T. foenum-graecum and Z. officinale towards some common food borne pathogens.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Procurement of Spice Samples: Dried seeds of T. foenum graecum were procured in a single lot, in the amounts of 500 g, from a wholesaler spice-seller, local market, Hisar, India. Procured seeds were cleaned manually for extraneous material and were ground to powdered form in laboratory grinder. Fresh rhizomes of Z. officinale (rhizomes) were purchased in the amounts of 1 kg, from grocery shop, local market, Hisar, India. Z. officinale rhizomes were washed with distilled water to remove extraneous matter followed by their peeling and drying in shade for 5 days. Dried rhizomes thus obtained were ground to powdered form. Commercial preparations of essential oils of T.foenum graecum and Z. officinalewere used.
Chemicals and Culture Media: Ethyl violet azide dextrose agar, Ethyl violet azide dextrose broth, MacConkey agar, MacConkey agar, MacConkey broth, Nutrient agar and Nutrient broth were obtained from Hi-Media Pvt. Ltd, India. Dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO) and Sodium chloride (NaCl) were purchaged from Central drug house Pvt. Limited, India.
Bacterial cultures: Pure cultures of Bacillus cereus (MTCC 430), Enterococcus feacalis (MTCC439), Escherichia coli (MTCC 1687), Psuedomonas aeruginosa (MTCC 424) and Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC 5021) were obtained from Microbial Type Culture Collection (MTCC), Institute of Microbial Technology (IMTECH), Chandigarh, India. The reference bacterial strains were maintained on respective media slants, subcultured bimonthly to maintain their viability and were stored at 4±1°C.Bacterial strains were adjusted with sterilized normal saline to contain approximately 1×107 cfu/ml (used as inoculum for experiments). Incubation temperatures, incubation periods and media used for test microbes are mentioned in Table 1.
TABLE 1: BACTERIAL STRAINS TESTED
Bacterial strains | Strain number | Media used | Temperature of incubation | Time period of incubation |
B. cereus | MTCC 430 | Nutrient agar, Nutrient broth | 300C | 24-48 h. |
E. faecalis | MTCC 439 | Ethyl violet azide dextrose agar,
Ethyl violet azide dextrose broth |
450C | 24-48 h. |
E. coli | MTCC 1687 | MacConkey agar, MacConkey broth | 450C | 24-48 h. |
P. aeruginosa | MTCC 424 | Nutrient agar, Nutrient broth | 320C | 24-48h. |
S. aureus | MTCC 5021 | Nutrient agar, Nutrient broth | 370C | 24-48 h. |
Prepearation of Aqueous Spice Extracts: Aqueous extracts were prepared in the laboratory 12. Powdered spice samples of T. foenum-graecum and Z. officinale were steeped overnight (temperature: 24-27°C) in sterilized distilled water in a ratio of 1:1 (w:v), followed by their homogenization in a blender at high speed for 2 min. The homogenized spice mixtures were filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper. Filtrates thus obtained, were sterilized by passing through syringe filters containing 0.45 um pore size membrane filters and were collected in sterilized glass vials.
Determination of antibacterial activities of test spice samples: Spice agar method 13 was opted for investigating antibacterial activities of powdered forms of test spices at their different concentration levels (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0%, (w/v)). The petriplates supplemented with abovestated spice concentrations were examined for bacterial growth at an interval of 12 hours, for an incubation period of 30 days.
Similar sets of experiments were conducted without any spice sample that served as negative control. Agar well assay 14 was used for the preliminary screening of aqueous extracts (50, 80, 100 (ul/well)) and essential oils (30ul/well) of reference spices against bacterial strains under observation. Dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO) served as negative control.
Results were expressed as net zones of inhibition. Broth dilution technique 15 was followed for the better insight into the antibacterial activities of test spice samples (aqueous extacts and essential oils). Test substances were used at various concentration levels viz. 2000, 1000, 500, 250, 125, 62.50, 31.25, 15.62, 7.81, 3.90, 1.95, 0.97, 0.48, 0.24, 0.12, 0.06 ul/ml; and the concentrations, at which bacterial growth was fully inhibited, were recorded. Dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO) served as negative control. All the abovementioned experiments were conducted in triplicates results obtained were highly reproducible.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The results revealed that powdered forms of T. foenum-graecum and Z. officinale upto 6.0% level (w/v), remained ineffective in arresting the growth of bacterial strains under observation, and visible growth of all the bacterial strains was noticed on 2nd day of incubation as in control set of petriplates containing no spice sample (Table 2). The potential of spices in the culinary, non culinary and medicinal fields is based on the chemistry and composition of their volatile aromatic secretions generally known as essential oils. Seeds of T. foenum-graecum contain 0.02-0.05% essential oil 16, while rhizomes of Z. officinale are composed of 2-3 % essential oil 17. The inertness of powdered forms may be attributed to very high volatility and subsequent losses of antimicrobial components during grinding and drying. Composition of fresh and dried rhizomes of Z. officinale was determined by Gas chromatography (GC) and GC-MS techniques and it was observed that fresh rhizomes usually contain a greater proportion of the lower boiling components and up to 80% of the volatile components can be lost during drying 18. During preliminary screening aqueous extracts (50, 80, 100 (ul/well)) and essential oils (30 ul/well) of both the test spices did not exhibit any growth inhibitory zone towards any reference bacterial strain (Table 3).
However, from the results of broth dilution technique, it was found that essential oil of Z. officinale at different concentrations viz. 250 (ul/ml), 1000 (ul/ml), 2000 (ul/ml), 1000 (ul/ml), 250 ( ul/ml) inhibited B. cereus, E. faecalis, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus respectively, while essential oil of T. foenum-graecum and aqueous extracts of T. foenum-graecum and Z . officinale could not arrest test bacteria (Table 4). It was also noticed that g+ve bacterial strains were inhibited at lower concentration levels of essential oil of Z. officinale. This differential behaviour of test microbes may be attributed to their different membrane structures and their relative permeability towards substrate components 19, 20. The sensitivity of microbes towards essential oil of Z. officinale followed the following order : B. cereus = S. aureus > E. faecalis = P. aeruginosa > E.coli.
TABLE 2: INHIBITORY EFFECTS OF POWDERED FORMS OF T. FOENUM-GRAECUM AND Z. OFFICINALE ON THE GROWTH OF BACTERIAL STRAINS
Spice Conc.
(%,w/v) |
Days of inhibition | |||||||||
B. cereus | E. faecalis | E. coli | P. aeruginosa | S. aureus | ||||||
T. f-g. | Z.o. | T. f-g. | Z.o. | T. f-g. | Z.o. | T. f-g. | Z.o. | T. f-g. | Z.o. | |
0.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
0.1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
0.2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
0.4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
0.6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
0.8 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
1.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
1.5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
2.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
2.5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
3.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
3.5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
4.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
4.5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
5.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
5.5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
6.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
T. f-g : Trigonella foenum-graecum; Z. o.: Zingiber officinale
TABLE 3: INHIBITORY EFFECTS OF AQUEOUS EXTRACTS AND ESSENTIAL OILS OF REFERENCE SPICES ON BACTERIAL STRAINS (AGAR-WELL ASSAY)
Bacterial strains | Zones of Inhibition (mm) | ||||||||
Essential oils (30 ul) | Aqueous extracts | ||||||||
(50 ul) | (80 ul) | (100 ul)/’][= | |||||||
T.f.-g. | Z.o. | T.f.-g. | Z.o. | T.f.-g. | Z.o. | T.f.-g. | Z.o. | ||
B.cereus | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
E. faecalis | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
E. coli | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
P. aeruginosa | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
S. aureus | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
T.f-g : Trigonella foenum-graecum, Z.o.: Zingiber officinale, DMSO: Dimethylsulphoxide
TABLE 4: INHIBITORY EFFECTS OF AQUEOUS EXTRACTS AND ESSENTIAL OILS OF REFERENCE SPICES ON BACTERIAL STRAINS (BROTH DILUTION TECHNIQUE)
Test substances | Spices | Bacterial strains | ||||
B.cereus | E.faecalis | E.coli | P.aeruginosa | S.aureus | ||
Aqueous extract
(ul/ml) |
T.f.-g. | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
Z.o. | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
Essential oil
(ul/ml) |
T.f.-g. | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
Z.o. | 250.00 | 1000.00 | 2000.00 | 1000.00 | 250.00 | |
DMSO
(ul/ml) |
- | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
T.f-g : Trigonella foenum-graecum, Z.o.: Zingiber officinale, DMSO: Dimethylsulphoxide, ND: Not Detected
CONCLUSION: The results of this in vitro study indicate that among all the spice forms tested, only essential oil of Zingiber officinale arrested food borne pathogens effectively and hence, it may be considered for further studies (in vitro and in vivo ), against other microbes of spoilage and health significance.
References
- Schuenzel M and Harrison MA, 2002: Microbial antagonists of food borne pathogens on minimally processed vegetables. Journal of Food Protection 65:1909-1915.
- Devasena T and Menon VP, 2003: Fenugreeek affects the activity of b-glucoronidase and mucinase in the colon. Phytotherapy Research 17: 1088–1091.
- Ahmadiani A, Javan M, Semnanian S, Barat E and Kamalineyad M, 2001: Antiinflammatory and antipyretic effects of Trigonella foenum graecum leaf extracts in rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 75: 283–286.
- Hannan JM, Ali L, Rokeya B, Khaleque J, Akhter M, Flatt PR and Abdel-Wahab YH, 2007: Soluble dietary fibre fraction of Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek) seed improves glucose homeostasis in animal models of type 1 and type 2 diabetes by delaying carbohydrate digestion and absorption, and enhancing insulin action. British Journal of Nutrition 97: 514–521.
- Kaviarasan S and Anuradha CV, 2007: Fenugreek seed polyphenols protect liver from alcohol toxicity: a role on hepatic detoxification system and apoptosis. Pharmazie 62: 299–304.
- Bin-Hafeez, Haque R, Parvez S, Pandey S, Sayeed I and Raisuddin S, 2003: Immunomodulatory effect of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum L.) extract in mice. International Immunopharmacology 3: 257–265.
- Harve G and Kamath V, 2004: Larvicidal activity of plant extracts used alone and in combination with non synthetic larvicidal agents against Aedes aegypti. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 42: 1216-1219.
- Taranalli AD and Kuppast IJ, 1996: Study of wound healing activity of seeds of Trigonella foenum-graecum in rats. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 58: 117–119.
- Nobrega LP, Monteiro AR, Meireles MAA and Marques MOM, 1997: Comparison of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) oleoresin obtained with ethanol and isopropanol with that obtained with pressurized CO2. Cienciae Tecnologia de Alimentos 17: 408–412.
- Kikuzaki H and Nakatani N, 1993: Antioxidant effects of some ginger constituents. Journal of Food Science 58: 1407–1410.
- Guh JH, Ko FN, Jong TT and Teng CM, 1995: Antiplatelet effect of gingerol isolated from Zingiber officinale. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 47: 329–332.
- Yin MC and Cheng WS, 1998: Inhibition of Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus flavus by some herbs and spices. Journal of Food Protection 61:123-125.
- Bullerman LB and Azzouz MA, 1982: Comparative antimycotic effects of selected herbs, spices, plant components and commercial antifungal agents. Journal of Food Protection 45 :1298-1301.
- Iroegbu CU and Nkere, 2005: Evaluation of the antibacterial properties of Picralima nitida stem bark extracts. International Journal of Molecular Medicine and Advance Science 1:182-189.
- Kikuzaki H and Nakatani N, 1993: Antioxidant effects of some ginger constituents. Journal of Food Science 58: 1407–1410.
- Ramachandraia OS, Reddy PN, Azeemoddin G, Ramayya DA and Rao SDT, 1986: Essential and fatty oil content in umbelliferous and fenugreek seeds of Andhra Pradesh habitat. Indian Cocoa, Arecanut and Spices Journal 10: 12.
- Yu Z, Wu HM and Ding JK, 1998: The volatile chemical components of fresh Zingiber officinale. Acta Botanica Yunnanica 20: 113–118.
- Antonious GF and Kochhar TS, 2003: Zingiberene and curcumene in wild tomato. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B, Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes 38: 489–500.
- Carson CF, Mee BJ and Riley TV, 2002: Mechanism of action of Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil on Staphylococcus aureus determined by time-kill, lysis, leakage and salt tolerance assays and electron microscopy. Antimicrobial Agentsand Chemotherapy 46:1914–1920.
- Skandamis P, Koutsoumanis K, Fasseas K and Nychas GJE, 2001: Inhibition of oregano essential oil and EDTA on Escherichia coli O157: H7. Italian Journal of Food Science 13: 65– 75.
How to cite this article:
Bhatia M and Sharma A: Antibacterial Activities of Trigonella foenum-graecum and Zingiber officinale. Int J Pharm Sci Res, 2012; Vol. 3(9): 3228-3232
Article Information
42
3228-3232
640KB
1072
English
IJPSR
Mamta Bhatia* and Alka Sharma
Department of Food Technology, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology, Hisar-125021, Haryana, India
bhatiamamta09@gmail.com
14 May, 2012
02 June, 2012
25 August, 2012
http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.3(9).3228-32
01 September, 2012