ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY FROM BARK EXTRACTS OF PTEROSPERMUM ACERIFOLIUM (L.) WILLD.
HTML Full TextANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY FROM BARK EXTRACTS OF PTEROSPERMUM ACERIFOLIUM (L.) WILLD.
S K Panda* and S K Dutta
P G Department of Zoology, North Orissa University, Baripada, Orissa, India
ABSTRACT
Although there are many studies on antimicrobial activities of different plants, there is no report on antibacterial activity of Pterospermum acerifolium (Sterculiaceae). Therefore, a microbiological study was conducted to detect antibacterial activity of P. acerifolium. Successive ethanolic extract of bark of P. acerifolium were fractionated with hexane, butanol, methanol and water. In vitro antibacterial activity was tested by using agar cup and minimum inhibitory concentration method against S. aureus, B. lichenoformis, B. subtilis, E. coli, P. florescence, P. aeruginosa, and S. typhimurium. Although all five extracts showed promising antibacterial activity against test bacterial species, yet maximum activity was observed in butanol extract. S. aureus was the most sensitive strain. MIC values for most of the extracts ranged from 0.312 to 5.0 mg/ml; while the least MBC value was observed at 2.5 mg/ml. Phytochemical analysis exhibited the presence of alkaloids, tannin and phenolic compounds, flavonoids, glycosides, saponins, steroid & sterols and triterpenoids in different extracts. This could justify their use in treatment of microbial infections in man and livestock.
Keywords:
Similipal Biosphere Reserve, Pterospermum acerifolium, MIC, |
Sterculiaceae
INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial resistance has become a global problem. There has been an increasing incidence of multiple resistances in human pathogenic microorganisms in recent years, largely due to indiscriminate use of commercial antimicrobial drugs commonly employed in the treatment of infectious diseases. Strategies to improve the current situation include research in finding new and innovative antimicrobials 1. This has forced scientists to search for new antimicrobial substances from different sources especially medicinal plants 2.
The screening of plant extracts and plant products for antimicrobial activity has shown that higher plants represent a potential source of novel antibiotic prototypes 3. Numerous studies have identified compounds within plants that are effective antibiotics 4. Traditional healing systems around the world that utilize herbal remedies are an important source for the discovery of new antibiotics 5. In 1997, the 30th World Health Assembly adopted a resolution urging interested governments to utilize their traditional systems of medicine with regulations suited to their national health care systems.
Some traditional remedies have already produced compounds that are effective against antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria 6. Infectious diseases account for approximately one-half of all deaths in tropical countries. In industrialized nations, despite the progress made in the understanding of microorganisms and their control, incidence of the epidemics due to drug-resistant microorganisms and the emergence of unknown disease causing microorganisms, pose enormous public health concerns 7.
Antibiotics and the chemotherapeutic agents have been of value in controlling many infections but they depend on judicious use to minimize the incidence of resistant forms. A considerable percentage of the peoples in both developed and developing nations use medicinal plant remedies. In the industrialised countries, consumers are seeking visible alternatives to modern medicine where there is already a problem of over-medication; accompanied by development of resistance to same 8.
Pterospermum acerifolium L. Willd (Sterculiaceae) commonly known as ‘Muchukunda’ is a large decidious tree distributed in tropical Asia. It has been traditionally used for blood troubles, inflammation, ulcer, tumors, leprosy and for small pox eruptions 9. Flowers are used as a general tonic, antitumor agent, analgesic and for the treatement of diabetes, gastrointestinal disorder, leprosy, blood troubles, bronchitis, cough, cephalic pain, migraine and inflammation 10. The leaves are used as haemostatics and antimicrobial agent 11. Flowers have anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive activity 11.
Bark extracts has effects on oxidative damages in the gastric tissue during alcohol induced ulceration in mice 12. However, relevent experimental work on the antimicrobial activity of the plant has not been explored. Here we report the finding of a study that was designed to test the antibacterial activity of different extracts from Pterospermum acerifolium bark.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Study area: Similipal Biosphere Reserve is located in the district of Mayurbhanj in the northern region of Orissa, between 21°08”- 21°27” N latitude and 86°04”- 86°15” E longitudes, unique habitat of mixed tropical forest (Figure 1). The ecosystem is enriched with more than 500 medicinal plants 13.
FIG. 1- MAP OF SIMILIPAL BIOSPHERE RESERVE
Plant material: Bark of P. acerifolium was collected from Similipal Biosphere Reserve in July 2007 and authenticated by comparison with a voucher specimen in the Post-Graduate Department of Botany, North Orissa University, Baripada, India.
Extraction procedures: P. acerifolium bark powder (250g) was soaked in 1500ml of 60-80% petroleum ether for two weeks and finally placed on a shaker for two hours. This was repeated twice, concentrated and the resulting material (PE) was stored at room temperature for later microbiological assay. The residual plant material was than soaked in 1500 ml 95% ethanol for 10 days (repeated twice). The final ethanol extract was filtered and evaporated to give a gummy material that was further fractionated as in figure 1.
Growth media and preparation of bacteria: Mueller Hinton agar (35g) (Hi-media, India) medium was mixed with one litre of distilled water, enclosed in a screw cap container and autoclaved at 121°C for 15min. The medium was later dispensed into 90mm sterile Petri plates and left to set. The agar plates were incubated for 24 hours at 37°C to confirm their sterility. When no growth occurred after 24 hours, the plates were considered sterile. The bacteria employed in this study consisted three Gram-positive and four Gram-negative bacteria (Table 1). The multiple antibiotic resistance index percentage was determined by using the formula-
% MAR index= No. of antibiotics to which the organism shared resistance X 100
No. of antibiotics used
Determination of antibacterial activity: The antibacterial activity screening was done as described before Panda et al., 14. Briefly, cultures of the bacteria from culture plates were scooped using a wire loop and separately mixed with normal saline and agitated with vortex mixer. A loop full was withdrawn and uniformly distributed on the surface of the agar plate by streaking using a sterile swab. Wells of approximately 6mm in diameter and 2.5mm deep were made on the surface of the solid medium using a sterile borer. The plates were turned upside down and the wells labeled with a marker. The extracts were reconstituted by dissolving 1gm of each in 1ml of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO). Each well was filled with test sample. Sterile DMSO was used as negative control and disk of 10 microgram equivalent Gentamicin and Ciprofloxacin was used as positive control. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24hours. After 24hours the plates were removed and zones of inhibition measured with Himedia antibiotic scale and the results were tabulated. Extracts with zones of inhibition greater or equal to 8mm diameter were regarded as positive. The mean ± SD of the inhibition zone was taken for evaluating the antibacterial activity of the extracts.
Determination of MIC: In the present experiment, extracts which showed positive result were further evaluated for determination of MIC. A broth micro-dilution technique was adopted using 96 well micro-titer plates and tetrazolium salt, 2, 3, 5-Triphenyltetrazolium Chloride (TTC) was carried out to determine the MIC following the methods with few modifications as described by Eloff 15. In the plate, A1 to H1 was the blank and consisted of MH broth only. A3 to H3 was having the stock solution of the test extract(s) and A4 to H4 till A9 to H9 were the wells in which the test extracts were serially diluted using MH broth.
Wells A12 to D12 were control having 20μl of DMSO and E12 to H12 served as control over control. All wells were dispensed with 100μl of MH broth. 20μl of the herbal extract was transferred from stock test solution to the first well i.e. from A4 to H4 containing 100μl of MH broth. 20μl of the MH broth containing herbal extract was then transferred to the next well to create serial dilutions. 100μl of the 0.5 McFarland adjusted activated culture in MH broth was then added to all the wells except the blank. 5μl of 0.5 % TTC was further added to all the dilutions, blank, control and control over control. The final volume of all the wells was 205μl. The microplate was sealed and incubated at 37°C at 130 rpm. 10μl of the broth from each culture tube exhibiting MIC and control tubes were taken aseptically and were plated on one day old MH agar plate as a point inoculum and allowed to dry for 10 min under the laminar air hood. The micro-plate was sealed and incubated at 37°C at 130 rpm and observed for growth of the microorganism.
Determination of MBC and total activity (TA): 10μl of the broth from each well of 96 microtiter plate exhibiting MIC and control wells were taken aseptically and plated on one day old MH agar plate as a point inoculum and allowed to dry for 10 min under the laminar air hood. These plates were then sealed and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours and observed for growth of the bacteria. Absence of the growth of the bacteria showed the MBC result of the respective bacteria.
Total activity is a measure of the amount of material extracted from a plant in relation to the MIC of the extract, fraction or isolated compound. Reasons for screening studies abound to find new lead biologically active compounds and to confirm the ethnomedicinal use of plants to develop phytomedicines for use as herbal medicine. In many screening studies, activities are reported un-quantitatively. In mathematical terms it can be expressed as:
Amount extracted from 1 gram (mg) or amount present in fraction (mg)
Total activity (ml/g) =
MIC (mg/ml)
The units are expressed in mg/g and indicate the degree to which the active extracts, fractions or compounds present in one gram can be diluted and still inhibit the growth of the test organisms 16.
Phytochemical analysis: Qualitative phytochemical analysis was carried out using method described by Trease and Evans 17 and Kokate et al., 18.
Test for alkaloids: Two grams of ground plant material was treated in a test tube with 10 ml of 1% HCl for 30 minutes in a water bath. The suspension was filtered through cotton into a test tube and was divided into two parts. Five drops of each of Dragendorff’s, Wagner's reagent, Mayer’s and Hager’s reagent were added to the respective parts of the solution and the formation of different color indicated the presence of alkaloids.
Tests for carbohydrates: Molisch’s, Fehling’s and Benidict’s tests were done to know the presence of carbohydrate-
Molisch’s test: Aqueous or alcoholic solution of the extracted substance was added to 10% alcoholic solution of a-naphthol. Equal volume of concentrated H2SO4 was added along the side of the tube. A violet ring at the junction of two liquids confirms presence of carbohydrates.
Fehling’s test: 2ml of Fehling’s solution A and 2 ml of Fehling’s solution B was added to 2ml of extracts. After boiling, if bricked precipitation appears, then reducing sugars are present.
Benedict’s test: 5ml of Benedict’s reagent and 3ml of test solution boiled in the water bath. If brick red precipitate appears at the bottom of the test tube then monosaccharides are present.
Test for cardiac glycosides:
Keller-Killiani test: To an extract of the drug in glacial acetic acid, few drops of ferric chloride and conc. H2SO4 were added. If a reddish brown color is formed at the junction of two layer and upper layer turns bluish green, confirms the presence of cardiac glycosides.
Legal Test: To a solution of glycoside in pyridine, sodium nitroprusside solution and sodium hydroxide solution were added. A pink to red colour, confirms presence of cardiac glycosides.
Modified Borntrager's test: 0.1 g of the extract was added with 5ml of dilute HCI and 5ml of 5% solution of ferric chloride and boiled for 5 minutes, cooled and filtered. This filtrate was shaken with benzene. The benzene layer was separated and an equal volume of dilute solution of ammonia was added. Formation of pink color with the ammonical layer signifies presence of anthraquinone glycosides.
Test for proteins and amino acids:
Biuret test: 2ml of extract was mixed with 2 ml of 10% NaOH solution and 2 to 3 drops of 1 % Cupper sulphate solution was added. Appearance of violet or purple color indicates the presence of proteins.
Ninhydrin test: 2 ml of extract was added with 0.5 ml of Ninhydrin solution. The mixture was boiled for 2 minutes, and then the solution was cooled. Appearance of blue color shows the presence of amino acid.
Xanthoproteic test: 2 ml. of extract was added with 1 ml of conc. HNO3, boiled and cooled. Then 40% NaOH was added drop by drop. Appearance of colored solution indicates the presence of proteins.
Test for saponins:
Foam test: 1ml of alcoholic and aqueous extract was diluted separately with distilled water to 10 ml and was shaken in a graduated cylinder for 15 minutes and kept aside. One cm layer of foam after standing for 30 minutes indicates the presence of saponin.
Formation of honeycomb foam: Ground plant material (about 3g) was heated for 5 minutes in a test tube with 30ml of distilled water. The solution was filtered through a filter paper at room temperature. About 10 ml of the filtered solution was shaken in a large test tube; the formation of honeycomb froth that persisted for half an hour indicated the presence of saponin.
Test for tannins and phenolic compounds:
With Ferric chloride: 5% w/v solution of ferric chloride was added in 90% alcohol. Appearance of blue color is the indication of presence of phenols.
With lead acetate: Extracts were mixed with lead acetate. Occurrence of precipitate is the indication of presence of tannins.
With gelatin solution: To a solution of tannins (0.5-1%) aqueous solution of gelatin (1%) and Sodium chloride (10%) are added. Appearance of white buff colored precipitated is the indication of presence of phenols.
Test for steroid and sterols:
Liberman Burchard reagent: To a dry test tube, 2 ml of extract solution was mixed with 2ml of acetic anhydride and 2-3 drops of conc. H2SO4 was added. The solution was mixed thoroughly. An emerald green color development is the indication of presence of steroids or sterols.
Salkowski’s test: 5ml of solution of extract was taken in a dry test tube with chloroform. Equal volume of conc. H2SO4 was added gently along the sides of the test tube. The acid layer develops a yellow color with a green fluorescence and the chloroform layer will give a play of colors first from bluish red to gradually violet red.
Test for flavonoids:
With NaOH: The extract were dissolved in water, and then filtered. The filtrate was treated with sodium hydroxide. Yellow color is observed if flavonoids are present.
With H2SO4: A drop of Conc. H2SO4 acid was added to the above. Yellow color disappears.
With Mg/HCl: The extracts were dissolved in water, and then filtered. The filtrate was treated with Magnesium and a drop of conc. HCl was added. A pink color development is the indication of presence of flavonoids.
Test for gums and mucilage: By adding with 95% alcohol if precipitation results shows the presence of gums and mucilage.
RESULTS: Five different extracts viz. petroleum ether, hexane, butanol, methanol and aqueous (Figure 2) were screened against three Gram-positive and four Gram-negative bacteria (Table 1) during this investigation. Agar cup method was adopted and result presented in Table 2. Butanol extract was found to be the most active extract.
Petroleum ether and hexane extracts showed good zone of inhibition but were less effective than butanol extract. S. aureus was the most sensitive strain with highest zone of inhibition (16.7mm for butanol extract). A more accurate method is MIC test and result was presented in Table 3. The growth inhibition of the test bacteria ranged from 0.312 mg/ml (w/v) to 5.0 mg/ml (w/v).
The lowest MIC value was recorded against S. aureus, P. fluorescence and Salmonella typhimurium at 0.187 mg/ml (w/v). With concentration 1.25 mg/ml, 60% of extracts were proficient to inhibit the growth of different bacterial strains. The results of MBC showed that at concentration of 10.0 mg/ml (w/v), 50% of the test strains were killed.
FIGURE 2-FRACTIONIZATION OF ETHANOL EXTRACTS OF PTEROPSERMUM ACERIFOLIUM BARK
TABLE 1: LIST OF THE BACTERIA USED TO ASSESS THE ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY
Name of the organism | Relevant properties | MAR % | Sources | |
Resistant to | Resistant to | |||
Bacillus subtilis (Gram-positive bacteria) | A, Ak, Ap, Aug, B, Ctn, Ce, Nal | C, Cez, Ch, Olf, Pb,Te, Lvx, E, Gt, G, St, Vn | 40 | MTCC 7164, Chandigarh |
Bacillus lichenoformis (Gram-positive bacteria) | A, Ak, Ap, B, Aug, Ctn, Ce, Nal | C, Cez, Ch, Olf, Pb, Te, Lvx, E, Gt, G, St, Vn | 40 | MTCC 7425, Chandigarh |
Staphylococcus aureus
(Gram-positive bacteria) |
Ak, Ap, B, Aug, Ctn, G, Ce, Nal, Pb | A, C, Cez, Ch, Olf, Te, Lvx, E, Gt, St, Vn | 45 | MTCC 1144, Chandigarh |
Escherichia coli (Gram-negative bacteria) | Ak, Ap, B, Ctn, E, Aug, Ce, Nal | A, C, Ch, Caz, G, Gf, Lvx, Ofl, Pb, St, Te, Vn | 40 | MTCC 1098, Chandigarh |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Gram-negative bacteria) | A, Ak, Ap, B, Ctn, E, Aug, Ce, Nal, Pb | C, Ch, Caz, G, Gf, Lvx, Ofl, St, Te, Vn | 50 | MTCC 1034, Chandigarh |
Pseudomonas florescence (Gram-negative bacteria) | A, Ak, Ap, B, Ctn, E, Aug, Ce, Nal, Pb | C, Ch, Caz, G, Gf, Lvx, Ofl, St, Te, Vn | 50 | MTCC 1748, Chandigarh |
Salmonella typhimurium
(Gram-negative bacteria) |
Ak, Ap, B, Ctn, E, Aug, Ce, Nal, Pb | A, C, Ch, Caz, G, Gf, Lvx, Ofl, St, Te, Vn | 45 | MTCC 3216, Chandigarh |
Amikacin-Ak (30μg); Amoxicillin-Aug (10μg); Amphotericin-Ap (100unit); Ampicillin-A (10μg); Bacitracin-B (10units); Cefoxitin-Ctn (10μg); Ceftriaxone-Cez (10μg); Cephotaxime-Ce (30μg); Chloroamphinecol-Ch (10μg); Ciprofloxacin-C (10μg); Erythromycin-E (15μg); Gatifloxacin-Gf (30μg); Gentamycin-G (10μg); Levofloxacin-Lvx (5μg) ; Naladixic acid-Nal (30μg); Ofloacin-Ofl (5μg); Polymyxin-B-Pb (300 unit); Streptomycin-St (10μg); Tetracycline-Te (10μg) Vancomycin-Vn (30 μg) (Hi media Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India)
TABLE 2 : SCREENING OF ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF PTEROSPERMUM ACERIFOLIUM BARK
Strain no. | Zone of inhibition of different extracts (25 mg/ml) | |||||
PE | H | B | ME | A | Ciprofloxacin | |
1 | 13.0±1.0 | 13.3±2.08 | 10.6±0.57 | 13.6±0.57 | 12.7±2.52 | 16.6±1.52 |
2 | 14.7±0.58 | 13.3±2.08 | 13.0±1.73 | 12.3±1.52 | - | 15.6±0.57 |
3 | 15.3±1.15 | 13.0±1.73 | 16.7±2.08 | 12.7±0.58 | 11.7±1.53 | 29.0±2.0 |
4 | 13.3±1.15 | 13.3±1.15 | 13.3±0.57 | 13.3±1.15 | 11.0±1.73 | 19.6±2.08 |
5 | 10.0±2.0 | - | 12.3±0.58 | 11.7±1.53 | - | 17.1±1.15 |
6 | 14.0±1.0 | 14.0±1.0 | 15.0±1.0 | 11.3±1.58 | 11.7±1.15 | 19.0±2.64 |
7 | 14.7±0.58 | 12.3±1.52 | 13.0±1.73 | 12.3±0.7 | 12.7±0.58 | 24.6±1.53 |
All values are mean zone of inhibition ± SD; (-) No zone of inhibition; Zone of inhibition including 6 mm borer
TABLE 3 : RESULTS OF MIC AND MBC OF ALL EXTRACTS OF PTEROSPERMUM ACERIFOLIUM BARK
Plant extract | Strain no. | Extract concentration in mg/ml | Antibiotic-Ciprofloxacin | |||||
MIC | MBC | MBC/MIC | TA | MIC | MBC | MBC/MIC | ||
PE | 1 | 1.25 | <10.0 | - | 19.6 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 |
2 | 0.625 | 10.0 | 16.0 | 39.2 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 | |
3 | 0.312 | 5.0 | 16.0 | 78.4 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 1.0 | |
4 | 2.50 | 10.0 | 4.0 | 9.8 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 | |
5 | 2.50 | <10.0 | - | 9.8 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 | |
6 | 1.25 | 10.0 | 8.0 | 19.6 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 | |
7 | 1.25 | 10.0 | 8.0 | 19.6 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 | |
H | 1 | 0.625 | 10.0 | 16.0 | 20.3 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 |
2 | 1.25 | 5.0 | 8.0 | 10.1 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 | |
3 | 0.625 | 2.5 | 8.0 | 20.3 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 1.0 | |
4 | 0.625 | 5.0 | 16.0 | 20.3 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 | |
5 | 2.50 | <10.0 | - | 5.1 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 | |
6 | 0.625 | 5.0 | 8.0 | 20.3 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 | |
7 | 0.312 | 5.0 | 16.0 | 40.6 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 | |
B | 1 | 1.25 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 34.7 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 |
2 | 0.625 | 2.5 | 4.0 | 69.4 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 | |
3 | 0.312 | 2.5 | 8.0 | 139.1 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 1.0 | |
4 | 1.25 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 34.7 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 | |
5 | 1.25 | 10.0 | 8.0 | 34.7 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 | |
6 | 0.312 | 5.0 | 16.0 | 139.1 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 | |
7 | 0.625 | 5.0 | 8.0 | 69.4 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 | |
ME | 1 | 2.50 | >10.0 | - | 4.28 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 |
2 | 2.50 | 10.0 | 4.0 | 4.28 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 | |
3 | 2.50 | >10.0 | - | 4.28 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 1.0 | |
4 | 1.25 | 10.0 | 8.0 | 8.56 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 | |
5 | 1.25 | 10.0 | 8.0 | 8.56 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 | |
6 | 1.25 | 10.0 | 8.0 | 8.56 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 | |
7 | 1.25 | 10.0 | 8.0 | 8.56 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 | |
A | 1 | 2.50 | >10.0 | - | 27.3 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 |
2 | 5.0 | >10.0 | - | 13.7 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 | |
3 | 2.50 | 10.0 | 4.0 | 27.3 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 1.0 | |
4 | 2.50 | 10.0 | 4.0 | 27.3 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 | |
5 | 5.0 | >10.0 | - | 13.7 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 | |
6 | 2.50 | 10.0 | 4.0 | 27.3 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 | |
7 | 1.25 | 10.0 | 8.0 | 54.6 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.0 |
Extract concentration in mg/ml
All lowest MICs exhibited by extracts with MBC value four times of MIC, in corresponding microorganisms, highlighting their interesting antimicrobial potency. Phytochemical screening of all extracts of bark is presented in Table 4. All extracts produced positive result for phytochemicals as follows: petroleum ether (flavonoids, saponins, tannin and phenolic compounds, flavonoids, steroids and sterols, oils and fats); hexane (saponins, tannin and phenolic compounds, steroids and sterols, triterpenoids, oils and fat); butanol (alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, tannin and phenolic compounds, steroids and sterols, triterpenoids, oils and fat and glycosides); methanol (alkaloids, saponins, flavonoids, oils and fat); aqueous (alkaloids, steroids and sterols, glycosides and flavonoids).
TABLE 4 : SCREENING OF PHYTOCHEMICALS OF PTEROSPERMUM ACERIFOLIUM BARK
Name of the phytochemicals | Qualitative test | PE | H | B | ME | A |
Alkaloids | Mayer’s reagent | + | - | + | + | + |
Dragendroff’s | + | - | + | + | + | |
Hager’s reagent | + | - | - | - | - | |
Wagner's reagent | - | - | - | - | - | |
Carbohydrates | Molisch’s test | - | - | - | - | - |
Fehling’s test | - | - | - | - | - | |
Benedict’s test | - | - | - | - | - | |
Tannin and phenolic compounds | With Ferric chloride | + | + | + | - | - |
With lead acetate | + | + | - | - | - | |
With gelatin solution | - | - | - | - | - | |
Glycosides | Keller-Killiani test | - | - | + | - | + |
Legal Test | - | - | - | - | - | |
Borntrager's test | - | - | - | - | - | |
Proteins and amino acids | Biuret test | - | - | - | - | - |
Ninhydrin test | - | - | - | - | - | |
Xanthoproteic test | - | - | - | - | - | |
Millon’s test | - | - | - | - | - | |
Gum & mucilages | Molisch’s test | - | - | - | - | - |
Flavonoids | With NaOH | + | - | + | + | - |
With H2SO4 | - | - | - | - | - | |
With Mg/HCl | - | - | - | - | - | |
Saponins | Honeycomb foam | + | + | + | + | - |
Foam test | + | + | + | + | + | |
Steroids and sterol | Salkowski’s test | - | - | - | - | - |
Liberman Burchard | + | + | + | - | + | |
Triterpenoids | Thionlylchloride test | - | + | + | - | - |
Oils and fats | With filter paper | + | + | + | + | - |
With alkaline KOH | - | - | + | + | - | |
Vitamin C | With Indophenol’s | - | - | - | - | - |
Sod. nitroprusside | - | - | - | - | - |
(+) Present; (-) Absent
DISCUSSION: Several techniques have been described and used in searching for new antimicrobials from natural products, i.e. for successfully detecting their active components against human pathogenic bacterial strains. One of these assays is agar diffusion, a method that has been used while screening plant extracts for their antimicrobial effects. All extracts studied showed antibacterial activity. This could justify their use in treatment of microbial infections in man and livestock. Petroleum ether, hexane and butanol extracts showed higher activity compared to methanol and aqueous extracts on test bacteria. This may be as a result of absence of soluble active constituents in methanol and aqueous extract as compared to nonpolar extracts.
The result shows that this plant could be effective and suitable for general use against Gram-negative, Gram-positive and opportunistic pathogens of humans. P. acerifoilum extracts have measurable activity against B. lichenoformis, S. aureus, P. florescence and Salmonella typhimurium. This justifies its use in treatment of UTI in animals as reported by Katende et al., 19. S. aureus was the most susceptible strain to all the test extracts. This could support the use of these plants in treatment of Staphylococcal infections. From Table 2 it is clear that Gram-positives are more susceptable in compare to Gram-negatives.
In general the plant antibiotic substances appear to be more inhibiting to Gram-positive organisms than to the Gram-negatives 20. It is reported that Pencillin and some of the other prominent antibiotic agents of fungal origin are also rather selective in their inhibitory action, most of them being inhibited to Gram-positive bacteria. Unlike Gram-positive bacteria, the lipopolysaccharide layer along with proteins and phospholipids are the major components in the outer surface of Gram-negative bacteria 21. Access of the most compounds to the peptidoglycan layer of the cell wall is hindered by the outer lipopolysaccharide layer. This explains the resistance of Gram-negative bacteria to the lytic action of most extracts exhibiting the activity. It can be assumed that antibacterial extracts from the test plants can be useful in warding of infectious diseases and is therefore a compelling reason to suppose that, as anti-infective agents from test plants are active against human pathogens 22.
However agar diffusion method has some limitations, such as low throughput. A more generally accurate method of assessment is the micro-dilution techniques in 96 well microplates. The bacterial growth and antimicrobial effects can be evaluated by turbidometry measuring optical density of bacterial suspension or by using indicator dyes 15. A variety of dyes have also been used for measuring MIC values for new compounds, and especially with non-aqueous plant extracts. Tetrazolium salts, such as 2, 3, 5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC), can also be used as a dye to indicate bacterial growth.
Tetrazolium salts act as electron acceptors and are reduced by biologically active bacteria from a colorless compound to red in case of TTC 15. The MIC results showed that extracts such as petroleum ether, hexane, butanol, methanol and aqueous were able to prevent the growth of most bacterial strains with selective activities. The rate of growth inhibition of the test bacteria ranged from 0.312mg/ml (w/v) to 5.0mg/ml (w/v). The lowest MICs exhibited by extracts with MBC values four or eight time that of MIC, in corresponding microorganisms, highlighting their interesting antibacterial potency. From these results, it can be observed that, most of the test samples exerted a lethal effect on the test organisms. In addition to these MBC/MIC ratios lower than 4 was obtained with most of the samples, suggesting killing effects 23. Some extracts were found to have broad spectrum activity viz. butanol, petroleum ether, methanol and aqueous where MBC was found 4 time higher value of MIC. Antimicrobial resistance has been reported for most of the principal pathogenic microorganisms like Staphylococcus aureus, Escherchia coli and Salmonella typhimurium 24, 25.The test organisms in the present case showed different MAR index with Salmonella typhimurium and Staphylococcus aureus (45%), Escherchia coli, Bacillus subtilis and B. lichenoformis (40%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa and P. florescence (50%).
The lack of susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the extracts could be attributed to the fact that this bacteria are naturally resistant to many antibiotics due to the permeability barrier afforded by its outermembrane 26. Also its tendency to colonise in a biofilm form makes the cells impervious to therapeutic concentrations of antibiotics. Since its natural habitat is the soil, living in association with bacilli, actinomycetes and molds, it has developed resistance to a variety of their naturally occurring antibiotics 26. For the same reason the plant is not also active against Bacillus subtilis.
The lack of susceptibility of the bacteria to the plant extracts against Eschirichia coli could be attributed to the fact that, unlike conventional pharmaceutical products which are usually prepared from synthetic materials by means of reproducible manufacturing techniques and procedures, herbal medicinal products are prepared from materials of plant origin which may be subjected to contamination and deterioration 27. The storage of extracts may require special condition of humidity or temperature or protection from light. The plant extracts might contain little of the active ingredient. The extracts which were inactive in-vitro may have properties similar to pro-drugs which are administered in an inactive form; their metabolites could be active in-vivo 28.
The present study suggested a wide range of positive reactions for alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, tannin and phenolic compounds, steroids and sterols, triterpenoids, oils and fat and glycosides in this plant. However majority of the extracts give positive results for saponins, steroids and sterols and alkaloids. Evaluation of phytochemicals such as tannin and phenolic compounds, steroid and sterols revealed the presence of most of constituents in nonpolar extracts (petroleum ether, hexane and butanol) compared to polar extracts (methanol and aqueous).
Percentage yield of different extracts were in the order aqueous >butanol >petroleum ether >hexane > methanol. In many screening studies, activities are reported un-quantitatively. Even if extract data are expressed in quantitative terms such as MIC, it is usually not possible to compare different plants or different fractions with the results presented. By calculating total activity result obtained that butanol and aqueous extracts can act as a superior extract compared to other extracts though aqueous extract showed less activity. This study confirms the potential antibacterial activity of butanol extracts of Pterospermum acerifolium bark. This credit to maximum activity of butanolic extract was supposed to butanol being an organic solvent and will dissolve organic compounds better, hence liberate the active component required for antibacterial activity.
CONCLUSION: Further studies are required to isolate the active compounds from aqueous and butanol extract of Pterospermum acerifolium bark, responsible for the antimicrobial affect which might be a lead compound in antibacterial field.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The present research has been funded by the Department of Science and Technology, Government of Orissa (Grant No. 2818/28.06.2006). We are also grateful to the authorities of North Orissa University for providing necessary facilities to carry out this research.
REFERENCES:
- Freeman CD: Antimicrobial resistance; implications for the clinician. Journal of Critical Care Nursing 1997; 20:21-35.
- Thatoi HN, Panda SK and Dutta SK: Phytochemical and antimicrobial evaluation of three medicinal plants from Similipal: A note. Plant Sciience Research 2008; 30:48-51.
- Afolayan AJ: Extracts from the shoots of Arctotis artotoides inhibit the growth of bacteria and fungi. Pharmaceutical Biology 2003; 41:22-25.
- Basile A, Sorbo S, Giordano S, Ricciardi L, Ferrara S, Montesano D, et al: Antibacterial and allelopathic activity of extract from Castanea sativa Fitoterapia 2000; 71:110-116.
- Okpekon T, Yolou S, Gleye C, Roblot F, Loiseau P, Bories C, et al: Antiparasitic activities of medicinal plants used in Ivory Coast. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2004; 90:91-97.
- Kone WM, Kamanzi-Atindehou K, Terreaux C, Hostettmann K, Traore D and Dosso M: Traditional medicine in North Cote-d’Ivoire: screening of 50 medicinal plants for antibacterial activity. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2004; 93:43-49.
- Iwu MM, Duncan AR and Okunji CO: New antimicrobials of plant origin. In: Janick J. (edition), Perspectives on new crops and new uses. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA. 1999:457-462.
- Akerele O: The conservation of medicinal plants. Proceedings of an International Consultation organised by the WHO, IUCN and the WWF. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK, 1988: 266.
- Kritkar KR and Basu BD: Indian medicinal plants. 2nd edition, Bishen Singh and Mahendra Pal Singh publishers, Dehradun, India, 1998:373-376.
- Chatterjee A and Pakrashi SC: The Treaties On Indian medicinal plants, volume-3, National Institute of Science Communication (CSIR), New Delhi, 1997: 16.
- Kirtikar KR and Basu BD: Indian Medical Plants (Lolit Mohan Basu), Allahabad: Vol- VII. 1935:1606.
- Manna AK, Manna S, Behera AK, Kar S: Journal of Pharmacy Research 2009; 2(6): 1042-1044.
- Pandey AK and Rout SD: Medicinal Plants of Similipal Biosphere Reserve. In: Das AP (edition), Perspectives of Plant Biodiversity. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun, 2002: 681-696.
- Panda SK, Thatoi HN and Dutta SK: Antibacterial activity and phytochemical screening of leaves and bark extracts of Vitex negundo Journal of Medicinal Plant Research 2009; 3(4):294-300.
- Eloff JN: A sensitive and quick microplate method to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration of the plant extracts for bacteria. Planta Medica 1998; 64:711-713.
- Eloff JN, Famakin JO and Katerere DRP: Isolation of an antibacterial stilbene from Combretum woodii (Combretaceae) leaves. J. Biotechnol. 2005; 4(10):1167-1171.
- Trease GE and Evans WC: Pharmacognosy, Braillier Tiridel and Macmillan Publishers, 1989.
- Kokate CK, Purohit AP and Gokhale SB: Pharmacognosy. Nirali Prakashan, Pune, 2003:1-624.
- Katende AB, Birnie ANN, Tengnas BO: Useful trees and shrubs for Uganda. Identification propagation and management for agricultural and pastoral communities. Regional Soil Conservation Unit (RSCU). 1995:104 - 613.
- Kumar VP, Chauhan NS, Padhi H. and Rajani M: Search for antibacterial and antifungal agents from selected Indian medicinal plants. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2006; 67: 241-245.
- Burn P: Amphitropic protein. In: A new class of membrane proteins. Trends Biochemical Science 1988; 13: 79-83.
- Nadkarni AK: Nadkarnis Indian Materia Medica, Vol. I and II. Popular prakashan, Bombay: India, 1997.
- Carbonnelle B, Denis F, Marmonier A, Pinon G and Vague, R: Techniques usuelles. Bactériologie médicale. SIMED, South Africa, 1987:232.
- Davis BD, Dulbecco R, Eisen HN, Ginsberg HS, Wood RBJr. and McCarty M: Microbiology, Harper and Row publisher Hagerston, New York, 1973:148.
- Fox KK, Knapp JS, Holmes KK, et al: Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the United States, 1988-1994: the emergence of decreased sus-ceptibility to the fluoroquinolones. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1997; 175: 1396-403.
- Spector RG, Rogers HT, Trounce JR. Textbook of clinical pharmacology. Macmillan India Limited, Bangalore. 1981:678-683.
- WHO: Expert committee on specifications for Pharmaceutical preparations. Quality Assurance of Pharmaceuticals, 32 report. Geneva, World Health Organisation 1992:44 -76.
- Robert B, Beers MH, Robert M, Fletcher AJ: The Merck manual of medical information, Home Ed. Merck Research Laboratories. Division of Merck and Co., Inc. White House Station, USA. 1997:23-66.