ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF ALOE VERA GEL AND HONEY AGAINST BACTERIA ISOLATES FROM WOUND ASPIRATES
HTML Full TextANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF ALOE VERA GEL AND HONEY AGAINST BACTERIA ISOLATES FROM WOUND ASPIRATES
Enwa Felix Oghenemaro * 1, Jemikalajah Johnson 2, Iyamu Mercy Itohan 3, Sada-Okpaka Richard 1 and Oghenejobo Michael 1
Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology 1, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Science Laboratory Technology 2, Faculty of Science, Delta State University, PMB 1, Abraka, Delta State.
Ambrose Alli University 3, Faculty of Natural Science, Department of Microbiology, Ekpoma, Edo State.
ABSTRACT: Wounds may harbour diverse microorganisms, especially bacteria that are resistant to many conventional antibiotics. The aim of this study is therefore to evaluate the antibiotic activities of Aloe vera gel and honey against bacteria isolates from wounds. A cross sectional study of wound aspirates from a health care center was carried out to evaluate the antibacterial activities of Aloe vera and honey against bacteria isolates from wounds following standard microbiological procedures. The antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates to standard antibiotic discs, Aloe vera and honey were done using the agar-diffusion method. The minimum inhibitory concentration of the Aloe vera gel and honey (alone and in combination) were also evaluated using the agar-diffusion method. The bacterial isolated were: Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Proteus vulgaris, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Streptococcus pyogenes. The study showed that honey had a higher antibacterial activity than Aloe vera gel with an inhibition zone diameter (IZD) measuring mm. It also showed that Staphylococcus aureus was the most predominant pathogen found in wounds while Proteus vulgaris and Staphylococcus epidermidis were the least predominant.
Keywords: |
Aloe vera, Honey, Wound, Antibacterial
INTRODUCTION: Wounds are injuries to the body tissues caused by physical trauma or disease processes including surgery, diabetes, burns, punctures, gunshots, laceration, bites, bed sores and broken bone 1. The primary function of normal intact skin is to control microbial populations that live on the surface and to prevent underlying tissues from becoming invaded by potential pathogens. Exposure of subcutaneous tissue, following a loss of skin integrity (i.e. a wound) provides a moist, warm and nutritious environment that is conducive for microbial colonization and proliferation 2.
Wounds are divided into two which are acute and chronic wounds: acute wound are caused by external damage to intact skin and it includes surgical wounds, bites, burns, minor cuts and abrasions and more severe traumatic wounds such as laceration and those caused by crush or gunshot injuries 3. Irrespective of the nature of the cutaneous injury, acute wound are expected to heal within a predictable time frame, although the treatment required to facilitate healing will vary according to the type, site and depth of a wound.
Chronic wounds are caused by endogeneous mechanisms associated with a predisposing condition that ultimately compromises the integrity of dermal and epidermal tissue 3. Appropriate method for healing of the wound is essential for the restoration of the disturbed functional status of the skin 4. A wound leads to the establishment of infections by bacterial pathogens in the internal tissues 5. Wound healing involves a complex series of interactions between different cell types, cytokine mediators and the extracellular matrix. The phases of normal wound healing include hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation and remodeling 6. For some time now, bacteria resistance has been rampant as they have emerged with forms of virulence and new patterns of resistance to antimicrobial agents. Resistance rate to the most common prescribed drugs used vary considerably in different areas World-wide. This emergence of bacterial resistance has led to difficulties in treatment of infections caused by these bacteria.
This research is thus aimed at the antimicrobial activity of both Aloe vera gel and honey in order to evaluate their potentials to meet patient’s needs, pharmaceutical industries and other institutions in the treatment of some wound infections.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Sample Collection: The samples were collected from15 patients with various types of injuries or wounds referred to the diagnostic laboratory in the General Hospital, Abraka. A sterile swab stick was used to collect the sample from the injury with aspirate (Pus). After collection, the swab sticks were taken to the pharmaceutical microbiology laboratory for analyses.
Isolation: A swab containing the sample was inoculated on the agar medium by streaking. This process was done repeated for all the 14 swabs and were incubated at 35 - 37 °C for 24 h. Pure isolates obtained were inoculated in nutrient broth medium and incubated at 35 - 37 °C for 24 h.
Characterization and Identification: This was carried out by methods reported by Monica 7.
Antimicrobial Screening:
Antibiotic sensitivity testing: This was carried out using disc diffusion method. In this test, an aliquot (0.2mL) of the test organism was transferred from nutrient broth medium into sterile petri dish. The antibiotic discs were placed aseptically on the surface of the inoculated plates using sterile forceps.
Determination of Antimicrobial Activity of Aloe vera Gel and Honey against the Isolates: These were carried out using 5 ml each of Aloe vera gel, honey and a combination of Aloe vera gel and honey respectively. Ten fold serial dilution up to 10-10 was made and dilutions used were 50%, 25%, 12.5% and 6.25%. Aseptically prepared disc were impregnated with the dilutions that were dried using hot air oven. The plates were then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The zones of inhibition diameter were measured and recorded.
RESULTS: A Total of Five Bacteria were Isolated from the Wound Swab: Escherichia coli, Proteus vulgaris, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes and Staphylococcus epidermidis.
Aloe vera Gel and Honey Activity:
TABLE 1: INHIBITION ZONE DIAMETERS (mm) PRODUCED BY ALOE VERA GEL AGAINST THE ISOLATED ORGANISMS CONCENTRATION IN mg/ml (ALOE VERA GEL)
S. no. | Isolates | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th |
1 | E | 12 | 14 | 10 | 11 |
2 | E | 9 | 10 | 7 | 8 |
3 | E | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 |
4 | E | 4 | 12 | 10 | 9 |
5 | E | 8 | 4 | 9 | 11 |
6 | E | 5 | 6 | 8 | 12 |
7 | S.A | 4 | 10 | 10 | 9 |
8 | S.A | 2 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
9 | S.A | 12 | 11 | 11 | 10 |
10 | S.A | 10 | 12 | 9 | 11 |
11 | S.A | 11 | 13 | 8 | 13 |
12 | S.A | 7 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
13 | S.A | 9 | 11 | 5 | 14 |
14 | S.A | 6 | 9 | 4 | 6 |
15 | S.A | 8 | 11 | 10 | 7 |
16 | S.A | 7 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
17 | S.A | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
18 | S.A | 11 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
19 | S.A | 6 | 12 | 8 | 9 |
20 | S.P | 0 | 13 | 10 | 11 |
21 | S.P | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 |
22 | S.P | 4 | 8 | 6 | 7 |
23 | S.P | 7 | 9 | 10 | 8 |
24 | S.P | 13 | 15 | 11 | 14 |
25 | S.P | 12 | 14 | 10 | 10 |
26 | S.P | 10 | 16 | 8 | 7 |
27 | S.P | 12 | 15 | 13 | 9 |
28 | S.P | 6 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
29 | S.P | 0 | 9 | 6 | 10 |
30 | S.P | 0 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
31 | S.E | 2 | 6 | 4 | 11 |
32 | S.E | 5 | 5 | 4 | 8 |
33 | P | 4 | 6 | 10 | 5 |
34 | P | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
Keys: E= Escherichia coli S.A= Staphylococcus aureus S.E= Staphylococcus epidermidis S.P= Streptococcus pyogenes
TABLE 2: INHIBITION ZONE DIAMETERS (mm) PRODUCED BY HONEY AGAINST THE ISOLATED ORGANISMS CONCENTRATION IN mg/ml (HONEY)
S. no. | Isolates | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th |
1 | E | 14 | 11 | 12 | 10 |
2 | E | 10 | 8 | 9 | 7 |
3 | E | 9 | 7 | 10 | 8 |
4 | E | 12 | 9 | 4 | 10 |
5 | E | 4 | 11 | 8 | 9 |
6 | E | 6 | 12 | 5 | 8 |
7 | S.A | 10 | 9 | 4 | 10 |
8 | S.A | 5 | 8 | 2 | 2 |
9 | S.A | 11 | 10 | 12 | 11 |
10 | S.A | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 |
11 | S.A | 13 | 13 | 11 | 8 |
12 | S.A | 10 | 10 | 7 | 7 |
13 | S.A | 11 | 14 | 9 | 5 |
14 | S.A | 9 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
15 | S.A | 11 | 7 | 8 | 10 |
16 | S.A | 7 | 9 | 7 | 5 |
17 | S.A | 9 | 11 | 8 | 10 |
18 | S.A | 8 | 10 | 11 | 9 |
19 | S.A | 12 | 9 | 6 | 8 |
20 | S.P | 13 | 11 | 0 | 10 |
21 | S.P | 12 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
22 | S.P | 8 | 7 | 4 | 6 |
23 | S.P | 9 | 8 | 7 | 10 |
24 | S.P | 15 | 14 | 13 | 11 |
25 | S.P | 14 | 10 | 12 | 10 |
26 | S.P | 16 | 7 | 10 | 8 |
27 | S.P | 15 | 9 | 12 | 13 |
28 | S.P | 6 | 8 | 6 | 7 |
29 | S.P | 9 | 10 | 1 | 6 |
30 | S.P | 8 | 10 | 1 | 9 |
31 | S.E | 6 | 11 | 2 | 4 |
32 | S.E | 5 | 8 | 5 | 4 |
33 | P | 6 | 5 | 4 | 10 |
34 | P | 5 | 2 | 1 | 12 |
Keys: E= Escherichia coli S.A= Staphylococcus aureus S.E= Staphylococcus epidermidis S.P= Streptococcus pyogenes P= Proteus vulgaris
TABLE 3: INHIBITION ZONE DIAMETERS (mm) PRODUCED BY MIXTURE OF BOTH ALOE VERA GEL AND HONEY AGAINST THE ISOLATED ORGANISMS CONCENTRATION IN mg/ml (HONEY + ALOE VERA GEL)
S. no. | Isolates | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th |
1 | E | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
2 | E | 11 | 11 | 11 | 10 |
3 | E | 11 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
4 | E | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5 | E | 11 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
6 | E | 12 | 10 | 10 | 0 |
7 | S.A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
8 | S.A | 9 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
9 | S.A | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
10 | S.A | 12 | 10 | 9 | 10 |
11 | S.A | 11 | 10 | 11 | 11 |
12 | S.A | 10 | 11 | 10 | 10 |
13 | S.A | 11 | 10 | 9 | 12 |
14 | S.A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15 | S.A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
16 | S.A | 10 | 9 | 9 | 10 |
17 | S.A | 10 | 10 | 9 | 10 |
18 | S.A | 10 | 12 | 10 | 10 |
19 | S.A | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
20 | S.P | 9 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
21 | S.P | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
22 | S.P | 9 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
23 | S.P | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 |
24 | S.P | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
25 | S.P | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
26 | S.P | 9 | 10 | 12 | 10 |
27 | S.P | 9 | 8 | 10 | 19 |
28 | S.P | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
29 | S.P | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
30 | S.P | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
31 | S.E | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
32 | S.E | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 |
33 | P | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
34 | P | 9 | 9 | 11 | 11 |
Keys: E= Escherichia coli S.A= Staphylococcus aureus S.E= Staphylococcus epidermidis S.P= Streptococcus pyogenes P= Proteus vulgaris
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Wounds are the physical injuries resulting in an opening and breaking of the skin. Appropriate method for healing of the wound is essential for the restoration of the disrupted anatomical continuity and disturbed functional status of the skin 4. A wound leads to the establishment of infections by bacterial pathogens in the internal tissues 5. The study revealed that Staphylococcus aureus was the most predominant organism present in wounds which agrees with the work of Okesola 8.
It was found that honey had more antibacterial activity than Aloe vera gel based on their inhibition zone diameters (IZD). Honey had higher IZD than Aloe vera gel against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Proteus vulgaris. But honey and Aloe vera gel had the same IZD for Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus epidermidis. It also revealed that the mixture of both honey and Aloe vera gel had higher IZDs (e.g. using 10mm3 and above) than that for honey and Aloe vera gel against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus but the same with honey for Proteus vulgaris and lower against Staphylococcus epidermidis and Streptococcus pyogenes.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Nil
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Nil
REFERENCES:
- Jane EP: Encyclopaedia of Nursing & Allied health. 2002 [Cited 2014 Feb 10]: http//www.woundhealsoc.org.
- Robson MC: Wound infection: A failure of wound healing caused by an imbalance of bacteria. Surg. Clin North Am. 1997, 77: 637- 650.
- Davis HR: Aloe vera: A Scientific Approach Vantage Press, New York. 1997 [Cited 2014 Aug 2] http://www.aloevera.co.uk/rhdavis.htm.
- Meenakshi S, Raghavan G, Nath V, Ajay Kumar SR and Shanta M: Antimicrobial wound healing and antioxidant activity of Plagiochasma appendiculatum. J. Ethnopharmacol 2006; 107 (1): 67-72.
- Giacomette A, Cirioni O, Schimizzi AM, Prete DM and Barchiest Errico DM: Epidemiology and Microbiology of Surgical Wound Infection. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2000; 38: 918 - 922.
- Douglas M and Alan IM: Support for Wound Healing. Alternative Medicine Review 2003; 8: 359-360.
- Okesola AO, Kehinde AO: Bacteriology of non- surgical wound infections in Ibadan, Nigeria. African Journal of Medical Sciences 2008; 37: 261-264.
How to cite this article:
Oghenemaro EF, Johnson J, Itohan IM, Richard SO and Michael O: Antimicrobial activity of Aloe vera gel and honey against bacteria isolates from wound aspirates. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2018; 9(11): 4890-93. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(11).4890-93.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
50
4890-4893
382
1653
English
IJPSR
E. F. Oghenemaro *, J. Johnson, I. M. Itohan, S. O. Richard and O. Michael
Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Delta State University, PMB 1, Abraka, Delta State.
felixenwa@yahoo.com
08 March, 2018
11 May, 2018
13 May, 2018
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(11).4890-93
01 November, 2018