ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF INSTANT COFFEE AGAINST SOME MULTI-DRUG RESISTANCE BACTERIA AND PATHOGENIC FUNGI
HTML Full TextANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF INSTANT COFFEE AGAINST SOME MULTI-DRUG RESISTANCE BACTERIA AND PATHOGENIC FUNGI
Manal J. Kiki * and Hayam S. Abdelkader
The University of Jeddah, College of Science, Department of Biology, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
ABSTRACT: This paper presents the antimicrobial activity of instant coffee, a prevalent beverage utilized by millions of people worldwide every day. Several studies have shown that instant coffee contains many useful bioactive compounds, the most important: caffeine, trigonelline, chlorogenic acid, ferulic acid, caffeic acid, nicotinic acid, and phenolic compounds which are responsible for the antimicrobial activity. In this study, six strains of resistant bacteria were selected as follows (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus MRSA, S. aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, and Acinetobacter baumannii). The antibiotic sensitivity test revealed that the most tested bacterial strain was utterly resistant to the selected antibiotic discs. The antimicrobial activity of instant coffee was evaluated at different concentrations (20, 40, 60, and 80 mg/ml) against tested multi-drug resistant bacteria (MDR) and the fungi (A. niger and A. flavus). The results of antibacterial effect of instant coffee showed that the inhibition zone ranged between (7.6±0.5 and 19.6±0.5 mm). While the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ranged between (62.5 and 32.25 mg/ml) against tested bacteria. Moreover, the instant coffee significantly inhibited the mycelial growth of A. flavus and the spore germination of A. niger. Based on the results obtained in this research, several future studies can propose to evaluate the biological activity of coffee, such as the molecular effect of coffee bioactive compounds against human microbiome. In addition to various medical and industrial applications.
Keywords: |
Instant coffee, Antibacterial activity, Antifungal activity, Multidrug-resistant bacteria, MIC
INTRODUCTION: The widespread use of antibiotics against bacterial infections has led to developing resistance bacteria to the most commonly used antibiotics. Because bacteria are becoming more resistant to current antibiotics, new forms of antibiotics need to be created to manage and treat resistant pathogens 1. Concerning treatments, plant metabolites with antimicrobial activity may be of great importance. Tea and coffee were studied previously for this purpose 2.
The two crucial coffee classes are Coffea arabica and Coffea robusta 3. Due to its pleasant taste and aroma add to the stimulating effect, coffee is one of the most popular and widely consumed beverages worldwide 4. Also, coffee is linked to various beneficial health properties, including antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory 5. Moreover, coffee intake can protect against many non-infection diseases 6.
Coffee is a source of a high bioactive molecule, in particular caffeine, polyphenols, mostly chloro-genic acid, caffeic acid, and ferulic acid; these compounds help to total dietary polyphenol intake and are beneficial to consumer health 7, 8. Caffeine is a natural alkaloid present in some plants such as coffee beans, tea leaves and is considered one of the most commonly used therapeutics vehicles in the world 9. Caffeine has several biological effects, including immune-modulatory, antioxidant, anti-cancer, and antimicrobial activity 2. Also, it has a synergistic effect with different antibiotics such as carbenicillin, ceftizoxime, and gentamicin, which are effective against multi-drug resistant bacteria 10. Antimicrobial activity of coffee is variant according to its chemical composition, type, and processing, including roasting and decaffeination 11, 12. Moreover, early studies indicate that anti-microbial activity is restricted to roasted coffee, while it is not present in raw coffee 13. Therefore, roasting coffee products were used to investigate antimicrobial activity.
Caffeine, which is about 2% in robusta coffee, reduce the growth rate of Aspergillus versicolor, Penicillium spp, and at specific concentrations, it can also prevent mycotoxin production, such as aflatoxin produced by A. parasiticus 14, 15. Chlorogenic and caffeic acid, which are non-volatile organic acids found in coffee, has an antibacterial effect against Gram (+) and (-) bacteria. During roasting of coffee, volatile compounds formed, including ketones, aldehyde, and phenolic compounds, which are reported to have antimicrobial activities, and some phenolic compounds have an antibacterial effect 16. On the other hand, roasted coffee has an antibacterial effect against a wide range of Gram (+) and (-) bacteria 3. Moreover, Coffea robusta, which is the mostly instant coffee used, showed better antimicrobial activity than Coffea arabica 4.
Most literature reviews have been performed on the raw and roasted coffee beans. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the antimicrobial effect of instant coffee at the different concentration on the growth of some antibiotic-resistant bacteria (MRSA, S. aureus, E. faecalis, E. coli, K. pneumonia, and A. baumannii), and the pathogenic fungi (A. niger and A. flavus).
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Microorganisms: The bacterial strains (MRSA, S. aureus, E. faecalis, E. coli, K. pneumonia, and A. baumannii), and the fungi (Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus flavus) were obtained from the microbiology laboratory of King Abdul-Aziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Standard methods have been used to identify the morphological and biochemical characterization of all isolates.
Antibiotic Sensitivity Test: Antibiotic efficiency against bacterial strains was tested, and the presence and measurement of inhibition have evaluated their performance 17. The bacterial strain (MRSA, S. aureus, E. faecalis, E. coli, K. pneumonia, and A. baumannii) were tested against the antibiotics: Ciprofloxacin (CIP-5 μg), Ceftriaxone (CTR-30 μg), Meropenem (MRP-10 μg), Ceftazidime (CAZ-30 µg), Imipenem (IPM-10 μg), Ofloxacin (OF-5 μg), Cefoperazone (CFP-75 μg), Meropenem (MEM-10 μg), Gentamicin (GEN-10 μg), Amikacin (AKN-10 μg), Levofloxacin (LEV-5 μg), Piperacillin/Tazobactum (PIT100/10 mcg), Ampicillin/Sulbactam (A/S-10/10 mcg), Amoxicillin /Clavulanic acid, (AMC-30 μg), Ticarcillin/ Clavulanate (TCC-75/10 mcg) and Trimethoprim/ Sulfamethoxazole (SXT-25 µg).
Preparation of Instant Coffee Solutions: The instant coffee powder used in this study was obtained from the local Saudi market, which belongs to one of the most available and popular companies worldwide. Four concentrations (20, 40, 60, and 80 mg/ml) of instant coffee solutions were prepared freshly with distilled water and sterilized in the oven at 160 °C for one hour. Each concentration was kept in a shaking water bath at 50 °C for 15 min 18.
Antibacterial Activity of Instant Coffee Solutions: The bacterial suspensions of (MRSA, S. aureus, E. faecalis, E. coli, K. pneumonia, and A. baumannii) prepared at a concentration of 0.5 McFarland, then were cultured on Mueller-Hinton agar and allowed to dry for 1 h. Agar wells diffusion test was used through punched out the agar plate using sterilized cork borer (6mm), then 50 µL from each concentration of a prepared coffee solution were dissolved in 10% DMSO, and applied into each well 19. DMSO is used as a negative control. The plates were incubated for 24 h at 37°C. After that, the inhibition zones were estimated in (mm).
Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations: The coffee solution, which yielded a positive result in the agar well diffusion test, were used as an antibacterial agent for measurement (MICs) using a micro-broth dilution procedure 19. Bacterial culture of 0.5 McFarland was prepared in Mueller-Hinton broth to obtain (1 × 108 bacterial/ml). 50 μl of bacterial suspension has been applied to each well, except for negative control. 100μlof coffee solution diluted in 10% DMSO was added to each well of the 96-well microtiter plate to obtain eight concentrations (500, 250, 125, 62.5, 31.25, 15.62, 7.6 and 3.9 mg/ml). The micro-titer plates were covered and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. DMSO 10% were used as the negative controls. The coffee-free broth media is used as a positive control. The optical density (OD600) of antibacterial activity was measured using a microtiter plate reader (BioTek Instruments, Inc., USA).The percent of bacterial growth inhibition estimated using the formula:
[(Ac–At)/Ac] ×100
Where (Ac) is an average of three replicates of O.D. values at 600nm of the negative controls, and (At) is an average of three replicates of O.D. absorption values of the test samples. The (MIC) value was known as the lowest concentration that inhibited apparent growth.
Antifungal Activity of Instant Coffee: Fungal strains were grown in potato dextrose agar (PDA) for five days at 26 °C. Then coffee agar plate method was conducted to examine the antifungal activity of instant coffee through mixing PDA medium with different concentrations of instant coffee (20, 40, 60, 80 mg/ml). Coffee agar plate inoculated with sterile (6mm) fungal disk of A. niger and A. flavus, then incubated for sex days at 26 °C. The antifungal effect of instant coffee against tested fungi was done by estimating the amount of fungal growth by observing the formation of mycelium and spore germination at different coffee concentrations during and after incubation. Control fungal plates cultured on PDA agar were included in each experiment under the same conditions as a positive control. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
Statistical Analysis: All experiments were performed three times, and mean ± standard deviation values determined using SPSS statistics. The level of significance for all measurements was determined at P<0.05.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Most of the bacterial strain in the current study were resistant to several antibiotics, whereas the sensitivity profile of tested strains (MRSA, S. aureus, E. faecalis, E. coli, K. pneumonia, and A. baumannii) revealed that K. pneumoniae was sensitive to Imipenem (IPM-10 μg) and Gentamicin/Amikacin, while S. aureus was sensitive to Levofloxacin (LEV-5 μg) and Amikacin (AKN-10 μg). The other bacterial strains showed complete resistance to all types of tested antibiotics Fig. 1. Accordingly, all tested bacterial strains are considered Multi-drug resistant bacteria.
FIG. 1: ANTIBIOTICS SENSITIVITY TEST AGAINST TESTED BACTERIA. (A) MRSA (B) E. COLI (C) A. BAUMANNII (D) E. FAECALIS (E) K. PNEUMONIAE (F) S. AUREUS
The results in Table 1 revealed that instant coffee solution showed a significant antibacterial effect against tested bacterial strains (MRSA, S. aureus, E. faecalis, E. coli, K. pneumonia, and A. baumannii). The inhibition zones ranged between (7.6±0.5 and 19.6±0.5 mm). The maximum inhibition zone was observed against A. baumannii and E. faecalis (19.6±0.5 and 19.0 mm), and the minimum inhibition zone reported was against S. aureus (7.6±0.5). The effectiveness of instant coffee was evaluated by comparing the respective diameters obtained in agar well diffusion assay against tested bacterial isolates.
Instant coffee solutions at the concentrations (40, 60, and 80 mg/ml) gave (13±0.5, 16.6±0.5 mm) an inhibition zone against MRSA. The same concentrations reported (7.0±0.5, 17.3±0.4, and 17.6±0.5 mm) against S. aureus, and (9.6±0.2, 19±0.0 mm) against E. faecales. However, it gave (9.0±0.5, 14.3±0.5, and 15±0.0 mm) against E. coli. The diameter of inhibition zones against K. pneumoniae and A. baumannii were ranged between (17.0±0.0 and 19.6±0.5 mm) at the concentrations (60 and 80 mg/ml), respectively.
Supposition that the inhibition zone's diameter might increase with an increase in the concentration and time of exposure of instant coffee, the bacterial isolates monitored for more than 48 h. However, there was no increase in the diameter of the inhibition zones. Our results agreed with that obtained by Ribeiro et al., 20 who reported that instant coffee has antibacterial activity against against S. aureus and E. coli. Moreover, Almeida et al.,21 found that the inhibition zone of arabica coffee was much smaller than the current study's value, whereas the antibacterial effect of instant coffee in the present study was higher, it could attribute to having a higher percentage of antibacterial compounds in instant coffee than that of Arabica coffee 22. Another study reported by Muslim and Dephinto 23 showed antibacterial activity of Robusta coffee water extract against S. aureus and E. coli. On the other hand, Ullah et al., 24 reported that instant coffee, showed suitable antibacterial activities against P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, and E. coli, with maximum inhibition zone (18mm) against S. aureus, which is very close to our results. Over and above Duangjai et al., 25 demonstrated that coffee pulp extracts had antibacterial activity against both Gram (+) (S. aureus and S. epidermidis) and the Gram (-) bacteria (P. aeruginosa and E. coli).
The results illustrated in Table 2 explain the value of (MIC), which is used to determine the effectiveness of instant coffee accurately. (MIC) values exhibited antibacterial activity ranged between (31.25 and 62.5mg/ml). The instant coffee solution gave (MICs) values of (62.5mg/ml) against E. coli, S. aureus, E. faecalis, and MRSA, while it was (31.25mg/ml) against A. baumannii and K. pneumonia for both of them. Our results were similar to those obtained by Akhlaghi et al., 26 who found that (MIC) of coffee achieved at (62.5mg/ml) against S. mutans.
TABLE 1: INHIBITION ZONE OF INSTANT COFFEE SOLUTION AT DIFFERENT CONCENTRATION AGAINST TESTED BACTERIA
Bacterial strains | Inhibition zone (mm) at different coffee con. (mg/ml) | ||||
(-) control | 20 | 40 | 60 | 80 | |
MRSA | - | - | 13±0.5 | 16.6±0.5 | 16.6±0.5 |
S. aureus | - | - | 7.0±0.5 | 17.3±0.5 | 17.6±0.5 |
E. faecalis | - | - | 9.6±0.2 | 19±0.0 | 19±0.0 |
E. coli | - | - | 9.0±0.5 | 14.3±0.5 | 15±0.0 |
K. pneumonia | - | - | - | 17.6±0.5 | 17±0.0 |
A. baumannii | - | - | - | 17.4±0.0 | 19.6±0.0 |
(-) Control: Negative control (10% DMSO). (–) No antibacterial activity. Data are expressed as Mean ± SD of triplicate experiments.
TABLE 2: (MIC) OF INSTANT COFFEE SOLUTION AGAINST TESTED BACTERIA
Bacterial strains | MIC (mg/ml) |
MRSA | 62.5±0.8 |
S. aureus | 62.0±0.8 |
E. faecalis | 62.5±0.8 |
E.coli | 62.5±0.8 |
K. pneumonia | 31.25±0.4 |
A. baumannii | 31.25±0.4 |
The antifungal activity of instant coffee was studied against A. niger and A. flavus at different concentrations (20, 40, 60, and 80 mg/ml) by monitoring the fungal mycelium growth and the spore germination using coffee agar plate test Table 3. As a result, there is significant growth inhibition of A. flavus Fig. 2B, while it was inhibited only the spore germination of A. niger, compared to the control Fig. 2A. The inhibitory effect of instant coffee was ranged between 60 to 80 mg/ml with the pronounced growth inhibition of A. flavus while it was unclear for A. niger. The spore germination of A. niger inhibited with increasing coffee concentration gradually. In comparison, it has no effect on the spore germination of A. flavus concentrations. Overall, instant coffee had a significantly high inhibitory effect on both A. niger and A. flavus. Similar results were obtained by Nonthakaew et al., 9 who's observed antifungal effect of coffee extract against Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, Penicillum chrysogenum, and Penicillum citrinum.
TABLE 3: EFFECT OF INSTANT COFFEE ON FUNGI BY USING COFFEE AGAR PLATE AT DIFFERENT CONCENTRATION AFTER 6 DAYS AT 26 °C
Coffee
Con. mg/ml |
A. niger | A. flavus | ||
Mycelium | Spores | Mycelium | Spores | |
Control | + + + | + + + | + + + | + + + |
20 | + + + | + + + | + + + | + + + |
40 | + + + | + + | + + | + + |
60 | + + + | + + | + | + |
80 | + + + | + | + | + |
(+): Weak growth, (++): Moderate growth, (+++): Heavy growth. Control: PDA medium without coffee
FIG. 2: ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY OF INSTANT COFFEE AT (20, 40. 60 and 80mg/ml) AGAINST (A) A. NIGER AND (B) A. FLAVUS AFTER 6 DAYS AT 26 °C
To identify the bioactive components that exhibit antimicrobial activity in instant coffee, previous studies reported that caffeine, trigonelline, chlorogenic acid, ferulic acid, caffeic acid, nicotinic acid and phenolic compounds are the primary chemical compounds responsible for the antimicrobial activity 27. Therefore, the antimicrobial activity is not related to a distinct chemical or particular pathway, but many compound and cell target 28. Moreover, Aromatic and phenolic substances demonstrate antibacterial effect by modifying the plasma membrane's composition and function, disrupting active transport, electron transfer, and proton motive force 29. The process responsible for phenolic toxicity to microorganisms can also involve inhibition of the enzyme by oxidized molecules, probably by interactions with sulfidrylic groups or many nonspecific protein interactions 30.
While caffeine is one of the main components in coffee, several derivatives of caffeine, such as xanthin, have also been reported31. Furthermore, different amounts of caffeine compounds have been reported in green and roasted beans for both Arabica and Robusta coffee 32. Therefore, the literature studies have indicated caffeine's antimicrobial activity as the primary compound and its minor composition. It has been observed that caffeine will move through the bacterial cell wall, then, continue inhibiting the DNA synthesis. Lower DNA contributes to reducing development in all bacterial cells. Therefore, enzyme and protein synthesis also decreased 33.
In fungi, caffeine can prevent the germination of spores. Therefore, the lag time is then prolonged and observed. Moreover, Kumar et al., 34 concluded that caffeine was shown to inhibit the growth of two strains of C. albicans, and inhibiting both mycelium development and spore germination of Monacrosporium ambrosium 34. This finding agreed with our results and can explain the inhibitory effect that occurred with tested fungi. Furthermore, caffeine can inhibit aflatoxins production by preventing some critical sugar synthesis such as glucose, fructose, and maltose 35, 36, 37.
CONCLUSION: Our finding proves the antimicrobial activity of instant coffee against the tested multi-drug resistant bacteria (MRSA, S. aureus, E. faecalis, E. coli, K. pneumonia, and A. baumannii), as well as, an antifungal effect against (A. flavus and A. niger). Among the tested bacteria, A. baumannii was the most sensitive to instant coffee according to the inhibition zone (19.6±0.5 mm). Moreover, the sensitivity of different bacteria and fungi can vary depending on coffee concentration. Furthermore, fungi are more sensitive to coffee in comparison to bacteria. The antimicrobial activity in coffee is attributable to many bioactive compounds such as caffeine, trigonelline, chlorogenic acid, ferulic acid, caffeic acid, nicotinic acid, and phenolic compounds. Consequently, instant coffee can be used as a potential alternative antimicrobial substance due to its antimicrobial properties. It will be interesting to study the bioactivity and action mode of different coffee types and components for crucial medical and industrial application, concerning its antimicrobial, antioxidant, anticancer, and immune-modulatory activity.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: None
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: The authors of this manuscript declared that they have no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES:
- Gaul J and Donegan K: Caffeine and its effect on bacteria growth. Journal of Biological Sciences 2015; 1(8): 4-8.
- Lele OH, Manier JA, Chakravorty RL, Vaidya SP and Chowdhary AS: Assessment of biological activities of caffeine. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2016; 5(5): 45-53.
- DePaula J and Farah A: Caffeine Consumption through Coffee: Content in the Beverage, Metabolism, Health Benefits and Risks. Beverages 2019; 5(2): 37.
- Acidri R, Sawai Y, Sugimoto Y, Handa T, Sasagawa D, Masunaga T, Yamamoto S and Nishihara E: Phyto-chemical profile and antioxidant capacity of Coffee Plant organs compared to green and roasted Coffee Beans. Antioxidants 2020; 9(2): 93.
- Saeed M, Naveed M, BiBi J, Ali Kamboh A, Phil L and Chao S: Potential nutraceutical and food additive properties and risks of Coffee: a comprehensive overview. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 2019; 59(20): 3293-3319.
- Lee M, McGeer EG and McGeer PL: Quercetin, not caffeine, is a major neuroprotective component in Coffee. Neurobiology of Aging 2016; 46: 113-23.
- Benigno ME, Fong LE, Biju D, Muharram A, Davis IM, Vela KO, Rios D, Osorio-Camacena E, Kaur B, Rojas S and Forester SC: The impact of the roast levels of Coffee extracts on their potential anticancer activities. Journal of Food Science 2018; 83(4): 1125-30.
- Król K, Gantner M, Tatarak A, and Hallmann E: The content of polyphenols in Coffee beans as roasting, origin and storage effect. European Food Research and Technology 2020; 246: 33-39.
- Nonthakaew A, Matan N, Aewsiri T and Matan N: Antifungal activity of crude extracts of coffee and spent coffee ground on areca palm leaf sheath (Areca catechu) Based Food Packaging. Packaging Technology and Science 2015; 28(7): 633-45.
- Bazzaz BSF, Fakori M, Khameneh B, Hosseinzadeh H: Effects of Omeprazole and Caffeine alone and in combination with gentamicin and ciprofloxacin against antibiotic resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli J of Pharmacopuncture 2019; 22(1): 49-54.
- Tsou SH, Hu SW, Yang JJ, Yan M and Lin YY: Potential oral health care agent from coffee against virulence factor of periodontitis. Nutrients 2019; 11(9): 2235.
- Mehta VV, Rajesh G, Rao A, Shenoy R, and BH MP: Antimicrobial efficacy of Punica granatum mesocarp, Nelumbo nucifera leaf, Psidium guajava leaf and Coffea canephora extract on common oral pathogens: An in-vitro Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2014; 8(7): ZC65-ZC68.
- Muller U, Sauer T, Weigel I, Pichner R and Pischetsrieder M: Identification of H2O2 as a major antimicrobial component in coffee. Food and Function 2011; 2: 265-72.
- Sugiyama A, Sano CM, Yazaki K, Sano H: Caffeine fostering of mycoparasitic fungi against phytopathogens. Plant Signaling and Behavior 2016; 11(1): e1113362.
- Khameneh B, Iranshahy M, Soheili V and Bazzaz BSF: Review on plant antimicrobials: a mechanistic viewpoint. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control 2019; 8: 118.
- Adamczak A, Zarowski M and Karpinski MT: Antibacterial activity of some flavonoids and organic acids widely distributed in plants. Journal of Clinical Medical 2020; 9: 109.
- Coorevits L, Boelens J and Claeys G: Direct susceptibility testing by disk diffusion on clinical samples: a rapid and accurate tool for antibiotic stewardship. European Journal of Clinical Microbial Infectious Disease 2015; 34:1207-1212.
- Abdul Rahman NA, Muharram S.H, and Abiola O: Antibacterial activity of NESCAFE instant coffee beverages and pharyngitis causing Streptococcus species. Brunei Darussalam Journal of Health. 2014; 5: 70-79.
- Balouiri M, Sadiki Mand Ibnsouda S: Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis 2016; 6: 71-79.
- Ribeiro M, Dorta C, Tanaka A, Shigematsu E, Giannoni J and Pardo R: The Influence of instant coffee on the survival rate of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacteriumbifidum, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research 2017; 7: 178-192.
- Almeida AA, Naghetini CC, Santos VR, Antonio AG, Farah A and Glória MB: Influence of natural Coffee compounds, Coffee extracts and increased levels of caffeine on the inhibition of Streptococcus mutans. Food Research International 2012; 49: 459-61.
- Tasew T, Mekonnen Y, Gelana T, Redi-Abshiro M, Chandravanshi BS, Ele E, Mohammed AM and Mamo H: In-vitro antibacterial and antioxidant activities of roasted and green Coffee beans originating from different regions of Ethiopia. International Journal of Food Science 2020; Article ID 8490492; 1-8.
- Muslim Z and Dephinto Y: Antibacterial activity of Robusta Coffee (Coffea canephora) leaves to Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research 2019; 12: 113-115.
- Ullah R, Ahmad S, Atiq A, Hussain H, Rehman R, Abdel Salam N and Adnan M: Qualification and antibacterial activity of flavonoids in coffee samples. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2015; 12(4): 84-86.
- Duangjai A, Suphrom N, Wungrath J, Ontawong A, Nuengchamnong N and Yosboonruang A: Comparison of antioxidant, antimicrobial activities and chemical profiles of three Coffee (Coffea arabica) pulp aqueous extracts. Integrative Medicine Research 2016; 5(4): 324-31.
- Akhlaghi N, Sadeghi M, Fazeli F, Akhlaghi S, Mehnati M and Sadeghi M: The antibacterial effects of coffee extract, chlorhexidine, and fluoride against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus plantarum: An in-vitro Dental Research Journal 2019; 16(5): 346-53.
- Godavarthy D, Naikk R, Gali PK, Mujib BR and Badam VR: Can coffee combat caries? An in-vitro Journal of Oral and Maxillofac Pathology 2020; 24(1): 64-67.
- Burt, S: Essential oils: Their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods: A review. Int. J. Food Microbiol2004; 94: 223-53.
- Takó M, Kerekes EB, Zambrano C, Kotogán A, Papp T, Krisch J and Vágvölgyi C: Plant phenolics and phenolic-enriched extracts as antimicrobial agents against food-contaminating microorganisms. Antioxidants 2020; 9(2): 165.
- Tsuchiya H: Membrane Interactions of Phytochemicals as Their Molecular Mechanism Applicable to the Discovery of Drug Leads from Plants. Molecules 2015; 20(10): 18923-966.
- Sun HW, Qiao FX and Liu GY: Characteristic of theophylline imprinted monolithic column and its application for determination of xanthine derivatives caffeine and theophylline in green tea. Journal of Chromatography 2006; 1134(1-2): 194-200.
- Aqel A, Almulla A, Al-Rifai A, Wabaidur SM, AL-Othman ZA and Ahmed YB: Rapid and sensitive determination of methylxanthines in commercial brands of tea using Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromato-graphy-Mass Spectrometry. International Journal of Analytical Chemistry 2019; 1-9.
- Panda S: Study of antibacterial effect and analgesic effect from extraction of caffeine from Cofea arabica and taste masking by inclusion of betacyclodextrane. European Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2018; 5(5): 825-28.
- Kumar NS, Hewavitharanage P and Adikaram NKB: Attack on tea by Xyleborus fornicatus: Inhibition of the symbiote, Monacrosporium ambrosium, by caffeine. Phytochemistry 1995; 40(4): 1113-16.
- Kwaśniewska-Sip P, Cofta G, and Nowak PB: Resistance of fungal growth on Scots pine treated with caffeine. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 2018; 132: 178-84.
- Aneja M and Gianfagna T: Induction and accumulation of caffeine in young, actively growing leaves of cocoa (Theobroma cacao) by wounding or infection with Crinipellis perniciosa. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 2001; 59: 13-16.
- Holmes RA, Boston RS and Payne GA: Diverse inhibitors of aflatoxin biosynthesis. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2008; 78: 559-72.
How to cite this article:
Kiki MJ and Abdelkader HS: Antimicrobial activity of instant coffee against some multi-drug resistance bacteria and pathogenic fungi. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2021; 12(8): 4444-50. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.12(8).4444-50.
All © 2013 are reserved by the International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
45
4444-4450
657
618
English
IJPSR
M. J. Kiki * and H. S. Abdelkader
The University of Jeddah, College of Science, Department of Biology, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
mjkiki@uj.edu.sa
29 June 2020
17 January 2021
19 May 2021
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.12(8).4444-50
01 August 2021