ANTIVIRAL POTENTIAL OF DESMODIUM GANGETICUM (L.) DC. EXTRACT: DEVELOPMENT OF ANTIVIRAL PHYTOMEDICINE (GANJHUVIRR) FOR THE TREATMENT OF DENGUE FEVER ASSOCIATED WITH THROMBOCYTOPENIA
HTML Full TextANTIVIRAL POTENTIAL OF DESMODIUM GANGETICUM (L.) DC. EXTRACT: DEVELOPMENT OF ANTIVIRAL PHYTOMEDICINE (GANJHUVIRR) FOR THE TREATMENT OF DENGUE FEVER ASSOCIATED WITH THROMBOCYTOPENIA
Rajesh Kumar Ganjhu
Radhika Ayurveda Research and Development, R. Ho. No 3, S. No 1/1/1, Laxminagar, Pimple Gurav, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
ABSTRACT: Natural products can be the alternative of synthetic medicine and antiviral drugs can be potential from natural products. An attempt was made to evaluate the antiviral activity from the extract of Desmodium gangeticum (L.) DC. as a phytomedicine (GanjhuVirR) for the treatment of dengue fever associated with thrombocytopenia. The present study was evaluated acute and subacute toxicity in rat as well as clinical trial in treated and without treated patients who admitted in hospital due to dengue fever associated with thrombocytopenia. The rats were grouped into group 1 (control) and 2, 3 and 4 (treated) for toxicity test while 51 patients were included in the clinical trial and 25 were treated and 26 provided only standard management as control. The parameters viz. platelet count, fever profile, average hospitalization period, clinical profiles and viral load reduction were tested for both the group. All the data related to morbidity, mortality and behavioural features were observed similar between exposed and control group. The haematological and biochemicals findings were comparable between the group. The platelet counts were significantly (P<0.001) increased and body temperature and hospital stay were significantly (P<0.001) decreased in the treated group than control group. Moreover, GanjhuVirR is a phytomedicine extracted from studied plant and capable to treat viral activity especially for Dengue virus. This is non-toxic as per animal study and is safe without any adverse events and normalize the clinical findings among patients. Future research is suggested to know the efficacy of mild to moderate Covid-19 Patients.
Keywords: Natural products, Desmodium gangeticum, Ganjhu Vir R, Antiviral activity, Dengue therapy
INTRODUCTION: In recent research, the status of phytomedicine and their therapeutic actions has found high opportunity and has attracted great interest worldwide 1, 2. As per traditional knowledge, the people of several countries depend on herbal medicines for the therapy of many health disorders 2, 3.
During SARS-COV-2 scenario, researchers have been shown interest to develop herbal formulations for the improvement of the immune system to prevent viral infections in people 2, 4, 5. On the other hand, different forms of preparation from Carica papaya leaves extract have long been used traditionally for treating dengue fever 6.
Among several viruses, these two have most prevalent in India and other parts of the globe. Till now, the treatment of the viral activities by using synthetic drugs is inconclusive. Besides several medicinal plants, Desmodium gangeticum (L.) DC. commonly called Shalparni belongs to the family Leguminosae (Fabaceae), subfamily Papilli-onaceae. Trout 7 reported that genus Desmodium contains 170 tropical and subtropical species and this is distributed throughout the warmer parts of India. According to Toyigbénan et al. 8, several species under this genus have been used as traditional medicines.
The potent phytochemicals such as of isoflavones, isoflavanones, C-glycosyl flavonoids, pterocarpans, coumaronochromones, kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside, methyl salicylate β-D-glucopyranoside, leonuriside A, syringaresinol - 4' – O – β - D-glucopyranoside, (17Z, 20Z) - hexacosa-17, 20-dien-9-one and gangenoid have investigated in national and international studies 9, 10, 11.
For a drug discovery process, toxicity test in animals to know the safety profile of drug candidate followed by a clinical trial in human is a necessary step 12, 13, 14. Moreover, only leaf extract of C. papaya enhanced platelet counts during dengue fever as per clinical trial 15, but antiviral potential of GanjhuVirR developed from Desmodium gangeticum (L.) DC. extract especially for the prevention of Dengue fever associated with thrombocytopenia is lacking. The present study was attempted to evaluate the safety profile especially oral toxicity test in rat and clinical trial in human by using GanjhuVirR developed from Desmodium gangeticum (L.) DC. extract especially for the treatment of Dengue fever associated with thrombocytopenia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Plant Collection and Processing: The medicinal plant Desmodium gangeticum (L.) DC. was collected from the Khunti District of Jharkhand, India, during the period of 2019. The plant was identified by Botanical survey of India (Central National Herbarium), Howrah, West Bengal, India (voucher number – CNH/Tech IV/Repository/2015/17).
Freshly collected plant material was cleaned to remove adhering dust and then dried under shade. The dried samples were powdered and stored at room temperature (25°C) for further studies. Prior to test of acute and sub-acute toxicity as well as Dengue clinical trial, the powder was extracted with saline and further sufficient quantities of excipients were added to obtain GanjhuVirR Syrup, which was further utilized for safety and clinical trial study.
Oral acute and Subacute Toxicity Test in Rat:
Acclimatization and Feeding of Rat: For both the test, the acclimatization was performed for Albino Wister rat (age = 4-6 weeks and body weight 60-90 gm) in the designated animal house. The temperature was maintained 22oC (+3oC), the relative humidity had been at least 30% and preferably not exceeded 70% and the lighting was maintained artificially in which photoperiod was 12 h light and 12 h dark.
For feeding conventional laboratory diets was used with continuous supply of drinking water. All the animals were caged as per the dosing group such as Group 1 (Vehicle control), Group 2 (Therapeutic dose as TD = 1.8 ml/Kg), Group 3 (Average dose as TD x 5 = 9 ml/Kg) and group 4 (Highest dose as TD x 10 = 18 ml/Kg), respectively.
Administration of Doses for Acute Toxicity Test in Rat: The test compound (GanjhuVirR) was administered in a single dose by gavage using oral feeding needle. All animals were fasted prior to dosing. Following the period of fasting, all the animals weighted and then test compound administered and their food was withheld for further 3-4hrs in test animals. In each group, 10 animals (5 males and 5 females) were kept for experiments. Mortality was observed for 24 h and 48hrs duration and different clinical signs such as convulsions, lethargy, sleep, coma, salivation, diarrhoea, skin colour, fur, eyes and mucus membrane were monitored, and data were recorded for death of animals
Administration of Doses for Subacute Toxicity Test in Rat: The test compound (GanjhuVirR) was administered in a single dose as mentioned earlier by gavage using oral feeding needle. In each group, 12 animals (6 males and 6 females) were kept for experiments. The duration of experiments was followed 15 days (TC = test compound experiment), 50% of 15th day (Imm. Exp. = Immediate as 48 h after last exposure – instant effect) and 50% of 30th day (Post. Exp. = Post exposure as 15 days after last exposure – reversibility of toxicity, if any).
Study of Haematological and Biochemical Features of Rat: During subacute toxicity test, different haematological such as Hb, RBC, WBC, platelet count, differential count and biochemical blood glucose, total protein, serum creatinine, SGOT and SGPT were estimated as per standard protocol for all groups twice at 15th day and 30th day of exposure.
Clinical Trial for Dengue Fever and Thrombocytopenia in Patients: A total 54 patients who suffered from Dengue fever associated with thrombocytopenia were recruited in the present study. Among 54 patients, 3 patients were rejected because they did not fulfil inclusion criteria.
Finally, 51 patients were included in the study and 25 were treated with GanjhuVirR and standard management while 26 provided only standard management without GanjhuVirR as control.
The parameters viz. platelet count, fever profile, average hospitalization period, clinical profiles, viral load and viremia clearance were tested both the group.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Evaluation of Oral Acute and Subacute Toxicity in Rat: Table 1 describes oral acute toxicity study in rats for different groups for four different durations.
All the data related to morbidity, mortality and behavioural features were observed similar when exposed to GanghuVirR compared to control group. Table 2 describes oral subacute toxicity study in rats for different groups for four different durations.
All the data related to morbidity, mortality and behavioural features were observed similar when exposed to GanjhuVirR compared to control group. Table 3 evaluates haematological and biochemical parameters in rats for different groups for two durations. All the average data were comparable between GanjhuVirR treated groups untreated (control) group.
TABLE 1: ORAL ACUTE TOXICITY STUDYIN RATS EXPOSED TO GANGHUVI RR FOR DIFFERENT GROUPS
Parameters | 30 min | 4 h | 24 h | 48 h |
Skin and Fur | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal |
Eyes | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal |
Mucous membrane | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal |
Salivation | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal |
Lethargy | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
Sleep | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal |
Coma | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
Convulsions | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
Tremors | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
Diarrhoea | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
Morbidity | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal |
Mortality | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
TABLE 2: ORAL SUBACUTE TOXICITY STUDY IN RATS EXPOSED TO GANJHUVIR R FOR DIFFERENT GROUPS
Parameters | 1st week | 2nd week | 3rd week | 4th week |
Skin and Fur | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal |
Eyes | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal |
Mucous membrane | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal |
Salivation | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal |
Lethargy | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
Sleep | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal |
Coma | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
Convulsions | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
Tremors | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
Diarrhoea | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
Morbidity | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal |
Mortality | Nil | Nil | Nil | Nil |
TABLE 3: HAEMATOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL STUDY FOR ALL GROUPSOF RATS EXPOSED TO GANJHUVIRR (MEAN ± SD; N = 12)
Parameters | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | ||||
15th day | 30th day | 15th day | 30th day | 15th day | 30th day | 15th day | 30th day | |
Haemoglobin (11.5-16.1 gm/dl) | 12.30 | 11.65 | 13.25 | 12.37 | 11.89 | 13.21 | 13.78 | 13.21 |
WBC (6.6-12.6x103/mm3) | 7.65 | 6.78 | 10.34 | 9.32 | 8.42 | 7.91 | 8.73 | 7.89 |
RBC (6.76-9.75x103/mm3) | 6.98 | 7.21 | 8.43 | 7.31 | 7.41 | 8.72 | 7.64 | 8.76 |
Neutrophils (1.77-3.38/mm3) | 2.45 | 2.17 | 2.81 | 2.38 | 2.57 | 1.98 | 2.46 | 2.76 |
Lymphocytes (4.78-9.12x103/mm3) | 6.52 | 5.64 | 5.38 | 6.43 | 8.62 | 7.64 | 5.67 | 6.45 |
Eosinophils (0.03-0.08x103/mm3) | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
Monocytes (0.01-0.04x103/mm3) | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.02 |
Basophils (0.00-0.03x103/mm3) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Platelets (150460 x 103/mL) | 325 | 316 | 328 | 412 | 298 | 312 | 369 | 417 |
Blood glucose (50-130 mg/dl) | 121 | 115 | 109 | 114 | 118 | 125 | 109 | 113 |
Total protein (5.6-7.6 gm/dl) | 6.54 | 7.12 | 5.69 | 6.53 | 6.43 | 7.26 | 5.78 | 6.15 |
Serum creatinine (0.2-0.8 mg/dl) | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
SGOT (>32 I U/L) | 14.31 | 16.54 | 24.73 | 28.43 | 26.45 | 26.53 | 24.76 | 25.68 |
SGPT (>32 I U/L) | 21.34 | 19.47 | 27.54 | 31.23 | 27.32 | 29.78 | 34.86 | 31.78 |
Clinical Trial Among Patients: Fig. 1 represents the comparative analysis of platelet count (thousands) in GanjhuVirR treated group compared to control group.
On the baseline, an increased value found in the treated group (71.90 ±17.70) in comparison with control group (61.06 ± 20.03) while in day 1, day 3 and day 5 significantly (P<0.001) increased in treated group (78.00 ± 13.18, 128.19 ± 11.32 and 159.19 ± 18.22) when compared to untreated (control) group (60.88 ±18.19, 88.08 ± 20.22 and 102.10 ± 13.19).
FIG. 1: MEAN PLATELET COUNT (IN THOUSANDS) OF GANJHUVIRR TREATED VERSUS WITHOUT TREATED PATIENTS
Fig. 2 exhibits the comparative analysis of body temperature (oF) in GanjhuVirR treated group compared to control group. On the baseline, the mean value of body temperature found in the treated group (101.54) in comparison with control group (101.6) while in day 1 the data was comparable (101.2 and 101.03) but day 3 and day 5 significantly (P<0.001) decreased (99.84 and 98.52) in treated group when compared to untreated (control) group (100.65 and 100.14).
FIG. 2: MEAN BODY TEMPERATURE (IN OF) OF GANJHUVIRR TREATED VERSUS WITHOUT TREATED PATIENTS
Fig. 3 depicts the comparative analysis of number of days of hospitalization (days) in GanjhuVirR treated group compared to control group. The mean hospitalization period was significantly (P<0.01) reduced in treated group (3.65 ± 0.97) when compared to control group (6.20 ± 0.98).
FIG. 3: MEAN DURATION OF HOSPITALIZATION (IN DAYS) OF GANJHUVIRR TREATED VERSUS WITHOUT TREATED PATIENTS
Fig. 3 evaluates the comparative analysis of mean viral load reduction (VLR) in GanjhuVirR treated group compared to control group. The mean VLR was increased in treated group (-1.72 ± 1.07) when compared to control group (-1.48 ± 0.42).
FIG. 4: MEAN VIRAL LOAD REDUCTION (IN DAYS) OF GANJHUVIRR TREATED VERSUS WITHOUT TREATED PATIENTS
Several phytochemicals have capacity to prevent various diseases. Among several medicinal plants, Desmodium gangeticum (L.) DC. is well known medicinal plant to prevent major health disorders 16, 17. According to Rastogi et al. 16, this plant has potential antiviral activity when used the extract. Interesting research by Lelešius et al. 18 indicated the extract of Desmodium canadense prevent avian infectious bronchitis viral activity. From earlier study by Ganjhu et al. 19 explained the potential of this plant as an antibacterial and antiviral activities, but they mentioned that further research is required to know that mechanism of combating microbial and viral infections.
In the present study, it was established that the GanjhuVirR extracted from Desmodium gangeticum is a suitable non-toxic antiviral drug potential for the therapeutic agent to cure dengue fever along with thrombocytopenia among patients. This is a first-time endeavour to develop GanjhuVirR Patented (Patent no. 302868) as an antiviral phytomedicine.
CONCLUSION: It is concluded that GanjhuVirR is a phytomedicine extracted from Desmodium gangeticum (L.) DC. and capable to treat viral activity especially for Dengue virus. Moreover, this phytomedicine observed non-toxic when tested in rat at acute and subacute oral exposure without mortality and morbidity as well as normal behavioural features. The clinical trial revealed that this phytomedicine is safe without any adverse events among patients. Also, this increased the platelet counts and decreased body temperature, hospital stay and viral load among treated patients in comparison with untreated (control) patients. It is suggested in future research to know the efficacy of antiviral activity of Mild to Moderate Covid-19 Patients.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: With the capacity of the Inventor and the corresponding author I would like to acknowledge Ayushraj Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur, Imprex Health Care, Pune, Dr. Sharad Dhawade, Lokmanya Medical Research Centre-Lokmanya Hospital Chinchawad - Pune, Institute of Biomedical & Industrial Research - Jaipur and my Mother Radhika Devi.
Ethical Approval and Ctri Reg No: Ref No. LMRC/EC/18-19/043, CTRI /2019/01/017096 & IAEC Approval No. IBIR/IAEC2016/IV/09.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: Authors declare none.
REFERENCES:
- Suntar I: Importance of ethnopharmacological studies in drug discovery: role of medicinal plants. Phytochem Rev 2019; 19: 1199-1209.
- Mohan PK, Adarsh Krishna TP, Senthil Kumar T and Ranjitha Kumari BD: Pharmaco-chemical profiling of Desmodium gangeticum(L.) DC. with special reference to soil chemistry. Futur J Pharm Sci 2021; 7: 210.
- Martins E: The growing use of herbal medicines: issues relating to adverse reactions and challenges in monitoring safety. Front Pharm 2013; 4: 177.
- Lim XY, The BP and Tan TYC: Medicinal plants in COVID-19: potential and limitations. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12: 355.
- Ahmad S, Zahiruddin S, Parveen B, Basist P, Parveen A, Gaurav PR and Ahmad M: Indian medicinal plants and formulations and their potential against COVID-19-preclinical and clinical research. Front Pharmacol 2021; 11: 2470.
- Sarker MMR, Khan F and Mohamed IN: Dengue fever: Therapeutic potential of Caricaapaya leaves. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:610912.
- Trout K: Trout’s notes on the genus Desmodium. Better Days Publishing 1997: 1-38.
- Toyigbénan BF, Raphiou M, Marcellin A, Durand DN, Aklesso N, Sylvestre A, Haziz S, Adolphe A, Aly S and Lamine BM: Ethnobotanical Survey of three species of Desmodium genus (Desmodium ramosissimum, Desmodium gangeticumand Desmodium adscendens) used in traditional medicine, Benin. Int J Sci 2018; 7: 26-9.
- Subha R, Madan MP and Ajay KSR: An ethnomedicinal, phytochemical and pharmacological profile of Desmodium gangeticum(L.) DC. and Desmodium adscendens (Sw.) DC. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2011; 136:283-96.
- Xueqin M, Chengjian Z, Changling H, Khalid R and Luping Q: The genus Desmodium (Fabaceae)-traditional uses in Chinese medicine, phytochemistry and pharmacology. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2011; 138: 314-32.
- Prasobh KM, Anil KM, Senthil TK and Kumari BDR: A comprehensive review of the phytochemical and pharmacological properties of Desmodium gangeticum(L.) DC. J Adv Sci Res 2020; 11(4): 90-7.
- Dorato MA and Buckley LA: Toxicology testing in drug discovery and development. Current Protocols in Toxicology 2007; 19.
- Parasuraman S: Toxicological screening. Journal of pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics 2011; 2(2): 74-9.
- Akhondzadeh S: The importance of clinical trials in drug development. Avicenna J of Medical Biotechnology 2016; 8(4): 151.
- Kasture PN, Nagabhushan KH and Kumar A: A multi-centric, double blind, placebo-controlled, randomized prospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Carica papaya leaf extract, as empirical therapy for thrombocytopenia associated with dengue fever. Journal of the Association of Physicians of India 2016; 64(6): 15-20.
- Rastogi S, Pandey MM and Rawat AK: An ethnomedicinal, phytochemical and pharmacological profile of Desmodiumg angeticum (L.) DC. and Desmodium adscendens (Sw.) DC. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 2011; 136(2): 283-96.
- Sebua SS and Alfred M: Data on medicinal plants used to treat respiratory infections and related symptoms in South Africa. J Data Bri 2018; 21: 419-23.
- Lelešius R, Karpovaitė A, Mickienė R, Drevinskas T, Tiso N, Ragažinskienė O, Kubilienė L, Maruška A andŠalomskas A: In vitro antiviral activity of fifteen plant extracts against avian infectious bronchitis virus. BMC Vet Res 2019; 15(1): 178.
- Ganjhu RK, Mudgal PP and Arunkumar G: Pharmacological and phytoconstituent profile of Desmodium Gangeticum-An update. International Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemical Research 2014; 6(3): 643-57.
How to cite this article:
Ganjhu RK: Antiviral potential of Desmodium gangeticum (L.) Dc. extract: development of antiviral phytomedicine (Ganjhuvirr) for the treatment of dengue fever associated with thrombocytopenia. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2022; 13(9): 3762-67. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.13(9). 3762-67.
All © 2022 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
42
3762-3767
784 KB
339
English
IJPSR
Rajesh Kumar Ganjhu
Radhika Ayurveda Research and Development, R. Ho. No 3, S. No 1/1/1, Laxminagar, Pimple Gurav, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
rajeshganjhu@gmail.com
11 February 2022
12 March 2022
27 April 2022
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.13(9).3762-67
01 September 2022