ASSESMENT OF PHYTOCHEMICALS AND ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY OF MURRAYA KOENIGII LINN.
HTML Full TextASSESMENT OF PHYTOCHEMICALS AND ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY OF MURRAYA KOENIGII LINN.
Pratima Vijayvargia* and Rekha Vijayvergia
Plant Pathology and Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, India.
ABSTRACT: Objective: To analyze phytochemicals both qualitatively and quantitatively and to estimate in vitro antioxidant activity, total phenolic content and concentration of flavonoids of methanolic extract of leaf, stem and fruit of an important medicinal plant Murraya koenigii Linn. Methods: Phytochemical screening of extracts was carried out. Aluminium chloride colorimetric method was used to estimate TFC (total flavonoid content) and TPC (total phenolic content) was measured by Folin-ciocalteu method. Two different assays- DPPH free radical scavenging and LPO were used for determination of antioxidant activity.
Results: Quantitative estimation of primary metabolites showed maximum amount of sugar, starch in stem, while lipid and protein in leaf. The TPC were ranging between 18.4±0.21 to 25.2±0.16 mg GAE/gm DW while TFC were found maximum 13.53±0.16 mg QE/gm DW in leaves. The DPPH radical scavenging capacity was found maximum in leaves (IC50 49.86±1.16) and maximum activity in LPO assay was shown by leaf extract (23.715±1.68 μM MDAg-1DW). Conclusions: These results are suggestive of primary bioactive compounds of commercially importance and also Murraya koenigii Linn is effective against free radical mediated diseases.
Key words: |
Murraya koenigii Linn, Free radical scavenging activity, LPO, Phytochemicals
INTRODUCTION: Plants are found to be source of many chemical compounds which occur naturally in plants known as phytochemicals. Primary metabolites are compounds synthesized by plants for both essential and specific functions, such as growth and development 1.
Plants have been used as alternative remedy for the treatment of various ailments since ancient times
In recent years considerable research has been progressed in the exploitation of medicinal plants, in the treatment of various stress related disorders caused by metabolism of oxygen leads to generation of free radicals. Natural antioxidants either in the form of raw extracts or their chemical constituents are very effective to prevent the destructive processes caused by oxidative stress 2.
Antioxidants are the substance that when present in low concentrations compared to those of an oxidisable substrate significantly delays or prevents oxidation of that substance 3. Antioxidant-based drug formulations are used for the prevention and treatment of complex diseases like atherosclerosis, stroke, diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease and cancer 4. Murraya Koenigii, belongs to the family Rutaceae, commonly known as curry-leaf tree, is a native of India, Sri Lanka and other south Asian countries. The presence of important phytochemicals make the plant useful for treating different ailments and have a potential of providing useful drugs of human use. M. koenigii is credited with tonic and stomachic properties. Bark and roots are used as stimulant and externally to cure eruptions and bites of poisonous animals. Green leaves are eaten raw for cure of dysentery, diarrhoea and for checking vomiting. This plant has been reported to have cytotoxic, antimicrobial, antibacterial, anti ulcer, and cholesterol reducing activities 5, 6.
The present study was designed to investigate the TPC and TFC and to evaluate the antioxidant activities of methanol extract of leaf, stem and fruit of Murraya Koenigii. The qualitative and quantitative estimation of primary metabolites was also done.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Plant material:
Leaf, stem and Fruits of Murraya koenigii Linn were collected from Rajasthan university campus, Jaipur. It was authenticated as RUBL 211431 by Herbarium, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Preparation of plant extract:
Crude plant extract was prepared by Soxhlet extraction method. About 50gm of powdered plant material was packed in a thimble and extracted successively with 350ml of petroleum ether, ethyl acetate and methanol. The process of extraction is carried out until the solvent in siphon tube of an extractor become colorless. The extract was taken in a petriplate and kept in hot air oven and heated at 30-40ºC till the solvent got evaporated.
Preliminary Phytochemical Screening:
Phytochemical screening of active plant extracts was done by following the standard methods 7 for the qualitative analysis of various phytochemicals such as carbohydrates, proteins, alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, phytosterols and tannins.
Powder Behavior Analysis:
Treatment of powder with different chemical reagents- acids like 1N HCl, H2SO4, HNO3, Acetic acid and alkaline solutions like 1N NaOH and iodine was studied to detect the presence of phytoconstituents with color changes under daylight.
Quantification of Primary Metabolites:
Stem, leaf and fruit of Murraya koenigii were evaluated quantitatively to estimate the total levels of soluble sugars, starch, proteins, lipids, chlorophyll and carotenoids following the established methods for the sugars, starch, lipid, protein and chlorophyll and carotenoids 8, 9, 10. All experiments were repeated in triplicate and data were calculated as mean ±S.E.M.
Determination of total phenolic content:
Total phenolic content were analyzed spectrophotometrically using a modified Folin-Ciocalteu colorimetric method 11. 125μl of the standard Gallic acid solution or sample extract was mixed with 0.5 ml of distilled water in a test tube followed by 125 μl of Folin- Ciocalteu reagent. The samples were mixed well and allowed to stand for 6 min before 1.25 ml of a 7% of sodium carbonate was added. Water was added to adjust the final volume to 3ml. After incubation at room temperature for 90min, the absorbance was recorded at 760nm. All experiments were repeated three times for precision and values were expressed in mean±standard deviation in terms of phenolic content (Gallic acid equivalent, GAE) per g dry weight
Determination of total flavonoid content:
Flavonoid quantification was done using aluminium chloride colorimetric method 12. Plant extracts (0.5 ml) were mixed with 1.5 ml of methanol, 0.1 ml of 10 % aluminium chloride, 0.1 ml of 1 M potassium acetate and 2.8 ml of distilled water and kept at room temperature for 30 min. The absorbance of the reaction mixture was measured at 415nm. All experiments were repeated three times for precision and values were expressed in mean±standard deviation in terms of flavonoid content (Quercetin equivalent, QE) per g dry weight.
DPPH radical scavenging capacity:
The antioxidative activity of the extracts was elucidated by 2, 2- diphenyl-1- picryhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging capacity of the extracts 13. 1, 1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) as free radical form (90% purity) was obtained from Sigma–Aldrich. DPPH solution (0.004% w/v) was prepared in methanol. Two ml of this solution was added to a sample solution (0.1ml, 1mg/ml in methanol). After 30 min, absorbance at 515nm was measured and the percentage of radical scavenging activity was calculated from the following equation:
% Radical scavenging =
(1-Abs. sample/Abs. control) ×100
Abs. control is the absorbance of the DPPH solution without sample. IC50 values denote the concentration of sample, which is required to scavenge 50% of DPPH free radicals.
Lipid peroxidation assay:
Lipid peroxidation was measured in terms of content of malondialdehyde (MDA. ɛ= 155 m mol-1 cm-1), a product of lipid peroxidation., following the method of heath and packer (1968). Plant samples (0.5 g) were homogenized in 10 ml 0.1% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid (TCA). The homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 g, 40 C for 10 min. In 1 ml aliquot of supernatant, 4 ml 0.5% (w/v) thiobarbituric acid (TBA) in 20% (w/v) TCA was added. The mixture was heated at 950 C for 30 min and then quickly cooled in an ice bath. OD600 values was subtracted from the MDA-TBA complex values at 532 nm.
MDA concentration was calculated by using an extinction coefficient ε Μ= 155 mM-1cm-1. Results are presented as μmols MDA g-1FW.
RESULTS:
TABLE 1: PRELIMINARY PHYTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF MURRAYA KOENIGII L.
Phyto Chemicals | Test performed | Pet Ether | Ethyl acetate | Methanol | |||||||
Leaf | Stem | Fruit | Leaf | Stem | Fruit | Leaf | Stem | Fruit | |||
Extractive value
(mg/gdw) |
1.4 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 5.7 | 12.4 | 15.9 | ||
Phy. App. | D-G Sticky | Y-G | Pale Y | D-G Sticky | Y-G | B-G | D-G | Y-G | Y-B
Sticky |
||
Dry | Dry | Dry | Viscous | Dry | Dry | ||||||
Carbohydrates | Molish test | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | + | + | + | |
Proteins | Millon’s test | + | + | + | + | _ | + | + | + | + | |
Flavonoids | Shinoda test | + | _ | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
Alkaloids | Dragendorff’s test | + | + | + | + | _ | + | + | + | + | |
Triterpenoids | Noller’s test | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
Tannins | Neutral FeCl3 | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | + | _ | + | |
Phytosterols | Libermann burchard’s test | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
(+) Positive, (-) Negative
TABLE 2: BEHAVIOR OF AERIAL PARTS OF (POWDERED) MURRAYA KOENIGII ON THE TREATMENT WITH DIFFERENT CHEMICAL REAGENTS
S.No. | Treatment | Color after treatment in day light |
1. | Powder + HCl | YW-GN |
2. | Powder + Acetic acid | YW-GN |
3. | Powder +10% NaoH + drop of CuSo4 | GN-BN |
4. | Powder + Conc. H2So4 | RD-BN |
5. | Powder +Acetic acid + Conc. H2So4 | DA-GN |
6. | Powder +HNO3 | YW-BN |
7. | Powder +HNO3 + excess NH3 | DA-YW |
8. | Powder + 5% FeCl3 | DA-GN |
9. | Powder +FeCl3 + Conc. H2So4 | YW-GN |
10. | Powder + 5% I2 | GN-YW |
Quantification of primary metabolites:
TABLE 4: TOTAL PHENOLIC AND TOTAL FLAVONOID CONTENT IN DIFFERENT PLANT PARTS OF MURRAYA KOENIGII LINN
Plant parts Total Phenolic content Total Flavonoid content
(mg GAE/gm DW) (mg QE/gm DW)
Leaf 25.2±0.16 13.53±0.16
Stem 19.9± 0.12 5.7± 0.08
Fruit 18.4± 0.21 4.03± 0.04
Mean ± Standard Deviation
TABLE 5: ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITY OF DIFFERENT PARTS OF MURRAYA KOENIGII LINN.
Plant
Parts |
DPPH free radical scavenging (IC50) | Lipid Peroxidation
µmols MDA g-1 DW |
Leaf | 49.86±1.16 | 23.715±1.68 |
Stem | 53.01±0.96 | 19.685±1.52 |
Fruit | 53.83±1.49 | 7.285±1.21 |
Mean ± Standard Deviation
Statistical analysis:
All experimental results were carried out in triplicate and were expressed as average of three analyses±SD(Standard Deviation). The IC50 values were also calculated by linear regression analysis.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Maximum yield were found in methanol extract (34%). Total extractive values are shown in Table 1. Preliminary phytochemical investigation revealed that petroleum ether extract contains proteins, alkaloids, terpenoids and flavonoids, phytosterols, ethyl acetate extract contains flavonoids, alkaloids, terpenoids, and proteins, methanolic extract contains alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, carbohydrates and proteins, (Table 1). The powdered material of Murraya koenigii treated with different acids, bases and other chemicals. After treatment powder observed and fluorescence were tabulated in Table 2.
Leaf, stem and fruit of Murraya koenigii was evaluated quantitatively for the analysis of total soluble sugars, protein, starch, and lipid (Fig. 1).
The screening of plant parts revealed that the amount of the total phenolic contents were higher in the leaf 25.2±0.16 mg GAE/gm DW), while lower amount 18.4± 0.21 mg GAE/gm DW) was observed in fruit part of this plant. Flavonoids are regarded as one of the most widespread groups of natural constituents found in plants. The amount of flavonoid content was decreased as leaf > stem > fruit and ranging between 4.03± 0.04 to 13.53±0.16 mg QE/gm DW. (Table1). The DPPH radical scavenging activity was decreased as leaf> stem > fruit (Table 2). The screening of the leaf, stem and fruit of the plant indicates that the presence of high phenolic compounds may be due to the presence of tannins and flavonoid which are known to possess antioxidant activities 14, 15, 16.
In lipid peroxidation assay, the extract significantly reduced MDA level. The highest MDA level was found to be 23.715±1.68 µmols MDA g-1 DW in leaf extract. MDA formation is the result of oxidation and enzymatic degradation of poly unsaturated fatty acids. It gives reddish color with TBA and is an indicator of lipid peroxidation. 17.
In conclusion, Murraya koenigii Linn have different concentrations of the total phenolic contents and flavonoid in various plant parts which possess the antioxidant activity of the plant. The high contents of phenolic compounds indicated that these compounds contribute to the strong antioxidant activity. It has been shown that the scavenging effects on the DPPH radical scavenging activity increased with the increasing concentration of the samples to a certain extent and hence are said to be strongly dependent on the extract concentration.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The one of the author Pratima Vijayvargia is grateful to the Department of Botany for providing facilities and UGC for providing financial support as student fellowship (BSR).
REFERENCES:
- Santhi R, Lakshmi G, Priyadharshini AM and anandaraj L: Phytochemical screening of Nerium oleander leaves and Momordica charantia leaves. International research journal of pharmacy 2011; 2 (1): 131-135.
- Zengin G, Cakmak YS, Guler GO and Aktumsek A: Antioxidant properties of methanolic extract and fatty acid composition of Centaurea urvillei DC. subsp. hayekiana Wagenitz. Rec Nat Prod 2011; 5:123–132.
- Praveen K and Awang B: Antioxidant activity, total phenolic and flavonoid content of morinda citrifolia fruit extracts from various extraction processes. JESTEC 2007; 2: 70-80.
- Khalaf NA, Shakya AK, Al-Othman A, El-Agbar Z and Farah H: Antioxidant activity of some common plants. Turk J Biol 2008; 32: 51-5.
- Xie JT, Chang WT, Wang CZ, Mehendale SR, Li J and Ambihaipahar R: Curry leaf Murraya koenigii Spreng. reduces blood cholesterol and glucose levels in ob/ob mice. The American Journal of Chinese Medicine 2006; 34: 279-284.
- Kumar VS, Sharma A, Tiwari R and Kumar S: Murraya koenigii: A review. J of Med and Aromat Plant Sci 1999; 21: 1139-1144.
- Kokoshi CJ, Kokoshi RJand Sharma FT: Fluorescence of powdered vegetable drug under ultraviolet radiation. J of American Pharmaceu Associa1958; 47: 715-717.
- Dubois MK, Gilles Hamilton JK, Rebers PA and Smith F: A colorimetric method for the determination of sugar. Nature1951; 168:167.
- Jayaraman J. Laboratory manual in biochemistry: Wiley Eastern Limited, New Delhi 1991; 96-97.
- Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL and Randall RJ: Protein measurement with the Folin- phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem 1952; 193: 265-275.
- Dewanto V, Wu X, Adom, KK and Liu RH: Thermal processing enhances the nutritional values of tomatoes by increasing the total antioxidant activity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2002; 50: 3010-3014.
- Chang C, Yang M, Wen H and Chern J: Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colorimetric methods. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis 2002; 10: 178-182.
- Hasan MS, Ahmed MI, Mondal S, Uddin SJ, Masud MM, Sadhu SK and Ishibashi M: Antioxidant, antinociceptive activity and general toxicity study of Dendrophthoe falcata and isolation of quercitin as the major component. OPEM 2006; 6: 355-60.
- Aderogba MA, Okoh EK and Idowu TO: Evaluation of the antioxidant activity of the secondary metabolites from Pilostigma reticulatum (DC.) Hochst Biol Sci 2005; 5: 239-242.
- Motalleb G, Hanachi P, Kua SH, Fauziah O and Asmah R: Evaluation of phenolic content and total antioxidant activity in Berberis vulgaris fruit extract. J Biol Sci 2005; 5: 648-653.
- Heim KE, Tagliaferro AR and Bobilya DJ: Flavonoid antioxidants: Chemistry, metabolism and structure-activity relationships. J Nutr Biochem 2002; 13: 572-584.
- Hodges DM, DeLong JM, Firney CF and Prange RK: Improving the thiobarbituric acid reactive substance assay for estimating lipid peroxidation in plant tissue containing anthocyanin and other interfering compounds. Planta 1998; 207: 604-611
How to cite this article:
Vijayvargia P and Vijayvergia R: Assesment of Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activity of Murraya Koenigii Linn. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2016; 7(5): 2163-67.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.7(5).2163-67.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
43
2163-67
328
1633
English
IJPSR
Pratima Vijayvargia* and Rekha Vijayvergia
Plant Pathology and Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, India.
pratimavijay02@gmail.com
09 December, 2015
28 January, 2016
13 February, 2016
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.7(5).2163-67
01 May 2016