ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS CONTENT OF SOME PLANT BASED MEDICINES IN PARTS OF SOUTHERN NIGERIA, WEST AFRICA
HTML Full TextASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS CONTENT OF SOME PLANT BASED MEDICINES IN PARTS OF SOUTHERN NIGERIA, WEST AFRICA
R. Nwachukwu Ekere*1, N. Janefrances Ihedioha 1, I. Jude Ayogu 1, I. Fausta Ogbefi-Chima 3, U. Simon Onoja2 and L. Ogechi Alum 1
Department of Pure and Industrial Chemistry 1, Department of Home Science, Nutrition and Dietetics 2, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
Nigerian Raw Materials Research and Development Council 3, Enugu, Nigeria.
ABSTRACT: The concentration levels and human health risk of iron, cadmium, zinc, nickel, copper and lead were determined in 25 popularly consumed types of commercially available herbal drugs in Southern Nigeria. In each type, three brands were selected and analysed. The study area was divided into five sampling zones (A - E) and the herbal drugs were categorized into five clusters based on their advertised usage. The samples were digested using HNO3: HClO4 mixture in the ratio of (4:1) and metals analysis were carried out using Atomic Absorption spectrophotometer. The results showed the concentration of the metals in the ranges: Fe = 4.524 ± 0.011 to 70. 121 ± 0.002 µg/g; Cd = 0.012 ± to 0.620 ± 0.002 µg/g; Zn = 0.03 ± 0.01 to 42.010 ± 3.40 µg/g; Cu = 0.160 ± 0.000 to 66.21 ± 2.11 µg/g and Pb = BDL to 22.011 ± 0.850 µg/g. The provisional weekly intake (PWI) of the metals did not exceed the recommended provisional weekly tolerable intake (PTWI) except nickel in 5 samples. The heavy metal pollution index (HMPI) in the five sampling locations indicated a trend: D > C > E > B > A. Seventeen brands of the studied herbal drugs had Fe, Cd, Ni, Cu and Pb levels higher than the WHO/FAO limits. Consumption of these studied herbal drugs ought to be monitored regularly to prevent toxic metals poisoning due to elevated levels of these metals.
Keywords: |
Trace metals, Herbs, Bioaccumulation, Pollution index, Medicine
INTRODUCTION: The use of herbs as medicine is the oldest form of healthcare known to humanity and has been used in all cultures throughout history. About 70 - 85% of the world’s population mainly in developing countries today still banks on non-conventional medicine in their primary health care as reported by World Health Organization (WHO) 1. The general public perception that herbal drugs are safer and harmless because they are natural plant-based material is untrue.
Research results have shown that plants not only contain toxic secondary metabolites but are often contaminated with environmental pollutants especially heavy toxic metals which are hazardous to all living organisms on exposure 2, 3. Heavy metals contamination of herbal preparations is common place in earlier reports 4 - 8. The heavy metals contamination in traditional medicines may occur due to polluted environment in which the herbal plants grow 9; the polluted conditions in which the plants are dried and processed, the storage conditions and / or even adulterated purposefully by the manufacturer of the products in the final dosage form 10.
Heavy metals presence in the environment as a result of agricultural, industrial, commercial and domestic activities lead to their bioaccumulation in the food chain. Increasing concern and fear have also been expressed on the unsupervised use, efficacy, toxicity and quality of these natural products as well as the legal responsibilities of their practitioners. Rigorous qualitative and quantitative assessment of these products is necessary to minimize the risks to humans and other animals due to unintentional or intentional metal exposure at above tolerable limits resulting from herbal drugs ingestion or usage 10. Agencies such as Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) and World Health Organisation have highlighted these critical issues and strongly recommended toxic heavy metal analysis in the herbal medicines along with other necessary biological, chemical and environmental analysis in their guidelines and also documented the dietary allowances, absorption, elimination and toxic profiles of heavy metals 11.
In Nigeria, most trado-medicine producers and dealers sell their products in local markets, along busy highways, in buses and motor parks where they display them openly. Few of these drugs are also displayed in pharmaceutical shops and patent medicine stores. Some of these drugs are listed by National Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC), the statutory body vested with power to regulate food and drugs in Nigeria. The mode of production either machine or manually blended, storage containers and distribution channels are some of the routes by which heavy metals taint local herbal drugs 11.
The objectives of this study were to: (a) determine the concentrations of Fe, Cd, Ni, Zn and Pb in selected types / brands of ready-to-use and commonly available herbal drugs in South Eastern Nigerian markets (b) assess the potential human risk associated with consumption of these drugs due to their studied metals contamination (c) determine the heavy metals pollution index of the metals and (d) by comparison with set standards establish the safety or otherwise arising from consumption of these herbal preparations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Samples and Sampling Technique: A total of 75 samples of liquid herbal drugs prepared for in-vitro oral administration were selected randomly from herbal medicine vendors and pharmaceutical shops in five randomly selected cities across the southern region of Nigeria namely Owerri Enugu, Lagos metropolis, Aba and Uyo. The samples were selected from 25 types of herbal drugs with different curative agents. The drugs were divided into five clusters (C1 – C5) indicating their advertised therapeutic effects thus: C1 – antimalaria / thypoid drugs; C2 – Antibiotics; C3 – Analgesics; C4 – immune booster and C5 – power/energy drinks. A total of 65 sampled drugs were listed by the government agency authorized to do so which in National Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) of Nigeria but some were not. A total of 5 brands were selected from each cluster and sampled three times at monthly intervals.
Chemicals and Reagents: All chemicals and reagents used in this study were of analytical grade: Nitric acid 65% (1.40, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), Perchloric acid 70% (1.33, Merck, Darnsadt, Germany) were used as supplied without further purification. Deionised water was used as diluents and for washings.
Sample Preparation and Analysis: All glassware were soaked in 5% nitric acid for 2 hours and then washed with de-ionized water prior to use. All the samples were digested using acid mixture of HNO3 and HClO4 in 4: 1 ratio. Each of the herbal drug samples (1.0 g) was precisely weighed in a previously cleaned and weighed beaker on an electronic balance (Bosch D.7455). Concentrated HNO3 (20 ml) was added and allowed to stand overnight. The solution was heated carefully in water bath until the production of red nitrous fumes had ceased and allowed to cool at room temperature and 70% HClO4 (5 ml) was heated first in a water bath for 30 minutes and added to the mixture. The acids/drug mixture was heated with an electric heater confined in a fume cupboard for 15 minutes which reduced the volume of the solution to 10 ml. It was diluted with de-ionized water to 30 ml and filtered with a whatmann filter paper (no. 42) into a 50 ml volumetric flask and made up to mark using de-ionized water. Blanks were also prepared and digested just as the samples. A standard GFS Fisher’s AAS reference standard stock solutions of the studied metals containing 1000 ppm were diluted serially with HCl: HNO3 (3:1) ratio to achieve solutions of 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10 and 20 ppm concentrations.
The standards were used to generate calibration curves for the metals before analysis of the sample. Calibration curves of the metals showed linearity and the R2 values for all the metals were above 0.980. Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (model AA320N, Wincom Coy Ltd., China) was used and the standard operating conditions of the Spectrophotometer is shown in Table 1. Analysis of the different samples of each brand was done in triplicates (n = 3) and mean and standard deviation of the concentration of each metal in each sample were calculated and recorded as the amount of the metal in the sample.
TABLE 1: OPERATION CONDITIONS OF AAS FOR ANALYSIS OF THE HEAVY TOXIC METALS
Working parameter | Fe | Cd | Ni | Zn | Cu | Pb |
Wavelength (nm) | 248.3 | 228.8 | 232.0 | 213.9 | 324.7 | 217.0 |
Cathode lamp current (mA) | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Flame type | Air -acetylene | Air -acetylene | Air -acetylene | Air- acetylene | Air- acetylene | Air- acetylene |
Integration time (s) | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Air flow (L min-1) | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 |
Acetylene flow (L min-1) | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
LOD | 0.004 | 0.007 | 0.010 | |||
LOQ | 0.011 | 0.020 | 0.040 |
Health Risk Assessment: The health risk of ingesting the heavy metals via consumption of the each sampled herbal drugs was assessed by calculating the daily intake (DI) and provision for weekly intake (PWI) of the metals from the drugs considered in the light of the manufacturers’ maximum recommended dosages. Hence by multiplying the daily drug intake dosage by the mean concentration of each metal in the sample gave the amount of metal ingested by the users per day while the PWI was got by multiplying the daily ingested metal concentration by seven. These values of PWI got were compared with the provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI) of the metals as recommended by World Health Organisation (WHO) and other authorities for an average adult of 60 kg body weight 11. Also, the heavy metal pollution index (HMPI) for each sampled station was determined to compare the total heavy metals content in the herbal medicines at different sampling locations. Using the equation given by users Usero and Co - workers 12.
HMPI = (Cf1 x CF2 x CF3 ………..x CFn)1/n
Where Cf1 is the concentration of the heavy metal in the Sample drug 1 and n in the number of different samples from the location.
Applying the equation to here, HMPI for sampling station A is given as
HMPI = (FeA X CdA X NiA X ZnA X CuA X PbA)1/6
Where FeA is the mean concentration of Iron in location A and so on.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The result obtained from the metals analysis is presented in Table 2. The percentage concentrations of Fe in the clusters were 22.14, 19.50, 12.92, 25.01 and 20.40 in antimalaria (C1), Antibiotics (C2), Analgesics (C3), Immune boosters (C4) and Power/energy drinks (C5) respectively. The Cd distribution in the studied drug clusters were 44.52%, 3.13%, 17.91%, 13.57% and 20.87% in C1, C2, C3, C4 and C5 respectively. The levels of Ni in the drug clusters were in the order of 21.22, 15.53, 19.47, 28.57 and 15.11% in C1 to C5 while Zn has the following percentages in same order: 14.75, 18.88, 18.06, 24.25 and 24.10. Also, percentage levels of Cu in the drugs were 12.61, 10.97, 15.37, 21.43 and 39.62 in C1 to C5 respectively while that of Pb were 7.67, 15.64, 11.84, 30.37 and 34.48 in similar order.
The Fe mean concentration in the sampled herbal drugs are of the ranged between 4.524 - 70.121 µg/g in and Cd contents of the samples were of the ranges 0.012 ± 0.011 to 0.620 ± 0.002 µg/g. The concentrations of Ni in the samples range from below detection level (bdl) 22.44 ± 3.01 µ g/g while Zn concentration ranged from as low as 0.03 ± 0.01 µg/g to as high as 42.01 ± 3.40 µg/g in the samples. The levels of Pb in the samples are of the range BDL to 18.92 µg/g in the content levels of Cu in the samples were of the range 0.16 ± 0.00 - 66.21 ± 2.11 µg/g in the sampled herbal drugs. The health risk assessment results are presented in Table 3 and 4.
TABLE 2: HEAVY METALS CONTENTS (µg/g ± SD) OF HERBAL DRUGS
S. no. | Cluster | Sample | Fe | Cd | Ni | Zn | Cu | Pb |
1 | C1
Anti- malaria |
C1A
C1B C1C C1D C1E |
30.235±0.001
44.805±0.012 30.752±0.112 70.121±0.002 40.932±0.014 |
0.044±0.000
0.012±0.011 0.620±0.002 0.374±0.102 0.232±0.002 |
2.620±0.048
0.851±0.01 11.212±0.31 18.750±1.85 7.162±0.91 |
1.050±0.001
10.236±0.012 0.801±0.001 21.65±0.013 10.25±0.001 |
0.500±0.001
4.001±0.75 12.101±1.02 12.450±0.11 11.013±0.03 |
BDL
1.022±0.01 2.621±0.05 5.400±0.09 0.451±0.031 |
2 | C2
Antibiotics
|
C2A
C2B C2C C2D C2E |
20.0161±0.001
40.035±0.011 30.135±0.023 60.350±0.011 40.163±0.021 |
0.020±0.000
0.016±0.002 0.016±0.000 0.024±0.002 0.014±0.011 |
BDL
2.650±0.14 6.000±0.11 14.221±1.19 6.901±0.92 |
20.025±0.00
22.124±1.011 12.850±0.000 30.014±3.121 4.235±0.011 |
1.201±1.02
6.020±0.14 11.153±0.11 10.021±2.11 6.452±0.65 |
0.652±0.08
6.122±0.05 2.630±0.03 8.511±0.10 1.622±0.04 |
3 | C3
Analgestics
|
C3A
C2B C3C C3D C3E |
20.133±0.011
30.450±0.012 4.524±0.011 30.850±0.112 40.454±0.102 |
0.027±0.000
0.121±0.001 0.024±0.002 0.304±0.002 0.040±0.011 |
1.637±0.11
4.440±0.65 14.011±1.50 12.450±2.10 4.752±0.90 |
0.061±0.001
2.754±0.310 15.130±0.134 28.550±2.150 7.400±0.511 |
0.160±0.00
8.150±0.45 14.321±1.45 12.033±4.21 14.152±1.11 |
0.100±0.000
4.321±0.06 2.742±0.03 4.233±0.21 3.420±0.05 |
4 | C4
immune boosters
|
C4A
C4B C4C C4D C4E |
60.096±0.001
30.654±0.011 40.840±0.201 61.102±0.341 51.984±0.001 |
0.020±0.000
0.016±0.000 0.021±0.002 0.311±0.012 0.024±0.001 |
3.201±0.00
8.113±1.10 12.652±0.95 22.440±3.01 8.34±0.11 |
0.029±0.01
11.012±1.012 15.300±0.035 42.010±3.400 4.000±0.018 |
17.141±0.45
6.204±0.22 21.602±1.50 10.021±3.21 13.110±0.85 |
BDL
12.051±0.01 18.922±0.11 6.422±0.45 0.550±0.04 |
5 | C5
power/Energy Drinks
|
C5A
C5B C5C C5D C5E |
30.144±0.000
40.230±0.001 20.444±0.001 64.131±0.501 44.631±0.021 |
0.027±0.000
0.015±0.001 0.207±0.001 0.331±0.014 0.018±0.001 |
0.627±0.001
2.190±0.45 1.011±0.002 18.601±2.01 6.503±1.15 |
10.064±0.00
4.650±0.001 12.761±0.850 35.902±1.200 8.410±0.911 |
0.300±0.012
14.042±1.20 66.214±2.11 28.451±3.45 16.808±1.50 |
0.200±0.011
22.011±0.85 10.452±0.23 6.401±2.13 4.022±0.23 |
WHO/FAO
Standard (µg/g) (2002) *FDA (1999) |
60 | 0.3 | 0.1* | 60 | 3.0 | 5.0 |
BDL = below detection level
TABLE 3: WEEKLY INTAKE OF METALS (µg / WEEK) ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER’S DOSES FOR A 60kg BODY WEIGHT
Sample | Fe | Cd | Ni | Zn | Cu | Pb |
C1A | 63 | 0.924 | 55.02 | 22.05 | 10.50 | BDC |
C1B | 940.91 | 0.252 | 17.85 | 214.956 | 84.021 | 21.42 |
C1C | 643.70 | 13.020 | 235.41 | 16.821 | 254.10 | 55.02 |
C1D | 147.54 | 7.854 | 393.75 | 454.65 | 261.45 | 113.40 |
C1E | 859.59 | 4.872 | 150.36 | 215.25 | 231.21 | 9.45 |
C2A | 420.40 | 0.420 | BDL | 420.525 | 25.20 | 13.65 |
C2B | 840.765 | 0.336 | 53.76 | 464.604 | 126.42 | 128.52 |
C2C | 632.833 | 0.336 | 126.00 | 269.85 | 234.15 | 55.23 |
C2D | 1267.350 | 0.504 | 298.620 | 630.294 | 210.42 | 178.71 |
C2E | 843.430 | 0.294 | 144.900 | 88.935 | 135.45 | 34.02 |
C3A | 422.790 | 0.567 | 34.377 | 1.281 | 3.36 | 2.10 |
C3B | 639.450 | 2.541 | 93.24 | 57.834 | 171.15 | 90.72 |
C3C | 95.004 | 0.504 | 294.21 | 317.73 | 300.72 | 57.54 |
C3D | 647.850 | 6.384 | 261.45 | 599.55 | 252.63 | 88.83 |
C3E | 849.534 | 0.840 | 99.75 | 155.40 | 297.15 | 71.82 |
C4A | 1262.016 | 0.42 | 67.41 | 0.63 | 359.94 | BDC |
C4B | 643.734 | 0.336 | 170.31 | 231.25 | 130.20 | 253.05 |
C4C | 857.640 | 0.441 | 265.65 | 321.30 | 453.60 | 397.32 |
C4D | 1283.142 | 0.531 | 471.24 | 882.21 | 210.42 | 134.82 |
C4E | 1091.664 | 0.504 | 175.14 | 84.00 | 275.31 | 11.55 |
C5A | 633.024 | 0.567 | 13.251 | 211.34 | 6.30 | 4.20 |
C5B | 844.830 | 0.315 | 45.99 | 97.65 | 294.84 | 462.21 |
C5C | 429.324 | 4.347 | 21.21 | 267.96 | 1390.41 | 219.45 |
C5D | 1346.751 | 6.951 | 390.60 | 754.32 | 597.45 | 134.40 |
C5E | 937.211 | 0.378 | 136.50 | 176.61 | 354.48 | 84.42 |
PTWI | 56000 40 | 150 40 | 24541 | 13001 – 19000 41 | 630041 | 1500 40 |
TABLE 4: HMPI OF THE METALS IN SAMPLE LOCATIONS
Locations | Total Metal Content (µg) | ||||||
Fe | Cd | Ni | Zn | Cu | Pb | MPI | |
A | 160.62 | 0.14 | 8.08 | 31.23 | 19.30 | 0.95 | 6.86 |
B | 186.18 | 0.19 | 18.59 | 40.76 | 38.41 | 45.52 | 18.97 |
C | 122.69 | 0.87 | 44.88 | 66.84 | 46.84 | 37.36 | 28.71 |
D | 286.55 | 1.33 | 86.46 | 158.14 | 52.97 | 30.96 | 45.22 |
E | 218.15 | 0.31 | 33.55 | 34.30 | 70.90 | 10.06 | 19.53 |
The provisional weekly intake of the drugs were of the ranges 63.00 - 1346.31 µg/week; 0.232 - 13.00 µg/week, 17.35 - 431.24 µg/week; 0.63 - 883.21 µg/week; 3.36 - 1390.41 µg/week and 2.10 - 462.21 µg/week for Fe, Cd, Ni, Zn, Cu and Pb respectively. The heavy metal pollution indices of the studied area were 6.86 in Owerri; 18.97 in Enugu, 28.71 in Lagos; 45.22 in Aba and 19.53 in Uyo.
Fe was in excess of the WHO / FAO maximum permissible limit in 5 studied samples and was found highest in Anti malaria drugs but least in analgesics. Cd was found in excess in 40% of the drugs and these include four samples of antimalarias, three of analgesics, two of energy drinks and one sample of immune boosters. Also Ni was above the FDA maximum permissible limit in 96% of the studied samples but Zn was below the set limit in herbal drugs in all the samples.
However, Cu was above the set limit in 84% of the samples. The levels of Pb were higher than the permissible limit in seven samples amounting to 28% of the whole samples studied. The calculated provisional weekly intake (PWI) for all the metals did not exceed the recommended tolerable limit except that of Ni in seven samples. Hence, at the present rate of drug ingestion in the studied area, only Ni pose potential health risk. The HMPI was highest in location D (Aba) and least in location A (Owerri). The WHO / FAO recommended maximum allowable level is 60 µg/g.
The results of this study show a wide variation of Fe content in different herb samples. The result is comparable to values of Fe found in Egyptian spices and medicinal plants which ranged between 26.96 and 1046.25 mgkg−1 13. Fe plays many crucial roles in the human body including oxygen supply, energy production, and immunity. It facilitates the oxidation of carbohydrates, proteins and fats to control body weight, which is a very important factor is diabetes management. Iron is
necessary for the formation of haemoglobin and also plays an important role in oxygen and electron transfer in the human body.
Low iron content causes gastrointestinal infection, nose bleeding and myocardial infection 14 Iron toxicity has an adverse effect on various metabolic functions and cardiovascular system 15. Iron salts have astringent action which causes irritation of the gastrointestinal mucosa which gives rise to gastric discomfort, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea or constipation 16. When there is a high oral dose of iron, the astringent action of iron salts damages the mucosal cells. Severe damage may cause bleeding in the stomach or haematemesis and necrosis of mucosal cells may cause perforation of the gut wall 16. Location, D showed higher Cd contents in the anti malaria, analgesics, immune booster and power / energy drink samples.
There is the likelihood that sources of Cd pollution exist in location D which led to contamination of the herbal products. Cd is a toxicant and has been implicated in many disorders and its contamination of drugs may lead to cough, headache, cancer of the lungs, etc. 17, 18. The, concentration of Cd in these samples is low compared to the concentration of Cd in herbal drugs used as anti-malarial in Zaria 19 and as reported in 25 other herbal products sampled from eastern and western Nigeria 20 with Cd concentration ranging from 0.55 to 4.75 mg. The Cd levels found in some samples in the study were lower than those obtained by Hina et al., 21; Uddin et al., 22 and Nwoko and co – workers 23. However, Ekeanyanwu and co workers 24 did not detect Cd and Ni in the herbal drugs examined in their study but found other metals to be within the permissible limit recommended by regulatory agencies. Cadmium is among the most toxic natural elements.
The WHO maximum permissible limit (MPL) of Cd in medicinal herbs is 0.3 mg/kg 25 Chronic exposure to Cd causes kidneys and lungs failure, affect bones and stomach. The toxic effects of Cd on humans are same in both adults and children even though the experimental data showed that younger animals absorb more than adults 26. The high levels of cadmium possess a serious health risk on human health. Kidney is mostly the critical target organ in the exposed population. Excretion of Cd usually is very slow and it accumulates in human kidney for a relatively long time which may result in an irreversible impairment of the renal tract 27, 28. Also, at high concentrations, Cd produces serious effects on the liver and vascular and immune system 29.
Severe toxic symptoms as a result of Cd ingestion are reported between 10 - 326 mg and fatal ingestions of Cd, producing shock and acute renal failure do occur from ingestions exceeding 350 mg 30. An indication of cadmium nephrotoxicity, aminoaciduria, glycosuria and tubular necrosis has been detected at renal cadmium concentration of less than 50 μg/g tissue 31.
The values of Ni in all locations except for C2D location were higher than the FDA recommended limit of 0.1 µ g/g 32. However, WHO/FAO has not set permissible limit for Ni in 2005 32. Ni is widely distributed in the environment as a result of natural and anthropogenic activities. Despite the elevated amount of Ni in the drugs, toxicity of Ni in human body is rare due to its low absorption by the body 33, 34, 35. For example, in humans, the average nickel absorption is 27 ± 17% of the dose ingested in water and 0.7 ± 0.4% of the dose ingested in food 36. However, if Ni is taken orally in doses greater than 0.5 g some forms if nickel may be acutely toxic to humans affecting cardiovascular system, immune system and blood which may lead to kidney and liver damage 35, 36.
Coogan and co- workers 35 reported that many harmful effects of nickel ingestion are due to its interference with the metabolism of essential metals such as Fe (II), Mn(II), Ca(II), Zn(II), Cu(II), or Mg(II). Toxicity of nickel probably results from its ability to replace other metal ions in enzymes and proteins or to bind to cellular compounds containing oxygen, sulphur and nitrogen atoms thereby inhibiting their actions 35, 36. Overall, Zn concentrations were below the maximum permissible limit by WHO / FAD of 60 µg/g and consumption of the herbal drugs pose no immediate health risk 37. WHO in 2005 recommendation did not set new limit for Zn in herbal preparation 22.
Except for C1A, C2A, C3A and C5A samples, the rest had higher than permissible amount of Cu in them 38. This can be compared to medicinal herbs and herbal products analysed in Zagreb, China with the concentration of Cu ranging from 0.05 mg/kg to 0.5 mg/kg which is below permissible limit 39. Copper contamination of herbal drugs results from many sources such as utensils, polluted soil and fumigants used to preserve the herbal plant from destruction. Copper is an essential element for the human metabolic system which regulates various biological processes inside the body like oxidation-reduction reactions, energy production, connective tissues formation, iron metabolism, synthesis of neurotransmitter etc. 40, 41.
However, chronic exposure to high concentration of copper causes irritation of nasal mucosa, vomiting, nausea, diarrhoea, damaging kidney and liver 42. In humans, acute copper poisoning is rare and usually results from contamination of foodstuffs or beverages by copper containers or from the accidental or deliberate ingestion of large quantities of copper salt 43. Symptoms of acute copper poisoning include salivation, epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea, all of which are probably due to the irritant effect of copper on the gastrointestinal mucosa 43.
Lead is one of the highly toxic environmental pollutants and it can complex with various biomolecules which adversely affect their functions. Lead exposure may have an adverse effect on the blood, nervous, immune, renal, skeletal, muscular, reproductive, and cardiovascular systems causing poor muscle coordination, gastrointestinal symptoms, brain and kidneys damage, hearing and vision impairments, and reproductive defects 44, 45. Exposures to lead at early childhood and prenatally leads slowed cognitive development, learning deficits, and many other effects 44. The Food and Agricultural Organization / World Health Organization FAO / WHO has established a “provisional tolerable weekly intake” (PTWI) of 25 μg lead/kg body weight for humans.
Individually, the levels of Pb in sample clusters C1D, C2B, C2D, C4B, C4C, C4D, C5B, and C5D were above the WHO/FAO permissible limit for Pb in herbal drugs of 5.0 µg/g 46 while the rest were below the limit. The result was lower than earlier report In Pakistan where Mohammed and co-workers 7 found Pb to be 70.1 ± 0.00 µg/g and 49.528µg/g in branded herbal drugs. Also Edebi and Alade 46 found Pb in malarial and black herbal tea to be 102.22 µg/g in similar work. However, the result of this study was comparable to the Pb levels found in herbal tea and similar products 21. The Pb levels found in this study are lower than an earlier report conducted in some parts of the same study area 23. In the report, Nwoko and co - author 22 found the levels of Pb up to 4.8 µg/g in some locations.
Elevated levels of Pb in food and drug pose health risk to humans because Pb is a toxicant. At low levels Pb has been implicated in pregnancy miscarriages and low birth weight of babies, low sperm count and mortality in men 47; damage and reduction of antibody production and immuglobin forming cells and decrease in the performance of nervous system and renal clearance 48, 49.
The weekly intake of Fe, Cd, Zn, Cu and Pb form ingesting the herbal drugs did not exceed the provisional tolerable weekly drugs as, recommended by various bodies 11. However, the intake of Nickel (Ni) from seven samples (C1D, C2D, C3C, C3D, C4C, C4D and C5D) exceeded the allowed PTWI. Ingestion of these drugs may pose health hazard to consumers. The heavy metal pollution index of sampling locations indicated the trend: D > C > E > B > A. Hence location D with an HMPI of 45.22 showed highest pollution load of heavy metals studied while location A showed the lowest metal pollution load.
The presence of heavy metal may be the result of accidental contamination during manufacture, for instance, from grinding weights or lead-releasing containers or other manufacturing utensils Medicinal herbs may contain heavy metals when grown in seriously polluted soil. The use of agrochemical products on agricultural lands and some organic solvents used during the extraction and preparation of these herbal medicines can be a great source of physicochemical contaminants.
CONCLUSION: The results of the study showed that except for Zn, all other metals were in excess of the MRL in at least four samples of the drugs. Ni for instance was in excess in more than 80% of all the samples. The trend of the metals levels in the clusters were: Fe = C4 > C1 > C5 > C2 > C3; Cd = C1 > C5 > C4 > C3 > C2; Ni = C4 > C1 > C3 > C2 > C5; Zn = C4 > C5 > C2 > C3 > C1; Cu = C5 > C4 > C3 > C1 > C2 and Pb = C5 > C4 > C2 > C3 > C1. Ni was of potential risk in the drugs. The HMPI was highest in samples from location D which was Aba in Abia state. Although, most of the selected herbal drugs used for this analysis are listed by the National Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) in Nigeria, the fact that some of the herbal drugs are sold in the open market is very discouraging.
Herbal medicines have been used in clinical practice for ages but the toxicity of these herbal medicines has been of great concern. The presence of toxicants especially heavy metals results from many sources ranging from bioavailability in herbs grown in contaminated soils to the herbal drug manufacture processes. This reported work showed that some of the commercially available herbal drugs are tainted by the studied heavy metals and pose health risk when consumed by humans.
There is need for continuous monitoring of herbal drugs sold in the market to make sure wholesome and safe drugs are sold for human consumption.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT: The authors are grateful to their research assistant and laboratory attendants who wish to remain at the background.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: There is no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES:
- Inamdar N, Edalat S, Kowal VB and Pawar S: Herbal drugs in milieu of modern drugs Int J Green Pharm 2008; 2(1): 2-8.
- Obi E, Akunyili E and Orisakwe B: Heavy metal hazards in Nigeria herbal remedies. Sci Total Environt 2006; 369: 35-41.
- Arpadjan S, Celik G, Taskesen S and Ṻcer GS: Arsenic, cadmium and lead in medicinal herbs and their fractionations, Food Chem Toxicol. 2008; 46: 2871-2875.
- Martena MJ, Van Der Wielen JC, Rietjens IM, Klerx WN, De Groot HN, Konings EJ: Monitoring of mecury, arsenic and lead in traditional Asian herbal preparations on the Dutch market and estimation of associated risks. U.S National Library Medicinal Contribution Exposure Risk 2010; 27: 190-205.
- Roberts BS, Russell SP, Anusha, S, Nadia K, Roger BD, Janet P, Venkatesh T and De Stefano K: Lead, mercury and arsenic in US and Indian manufactured Ayuverdic medicines sold via the Internet, J Ame Med Assoc 2008; 300(8): 915-923.
- Bushra H, Ghazala HR and Shahid N: Determination of Toxic Metals in Some Metals in Some Herbal Drugs through Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy. Pak. Jf Pharm Sci 2011; 24(3): 353-358.
- Mohammed S, Naveed M, Harm K and Saeed AK: Analysis of Toxic heavy metals in Branded Pakistani, Herbal products. J Chem Soc Pak 2010; 32(4): 471 – 475.
- Kiran YK, Mir AK, Rrabia N, Mamoona M, Hina F, Paras M, Nighat S, Tasmia B, Ammarah K and Sidra NA: Element content analysis of plant of genius Ficus using AAS. African J Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 5(3): 317-321.
- Sayyed MRG and Sayadi MH: Variations in the heavy metal accumulation within the surface soils from the Chitgav Industrial area of Tehran, Proc Int Academy Ecol Environ Sci 2011; 1(1): 36-40.
- Nkansah MA, Hayford ST, Borquaye LS and Ephraim JH: Heavy metal contents of some medicinal herbs from Kumasi, Ghana Cogent Environ Sci 2016; 2: 1234660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2016.1234660.
- Guidelines for Assessing Quality of Herbal Medicines with Reference to Contaminants and Residues. Geneva, Switzerland; 2007.
- Usero JE, Gonza -Regalado E and Gracia I: Trace metal in the bivalve molluscs Ruditapes decyssatus and Ruditapes philippianrum from the Atlantic Coast of Southern Spain. Environ Int. 1997; 23: 291 – 298.
- Ziarati P: Determination of contaminants in some Iranian popular herbal medicines J Environ Anal Toxicol 2012; 2(1): 1–3.
- Maiga A, Diallo D, Bye R and Paulsen BS: Determination of some toxic and essential metal ions in medicinal and edible plants from Mali. J Agric Food Chem 2005; 53; 2316 - 2321.
- Marin S and Griswold W: Human health effects of heavy metals, in Environmental Science and Technology Briefs for Citizens, Center for Hazardous Substance Research, Manhattan, Kan, USA 2009; 15: 1–6,.
- Divrikh U, Horzum H, Soylak M and Eleil M: Trace heavy metal contents of some spices and herbal plants from West Antrolia, Turkey. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2006; 41(6): 712 – 716.
- Palizban A, Badii A, Asghari G and Nafchi M: Lead and cadmium contamination in seeds and oils of Brassica napus and Carthamus tinctorius grown in Isfahan Province Iran. Iranian J Toxicol 2015; 8: 1196–1202.
- Musa A and Hamza J: Comparison of Cadmium (Cd) content of Herbal Drugs used as Antimalarials and Chloroquine phosphate Syrups in Zaria, Nigeria. Nigerian J Pharma Sci. 2009; 8(1): 95-101.
- Obiajunwa EI, Adekele C, Adebajo L and Omobuwajo R: Essential and Trace Element Contents of Some Nigerian Medicinal Plants. J Radioanal Nuclear Chem 2009; 252(3): 473-476.
- Hina BG, Rizwawi GG and Nasser S: Determination of toxic metals in some herbal drugs through AAS. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2011; 24(3): 313 – 358.
- Uddin ABM, Khalid RS and Abbas SA: Determination of heavy metal concentration of different traditional medicine formulations available at the east coast region of Malaysia. African J Pharm Pharmacol 2012; 6(2): 1487 – 1491.
- Nwoko CO and Mgbeahurike C: Heavy metals contamination of ready to use herbal remedies in south eastern Nigeria. Pak J Nutri. 2011; 10(10): 959 – 964.
- Ekeanyanwu RC, Njoku JO, Nwodu PO and Njokuobi AE: Analysis of Some Selected Toxic Heavy Metals in Some Branded Nigerian Herbal Products Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science 2013; 3(04): 088-091,
- Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Food and Drug Administration Code by Fed Reg. 40 CFR 101.9, Washington DC 1999.
- Bourman WCR and MJ: Textbook of Pharmacology (2nd edition). Blackwell, Oxford, London, UK 1980.
- World Health Organization. WHO guidelines for assessing quality of herbal medicines with reference to contaminants and residues Geneva, 2007; 1–105.
- Saeed M, Muhammed N, Khan H and Khan SA: Analysis of toxic heavy metals in branded Pakistani herbal products. J. Chem. Soc. Pak. 2010; 32(4): 471 – 475.
- Li SM, Fang Y, Ning HM and Wu YX: Heavy metals in Chinese therapeutic foods and herbs, J Chem Soc Pakistan, 2012; 34(5): 1091–1095.
- Maobe MAG, Gatebe E, Gitu L and Rotich H: Profile of heavy metals in selected medicinal plants used for the treatment of diabetes, malaria and pneumonia in Kisii Region southwest Kenya, Global J Pharmacol. 2012; 6(3): 245– 251.
- Sivapermal P, Sankar JV and Nair PG: Heavy metal concentrations in fish, shellfish and fish products from internal markets of India visà-vis international standards. Food Chem 2007; 102: 612-620.
- Obi E, Akunyili DN, Ekpo B and Orisakwe OE: Heavy metal hazards of Nigerian herbal remedies. Sci. Total Environ 2006; 369: 35-41.
- World Health Organisation (WHO). Quality control for medicinal plants materials reused draft update, QAS/05, 131/Rev. 2005; 1: 22-27.
- Rania D, Safa A, Husna R and Munawwar AK. Determination of Heavy Metals Concentration in Traditional Herbs Commonly Consumed in the United Arab Emirates Journal of Environmental and Public Health 2015. Article ID 973878, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/ 973878
- Sunderman FW, Hopper SM, Sweeney KR, Marcus AH, Moss BM and Creason J: Nickel absorption and kinetics in human volunteers Proc So Exp Biol Med 1989; 191: 5-9.
- Coogan TP, Latta DM, Snow ET and Costa M: Toxicity and carcinogenicity of nickel compounds Critical Review Toxicol. 1999; 19(4): 341-349.
- Chodak AD and Blaszczyk U: The impact of Nickel in human health. J Elementol 2008; 13(4): 685 – 696.
- Das KK, Das SN and Dhundasi SA: Nickel, its adverse health effects and oxidative stress. Indian J Med Res, 2008; 128: 412 – 425.
- Scott-Fordsmand JJ: Toxicity of Nickel to soil organisms in Denmark Rev Environ Contamin Toxicol. 1997; 148: 1-9.
- World Health Organisation (WHO). The Importance of pharmacovigilance, safety monitoring of medicinal products. The Uppsala Monitoring Centre, WHO Collaborating Centre for International Drug Monitoring. WHO 2002.
- JECFA: (Joint IAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food and Diluted Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants. 33.9. Report WHO technical report series No 776.WHO Geneva 2000.
- Anke M, Angelow L, Glei M, Mueller M and Illing H: The biological importance of Nickel in the food chain. J. Anal Chem. 1995, 352: 92- 102.
- Linder MC and Hazegh-Azam, M: Copper Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Amer J. Clin. Nutri. 1996; 63: 797-1008.
- Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Toxicological Profile for Copper. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) Atlanta, GA; US Department of Public health and human Nutrition Services, Public Health Service 2004.
- Edebi NV and Alade OO: Evaluation of pharmacognostical parameters and heavy metals in some locally manufactured herbal drugs. J Chem Pharm Res, 2011; 3(2): 88 – 97.
- Johnson FM: “The genetic effects of environmental lead, Mutation Res - Reviews in Mutation Rese 1998; 410(2): 123–140.
- Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), Toxicological Profile for Lead (Update), Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Ga, USA 2007.
- Apostoli P, Kiss P and Porru S: Male reproductive toxicity of lead in animals and humans, Occup Environ Med. 1998; 55: 364 – 374.
- Salawu EO, Adeleke AA, Oyewo OO, Ashamu EA, Ishola OO, Afolabi AO and Adesanya TA: Prevention of renal toxicity from lead exposure by oral administration of Lycopersicon esculentum J Toxicol Environ Health Sci 2009; 1(2): 022 – 027.
- Gamil MA, El – Sayed ME and Osama MA: Effect of lead toxicity on co enzyme Q levels in rat tissues. African J Pharm Pharmacol 2009; 3(11): 568-572.
How to cite this article:
Nwachukwu RE, Janefrances NI, Jude IA, Fausta IOC, Simon UO and Ogechi LA: Assessment of heavy metals content of some plant based medicines in parts of Southern Nigeria, West Africa. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2018; 9(2):775-83.doi:10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(2). 775-83.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
46
775-783
461
1243
English
IJPSR
R. N. Ekere*, N. J. Ihedioha, I. J. Ayogu, I. F. Ogbefi-Chima, U. S. Onoja and L. O. Alum
Department of Pure and Industrial Chemistry, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
nwachukwuekere64@gmail.com
21 May, 2017
11 September, 2017
17 September, 2017
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(2).775-83
01 February, 2018