ASSESSMENT OF THE AWARENESS LEVELS TOWARDS VITAMIN D CHECK, MEDICATION AND RELATED DISORDERS
HTML Full TextASSESSMENT OF THE AWARENESS LEVELS TOWARDS VITAMIN D CHECK, MEDICATION AND RELATED DISORDERS
Khalid Farhan Alshammari * 1, Abdelmuhsin Omer Ahmed Hassan 1, Abdulrahman Ahmed Alkhateeb 1, Abdullah Dawas Altamimi 1, Abdulaziz Khalid AlShammari 1, Mohammed Salem Alharbi 1, Sumayyah Mohammad Almarshedy 1 and Hussain Gadelkarim Ahmed 2, 3
Department of Internal Medicine 1, College of Medicine, University of Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Pathology 2, College of Medicine, University of Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Histopathology and Cytology 3, FMLS, University of Khartoum, Sudan.
ABSTRACT: Background: Vitamin D deficiency and its associated disorders are prevalent in Saudi Arabia. This study aimed to assess the awareness levels towards vitamin D, check, medication, and related disorders. Methodology: In this cross-sectional study, a total of 500 Saudi volunteers living in the city of Hail (A region in Northern Saudi Arabia) and surrounding towns were included during the period from January 2020 to March 2020. Results: Out of the 500 participants, 295/500(59%) were found to complain from one or more VDD related conditions. Out of the 500 participants, only 214/500 (42.8%) experienced previous vitamin D testing. According to vitamin D testing results, 107/214 (50%) and 53/214 (24.8%) of the individuals did the test was found with vitamin D deficiency and vitamin D insufficiency, respectively. Conclusion: VDD is prevalent in Hail Region, Saudi Arabia, particularly among females. The scarcity of routine testing for vitamin D status resulted in multifarious VDD related disorders. Hail's population has a low awareness of vitamin D check, medication and related disorders.
Keywords: |
Vitamin D deficiency, Saudi Arabia, sunlight exposure, Vitamin D supplements
INTRODUCTION: Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is a major health problem afflicting over one billion people worldwide 1. In numerous countries, the inadequate exposure to natural sunlight and the intake of foods with poor in vitamin D contents embodying most populations around the globe at risk of VDD 2. Many diseases affecting humans are attributed to VDD. Multiple sclerosis, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease 3 and osteoporotic fractures 4, etc.
Vitamin D as a guardian of phenotypic stability through conserving the redox and Ca (2+) signaling systems. Vitamin D insufficiency results in a weakening in the stability of this regulatory signaling linkage, including a dysregulation in both reactive oxygen species (ROS) and Ca (2+) signaling. This is supposed to be responsible for numerous diseases 3. The vitamin D3 metabolite 1α, 25-dihydroxy vitamin D3 (1, 25 (OH)2 D3), which activates Vitamin D receptor (VDR).
VDR, besides its control of cellular metabolism, modulates mechanisms essential for immunity, including anti-microbial defense and the initiation of T cell tolerance 5. Low vitamin D is considered when the serum level is below 30ng/ml. Low vitamin D can be categorized into insufficient vitamin D (in the range of 21-29 ng/mL) and VDD (serum vitamin D below 21 ng/mL) 6.
VDD is prevalent in Saudi Arabia, particularly among women. The prevalence of VDD is reported to be over 80% in Saudi Arabia 7, 8. Diverse efforts are urgently needed to implement appropriate strategies to reduce the burden of VDD consequences in Saudi Arabia. Consequently, this study aimed to assess the awareness levels towards vitamin D, check, medication, and related disorders.
MATERIALS AND METHOD: In this cross-sectional study, a total of 500 Saudi volunteers living in the city of Hail (A region in Northern Saudi Arabia) and surrounding towns were included during the period from January 2020 to March 2020. Data were obtained from the general Saudi population. Adults aged 15 years or older were randomly selected regardless of gender, occupation, or marital status. A purposeful questionnaire was thoughtfully deliberated and used to collect the data. Each participant was interviewed to fulfill the variables including age, gender, symptoms of vitamin D deficiency, level of vitamin D (vitamin D deficiency defined as vitamin D level less than 20 ng/ml), treatment, and impact of vitamin D on the body and relation to diseases.
Ethical Consent: Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the ethical committee of the College of Medicine, University of Hail. All measures included in the current study comply with ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki declaration, as well as its related subsequent modifications. Ethical approval number: HREC 00113/CM-UOH.04/20
Statistical Analysis: Data was entered a computer software SPSS. Frequencies, percentages, and statistical values considering 95% confidence interval were calculated. The Chi-square test was calculated, P-value less than 0.05 considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Out of 500 Saudi volunteers invest-tigated 207 (41.4%) were males, and 293 (58.6%) were females, ages 15-67 years old with a mean ± STD age of 29 ±10.5 years. The bulk of the participants were at age group 19-24 years followed by 25-34 and 35-44 years, representing 187/500 (37.4%), 131/500 (26.2%), and 82/500(16.4%), in this order. Males and females have relatively similar age distribution with elevation in the upper mentioned groups, as indicated in Table 1 and Fig. 1. The majority of the study subjects were students followed by employees and self-employed constituting 219/500 (43.8%), 176/500 (35.2%), and 86/500 (17.2%), respectively. These occupations were similarly escalating in males and females groups, as indicated in Table 1, Fig. 1. Table 2 and Fig. 2, summarized the distribution of the study population VDD symptoms and estimated values. Out of the 500 participants, 295/500(59%) were found to complain from one or more VDD related conditions. The most-reported condition was tiredness, followed by bone pain and muscle pain constituting 66/295 (22.4%), 52/295 (17.6%), and 28/295 (9.5%), correspondingly. Most males were suffering from bone pain 33/99 (33.3%) followed by tiredness 28/99 (28.3%). Most females were tiredness 38/196 (19.4%) followed by bone pain 29/196 (14.8%). The risk of VDD related disorders was more common among women compared to men, the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI), RR (95% CI) = 1.3987 (1.1877 to 1.6472), P = 0.0001, as indicated in Table 2, Fig. 2.
TABLE 1: STUDY POPULATION BY DEMO-GRAPHICAL CHARACTERISTICS
Category | Variable | Males | Females | Total |
Age | ||||
≤18years | 25 | 19 | 44 | |
19-24 | 87 | 100 | 187 | |
25-34 | 51 | 80 | 131 | |
35-44 | 26 | 56 | 82 | |
≥45 | 18 | 38 | 56 | |
Total | 207 | 293 | 500 | |
Occupation | ||||
Self-employed | 12 | 74 | 86 | |
Students | 103 | 116 | 219 | |
Employees | 85 | 91 | 176 | |
Retired | 7 | 12 | 19 | |
Total | 207 | 293 | 500 |
FIG. 1: PROPORTIONS OF THE STUDY SUBJECTS BY DEMOGRAPHICAL CHARACTERISTICS
Out of the 500 participants, only 214/500 (42.8%) experienced previous vitamin D testing (72/207 (34.8%) were males, and 142/293 (48.5%) were females. Women were mutually doing testing compared to men, and this was found to be statistically significant (P = 0.0032), as indicated in Table 2, Fig. 2. According to vitamin D testing results, 107/214 (50%) and 53/2014(24.8%) of the individuals did the test was found with vitamin D and vitamin D insufficiency, respectively. Out of 160 persons with low vitamin D, 54/160 (33.8%) were males, and 106/160 (66.2%) were females. The risk of low vitamin D among women, RR (95% CI) was 1.3868 (1.0532 to 1.8261), P = 0.0198, as indicated in Table 2, Fig. 2. About 68/500(13.6%) of the study subjects have reported as having a chronic disease with the most frequent being hypertension 48/68(70.6%), as indicated in Table 2, Fig. 2.
TABLE 2: STUDY POPULATION BY VDD SYMPTOMS AND ESTIMATED VALUES
Category | Variable | Males (N=207) | Females (N=293) | Total (N=500) |
Do you suffer from any of the following symptoms? | ||||
Bone pain | 33 | 29 | 52 | |
Muscle pain | 12 | 16 | 28 | |
Depression | 13 | 10 | 23 | |
Tiredness | 28 | 38 | 66 | |
Miscellaneous symptoms | 23 | 103 | 126 | |
No symptoms | 108 | 97 | 205 | |
Have you been tested for vitamin D levels? | ||||
Yes | 72 | 142 | 214 | |
No | 116 | 143 | 259 | |
Don’t know | 19 | 8 | 27 | |
If you test it, what was the vitamin D level: (ng/ml) | ||||
0- <20 (deficiency | 35 | 72 | 107 | |
20-30 insufficiency | 19 | 34 | 53 | |
31-90 normal | 9 | 22 | 31 | |
>150 toxicity | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Don’t remember | 39 | 22 | 61 | |
never tested it | 104 | 143 | 247 | |
Were you diagnosed with one of these diseases | ||||
Bone deformity | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
Hypertension | 18 | 30 | 48 | |
Multiple sclerosis | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
CVD | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
Never have chronic disease | 181 | 251 | 432 |
Table 3 summarizes the distribution of the study population by vitamin D treatment status. About 190/500 (38%) denoted a previous intake of vitamin D therapy 64/207 (31%) were males, and 126/293 (43%) were females). Out of 190 persons, 37/190 (19.5%) have taken the medication without a prescription. Subsequent maintenance dose of vitamin D was received by 74/190 (39%) individuals, most of them were females. The distribution of the study population by follow up after treatment of vitamin D related disorders was summarized in Table 4. Out of the 190 patients underwent vitamin D treatment, 69/190 (36.3%) did subsequent vitamin D check test. About 118/190 (62%) experienced musculoskeletal symptoms improvement after the treatment course. Approximately 66/190 (34.7%) of the treated patients developed vitamin D levels declining following quitting of the treatment. Concerning, the distribution of the study population by vitamin D status and age VDD and /or insufficiency status was proportionally increasing with the increase of age, as indicated in Table 5, Fig. 3. Concerning occupation, low vitamin D levels were observed among employees followed by students, representing 82/160 (51.3%) and 42/160 (26.3%), respectively (see Table 6.). However, when calculating the percentage within the entire occupation, the values changes, as shown in Fig. 4.
TABLE 3: STUDY POPULATION BY VITAMIN D TREATMENT STATUS
Category | Variable | Males (N=207) | Females (N=293) | Total (N=500) |
Did you receive vitamin D treatment before? | ||||
Yes | 64 | 126 | 190 | |
No | 128 | 164 | 292 | |
Don’t know | 15 | 3 | 18 | |
Who gave you vitamin D treatment? | ||||
Doctor’s prescription | 54 | 106 | 160 | |
Pharmacist without prescription | 13 | 24 | 37 | |
Didn’t take medication | 140 | 163 | 303 | |
Did you receive the loading dose of vitamin D treatment? | ||||
Yes | 16 | 36 | 52 | |
No | 147 | 212 | 359 | |
Don’t know | 44 | 45 | 89 | |
Did you receive the maintenance dose of vitamin D treatment? | ||||
Yes | 21 | 53 | 74 | |
No | 146 | 200 | 346 | |
Don’t know | 40 | 40 | 80 |
TABLE 4: STUDY POPULATION BY FOLLOW UP AFTER-TREATMENT OF VITAMIN D RELATED DISORDERS
Category | Variable | Males (N=207) | Females (N=293) | Total (N=500) |
Did you check the level of vitamin D after treatment? | ||||
Yes | 18 | 51 | 69 | |
No | 47 | 74 | 121 | |
Don’t know | 7 | 11 | 18 | |
Didn’t take treatment | 135 | 157 | 292 | |
Did your musculoskeletal symptoms improve after the treatment course? | ||||
Yes | 42 | 76 | 118 | |
No | 10 | 36 | 46 | |
Don’t know | 18 | 22 | 40 | |
Didn’t take treatment | 137 | 159 | 296 | |
Did you notice that the level of vitamin D dropped again after stopping treatment? | ||||
Yes | 17 | 49 | 66 | |
No | 18 | 28 | 44 | |
Don’t know | 37 | 59 | 96 | |
Didn’t take treatment | 135 | 159 | 294 |
TABLE 5: STUDY POPULATION BY VITAMIN D STATUS AND AGE
Vitamin D Status | ≤18 years | 19-24 | 25-34 | 35-44 | ≥45 | Total |
Deficiency | 1 | 30 | 34 | 24 | 18 | 107 |
Insufficiency | 0 | 15 | 13 | 15 | 10 | 53 |
Normal | 3 | 13 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 31 |
Excess | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Didn’t remember | 13 | 20 | 13 | 9 | 6 | 61 |
Not done | 27 | 109 | 62 | 31 | 18 | 247 |
Total | 44 | 187 | 131 | 82 | 56 | 500 |
TABLE 6: STUDY POPULATION BY VITAMIN D STATUS AND OCCUPATION
Vitamin D Status | Self-employed | Students | Employees | Retired | Total |
Deficiency | 21 | 27 | 54 | 5 | 107 |
Insufficiency | 4 | 15 | 28 | 6 | 53 |
Normal | 6 | 16 | 9 | 0 | 31 |
Excess | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Didn’t remember | 11 | 29 | 21 | 0 | 61 |
Not done | 44 | 132 | 63 | 8 | 247 |
Total | 86 | 219 | 176 | 19 | 500 |
FIG. 4: DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY POPULATION BY VITAMIN D STATUS WITHIN THE ENTIRE OCCUPATION
DISCUSSION: VDD represents a major health problem in Saudi Arabia, particularly among women. The present study was showing that 59% of study subjects were complaining from VDD related symptoms with a significant increase among females (RR (95% CI) = 1.3987 (1.1877 to 1.6472), P = 0.0001). Moreover, only 42.8% of these patients did vitamin D investigation. These percentages were far less than reported values from Saudi Arabia, which might be attributed to the presence of asymptomatic individuals in this study. A Saudi study has reported a VDD prevalence of 83.6% (31.9% severe, 32.0% moderate, and 19.7% mild) 9.
Another systemic review showed a VDD prevalence of 81% among all Saudi population settings (newborns, children, adults, newborns, and pregnant/lactating women) 10. However, studies reported VDD among populations with the specific condition had indicated much less prevalence rates. A study reported a VDD prevalence of 60.8% among Saudi patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus 11. Another study has reported a VDD prevalence of 60.2% among Saudi women 7. The decreased rates of testing for VDD might be attributed to the lack of routine VDD testing required by health practitioners. The significant increase of testing among women (P = 0.0032) was in line with the predominant of VDD among females equated to males. VDD and vitamin D insufficiency were reported in 50% and 43.8% of group pregnant Saudi ladies 12. This was relatively similar to the findings in the current study; 50% and 24.8% were found with VDD and vitamin D insufficiency, respectively. Another study reported VDD (25(OH) D < 20 ng/mL) in 60.2% of studied Saudi women 7. In the present study, the risk of low vitamin D among women, RR (95% CI) was 1.3868 (1.0532 to 1.8261), P = 0.0198. In many countries, particularly Arabian states, women have less outdoor activities. Due to sociocultural restrictions on female physical activities, Saudi woman has the least level of physical activity compared to other Arabian countries 13. As it was well established that VDD is associated with several chronic diseases 14, approximately 13.6% of the participants in the present study were found with chronic diseases, with hypertension being the most prevalent. Such an assumption was previously reported 15.
In this study, about 38% denoted a previous intake of vitamin D therapy (31% males vs. 43% females). Although the prevalence rates of VDD (≥67.5%) and vitamin D insufficiency (≥21%) are high in Saudi Arabia 16, there is no available literature on the prevalence rates of vitamin D supplementation in the country 17. However, a high percentage of patients with VDD related symptoms reported improvement. Therefore, some studies have called for widespread recommendations for routine testing and vitamin D supplementation in Saudi Arabia among healthcare practitioners. Deficiencies related to factors such as sunlight exposure and nutrients intake should be encountered when assessing patients in Saudi Arabia 18. The present study was showing that VDD was more prevalent among the older population, which might be attributed to their relatively low outdoor activities. Moreover, the majority of those with VDD were employees, as this occupation frequently the indoor activity in most settings. The limitation of the present study includes its cross-sectional design and lack of some quantitative measures, though it provided an essential set of information useful for health policymakers and health practitioners.
CONCLUSION: VDD is prevalent in Hail Region, Saudi Arabia, particularly among females. The scarcity of routine testing for vitamin D status resulted in multifarious VDD related disorders. Hail's population has a low awareness of vitamin D check, medication, and related disorders. Vitamin D testing should be applied as a routine in primary health centers. Rising of population awareness toward VDD is highly recommended in Hail Region.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The authors would like to thank all participants for their time and support.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
REFERENCES:
- Holick MF: The vitamin D deficiency pandemic: Approaches for diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2017; 18(2): 153-65.
- Roth DE, Abrams SA and Aloia J: Global prevalence and disease burden of vitamin D deficiency: a roadmap for action in low- and middle-income countries. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2018; 1430(1): 44-79.
- Berridge MJ: Vitamin D cell signaling in health and disease. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 2015; 460(1): 53-71.
- Bouillon R, Marcocci C and Carmeliet G: Skeletal and extraskeletal actions of vitamin d: current evidence and outstanding questions. Endocrine Reviews 2019; 40(4): 1109-51.
- Carlberg C: Vitamin D signaling in the context of innate immunity: focus on human monocytes. Front Immunol 2019; 10: 2211.
- Bezuglov E, Tikhonova A and Zueva A: Prevalence and treatment of vitamin d deficiency in young male russian soccer players in winter. Nutrients 2019; 11(10): 2405.
- AlFaris NA, AlKehayez NM, AlMushawah FI, AlNaeem AN, AlAmri ND and AlMudawah ES: Vitamin D Deficiency and associated risk factors in women from riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Sci Rep 2019; 9(1): 20371.
- Alzaheb RA and Al-Amer O: Prevalence and Predictors of Hypovitaminosis D among Female University Students in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia. Clin Med Insights Women's Health. 2017; 10: 1179562X17702391.
- Hussain AN, Alkhenizan AH, El Shaker M, Raef H and Gabr A: Increasing trends and significance of hypovitaminosis D: a population-based study in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Arch Osteoporos 2014; 9: 190.
- Al-Daghri NM: Vitamin D in Saudi Arabia: Prevalence, distribution and disease associations. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2018; 175: 102-07.
- Darraj H, Badedi M and Poore KR: Vitamin D deficiency and glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Jazan City, Saudi Arabia. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 2019; 12: 853-62.
- Al-Faris NA: High Prevalence of Vitamin D Deficiency among Pregnant Saudi Women. Nutrients 2016; 8(2): 77.
- Alshaikh MK, Filippidis FT, Baldove JP, Majeed A and Rawaf S: Women in Saudi Arabia and the Prevalence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Systematic Review. J Environ Public Health 2016; 7479357.
- Holick MF: The vitamin D deficiency pandemic: Approaches for diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2017; 18(2): 153-65.
- Chen S, Sun Y and Agrawal DK: Vitamin D deficiency and essential hypertension. J Am Soc Hy 2015; 9(11): 885-901.
- Al-Raddadi R, Bahijri S, Borai A and AlRaddadi Z: Prevalence of lifestyle practices that might affect bone health in relation to vitamin D status among female Saudi adolescents. Nutrition 2018; 45: 108-13.
- Al-Daghri NM, Ansari MGA and Sabico S: Efficacy of different modes of vitamin D supplementation strategies in Saudi adolescents. J Steroid Bio Mol Biol 2018; 180: 23-28.
- AlBishi LA, Prabahar K and Albalawi YM: Knowledge, attitude and practice of health care practitioners in Saudi Arabia, with regard to prevention of vitamin D deficiency in infancy. Saudi Med J. 2018; 39(6): 603-08.
How to cite this article:
Alshammari KF, Hassan AOA, Alkhateeb AA, Altamimi AD, AlShammari AK, Alharbi MA, Almarshedy SM and Ahmed HG: Assessment of the awareness levels towards vitamin D check, medication and related disorders. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2020; 11(6): 2990-95. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(6).2990-95.
All © 2013 are reserved by the International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
55
2990-2995
745
585
English
IJPSR
K. F. Alshammari *, A. O. A. Hassan, A. A. Alkhateeb, A. D. Altamimi, A. K. AlShammari, M. S. Alharbi, S. M. Almarshedy and H. G. Ahmed
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Kf.alshammari@uoh.edu.sa
12 April 2020
25 May 2020
29 May 2020
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(6).2990-95
01 June 2020