BIOTECHNOLOGICAL DESIGN TO OPTIMIZE THE PRODUCTION OF BIOACTIVE LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM BY-PRODUCTS: NOVEL CHRONIC WOUND TREATMENT
HTML Full TextBIOTECHNOLOGICAL DESIGN TO OPTIMIZE THE PRODUCTION OF BIOACTIVE LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM BY-PRODUCTS: NOVEL CHRONIC WOUND TREATMENT
S. Lindon 1, M. E. Cruz 1, M. E. Sesto Cabral 1, S. N. González 2, J. C. Valdéz 3 and A. N. Ramos *1
Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology (LEFyBiFa) 1. Institute of Pharmaceutical and Food Biotechnology (INBIOFAL). CONICET-UNT. San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentine
Reference Center for Lactobacilli 2 CERELA-CONICET, Argentina
Chair of Immunology 3 Institute of Microbiology. FBQF-UNT, Argentina
ABSTRACT: Lactobacillus plantarum culture supernatants (LAPS) have antimicrobial, pro‐healing and anesthetic properties, so our medical team applied whole cultures and LAPS in chronic wounds with encouraging results. Metabolites responsible for LAPS properties and its action mechanism were previously determined. Objective: to design methods and culture media to increase the production of LAPS metabolites and optimize it´s therapeutic effectiveness. Modifications in MRS broth composition were made and L. plantarum was cultivated in the resulting different media with different physicochemical conditions to obtain modified supernatants (LAPSm). Antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activity (crystal violet) of LAPSm on strains typically isolated from chronic wounds (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Serratiamarcescens), was tested. Concentration of barbiturates in LAPSm was quantified by GCMS and its relative anesthetic potency in healthy volunteers was evaluated. DNAase and auto inducers type 2biological activity in LAPSm were quantified. In addition, a safety assessment of LAPSm application on healthy skin of 200 volunteers was performed. LAPSm obtained from media with high concentrations of yeast extract possessed the greatest anesthetic power. Those containing greater amount of proteins, cations and surfactants had the highest capacity of biofilm disruption (p<0.01). When glucose and galactose concentration were increased in media, LAPSm had the greatest antimicrobial power (p<0.05). Finally, there is great safety in the application of LAPSm as no edema or erythema was observed. The results obtained will allow the manufacture of LAPSm with greater therapeutic effectiveness and even custom properties for each type of wound
Keywords: |
Chronic wounds,
Pharmaceutical biotechnology, Lactobacillus plantarum
INTRODUCTION: In recent years, our working group has developed a treatment for chronic wounds based on the application of Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 10241 culture supernatants (LAPS). LAPS inhibit in vitro adhesion, growth, quorum sensing signals and virulence factors of bacteria typically isolated from chronic wounds 1-3.
LAPS are neither cytotoxic nor an inductor of necrosis-apoptosis in PMNs (ex vivo) (key cells in a chronic wound) or inflammatory response (in vivo pre-clinical trials), compared to acetic acid or antiseptics typically used in the treatment of these infections 4. Topical applications of LAPS on human infected chronic wounds (diabetic foot ulcers, burns and venous ulcers) reduces or eliminates the pathogenic bacteria load, the amount of necrotic tissue and the wound area. Also promotes angiogenesis, revascularization, debridement, the appearance of granulation tissue and wound healing with increased production of TGF-β, IL-8 and IL-8-R 5-7.
Chemical and enzymatic composition of LAPS was determined allowing us to propose a correlation between the chemical constituents and their biological activity 7, 8. The metabolites responsible for the anti-pathogenic and pro-healing properties act synergistically, which positions the complex mixture of LAPS as a single active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) 9, 10. However, the need for personalized treatments to suit different types of chronic wounds led to devise and develop this study. Besides, it is necessary to advance the field of alternative treatments that are financially accessible to the least economically developed countries 11. Based on this, the aim of this work was to design methods and culture media to increase the production of LAPS metabolites and optimize it´s therapeutic effectiveness of the supernatants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
- Bacterial strains: For antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activity tests (inhibition and disruption) four pathogenic strains were used: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratiamarcescens, Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis (Clinical isolates from human chronic venous leg ulcers). Two strains were used for auto inducers type 2 (AI-2) bioassays: Vibrio harveyi BB120 (wild type strain) as a source of external AI-2, Vibrio harveyiBB170as a reporter strain, which specifically responds to AI-2 by producing bioluminescence. A strain of Lactobacillus plantarum (ATCC 10241) was used to obtain all supernatants.
- Modified culture media (M) design:
Thirty two culture media (M1 to M32) were prepared as shown in Table 1. Culture media design was based on changes in the deMan Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) broth through modifications in the carbon, nitrogen and boron source and by increasing ionic strength and surfactant power
- L. plantarum growth in modified media: Modified media (M1 to M32) were inoculated with an overnight culture (8 h) of L. plantarum in MRS (OD600≈ 0.655) (1 µL of inoculum per mL of fresh culture medium) and incubated for 12 h at 37°C (until stationary phase) under aerobic conditions (O2 20% and CO2 1%). In addition L. plantarum was grown in those media with changes in carbohydrate source (M10 to M16) under microaerophilic conditions (O2 5% and CO210%). Finally, the OD600 (spectrophotometer Shimadzu UV-1800 UV-Visible) and pH (pH meter Broadley James Corporation-USA) was measured. Each medium was evaluated in octuplicate (n=8) and the result was expressed as mean ± SD.
L. plantarum supernatants:
Bacteria-free supernatants, were recovered after centrifugation (8000 rpm, 15 min) and subsequent filtration through Millipore filters (pore: 0.22 μm).When MRS broth was utilized, previously reported LAPS was obtained 1-10 and used as control of concentration and original activity. When M1 to M32 were used as culture media LAPS1 to LAPS32 were obtained (Table 1).
Antimicrobial and anti-biofilmassays:
5.1Selected supernatants: For these assays the following supernatants obtained under aerobic conditions were selected: 1) Maximum concentration of sodium, potassium and magnesium salts (LAPS2, LAPS4 and LAPS6); 2) Maximum concentration of the surfactant Tween 80 (LAPS9); 3) Maximum concentration of glucose and galactose and mixed sugars (LAPS12, LAPS15 and LAPS16); 4) Maximum concentration of peptone, triptone, meat extract and mixed source of proteins (LAPS17, LAPS18, LAPS19 and LAPS22), 5) All concentrations of yeast extract (LAPS23 to LAPS26), 6) Supernatants with boric acid (LAPS28 and LAPS29). All selected supernatants complied with the requirement of having a pH greater than 4.2 which is the minimum allowed for application on skin 12. For the same reason, supernatants obtained under microaerophilic conditions were discarded.
5.2 Antimicrobial activity:
The pathogenic strains were grown for 12 h at 37ºC in LB (P. aeruginosa and S. marcesens) or BHI broth (S. aureus and S. epidermidis) and suspensions of OD600≈ 0.150 were prepared using fresh medium as diluent and blank.
In 96-well polystyrene microtiter plates (Costar Corning Inc. USA), 150 µL of each bacterial suspension were placed and respectively 50 µL (25%) of LAPS (control for original activity), gentamicin (8µg/mL) (antimicrobial positive control), LB or BHI (growth control), MRS (control for original medium components activity),Saline (dilution control), human recombinant DNAase 1mg/mL (control for biofilm inhibition and biofilm disruption) and selected LAPS (see section 5.1), were added. The plates were incubated for 24 h at 37°Cand growth curves were obtained by measuring the OD600 once per hour in a microplate reader (BioTek FLx800TBID). Each curve was performed by octuplicate and every point was expressed as mean.
5.3Biofilm inhibition:
The content of the wells of the above assay (see section 5.2) was discarded and the wells were washed three times with saline. The remaining attached biomass (biofilm) was stained during 15 min with 200 µL of crystal violet (0.1%). Cell-attached dye was solubilized with 200 µL of ethanol and the OD540 of the resulting solution was measured in a microplate reader. The measured OD is directly proportional to the biomass (biofilm) formed. The percentages of stimulation or inhibition were calculated using the biomass formed in presence of LB or BHI as 100%. Results were expressed as percentage mean ± SD (n=8).
5.3.1Autoinducer type 2 (AI-2) activity in LAPS27 to LAPS32. There is AI-2 activity in LAPS 7, 8 and probably this is the main reason for which L. plantarum supernatants have biofilm inhibitory capacity.AI-2 has been proposed to serve as a ‘universal’ signal for interspecies communication 13, 14 and chemically generally are furanosyl borate diester15, 16. For this reason we measured AI-2 activity in LAPS27 to LAPS32 (which were obtained in presence of different sources of boron) by using the V. harveyi BB170 bioassay. Because of the acidic nature of supernatants could inhibit AI-2 detection17, aliquots of them were neutralized with 8 M NaOH (NLAPS27 to NLAPS32).
Vibrio harveyi bioassay: This bioassay was conducted according to Bassler et al 18. V. harveyi BB170 was grown for 16 h in AB media and then diluted 5000 times in fresh AB media to obtain 105 CFU/mL. One mL of the mentioned L. plantarum supernatants tested for the presence of AI-2 (LAPS27 to LAPS32 and NLAPS27 to NLAPS32) were added to 9 mL of these cells, mixed and incubated at 30°C with agitation (140 rpm). Bioluminescence measurements were taken every 30 min with a Microplate reader (BioTek FLx800TBID) until4.5 h. A supernatant from a V. harveyi BB120 overnight culture was used as positive control and AB medium was used as negative control. Each experiment was performed in triplicates.
5.4 Biofilm disruption:
For each assay, five spherical glass beads (radius = 9 mm; weight = 5.4 g) were used. The total area of the beads was [5.(4.π.r2)] = 5086.8 mm2 and the total weight was approximately 27.0000 g. The beads and 20 mL of fresh media (LB or BHI, according to the strain) were placed respectively in separate glass flasks and autoclaved. Subsequently, each flask was inoculated with 200 µL of an overnight culture of each pathogenic strain and incubated at 37 °C for 16 h until mature biofilm formation on the bead´s surface. The supernatants were discarded and the beads washed thoroughly three times with sterile saline. The biofilm formed so far was considered the pre-disruption starting biomass (PDB).Then, 20 mL of a mixture (1:1) of fresh medium (LB or BHI) and selected supernatants (see section 5.1) were respectively added. Sterile saline was used as disruption negative control; MRS broth was used as control of the medium components effect and LAPS was used as original disrupting activity control.
The flasks were incubated at 37 °C for 6 h to allow disruption and the supernatants were discarded. Finally, the beads were washed, transferred to pre-weighed plastic containers, and dried at 60 °C to constant weight. Weighing was performed on analytical balance (sensitivity to 4 decimal points) and the weight of remaining biofilm was determined by the following weight difference: Remnant biomass = weight of beads with dry biomass – weight of beads.
Each experiment was performed in triplicates. The result was expressed as remnant biomass (µg) mean/ beads area (mm2) to simulate what happens in vivo in a chronic wound.
5.4.1DNAase activity in LAPS17 to LAPS26:
The biofilm disrupting capacity of LAPS is partly due to the presence of extracellular DNAase 8, 19. Because of this, we measure DNAase activity in those supernatants obtained in presence of various protein sources (LAPS17 to LAPS26) using LAPS as original DNAase activity control.
For the manufacture of a calibration curve, standard solutions of human recombinant DNAase (Sigma) were used in different concentrations: 1000 µg/mL; 500 µg/mL; 250 µg/mL; 125 µg/mL; 62.5 µg/mL; 31.25 µg/mL; 15.63 µg/mL; 1.95 µg/mL; 0.98 µg/mL. In petri dishes (diameter: 15 cm), 20 mL of DNAase agar (Britania, Buenos Aires, Argentina) was placed. Twenty microliters of DNAase standard solutions, LAPS and LAPS17 to LAPS26 were respectively placed in wells (Diameter: 5 mm) made in the agar (each sample was assessed in triplicate). Then, petri dishes were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C and the enzymatic activity halos were revealed with HCl(1M)and measured (mm) with a Veniercaliper.
By plotting the halos of DNAase activity versus DNAase concentration in standard solutions, the calibration curve was found mathematically by the method of least squares. The equation which best represents the dataset was y = 0.0027. e0.4629x where "x" is the halo of enzyme activity (mm) and "y" is DNAase concentration(µg/mL).
TABLE 1: CULTURE MEDIA AND SUPERNATANTS OBTAINED AFTER THE GROWTH OF L. PLANTARUM. PEPTONE (P), TRYPTONE (T), MEAT EXTRACT (ME), YEAST EXTRACT (YE), GLUCOSE (G), GALACTOSE (GA), SURFACTANT SOURCE(SS), TWEEN 80 (T80), DIPOTASSIUM PHOSPHATE (DP), SODIUMACETATE (SA), AMMONIUMCITRATE (AC), BORICACID (BA), SODIUMBORATE (SB).
Anesthetic properties of modified supernatants:
6.1 Quantification of 5,5-diethyl-barbituric acid (DEBA) in LAPS23 to LAPS26:
Previously it was discovered that the active principle potentially responsible for the anesthetic action of LAPS is DEBA and that yeast extract (YE) is a source of barbiturates precursors for L. plantarum 7, 8. For this reason, this molecule was quantified in the supernatants obtained in presence of different concentrations of yeast extract (LAPS23 to LAPS26).
6.1.1 Extraction:
Five hundred milliliters of LAPS and LAPS23 to LAPS26 were extracted three times with ethyl acetate (PA Sintorgan. Ind. Arg) (70:30 v/v). The organic phases were collected, dried with anhydrous Na2SO4 and filtered. The sample was concentrated in rotary evaporator. The dried pellet was dissolved in ethyl acetate (5 mL) and stored at 4 °C until analysis by GCMS.
6.1.2 Calibration curve:
Standard solutions of DEBA (Anedra, Ind. Arg) were prepared in ethyl acetate (909.0µg/mL; 303.0µg/mL; 101.0µg/mL; 33.6µg/mL; 11.2 µg/mL 3.7µg/mL) and stored at 4 °C until analysis by GCMS.
6.1.3 GCMS:
Concentrated samples obtained from supernatant extraction and DEBA standard solutions were studied by gas chromatography (Thermo Electron Model trace GC ultra) in tandem with mass spectrometry (Thermo Electron Model Polaris Q). Each sample was injected (1 µL) and separated into their individual components by gas chromatography (Injector 250°C mode split 1/10; Gas Carrier: He, constant flow: 1.0mL/min; Column DB-5 30 m x 0.25 mm; Initial temperature: 60°C 4 min, Temperature ramp: 60-300°C at 10°C/min; Final temperature: 300°C 2 min). The compound was identified by mass spectrometry (Mass analyzer: ion trap; Ionization type: electron impact at 70 eV; Method of acquisition: Full Scan: 50-500 a.m.u; Ionization time: 0.25 min). For identification the mass spectra library NIST MS Search 2.0 was used. The identification was based on a > 90% similarity between the unknown and reference spectrum. DEBA had a retention time of 15.30 minutes in all samples and standards. Absolute area of DEBA corresponding peaks in standard solutions and extracts were calculated by using the software Xcalibur Qual Browser 2.0. By plotting the absolute area versus DEBA concentration in standard solutions, the calibration curve was found mathematically by the method of least squares
The equation which best represents the dataset was (y= 6.10-5x -3.01) where "y" is DEBA concentration (µg/mL or mg/L) and "x" is absolute area from the corresponding peak of the gas chromatogram. Extrapolating the values of areas of the corresponding peaks in the unknown samples (extract from supernatants), DEBA concentrations were calculated. Finally, by using the values of incubation times (12 h) and the volume of culture medium used (500 mL = 0.5 L), the production rates of DEBA(µ= mg/L.h) were calculated.
6.2 LAPS26 anesthesia evaluation on volunteer’ shealthy skin: Anesthetic property of the supernatant obtained in the presence of the maximum concentration of yeast extract was evaluated (LAPS26).The supernatant was tested on healthy volunteers (n=40 which gave informed consent) using the following methodology: Two milliliters of LAPS26 or a control solution of lidocaine (2% + epinefrin 1:200000) was applied to the left or right forearm respectively. Then waited 10 minutes and the sensitivity of both forearms was assessed by applying various stimuli: 1) Distention, 2) Pressure, 3) Non-penetrative needling, 4) Temperature. To describe patient´s sensation intensity in response of each stimulus, a verbal scale was used 20: 1) without sensation, 2) mild, 3) moderate, 4) intense.
- Safety evaluation of LAPS12, LAPS19, LAPS26 and LAPS29. Response to application on human healthy skin:
Since there is no foreseeable risk from the use of modified supernatants is possible to evaluate the safety of their ingredients simply evaluating the appearance of irritation and/or allergy in clinical test. The use of the corrosion test in a model of healthy skin 21 is a methodology validated by the National Drug and Medical Technology (Resolution Nº 288/90 ANMAT) in Argentina and in the Guide to Safety Assessment of the National Health Surveillance Agency in Brazil. This trial involved 200 healthy volunteers (with skin integrity in both forearms). The supernatant selection criterion was based on the concentrations of potentially irritating metabolites: LAPS, LAPS12 (maximum concentration of glucose), LAPS19 (mixture peptone-triptone), LAPS26 (maximum concentration of yeast extract), LAPS29 (maximum concentration of boric acid).To evaluate each selected supernatant, a panel of 40 volunteers (20 men and 20 women) was used. Each supernatant (2mL) was applied as a spray on the forearm of each volunteer (which gave informed consent)and the occurrence of edema and/or erythema at 20 minutes and 24 hours after application was evaluated. In addition, patients were surveyed about their skin sensations. The results were categorized as with or without sensation. In turn sensations were sub-categorized into: itching, burning, pain, numbness and redness.
- Ethical considerations:
This study meets the ethical and scientists standards to design, conduct, recording and reporting studies that involve the participation of human beings (stipulated by the Ministry of Health of Argentina, Resolution Nº 1490/07). They are based in the International Declarations of Human Rights and Ethics Research (Nuremberg, 1948), Helsinki (1964 and updates), the Operational Guidelines for Ethics Committees (WHO 2000 - World Health Organization) and the International Ethical Guidelines for Health research Involving Human Subjects (CIOMS 2002 - Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences).
- Statistics:
The t-test was used for statistical analysis. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
- L. plantarum growth in modified media:
In Fig. 1, the growth (OD600) of L. plantarum (12 h) in the different media (MRS and M1 to M32) can be observed. L. plantarum possesses a facultative hetero fermentative metabolism 22 therefore may behave differently under aerobic and microaerophilic conditions. In aerobic conditions (O2 20% and CO2 1%), increasing the ionic strength in the culture media (M1 to M6) did not substantially alter the growth of L. plantarum. In contrast, in the culture media with increased surfactant strength (M7 to M9) reduced growth was observed. Naturally, the addition of proteins and carbohydrates to the culture media (M10 to M26), increased the growth of L. plantarum, except with the addition of yeast extract (M23 to M26) as it did not produce significant changes compared to MRS. Besides, the lower pH observed for these cases are logical as amino acids, glucose and galactose can enter to the aerobic glycolytic pathway with production of acetic and pyruvic acid 23. Finally, the addition of boron as boric acid or its sodium salt to the media (M27 to M32) did not modify the growth of L. plantarum.
FIG. 1: GROWTH OF 12 HOURS OF L. PLANTARUM (OD600) IN MODIFIED CULTURE MEDIA UNDER AEROBIC AND MICROAEROPHILIC CONDITIONS. THE NUMERICAL VALUE BESIDE EACH BAR CORRESPONDS TO THE pH REACHED.
On the other hand, the growth in microaerophilic conditions (O2 5% and CO2 10%) were significantly higher (p<0.05) than those obtained under aerobic conditions while the pH of the respective supernatants were markedly lower. This is due to the large production of lactic acid from anaerobic glycolysis. The minimum allowable pH for pharmaceutical topical products is 4.2 12. For this reason all supernatants obtained in microaerophilic conditions were discarded for the remaining assays.
Chronic wounds 25, 26. The modified media were designed to maximize production of antimicrobial molecules present in the original LAPS as organic acids (acetic, pyruvic, lactic, etc.), hydrogen peroxide, ethanol, benzoic acid, 5-methyl hydantoin, 2,5-mevalonolactone, isobutyl piperazinedione and others 8. Therefore, this assay allowed us to identify the supernatants that retain or increase the bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity present in the original LAPS 2, 3, 7.
Fig. 2 and 3 shows respectively the supernatants antimicrobial activity on gram negative and gram positive bacteria. MRS stimulated the growth of S. marcescens, S. aureus and S. epidermidis compared to the control LB or BHI (Fig. 2B, 3A and 3B), whereas inhibit the growth of P. aeruginosa(Fig. 2A). Gentamicin had bacteriostatic activity on S. marcescens and S. epidermidis and bactericidal against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus (Fig. 2 and 3). Saline and DNAase produced growth curves similar to the control (LB or BHI), which shows that dilution of the medium does not significantly affect the growth of the tested bacteria (Fig. 2 and 3). LAPS and the majority of modified supernatants showed at least a bacteriostatic effect on all tested strains.
However, all strains were adapted to the hostile environment generated by LAPS19, LAPS28and LAPS29 and so resumed their growth between 10 and 20 hours of incubation (Fig.2 and 3). In addition, the gram positive bacteria were adapted to LAPS16 (Fig.3A and 3B) and S. marcescens, S aureus and S. epidermidis were adapted to LAPS26. Apparently an overload of nutrients (such as the dual source of carbohydrates and proteins in LAPS16 and LAPS19 or the maximum concentration of yeast extract in LAPS26) can positively affect the bacteria, enabling to overcome the antimicrobial effect of the supernatants.
Furthermore, the presence of boric acid (as is the case of LAPS28 and LAPS29) somehow prevents the antimicrobial effect of these supernatants. One possible explanation is that LAPS28 and LAPS29 were significantly more alkaline than the rest of the supernatants (Fig.2).
FIG.2: GROWTH CURVES OF THE PATHOGENIC GRAM NEGATIVES BACTERIA P. AERUGINOSA (A) AND S. MARCESCENS (B) OBTAINED IN PRESENCE OF SELECTED MODIFIED SUPERNATANTS (SEE SECTION 5.1 MATERIALS AND METHODS). LB (GROWTH CONTROL), G (GENTAMICIN 8 µg/mL) (ANTIMICROBIAL POSITIVE CONTROL), MRS (CONTROL FOR ORIGINAL MEDIUM COMPONENTS ACTIVITY), LAPS (CONTROL FOR ORIGINAL ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY), S (SALINE) (DILUTION CONTROL).
FIG.3: GROWTH CURVES OF THE PATHOGENIC GRAM POSITIVES BACTERIA S. AUREUS (A) AND S. EPIDERMIDIS (B) OBTAINED IN PRESENCE OF SELECTED MODIFIED SUPERNATANTS (SEE SECTION 5.1 MATERIALS AND METHODS). BHI (GROWTH CONTROL), G (GENTAMICIN 8 µg/mL) (ANTIMICROBIAL POSITIVE CONTROL), MRS (CONTROL FOR ORIGINAL MEDIUM COMPONENTS ACTIVITY), LAPS (CONTROL FOR ORIGINAL ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY), S (SALINE) (DILUTION CONTROL).
- Supernatants biofilm inhibition activity:
Besides the presence of plank tonic bacteria, there is an increasing evidence to believe that biofilm formation in wounds is the best unifying explanation for the failure of wound healing 27. That is why one of the main properties sought in modified supernatants is the increase or preservation of biofilm inhibitory activity shown by the original LAPS 2, 3, 7. The percentages of inhibition and stimulation of biofilm formation produced by controls and modified supernatants are shown in Fig.4. Control with gentamicin showed biofilm inhibitory capacity secondary to its antimicrobial activity. MRS behaved antagonistically on gram positive and gram negative bacteria. Inhibited biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa and S. marcescens possibly by its content in the surfactant Tween 80 (Table 1) and stimulated biofilm formation of both staphylococci perhaps encouraged by the extra supply of nutrients (Fig.4). Saline solution stimulated significantly the biofilm formation of gram positive bacteria. This would be due the contribution of NaCl to the system since staphylococcal biofilm formation is stimulated under high osmolarity conditions 28.
FIG.4: EFFECT ON BIOFILM FORMATION OF PATHOGENIC BACTERIA IN PRESENCE OF SELECTED MODIFIED SUPERNATANTS (SEE SECTION 5.1 MATERIALS AND METHODS). G (GENTAMICIN 8 µg/mL) (ANTIMICROBIAL CONTROL), MRS (CONTROL FOR ORIGINAL MEDIUM COMPONENTS ACTIVITY), S (SALINE) (DILUTION CONTROL), DNASE (BIOFILM INHIBITION CONTROL), LAPS (CONTROL FOR ORIGINAL ANTI-BIOFILM ACTIVITY).
Biofilm matrix of the tested strains contains DNA from bacterial secretion (in vitro) and/or from lysed host cells (in vivo) 29-31. Because of this, it is logical observe biofilm inhibition in presence of DNAase solution. Is worth noting that gram positive were less affected by DNAase, then it follows that gram positive biofilm matrix contain less DNA than gram negatives (Fig. 4). All modified supernatants showed significant inhibitory activity on all strains biofilm. However, this inhibition was similar to that shown by the original supernatant (LAPS).
Fig. 5 shows the results of V. harveyi BB170 bioassay. When supernatants were used without neutralizing (LAPS, and LAPS27 to LAPS32), no significant difference was observed between samples and negative controls (AB or MRS). In contrast, neutralized supernatants (NLAPS, and NLAPS27 to NLAPS32) induced a significant production of luminescence (p<0.01 for NLAPS, NLAPS27, NLAPS28, NLAPS30, NLAPS31 and NLAPS32 and p<0.001 for NLAPS29) (Fig.5).
Therefore L. plantarum produces AI-2 and these molecules are present in their supernatants. Greater induction of luminescence produced in presence of NLAPS29 (maximum concentration of boric acid), indicate that the chemical structure of the AI-2 present in the supernatants is possibly the aforementioned furanosil borate diester 16. This is consistent with the fact that L. plantarum genome has the lux S gene (encoding the AI-2 synthase) (Gen Bank accession Nº NP_784522). Previously it was hypothesized that the molecule responsible for the inhibition of biofilm is AI-2 8. However, the supernatants obtained in the presence of boric acid (LAPS27 to LAPS29) do not show greater inhibitory activity than the original supernatant (LAPS) (Fig.4).
FIG.5: INDUCTION OF BIOLUMINESCENCE IN V. HARVEYI BB170 PRODUCED BY SUPERNATANTS OBTAINED IN PRESENCE OF DIFFERENT SOURCES OF BORON (LAPS27 TO LAPS32). AB (NEGATIVE CONTROL), BB120 (SUPERNATANT OF V. HARVEYI BB120 AS 100 % CONTROL), MRS (CONTROL OF CULTURE MEDIUM EFFECT).
- Supernatants biofilm disruption activity:
Chronic wounds infecting bacteria are generally present in biofilm form 32.Therefore pharmaceutical products with biofilm disrupting activity are extremely necessary for chronic wound treatment. It was demonstrated that the biofilm disruption showed by LAPS 7, 8 is due to synergism between surfactants (Tween 80, 1-mono-linolein, 1,2-di-palmitin and distearin) 8, 33, an extracellular DNAase 8, 19 and variations in the ionic strength (Na, K and Mg salts) 8, 34. This assay was designed to identify the supernatants that retain or increase the biofilm disrupting activity present in the original LAPS. The disrupting activity of controls and supernatants can be seen in Fig. 6.
FIG. 6: BIOFILM DISRUPTION OF PATHOGENIC BACTERIA IN PRESENCE OF SELECTED MODIFIED SUPERNATANTS (SEE SECTION 5.1 MATERIALS AND METHODS). PDB (PRE-DISRUPTION BIOMASS), G (GENTAMICIN 8 µg/mL) (ANTIMICROBIAL CONTROL), MRS (CONTROL FOR ORIGINAL MEDIUM COMPONENTS ACTIVITY), S (SALINE) (DILUTION CONTROL), DNAASE (CONTROL FOR BIOFILM DISRUPTION), LAPS (CONTROL FOR ORIGINAL BIOFILM DISRUPTING ACTIVITY). STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE WAS CALCULATED COMPARED TO THE RESPECTIVE PRE-DISRUPTION BIOMASS (PDB) (* p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001, **** p<0.0001).
PDB represent the pre-disruption biomass before treatment with controls and supernatants. Gentamicin and saline did not affect the biomass formed. Here it can be seen the well-known high resistance to antibiotics that have the biofilm bacteria. DNAase had some disruptive activity. MRS also had a significant biofilm disruption activity on gram negatives probably due to its content in Tween 80 although stimulated biofilm formation in gram positives. LAPS and all modified supernatants showed intense disrupting activity. As expected, the most active supernatant were those with modifications in ionic strength (LAPS2, LAPS4 and LAPS6) and surfactant power (LAPS9). Besides the maximum activity was observed withLAPS19 (double source of proteins peptone-triptone) (black arrow) followed byLAPS26 (maximum concentration of yeast extract).
On the other hand, the highest concentrations of DNAase were obtained in LAPS19 and LAPS26 (Table 2) which would explain the greater biofilm disrupting activity observed for these supernatants (Fig.6).
TABLE 2: DNASE CONCENTRATION IN SUPERNATANTS OBTAINED FROM CULTURE MEDIA WITH MODIFICATIONS IN THE PROTEIN SOURCE. S (SUPERNATANT), X (AVERAGE HALOS OF ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY), Y= DNASE CONCENTRATION (µg/mL) CALCULATED THROUGH CALIBRATION CURVE.
S | X (mm) | Y=0.0027.e0.4629X |
LAPS | 9,67 | 0,24 |
LAPS17 | 11,67 | 0,60 |
LAPS18 | 12,83 | 1,03 |
LAPS19 | 14,33 | 2,01 |
LAPS20 | 10,67 | 0,38 |
LAPS21 | 11,67 | 0,60 |
LAPS22 | 13,33 | 1,29 |
LAPS23 | 10,00 | 0,28 |
LAPS24 | 11,33 | 0,51 |
LAPS25 | 12,83 | 1,03 |
LAPS26 | 13,67 | 1,51 |
- Anesthetic properties:
Numerous studies show that pain is present in the majority of chronic wounds 20, 35, 36. Chronic wound-related pain constitutes a psychological stress or that triggers the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenalax is promoting the production of vasopressin and cortisol 37. Vasopressin is a potent vasoconstrictor compromising the delivery of oxygen and nutrients for wound healing. Cortisol reduces the immunoinflammatory response, suppresses cellular differentiation and proliferation, inhibits the regeneration of endothelial cells and delays collagen synthesis. In the presence of cortisol, T-cells become less responsive to the interleukin-1(IL-1) signalling for the production of growth factors that facilitate T-cell proliferation 38. Therefore, pain is one of the most important challenges that must be faced in wound care treatment 39. Because of this, the anesthetic capacity of LAPS26 was evaluated. The verbal scale allowed us to determine the sensations of volunteers in response to various stimuli (Fig. 7).
FIG.7: LAPS26 ANESTHETIC PROPERTIES TO VARIOUS SENSORY STIMULI. SENSATIONS IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS WERE ASSESSED THROUGH A VERBAL SCALE. PERCENTAGES REPRESENT THE AMOUNT OF VOLUNTEERS THAT REPORT EACH SENSATION
The results with LAPS26 were very similar to those obtained in presence of lidocaine (2% + epinefrin 1:200000). Between 97-100% of patients reported no sensation or mild sensation in response to distension or temperature stimuli. Besides, between 90-95% of patients reported mild or moderate sensation in response to pressure or non-penetrative needling stimuli. This means that LAPS26 (maximum concentration of yeast extract) have ananesthetic effects lightly inferior to lidocaine.
As previously described yeast extract (YE) (a main component of MRS broth) is a source of barbiturates precursors for L. plantarum 8.YEis a water-soluble extract from an autolysate of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. The final metabolite in S. cerevisiae pyrimidines metabolism is 5-methyl barbituric acid 40. We propose that the enzymatic machinery of L. plantarum produces methylations in 5 – methyl - barbituric acid transforming it into 5, 5-diethyl-barbituric acid (DEBA) (Fig. 8). In fact, there is a correlation between the concentration of yeast extract in the culture media and the amount of DEBA found in the respective supernatant as is shown in Table 3.
TABLE 3: AMOUNT 5,5-DIETHYL-BARBITURIC ACID (DEBA) PRODUCED BY L. PLANTARUM IN TERMS OF YEAST EXTRACT CONCENTRATION IN CULTURE MEDIUM. YE (YEAST EXTRACT CONCENTRATION IN THE CULTURE MEDIUM), AAA (AVERAGE ABSOLUTE AREA OF THE CORRESPONDING PEAKS IN THE GAS CHROMATOGRAM), Y (DEBA CONCENTRATION IN THE EXTRACT CALCULATED THROUGH CALIBRATION CURVE), SC (DEBA CONCENTRATION IN THE SUPERNATANT), µ (BARBITURATE PRODUCTION RATE).
Supernatant | YE (g/L) | X=AAA | Y = 6.10-5X -3.01 | SC (mg/L) | µ= (mg/L.h) |
Y (mg/L) | |||||
LAPS | 5 | 1995000 | 116,69 | 1,1669 | 0,0972 |
LAPS23 | 6 | 2000015 | 116,99 | 1,1699 | 0,0975 |
LAPS24 | 7 | 2050000 | 119,99 | 1,1999 | 0,1000 |
LAPS25 | 8 | 2085045 | 122,09 | 1,2209 | 0,1017 |
LAPS26 | 9 | 2172850 | 127,36 | 1,2736 | 0,1061 |
We propose that DEBA is responsible for the observed local anesthetic action as already described for other barbiturates 41. Furthermore, it is possible that the presence of DEBA in L. plantarum supernatants could be beneficial in chronic wounds treatment because some barbiturates can promote wound healing via enhancing collagenization 42.
FIG. 8: COMPARATIVE GRAPH BETWEEN THE REFERENCE MASS SPECTRUM (BOTTOM) AND THE UNKNOWN SPECTRUM (ABOVE). THERE IS A 91% SIMILARITY BETWEEN BOTH SPECTRA AND RETENTION TIMES (GAS CHROMATOGRAM) ARE VIRTUALLY IDENTICAL IN THESE RUNNING CONDITIONS. BESIDES, THE ARROW SHOWS THE MOLECULAR ION OF 184 PRESENT IN BOTH SPECTRA. THEREFORE, THE MOLECULE WAS IDENTIFIED AS 5,5-DIETHYL-2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-PYRIDINETRIONE (5,5-DIETHYL-BARBITURIC ACID).
- Safety evaluation:
There is great safety in the application of the supernatants because no edema or erythema was observed with the application of LAPS12, LAPS19 and LAPS26. However, one male volunteer reported itching after 20 minutes of applying LAPS12 and LAPS19possibly due to high concentrations of lactic acid. With the application of LAPS29, two female patients showed edema and/or erythema at 24 h of application and redness/itching sensation. This could probably due to the presence of boric acid in the supernatant and must be taking into account in the future during culture media design.
CONCLUSION: The results (Table 4) showed that supernatants can be obtained with enhanced properties. Therefore, this will allow in the future a LAPS manufacture with a greater therapeutic effectiveness and even custom properties for each type of wound.
TABLE 4: COMPARATIVE TABLE OF RESULTS THE SYMBOLS (↑), (↓) AND (=) REPRESENTS RESPECTIVELY A HIGHER, LOWER OR SIMILAR ACTIVITY COMPARED TO THE ORIGINAL SUPERNATANT (LAPS).
LAPS | pH | Antimicrobialaction | Biofilminhibition | Biofilmdisruption | AI-2 | DNAse | DEBA | |||||||||
Pa | Sm | Sa | Se | Pa | Sm | Sa | Se | Pa | Sm | Sa | Se | |||||
1 | ↓ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
2 | ↓ | = | ↑ | = | ↑ | = | = | = | = | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | - | - | - |
3 | ↓ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
4 | ↓ | = | ↑ | = | ↑ | = | = | = | = | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | - | - | - |
5 | ↓ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
6 | ↓ | = | ↑ | = | ↑ | = | = | = | = | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | - | - | - |
7 | ↓ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
8 | ↓ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
9 | ↓ | = | ↑ | = | ↑ | = | = | = | = | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | - | - | - |
10 | ↓ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
11 | ↓ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
12 | ↓ | = | ↑ | = | ↑ | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | - | - | - |
13 | ↓ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
14 | ↓ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
15 | ↓ | = | ↑ | = | ↑ | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | - | - | - |
16 | ↓ | = | ↑ | ↓ | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | - | - | - |
17 | ↓ | = | ↑ | = | ↑ | = | = | = | ↓ | = | = | = | = | - | ↑ | - |
18 | ↓ | = | ↑ | = | ↑ | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | - | ↑ | - |
19 | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | = | = | = | = | = | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | - | ↑ | - |
20 | ↓ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ↑ | - |
21 | ↓ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ↑ | - |
22 | ↓ | = | ↑ | = | ↑ | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | - | ↑ | - |
23 | ↓ | = | ↑ | = | ↑ | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | - | ↑ | ↑ |
24 | ↓ | = | ↑ | = | ↑ | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | - | ↑ | ↑ |
25 | ↓ | = | ↑ | = | ↑ | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | - | ↑ | ↑ |
26 | ↓ | = | = | ↓ | ↓ | = | = | = | = | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | - | ↑ | ↑ |
27 | ↑ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ↑ | - | - |
28 | ↑ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | ↑ | - | - |
29 | ↑ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | = | ↑ | - | - |
30 | ↑ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | = | - | - |
31 | ↑ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | = | - | - |
32 | ↑ | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | = | - | - |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT: This work was supported by Business Unit of National University of Tucumán and National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET). We want to thank to Dr. María José Rodríguez Vaquero for her invaluable collaboration
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
REFERENCES:
- Valdez J, Peral M, Rachid M, Santana M, Perdigon G. Interference of Lactobacillus plantarum on Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro and in infected burns. The potential use of probiotic in wound treatment. ClinMicrobiol Infect 2005; 11: 472-479.
- Ramos AN, Peral M, Valdez J. Differences between Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a clinical sample and in a colony isolated from it: Comparison of virulence capacity and susceptibility of biofilm to inhibitors. Comp Immunol Microbiol InfectDis2010a; 33(3): 267-275.
- Ramos AN, Sesto Cabral ME, Noseda D, Bosch A, Yantorno OM, Valdéz JC. Antipathogenic properties of Lactobacillus plantarum on Pseudomonas aeruginosa: the potential use of its supernatants in the treatment of infected chronic wounds. Wound Rep Reg 2012; 20: 552-562.
- Ramos A, Gobbato N, Rachid M, Gonzalez L, Yantorno O, Valdez J. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum and Pseudomonas aeruginosa culture supernatants on polymorph nuclear damage and inflammatory response. IntImmunopharmacol2010b; 10 (2): 247-251.
- Peral M, Huaman Martinez M, Valdez J. Bacteriotherapy with Lactobacillus plantarum in burns. Int Wound J 2009; 6: 73-81.
- Peral M, Rachid M, Gobbato N, Huaman Martinez M, Valdez J. Interleukin-8 production by polymorph nuclear leukocytes from patients with chronic infected leg ulcers treated with Lactobacillus plantarum. Clin Microbiol Infect2010; 16(3): 281-286.
- Valdez JC, Ramos AN, Fernández D, Rachid M, Sesto Cabral E, Valdecantos P, Olea L, Ortiz Mayor M. Probiotics and their potential use in wound treatment. Book: Probiotics: Immunobiotics and Immunogenics. Science Publishers/CRC.ISBN 978-1-48-220684-5.
- Ramos AN, Sesto Cabral ME, Arena ME; Arrighi CF, Arroyo Aguilar AA, Valdéz JC. Compounds from Lactobacillus plantarum culture supernatants with potential pro-healing and anti-pathogenic properties in skin chronic wounds. J Pharm Biol 2014; In press.
- Sesto Cabral ME, Ramos AN, Macedo AJ, Trentin DS, Treter J, Manzo RH, Valdez JC. Formulation and quality control of semi-solid containing harmless bacteria by-products: chronic wounds pro-healing activity. Pharm Dev Tech 2014; 8:1-8.
- Sesto Cabral ME, Ramos AN, Cabrera CA, Valdez JC, González SN. Equipment and method for in vitro release measurements on topical dosage forms. Pharm Dev Techn 2014; In press.
- Greer N, Foman NA, MacDonald R, Dorrian J, Fitzgerald P, Rutks I, Wilt TJ. Advanced wound care therapies for nonhealing diabetic, venous, and arterial ulcers. A systematic review. Annals Int Med 2013: 159(8): 532-542.
- Matousek JL, Campbell KL.(2002). A comparative review of cutaneous pH. Veterinary Dermatology2012; 13(6): 293-300.
- Surette M, Miller M, Bassler B. Quorum sensing in Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and Vibrio harveyi: A new family of genes responsible for autoinducer production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA1999; 96: 1639–1644.
- De Keersmaecker S, Sonck K, Vanderleyden J. Let Lux S speak up in AI-2 signaling. Trends in Microbiol2006; 14(3): 114-119.
- Schauder S, Shokat K, Surette M, Bassler B. The LuxS family of bacterial autoinducers: biosynthesis of a novel quorum-sensing signal molecule. MolMicrobiol1999; 41: 463–476.
- Chen X, Schauder S, Potier N, Van Dorsselaer A, Pelczer I, Bassler B, Hughson F. Structural identification of a bacterial quorum-sensing signal containing boron. Nature, 2002; 415: 545-549.
- De Keersmaecker S, Vanderleyden J. Constraints on detection of autoinducer-2 (AI-2) signalling molecules using Vibrio harveyi as a reporter. Microbiol2003; 149: 1953-56.
- Bassler B, Wright M, Silverman M. Multiple signalling systems controlling expression of luminescence in Vibrio harveyi sequence and function of genes encoding a second sensory pathway. MolMicrobiol1994; 13: 273-286.
- Caso J, Suarez J. Detection and analysis of extra and intracellular deoxyribonuclease activities in Lactobacillus plantarum. Lett Appl Microbial1997; 25:148-152.
- Woo K, Sibbald G, Fogh K, Glynn C, Krasner D, Leaper D, Österbrink J, Price P, Teot L. Assessment and management of persistent (chronic) and total wound pain. Int Wound J2008; 5(2): 205–215
- Pathan AK, Rahul T, Rukhsana AR. Formulation development and evaluation of silymarin gel for psoriasis treatment. J Inn Pharm BiolSci2014; 1(1): 21-26
- Kleerebezem M, Boekhorst J, van Kranenburg R, Molenaar D, Kuipers OP, Leer R, Tarchini R, Peters SA, Sandbrink HM, Fiers MW, Stiekema W, Lankhorst RM, Bron PA, Hoffer SM, Groot MN, Kerkhoven R, de Vries M, Ursing B, de Vos WM, Siezen RJ. Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum PNAS2003; 100: 1990-1995.
- Siezen RJ, van Hylckama Vlieg JE. Genomic diversity and versatility of Lactobacillus plantarum, a natural metabolic engineer.MicrobialCellFactories2011; 10: 1-13.
- James GA,Swogger E, Wolcott R, Secor P, Sestrich J, Costerton JW, Stewart PS. Biofilms in chronic wounds. Wound Rep Reg 2008; 16(1): 37-44.
- Rhoads DD, Wolcott RD, Sun Y, Dowd SD. Comparison of Culture and Molecular Identification of Bacteriain Chronic Wounds. Int J MolSci 2012; 13: 2535-2550.
- Melendez JH, Frankel YM, An AT, Williams L, Price LB, Wang NY, Lazarus GS, Zenilman JM. Real-time PCR assays compared to culture-based approaches for identification of aerobic bacteria in chronic wounds. Clin Microbiol Infect 2010; 16: 1762–1769
- Percival SL, Hill KE, Williams DW, Hooper SJ, Thomas DW, Costerton JW. A review of the scientific evidence for biofilms in wounds.WoundRepReg2012; 20(5): 647–657.
- Lim Y, Jana M, Luong TT, Lee CY. Control of glucose-and NaCl-induced biofilm formation by rbf in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol2004; 186(3): 722-729.
- Whitchurch CB, Tolker-Nielsen T, Ragas PC, Mattick JS. Extracellular DNA Required for Bacterial Biofilm Formation. Science 2002; 295(5559): 1487
- Allesen-Holm M, Barken KB, Yang L, Klausen M, Webb JS, Kjelleberg S, Molin S, Givskov M, Tolker-Nielsen T. A characterization of DNA release in Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultures and biofilms. Mol Microbiol2006; 59 (4): 1114–1128.
- Izano EA, Amarante MA, Kher WB, Kaplan JB. Differential Roles of Poly-N-Acetylglucosamine Surface Polysaccharide and Extracellular DNA in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis Appl Environ Microbiol2008; 74: 2 470-476
- Burmølle M, Thomsen TR, Fazli M, Dige I, Christensen L, Homøe P, Tvede M, Nyvad B, Tolker-Nielsen T, Givskov M, Moser C, Kirketerp-Møller K, Johansen HK, Høiby N, Jensen PØ, Sørensen SJ, Bjarnsholt T. Biofilms in chronic infections –a matter of opportunity-monospecies biofilms in multispecies infections. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2010; 59: 324–336.
- [Chen X, Stewart PS. Biofilm removal caused by chemical treatments. Water Res2000; 33(17): 4229–4233.
- Chen X, Stewart P. Role of electrostatic interactions in cohesion of bacterial biofilms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2002; 59: 718-720.
- White R. Pain assessment and management in patients with chronic wounds. Nurs Stand 2008; 22(32):62-68.
- Wilson AB. Quality of life and leg ulceration from the patient's perspective. British J Nurs2004; 13:17-20.
- Upton D, Solowiej K. Pain and stress as contributors to delayed wound healing. Wound Pract Res 2010; 18(3): 114-122
- Ebrecht M, Hextall J, Kirtley LG, Taylor A, Dyson M, Weinman J. Perceived stress and cortisol levels predict speed of wound healing in healthy male adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology2004; 29:798-809.
- Price P, Fogh K, Glynn C, Krasner DL, Osterbrink J, Sibbald RG. Managing painful chronic wounds: the wound pain Management Model. Int Wound J2007; 4(1): 4-15.
- Sievers A, Wolfenden R. The effective molarity of the substrate phosphoryl group in the transition state for yeast OMP decarboxylase.BioorgChem2005; 33(1): 45-52.
- Henn D, De Eugenio D. In: Drugs the Straight Facts. Chelsea House 2009: 21-29.
- Ajwee DM, Disi AM, Qunaibi EA, Taha MO. Ethosuximide and phenobarbital promote wound healing via enhancing collagenization. Chem Biol& Drug Design 2012; 79(1): 137-142
How to cite this article:
Lindon S, Cruz ME, Sesto Cabral ME, González SN, Valdéz JC and Ramos AN: Biotechnological Design to Optimize the Production of Bioactive Lactobacillus Plantarum by-Products: Novel Chronic Wound Treatment. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2016; 7(7): 2762-74.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.7(7).2762-74.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
5
2762-74
1006
1826
English
IJPSR
S. Lindon, M. E. Cruz, M. E. Sesto Cabral, S. N. González , J. C. Valdéz and A. N. Ramos *
Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology (LEFyBiFa). Institute of Pharmaceutical and Food Biotechnology (INBIOFAL). CONICET-UNT. San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentine
alnirave@gmail.com
24 April, 2015
13 May, 2016
29 May, 2016
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.7(7).2762-74
01 July 2016