CHEMICAL PROFILE OF THE ANTIBACTERIAL COMPONENT FROM LEPTOLYNGBYA SP. HNBGU 002 ISOLATED FROM A HOT SPRING OF GARHWAL HIMALAYA
HTML Full TextCHEMICAL PROFILE OF THE ANTIBACTERIAL COMPONENT FROM LEPTOLYNGBYA SP. HNBGU 002 ISOLATED FROM A HOT SPRING OF GARHWAL HIMALAYA
Sachin Tyagi and Rahul Kunwar Singh *
Cyano Biotech Lab, Department of Microbiology, H.N.B. Garhwal Central University, Srinagar Garhwal - 246174, Uttarakhand, India.
ABSTRACT: Cyanobacteria are a well-established source of antibacterial compounds. However, the hot spring cyanobacterial strains are not properly explored for the purpose. The study investigates the antibacterial potential of the thermophilic oscillatoriales isolated from a hot spring of Garhwal Himalaya. Out of 48 endo-metabolite pools, extracted from 16 thermophilic cyanobacterial strains, tested for antibacterial activity against the bacterial pathogens, the DEEL (diethyl-ether extract of Leptolyngbya sp. HNBGU 002) was found to be active against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 with the minimum inhibitory concentration of 2.0 mg ml-1 and was able to disrupt the cell membrane function of bacteria as evidenced by an increase in membrane conductivity. In addition, DEEL was also found to be active against MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and VRE (vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium) strains. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis revealed the hydrocarbons and phenolics as the major compounds present in the DEEL. Besides, a triazolo-pyrimidine (TP) derivative, 1; 7-methyl-6-nitro[1,2,4] triazolo[1,5-a] pyrimidin-5-ol, was also detected in the active fraction. The findings suggest that the antibacterial activity of DEEL may be attributed to the hydrocarbons, phenolics, the TP derivative (1), and their synergistic effects. To the best of our knowledge, being the first report on the occurrence of a TP derivative (1) from cyanobacterial sources, this is an interesting finding in view of pharmaceutical industries. The study suggests that the DEEL is a potential source of antibacterial metabolites and must be fractionated to characterize these compounds.
Keywords: |
Drug-resistance, Multidrug-resistant, Oscillatoriales, Thermophilic, Triazolo-pyrimidine
INTRODUCTION: Bacterial pathogens, particularly ESKAPE (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species) are causing a serious threat to the human population worldwide 1.
The rapid development of antimicrobial resistance in these pathogens is worsening the situation and leading to the generation of new superbugs like VRE (Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci) and MRSA (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus), included in the high-priority list of pathogens by World Health Organization 2.
On the other hand, the rate of development of new antimicrobial drugs is having a nearly static pace and thus tempting the scientists across the globe to screen various sources for finding the novel antimicrobial leads. Microbes have always been the source of new antimicrobial lead compounds since the beginning of the last century. About 60% of the antimicrobial compounds have been isolated from microbial sources itself during 1981-2014 3. However, more than 90% of world’s biodiversity is still to be tested for their bioactivity 4, 5. Nowadays, endophytes, actinobacteria and cyanobacteria are being considered as most potential sources of antimicrobial compounds 6, 7.
Cyanobacteria, also known as blue-green algae, a group of gram-negative, oxygenic photosynthetic bacteria, have emerged as a potential source for antibiotic compounds in the last three decades 8-11. However, majority of cyanobacterial strains studied for bioactivity belong to the order oscillatoriales and were isolated from marine habitats 12.
The natural cyanobacterial mats inhabiting thermal springs could be studied for its bioactivities and metabolite spectrum by few workers only in the current decade 13, 14. Cyanobacteria from hot water springs could be a good source of thermostable bioactive metabolites, as they have refined their metabolic spectrum according to requirements for thermal adaption during their long evolutionary journey 15.
However, the bioactivity of laboratory-grown unialgal thermophilic cyanobacterial strains is least explored especially from the Himalayan region. Garhwal Himalaya endows a number of hot water springs containing thick mats and bloom of a diversified and substantial population of thermophilic freshwater cyanobacteria 16. Therefore, the present investigation was carried out to determine the antibacterial activity of hot spring cyanobacterial strains isolated from Garhwal Himalaya against the multidrug-resistant clinical pathogens and chemical profiling of the antibacterial fraction by GC-MS analysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Collection of Cyanobacterial Sample: A total of sixty- eight cyanobacterial bloom and mat samples were collected in sterile polybags (HiMedia) from Taptkund hot spring, Badrinath (30°74’48” N and 79°49’18” E; elevation 3250 m) situated in Garhwal Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India in the month of April 2015. Samples were transported to the laboratory in sealed containers within 24 h and divided into three parts. A small portion of each sample was fixed in formalin immediately after reaching the laboratory.
The second portion was subjected to microscopy, and the third portion was processed for isolation of cyanobacteria.
Isolation and Cultivation of Cyanobacteria: The cyanobacterial bloom or mat samples were processed for isolation of cyanobacteria using standard microbiological techniques. The colonies were transferred alternatively in solid and liquid media for purification. The uni-algal isolates were cultivated in the 500 ml flasks containing 300 ml Castenholz-D medium and incubated in an incubator illuminated with fluorescent tubes (95 µmol photons m-2 s-1) under 14:10 h light: dark cycle at 50 ± 2 °C 17. All the chemicals used for the preparation of culture media were procured from HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd.
Identification of Cyanobacteria: The uni-algal isolates of cyanobacteria were identified on the basis of their morphological, morphometric features, and available literature 18, 19. Morphometric analysis was performed using a light microscope (Olympus CX 21i), fitted with camera (Magnus 15F0419) and Magnus pro (version 3.7) software. The selected cyanobacterial isolate was subjected to partial 16S rDNA sequence homology analysis for molecular identification. Partial 16S rDNA sequence of this cyanobacterium was submitted to NCBI GenBank.
Biomass Harvesting and Preparation of Extracts: Cyanobacterial biomass was harvested in the late stationary phase of their growth by centrifugation at 4500 rpm for 20 min. The harvested biomass was dried at 50 ± 2 °C, powdered and extracted by the freeze-thaw method using three different solvents viz ethanol, methanol, and diethyl ether. The extracts were evaporated to dryness, re-dissolved in 10% DMSO (Di-methyl-sulphoxide), maintaining the concentration of 100 mg.ml-1 and stored at 4 °C until further use. The extraction yield of different solvents was calculated using the formula:
Yield (%) = (W1 × 100) / W2
(Where, W1 is the weight of dry extract and W2 is the weight of dry biomass)
Bacterial Strains: Drug sensitive bacterial strains, S. aureus (Staphylococcus aureus) ATCC 25923 and E. coli (Escherichi coli) ATCC 25922 were obtained as gifts from Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, India. The multidrug-resistant bacterial strains, MRSA and VRE were obtained from Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali Government Medical Science and Research Institute, Srinagar Garhwal, Uttarakhand India, and characterized in the laboratory on the basis of standard biochemical tests as well as their antibiotic resistance profile (antibiogram) 20.
Antibacterial Assays: Total 48 different organic extracts obtained from 16 different thermophilic cyanobacterial isolates were tested for their antibacterial activity using agar well diffusion method 21. Briefly, the bacterial suspensions containing (~108 cfu.ml-1) were spread uniformly over the sterilized MHA (Mueller Hinton Agar) plates. The plates were dried for 30 min, and the wells of 08 mm diameter were made on the agar using agar borer. Test wells received 0.2 ml extracts, whereas the control wells received DMSO and chloramphenicol representing the negative and positive control, respectively. After addition of extracts in the well, the plates were first incubated at 4 °C for 4 h for the diffusion of extracts, followed by 20 h incubation at 37 ± 2 °C to observe the zones of bacterial growth inhibition.
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the cyanobacterial extract was determined using macro broth dilution method as per CLSI guidelines 22. The lowest concentration of the extract causing no visible growth was considered as MIC. The bacterial culture treated with MIC of the active extract was sub-cultured on fresh NA (Nutrient Agar) plates to observe the bacteriostatic/bactericidal nature of extract.
Effects of Crude Extract on Bacterial Membrane Conductivity: Membrane conductivity assay was carried out according to the method of Jiang et al., 23, with slight modifications. Briefly, the 03 ml MHB (Muller –Hinton Broth) containing 2% bacterial inoculums was mixed with MIC of the crude extract. The mixture was incubated at 37 ± 2 °C for 8 h, and the 0.5 ml aliquots were withdrawn from the mixture at the regular interval of 2 h. The cells were separated from the aliquots by centrifugation, and the supernatant was diluted 20 fold with PBS buffer (pH 7.4). The conductivity of the diluted samples was measured with a digital conductivity meter (EI-1504189). The bacterial culture treated with DMSO only was used as a control. Results were recorded and compared with the control.
GC-MS Analysis: The selected cyanobacterial extract with antibacterial activity, the diethyl-ether extract of Leptolyngbya sp. HNBGU 002 (DEEL), was subjected to analysis by the coupled GC-MS (Agilent mass-spectrometer USA, GC 7890B; MS 5977B MSD) instrument using the method of Abdel-Aal et al., 24 with slight modification. The GC-MS instrument was operated with the following conditions; DB-5 MS (5% phenyl methyl polysiloxane) column with 30 m × 250 μm × 0.25 μm dimensions, solvent delay- 3 min, the injection volume- 1.0 μl, carrier gas - helium with the pulsed split-less mode at 3 ml min-1. The total run time was 42.5 min, where the initial temperature was 60 °C with a rising rate of 8 °C min-1 and a maximum up to 280°C with a hold time of 10 min. The ion source temperature was set at 230 °C (maximum 250), and the quadruple temperature was set at 150 °C (maximum 200).
An inbuilt mass detector was used for the mass detection of the peaks. The detector was operated with the ionizing energy of 70 eV with the scanning range of 30-800 m/z values. The electron multiplier voltage (EM voltage) was maintained at 1065.7 with a gain factor of 1.00. Mass-Hunter / NIST17 software with a database library was used for the identification of the separated peaks.
Statistical Analysis: One-way ANOVA (Analysis of variance) followed by LSD (Least significant difference) was used for comparing the sizes of growth inhibition zone and the effects on bacterial membrane conductivity caused by different concentrations of the DEEL.
RESULTS: In the present study, a total of 68 cyanobacterial mat samples were collected from the hot water spring situated in Garhwal Himalaya. The temperature and pH of the hot water springs varied in the range of 52-68 °C and 6.2-6.8, respectively. Out of 68 fresh cyanobacterial mat samples collected, 26 different cyanobacterial morphotypes including 01 chroococcales, 01 pleurocapsales, 19 oscillatoriales, 03 nostocales, 02 stigonematales, could be observed through light microscopy. Out of 19 oscillatoriales, only 16 morphotypes could be isolated in unialgal forms, cultivated and maintained in the laboratory.
TABLE 1: MORPHOLOGICAL AND MORPHOMETRIC FEATURES OF CYANOBACTERIA ISOLATED FROM TAPTKUND HOTSPRING, BADRINATH, UTTARAKHAND
S.
no. |
Cyanobacterial strains | Characteristic feature observed through a light microscope | |||
Structure, arrangement and cellular organization | Length and width (average with standard error) | Sheath | Cell content | ||
1 | Leptolyngbya sp. HNBGU 002 | Unbranched, nearly straight, more or less parallel, end cell rounded, not capitates, not visible septa, not constricted | Filaments 1.88 ± 0.11 µm broad | Thin and diffluent | Mucilaginous and blue-green. |
2 | Leptolyngbya sp | Filament straight or slightly curved or bent, rigid, single and gregarious, not constricted at the cross walls and not granulated | Filament 3.11 ± 0.28 µm broad | Thick and colorless sheath observed | Pale blue-green |
3 | Lyngbya lutea | Gelatinous, leathery and coiled filament with rounded end cell, granulated cross walls | Filament 4.38 ± 0.32 µm broad | Thick and colourless sheath | Yellowish brown to olive-green |
4 | Lyngbya mesotricha | Unbranched filaments erect or more or less curved, not constricted at cross-walls, outer wall thick and ends not attenuated | Filaments 2.75±0.22 µm broad | Thin and colourless | Content pale blue green |
5 | Mastigocladus sp. | Branched filaments, irregular in shape and size, cell content homogeneous, constricted at cross walls ends not attenuated | Cells 2.36 ± 0.17 µm broad and 5.57 ± 0.26 µm long | Thick outer wall | Light blue green,irregular shape |
6 | Oscillatoria jasorvensis | Unbranched trichome, straight, somewhat bent at ends, not attenuated and without capitates, cross wall are not properly defined | Filaments 2.55 ± 0.34 µm broad | Not observed | Pale or yellowish blue green |
7 | Oscillatoria unigranulata | Unbranched, tenuous, straight or less curved, calyptras absent, not constricted at cross-wall, large granule at the centre of partition | Filaments 2.27 ± 0.21 µm broad | Not observed | Uniformly granular and blue green. |
8 | Oscillatoria limnetica | Unbranched filaments, straight, long, consisting of numerous cells, not attenuated and not capitates, apical cell straight and elongated | Cells 1.35 ± 0.21 µm broad and 3.16 ± 0.33 µm long | Without mucous sheath | Pale blue-green, with homogeneous content |
9 | Phormidium tenue | Unbranched filaments and straight at ends, elongated and rounded end cells | Cells 1.16 ± 0.17 µm broad and 2.63 ± 0.24 µm long | Wide, thin and diffluent sheath | Light blue green |
10 | Phormidium usterii | Unbranched trichome with intricately bent, thallus thick, mucilaginous, lacerated at margins, non-attenuated straight ends with broadly rounded ends | Filaments 3.14 ± 0.27µm broad | Sheath thin and diffluent | Content homogenous, blue green |
11 | Phormidium sp. 01 | Unbranched filaments, straight and densely entangled, calyptras absent commonly visible constriction and attenuated ends | Cells 1.83 ± 0.23 µm broad | Sheath thin | Green filaments |
12 | Phormidium sp. 02 | Unbranched filaments straight at ends, and densely entangled, calyptras absent, cross wall not commonly visible. | Cells 1.12 ± 0.18 µm broad and 2.56 ± 0.23 µm long | Present with the diffluent manner | Blue-green filaments
|
13 | Phormidium sp. 03 | Unbranched densely entangled filaments, moderate curved, distinctly constricted at the cross walls gradually towards ends | Filaments 2.54 ± 0.31 µm broad | Sheath thin and diffluent | Dark pale green cell content with |
14 | Phormidium sp. 04 | Unbranched solitary filaments, homogenous cell content | 1.77 ± 0.23 µm broad filament | Sheath diffluent | Bright blue green |
15 | Symploca parietina | Filaments fragile, tortuous, forming anastomosis, pale blue-green or yellowish, without calyptras, inconspicuous cross walls | Filaments are 2.81 ± 0.19 µm broad | Thin sheath observed | Trichomes pale yellowish green, |
16 | Symploca thermalis | Unbranched, constricted cross wall, end cell rounded, septate cell, divided by defined cross wall | Cells 1.25 ± 0.24 µm broad and 3.66 ± 0.29 µm long | Sheath very thin, sometimes slimy | Bright blue-green to blackish green |
FIG. 1: PHOTOMICROGRAPHS OF CYANOBACTERIAL MORPHOTYPES ISOLATED FROM TAPTKUND HOT SPRING, BADRINATH. a - Leptolyngbya sp. HNBU 002, b - Leptolyngbya sp., c - Lyngbya lutea, d - Lyngbya mesotricha, e -Mastigocladus sp, f - Oscillatoria jasorvensis, g - Oscillatoria unigranulata, h - Oscillatoria limnetica, i - Phormidium tenue j - Phormidium usterii, k - Phormidium sp. 01, l-Phormidium sp. 02, m - Phormidium sp. 03, n - Phormidium sp. 04, o - Symploca parietina, p - Symploca thermalis
Identification of Oscillatoriales: The present study characterized the sixteen thermophilic cyanobacterial isolates of order oscillatoriales on the basis of morphological and morphometric features Table 1. The photomicrographs of these isolates are given in Fig. 1. The selected cyano-bacterial isolates subjected to 16S rDNA sequence homology analysis was identified as Leptolyngbya sp. HNBGU 002 and is publically available through NAIMCC (National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms Culture Collection), India, under accession number NAIMCC-C-00335. The 16S rDNA sequence of the cyanobacterium is available at NCBI GenBank (Accession no MN817932). Fig. 2 shows the photograph of Leptolyngbya sp. HNBGU 002 is growing in natural habitat, and its phylogenetic tree prepared on the basis of the 16S rDNA sequence.
FIG. 2: MORPHOLOGY AND GENOLOGY OF LEPTOLYNGBYA SP. HNBGU 002; (a) Mat growing in the natural habitat, (b) photomicrograph of entangled mass, (c) photomicrograph of isolated filament, (d) Phylogenetic tree along with other selected Leptolyngbya strains based on partial 16S ribosomal DNA sequences. The accession number of the respective strains is given as prefix of their names. The 16S rDNA sequence of Gloeobacter violaceus PCC 7421 was used as an out-group. The evolutionary history was inferred using the UPGMA method. The sum of branch length is = 0.18591738. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (500 replicates) are shown next to the branches
Extraction of Endo-metabolites: The dried cyanobacterial biomass was extracted using three different organic solvents (methanol, ethanol, and diethyl ether).
The yield of extracts prepared with each solvent is given in Table 2. The maximum yield was obtained by methanol, whereas the minimum was with diethyl ether in all cases.
TABLE 2: YIELD OF CYANOBACTERIAL EXTRACTS PREPARED WITH DIFFERENT ORGANIC SOLVENTS
Cyanobacterial strains | Yield of Extracts* (mg/g of dry biomass) | ||||
Methanol extract | Ethanol extract | Diethyl-ether extract | |||
Leptolyngbya sp.HNBGU 002 | 40.59±0.171# | 24.54±0.227 | 11.38±0.303 | ||
Lyngbya kuetzingii | 25.58±0.721 | 26.73±0.329 | 8.52±0.100 | ||
Lyngbya lutea | 40.81±0.933 | 18.66±0.637 | 13.6±0.120 | ||
Lyngbya mesotricha | 24.86±0.840 | 25.00±0.703 | 14.3±0.192 | ||
Mastigocladus sp. | 44.99±0.458 | 26.92±0.395 | 11.5±0.330 | ||
Oscillatoria jasorvensis | 36.99±1.071 | 25.29±0.221 | 10.56±0.177 | ||
Oscillatoria unigranulata | 38.46±1.061 | 34.44±0.373 | 15.38±0.263 | ||
Oscillatoria limnetica | 57.5±0.871 | 21.00±0.200 | 12.21±0.125 | ||
Phormidium tenue | 37.02±0.611 | 24.99±0.395 | 12.5±0.308 | ||
Phormidium usterii | 35.71±0.447 | 26.66±0.127 | 15.17±0.155 | ||
Phormidium sp. 01 | 41.39±0.594 | 24.16±0.536 | 11.66±0.437 | ||
Phormidium sp. 02 | 29.45±0.242 | 22.29±0.360 | 10.9±0.173 | ||
Phormidium sp. 03 | 27.85±0.898 | 26.36±0.178 | 9.28±0.223 | ||
Phormidium sp. 04 | 36.12±0.343 | 35.78±0.379 | 7.04±0.246 | ||
Symploca parietina | 39.18±0.985 | 21.05±0.399 | 11.42±0.246 | ||
Symploca thermalis | 39.4±0.676 | 24.44±0.452 | 11.11±0.110 | ||
#The values given represent the mean ± standard deviation (n=3)
TABLE 3: ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF CHLORAMPHENICOL (30 µg) AND CYANOBACTERIAL EXTRACTS (2.0 mg) AGAINST DRUG SENSITIVE CLINICAL PATHOGENS
S. no. | Name of drug/cyanobacterial extract (dose) | Sizes of Growth Inhibition zone (mm) against | ||
S. aureus ATCC 25923 | E. coli ATCC 25922 | |||
1 | Chloramphenicol (30 µg) | 22± 0.33# | 24± 0.33 | |
2 | Leptolyngbya sp. HNBGU 002 | Ethanol | ND* | ND |
Methanol | 15.2± 0.84 | ND | ||
Di-ethyl ether | 17.8 ± 0.58 | 14.2± 0.84 | ||
3 | Lyngbya kuetzingii | Ethanol | ND | ND |
Methanol | 9.6± 0.89 | ND | ||
Di-ethyl ether | 16± 0.71 | ND | ||
4 | Lyngbya lutea
|
Ethanol | ND | ND |
Methanol | ND | ND | ||
Di-ethyl ether | 15.4± 0.55 | ND | ||
5 | Lyngbya mesotricha
|
Ethanol | ND | ND |
Methanol | 12.4± 0.55 | ND | ||
Di-ethyl ether | 16.2± 0.84 | ND | ||
6 | Mastigocladus sp.
|
Ethanol | ND | ND |
Methanol | 12.2± 0.45 | ND | ||
Di-ethyl ether | 16.25± 0.50 | 9.8± 0.84 | ||
7 | Oscillatoria jasorvensis
|
Ethanol | ND | ND |
Methanol | 8.8± 0.84 | ND | ||
Di-ethyl ether | 16.5± 0.50 | 8.6± 0.55 | ||
8 | Oscillatoria unigranulata | Ethanol | ND | ND |
Methanol | 9.2± 1.09 | ND | ||
Di-ethyl ether | 14.6±0. 89 | ND | ||
9 | Oscillatoria limnetica | Ethanol | ND | ND |
Methanol | ND | ND | ||
Di-ethyl ether | ND | ND | ||
10 | Phormidium sp. 1 | Ethanol | ND | ND |
Methanol | ND | ND | ||
Di-ethyl ether | ND | ND | ||
11 | Phormidium sp. 2
|
Ethanol | ND | ND |
Methanol | 10± 0.71 | ND | ||
Di-ethyl ether | 14.8± 0.45 | ND | ||
12 | Phormidium sp. 3 | Ethanol | ND | ND |
Methanol | 15.2± 0.45 | ND | ||
Di-ethyl ether | 16.8± 0.45 | ND | ||
13 | Phormidium sp. 4 | Ethanol | ND | ND |
Methanol | 15.8± 0.45 | ND | ||
Di-ethyl ether | 14.6± 0.89 | ND | ||
14 | Phormidium tenue
|
Ethanol | ND | ND |
Methanol | 10.2±0.45 | ND | ||
Di-ethyl ether | ND | ND | ||
15 | Phormidium usterii | Ethanol | ND | ND |
Methanol | 12.6± 0.55 | ND | ||
Di-ethyl ether | 15± 0.71 | ND | ||
16 | Symploca parietina
|
Ethanol | ND | ND |
Methanol | 13.6± 0.55 | ND | ||
Diethyl ether | 12.25± 0.50 | 11.2± 0.50 | ||
17 | Symploca thermalis | Ethanol | ND | ND |
Methanol | ND | ND | ||
Diethyl ether | ND | ND |
#The values given represent the mean ± standard deviation (n=3), *ND= Not detected
Screening of Cyanobacterial Extracts for Antibacterial Activity: Table 3 shows sizes of bacterial growth inhibition zone caused by different cyanobacterial extracts against a gram positive and a gram negative pathogen. Out of the 48 extracts tested for their antibacterial activity, 12 extracts prepared with diethyl-ether (polarity 2.8) exhibited antibacterial activity against the antibiotic sensitive strain of gram-positive pathogen, S. aureus ATCC 25923, whereas four diethyl-ether extracts exhibited activity against antibiotic sensitive strain of gram negative pathogen, E. coli ATCC 25922 at the dose of 2.0 mg per well. Based on the size of bacterial growth inhibition zones, the most effective antibacterial activity was observed in DEEL against the gram-positive pathogen, S. aureus ATCC 25923.
Effects of DEEL on the Membrane Conductivity: Fig. 3 shows the changes in cell membrane conductivity of S. aureus ATCC 25923 treated with MIC of DEEL as compared to the untreated control. A significant increase in membrane conductivity as compared to control was observed after 2 h of exposure with the extract. After that, only a slight increase was observed in the conductivity values up to 8 h. However, the conductivity value of the treated culture was always higher than that of the control.
FIG. 3: EFFECT OF DEEL (DIETHYL-ETHER EXTRACT OF LEPTOLYNGBYA SP. HNBGU 002) AT THE DOSE OF 2.0 mg.ml-1 ON MEMBRANE CONDUCTIVITY OF S. AUREUS ATCC 25293. The values marked with the different letters are significantly different from each other (p<0.05)
TABLE 4: RESISTANCE PROFILE (ANTIBIOGRAM) OF MDR BACTERIAL STRAINS
S. no. | Standard antibiotics (µg) | Zone of inhibitions (mm) | |||
MRSA | VRE | ||||
1 | Cholramphenicol (C 30) | 20.33±0.47 # | 18.33±0.47 | ||
2 | Amikacin (AK 10) | 17.33±0.92 | 18.66±0.94 | ||
3 | Ciprofloxacin (CIP 05) | 14.33±0.47 | 12.33±0.47 | ||
4 | Gentamycin (GEN 10) | 12.33±0.47 | 12.33±0.47 | ||
5 | Cefotaxime (CX 30) | ND* | ND | ||
6 | Ceftriaxone (CTR 30) | ND | ND | ||
7 | Vancomycin (VA 30) | ND | ND | ||
8 | Cefuroxime (CFM 10) | ND | ND | ||
9 | Amoxicillin/Clavulanate (2:1) (AMC 30) | ND | ND | ||
10 | Teicoplanin (TEI 30) | ND | ND | ||
11 | Erythromycin (E 15) | ND | ND | ||
12 | Clindamycin (CD 02) | ND | ND | ||
13 | Co-trimaxazole (COT 25) | ND | ND | ||
14 | Tetracycline (TE 30) | ND | ND | ||
15 | Linezolid (LZ 30) | ND | ND |
#The values given represent the mean ± standard deviation (n=3),*ND= Not detected
Antibiogram of Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens: Table 4 shows the antibiogram of multidrug resistant (MDR) bacterial pathogens, namely methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant E. faecium (VRE) used in the study. The results indicate that these pathogens are resistant to most of the antibiotics commonly used in public health settings. The MRSA showed the sensitivity only to the chloramphenicol, which is bacteriostatic in nature.
Anti-MRSA and Anti-VRE activity of DEEL: Fig. 4 shows the sizes of growth inhibition zones caused by different concentrations of the DEEL and chloramphenicol (30 µg), against drug-resistant pathogens, MRSA and VRE. The results revealed the dose-dependent increase in the size of bacterial growth inhibition zones (p<0.05). The extract at the concentration of 2.5 mg exhibited the size of growth inhibition zones of 16.25 mm and 21.25 mm against MRSA and VRE, respectively.
The quantitative bioassay with the same extract revealed the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 2.5 mg ml-1 against both the multidrug resistant pathogens.
Further, the subculture of the pathogens treated with the extract at the concentration equivalent to MIC indicated the bactericidal nature of the extract Fig. 5.
FIG. 4: ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF CHLORAMPHENICOL (C30 = 30 µg) AND DIFFERENT
CONCENTRATION (D 2.0, D 2.5, D 3.0, D 3.5, D 4.0 = 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, AND 4.0 mg, RESPECTIVELY) OF THE DEEL. Error bars represent the standard deviation from the mean value (n=3). The values marked with the different letters are significantly different from each other (p<0.05)
FIG. 5: MIC DETERMINATION OF DEEL AGAINST MRSA AND VRE (a-macro broth dilution tubes, b- MRSA and c- VRE subculture plates)
Chemical Profile of the DEEL: Fig. 6 shows the GC-MS chromatogram of the selected cyano-bacterial extract, DEEL. The RT (retention time) of the peaks observed in the chromatogram, major compounds retrieved from NIST mass spectral library showing ≥90% similarity index with the peaks and their corresponding molecular weight are enlisted in Table 5. Some of them appear more than once, although their selection criteria stick to retention time and similarity index. Hydrocarbons, its halo derivatives, esters, phenolic compounds, and 1, 2, 4-Triazolo [1,5-a] pyrimidine derivatives are the major compounds observed.
FIG. 6: GC-MS CHROMATOGRAM OF DEEL
TABLE 5: COMPOUNDS IDENTIFIED IN GC-MS ANALYSIS OF DEEL
S.
no. |
Retention time (min) | Peak area
% |
Compounds | Similarity (%) | Molecular Weight (amu) |
1 | 3.75 | 0.02 | Ethylbenzene | 94 | 106.078 |
2 | 3.985 | 0.02 | o-Xylene | 94 | 106.078 |
3 | 12.667 | 0.09 | Dodecane | 95 | 170.203 |
4 | 14.504 | 0.18 | Tridecane | 97 | 184.219 |
5 | 15.813 | 0.05 | Dodecane, 2,6,10-trimethyl- | 91 | 212.25 |
6 | 16.249 | 0.3 | Tetradecane | 98 | 198.235 |
7 | 17.281 | 0.06 | Nonadecane, 9-methyl- | 91 | 282.329 |
8 | 17.868 | 0.1 | Pentadecane | 98 | 212.25 |
9 | 17.969 | 0.46 | 2,5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)- phenol | 91 | 206.167 |
10 | 17.969 | 0.17 | 2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol | 97 | 206.167 |
11 | 19.286 | 0.03 | Cetene | 96 | 224.25 |
12 | 19.378 | 0.06 | Hexadecane | 97 | 226.266 |
13 | 19.471 | 0.06 | 10-Methylnonadecane | 91 | 282.329 |
14 | 20.293 | 0.04 | Methoxyacetic acid, 2-tetradecyl ester | 91 | 286.251 |
15 | 20.813 | 0.21 | Heptadecane | 97 | 240.282 |
16 | 20.888 | 0.12 | Tetracosane | 90 | 338.391 |
17 | 21.383 | 0.23 | Dodecane, 4,6-dimethyl- | 92 | 198.235 |
18 | 23.531 | 0.31 | 7,9-Di-tert-butyl-1-oxaspiro(4,5)deca-6,9-diene-2,8-dione | 96 | 276.173 |
19 | 23.841 | 0.25 | 1-Eicosene | 90 | 280.313 |
20 | 24.353 | 0.41 | Eicosane | 90 | 282.329 |
21 | 24.621 | 0.3 | 1-Octadecene | 95 | 252.282 |
22 | 24.705 | 0.31 | Tritetracontane | 91 | 604.689 |
23 | 24.797 | 0.51 | Nonadecane | 92 | 268.313 |
24 | 25.284 | 0.3 | [1,2,4]Triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-5-ol, 7-methyl-6-nitro- | 90 | 195.039 |
25 | 25.687 | 0.53 | Nonahexacontanoic acid | 93 | 999.07 |
26 | 26.517 | 0.42 | 1-Nonadecene | 94 | 266.297 |
27 | 26.802 | 0.82 | Ethanol, 2-(octadecyloxy)- | 93 | 314.318 |
28 | 27.415 | 1.34 | Heneicosane | 92 | 296.344 |
29 | 27.616 | 0.66 | 1-Docosene | 95 | 308.344 |
30 | 28.002 | 0.79 | Tetrapentacontane, 1,54-dibromo- | 93 | 914.682 |
31 | 28.094 | 0.97 | Nonadecane, 1-chloro- | 93 | 302.274 |
32 | 29.042 | 1.1 | 1-Tetracosene | 95 | 336.376 |
33 | 29.218 | 2.6 | Docosane | 96 | 310.36 |
34 | 29.512 | 2.81 | Tricosane | 96 | 324.376 |
35 | 30.703 | 0.65 | 1-Hexacosene | 95 | 364.407 |
36 | 31.433 | 2.73 | Hexacosane | 96 | 366.423 |
37 | 32.347 | 1.37 | Octadecane, 1-iodo- | 95 | 380.194 |
DISCUSSION: Unlike the previous studies on bioactivity of natural cyanobacterial mat grown in hot water springs, the present investigation was carried out to test the antibacterial potential of hot spring cyanobacterial isolates grown in the laboratory in unialgal form. Thus, the present study offers an advantage of the reproducibility of the same metabolites by the test organism under defined cultivation conditions.
As far as the thermal springs of the Himalayan region is concerned, cyanobacterial diversity has been reported by few workers only 16. The present study revealed the dominance of oscillatoriales comprising mainly with strains of Leptolyngbya, Oscillatoria, and Phormidium genera in the unexplored Badrinath hot spring, situated at the elevation of 3250 m in western Himalaya, India. The members of oscillatoriales were identified on the basis of their characteristic morphological features such as uniseriate, cylindrical, isopolar, unbranched trichomes with undifferentiated cells 18, 25. Our results are in consonance with the recent study by Singh et al., 16 which reported the dominance of oscillatoriales in nine different hot water springs situated in Indian Himalayan region.
Oscillatoriales have been reported to produce about half of the known bioactive metabolites from the cyanobacterial origin 26. Among oscillatoriales, the most prolific producer strains of bioactive metabolites belong to the genera Lyngbya, Oscillatoria, Phormidium 8, 12. Present study also revealed the antibacterial activity in non-polar (diethyl-ether) extracts of 75% strains tested against the S. aureus. The diethyl-ether extracts of all the strains exhibited better inhibition activity in comparison to that of polar (ethanol and methanol) extracts. However, the extraction yields were lesser in the case of non-polar solvents as compared to the polar ones. A previous study conducted with hot water cyanobacterial mats from the natural conditions also revealed the highest antimicrobial potential of non-polar extracts as compared to polar extracts 13. Convincingly, diethyl-ether is an excellent solvent for the extraction of antimicrobial metabolites from the thermotolerant cyanobacterial species. Among the non-polar extracts, DEEL exhibited the most effective antibacterial activity. The results are in good agreement with the previous studies, which reported the antibacterial activity in non-polar extracts of hot spring Phormidium strains 13, 27.
Any chemical(s) have the specific mechanism of action which can be elucidated by its effects on the target site. The bacterial cell membrane is the most common target of antibacterial drugs. The present investigation exhibited that DEEL contributed to changes in the conductivity of S. aureus membrane which stabilized after 2 h of exposure with the extract. This indicates that the extract caused the slight leakage in the membrane and the intra-cellular fluid, particularly the charged particles, leaked out into the supernatant solution, which increased the conductivity of the membrane. The movement of charged particles ceased after sometime due to the equal concentration of charged particles inside and outside the cells 23. Similar observations were also made by Wu et al., 28 (2018), when they have treated the S. aureus with 4, 4-trisulfanediylbis. Thus, the DEEL extract must have a group of compounds that retarded the bacterial membrane functions.
The study also revealed that the DEEL has significant antibacterial activity against the drug resistant clinical pathogens, including the MRSA and VRE. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on antibacterial activity of diethyl-ether extract prepared with laboratory-grown biomass of unialgal thermophilic Leptolyngbya isolate against the drug-resistant clinical pathogens like MRSA and VRE. These two multi-drug resistant pathogens cause major public health threats across the world and imposed high morbidity and mortality rates 29. On the other side, the physicians are facing limited choices of currently available drugs, like bacteriostatic chloramphenicol, against the infections caused by these pathogens 30. The sizes of bacterial growth inhibition zone caused by the DEEL (2.5 mg) were observed to be comparable to that caused by chloramphenicol (30 µg). Luesch et al., 31 have shown that MIC of pure bioactive constituents lies around 0.25% as compared to that of the crude extract. Thus, the DEEL offers a new source for the discovery of urgently needed bactericidal medicines against the superbugs, MRSA and VRE, listed in the WHO’s priority list.
Further, DEEL was subjected to GC-MS analysis, a technique used for the identification of non-polar and volatile component of the crude extracts. This analysis revealed that the active extract has the versatile chemical profile, including the higher percentage (~30%) of hydrocarbons, their esters, and halogen derivatives followed by tris-butyl phenolics and other compounds. Similar to our findings, previous studies have also reported the hydrocarbons as principal volatile components in the non-polar extracts of cyanobacteria and algae having antibacterial activity 13, 32, 33. However, these major compounds (hydrocarbons) are also known for non-selective cytotoxicity, henceforth cannot be developed as antimicrobial drugs 34. The second major group of compounds observed in the extract was tert-butyl phenolics. The compounds belonging to this chemical class have been reported previously for their antibacterial, antioxidant, cytotoxicity and antifungal activity 35. A compound, 2, 5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl) phenol, found in our study has been recently reported from the non-polar extract of Streptomyces sp. PWS 52 having antibacterial activity against MRSA 36.
Besides, hydrocarbons and phenolics, a peak (RT 25.284), observed in the GC-MS spectrum of the DEEL, exhibited <75% similarity with all the hits in NIST 17 mass spectral library except a chemically synthesized compound, 1; 7-methyl-6-nitro [1, 2, 4]triazolo[1,5-a] pyrimidin-5-ol, at CAS number 056424-00-1, which shows 90% similarity with the test peak. The compound 1is a derivative of the parent compound, [1, 2, 4] triazolo[1,5-a] pyrimidine (TP) Fig. 7a. The derivatives of TP are being chemically synthesized in the laboratory since 1909 and are rarely isolated from nature 37. The only natural TP derivative, 2; essramycin Fig. 7b, has been isolated from a marine organism, Streptomyces sp. Merv 810238. Thus, this study first time reports any TP derivative from hot spring cyanobacterium.
FIG. 7: STRUCTURE OF (A) 1; 7-METHYL-6-NITRO[1,2,4] TRIAZOLO[1,5-A] PYRIMIDIN-5-OL) IDENTIFIED IN DEEL (B). 2; ESSRAMYCIN; (5-METHYL-2-PHENACYL-1H- [1,2,4] TRIAZOLO [1,5-A] PYRIMIDINE-7-ONE)
The chemically synthesized TP derivatives have shown various bioactivities as antibacterial, anti-fungal, antiparasitic, antiviral, antipyretic, anti-cancer, CDK inhibitors and metal chelating 37, 39. Recent study reported the antibacterial activity of TP derivatives against MRSA 40. Another TP derivative was found to be active against VRE by interfering with the cell wall biosynthesis 41. The 2; essramycin, of natural origin, also exhibited broad-spectrum antibacterial activity 38. However, chemically synthesized isotopes of compound 2 did not show any antibacterial activity 42, which indicates the significant difference in the bioactivity of chemically synthesized and natural isotopes of the same compound. Therefore, compound 1 needs to be isolated from the crude extract of the test organism and tested for its antibacterial activity. The present study enlisted the compounds represented by peaks having similarity index ≥90 to the already known compounds, available in the NIST 17 mass spectral library. These compounds represent ~10% of the complete metabolite spectrum of the tested extract, DEEL. Rest of the peaks (similarity index <90) were considered as unidentified compounds. Isolation and identification of these unidentified compounds may result in the discovery of new bioactive compounds.
CONCLUSION: The study concludes that the non-polar extract of Leptolyngbya sp. HNBGU 002 is a rich source of antibacterial compounds having activity against multidrug-resistant clinical pathogens, including MRSA and VRE.
The extract is having some compound(s) causing leakage in bacterial cell membranes. The antibacterial activity of the extract may be due to the individual or synergistic effects of the hydrocarbons, phenolics and the TP derivative, 1, present in the extract, DEEL. Compound 1, is being reported from cyanobacterial origin for the first time, which is an interesting finding in view of the industrial production of these pharmaceutically important compounds. Thus, the study provides a new source of antibacterial compounds that need to be purified, identified, and characterized.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Authors are grateful to Prof. Debabrata Sircar, Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India, for his help in GC-MS experimentation and analysis. Authors are thankful to the University Grants Commission, New Delhi, for financial support in the form of UGC Startup research grant and the fellowship. Authors are also thankful to Head, Department of Botany and Microbiology, HNB Garhwal University, India, for providing necessary facilities.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: Authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES:
- Mulani MS, Kamble EE, Kumkar SN, Tawre MS and Pardesi KR: Emerging strategies to combat ESKAPE pathogens in the era of antimicrobial resistance: a review. Front Microbiol 2019; 10: 539.
- Tacconelli E, Carrara E and Savoldi A: Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis 2018; 18: 318-27.
- Newman DJ and Cragg GM: Natural products as sources of new drugs from 1981 to 2014. J Nat Prod 2016; 79: 629-61.
- Harvey A: Strategies for discovering drugs from previously unexplored natural products. Drug Discov Today 2000; 5: 294-00.
- Rott E, Pentecost A and Mareš J: Introduction: Recent developments in cyanobacterial research with special reference to aquatic habitats, molecular ecology and phylogenetic taxonomy. Hydrobiologia 2018; 811(1): 1-6.
- Hug J, Bader C and Remškar M: Concepts and methods to access novel antibiotics from actinomycetes. Antibiotics 2018; 7: 44-90.
- Alrumman SA, Mostafa YS, Al-Qahtani STS, Sahlabji T and Taha TH: Antimicrobial activity and GC-MS analysis of bioactive constituents of thermophilic bacteria isolated from saudi hot springs. Arab J Sci Eng 2019; 44(1): 75-85.
- Patel A, Matsakas L, Rova U and Christakopoulos P: A perspective on biotechnological applications of thermophilic microalgae and cyanobacteria. Bioresour Technol. 2019; 278: 424-34.
- Singh RK, Tiwari SP, Rai AK and Mohapatra TM: Cyanobacteria: an emerging source for drug discovery. J Antibiotics 2011; 64: 401-12.
- Tyagi S, Singh P and Singh RK: Cyanobacteria: a new terminus for anti-infectious agents. In: Tripathi K (ed). Nova Science Publishers, Inc. New York 2018: 1050-18
- Raja R, Hemaiswarya S, Ganesan V and Carvalho IS: Recent developments in therapeutic applications of Cyanobacteria. Crit Rev Microbiol 2016; 42(3): 394-05.
- Demay J, Bernard C, Reinhardt A and Marie B: Natural products from cyanobacteria: Focus on beneficial activities. Mar Drugs 2019; 17: 1-49.
- Dobretsov S, Abed RMM and Al Maskari SMS: Cyanobacterial mats from hot springs produce antimicrobial compounds and quorum-sensing inhibitors under natural conditions. J Appl Phycol 2011; 23: 983-93.
- Selvarajan R, Sibanda T and Tekere M: Thermophilic bacterial communities inhabiting the microbial mats of “indifferent” and chalybeate (iron-rich) thermal springs: Diversity and biotechnological analysis. Microbiology open 2018; 7(2): e00560.
- Padfield D, Yvon-Durocher GGG and Buckling A: Rapid evolution of metabolic traits explains thermal adaptation in phytoplankton. Ecol Lett 2016; 19: 133-42.
- Singh Y, Gulati A, Singh DP and Khattar JIS: Cyano-bacterial community structure in hot water springs of Indian North-Western Himalayas: a morphological, mole-cular and ecological approach. Alga Res 2018; 29: 179-92.
- Castenholz RW: Isolation and cultivation of thermophilic cyanobacteria. In: The prokaryotes. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg 1981: 236-46
- Komárek J, Kaštovský J and Mareš J: Taxonomic classification of cyanoprokaryotes (cyanobacterial genera) 2014, using a polyphasic approach. Presl 2014; 86: 295-35
- Hauer T and Komárek J: CyanoDB.cz 2.0 - On-line database of cyanobacterial taxa. - Word-wide electronic publication, Univ. of South Bohemia & Inst. of Botany AS CR, 2018.http://www.cyanodb.cz.
- CLSI (Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute): Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. CLSI supplement M100. Wayne, PA, USA. 2018; 28: 1-96.
- Mishra PK, Singh RK, Gupta, A, Chaturvedi A, Pandey R, Tiwari SP and Mohapatra TM: Antibacterial activity of Andrographis paniculata (Burm. f.) Wall ex Nees leaves against clinical pathogens. J Pharm Res 2013; 7:459-462.
- CLSI: Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 26th CLSI supplement M100S. Wayne, PA, USA. 2016.
- Jiang X, Lv B and Wang Y: Bactericidal mechanisms and effector targets of TiO2 and Ag-TiO2 against Staphylococcus aureus. J of Med Micro 2017; 66: 440-46.
- Abdel-Aal EI, Haroon AM and Mofeed J: Successive solvent extraction and GC-MS analysis for the evaluation of the phytochemical constituents of the filamentous green alga Spirogyra longata. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research 2015; 41: 233-46.
- Martins MD and Branco LHZ: Potamolinea gen. nov. (Oscillatoriales, Cyanobacteria): a phylogenetically and ecologically coherent cyanobacterial genus. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 2016; 66: 3632-41.
- Mazard S, Penesyan A and Ostrowski M: Tiny microbes with a big impact: the role of cyanobacteria and their metabolites in shaping our future. Mar Drugs 2016; 14: 1-97.
- Giorgio A, Carraturo F, Aliberti F, De Bonis S, Libralato G, MorraM and Guida M: Characterization of micro-flora composition and antimicrobial activity of algal extracts from italian thermal muds. J Nat Sc Biol Med 2018; 9: 150-58.
- Wu T, Huang Y, Chen Y and Zhang M: Trisulfanediylbis (but-2-enoic acid) against Staphylococcus aureus. PLOS One 2018; 1-9.
- Gashaw M, Berhane M and Bekele S:Emergence of high drug resistant bacterial isolates from patients with health care associated infections at Jimma University medical center: a cross sectional study. Antimicrob Res Inf Control 2018; 7: 138.
- Kulkarni AP, Nagvekar VC and Veeraraghavan B: Current perspectives on treatment of gram-positive infections in india: what is the way forward? Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis 2019; 1-8.
- Luesch H, Pangilinan R and Yoshida WY: Pitipeptolides A and B, new cyclodepsipeptides from the marine cyanobacterium Lyngbya majuscula. J Nat Prod 2001; 64: 304-07.
- Ozdemir G, Horzum Z, Sukatar A and Karabay-Yavasoglu N: Antimicrobial activities of volatile components and various extracts of Dictyopteris membranacea and Cystoseira barbata from the coast of Izmir, Turkey. Pharm Biol. 2006; 44: 183-88.
- El Shafay SM, Ali SS and El-Sheekh MM: Antimicrobial activity of some seaweeds species from Red sea, against multidrug resistant bacteria. The Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research 2016; 42: 65-74.
- Cravedia J, Grobb K, Nygaardc UC and Alexanderc J: Bioaccumulation and toxicity of mineral oil hydrocarbons in rats - specificity of different subclasses of a broad mixture relevant for human dietary exposures. EFSA Supporting publication 2017; EN-1090.
- Nguyen TB Le, Delalande O and Rouaud I: Tert-Butylphenolic derivatives from Paenibacillus odorifer — a case of bioconversion. Molecules 2018; 23:1951.
- Das R, Romi W and Das R: Antimicrobial potentiality of actinobacteria isolated from two microbiologically unexplored forest ecosystems of Northeast India. BMC Microbiol 2018; 18: 71.
- Oukoloff K, Lucero B and Francisco KR: 1,2,4-Triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines in drug design. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2019; 165: 332-46.
- El-Gendy MMA, Shaaban M, Shaaban KA, El-Bondkly AM and Laatsch H: Essramycin: a first triazolopyrimidine antibiotic isolated from nature. The Journal of Antibiotics (Tokyo) 2008; 61(3): 149-157.
- Attanzio A, D’Agostino S, Busà R: Cytotoxic activity of organotin (iv) derivatives with triazolopyrimidine containing exocyclic oxygen atoms. Molecules 2020; 25(4): 859.
- Abd El-Aleam RH, George RF, Hassan GS and Abdel-Rahman HM: Synthesis of 1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine derivatives: Antimicrobial activity, DNA gyrase inhibition and molecular docking. Bioorg Chem 2019; 94: 103411.
- Wang H, Lee M and Peng Z: Synthesis and evaluation of 1,2,4-Triazolo[1,5- a ]pyrimidines as antibacterial agents against Enterococcus faecium. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2015; 58: 4194-4203.
- Wang H, Hesek D and Lee M: The natural product essramycin and three of its isomers are devoid of antibacterial activity. Journal of Natural Products 2016; 79: 1219-22.
How to cite this article:
Tyagi S and Singh RK: Chemical profile of the antibacterial component from leptolyngbya sp. HNBGU 002 isolated from a hot spring of Garhwal Himalaya. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2020; 11(10): 5225-38. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(10).5225-38.
All © 2013 are reserved by the International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
57
5225-5238
1053
503
English
IJPSR
S. Tyagi and R. K. Singh *
Cyano Biotech Lab, Department of Microbiology, H.N.B. Garhwal Central University, Srinagar Garhwal, Uttarakhand, India.
rksingh.hnb@gmail.com
27 March 2020
20 May 2020
21 July 2020
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(10).5225-38
01 October 2020