CLINICAL STUDY ON THE IMMUNOMODULATORY EFFECT OF NIDIGDHIKADILEHA ON PRANAVAHA SROTO DUSHTI W. S. R. UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTIONS IN CHILDREN
HTML Full TextCLINICAL STUDY ON THE IMMUNOMODULATORY EFFECT OF NIDIGDHIKADILEHA ON PRANAVAHA SROTO DUSHTI W. S. R. UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTIONS IN CHILDREN
Amandeep
Department of Kaumarbhritya-Balroga, National Institute of Ayurveda, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
ABSTRACT: Aim of study: A Randomized controlled trial was planned to evaluate the Clinical efficacy of Nidigdhikadileha an Ayurveda multi-dimensional herb preparation in children suffering from Recurrent Respiratory tract infection in children. Nidigdhikadileha contains Nidigdhika (Solanum Xanthocarpum), Pippali (Piper longum), Amrita (Tinospora cardifolia), and Nagar (Zingiber officinale). All these drugs have been described to have anti-tussive and antimicrobial properties. Material & methods: A total of 90 children, including male and female children, were studied for complaining of Recurrent Upper Respiratory Tract infections and were registered and divided into 3 groups (Group A, B, C). In group A, children were administered Nidigdhikadileha, dose180-200 mg/kg/dose twice a day for 2 months in children suffering from RURTI. In group B, honey drops were administered to 30 children at a dose of 1ml/kg/day, and in Group C there is also 30 patients were administered Sitopaladi churna at a dose 100 mg/kg/day. All the treated cases were assessed at each follow-up on the 14th day, 28th day, 42nd day, and 56th day, and post-follow-up was done after 1 month. The efficacy of drugs was assessed clinically and also based on investigations. Result: Signs and symptoms of Pranavaha srotodusti persisted maximum up to 28th day follow up and on 42ndday improvement in clinical signs and symptoms were found significant. Conclusion: In all cases, significant improvement was observed.
Keywords: Recurrent respiratory tract infections, Morbidity, Immune system, Children
INTRODUCTION: Upper respiratory tract infections are the major cause of childhood morbidity, limiting day-to-day activities and school absenteeism. Diseases like tonsillitis, cough, and cold account for the maximum respiratory tract morbidities. Studies document that, in developing countries, every child has five episodes of acute respiratory infections per year, accounting for 30%-50% of the total pediatric outpatient visits and 20%-30% of the pediatric admissions. Ayurveda states that in children, the Prana, Dosha, Dhatu, Bala, and Ojas are underdeveloped and therefore
they are the most vulnerable group in terms of illness. Therefore they should be supported externally to potentiate their immune system. Good immunity has a substantial role in sustaining the body and preventing various infections. Although available conventional management provides symptomatic relief, there is no conclusive evidence that they shorten the duration of symptoms. The use of antibiotics is also not empirical.
Therefore, it is the need of hour to find some alternative to provide relief in symptoms, potentiate the immune system to resist the infections, and minimize the use of antibiotics. Ayurveda classics explain the upper respiratory tract infections under Kasa, Shwasa, Pratishyaya, peenasa, Mukha Roga with a comprehensive approach to the treatment. Nidigdhikadileha is indicated for Kasa, Shwasa, Jwara and Peenasa. The present review provides evidence that the drug Nidighdhikadileha may be used as a potent drug to manage recurrent upper respiratory tract infections in children.
Aim and Objectives of Study:
- To evaluate the immunomodulatory effect of Nidigdhikadileha.
- To evaluate the effect of Nidigdhikadilehain on recurrent respiratory tract infections in children.
MATERIAL AND METHOD:
Study Type: Open-Label Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Selection of Cases: Total 101 participants presenting with morbidity features of Upper Respiratory Tract Infection were enrolled for this clinical trial and were equally divided into 3 groups, out of which 11 subjects were dropped out. A total of 90 patients completed the trial. Total 30 patients in each group completed the trial.
Source: Subjects attending the O. P. D and I. P. D. of Kaumarbhritya department of National Institute of Ayurveda, Jaipur, screened for this study.
Age Group: 6 to 12 years of either sex.
Drug Therapy:
Group A: Trial Drug (Nidigdhikadileha)
Group B: Control Drug (Honey drops)
Group C: Standard Treatment (Sitopaladi Churna)
Trial Drug: Nidigdhikadileha is mentioned in Chakradutta Jwara Chikitsha / 199.
TABLE 1 1-51: GROUPING OF PATIENTS AND DRUG INTERVENTION
Groups | Group A (Trial Drug) n=30 | Group B (Control Group) n=30 | Group C (Standard Control) n=30 |
Intervention | Nidigdhikadileha | Honey drops | Sitopaladi Churna |
Dose | 180-200 mg/kg/day | 1 drops/kg/day | 100 mg/kg/day |
Dose form | Avaleha | Liquid | Powder |
Route of administration | Oral | Oral | Oral |
Duration | 8 weeks | 8weeks | 8 weeks |
Administration | After breakfast
Morning-evening |
After breakfast
Morning-evening |
After breakfast
Morning-evening |
Follow-ups: Every 2 weeks (Day 14th, 28th, 42nd and 56th)
Post Treatment Follow-up: After four weeks
End Point: Clinically Safety and Efficacy
TABLE 2: COMPOSITION OF TRIAL DRUG NIDIGDHIKADILEHA 1-51
S. no. | Name of Drug | Latn Name | Part Used | Proportion |
1 | Nidigdhika | Solanum Xanthocarpum | Fruit | 1 Part |
2 | Nagar | Zingiber officinale | Rhizome | 1 Part |
3 | Amrita | Tinosporacardifolia | Stem | 1 Part |
4 | Pippali | Piper longum | Fruit | 1 Part |
Preparation of Trial Drug: The drug was prepared in the pharmacy of National Institute of Ayurveda Jaipur as Avaleha form mixed with madhu (honey) to enhance its palatability for easy administration in children.
Presentation of Drug:
Trial Drug: In the form of Avaleha packed in 50 gm tetra pack
Control Group: Honey Drops (packed in 15 ml vial)
Conventional Treatment: Sitopaladichurna in Powder form with honey (Charak Samhita Rajyakshama Chikitsa 8/103-104).
Criteria for Selection of Patients:
Inclusion Criteria: Children aged between 06 to 12 years of either sex.
Children with recurrent upper respiratory infections. Children whose parents are willing to give consent for a clinical trial.
Exclusion Criteria: Children suffering from major systemic illness necessitating hospitalization were excluded. Children with evidence of malignancy, genetic or congenital anomaly, and chronic illness like TB, UTI, and bleeding disorders. Children with concurrent serious hepatic dysfunction (defined as AST and/or ALT>3 times of the upper normal limit) or renal dysfunction (defined as S. creatinine>1.2mg/dl) uncontrolled pulmonary dysfunction (asthmatic and COPD patients). Chronic illnesses like TB, UTI and bleeding disorders etc. H/o hypersensitivity to any of the trial drug or their ingredients.
Withdrawal Criteria: The participant withdrew from the trial under the following condition:
- Parents are not willing to continue.
- Any major ailment necessitates the institution of new modalities of treatment.
- Non-compliance with the treatment regimen (minimum 80% compliance is essential to continue the study).
- Any adverse effect of drug during trial.
Assessment Criteria: Assessment was done before, during, and after treatment.
Subjective Assessment: This included various manifestations of upper respiratory tract infections based on clinical features of morbidity like Nasal Obstruction, Running Nose and Wheezing, Fever, etc., according to modern and Ayurveda assessment criteria. Grading on a four-point scale Morbidity score was calculated as-
Morbidity Score = Incidence in last Two months × severity
Laboratory Investigations: CBC, ESR, IgG, TEC
Outcome Measures:
Primary Outcome Measures: Change in Morbidity Score.
Secondary Outcome Measures: Decrease in episodes of Upper respiratory tract infections and improvement in quality of life of children.
Ethical Clearance: Ethical clearance of the present trial was obtained from Institutional Ethics Committee after deliberation on 8th& 9th May 2019 with Reference No. IEC/ACA/2019/1-14, National Institute of Ayurveda, Jaipur.
Clinical Trial Registry of India Registration: Before starting the clinical trial, the present trial was applied for registration in CTRI with reference number REF/2020/07/035310 and CTRI with Registration No CTRI/2020/08/027386.
Data Documentation and Analysis: Observations were documented during the study, analyzed and evaluated findings using statistical methods (student's t-test) to establish the efficacy.
- For correlation: Chi-square test
- For comparison: Kruskal Wallis Test
- For Objective parameter- Students' t-Test
- For Intergroup comparisons- One Way ANOVA Test, Two-way ANOVA Test, Wilcoxon Test
- For Intragroup Comparisons- Paired sample t-Test.
OBSERVATION & RESULTS
TABLE 3: BASIC DETAILS OF THREE GROUPS
Basic Details | Mean ± SD || Median (IQR) || Min-Max || Frequency (%) |
Group | |
A | 30 (33.3%) |
B | 30 (33.3%) |
C | 30 (33.3%) |
Age (Years) | 8.27 ± 1.88 || 8.00 (7.00-10.00) || 6.00 - 12.00 |
Gender | |
Male | 53 (58.9%) |
Female | 37 (41.1%) |
Religion | |
Hindu | 70 (77.8%) |
Muslim | 20 (22.2%) |
Socio-Economic Status | |
Upper | 2 (2.2%) |
Upper Middle | 16 (17.8%) |
Middle | 34 (37.8%) |
Lower Middle | 35 (38.9%) |
Lower | 3 (3.3%) |
Residence | |
Urban | 83 (92.2%) |
Rural | 7 (7.8%) |
Family Status | |
Nuclear | 71 (78.9%) |
Joint | 19 (21.1%) |
Birth Weight (Kg) | 2.73 ± 0.26 || 2.60 (2.50-3.00) || 2.20 - 3.25 |
Age of Weaning | |
Before 6 Months | 14 (15.6%) |
6 Months | 58 (64.4%) |
After 6 Months | 18 (20.0%) |
Mode of Feeding At Birth | |
Breast Feeding | 70 (77.8%) |
Top Feeding | 20 (22.2%) |
Immunization History | |
Complete | 82 (91.1%) |
Incomplete | 8 (8.9%) |
Present Appetite | |
Good | 38 (42.2%) |
Average | 33 (36.7%) |
Poor | 17 (18.9%) |
Excessive | 2 (2.2%) |
Present Pattern Of Diet | |
Vegetarian | 57 (63.3%) |
Mixed | 33 (36.7%) |
Status Of Agni | |
Samagni | 65 (72.2%) |
Mandagni | 22 (24.4%) |
Tikshnagni | 2 (2.2%) |
Vishamagni | 1 (1.1%) |
Sleep | |
Sound | 79 (87.8%) |
Excessive | 10 (11.1%) |
Disturbed | 1 (1.1%) |
Associated Complaints | |
None | 47 (52.2%) |
Snoring | 26 (28.9%) |
Conjuctivitis | 6 (6.7%) |
Otitis Media | 6 (6.7%) |
Tonsilitis | 5 (5.6%) |
H/O Deworming (Yes) | 42 (46.7%) |
Prakriti | |
V-K | 59 (65.6%) |
V-P | 19 (21.1%) |
P-K | 12 (13.3%) |
TABLE 4: CHANGES IN MORBIDITY SCORE TIME POINT COMPARISON OF THREE GROUPS
Timepoint Comparison | Change in Morbidity Score from Before Treatment to Follow-up Timepoints | P-Value for Comparison of the three Groups in Terms of Difference of Morbidity Score from Before Treatment to Follow-up Timepoints | |||||
Group: A | Group: B | Group: C | |||||
Mean (SD) of Absolute Change | P-Value of Change Within Group | Mean (SD) of Absolute Change | P-Value of Change Within Group | Mean (SD) of Absolute Change | P-Value of Change Within Group | ||
Nasal Obstruction After Treatment - Before Treatment | -4.40 (2.33) | <0.001 | 0.33 (1.84) | 0.679 | -4.43 (2.28) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Nasal Obstruction Post Follow-Up - Before Treatment | -4.17 (2.23) | <0.001 | 0.27 (2.30) | 0.758 | -0.80 (3.07) | 0.400 | <0.001 |
Running Nose After Treatment - Before Treatment | -4.13 (2.26) | <0.001 | -0.73 (2.45) | 0.400 | -4.27 (2.00) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Running Nose Post Follow-Up - Before Treatment | -3.93 (2.32) | <0.001 | -1.40 (2.11) | 0.045 | -3.73 (2.15) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Wheezing After Treatment - Before Treatment | -2.47 (2.29) | <0.001 | 0.43 (1.57) | 0.719 | -2.63 (2.22) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Wheezing Post Follow-Up - Before Treatment | -2.17 (2.38) | <0.001 | 0.47 (1.57) | 0.597 | -2.90 (2.29) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
DysponeaAfter Treatment - Before Treatment | -1.67 (0.92) | <0.001 | 0.10 (0.61) | 0.894 | -1.23 (1.14) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
DysponeaPost Follow-Up - Before Treatment | -1.73 (0.87) | <0.001 | 0.07 (0.69) | 0.863 | -0.57 (1.04) | 0.167 | <0.001 |
Cough After Treatment - Before Treatment | -3.37 (2.24) | <0.001 | 0.07 (0.37) | 0.980 | -3.47 (2.10) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Cough Post Follow-Up - Before Treatment | -3.37 (2.28) | <0.001 | -0.17 (1.44) | 1.000 | -3.37 (2.22) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Fever After Treatment - Before Treatment | -1.47 (2.08) | 0.008 | 0.07 (0.37) | 0.980 | -1.83 (2.78) | 0.062 | <0.001 |
Fever Post Follow-Up - Before Treatment | -1.33 (2.11) | 0.038 | 0.07 (1.62) | 0.921 | -3.30 (2.73) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
TABLE 5: COMPARISON OF THE THREE GROUPS IN TERMS OF CHANGE IN T. E. C AND IGG OVER TIME (N = 90)
TEC | Group | P-value for comparison of the three groups at each of the time points (Kruskal Wallis Test) | ||
A | B | C | ||
Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | ||
Before Treatment | 0.28 (0.16) | 0.27 (0.17) | 0.30 (0.18) | 0.817 |
After Treatment | 0.24 (0.14) | 0.30 (0.18) | 0.29 (0.18) | 0.222 |
P Value for change in T.E.C over time within each group (Wilcoxon Test) | <0.001 | 0.048 | 0.098 | |
Overall P-Value for comparison of the change in TEC over time between the three groups (Generalized Estimating Equations) | <0.001 | |||
IgG | Group | P-value for comparison of the three groups at each of the time points (Kruskal Wallis Test) | ||
A | B | C | ||
Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | ||
Before Treatment | 1061.67 (157.73) | 1069.13 (141.61) | 1041.20 (162.79) | 0.777 |
After Treatment | 1114.33 (156.90) | 1073.67 (150.39) | 1093.27 (149.34) | 0.462 |
P Value for change in IgG over time within each group (Wilcoxon Test) | <0.001 | 0.021 | <0.001 | |
Overall P-Value for comparison of the change in IgG over time between the three groups (Generalized Estimating Equations) | <0.001 |
Effect of Therapy: Group A showed the highly significant result in morbidity features like Nasal obstruction, Running nose, Wheezing, Dyspnoea, Cough, Fever, Recurrence, Severity, Weight, and Height gain. In haematological parameters, Hb%, Lymphocytes, TEC, IgG showed highly significant results and were insignificant in the rest of the parameters.
Group B showed no significant results in morbidity features, while only Hb% and Neutophils showed significant results in laboratory parameters.
Group C showed the significant result in Nasal obstruction, Running nose, Wheezing, Dyspnoea, and Cough. However, post-follow-up results were not satisfying in Nasal obstruction and Wheezing. Laboratory parameters show the significant result in Hb%, and rest of the parameters is non-significant.
Overall Effect of Therapy: In Group A (Nidigdhikadileha) and Group C (Sitopaladi Churna), improvement was seen in all morbidity features. At the same time, no significant changes were noted in morbidity features in Group B (Honey drops). Compared to all three groups, Group A showed a highly significant result and, after treatment, post-follow-up was satisfied.
Discussion on Mode of Action of Trial Drug: According to Ayurveda classics, Pranavaha Srotasdusti is responsible for all respiratory illnesses. Pranavaha Srotas is the main unit for the lungs and heart. Any pathology or changes in anatomical structure cause Pranavaha Srotodusti. Ayurveda classics also explain the same in terms of Upper Respiratory tract infections under the heading of Kasa, Shwasa, Pratishyaya, Mukha Roga with a complete approach to the remedy of the same. It is established in Ayurveda that Ojas (immunity) plays an effective role in preventing such pathological states. Ojas of an individual are usually challenged in the early life period because of physiological, structural, dietetic, and biochemical limitations. The trial drug Nidigdhikadileha is a component of 4 herbs with multi-dimensional properties. These drugs directly act on the Pranavaha Srotas (Respiratory Tract). Kantakari, Sunthi, Guduchi, and Pippali have Vata-Kaphahara properties. These drugs are dominant in Teekshna Rasa, Ushana Virya, Laghu Guna, and some of Katu Tikshana, so they act on Respiratory tract mucosa and start Vilayana of Kapha Dosha. When obstructed Kapha melted down it resulted in the removal of Sroto Avarodha, which Kapha Dosha, While cause, Ushna Virya dried up the excessive discharge of Respiratory Tract. The Vatahara Guna causes Vatanulomana and pacify Vimarga Kupita Vata caused due to Avarana. Kantkari, Sunthi, Pippali also act as Deepana, Pachana and Vatanulomana. All these actions, especially Srotoshodhana, help regulate the body's metabolism. Kantkari also has a good nutritional value and provides nourishment to the body. Pippali and Guduchi nourish the body with their Rasayana effect and lower the infections through their antimicrobial effect. Overall, Nidigdhikadi Leha decreases the Vata Kapha Dosha, Amapachaka, and Srotoshodhana, by which Ojas and Dhatusara increase in body Vyadhikshamatva will improve.
In modern science, available management like first-generation antihistamines, antipyretics (paracetamol) or anti-inflammatory agents (ibuprofen), cough suppressants such as dextromethorphan, expectorants (guaifenesin), and decongestants such as pseudoephedrine and phenylpropanolamine provide symptomatic relief but do not reduce the duration of illness either they reduce the frequency of illness. The indications of the drug Nidigdhikadileha in Chakradutta are jwara (fever) along with kasa (cough), shwasa (dyspnoea), peenasa (rhinitis), indicating the symptoms of respiratory infections. Drug ingredients suggest that these drugs have immunomodulatory, anti-bacterial, antioxidative, antimicrobial, analgesic, and bioavailability enhancing effects. The immunomodulatory effect may show the sustained effect of the drug and may reduce the frequency and severity of illness. Anti-inflammatory, Bronchodilator effect, antihistaminic and anti-asthmatic, properties may help in alleviating the symptoms and provide relief.
Anti-allergic and anti-tussive, the effect can help in relieving the symptoms. Also, the drugs have a nutritional effect that may add to better growth and development and improve the child's immune system.
This reveals that the ingredients of Nidigdhikadileha possess immunomodulatory, anti-bacterial, anti-oxidative, antimicrobial, analgesic, and bioavailability enhancing effects. Also, the ingredient affects bronchial asthma, anti-tussive and anti allergic effects, and has high nutritional value. Therefore, Nidigdhikadileha can be a potent remedy for managing recurrent upper respiratory tract infections in children.
Limitations of the Study: The present study was done with a small sample of patients due to time and financial constraints. The results obtained are just a preview of information for future researchers to study involving a large sample size. It is expected that further study on this project could be beneficial for the children suffering from recurrent respiratory infections.
CONCLUSION: Statistically significant improvement was found in Morbidity scores- Running nose, Nasal obstruction, Wheezing, Dyspnoea, Cough, and Fever in group A (trial group) (p<0.001). No significant improvement was obtained in group B (Honey) in any of the morbidity scores except for Running nose, in which significant improvement was found. Statistically significant improvement (p<0.001) was observed in Running nose, Nasal obstruction, Wheezing, and Dyspnoea in group C (Active control); no significant improvement was found in cough and fever in this group (Group C). Over time, the overall change in running nose, Nasal Obstruction, Wheezing, Dyspnoea, Cough and Fever Morbidity Score was compared in the three groups using the Generalized Estimating Equations method.
There was a significant difference in the trend of Running nose, Nasal Obstruction, Wheezing, Dyspnoea, Cough, and Fever Morbidity Score over time between the three groups (p = <0.001). Post-treatment follow-up showed significant improvement in all the morbidity features in group A (trial group), p< (0.001), suggesting immune-enhancing and sustained effect of the trial drug (Nidigdhikaadileha). No adverse effect of the trial drug was observed during the study.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: I wish to express my gratitude to my guide respected Dr. Nisha Kumari Ojha, Associate Professor and HOD, P.G. Department of Kaumarabhritya N. I. A. Jaipur, who made this work possible. Her guidance, generous advice, invaluable supervision. A special thanks and deep regards are due for all teachers of Ayurveda faculty NIA, library staff, all paramedical Staff, IT Centre and workers. My sincere thanks to each and every patient who have given their valuable support in completing this work. And at last, I thank one and all who helped me directly and indirectly in this work.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: No, conflicts of interest.
REFERENCE:
- Chakradutta of Sri Chakrapanidutt with “ Vaidyaprabha” hindi commentary by Dr. Indradev Tripathi, 3rd Edition, Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan, Varanasi-221001, Jwarachikitsa adhyaya/ 199
- Chakradutta of Sri Chakrapanidutt with “ Vaidyaprabha” hindi commentary by Dr. Indradev Tripathi, 3rd Edition, Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan, Varanasi-221001, Jwarachikitsa adhyaya/ 199
- Chakradutta of Sri Chakrapanidutt with “ Vaidyaprabha” hindi commentary by Dr. Indradev Tripathi, 3rd Edition, Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan, Varanasi-221001, Jwarachikitsa adhyaya/ 199
- Chaudhary S, Gulati K, Rai N and Ray A: Evaluation of Anti-Inflammatory and Immunomodulatory Effects of Aqueous Extract of Solanum xanthocarpum in Experimental Models of Bronchial Asthma. EC Pharmacology and Toxicology 2.6 2016.
- Sultana R, Khanam S and Devi K: Immunomodulatory effect of methanol extracts of Solanum xanthocarpum IJPSR 201; 2(2): 93-97.
- Pandey RK, Shukla SS, Jain A, Jain A, Gupta VB and Deb L: Evaluation of Comparative Immunomodulatory Potential of Solanum xanthocarpum Root and Fruits on Experimental Animal. Indian J of Pharmaceutical Education and Research 2018; 52(4-2): 237-45.
- Gupta PK, Chakraborty P and Kumar S: G1-4A, a polysaccharide from Tinospora cordifolia inhibits the survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by modulating host immune responses in TLR4 dependent manner. PLoS One 2016; 0154725.
- Nair PK, Melnick SJ, Ramachandran R, Escalon E and Ramachandran C: Mechanism of macrophage activation by (1,4)-α-D-glucan isolated from Tinospora cordifolia,” International Immunopharmacology 2006; 6: 1815–1824.
- Puradare H: A Supelmmuomodulatory role of Tiospora cordifolia as an adjuvant in surgical treatment of diabetic foot ulcers, a prospective randomized cotrolled study. Indian J Med Sci 2007; 61(6): 347-355.
- Sunila ES and Kuttan G: Immunomodulatory and antitumor activity of Piper longum and piperine. J Ethnopharmacol 2004; 90(2-3): 339-46.
- Atal CK, Zutshi U and Rao PG: Scientific evidence on the role of Ayurvedic herbals on bioavailability of drugs. J Ethnopharmacol 1981; 4(2): 229-232.
- Tripathi DM, Gupt N, Lashmi V and Saxena KC: A Agrawal. Antigiardial and immunostimulatory effect of Piper longum on giardiasis due to Giardia lamblia. Phytother Res 1999; 13: 561-565.
- Raj K, Salar and Suchitra: Evaluation of antimicrobial potential of different extracts of Solanum xanthocarpum Schrad and Wendl 2009; 3(3): 97-100.
- Nithya MC and Ragavendran D Natarajan: Antibacterial and free radical scavenging activity of a medicinal plant Solanum xanthocarpum. International Journal of Food Propertie 2018; 21: 313-27.
- Jeyachandran R, Francis Xavier T and Anand SP: Anti-bacterial Activity of Stem Extracts of Tinospora cordifolia (Wild) Hook .F & Thomson. Ancient Science of Life 2003; XXIII(1):
- Nageshwari G, Reddy AH and Venkatappa B: Anti bacterial activity of Tinospora cordifolia extracts on clinical isolates from HIV infected patients. International Journal of Current Research 8(6): 33072-33077.
- Rohini Pungle, Aditya Tambe, Anil More and Arun Kharat: Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant potentiality of Solanum xanthocarpum. African Journal of Biotechnology 2018; 17(37): 1188-1195’
- Dinanath D Patil: Antioxidant Effect of the Stem and Leaves of Solanum xanthocarpum. UJAHM 2013; 01(03): 68-70.
- Shukla Y and Singh M: Cancer preventive properties of ginger: A brief review. Food Chem Toxicol 2007; 4.
- Dugasani S, Pichika MR, Nadarajah VD, Balijepalli MK, Tandra S and Korlakunta JN: Comparative antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of [6]-gingerol, [8]-gingerol, [10]-gingerol and [6]-shogaol. J Ethnopharmacol 2010; 127: 515–20.
- Natarajan KS, Narasimhan M, Shanmugasundaram KR, and Shanmugasundaram ER: Antioxidant activity of a salt-spice-herbal mixture against free radical induction. J Ethnopharmacol 2006; 105(1-2): 76-83.
- Ody, P: London: Dorling- Kinderesly 2000.
- Iram Gull, Mariam Saeed, Halima Shaukat, Shahbaz M Aslam, Zahoor Qadir Samra and Amin M Athar: Inhibitory effect of Allium sativum and Zingiber officinale extracts on clinically important drug resistant pathogenic bacteria. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials 2012; 11: 8.
- Kamrul Islam, Asma Afroz Rowsni, Md. Murad Khan and Md. Shahidul Kabir: Antimicrobial activity of ginger (Zingiber officinale) extracts against food-borne pathogenic bacteria. International Journal of Science Environment and Technology 2014; 3(3): 867-71.
- Singh C and Rai NP: In-vitro anti-bacterial activity of Piper longum fruit. International J of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research 18(2): 89-91.
- Mohib Khan and Mustafa Siddiqui. Antimicrobial activity of Piper fruits. Natural Product Radi 2007; 6(2): 111-113.
- Vedhanayaki G, Shastri GV and Kuruvilla A: Analgesic activity of Piper longum Root. Indian J Exp Biol 2003; 41(6): 649- 51.
- Baskar V, Selvakumar K and Madhan R: Study on Improving Bioavailability ratio of Ant-iinflamatory compound from ginger through Nano Transdermal Delivery. Asian J Pharma and Clinical Res 2012; 5: 3.
- Hiwale AR, Dhuley JN and Naik SR: Effect of co-administration of piperine on pharmacokinetics of beta-lactam antibiotics in rats. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 2002; 40(3): 277-81.
- Khajuria A, Zutshi U and Bedi KL: Permeability characteristics of piperine on oral absorption--an active alkaloid from peppers and a bioavailability enhancer. Indian J Exp Biol 1998; 36(1): 46-50. PMID: 9536651.
- Verma SK, Singh M, Jain P and Bordia A: Protactive effect of ginger, Zingiber officinale Rosc on experimental atherosclerosis in rabbit. IJEB 2004; 42(7): 736-38.
- Utpalendu Jana, Rabindra Nath Chattopadhyay and Badri Prasad Shaw: Preliminary studies on anti-inflammatory activity of Zingiber officinale rosc, Vitex negundo and Tinospora cordifolia (Willid) miers in albino rats Indian Journal of Pharmacology 1999; 31: 232-33.
- Kumar A, Panghal SSS, Mallapur, M. Kumar Veerma Ram and Singh BK: Anti-inflammatory Activity of Piper longum fruit oil. Indian J Pharm Sci 2009; 71(4): 454–456.
- Dongre PR, Bhujbal SS and Kumar D: Bronchodilatory activity of Curcuma longa, Zingiber officinale and Alpinia galanga based herbal formulation (AHF). Orient Pharm Exp Med 2015; 15: 341–346.
- Pawan Kaushik, Dhirender Kaushik and Rubi Rani: In-vivo and in-vitro Antiasthmatic Studies of Plant Piper longum Linn. International Journal of Pharmacology 2012; 8(3): 192-197.
- Gautam P.Vadnere, Ram S.Gaud and Abhay Kumar Singhai: Evaluation of Anti Asthmatic Property of Solanum xanthocarpum Flower Extracts. Pharmacologyonline 2008; 1: 513-522.
- Gohil PV and Mehta AA: Evaluation of Mast Cell Stabilizing and Anti-Anaphylactic Activity of Polyherbal Formulation. Advances in Biol Res 2011; 5(6): 304-308;
- Govindan S, Viswanathan S, Vijayasekaran V and Alagappan R: A pilot study on the clinical efficacy of Solanum xanthocarpum and Solanum trilobatum in bronchial asthma. J Ethnopharma 1999.
- Sachin Parmar, Amit Gagwal and Vishwas Rapariya: Evaluation of anti-asthmatic activity of ethanolic extract of Solanum xanthocarpum Pharmacology 2010.
- Choi JR, Lee CMJung ID, Lee JS, Jeong YI, Chang JH, Park HJ Choi IW, Kim JS, Shin YK, Park SN and Park YMA: pigenin protects ovalbumin-induced asthma through the regulation of GATA-3 gene. Int Immunopharmacol 2009; 9(7-8): 918-24.
- Vadnere GP, Gaud RS and Singhai AK: Evaluation of Anti-asthmatic property of Solanum xanthocarpum Flower Extracts. Pharmacology Online 2008; 1: 513-522.
- Nadkarni AN: Indian Materia Medica. Bombay Popular Prakashan Bombay 1954; 286.
- Elizabeth A. Townsend, Matthew E. Siviski, Yi Zhang, Carrie Xu, Bhupinder Hoonjan and Charles W. Emala: Effects of Ginger and Its Constituents on Airway Smooth Muscle Relaxation and Calcium Regulation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2013; 48(2): 157–163.
- Asad Mahmood Khan, Muhammad Shahzad, Asim MBR, Muhammad Imran & Arham Shabbir: Zingiber officinale ameliorates allergic asthma via suppression of Th2-mediated immune response. Pharmaceutical Biology 2015; 53(3): 359-367.
- Urmila Aswar, Sumit Shintre, Shilpa Chepurwar & Manoj Aswar: Antiallergic effect of piperine on ovalbumin-induced allergic rhinitis in mice, Pharmaceutical Biology 2015; 53(9): 1358-1366.
- Seung‐Hyung Kim and Young‐Cheol Lee: Piperine inhibits eosinophil infiltration and airway hyper responsiveness by suppressing T cell activity and Th2 cytokine production in the ovalbumin‐induced asthma model. J of Pharmacy and Pharma 2009; 61(3): 353-359.
- Bera K, Nosalova G, Sivova V and Ray B: Structural Elements and Cough Suppressing Activity of Polysaccharides from Zingiber officinale Phytotherapy Research 2015.
- Usman R: Anti-Tussive Activity of Piper Longum churna. World J of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2012.
- Mali MC and Harsh N: Nutritional value estimation of the leaves and seeds of Solanum surattense. Journal of Medicinal Plants Studies 2015; 3(1): 27-29.
- More SK, Lande AA, Jagdale PG, Adkar PP & Ambavade SD: Evaluation of anti-inflammatory activity of Solanum xanthocarpum Schrad and Wendl (Kaṇṭakāri) extract in laboratory animals. Anci Sci of Life 2013; 32(4): 222-26.
- Allah Dad Talpur and Mhd. KhdkhwauddiN: Nutritional effects of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) on immune response of Asian sea bass, Lates calcarifer (Bloch) and disease resistance against Vibrio harveyi. Elsevier Volume 2013; 400-401.
How to cite this article:
Amandeep: Clinical study on the immunomodulatory effect of Nidigdhikadileha on pranavaha sroto dushti w. s. r. upper respiratory tract infections in children. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2022; 13(6): 2525-33. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.13(6).2525-33.
All © 2022 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.