COMPARATIVE PHARMACOGNOSTICAL AND PHYTOCHEMICAL STUDY OF LEAVES OF DIFFERENT SPECIES OF MIMUSOPS
HTML Full TextCOMPARATIVE PHARMACOGNOSTICAL AND PHYTOCHEMICAL STUDY OF LEAVES OF DIFFERENT SPECIES OF MIMUSOPS
S.A. Madhak, J.D. Savsani and D.J. Pandya*
RK College of Pharmacy, Rajkot, Gujarat, India
ABSTRACT:
Background: Two primary species of Mimusops are Mimusops elengi and Mimusops hexandra. Leaves of both species are traditionally used in several ailments. However, it is difficult to distinguish the leaves of the species.
Objectives: The present investigation deals with the comparative pharmacognostical study of the leaves of the two species and establishment of its quality parameters.
Methods: Detailed morphological and qualitative as well as quantitative microscopic study was carried out. This was followed by phytochemical screening and estimation of tannins in the two species.
Results: The important diagnostic feature of powder of both leaves include pericyclic fibers, rosette and prism shape calcium oxalate crystals and resinous matter. The leaves show significant difference in their quantitative microscopic parameters as well as their tannin content.
Conclusion: The present work can serve as a useful tool in the identification, authentication and standardization of the plant material and distinguishing the two species from each other.
Keywords: |
Manilkara,Mimusops elengi, Mimusops hexandra, Sapotaceae
INTRODUCTION: Trees of Mimusops (Family - Sapotaceae) grow near forests of western coast of India. Mimusops elengisyn. Manilkara elengi and Mimusops hexandra syn.
Manilkara hexandra are the two main species. Leaves of both species are traditionally used as anti-inflammatory, diuretic, antiurolithiatic, analgesic, anti-pyretic, anti- microbial, tonic and febrifuge 1, 2.
However, leaves are quite similar, which makes it difficult to differentiate the species. The present investigation deals with the comparative pharmacognostical study of the leaves of the two species and establishment of their quality parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Leaves of M. elengi and M. hexandra were collected in the flowering stage from Herbal Garden of RK College of Pharmacy, Rajkot, Gujarat in July 2012. Herbarium and voucher samples of M. elengi (RKCP/COG/23/2012) and M. hexandra (RKCP/COG/ 24/2012) were deposited in the college laboratory.
The fresh leaves were compared morphologically and used for transverse section and quantitative microscopy (stomatal index, rosette diameter, xylem vessel diameter and fibre length). The dried leaves were powdered, stored in airtight containers and used for powder study, phytochemical screening and estimation of tannins.
For microscopical studies, safranin was used for staining. Photomicrography of the transverse sections and the powdered drug was performed using camera. Quantitative microscopic study was performed using camera lucida and stage micrometer scale (Table 1) 3.
Phytochemical screening of both the species was performed using the appropriate extracts (aqueous and alcoholic) and appropriate chemical tests (Table 2) 4-8. Estimation of tannins was done by the established method (Table 3) 9.
RESULTS:
Macroscopy: M. elengileaves are. simple, ovate lanceolate, 6-7cm X 3-4cm, glabrous, glaucous, having acute apex, undulate margin, reticulate venation, curved petiole and upper surface dark green and lower surface light green in color. M. hexandraleaves are simple, obovate lanceolate, 5-6cm X 2-3cm, glabrous, glaucous, having obtuse apex, straight petiole, entire margin and upper surface dark green and lower surface light green in color (Fig. 1).
FIGURE 1. M. HEXANDRA (L) AND M. ELENGI (R)
Microscopy:
Transverse section: Lamina of M. elengiconsists of single-layered compactly arranged cells in the upper epidermis followed by compact, bi-layered palisade beneath which lies 4-5 layers of loosely arranged parenchymatous spongy mesophyll. Mid-rib consists of upper and lower collenchyma with both primary and secondary bicollateral vascular bundles in the central stele surrounded by 2-3 continuous layers of lignified pericyclic fibres. Ground tissue consists of several idioblasts of microsphenoidal crystals.
Resin cells, prism and rosette crystals of calcium oxalate are found scattered in the lamina and mid-rib. Lamina of M. hexandraconsists of single-layered upper epidermis followed by bi-layered palisade beneath which lies 2-3 layers of loosely arranged spongy mesophyll. Mid-rib consists of upper and lower collenchyma with both primary and secondary bicollateral vascular bundles surrounded by discontinuous pericyclic fibres. Resin cells, prism and rosette crystals of calcium oxalate are found scattered in the lamina and mid-rib. Trichomes are rare in both species (Fig. 2-5).
A
B
FIGURE 2: SCHEMATIC TRANSVERSE SECTION
A: M. elengi, B: M. hexandra
U Epi: Upper Epidermis; L Epi: Lower Epidermis; U. Col: Upper Collenchyma; L. Col: Lower Collenchyma; Pal: Palisade; X: Xylem; P: Phloem; Cry, Calcium Oxalate crystals; Pf: Pericyclic fibers; Idi: Idioblasts; V Bun: Vascular Bundles
FIGURE 3: ENTIRE T. S. OF LEAVES (X100)
U Epi: Upper Epidermis; L Epi: Lower Epidermis; U. Col: Upper Collenchyma; L. Col: Lower Collenchyma; Pal: Palisade; X: Xylem; P: Phloem; Cry, Calcium Oxalate crystals; Pf: Pericyclic fibers; Idi: Idioblasts.
FIGURE 4: ENLARGED PORTIONS OF DETAILED T. S. OF M. ELENGI
A: Lamina; B: Upper Collenchyma; C: Stele; D: Lower Collenchyma
U Epi: Upper Epidermis; L Epi: Lower Epidermis; U. Col: Upper Collenchyma; L. Col: Lower Collenchyma; Pal: Palisade; Xyl: Xylem; Ph: Phloem; Pf: Pericyclic fibers.
'
FIGURE 5. ENLARGED PORTIONS OF DETAILED T. S. OF M. HEXANDRA
A: Lamina; B: Upper Collenchyma; C: Stele; D: Lower Collenchyma
U Epi: Upper Epidermis; L Epi: Lower Epidermis; U. Col: Upper Collenchyma; L. Col: Lower Collenchyma; Pal: Palisade; Xyl: Xylem; Ph: Phloem; Pf: Pericyclic fibers
Powder Study: The important diagnostic feature of powder of both leaves include pericyclic fibers, rosette and prism shape calcium oxalate crystals and resinous matter (Fig. 6).
FIGURE 6: POWDER STUDY (X450)
A: Single Pericyclic fibre; B: Pericyclic fibres in groups; C: Resinous matter; D: Prism crystals; E: Parenchymatous tissue having rosette and prism crystals
TABLE 1: QUANTITATIVE MICROSCOPY
PARAMETERS | MEASURED VALUE | |
M. elengi | M. hexandra | |
Stomatal Index | 25 | 22 |
Xylem Vessel Diameter (μ, x10) | 2.8-3.2-3.6 | 2.1-2.6-3.0 |
Rosette Crystal Diameter (μ, x10) | 5.1-5.8-6.4 | 2.1-2.6-3.2 |
Pericyclic Fibre Length (μ, x10) | 15.1-15.6-16.0 | 17.0-17.6-18.1 |
Number of observations = 25
TABLE 2: PHYTOCHEMICAL SCREENING
Phytoconstituent | Test | Result | |
M. elengi | M. hexandra | ||
Alkaloids | Dragendorff’s testWagner’s test
Mayer’s test Hager’s test |
-ve-ve
-ve -ve |
-ve-ve
-ve -ve |
Flavonoids | Shinoda test | -ve | -ve |
Sterols | Salkowski testLibermannBuchardt test | +ve+ve | +ve+ve |
Cardiac glycosides | Legal’s testBaljet test
Keller Killiani test Kedde’s test |
-ve-ve
-ve -ve |
-ve-ve
-ve -ve |
Saponins | Foam test | -ve | -ve |
Tannins | Lead acetate | +ve | +ve |
Phenolics | Ferric chloride testFolin Ciocalteu test | -ve-ve | -ve-ve |
Sugars | Fehling’s testMolisch test | -ve-ve | -ve-ve |
Volatile oil | Sudan red test | +ve | +ve |
TABLE 3: ESTIMATION OF TANNINS
% w/w | |
M. elengi | M. hexandra |
68.37 | 49.08 |
Number of observations =3
DISCUSSION: A detailed comparative pharmacognostic study of leaves of M. elengi and M. hexandra has been performed. The leaves show a few morphological differences. Microscopically, the major difference lies in the fact that M. hexandra has discontinuous pericyclic fibres. The important diagnostic feature of powder of both leaves include pericyclic fibers, rosette and prism shape calcium oxalate crystals and resinous matter. The leaves show significant difference in their quantitative microscopic parameters as well as their tannin content. The present study can be very useful in distinguishing the two species, standardizing their formulations as well as serving as a guide for isolating novel phytoconstituents from them.
REFERENCES:
- Khare, C. P.: Indian Medicinal Plants. Springer, Berlin, 2007.
- Khare, C. P.: Indian Medicinal Plants. Springer, Berlin, 2007.
- Khandelwal, K. R., Kokate, C. K., Gokhale, S. B.: Practical pharmacognosy techniques and experiments. Nirali Prakashan, Pune, 1996.
- Feigl, F.: Identification of individual organic compound. In: Spot tests in organic analysis. Elsevier, London, 1956.
- Fishcher, R.: Praktikum der pharmakognosic. 3rd Ed. Springer, Berlin, 1952.
- Geissman, A.: Modern methods of plant analysis Vol III. Springer, Berlin, 1955.
- Harborne, J. B.: Phytochemical methods. 2nd Ed. Chapman & Hall, London, 1973.
- Robinson, T.: The organic constituents of higher plants, their chemistry and interrelationships. Burgers, Minneapolis, 1964.
- Kanimozhi, D., Kandhymathi, K., Bharathidasan, R., Mahalingam, R., Deepa, S. & Panneerselvam, A.: Antioxidant activity, estimation of total phenolic content and tannin of Leucas aspera and Cassia auriculata. World Journal of Science and Technology. 2011; 1(9), 11-17.
How to cite this article:
Madhak SA, Savsani JD and Pandya DJ: Comparative Pharmacognostical and Phytochemical study of leaves of different species of Mimusops. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2013; 4(3); 1074-1078
Article Information
24
1074-1078
700
1055
English
IJPSR
S.A. Madhak, J.D. Savsani and D.J. Pandya*
RK College of Pharmacy, Rajkot, Gujarat, India
pandyadevang82@yahoo.com
21 November, 2012
24 February, 2013
27 February, 2013
http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.4(3).1074-78
01 March, 2013