COMPARATIVE PHARMACOGNOSTICAL STANDARDIZATION OF GENUS ANISOMELES LINN. R. BR. (LAMIACEAE) SPECIES IN INDIA
HTML Full TextCOMPARATIVE PHARMACOGNOSTICAL STANDARDIZATION OF GENUS ANISOMELES LINN. R. BR. (LAMIACEAE) SPECIES IN INDIA
Y. V. Ushir*, V. R. Chidrawar , S. K. Singh and K. N. Patel
Department of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, Shree H. N. Shukla Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research , Rajkot, Gujarat, India
Department of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, Sal Institute of Pharmacy , Bhadaj, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
ABSTRACT
Comparative Pharmacognostical studies of Anisomeles Linn. R. Br. species (Lamiaceae) in India are carried out. These species are Anisomeles indica L. Kuntze (Syn. A. Ovata R. Br.) and Anisomeles malabarica L. R. Br. Ex Sims, which are highly found in throughout south (Deccan plateau) and northeastern India. The study conducted with the aim of drawing the Pharmacognostical standards for differentiate the species. Macroscopical and microscopical characters, physio-chemical constants, quantitative microscopy parameters, extractive values, fluorescence analysis of extracts, its reaction after treatment with chemical reagents under visible light and UV light carried out. Preliminary phytochemical screening and TLC fingerprint on the various extracts from aerial part of Anisomeles species was also studied. According to the anatomical comparison between two species, the pith structure, sclerenchyma ring of the stems, the cuticle thickness of the leaves, and stomatal distribution on the leaves are the distinguishing features of the species. The determination of these characters will help future researchers in their Phytochemical as well as Pharmacological analysis of this species.
Keywords:
Anisomeles, Evaluation, Macroscopy, Microscopy, Pharmacognosy |
INTRODUCTION: Anisomeles Linn. R. Br. one of the largest genera of the Lamiaceae, is a genus of herbs or under-shrubs, distributed in tropical Asia and Australia. With 29 species, India is one of the richest countries in the world in Anisomeles diversity. Three species found in India yet, Anisomeles indica, Anisomeles malabarica and Anisomeles heyneana 1. Out of these A. indica and A. malabarica were investigated for their biological activities (Anonymous, 1959). Anisomeles indica are used in folk medicine all over the India. It is popularly known as ‘Jirnya’ in northeastern part of India, where it receives widespread used as folk medicine, predominantly in the treatment of intestinal disorders and intermittent fever. Anisomeles indica have anti-microbial, astringent, carminative, ethanolic extract (50%) of the herb showed hypothermic activity and when burnt, acts as a mosquito repellant. The essential oil present in the herb is useful in uterine affections 2, 3, recently the valued plant investigated for its herbaceous activity 4.
Whereas, Anisomeles malabarica useful in halitosis, epilepsy, hysteria, amentia, anorexia, dyspepsia, colic, flatulence, intestinal worms, fever arising from teeting children, intermittent fever, gout, swelling and diarrhea 5. There are many Pharmacognostical studies on the family Lamiaceae in India. However some of them are related with Anisomeles indica 6, there has been no investigation of comparison study related to Anisomeles species as yet. This study is intended to establish, macroscopical, microscopical, Histological, quantitative evaluation and aerial part of the plant to be used as diagnostic features in the identification, evaluation and monograph preparation of the individual plant 7, 8. The aim of this paper is not only to present the Pharmacognostical features and to discuss their taxonomic value but also to determine the distinguishing parameter of these two species, so that future researcher whose area of interest is Genus Anisomeles Linn. can easily identify them.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Plant Collection and Identification: Plant samples of the 2 species were collected from their type localities in October 2009. The identity of the plant material was verified by Dr. (Prof.) D. A. Patil botanist, SSVP’S Science College, Dept. of Botany, Dhule (MS), and Dr. (Prof.) H.B Singh, Head, Raw Materials Herbarium and Museum, NISCAIR, New Delhi, India. Voucher specimen of the plant material has been deposited at Institute level (HNSIPER/Herb-05 & 06). The collecting localities of the species were Toranmal (MS) and Dindigul (TN), India.
Plant Material: The powder of aerial part (inflorescence, leaves, and stem) of Anisomeles indica (AIA) and Anisomeles malabarica (AMA) was prepared by passing through sieve No. 44, and kept in zip pack polytene bags for further use. The proper precautions were taken while storing the powder drug.
Chemicals and Instruments: Compound microscope, simple microscope, glass slides, cover slips, watch glass and other common glassware were the basic apparatus and instruments used for the study. Photomicroscope (OLYMPUS Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi; Model- CH 2OiBIMF) provided Magn US camera was used. Some crystals, starch grains and lignified cell slides were taken under projection microscope. Solvents viz. petroleum ether, chloroform, methanol, ethanol and reagents viz. phloroglucinol, HCl, sudan red III, glycerin, iodine and potassium hydroxide were procured from Loba Chemicals, Mumbai, India.
Macroscopical Examinations: For morphological observations, fresh young leaves (approx. 2-5 cm in length) and herbaceous stem were used. The macro- morphological features of the plant parts were observed under magnifying lens and simple microscope 9.
Microscopical Examinations: Fresh leaves and herbaceous stem of the 2 species were studied transversely and longitudinally, using surface preparations and sections. The different parts of leaf like lamina and midrib were studied according to the methods of Brain and Turner.[10] For the microscopical studies, cross sections were prepared and stained as per the procedure of K. R. Khandelwal 11. The different lens of photomicroscope as, OLYMPUS iNEA 5X, 10X/0.2; India, and 100X/1.25 oil India were used for capturing the photographs.
Histochemical Studies: Histochemical analysis was carried out on the specimen, separately, dilute iodine solution, Dragendroffs reagent, dilute ferric chloride solution, Phloroglucinol + HCl (1:1) etc. The reagent treated hard section of the plant tissue was observed and microscope to detect the presence of histochemical components.
Quantitative Evaluations of the Crude Drug: Moisture content of the powdered determined based on the loss of drying method 12. The ash values (Total ash, acid-insoluble ash and water-soluble ash) were determined, to find out about the physiological state and level of extraneous matter. Extractive values (ether, alcohol and water) were determined according to the official methods prescribed in Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia 13. The successive extractive values carry out as per the procedure cited by Dr. C. K. Kokate 14.
Preliminary Phytochemical Investigation: The chemical investigation was carried out by using standard procedures 15. Total ash of the drug was subjected for testing different inorganic constituents 16, 17. Fluorescence analysis of powdered leaf was done by standard method of Chase and Pratt 18. Behavior of AIA and AMA drug powder with various chemicals was carried out as per Rathee et al 19.
TLC Finger Print Profile: Thin layer chromatography of the methanolic and ethanolic extract was studied and Rf values were determined 20.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Macroscopic Examination: The macro- morphological characteristics of the leaves of Anisomeles indica identified were acute apex, crenate margin, asymmetric base, reticulate venation and hairy to softly pubescent shape. Leaves surface thick, with dimension 3.8-10 x 5.5-6 cm. Color is green to yellowish green; taste is slightly astringent with characteristic odor. The plant shows covering trichomes more on the lower surface of the leaves. Stem is erect, brown to pinkish black, acutely quadrangular, softly pubescent; internodes 7 to 10 cm long; pith white, fracture powdery & fibrous (Fig. 1a and 1b).
1a
1b
FIG. 1: Aerial parts of Anisomeles spp., [1a- A. indica; 1b- A. malabarica]
Whereas A. malabarica leaves simple, opposite, very thick, aromatic, oblong-lanceolate, acute, pale above, white below, crenate-serrate, softly woolly, venation reticulate and slightly winged. Stem is stout, erect, ash grey to blackish brown, densely tomentous, the hairs being woolly soft and white, obtusely quadrangular with a deep furrow on each side; internodes 5 to 10 cm long; pith white, soft, fracture fibrous.
Microscopic Examination: (Fig. 2a & 2b)
Trans-sections of Leaves: They are a dorsiventral (bifacial) leaf. Following tissues are present in lamina and midrib;
Lamina: In TS, the upper and lower epidermises comprise uniseriate, spherical to polygonal cells. Both epidermises are cover with cuticle. The upper cuticle layer is thicker than the lower one in A. malabarica. But, the cuticle thickness is approximately the same on both epidermises in A. indica. There are covering and non covering trichomes on both epidermises. In A. malabarica, the trichomes are fairly dense on the both surfaces. In A. indica the density on the upper and lower surfaces is approximately same. Numerous caryophyllaceous or diacytic stomata present in epidermises, the stomatal distribution in upper epidermis of A.indica is dense comparatively A. malabarica. Mesophyll is traversed by large number of veins and is represented by groups of few spiral vessels.
2a
2b
FIG. 2: Trans-Sections of Anisomeles SPP. LEAVES (2a- A. indica; 2b- A. malabarica); [cu: cuticle, ue: upper epidermis, uc: upper collenchyma, pp: palisade parenchyma, sp: spongy parenchyma, x: xylem, ph: phloem, lc: lower collenchyma, le: lower epidermis, gtr: glandular trichomes, ngtr: non-glandular trichomes]
Midrib: A. indica midrib shows concavo-convex outline in the basal and middle region which becomes more or less plano convex in the apical region. Where in A. malabarica midrib present both surface with different degree of concavity. 4-6 layered collenchymas located below both epidermises, vascular bundles are surrounded by a parenchymatic bundle sheath. Palisade parenchyma are triseriate in A. indica & biseriate in A. malabarica under the upper epidermis. Spongy parenchyma cells are 3-4 layered under the lower epidermis Phloem cells almost encircling the arc of xylem is embedded with dark brown content and occasionally shows isolated or group of few fibres in A. malabarica. Collateral vascular bundle is prominent, occupying the central portion of the midrib. Xylem vessels are covered by xylem fibres in A. indica.
Trans-sections of Stems: Schematic TS of stem is quadrangular in shape exhibiting 4 equidistantly placed pubescent ridges, central wide parenchymatous 4 angled pith encircled by a ring of xylem, very narrow phloem and collenchymatous hypodermis. The detailed TS of the stem are quadrangular shaped. The epidermis consists of single layer rectangular cells, and is surrounded by a thin cuticle layer, traversed with few stomata and bearing simple covering multicellular (2-3 cell) and glandular (non-covering) trichomes. The sessile glandular (non-covering) trichomes observed in A. indica. Cortex is collenchymatous, 2 to 4 layered but many more; reaching up to 10 beneath the primary rides. Endodermis is distinct. There are lignified sclerenchyma fibers between the cortex and vascular tissue. Sclerenchyma fibers are seen as a continuous ring in A. indica and it was uninterrupted in A. malabarica. Cambium is indistinguishable. Central wide pith is parenchymatous; it shows presence of simple starch grains and calcium oxalate crystals (Fig. 3a & 3b).
3a
3b
FIG. 3: Trans-Sections of Anisomeles SPP. STEMS (3a- A. indica; 3b- A. malabarica); [cu: cuticle, e: epidermis, tr: trichomes, co: cortex, sc: sclerenchyma, ph: phloem, x: xylem, xp: xylem parenchyma, p: pith.]
Histochemical Studies: The counter idea about presence of phytoconstituents is obtained through this study like phenolic compound in palisade as indicated by brownish black stain on ferric chloride solution treatment (Table 1).
Quantitative Evaluations of the Crude Drugs: The moisture content seems to be lower than necessary to support the growth of microbes to bring any change in the composition of the drugs. Physical constant as ash value of the drug gives an idea of the earthy matter or the inorganic composition and other impurities present along with the drug. Extractive values are useful for the determination of exhausted or adulterated drugs. The results of the quantitative evaluations of the drug powders are given in Table 2.
Preliminary Phytochemical Investigation: Revealed the presence of primary and secondary metabolites as carbohydrates, mucilage, Tannins, Terpenoids, Glycosides, Alkaloids and Phytosterols (Table 3 & 4). Various inorganic elements present in the plant are Na+, K+, Fe++, So4-, Cl- and No2. The results of fluorescence analysis of the various extracts are presented in table 5.
TLC Finger Print Profile: Thin layer chromatography of the methanolic and ethanolic extracts was carried out using Chloroform: Glacial acetic acid: Methanol: Water (64:32:12:8) and Toluene: Ethyl acetate: Formic acid (7:3:1) as mobile phase respectively and the Rf were recorded (Table 6).
TABLE 1: HISTOCHEMICAL STUDIES OF AIA & AMA
Reagent | Phytoconstituents | Histological zone in leaves | Inference | |
AIA | AMA | |||
Phloroglucinol + HCl (1:1) | Lignin | Vascular bundle | + | + |
Aniline Sulphate + H2SO4 | Lignin | Vascular bundle | + | + |
Weak Iodine Solution | Starch | Vascular bundle, lamina | + | - |
Sudan III Solution | Oil globules | Vascular bundle | + | + |
Aqs. FeCl3 Solution | Phenolics | Pallisade cells | + | + |
Dragendroff’s reagent | Alkaloid | Lamina | + | - |
Libermann-Burchardlt reagent | Steroids | Lamina | - | + |
Millon’s Reagent | Proteins | Midrib region | - | - |
+ Test is positive; - test is negative
TABLE 2: PHYSICOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS OF AIA AND AMA
Parameter | % W/W * | |
AIA | AMA | |
Ash Values | ||
Total | 07.70+0.351 | 11.65+0.545 |
Acid - insoluble | 01.53+0.147 | 02.56+0.160 |
Water – soluble | 06.39+0.284 | 04.46+0.155 |
Extractive Values | ||
Pet. Ether Soluble (40-60o) | 01.25+0.117 | 04.29+0.176 |
Ethanol Soluble (95%) | 10.45+0.232 | 11.71+0.761 |
Water Soluble | 16.12+0.675 | 13.33+1.106 |
Moisture content | 08.67+1.335 | 09.23+0.656 |
*mean of three readings + standard deviation
TABLE 3: SUCCESSIVE EXTRACTIVES (%), FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS, AND PRELIMINARY PHYTOCHEMICAL INVESTIGATION OF AIA AND AMA
Solvent
Extract |
% W/W | Fluorescence
(365nm) |
Alkaloid | Carbohydrate | Phytosterols | Triterpenoids | Saponins | Glycosides | Phenolics | Proteins | Gums |
Petroleum ether
(40-60 0C) AIA AMA |
01.13+0.071 04.13+0.048 |
Blackish green Pale yellow |
- -
|
- - |
+ + |
+ + |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
Benzene
AIA AMA |
00.93+0.035 02.10+0.077 |
Grey Black |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
Chloroform
AIA AMA |
00.96+0.057 01.53+0.082 |
Grey Golden yellow |
+ + |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
- - |
Propanone
AIA AMA |
01.55+0.037 01.05+0.067 |
Blackish green Black |
- - |
- - |
+ + |
- - |
- - |
- - |
+ + |
- - |
- - |
Ethanol (95%)
AIA AMA |
06.84+0.041 04.95+0.055 |
Black Dark red |
- + |
+ + |
- + |
- - |
+ + |
+ + |
+ + |
- - |
- - |
Water
AIA AMA |
16.59+0.065 13.94+0.068 |
Violet Violet |
- + |
+ + |
- - |
- - |
+ + |
+ + |
+ + |
- + |
+ + |
Results are presented as mean + standard deviation; + test is positive; - test is negative
TABLE 4: BEHAVIOR OF AIA AND AMA DRUG POWDER WITH VARIOUS CHEMICALS
Reagents | Color/ppt. | Phytoconstituents | Crude Drug | |
AIA | AMA | |||
Conc. H2SO4 | Red | Steroid | + | + |
Aqs. FeCl3 solution | Black | Tannins | + | + |
weak Iodine solution | Blue | Starch | + | + |
Picric acid solution | Yellow | Alkaloid | + | - |
Aqs. HgCl3 solution | Brown | Alkaloid | + | - |
Mg-HCl Acid | Pink | Flavonoid | + | + |
Aqs. AgNO3 solution | Ppt. | Proteins | + | - |
Ammonia Solution | Ppt. | Anthraquinone Glycoside | - | - |
5% Aqs. KOH solution | Ppt. | Anthraquinone Glycoside | - | - |
+ Test is positive; - test is negative
TABLE 5: FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS OF AIA & AMA DRUG POWDER
Treatment | Day light | UV (254nm) | UV (365nm) | |||
AIA | AMA | AIA | AMA | AIA | AMA | |
Powder as such | Faint Green | Dull Green | Green | Brown | Black | Black |
Powder + 1N NaOH (Aqs.) | Red | Blood Red | Green | Green | Brown | Purple |
Powder + 1 N NaOH (Alc.) | Yellow | Green | Green | Green | Purple | Blue |
Powder + 1 N HCl | Faint Pink | Pink | Pink | Green | Blue | Blue |
Powder + 1 N HNO3 | Green Yellow | Orange | Dull Green | Green* | Dark Blue | Purple |
Powder + Ammonia | Reddish Brown | Yellow | Green* | Dull Green | Violet | Purple |
Powder + Iodine | Blood Red | Red | Green | Green | Purple | Purple |
Powder + FeCl3 | Blue | Brown | Green* | Dull Green | Black | Black |
Powder + acetic acid | Yellowish Green | Green | Green | Green | Blue | Black |
Powder + 50% KOH | Brownish Red | Reddish Brown | Green* | Green* | Purple* | Purple* |
* Fluorescent
TABLE 6: TLC FINGERPRINT FOR AIA & AMA
Mobile phase | Extract | Number of spot and their Rf value |
1. Chloroform: Glacial acetic acid: Methanol: Water (64:32:12:8)
Detection- Alc. KOH |
Methanolic
AIA AMA |
Four spots; 0.04, 0.05, 0.87 and 0.91 Five spots; 0.04, 0.05, 0.53, 0.82 and 0.88 |
2. Toluene: Ethyl acetate: Formic acid
(7:3:1) Detection- 365nm |
Ethanolic
AIA AMA |
Six spots; 0.03, 0.07, 0.58, 0.72, 0.86 and 0.94 Five spot; 0.04, 0.20, 0.57, 0.71 and 0.91 |
The pharmacogno-anatomical, physicochemical and TLC study of the aerial part of a plants may be useful in identifying and differentiate Anisomeles Linn. R. Br. species either in whole or powder form. These comparative data and parameters have been investigated for Anisomeles species to lay down standards which could be useful to find the authenticity of this traditional medicinal plant. These investigations may be useful to supplement existing information with regard to distinguish from substitutes and adulterants. In other words, the pharmacognostic features examined in the present study may serve as tool for differentiating the species for validation of the raw material and for standardization of its formulations at Herbal industrial level in the coming days.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The author(s) are thankful to Dr. Atul Pandya, Satyam Laboratories Rajkot (GS); India, for providing highly sophisticated facilities for, microscopic study.
REFERENCES:
- Kirtikar KR and Basu BD: Indian Medicinal Plants. International Book Distributors, Dehradun, India, Vol. III, 1999: 2212-4.
- A Dictionary of India Raw material and Industrial product. ‘The wealth of India’. Council of Industrial and Scientific Research, New Delhi, Vol VI, 2003: 295-6.
- Nadkarni K.M. Indian Materia Medica. Popular Prakashan, Mumbai, Vol I, 2000: 114-5.
- Batish DR, et al: Phytotoxicity of a medicinal plant, Anisomeles indica, against Phalaris minor and its potential use as natural herbicide in wheat fields. Crop Protection 2007; 26: 948–952.
- Gupta AK, Tandon N and Sharma M. Quality Standard of Indian Medicinal Plants. Medicinal Plants Unit, Indian Council of Medicinal Research, New Delhi, Vol. 6, 2008: 28-37.
- Ushir YV, Chidrawar VR, Patel KN, Tatia AU, Surana SJ. Pharmacognostic Studies on the Leaves of Anisomeles indica (Labiatae). Pharmacognosy Journal (A Supplement to Phcog Mag). 2009; 1: 44-8
- Rangari VD. Pharmacognosy and Photochemistry, Part-I. Career Publication, Nasik, Edition 1, 2002: 368-94.
- Evans WC. Trease and Evans Pharmacognosy. Saunders an imprint of Elsevier, New Delhi, Edition 15, 1996: 253-88, 519 - 21.
- Tyler V., Brady L., Robbers J. Pharmacognosy. K. M. Varghese Company, India, 1977: 103-141.
- Brain KR, Turner TD. The practical Evaluation of Phytopharmaceuticals. Wright-Scientechnica, Bristol, 1975. 81 -86.
- Khandelwal KR. Practical Pharmacognosy techniques and experiments. Nirali Prakashan, Pune, Edition 13, 2005: 130-149.
- WHO, Geneva. Quality Control methods for medicinal plant material. A.I.T.B.S. Publishers and Distributors, New Delhi, 2002: 31.
- Anonymous, the Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India. Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Controller of Publication, New Delhi, Part-I, Vol. I, 1985: 24-28, 143-44.
- Kokate C.K. Handbook of Practical Pharmacognosy. Vallabh Prakashan, New Delhi, Edition 4, 1994: 58-136
- Harborne JB. Phytochemical methods. Chapman and Hall, London, Edition 3, 1984: 88, 203.
- Anonymous, the Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India. Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Controller of Publication, New Delhi, Part-I, Vol. II, 1996: 390, A-100
- Anonymous, Indian Herbal Pharmacopoeia. Indian Drug Manufacturer’s Association, Mumbai; 2002: 1-11.
- Chase CR and Pratt RJ. Fluorescence of powdered vegetable drugs with particular reference to development of a system of identification. Am Pharm Assoc 1949; 38: 324-31.
- Rathee S., et al. Pharmacognostical & Phytochemical Evaluation of Stem of Capparis Decidua (Forsk) Edgew. Pharmacognosy Journal. 2009; 2: 75-81.
- Wagner H and Bladt S. Plant Drug Analysis: A Thin Layer Chromatography Atlas. 2nd Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, New Delhi, Edition 2, 1996: 305-7
Article Information
8
65-73
610 kB
1956
English
IJPSR
Y. V. Ushir*, V. R. Chidrawar, S. K. Singh and K. N. Patel
Department of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, Shree H. N. Shukla Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Rajkot, Gujarat, India
29 May, 2010
18 September, 2010
07 October, 2010
http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.1(11).65-73
01 November, 2010