COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LIGNOCAINE SUBTENONS ANESTHESIA VSPERIBULBAR ANESTHESIA IN MANUAL SMALL INCISION CATARACT SURGERY AND PHACOEMULSIFICATION
AbstractAim: Comparison of safety and efficacy in subtenon anesthesia versus peribulbar anesthesia in manual small incision cataract surgery by randomized control trial. Setting and design: A prospective observational study was conducted among 150 patients undergoing MSICS at a tertiary care hospital and was grouped into two groups peribulbar anesthesia and subtenon anesthesia. Material and Method: After randomization, 150 patients were assessed for various factors including pain at administration of anesthesia and pain during surgery. Result: A total of 150 patients were studied. The result shows no significant difference in pain during surgery and time of administration. Occurrences is chemosis and sub-conjunctival hemorrhage are more common in subtenon than in peribulbar anesthesia. Conclusion: Subtenon’s anesthesia is safe and effective as peribulbar anesthesia and is more comfortable for patients during administration.
Article Information
21
2072-2078
551 KB
176
English
IJPSR
M. Immanuel Jebastine *, Surendhar Amargeeth, Reethika Mathansekar, N. Sandhya, G. Nanda Perumal and D. Bhuvaneshwari
Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vels Institute of Science Technology & Advanced Studies, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
masilaarul@gmail.com
07 January 2024
06 April 2024
16 April 2024
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.15(7).2072-78
01 July 2024
Download