COMPUTATIONAL INSIGHTS ON ANTIVIRAL RESISTANCE MECHANISM OF HIV-1 PROTEASE WITH GS-8374
HTML Full TextCOMPUTATIONAL INSIGHTS ON ANTIVIRAL RESISTANCE MECHANISM OF HIV-1 PROTEASE WITH GS-8374
K. Anbarasu *, Radha Mahendran and R. M. Sharath Kumar
Department of Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, VISTAS, Chennai - 600117, Tamil Nadu, India.
ABSTRACT: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), is an etiologic agent of the most life-threatening disease AIDS. HIV-1 protease (HIVP) is a key enzyme that performs an essential step in the life cycle of the virus. HIV-1 protease assembled as a dimer in the functional form and involved in cutting “polyprotein" into the proper protein-sized pieces. The two chains assemble to form a long tunnel covered by two flexible protein forms a "flaps." The flaps open up, and the enzyme wraps around a protein chain, closing and holding it tightly in the tunnel. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is the current successful treatment approach for AIDS and protease inhibitors plays a crucial role in HAART. The drugs that target against protease consider as one of the major approaches in modern medicine. Till date, 26 anti-HIV compounds have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and 10 are HIV protease inhibitors. The antiviral resistance occurs due to a point mutation in the viral protein which has been a big hurdle in the treatment of AIDS. To decipher the resistance mechanism of HIV-1 protease against current drug GS-8374, the computational studies have been carried out. The molecular docking analysis of protease mutants confirms the loss of crucial H-bonds with the drug that in-turn leads to antiviral resistance. In a nutshell, our studies can provide crucial structural insights on the resistance mechanism of HIV-1 protease against GS-8374.
Keywords: |
AIDS, HIV-1, HIV-1 Protease, Molecular Docking and Antiviral Resistance
INTRODUCTION: HIV-1 virus belongs to the family of retrovirus and one of the deadly etiologic agents of the human disease AIDS 1. Till now, HIV infection is never cured and most challenging disease of a human. With the extensive scientific research carried out for the past two decades, 26 FDA approved antiviral drugs was reported and possess different mechanisms of drug action 2. The current strategy of anti-HIV agents and treatment target suppression of viral load and patient is healthy. The development of HIV drug resistance is the major threat which reduces or even eliminates the efficacy of antiretroviral treatment 3.
The key target HIV-1 protease is a viral aspartic protease which involved in cleavage of Gag and Gag-Pol polyproteins into individual functional proteins essential for viral maturation 4. Drug discovery is majorly guided by the structure-based design based on a computational approach leads to the development of 10 FDA-approved protease inhibitors.
The successful inhibitors namely Amprenavir, Fosamprenavir, Atazanavir, Indinavir, Lopinavir, Nelfinavir and Saquinavir against HIV-1 protease with active sites include residues Asp25 and Ile50 5, 6. Also, the inhibitors represent the potent anti-AIDS drugs reported till date and essential components of the therapy namely highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) 7. Drug resistance to protease inhibitors is become a major issue and leads to HAART failure 8. HIV-1 protease, asymmetric dimer, and both monomers contribute to substrate binding.
The critical active site region is primarily formed by residues 25-32, 47-53 and 80-84 9 and solvent anchoring approach is used to develop protease inhibitors with improved resistance profile 10 and substitute a new lysine Sulfonamide-based molecular core 11. The alternative strategy is mainly focussed on the substrate envelope constraints into the structure-based design and leads to novel potent protease inhibitors which are less susceptible to drug-resistance 12. The major drug-resistant protease mutations are identified as conservative changes involving the gain or loss of a methylene group like I84V, V82I, V82A, I47V, and V32I mutations and also all possess significant impact in inhibitor binding 13. The current clinical data and experimental studies been demonstrated with HIV-1 infection could be successfully treated with the minimized resistance mutations 14.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Dataset: The antiviral resistance mechanism against AIDS was studied by using the key drug target HIV-1 protease of HIV. The experimental 3D structure of wild HIV-1 protease with GS-8374 was download from PDB code 2I4W 15. The 3D structure of 10 protease mutants was modeled using SPDBV 16 and energy minimization performed using Gromacs force field 17.
Molecular Docking: Molecular Docking is a computational method mainly used for identification of novel lead compounds and plays an integral part of drug discovery. AutoDock Vina18 package available in PyRx software 19 was used for docking against HIV-1 protease. Both mutants and drug molecules were prepared for docking using AutoDockTools (ADT) in AutoDock. All the input files were saved in PDBQT format after minimization steps. The docking grid box was generated with the volume of 27000 Å was used for appropriate search space during the process. Blind docking was performed with box size 60 × 60 × 60 Å was used to target HIV-1 protease. The docking results were evaluated by least binding affinity in kcal/mol and number of hydrogen bond interactions with the drug. All visualization of docking results was analyzed using PyMOL 20.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The experimental 3D structure of HIV-1 protease composed of dimer and consists of mostly Beta- strands and one alpha helix. The critical active sites involved in the substrate binding and function of protease. The drug target HIV-1 protease acts as one of the key targets for drug discovery and also a major role in HAART.
The drug GS-8374 is the recent one and identified with better inhibition against HIV-1 protease. The interaction confirmed the inhibition through hydrogen bonds involved by residues Asp25, Ala28, Asp225, Gly227, Asp308, and ASP298. Thus, the interaction with wild-type HIV-1 protease is important for the mechanism of inhibition and disruption in the key interaction leads to antiviral resistance.
Molecular Docking: Molecular docking was carried out for ten HIV-1 protease mutants against drug GS-8374 in AutoDock VINA to identify the binding conformation based on binding affinity. AutoDock results of hits showed ten conformations of docked complex and best pose was selected based on binding affinity. The top complexes were identified based on least binding affinity and number of hydrogen bonds.
The mutant I50L, I54L, V32I, and V82F showed less hydrogen bond interactions compared to wild-type protein composed of six hydrogen bonds and led to antiviral resistance. The other mutants are with unfavorable high binding affinity and hydrogen bonds with the critical residues shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1: DOCKING RESULTS FROM AUTODOCK VINA
S. no. | HIV-1 Protease Mutant | Binding Affinity (Kcal/mol) | Hydrogen Bonds |
1 | I50L | -8.4 | 1 |
2 | I50V | -8.6 | 7 |
3 | I54L | -8.6 | 3 |
4 | I47V | -8.3 | 4 |
5 | D30N | -8.9 | 4 |
6 | L76V | -8.5 | 4 |
7 | V32I | -9 | 3 |
8 | V82F | -8.8 | 3 |
9 | L33F | -8.8 | 4 |
10 | G48M | -8.9 | 4 |
In the case of HIV-1 Protease mutant V32I with GS-8374 complex, the docking results showed three hydrogen bond interactions involved residues Arg8 and Ile50 of the active site. The atom pattern O2…CA of Ile50 with 4.06Å, O2…NH1 with 3.08Å and O2…NH2 with 3.12Å of Arg8 interacted.
In the case of HIV-1 Protease mutant V82F with GS-8374 complex, the docking results showed three hydrogen bond interactions involved residues Arg8, Ile50 and Asp229 of the active site. The atom pattern O2…CA of Ile50 with 4.12Å, O2…NH1 with 2.87Å OF Arg8 and O2…OD1 with 3.43Å of Asp229 interacted.
In the case of HIV-1 Protease mutant I54L with GS-8374 complex, the docking results showed three hydrogen bond interactions involved residues Arg8 and Ile50 of the active site. The atom pattern O2…CA of Ile50 with 4.07Å, O2…NH1 with 3.20Å and O2…NH2 with 3.22Å of Arg8 interacted.
In the case of HIV-1 Protease mutant I50L with GS-8374 complex, the docking results showed one hydrogen bond interaction involved residues Arg8 of the active site. The atom pattern O2…NH1 has interacted with hydrogen bond length 2.99Å.
CONCLUSION: The computational approach was used to address the molecular mechanism of antiviral resistance of drug GS-8374 against HIV-1 protease mutants. The molecular docking study showed the hydrogen bond and hydrophobic interactions was missing in the mutant complexes compared to wild protein complex. The protease mutants I50V, I54L, V32I, and V82F formed fewer hydrogen bonds and loss the critical interaction in favor of the inhibition. The mutant complexes loss the critical interaction pattern found in the wild protein complex. The major reason will be the conformation change in the HIV-1 protease due to a point mutation in the critical active sites. The mechanism of drug GS-8374 with mutants evaluated the antiviral resistance against AIDS. In conclusion, the computational study will be helpful to the biologist and clinicians to explore the specific mechanism of action. Further, molecular dynamics simulation and in-vitro experiments to analyze the resistance/susceptibility of drugs would be key aspects for future direction.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The authors thank the management of VISTAS for providing the facilities to carry out this work.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The author declares there is no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES:
- Barre-Sinoussi, F: HIV as the cause of aids. Lancet 1996; 348: 31-35.
- De-Clercq E: Anti-HIV drugs: 25 compounds approved within 25 years after the discovery of HIV. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 2009; 33: 307-320.
- Chen R, Quinones-Mateu ME and Mansky LM: HIV-1 mutagenesis during antiretroviral therapy: Implications for successful drug treatment. Frontiers in Bioscience 2005; 10: 743-750.
- Kohl NE, Emini EA, Schleif WA, Davis LJ, Heimbach JC, Dixon RA, Scolnick EM and Sigal IS: Active human immunodeficiency virus protease is required for viral infectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1988; 85: 4686-4690.
- De Meyer S, Azijn H, Surleraux D, Jochmans D, Tahri A, Pauwels R, Wigerinck P and de Bethune MP: TMC114, a novel human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitor active against protease inhibitor-resistant viruses, including a broad range of clinical isolates. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2005; 49: 2314-2321.
- Surleraux DL, Tahri A, Verschueren WG, Pille GM, de Kock HA, Jonckers TH, Peeters A, De Meyer S, Azijn H, Pauwels R, de Bethune MP, King NM, Prabu-Jeyabalan M, Schiffer CA and Wigerinck PB: Discovery and selection of TMC114, a next-generation HIV-1 protease inhibitor. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2005; 48: 1813-1822.
- Bartlett JA, DeMasi R, Quinn J, Moxham C and Rousseau F: Overview of the effectiveness of triple combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1 infected adults. AIDS 2001; 15: 1369-1377.
- Zeldin RK and Petruschke RA: Pharmacological and therapeutic properties of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor therapy in HIV-infected patients. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2004; 53: 4-9.
- Ali A, Bandaranayake RM, Cai Y, King NM, Kolli M, Mittal S, Murzycki JF, Nalam MN, Nalivaika EA, Ozen A, Prabu-Jeyabalan MM, Thayer K and Schiffer CA: Molecular Basis for Drug Resistance in HIV-1 Protease. Viruses 2010; 2(11): 2509-2535.
- Cihlar T, He GX, Liu X, Chen JM, Hatada M, Swaminathan S, McDermott MJ, Yang ZY, Mulato AS, Chen X, Leavitt SA, Stray KM and Lee WA: Suppression of HIV-1 protease inhibitor resistance by phosphonate-mediated solvent anchoring.Journal of Molecular Biology 2006; 363: 635-647.
- Stranix BR, Sauve G, Bouzide A, Cote A, Sevigny G and Yelle J: Lysine sulfonamides as novel HIV-protease inhibitors: Optimization of the Nepsilon-acyl-phenyl spacer. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 2003; 13: 4289-4292.
- Altman MD, Ali A, Reddy GSKK, Nalam MNL, Anjum SG, Cao H, Chellappan S, Kairys V, Fernandes MX, Gilson MK, Schiffer CA, Rana TM and Tidor B: HIV-1 Protease inhibitors from inverse design in the substrate envelope exhibit subnanomolar binding to drug-resistant variants. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2008; 130: 6099-6113.
- Ridky T and Leis J: Development of drug resistance to HIV-1 protease inhibitors. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1995; 270(50): 29621-29623.
- Asahchop EL, Wainberg MA, Sloan RD and Tremblay, CL: Antiviral drug resistance and the need for the development of new HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2012; 56: 5000-5008.
- Cihlar T, He GX, Liu X, Chen JM, Hatada M, Swaminathan S, McDermott MJ, Yang ZY, Mulato AS, Chen X, Leavitt SA, Stray KM and Lee WA: Suppression of HIV-1 protease inhibitor resistance by phosphonate-mediated solvent anchoring. Journal of Molecular Biology 2006; 363(3): 635-647.
- Guex, N and Peitsch, MC: Swiss-PdbViewer: A Fast and Easy-to-use PDB Viewer for Macintosh and PC. Protein Data Bank Quarterly Newsletter 1996; 77: 7.
- Lindahl E, Hess B and Van Der Spoel D: GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. Journal of Molecular Modelling 2001; 7 (8): 306-317.
- Trott O and Olson AJ: AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. Journal of Computational Chemistry 2010; 31(2): 455-461.
- Dallakyan S and Olson AJ: Small-Molecule Library Screening by Docking with PyRx. Methods in Molecular Biology 2015; 1263: 243-250.
- DeLano WL: Pymol: An open-source molecular graphics tool. CCP4 Newsletter on Protein Crystallography 2002; 40: 82-92.
How to cite this article:
Anbarasu K, Mahendran R and Kumar RMS: Computational insights on antiviral resistance mechanism of HIV-1 protease with GS-8374. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2019; 10(1): 363-66. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.10(1).363-66.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
39
363-366
556
863
English
IJPSR
K. Anbarasu *, R. Mahendran and R. M. S. Kumar
Department of Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, VISTAS, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
anbarasuk.sls@velsuniv.ac.in
11 April 2018
12 December 2018
22 December 2018
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.10(1).363-66
01 January 2019