CONCISE OVERVIEW ON OVARIAN CANCER AND ITS TREATMENT PARP INHIBITOR, TARGETED DRUG THERAPY, IMMUNOTHERAPY AND MORE
HTML Full TextCONCISE OVERVIEW ON OVARIAN CANCER AND ITS TREATMENT PARP INHIBITOR, TARGETED DRUG THERAPY, IMMUNOTHERAPY AND MORE
Vaishnavi Dhobale *, Rutuja Dhanawade and Trupti Gaikwad
Genba Sopanrao Moze College of Pharmacy, Wagholi Pune, Maharashtra, India.
ABSTRACT: The primary cause of death for women with gynaecological cancer diagnoses is ovarian cancer. It is also, generally speaking, the sixth most common cause of death for women. The majority of cases had advanced diagnoses, which worsens the disease's prognosis. The limited predictive value of the current screening tests adds even more suffering to the situation. The most important early detection techniques, which have not had a discernible positive impact on the morbidity or death of this malignancy, are comprehensive gynaecological evaluation, transvaginal ultrasonography, and laboratory markers such as the cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) assay. However, anti-angiogenic bevacizumab and Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have gained pace in the management of this condition. Traditionally, the treatment regimen involves surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. Although the exact etiology of ovarian cancer is unknown, there are several factors that have been found to raise the risk of the illness. Experts understand that DNA alterations, or mutations, occur in ovarian cancer-causing cells when they originate within or close to the ovaries. The instructions that inform a cell what to do are encoded in its DNA. The alterations instruct the cells to proliferate rapidly, resulting in a mass of cancerous cells known as a tumour. When healthy cells would perish, malignant cells would not die. They have the ability to infiltrate adjacent tissues and split off from the original tumor to travel (metastasize) to different areas of the body.
Keywords: PARP inhibitors, Antiangionic, Gynaecological cancer
INTRODUCTION:
Ovarian Cancer Introduction: Cancer is the leading cause of death in most regions of the world, and it is currently the most prevalent hindrance to obtaining a desirable life expectancy in most countries 1. Ovarian cancer is one of the most frequent gynaecologic cancers, ranking third after cervical and uterine cancer 2.
It also has the worst prognosis and the highest fatality rate. Although ovarian cancer has a lesser prevalence than breast cancer, it is three times more dangerous, and its mortality rate is expected to climb dramatically by 2040 2.
FIG. 1: FIGURE OF OVARIAN CANCER
Different subtypes of ovarian cancer were discussed in nine studies. Studies show that up to 90% of all OC have epithelial origin and the remaining OC have non-epithelial origin 3-5. Among epithelial OC, 3% are mucinous and others are non-mucinous 6. Non-mucinous are further found to have serous (70% of non-mucinous), endometrioid (10%), clear cell (10%), and unspecified subtypes (5%) 9-11. According to recent studies, serous carcinomas are divided into two separate subtypes: high grade and low grade 7-8. Compared to epithelial cancers, non-epithelial cancers are less invasive 9.
FIG. 2: GENERAL CHART OF ASPECTS OF OVARIAN CANCER
Sign and Symptom: Ovarian symptom awareness level as shown in Fig. 1, the most well recognised symptoms were post-menopausal vaginal bleeding (87.4%), abdominal pain (85.0%), and pelvic pain (79.0%). More than half the sample was able to recognise abdominal bloating (71.7%), increased abdominal size (69.4%), back pain (68.3%) and tiredness (59.1%). The least recognised symptoms included a change in bowel habits (49.0%), feeling full quickly (47.7%), difficulty eating (36.3%), and a change in bladder habits (32.0%). The mean symptom recognition score was 6.85 (SD 2.73, range 0–11) 12.
FIG. 3: GRAPHICAL ANALYSIS SYMPTOMS OF OVARIAN CANCER
Ovarian cancer is a type of cancer that arises from different cells of the ovaries the paired female reproductive organ. Early stages of cancer are mostly symptomless, but symptoms are noted during the advanced stages and may include.
- Abdominal enlargement on swelling
- Abdominal fullness and pain in lower abdomen
- Feeling full after eating very little
- Tiredness
- Change in bowel
- Swelling of leg
- Abnormal menstrual cycle
- Weight loss or gain
- Unexpected back pain
- Clothes not fitting well
FIG. 4: SYMPTOMS OF OVARIAN CANCER
Stages Ovarian Cancer:
FIG. 5: STAGE OF OVARIAN CANCER
Screening and Diagnosis Test of Ovarian Cancer: A screening test is used to assess an individual’s risk of developing a disease, and is generally targeted to large numbers of asymptomatic individuals but could also be specifically targeted to at-risk populations 13. A diagnostic test is used to determine whether or not an individual has a given disease, and is targeted to individuals who are symptomatic 13. As such, a diagnostic test must be extremely accurate in determining disease, with particular emphasis on achieving high specificity for disease diagnosis 13. Alternatively, screening tests should generally be focused on achieving high sensitivity for detecting disease in order to limit the number of false negatives leading to missed diagnoses in the test population 13. To give an example of this distinction, the Pap test is a widely used screening method for detecting the presence of abnormal cervical cells 13 however, the occurrence of abnormal cells does not always indicate the presence of cancer. Abnormal cells could be caused by a number of factors such as mild inflammation, bacterial, viral, or yeast infections, or cervical dysplasia 14, 15. When abnormal cells are present in a Pap test, most patients are referred for colposcopy with cervical biopsy, which would serve as a highly accurate diagnostic to determine the presence of cancer 16.
FIG. 6: (A) RELEVANT EMERGING STRATEGIES FOR SCREENING AND DETECTION OF HGSC. (B) CIRCULATING TUMOR BIOMARKERS THAT CAN BE ASSAYED FOR SCREENING AND DIAGNOSTIC PURPOSES
The following tests are used to diagnose ovarian cancer:
Pelvic Exam: During a pelvic exam, your doctor inserts gloved fingers into your vagina and simultaneously presses a hand on your abdomen to feel (palpate) your pelvic organs. The doctor also visually examines your external genitalia, vagina, and cervix.
Imaging Tests: Tests such as ultrasound or CT scans of your abdomen and pelvis may help determine the size, shape, and structure of your ovaries.
Blood Tests: Blood tests might include organ function tests that can help determine your overall health. Your doctor might also test your blood for tumour markers that indicate ovarian cancer.
For example, a cancer antigen (CA) 125 test can detect a protein that’s often found on the surface of ovarian cancer cells. These tests can’t tell your doctor whether you have cancer, but they may provide clues about your diagnosis and prognosis.
Biopsy: A small piece of the ovarian tissue is examined under the microscope to check for any cancer characteristics and its type.
Types of Ovarian Cancer:
FIG. 7: TYPES OF OVARIAN CANCER
Types of Treatment on Ovarian Cancer: Doctors usually treat ovarian cancer with a combination of surgery and chemotherapy. However they may also treat ovarian cancer using radiation therapy, targeted therapy, hormone therapy and immunotherapy.
The treatment option for ovarian cancer include:
- Targeted Drug Therapy
Chemotherapy: Chemotherapy uses one or more drugs to kill cancer cells.
Radiation: Radiation therapy kills cancer cells and shrinks tumours with high-energy beam.
- Targeted Drug Therapy
- PARP Inhibitor
- Anti-Angionic Drugs
- Immunotherapy
PARP Inhibitor: In gynaecologic malignancies, potential therapeutic targeted agents include antiangiogenic agents, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, tumor-intrinsic signalling pathway inhibitors, selective oestrogen receptor down regulators, and immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Pharmacokinetic of PARP Inhibitors:
TABLE 1: PHARMACOKINETIC CHARACTERISTICS OF PARP INHIBITORS
Olaparib | Niraparib | Rucaparib | |
Posology | 300 bid | 300 mg | 600 bids |
Bioavailability | NA | 73% | 30–45% |
AUC 0-24 | 42,000 h ng/mL | NA | 1690 h ng/mL |
Cmax | 58,000 ng/mL | 3 h | 1940 ng/mL |
Tmax | 1–3 h | NA | 1.9 h |
Plasmatic Clearence | 8.6 L/h | 16.5 L/h | 13.9–18.4 L/h |
Volume of Distribution | 167 L | 1311 L | 113–262 L |
Half-life | 11.9 h | 48-51 h | 25.9 h |
Co-Administration with Food | Food assumption delays Tmax of about 2 h |
No influence | After a highly lipidic meal, Cmax is increased by 20% and AUC of 38%, while Tmax is delayed by 2.5 h |
Plasmatic Protein Binding | Dose-dependent: bound fraction decreases from 91% at 1 microg/mL concentration to 82% to qo microg/mL and to 70% at 40 microg/mL | 83% | 70.2% |
Metabolism | CYP3A4/5 are enzymes primarily responsible for metabolism | Carboxilestherasis are the enzymes primarily responsible for metabolism | CYP2D6 and CYP1A2 e CYP3A4 are the enzymes primarily involved in metabolism |
Substrate of | P-gp (clinically non-significant) | P-gp, BRCP, MATE1/2 (clinically non-significant) | P-gp and BCRP |
Cytochromes and Transporters Inhibition | Induction of CYP1A2, 2B6 e 3A4 | Inhibition of MATE1/2 e and mild inhibition of OCT1 | Moderate inhibition of CYP1A2 |
Cytochromes and Transporters Inhibition | Moderate inhibition of CYP3A, P-gp, BCRP, OATP1B1, OCT1, OCT2, OAT3, MATE1, MATE2K | None | Mild inhibition of CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A E P-gp |
Renal Impairment | Severe renal impairment (ClCr< 30 mL/min): not recommended Moderate renal impairment (CrCl 31–50 mL/min): dose reduction to 300 mg × 2 Mild renal impairment (ClCr 51–80 mL/min): no dose adjustment | Severe renal impairment (ClCr< 30 mL/min): not recommended Moderate renal impairment (CrCl 31–50 mL/min): no dose adjustment Mild renal impairment (ClCr 51–80 mL/min): no dose adjustment | Severe renal impairment (ClCr< 30 mL/min): not recommended Moderate renal impairment (CrCl 31–50 mL/min): no dose adjustment Mild renal impairment (ClCr 51–80 mL/min): no dose adjustment |
Hepatic Impairment | Mild or moderate hepatic impairment (child pug A or B): no dose adjustment Severe hepatic impairment (child pug C): not recommended | Mild or moderate hepatic impairment (child pug A or B): no dose adjustment Severe hepatic impairment (child pug C): not recommended | Mild or moderate hepatic impairment (child pug A or B): no dose adjustment Severe hepatic impairment (child pug C): not recommended |
Mechanism of Action: PARP inhibitors (Olaparib, rucaparib, and niraparib) are used as maintenance monotherapies for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer in women who have BRCA1 / BRCA2 mutations 17, 18, 19, 20. BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are involved in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks through the process of homologous recombination 21. Ovarian cancers with BRCA1 / BRCA2 mutations depend on error-prone alternative pathways like the base excision pair (BER) pathway to repair single-strand breaks in DNA damage 21. PARP is a family of DNA-repairing enzymes that play an important role in DNA damage repair via BER 22. PARP inhibitors destroy cancer cells by inhibiting the BER pathway and creating a buildup of damaging double-strand breaks within cancer cells when given to patients with BRCA1 / BRCA2 mutations 23, 24. PARP inhibitors were found to improve progression-free survival but not overall survival 19. Furthermore, the use of olaparib, the first licensed PARP inhibitor, in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy is limited by overlapping hematologic toxicities, necessitating medication dose reduction. Furthermore, acquired drug resistance mechanisms such as BRCA mutant reversions and ABCB1 fusions for PARP inhibitor treatment resistance have been observed in some patients.
FIG. 8: MECHANISM OF ACTION OF PARP INHIBITORS
Adverse Effect of Ovarian Cancer:
Common Adverse Effects:
Gastrointestinal Toxicities: Patients should be counselled about the high potential for nausea and to be vigilant or even prophylactically prevent its occurrence. Nausea was reported by 148 (76%) of 195 patients treated with Olaparib, 280 (75%) of 372 patients treated with rucaparib and 270 (74%) of 367 patients treated with niraparib. Having a light meal with an antiemetic 60 min before taking the PARP inhibitor can also be helpful.
Fatigue: Fatigue is a nearly universal toxicity for all PARP inhibitors. 59–69% of patients had fatigue of any grade with the three approved PARP inhibitors, and grade 3 or higher fatigue was seen in 30 (8%) of 367 patients using niraparib, 25 (7%) of 372 patients using rucaparib, and 8 (4%) of 195 patients using Olaparib.
Expert opinion recommends that non-pharmacological treatments, such as exercise, massage therapy, and cognitive behavioural therapy, can be effective in reducing symptoms.
Effects on the Blood: PARP inhibitors can temporarily affect the number of blood cells in the body. You’ll have regular blood tests to check your blood count. Blood is made up of red cells, white cells and platelets. If the number of blood cells is too low, your next treatment may be delayed or the dose reduced.
Anaemia: Having too few red blood cells is called anaemia. If you feel particularly tired, breathless or dizzy, let your treatment team know.
Risk of Infection: Not having enough white blood cells (neutropenia) can increase the risk of getting an infection such as a urine infection, pneumonia and bronchitis.
Non common adverse effects:
- Neurological toxicities
- Respiratory toxicities
- Musculoskeletal toxicities
- Cardiovascular toxicities
Anti-Angionic Drug: Targeting the angiopoietin axis with non-VEGF inhibitors is an alternate strategy in ovarian cancer and is still undergoing early clinical trials 25. Trebananib, a peptide-Fc fusion protein (peptibody) inhibiting the interaction of angiopoietin-1 and -2 to the Tie2 receptor, has been evaluated in combination with paclitaxel in recurrent ovarian cancer 26. The results of a Phase III trial have been promising. Participants were treated with paclitaxel alone or paclitaxel and trebananib 27.
FIG. 9: CHART OF GENERAL ASPECTS OF ANTIANGIONIC DRUG
Mechanism of Action:
FIG. 10: MECHANISM OF ACTION OF ANTIANGIONIC DRUG
Angiogenesis, the process of new blood vessel formation, plays a pivotal role in normal ovarian physiology, as well as ovarian cancer progression 28. VEGFs A-D and their receptors (VEGFRs 1-3) are among the many factors that regulate angiogenesis and are expressed at varying levels on epithelial ovarian cancer cells; additionally, increased VEGF signalling has been linked to the development of malignant ascites and tumor progression 28, 29. Two angiogenesis inhibitors, bevacizumab and cediranib, with distinct mechanisms of action 30, have shown antitumor activity in patients with ovarian cancer 31, 32, 33, 34; bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets VEGF-A, while cediranib is a small-molecule inhibitor that targets multiple factors, including VEGFRs 1-3 and c-Kit 35.
Following the results of the GOG-0218 and ICON7 studies, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved bevacizumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, followed by bevacizumab alone as maintenance, for the treatment of patients with FIGO (International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics) stage III or IV epithelial ovarian cancer after initial surgical resection Table 1. For patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent/relapsed (PSR) ovarian cancer, bevacizumab is also approved in combination with, and as maintenance after, platinum-based chemotherapy. The FDA and EMA have approved bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, or topotecan for patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer who have had two prior chemotherapy regimens. For both relapsed disease indications, the EMA specifies that patients must not have received prior bevacizumab or other antiangiogenic treatment 36.
Approved angiogenesis inhibitors include:
- Bevacizumab (Avastin®)
- Axitinib (Inlyta®)
- Cabozantinib (Cometriq®)
- Everolimus (Afinitor®)
- Lenalidomide (Revlimid®)
- Lenvatinib mesylate (Lenvima®)
- Pazopanib (Votrient®)
- Ramucirumab (Cyramza®)
- Regorafenib (Stivarga®)
- Sorafenib (Nexavar®)
- Sunitinib (Sutent®)
- Thalidomide (Synovir, Thalomid®)
- Vandetanib (Caprelsa®)
- Ziv-aflibercept (Zaltrap®)
Immunotherapy: Your immune system would be able to protect you from cancer cells, too. But unlike a virus, which your immune system recognizes as a foreign invader, cancer cells are still a part of you. Because of this, the immune system doesn’t effectively recognize and respond to cancer 37.
Immunotherapy is a form of cancer treatment that helps your immune system learn how to identify and respond to cancer cells.
There are several types of immunotherapy, including 37:
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: These are drugs that help the immune system better detect cancer cells.
Monoclonal Antibodies: These are manufactured antibodies that can target specific aspects of cancer cells.
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy: CAR T-cell therapy trains certain immune cells, called T cells, to find and destroy cancer cells.
Cytokines: These are proteins that can stimulate the immune system.
Immunomodulators: These are drugs that help boost the immune system.
Cancer Vaccines: These are vaccines that trigger the immune system to respond to cancer.
Oncolytic Viruses: These are modified viruses that are designed to infect and kill cancer cells.
Current immunotherapy treatment of ovarian cancer:
FIG. 11: CURRENT IMMUNOTHERAPY TREATMENT OF OVARIAN CANCER
Chemotherapy: Chemotherapy uses one or more drugs to kill cancer cells.
A randomized control trial of elderly patients over the age of 70 with comorbidities and stage III-IV ovarian cancer found that carboplatin monotherapy was associated with worse survival outcomes than carboplatin-paclitaxel three weekly/weekly 38. However, when used in combination therapy, a modified dose-dense regimen of weekly carboplatin plus paclitaxel has been shown to be better tolerated with a lower toxicity profile than the standard dosing (three weeks schedule). Despite this, it did not improve progression-free survival in the MIT07 phase III trial, which can also be used in elderly patients with comorbidities 39, 40. It was discovered that the elderly, frail patients had lower levels of neuropathy, thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, and high-grade neutropenia 39. Our ability to predict chemotherapy tolerance will be aided by an ongoing prospective trial involving older women who are at least 70 years old and receiving various combinations of chemotherapy regimens. Preliminary findings, however, indicate that patients with higher baseline instrumental activities on the daily living score are less likely to experience high-grade toxicity and are more likely to finish four cycles of chemotherapy 41.
Radiation Therapy: Radiation therapy kills cancer cells and shrinks tumours with high-energy beam.
In the past, total abdominal radiation was used, but because of a higher risk of toxicity and complications, it was eventually abandoned. Radiation therapy for ovarian cancer is currently only used in palliative care, either to treat localized disease spread or to manage symptoms. Including a subset of patients at high risk, adjuvant radiation therapy has not demonstrated a survival benefit in cases of early-stage clear cell carcinoma 42.
Radiation therapy for ovarian cancer has become less common due to the development of sophisticated systemic therapies. The newest method of palliative radiation therapy is stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Even when local control is achieved, there is ongoing evidence that the use of this medication increases the rate of distant progression of lesions 43. The role of radiation in the treatment of locally recurrent ovarian cancer, particularly in chemotherapy-resistant lesions, is currently being strongly considered. This is due to the introduction of new techniques such as SBRT, intensity-modulated radiotherapy and low-dose hypo-fractionation 44, 45.
CONCLUSION: A woman’s risk of getting ovarian cancer during her lifetime is about one in 67. Ovarian cancer is the type of cancer that begin in the ovaries. these cells multiply quickly and can invade and destroy healthy body tissue over the past 40 years, the treatment of ovarian cancer has undoubtedly improved as a result of better multi- modality care and more recently, the introduction of anti-angionic therapy, PARP inhibitor have achieved significant clinical efficacy in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer. Targeted drugs called PARP inhibitors stop cancer cells' PARP enzymes from functioning properly. This results in the cancer cells dying since it prevents them from mending during cancer treatment. One sort of targeted therapy called anti-angiogenic medicines prevents tumor from growing new blood vessels, which are necessary for the tumor to spread and grow. They function by inhibiting the proteins that aid in the formation of blood vessels or by halting the impulses that cause blood vessels to expand and divide.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: This work would not have been possible without the guidance and the help of several individuals who, in one way or another, have contributed and extended their valuable assistance for the success of this study. I take this opportunity to express my heartfelt and deep gratitude with the sincerity to our principal Dr. Rajesh Oswal for their inspiring and instrumental role in providing me the research and knowledge and guidance for this work. I express my thanks to esteemed guide and mentor Prof. Nikhil Bhujbal (Assistant Prof. & HOD of pharmaceutics) for their moral and technical support and encouraging for successful completion of this work. I extend special thanks to my coauthors, Rutuja Dhanwade and Trupti Gaikwad, for their vital assistance in completing this work.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: There is No conflict of interest in this article.
REFERENCES:
- Momenimovahed Z, Ghoncheh M, Pakzad R, Hasanpour H and Salehiniya H: Incidence and mortality of uterine cancer and relationship with human development index in the world. Cukurova Med J 2017; 42(2): 233–240.
- Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA and Jemal A: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68(6): 394–424.
- Bell DA: Origins and molecular pathology of ovarian cancer. Modern Pathol 2005; 18(2): 19.
- Andrews L and Mutch DG: Hereditary ovarian cancer and risk reduction. Best PractRes Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 41: 31–48.
- Reid BM, Permuth JB and Sellers TA: Epidemiology of ovarian cancer: a review. Cancer Biol Med 2017; 14(1): 9.
- Prat J: Ovarian carcinomas: five distinct diseases with different origins, genetic alterations, and clinicopathological features. Virchows Archiv 2012; 460(3): 237–249.
- Lukanova A and Kaaks R: Endogenous hormones and ovarian cancer: epidemiology and current hypotheses. Cancer Epidemiol Prev Biomarkers 2015; 14(1): 98–107.
- McCluggage WG: Morphological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma: a review with emphasis on new developments and pathogenesis. Pathology 2021; 43(5): 420–432.
- Vang R, Shih IM and Kurman RJ: Ovarian low-grade and high-grade serous carcinoma: pathogenesis, clinicopathologic and molecular biologic features, and diagnostic problems. Adv Anat Pathol 2009; 16(5): 267.
- Kurman R, Carcangiu M, Herrington C and Young R: WHO Classification of Tumours of Female ReSroductive Organs. Lyon: IARC 2014.
- Kurman RJ and Shih IM: The origin and pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer-a proposed unifying theory. Am J Surg Pathol 2010; 34(3): 433.
- Maringe C, Walters S, Butler J, Coleman MP, Hacker N, Hanna L, Mosgaard BJ, Nordin A, Rosen B, Engholm G, Gjerstorff ML, Hatcher J, Johannesen TB, McGahan CE, Meechan D, Middleton R, Tracey E, Turner D, Richards MA and Rachet B: ICBP Module 1 Working Group: Stage at diagnosis and ovarian cancer survival: evidence from the international cancer benchmarking partnership. Gynecol Oncol 2022; 127: 75-82. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.033.
- Katki HA, Kinney WK, Fetterman B, Lorey T, Poitras NE, Cheung L, Demuth F, Schiffman M, Wacholder S and Castle PE: Cervical cancer risk for women undergoing concurrent testing for human papillomavirus and cervical cytology: A population-based study in routine clinical practice. Lancet Oncol 2017; 12: 663–672.
- Haghighi F, Ghanbarzadeh N, Ataee M, Sharifzadeh G, Mojarrad JS and Najafi-Semnani F: A comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional Papanicolaou smears in cervical dysplasia diagnosis. Adv Biomed Res 2016; 5: 162.
- Renshaw AA, Davey DD, Birdsong GG, Walsh M, Styer PE, Mody DR and Colgan TJ: Precision in gynecologic cytologic interpretation: a study from the college of american pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in cervicovaginal cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003; 127: 1413–1420.
- Fairman A, Tan J and Quinn M: Women with low-grade abnormalities on Pap smear should be referred for colposcopy. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 44: 252–255.
- Moore K, Colombo N, Scambia G, Kim BG, Oaknin A, Friedlander M and DiSilvestro P: Maintenance olaparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 379(26): 2495-2505.
- Sambasivan S: Epithelial ovarian Cancer Treat. Res Commun 2022; 100629.
- Cortez AJ, Tudrej P, Kujawa KA and Lisowska KM: Advances in ovarian cancer therapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2017; 81(1): 17-38
- Li Y, Gao Y, Zhang X, Guo H and Gao H: Nanoparticles in precision medicine for ovarian cancer: From chemotherapy to immunotherapy. Int J Pharm 2020; 591; 119986.
- Knowles M and Selby P: Introduction to the cellular and molecular biology of cancer (fourth ed.), Oxford university press 2005.
- Michels J, Vitale I, Galluzzi L, Adam J, Olaussen KA, Kepp O and Kroemer G: Cisplatin resistance associated with PARP hyperactivation. Cancer Res 2013; 73(7): 2271-2280
- Shao F, Liu J, Duan Y, Li L, Liu L, Zhang C and He S: Efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors as the maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials
- Lloyd RL, Wijnhoven PW, Ramos-Montoya A, Wilson Z, Illuzzi G, Falenta K and Young LA: Combined PARP and ATR inhibition potentiates genome instability and cell death in ATM-deficient cancer cells. Oncogene 2020; 39(25): 4869-4883
- Vergote I, Schilder RJ and Pippitt CH: A Phase 1b study of trebananib in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin or topotecan in women with recurrent platinum-resistant or partially platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 135(1): 25–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vergote I, Oaknin A and Baurain JF: A Phase 1b, open-label study of trebananib in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with ovarian cancer receiving interval or primary debulking surgery. Eur J Cancer 2014; 50(14): 2408–2416.
- Monk BJ, Poveda A and Vergote I: Anti-angiopoietin therapy with trebananib for recurrent ovarian cancer (TRINOVA-1): a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15: 799–808.
- Monk BJ, Minion LE and Coleman RL: Anti-angiogenic agents in ovarian cancer: past, present, and future. Ann Oncol 2016; 27(1): 33-39.
- Sopo M, Anttila M, Hämäläinen K, Kivelä A, Ylä-Herttuala S and Kosma VM: Expression profiles of VEGF-A, VEGF-D and VEGFR1 are higher in distant metastases than in matched primary high grade epithelial ovarian cancer.BMC Cancer 2019; 19: 584.
- Orbegoso C, Marquina G, George A and Banerjee S: The role of cediranib in ovarian cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2017; 18: 1637-1648.
- Perren TJ, Swart AM, Pfisterer J, Ledermann JA, Pujade-Lauraine E and Kristensen G: A phase 3 trial of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 2484-2496.
- Burger RA, Brady MF, Bookman MA, Fleming GF, Monk BJ and Huang H: Incorporation of bevacizumab in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 2473-2483.
- Hirte H, Lheureux S, Fleming GF, Sugimoto A, Morgan R and Biagi J: A phase 2 study of cediranib in recurrent or persistent ovarian, peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer: a trial of the Princess Margaret, Chicago and California phase II consortia. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 138: 55-61.
- Ledermann JA, Embleton AC, Raja F, Perren TJ, Jayson GC and Rustin GJS: Cediranib in patients with relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (ICON6): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2016; 387: 1066-1074.
- Brave SR, Ratcliffe K, Wilson Z, James NH, Ashton S and Wainwright A: Assessing the activity of cediranib, a VEGFR-2/3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, against VEGFR-1 and members of the structurally related PDGFR family
- Mirza MR, Avall Lundqvist E, Birrer MJ, dePont Christensen R, Nyvang GB and Malander S: Niraparib plus bevacizumab versus niraparib alone for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (NSGO-AVANOVA2/ENGOT-ov24): a randomised, phase 2, superiority trial Lancet Oncol 2019; 20: 1409-1419.
- Palaia I, Tomao F, Sassu CM, Musacchio L and Benedetti Panici P: Immunotherapy for ovarian cancer: recent advances and combination therapeutic approaches. Onco Targets Ther 2020; 13: 6109-6129.
- Kuroki L and Guntupalli SR: Treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. BMJ 2020; 371: 3773.
- Pignata S, Di Maio M, Gallo C and Perrone F: Carboplatin plus paclitaxel scheduling for advanced ovarian cancer - authors' reply. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15(7): 250-1.
- Ignata S, Scambia G, Katsaros D, Gallo C, Pujade-Lauraine E, De Placido S, Bologna A, Weber B, Raspagliesi F, Panici PB, Cormio G, Sorio R, Cavazzini MG, Ferrandina G, Breda E, Murgia V, Sacco C, Cinieri S, Salutari V, Ricci C, Pisano C, Greggi S, Lauria R, Lorusso D, Marchetti C, Selvaggi L, Signoriello S, Piccirillo MC, Di Maio M and Perrone F: Multicentre Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer (MITO-7). Groupe d' Investigateurs Nationaux pour l' Etude des Cancers Ovariens et du sein (GINECO). Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology (MaNGO). European Network of Gynaecological Oncological Trial Groups (ENGOT-OV-10). Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) Investigators. Carboplatin plus paclitaxel once a week versus every 3 weeks in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (MITO-7): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15(4): 396-405
- von Gruenigen VE, Huang HQ, Beumer JH, Lankes HA, Tew W, Herzog T, Hurria A, Mannel RS, Rizack T, Landrum LM, Rose PG, Salani R, Bradley WH, Rutherford TJ, Higgins RV, Secord AA and Fleming G: Chemotherapy completion in elderly women with ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer - An NRG oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 144(3): 459-467.
- Hogen L, Thomas G, Bernardini M, Bassiouny D, Brar H, Gien LT, Rosen B, Le L and Vicus D: The effect of adjuvant radiation on survival in early-stage clear cell ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 143(2): 258-263.
- Fields EC, McGuire WP, Lin L and Temkin SM: Radiation Treatment in Women with Ovarian Cancer: Past, Present, and Future. Front Oncol 2017; 7: 177.
- Brown AP, Jhingran A, Klopp AH, Schmeler KM, Ramirez PT and Eifel PJ: Involved-field radiation therapy for locoregionally recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 130(2): 300-5.
- Machida S, Takei Y, Yoshida C, Takahashi Y, Koyanagi T, Sato N, Taneichi A, Saga Y, Fujiwara H and Suzuki M: Radiation therapy for chemotherapy-resistant recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncology 2014; 86(4): 232-8.
How to cite this article:
Dhobale V, Dhanawade R and Gaikwad T: “Concise overview on ovarian cancer and its treatment parp inhibitor, targeted drug therapy, immunotherapy and more”. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2024; 15(9): 2590-02. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.15(9).2590-02.
All © 2024 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
3
2590-2602
2578 KB
248
English
IJPSR
Vaishnavi Dhobale *, Rutuja Dhanawade and Trupti Gaikwad
Genba Sopanrao Moze College of Pharmacy, Wagholi Pune, Maharashtra, India.
bhujbal007@gmail.com
26 December 2023
31 July 2024
11 August 2024
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.15(9).2590-02
01 September 2024