CONCOMITANT INFLUENCE OF HEAVY METAL INTOXICATION ON SIZE OF ORGANS AND BODY WEIGHT IN ALBINO RATS
HTML Full TextCONCOMITANT INFLUENCE OF HEAVY METAL INTOXICATION ON SIZE OF ORGANS AND BODY WEIGHT IN ALBINO RATS
Kshama Dwivedi * and D. K. Gupta
Department of Zoology, Bareilly College, Bareilly - 243005, Uttar Pradesh, India.
ABSTRACT: Being exposed to a number of heavy metals in the environment, humans are suffering from various health problems. Cadmium and arsenic are both priority hazardous substances and carcinogens. Environmental co-exposure to these heavy metals is also an important consideration and most experiments with laboratory animals investigate only one heavy metal. In the present study albino rats were exposed to both the heavy metals alone and in combination in 5 groups and the 6th group was of control. Animals were treated for 30 days and 60 days with the lower doses of NaAsO2 (4.3 mg/ks b. wt.) in group B and CdCl2 (2.6 mg/kg b. wt.) in group D and higher dose of NaAsO2 (8.6 mg/ks b. wt.) in group C and CdCl2 (5.2 mg/kg b. wt.) in group E. A combination dose of CdCl2 (2.6 mg/kg b. wt.) and NaAsO2 (4.3 mg/ks b. wt.) was given to another group F of experimental animals. In 30 days, intoxicated animal groups the weights of the kidney, brain and heart increased and a significant increase in liver and spleen occurred both by arsenic and cadmium. Although the high dose of arsenic decreased the relative heart weight but the combination dose showed a significant increase in weight of all the organs. In 60 days treated groups both the heavy metals showed a reduced effect on heart weight, but the increase was observed in the brain, liver and spleen and kidney weight while combination dose showed a significant increase in the relative weight of spleen and liver. Bodyweight gain was reduced in 60 days of treated groups.
Keywords: |
Arsenic, Cadmium, Albino rats and Organ weight
INTRODUCTION: The need for a comfortable lifestyle has raised many health problems in humans, as they are exposed to a number of toxic elements in the environment. Increased industrial processes and intensive agricultural activities have resulted in contamination of food, forage, animal feed and drinking water in many areas these toxic elements have crossed the alarming level of these toxic metals, heavy metals are one of the burning issues. Arsenic has long been recognized as a human poison.
It naturally occurs in the earth's crust and in ground water. Generally, in ground water arsenic occurs at concentrations more than the drinking water standard of 10 µg/l, due to which all the humans are exposed to the low level of arsenic. Many human activities such as mineral extraction and processing wastes, poultry and swine feed additives, pesticides and highly soluble arsenic trioxide stockpiles are not uncommon and have contaminated soil and drinking water 1, 2.
Exposure to arsenic represents a health risk associated not only with its overt toxic effects but also with subtle to profound alteration in immune system. Different epidemiological studies show that arsenic is associated with increased rate of various chronic diseases, including cancer, disease of skin 3, disease of nervous system, peripheral vascular disease (black foot disease, a peripheral artery disease 4 and endocrine dysfunction in the United States and other countries like China and India 35, 5. Cadmium is considered one of the most toxic elements present in the environment. It has long elimination half-life 6. It is often present in polluted area and is emitted during the combustion of coal and mineral oil, smelting, mining, alloy processing and industries that use cadmium as a dye 7 and from agricultural processes 8. Some food products (e.g. Cereals; 9 are also major sources of human exposure as they are grown by using phosphate fertilizers which contains cadmium as pollutant 10. Sewage sludge is also recognized as an important source of cadmium contamination 6. Cadmium has no known biological function but mimics the action of other divalent metals that are essential for these functions 11. Cadmium has the ability to cross the biological membrane and once it binds to ligands with exceptional affinity it causes respiratory and cardiovascular dysfunction, cancer 12 and kidney dysfunction 13. In addition, cadmium exposure can also cause behavioral and neurological disorders. This investigation was designed to determine the effects of cadmium and arsenic alone and concomitantly on the weight of selected organs (liver, kidney spleen, brain and heart of albino rats).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Albino rats of 6 to 10 weeks old weighing 150-160 g were purchased from the Laboratory Animal Resource Section, of Indian Veterinary Research Institute (IVRI) Izzatnagar Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh that was maintained in an experimental animal shed of the division. Animals brought into new conditions were acclimatized to the new environment prior to the experiments.
Rats were kept under conventional condition (6 rats per steel cage, 12 h. light to dark cycle) and were maintained with standard rat food and tap water ad libitum. The experimental rats were randomly divided into 6 groups A, B, C, D, E and F each comprising of 6 animals. Group A was control remaining groups were intoxicated with different doses of heavy metal (arsenic and cadmium) compounds, Group B sodium arsenite (low) with 4.3 mg/kg b. wt, Group C sodium arsenite (high) with 8.6 mg/ kg b. wt, Group D cadmium chloride (low) with 2.6 mg/kg b. wt, Group E cadmium chloride (high) 5.2 mg/kg b. wt and Group F combination low dose of sodium arsenite and cadmium chloride (4.3 mg/kg b. wt +2.6 mg/kg b. wt). The compounds were given in tap water as they were easily soluble in it while the control received only plain water per os by gavage. Rats under the above treatment were monitored for 30 days and 60 days and their body weight were taken weekly. Animals were sacrificed on the next day after the completion of the duration. Blood was collected for hematological and biochemical examination. The respective body organs were taken out for relative organ weight study.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Clinical observations showed that exposed animals were docile and less active than the control group. No mortality occurred in control and other groups treated with the different doses of heavy metal. There was time and dose-dependent reduction in the body weight when treated for 30-60-days duration. The effect of treatment of arsenic and cadmium on different organs of albino rats, when intoxicated for 30-60 days, is given in Table 1 to 4 and Fig. 1 to 5.
TABLE 1: ABSOLUTE ORGAN WEIGHT (G) AND PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN ALBINO RATS AFTER ORAL ADMINISTRATION (GAVAGE) OF ARSENIC AND CADMIUM FOR 30 DAYS
Group | Brain | Heart | Liver | Kidney | Spleen |
Group-A:
Control |
1.66 ±
0.04 |
0.932 ±
0.46 |
7.15 ±
0.42 |
1.56 ±
0.06 |
0.623 ±
0.01 |
Group-B: As (L)
Percentage change |
1.66 ±
1.05(0) |
0.908 ±
0.04(-2.60) |
7.64 ± 0.41(6.9) | 1.65 ± 0.10(5.80) | 0.627 ± 0.03(0.64) |
Group-C: As (H)
Percentage change |
1.73 ± 0.07(4.20) | 0.835 ±
0.04(-10.4) |
7.90 ± 0.40(10.50) | 1.70 ± 0.04(9.00) | 0.732 ± 0.03(17.5) |
Group-D: Cd (L)
Percentage change |
1.70 ±
0.05(2.4) |
0.983 ± 0.08(5.50) | 7.76 ± 0.79(8.53) | 1.62 ± 0.08(3.80) | 0.638 ± 0.05(2.40) |
Group-E: Cd (H)
Percentage change |
1.78 ±
0.02(7.22) |
0.934 ± 0.04(0.21) | 7.84 ± 0.58(10.30) | 1.74 ± 0.17(11.54) | 0.718 ± 0.04(15.25) |
Group-F:As(L) + Cd (L)
Percentage change |
1.82 ±
0.03(9.63) |
0.881 ±
0.04(-5.50) |
7.89 ± 0.48(10.34) | 1.69 ± 0.08(8.33) | 0.723 ± 0.07(16.10) |
As (L) = Sodium arsenite low dose, as (H) = Sodium arsenite high dose, Cd (L) = Cadmium chloride low dose, Cd (H) = Cadmium chloride high dose, All the values are mean ± SE; n = 6, Percentage change values are in parenthetic.
Absolute weight and relative weight of different organs of albino rats when treated for 30 days are given in Tables 1 and 2, for 60 days treated are given in Table 3 and Table 4.
Brain: It is evident from Tables 1 and 2 that in 30 days treated rats, the absolute and relative brain weight showed a significant increase in group F that is 9.63% and 18.79% compared to the control. In the animals treated for 60 days Table 3 and 4, the relative brain weight gain was maximum in group F. This group was treated with a low dose of arsenic and cadmium and the percentage change was 24.04% the duration of exposure seems to be proportional to brain weight gain in rats.
TABLE 2: RELATIVE ORGAN WEIGHT (GM) AND PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN ALBINO RATS AFTER ORAL ADMINISTRATION (GAVAGE) OF ARSENIC AND CADMIUM FOR 30 DAYS
Group | Relative organ weight (g / 100 g body weight) | % Change after 30 days | ||||||||
Brain | Heart | Liver | Kidney | Spleen | Brain | Heart | Liver | Kidney | Spleen | |
Group-A: Control | 0.846 ± 0.02 | 0.475 ± 0.02 | 3.65 ± 0.41 | 0.795 ± 0.02 | 0.317 ± 0.01 | - | - | - | - | - |
Group-B: As (L) | 0.883 ± 0.04 | 0.482 ± 0.01 | 4.06 ± 0.24 | 0.870 ± 0.04 | 0.333 ± 0.02 | 4.36 | 1.47 | 1.32 | 10.18 | 5.04 |
Group-C: As (H) | 0.940 ± 0.01 | 0.453 ± 0.04 | 4.29 ± 0.22 | 0.823 ± 0.03 | 0.397 ± 0.02 | 11.13 | -4.63 | 17.63 | 15.96 | 25.23 |
Group-D: Cd (L) | 0.894 ± 0.01 | 0.517 ± 0.03 | 4.08 ± 0.12 | 0.852 ± 0.07 | 0.335 ± 0.11 | 5.67 | 8.842 | 11.87 | 7.04 | 5.67 |
Group-E: Cd (H) | 0.959 ± 0.04 | 0.502 ± 0.02 | 4.24 ± 0.04 | 0.935 ± 0.07 | 0.386 ± 0.03 | 13.35 | 5.68 | 16.25 | 17.47 | 21.76 |
Group-F: As(L) + Cd (L) | 1.005 ± 0.03 | 0.486 ± 0.01 | 4.35 ± 0.12 | 0.933 ± 0.01 | 0.399 ± 0.04 | 18.79 | 2.31 | 19.27 | 17.22 | 25.86 |
As (L) = Sodium arsenite low dose, As (H) = Sodium arsenite high dose Cd (L) = Cadmium chloride low dose, Cd (H) = Cadmium chloride high dose, All the values are mean ± SE; n = 6
Heart: When intoxicated for 30 days surprisingly, the animals of group D treated with low sodium arsenite showed an increase in relative heart weight value that is 8.84% whereas other groups showed an insignificant change as compared to control (group A). In animals treated for 60 days, group B, and F showed no significant change in the relative heart weight that is 1.97% and 3.7% respectively but decrease in group D from 8.42% to 1.23% and increase in group C from -4.63% to 2.96% was observed.
TABLE 3: ABSOLUTE ORGAN WEIGHT (G) AND PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN ALBINO RATS AFTER ORAL ADMINISTRATION (GAVAGE) OF ARSENIC AND CADMIUM FOR 60 DAYS
Group | Brain | Heart | Liver | Kidney | Spleen |
Group-A: Control | 1.60 ± 0.04b | 0.892 ± 0.02 | 7.84 ± 0.16bdf | 1.67 ± 0.04b | 0.706 ± 0.03b |
C.V. | 6.66 | 5.88 | 4.95 | 5.98 | 9.12 |
Group-B: As (L)
Percentage change |
1.71 ± 0.04b
(6.88) |
0.877 ± 0.03
(-1.60) |
9.32 ± 0.23bc
(18.88) |
1.85 ± 0.03a
(10.72) |
0.748 ± 0.01b
(5.94) |
C.V. | 6.32 | 8.47 | 5.98 | 4.17 | 3.76 |
Group-C: As (H)
Percentage change |
1.71 ± 0.04b
(6.88) |
0.868 ± 0.03
(-2.69) |
9.67 ± 0.21a
(23.30) |
1.88 ± 0.03a
(12.57) |
0.829 ± 0.02a
(17.42) |
C.V. | 5.92 | 8.49 | 5.32 | 4.11 | 6.29 |
Group-D: Cd (L)
Percentage change |
1.70 ± 0.04b
(6.25) |
0.866 ± 0.03
(-2.91) |
8.96 ± 0.23be
(14.30) |
1.85 ± 0.03a
(10.78) |
0.764 ± 0.11b
(8.21) |
C.V. | 5.87 | 8.12 | 6.26 | 4.17 | 3.68 |
Group-E: Cd (H)
Percentage change |
1.84 ± 0.03a
(15.00) |
0.855 ± 0.03
(4.14) |
10.09 ± 0.23a
(28.70) |
1.96 ± 0.04a
(17.37) |
0.858 ± 0.03a
(21.52) |
C.V. | 3.42 | 8.03 | 5.53 | 5.09 | 7.95 |
Group-F: As (L) + Cd (L) Percentage change | 1.86 ± 0.03a
(16.25) |
0.866 ± 0.02
(-2.91) |
10.14 ± 0.23a
(29.34) |
1.92 ± 0.04a
(14.97) |
0.869 ± 0.02a
(23.10) |
C.V. | 3.57 | 8.48 | 5.50 | 5.20 | 6.55 |
As (L) = Sodium arsenite low dose, As (H) = Sodium arsenite high dose, Cd (L) = Cadmium chloride low dose, Cd (H) = Cadmium chloride high dose, values in the same column bearing no superscript common vary significantly (P<0.05). All the values are mean ± SE; n = 6. ANOVA with DMR test, C.V. = Coefficient variance
Kidney: Kidney is a well-perfused organ and if toxic substances are present in the blood, then its large quantities will pass out of the body in urine. Sometimes, the proximal convoluted tubule of the kidney becomes the target organ for toxic substances to which the organism is exposed. It was observed that groups C, E and F showed a maximum increase of relative kidney weight in animals for 30 days that is 15.96%, 17.47%, 17.22% respectively. Animals treated for 60 days showed a maximum increase in absolute and relative kidney weight of group E treated with high cadmium dose that is 17.37% and 23.45%.
Spleen: Spleen is an important organ of the circulatory system and immune system. It gives important interpretation regarding the toxicity of substance entering in the body, group C and F had maximum increase in relative spleen weight of 25.23% and 25.86% in the animals which were intoxicated for 30 days Table 1 and 2. After 60 days treatment, the animals of group C, E and F had shown a significant increase in relative spleen weight. Group F treated with low arsenic and cadmium showed increased relative spleen weight by 39.27% as compared to control after 60 days intoxication.
Liver: After 30 days of exposure, the animals treated with high arsenic (group C), high cadmium (group E) and a low dose of arsenic and cadmium (group F) showed maximum increase in relative liver weight that is 17.63%, 16.25 % and 19.27% respectively. In the animals treated for 60 days groups C, E, F and showed a significant increase in the relative liver weight that is 30.0%, 35.9% and 38.2% respectively.
TABLE 4: RELATIVE ORGAN WEIGHT (GM) AND PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN ALBINO RATS AFTER ORAL ADMINISTRATION (GAVAGE) OF ARSENIC AND CADMIUM FOR 60 DAYS
Relative organ weight (g / 100 g body weight) | % Change after 60 days | |||||||||
Group | Brain | Heart | Liver | Kidney | Spleen | Brain | Heart | Liver | Kidney | Spleen |
Group-A:
control |
0.736 ± 0.02 | 0.405 ± 0.00 | 3.50 3.50 ± 0.15 | 0.759 ± 0.02 | 0.303 ± 0.03 | - | - | - | - | - |
C.V. | 5.88 | 5.25 | 10.55 | 7.41 | 23.29 | |||||
Group-B:
As(L) |
0.806 ± 0.04 | 0.411 ± 0.02 | 4.40 ± 0.40 | 0.872 ± 0.04 | 0.352 ± 0.03 | 9.51 | 1.97 | 23.50 | 14.88 | 16.17 |
C.V. | 12.76 | 14.21 | 21.66 | 10.43 | 22.66 | |||||
Group-C:
As (H) |
0.836 ± 0.04 | 0.417 ± 0.02 | 4.64 ± 0.40 | 4.64 ± 0.40 | 0.399 ± 0.03 | 13.5 | 2.96 | 30.00 | 18.97 | 31.68 |
C.V. | 10.84 | 13.65 | 20.54 | 12.23 | 19.92 | |||||
Group-D:
Cd (L) |
0.805 ± 0.04 | 0.410 ± 0.02 | 4.33 ± 0.40 | 0.870 ± 0.04 | 0.362 ± 0.03 | 9.37 | 1.23 | 21.62 | 15.54 | 19.47 |
C.V. | 12.78 | 12.02 | 22.01 | 12.44 | 22.03 | |||||
Group-E:
Cd(H) |
0.837 ± 0.04 | 0.409 ± 0.02 | 4.82 ± 0.40 | 0.937 ± 0.03 | 0.410 ± 0.03 | 13.72 | 0.98 | 35.90 | 23.45 | 35.31 |
C.V. | 10.84 | 12.05 | 19.77 | 43.55 | 19.46 | |||||
Group-F:
As(L)+Cd (L) |
0.913 ± 0.04 | 0.420 ± 0.02 | 4.92 ± 0.40 | 0.932 ± 0.02 | 0.422 ±
0.03 |
24.04 | 3.70 | 38.20 | 22.79 | 39.27 |
C.V. | 9.94 | 11.74 | 19.37 | 8.34 | 18.90 |
As (L) = Sodium arsenite low dose, As (H) = Sodium arsenite high dose, Cd (L) = Cadmium chloride low dose, Cd (H) = Cadmium chloride high dose, Values in the same column bearing no superscript common vary significantly (P<0.05). All the values are mean ± SE; n = 6. Anova with DMR test. C.V. = Coefficient variance
FIG. 1: CHANGES IN THE RELATIVE BRAIN WEIGHT (g / 100 g BODY WEIGHT) GAIN OF ALBINO RATS IN DIFFERENT GROUPS INTOXICATED BY THE HEAVY METAL
FIG. 2: CHANGES IN THE RELATIVE HEART WEIGHT (g / 100 g BODY WEIGHT) GAIN OF ALBINO RATS IN DIFFERENT GROUPS INTOXICATED BY THE HEAVY METALS
FIG. 3: CHANGES IN THE RELATIVE LIVER WEIGHT (g / 100 g BODY WEIGHT) GAIN OF ALBINO RATS IN DIFFERENT GROUPS INTOXICATED BY THE HEAVY METALS
FIG. 4: CHANGES IN THE RELATIVE KIDNEY WEIGHT (g / 100 g BODY WEIGHT) GAIN OF ALBINO RATS IN DIFFERENT GROUPS INTOXICATED BY THE HEAVY METALS
In the present study, the weight of kidney, liver, brain and spleen increased more significantly in group C and group E with high doses of arsenic and cadmium. Liver weight was reported to seven days and onwards 14 with impaired liver function due to arsenic effect 15 dissociated from gallium arsenide. Few studies 16 shows that mercuric chloride also causes an increase in liver and kidney weight.
Similar toxic effects of arsenic and cadmium on liver and kidney weight were reported by Flora 17 and others researchers 18, 19, 20 and cadmium toxicity. Arsenic cause an increase in the relative weight of the heart in the above result might be due to arsenic-induced oxidative stress 21. Enlarged liver and kidney due to arsenic-induced oxidative stress were also reported by Sayed S 2015 et al. 22 Significant increase of liver, kidney, spleen and brain weight was seen in groups with a high dose of arsenic and cadmium alone. Group F showed a maximum increase of organ weight in almost all treated groups. It might be due to magnification in the toxic properties of arsenic and cadmium when given together. Magnification of organs weight may be the body’s adaptive mechanism to combated systemic toxicity. Moreover, production or an ineffective elimination of ROS (Reactive Oxygen Species) may induce oxidative stress and can cause damage or malfunctioning of various organs including liver, kidney, lungs and spleen due to heavy metal toxicity 23, 24.
FIG. 5: CHANGES IN THE RELATIVE SPLEEN WEIGHT (g / 100 g BODY WEIGHT) GAIN OF ALBINO RATS IN DIFFERENT GROUPS INTOXICATED BY THE HEAVY METALS
In our experiment, group C and group E with a high dose of arsenic and a high dose of cadmium respectively when treated for 30 days and 60 days showed a significant increase in relative brain weight. An increase in relative brain weight was believed to reflect the accumulation of water in cells 25. This accumulation of water maybe because of the inhibitory activity of Na+/K+- ATPase enzyme 36 which was very essential for maintaining osmotic equilibrium by a cell. It is reported that during circulation toxic metals like cadmium, lead and mercury pass through capillaries and cross the blood-brain barrier and settle down in the brain causing neurotoxicity and cellular dysfunction 26.
Among vital organs, after the liver, the kidney was most affected in terms of an increase in both absolute and relative weight. In this experiment, kidney weight seems to be proportional to the dose and time duration of exposure. Similar results were reported by Brown et al., (1979) 27 were kidney weight increased in rats when arsenic was administered via drinking water (40, 85 or 125 mg/l as sodium arsenate) for six weeks in relation to body weight. According to few studies 28 an increase in total kidney weight was not significant when exposed to different doses of cadmium for four weeks. When effect of heavy metals was studied on fish 29, it was observed that cadmium is hazardous for liver, spleen and kidney here it increases the number and size of melano macrophage centers.
In the present study, the relative weight of rats increased in almost all the groups treated for 30 days and 60 days. Among vital organs, the liver was most affected in the case of weight 28. Flora et al., (1998) gave concurrent views where liver weight increased when animals were intoxicated with gallium oxide for 7 and 21 days. Arsenic and cadmium accumulate in liver inducing ROS resulting in DNA strand breaks and lipid peroxidation 30. Although in results, heart is not affected significantly but arsenic and other heavy metals cause cardiovascular disease state such as hypertension, atherosclerosis and microvascular disease by targeting endothelium and leading to endothelial dysfunction 4.
There are reports 31, 32 of decreased renal function, hepatic injuries and disturbance in the electrolyte balance of rats treated with a high dose of heavy metal mixture. The present work demonstrates a significant increase in relative weights of the spleen, and immune system-related organ. Spleen index a useful indicator of immune dysfunction 33, a significant increase in spleen weight suggests that both the metals could exert a direct toxic effect on spleen alone and in combination. This may be due to significant alteration in oxidative complex immune-modulatory effect in spleen causing altered spleen cells responsiveness to IL- 2 to apoptosis 34.
CONCLUSION: The present study shows that both the metals produce toxic effects resulting in reducing the bodyweight along with the organs weight acting as an active stressor. Arsenic and cadmium intoxication shows that both the metals together interact in producing adverse effects on the body organs. The study also sets an alarm that both the metals are toxic for rats even in chronic doses. The exposure limits of these two heavy metals may need to be considered when the risk exposure is high.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The author is thankful to Dr. V. P. Varshney, Principal Scientist (NRL Division), Dr. H. C. Tripathi, Principal Scientist (Pharmacology and Toxicology division) for providing facility to carry out this work and cooperation.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: Nil
REFERENCES:
- Nordstrom DK: Public health. Worldwide occurrences of arsenic in ground water. Science 2002; 296: 2143-5.
- Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry: Toxicological profile for arsenic. U. S., Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Atlanta GA 2007; 1-3.
- Bernstam L and Nriagu J: Molecular aspects of arsenic stress. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health 2000; 3: 293-22.
- Ellinsworth DC: Arsenic reactive oxygen and endothelial dysfunction. June 2015; 353(3): 458-64.
- Chiou JM, Wang SL, Chen CJ, Deng OR, Lin W and Tai TY: Arsenic ingestion and increased micro vascular disease risk: observations from the south-western arseniasis - endemic area in Taiwan. International Journal of Epidemiology 2005; 34: 936-43.
- Patrick L: Toxic metals and antioxidants: Part II, the role of antioxidants in arsenic and cadmium toxicity. Alternative Medicine Review 2003; 8: 106-28.
- Swarup D, Naresh R, Varshney VP, Balagangatharthilagar M, Kumar P, Nandi D and Patra RC: Changes in plasma hormone profile and liver function in cows naturally exposed to lead and cadmium around different industries. Research in Vertinary Science 2007; 82: 16-21.
- Pan J, Plant JA, Voulvoullis N, Oates CJ and Ihlenfeld C: Cadmium levels in Europe: implications for human health. Environmental and Geochemical Health 2010; 32: 1-12.
- Muller M and Anke M: Distribution of cadmium in the food chain (Soil-Plant-Human) of a cadmium exposed area and the health risk of the general population. Science of the Total Environment 1994; 156: 151-58.
- Jarup L: Hazards of heavy metal contamination. Br Med Bull 2003; 68: 167-82.
- European Food Safety Authority: Cadmium in food. Scientific opinion of the panel on contaminants in food chain. EFSA J 2009; 980: 1-139.
- Filipic M, Fatur T and Vudrag M: Molecular mechanism of cadmium induced mutagenicity. Human Experimental Toxicology 2006; 25: 67-77.
- Ferraro PM, Costanzi S, Naticchia A, Sturniolo A and Gambaro G: BMC Public Health 2010; 10: 304.
- Flora SJ: Arsenic induced oxidative stress and its reversibility following combined administration of N- acetyl- cysteine and meso 2, 3- dimercapto succinic acid in rats. Clinical and experimental pharmacology and Physiology 1999; 26(11): 65-69.
- Webb DR, Sipes IG and Carter DE: In-vitro solubility and in-vivo toxicity of gallium arsenide. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 1984; 76: 96-104.
- Dieter MP, Luster MI and Boorman GA: Immunological and biochemical responses in mice treated with mercuric chloride. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 1993; 68: 218-28.
- Flora SJS, Dubey R, Kannan GM, Chauhan RS, Pant BD and Jaiswal DK: Meso 2, 3- dimer-captosuccinic acid (DMSA) and monoisoamyl DMSA effect on gallium arsenide induced pathological liver injury in rats. Toxicology Letters 2002; 13: 9-17.
- Institoris L, Siroki O, Undeger U, Basaran N and Desi I: Immuno-toxicological investigation on rats treated sub acutely with dimethoate As+3 and Hg+2 in combination. Human and Experimental Toxicology 2001; 20: 329-36.
- Institoris L, Siroki O, Undeger U, Basaran N and Desi I: Immunotoxicological investigations in rats, dosed repeatedly with combinations of cypermethrin, As (III) and Hg (II). Toxicology 2002; 172: 59-67.
- Institoris L, Papp A, Siroki O, Banerjee BD and Desi I: Immunoneuro-toxicological investigation of combined sub acute exposure with the carbonate pesticide propoxur and cadmium in rats. Toxicology 2002; 178: 161-73.
- Manna P, Sinha M and Sil PC: Arsenic induced oxidative myocardinal injury: protective role of arjunolic acid. Toxicology 2008; 82(3): 137-49.
- Sayed S, Ahsan N, Kato M, Ohgami N, Rashid A and Akhand AA: Protective effect of Phyllanthus emblica leaf extract on sodium arsenite-mediated adverse effect in mice. Nagoya Journal of Medical Sciences 2015; 77: 145-53.
- Tandon N, Roy M, Roy S and Gupta N: Protective effect of Psidium guajava in arsenic induced oxidative stress and cytological damage in rats. Toxicological International 2012; 19: 245-49.
- Tanju S and Madhuri D: Arsenic induced oxidative stress, haematological and histological changes in liver and protective effect of moringa leaf powder and ascorbic acid in broiler chicken. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research 2013; 5(2): 112-16.
- Stowe HD, Goyer RA, Krigman MM, Wilson M and Cates M: Experimental oral lead toxicity in young dogs, clinical and morphological effects. Archives of Patholo and Laboratory Medicine 1993; 95: 106-16.
- Glian SR, Zaidi SR, Batool M, Bhatti DAI and Mahmood J: Report: Central nervous system (CNS) toxicity caused by metal poisoning: Brain as a target organ. Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2015; 28(4): 1417-23.
- Brown MM, Rhyne BC, Goyer RA and Fowler BA: Intracellular effect of chronic arsenic administration on renal proximal tubule cells. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health 1976; 1: 504-14.
- Chapatwala KD, Hoboson M, Debasiah D and Ranjana B: Effect of cadmium on hepatic and renal gluconeogenic enzymes in female rats. Toxic Letters 1982; 12: 27-34.
- Suresh N: Effect of cadmium chloride on liver, spleen and kidney melano- macrophage centre in Tilapia mossambica. Journal of Experimental Biology 2009; 30(4): 505-8.
- Madejczyk MS, Baer CE, Dennis WE, Minarchickv C, Leonard SS, Jackson DA, Stallings JD and Lewis JA: Temporal changes in rat’s liver gene expression after acute cadmium and chromium expo. PLOS One 2015; 19: 1015.
- Su H, Li Z, Kenston SSF, Shi H, Wang Y, Song X, Gu Y, Barber T, Aldinger J, Zou B, Ding M Zhao J and Lin X: Joint toxicity of different heavy metals mixtures after a short-term oral repeated administration in rats. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2017; 14(10): 1164.
- Kenston SSF, Su H, Li Z, Kong L, Wang Y, Song X, Gu Y, Barber T, Aldinger J, Hua Q, Li Z, Ding M, Zhao J and Lin X: The systemic toxicity of heavy metal mixtures in rats. Toxicology Research 2018; 7: 396-7.
- Bencko V, Wagner V, Wagnerova M and Batra J: Immunological profiles in workers of a power plant burning coal rich in arsenic content. Journal of Hygiene Epidemiology Microbiology and Immunology 1998; 32: 137-46.
- Demenesku J, Mirkov I, Ivinkov M, Popov AA, Zolotarevski L, Katarnovski D and Kataranovski M: Acute cadmium administration to rats exerts both immunosuppressive and proinflammatory effect in spleen. Toxicology 2014; 4(326): 96-108.
- Rodriguez VM, Jimenez-Capdeville ME and Giordano M: The effects of arsenic exposure on the nervous system. Toxicology Letters 2003; 145: 1-18.
- Vallee BL and Ulmer DD: Biochemical effects of mercury, cadmium and lead. Annual Review of Biochemistry 1972; 41: 91-128.
How to cite this article:
Dwivedi S and Gupta DK: Concomitant influence of heavy metal intoxication on size of organs and body weight in albino rats. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2020; 11(3): 1417-24. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(3).1417-24.
All © 2013 are reserved by the International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.