DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF POLYHERBAL TABLET OF TWO ANTI-ULCER LEAVES
HTML Full TextDESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF POLYHERBAL TABLET OF TWO ANTI-ULCER LEAVES
Rupa Sengupta * 1 and N. Maitreyi Zaveri 2
Girijananda Chowdhury Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences 1, Guwahati - 781017, Assam, India.
K. B Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research 2, Gandhinagar - 382023, Gujarat, India.
ABSTRACT: Aim: The present study was to develop and evaluate antiulcer polyherbal tablet as designing of oral herbal formulation. The methanolic extracts of Abrus precatorius (MEAP) and Cordia wallichi (MECW) leaves were used in different concentrations in the formulations. Materials and Method: The current exploration was to design a gastro-retentive drug delivery system of MEAP and MECW using swelling polymer through the wet granulation method. All the formulations were evaluated for weight variation, hardness, friability, drug content, and in-vitro dissolution. In this gastro-retentive dosage form using hydroxypropyl methylcellulose-K4M was prepared to develop sustain release tablets, which could remain in the stomach for longer periods of time, delivering the drug to the site of action. Results: Pre and Post-compression parameters of all the formulations were within the Pharmacopoeial limits, and in-vitro drug release of F8 formulation was found to be 98.29% in 12 h. Conclusion: Dissolution studies of the composition, it was concluded that the formulation F8, which is containing 200 mg of polyherbal extracts, 140 mg of HPMC-K4M, 85 mg of MCC, 65 mg of sodium bicarbonate, 5 mg of magnesium stearate, and 5 mg of Talc is the best formulation. F8 possessed a quick buoyancy lag time of 34 s and a maximum total floating time of 12 h. As the consequence of this study, it may accomplish that the floating tablets using HPMC-K4M are a hydrophilic polymer that increases the gross register tonnage of the dissolution fluid to deliver the drug in a sustained manner.
Keywords: |
Gastro retentive drug delivery system, Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose-K4M, Cordia wallichi, Abrus precatorius, Polyherbal tablets
INTRODUCTION: Pharmaceutical manufacturers all over the world are also focusing on plant-based medicines. In the early development of modern medicine, biologically active compounds from higher plants have played a vital role in providing medicines to combat various diseases. Plant-derived medicines continue to occupy an important niche in the treatment of diseases in developing countries worldwide.
Abrus precatorius and Cordia wallichi leaves are already reported for their antiulcer properties 1-3. It is used by some local Ayurvedic practitioners for general Gastric ulcer ailments. Floating gastro-retentive tablets of methanolic extracts of the two selected plant leaves were prepared to increase the bioavailability and site-specific and local therapy for the ulcers.
The gastro-retentive drug delivery systems (GTDDS) can assist in improving the oral bio-availability of various pharmaceutical drugs that have an absorption window in a particular region of gastrointestinal (GI) tract 4. The design of new oral controlled drug delivery system should be aimed toward achieving maximum pharmacological action of the drugs on targeted site.
The present scenario of the global market is in urgent need of standardized and reproducible herbal preparations, which can be achieved by the formulation of modern herbal dosage forms and their evaluation by modern techniques. Solid oral dosage forms represent the preferred class of product for orally administered drugs. Advantage beings unit dosage forms, easy to handle and transport, convenient and safe.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Material: The authentic plant materials were collected from Kamrup district, Assam, and identified and authenticated by Dr. T. G. Gohil, taxonomist and HOD of Botany, Botanist in BKM Science College, Valsad (Gujurat) bearing the Plant authentification no. Bkm/Bio/37/2018. A voucher specimen of the collected plants was prepared and maintained in the Botany department of BKM Science College received botanic identity, and the identity was confirmed by correlating their morphological and microscopical characters.
Pharmaceutical grades of hydroxypropyl methyl-cellulose (HPMC K4M) from Otto Chemie Pvt Ltd., Mumbai, microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), magnesium stearate, and talc were purchased from (Loba chemicals Ltd. Mumbai) and other chemicals of analytical grade were utilized in this study. Gallic acid (Rf 0.66), quercetin (Rf 0.79), and glycyrrhizin (Rf 0.22) were used as a marker compound for evaluation of the tablet formulation as these compounds are previously estimated and quantified by the HPTLC method in both the plant extracts. Standards Gallic acid 99.5% (HPLC grade), Quercetin 99.5% (HPLC grade) and Glycyrrhizin 99.5% (HPLC grade) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Mumbai).
Preparation of Polyherbal (Floating) Tablet: The Polyherbal tablet contains a uniform mixture of drug, polymer, and other excipients, including the gas-generating agent. The tablets were prepared by direct compression method. Weighed quantities of ingredients given in Table 1. The measured quantities of drug, HPMC, MCC, and NaHCO3 were mixed thoroughly using a mortar and pistil. In order to obtain the granules, the mixture was passed through the 20 mm sieves. The granules were dried in a hot air oven and at last talc and magnesium stearate were added to the blend. Powder blend was compressed into tablet using 16 station tablet punching machine with 10 mm punch.
TABLE 1: FORMULATION OF POLYHERBAL FLOATING TABLETS
Formulations | ||||||||||
S. no. | Ingredients | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 | F9 |
1 | Polyherbal Extract | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
2 | HPMCK4M | 60 | 60 | 60 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 140 | 140 | 140 |
4 | MCC | 185 | 165 | 145 | 145 | 125 | 105 | 105 | 85 | 65 |
5 | NaHCO3 | 45 | 65 | 85 | 45 | 65 | 85 | 45 | 65 | 85 |
6 | Talc | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
7 | Magnesium Stearate | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Total Weight | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 | 500 |
HPMC-Hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose, MCC-Micro crystalline cellulose
Characterization:
Preformulation Studies: Flow properties of granules. The flow properties of granules (before compression) were characterized in terms of angle of repose, Carr’s index, and Hausner’s ratio. For determination of angle of repose (θ), the granules were poured through the walls of a funnel, which was fixed at a position such that its lower tip was at a height of exactly 2.0 cm above hard surface.
The granules were poured till the time when upper tip of the pile surface touched the lower tip of funnel. The tan-1 of (height of the pile/radius of its base) provided the angle of repose.
Bulk density tapped density; Carr’s index and Hausner’s ratio were calculated using tap density apparatus 5-7.
Evaluation of Tablets:
Diameter and Thickness: The diameter and thickness of the tablet were measured by using a vernier caliper. It is expressed in mm. Six tablets were selected at random from each batch, and the mean; standard deviation values were calculated The thickness of the tablet is important in producing tablet identical in appearance. Thickness can vary with no change in weight because of the difference in density of the powders 8, 9.
Hardness Test: Hardness or tablet crushing strength (the force required to break a tablet in a diametric compression) was measured using a Monsanto tester. Six tablets from each batch were selected and evaluated, and the average value with standard deviation was recorded. The mean ± standard deviation values of hardness were calculated 8, 9.
Friability Test: Friability test is performed to evaluate the ability of the tablets to withstand abrasion in packing, handling, and transporting. The Friability of tablets was determined using a friabilator (Roche friabilitor). Ten preweighed tablets were placed in the friabilator, operated for 4 minutes at 25 rpm. After 100 revolutions, the tablets were taken out, dedusted, and reweighed. The percentage friability of tablets was measured as per the following formula 10.
% Friability = (Initial weight - final weight) / (Initial weight) × 100
Weight Variation Test: Uniformity of weight test as described in the Indian Pharmacopeia was followed; a small variation in the weight of the individual tablet is liable to occur. Therefore, a little variation is allowed in the weight of tablets by the pharmacopeia. The following percentage deviation in weight variation is allowed. To study weight variation, 20 tablets of each batch were weighed using an analytical electronic balance, and the mean weight was calculated. Not more than 2 tablets should deviate from the average weight of the tablets 11 Table 2.
In-vitro Buoyancy or Floating Studies: In-vitro buoyancy was determined by the measurement of floating lag time (FLT) and total floating time (TFT). Tablet was placed in a 100 ml beaker containing 0.1 N. HCl. The time required for the tablet to rise on the surface of medium and float was determined as “FLT.” It is expressed in seconds or minutes. The duration of time by which tablet constantly emerges on the surface of medium was determined as the “TFT.” It is expressed in h.
The experiments were conducted in triplicate. Polyherbal effervescence tablet generates CO2 gas, thereby reducing the density, and hence it remains buoyant for a prolonged time period releasing the drug slowly at the desired rate 12.
In-vitro Dissolution Studies: The release rate of polyherbal floating tablets was performed. In-vitro dissolution study in USP dissolution apparatus Type II, in 900 ml 0.1 N HCL (pH 1.2), maintained at 37 ± 0.5 °C at a speed of 50 rpm. At suitable time intervals, aliquots (5 ml) were withdrawn and immediately replaced with an equal volume of fresh dissolution medium to maintain a constant volume for drug dissolution. The samples were filtered through a 0.45 μ membrane filter and diluted to a suitable concentration with 0.1 N HCL. At appropriate time intervals, the samples were withdrawn and assayed spectrophotometrically using Shimarzu double beam UV-visible spectro-photometer at 274 nm λmax after filtration through Whatman filter paper and with suitable dilutions. The methodology for in vitro dissolution was kept the same for all the batches prepared. The experi-ment was done in triplicates. Cumulative percent-tage drug release was calculated using an equation obtained from a standard calibration curve 13.
Drug Release Kinetic Study of Optimized Formulation: Drug release kinetics was obtained by applying the release data to various models such as zero order, first order, Higuchi matrix, and Korsmeyer-Peppas model. Several kinetic models have been proposed to describe the release characteristics of a drug from a matrix. The three parameters were used to study the release mechanism, i.e., release rate constant (k), correlation coefficient (R), and release exponent (n) and determine the best fit model for optimized formulation 14.
TABLE 2: RELATION BETWEEN AVERAGE TABLET WEIGHT AND % DEVIATION ALLOWED AS PER IP
Average Tablet Weight | Deviation Allowed % |
80 mg or less | 10 |
More than 80 mg but<250 mg | 7.5 |
250 mg or more | 5 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Flow Properties of Granules: The pre-formulation study results obtained on various parameters on granules were found satisfactory.
The granules obtained for the batches (F1-F9) were satisfactory. No ratholing, capping, or sticking was observed during the flow of granules from the hopper. The compressibility index and Hausner’s ratio values were obtained for granules of all the batches and were found to be in the range of 14.36-17.96 and 1.10-1.219 (<1.25) respectively as shown in Table 3. All these values indicate that the prepared granules exhibited good flow properties.
TABLE 3: CHARACTERIZATION OF GRANULES
Parameters | Powder blend for | ||||||||
FI | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 | F9 | |
Angle of repose | 35.2±0.058º | 35.4±0.115º | 35.2±0.153º | 34.2±0.115º | 35.17±0.058º | 34.40±0.100º | 35.2±0.100º | 35.1±0.173º | 34.23±0.058º |
Loose bulk
density (g/cm3) |
0.470±0.005 | 0.461±0.014 | 0.478±0.004 | 0.474±0.010 | 0.473±0.017 | 0.480±0.004 | 0.460±0.033 | 0.492±0.021 | 0.482±0.016 |
Tapped bulk
density (g/cm3) |
0.517±0.004 | 0.522±0.001 | 0.524±0.004 | 0.540±0.003 | 0.520±0.004 | 0.555±0.010 | 0.520±0.002 | 0.575±0.002 | 0.569±0.019 |
Hausner ratio | 1.10±0.023 | 1.22±0.061 | 1.21±0.017 | 1.24±0.047 | 1.22±0.071 | 1.16±0.030 | 1.15±0.133 | 1.17±0.085 | 1.24±0.028 |
Compressibility
Index (%) |
15.63±0.617 | 17.9±2.85 | 17.8±0.868 | 17.6±2.29 | 14.3±3.78 | 14.5±0.38 | 16.6±6.64 | 17.2±4.24 | 16.9±1.25 |
Flow character | Good | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | Good | Good |
Number of experiments n=6, mean), LBD-Loose Bulk Density, TBD-Tapped Bulk Density greenish brown coloured with a smooth surface having acceptable elegance.
Diameter and Thickness: Diameter of tablets of all batches were observed in between 10 mm The thickness of the tablets of all the batches were found in the range of 4.69-4.79 mm indicating fairly acceptable. Results were given in Table 4.
Hardness Test: The hardness of all the tablets was found to be in the range of 5.2 kg/cm²-5.5 kg/cm². Results were given in Table 4.
Friability Test: Friability value for tablets of none of the batch was more than 0.38%, <1% indicating good mechanical resistance.
Weight Variation Test: The maximum weight variation of the tablets was ±0.08%, which falls within the acceptable range of ± 5%; hence the tablets, passed the weight variation test. Results were given in Table 4.
TABLE 4: POST COMPRESSION PARAMETER OF FLOATING TABLET
Evaluation Parameters | |||||
Diameter (mm) | Thickness (mm) | Hardness (kg/cm2) | Friability (%) | Average Weight Variation | |
F1 | 10 | 4.69±0.09 | 5.4±0.13 | 0.38±0.01 | 499.7±0.52 |
F2 | 10 | 4.70±0.09 | 5.3±0.12 | 0.20±0.02 | 499.7±0.46 |
F3 | 10 | 4.79±0.12 | 5.4±0.06 | 0.32±0.01 | 499.7±0.34 |
F4 | 10 | 4.69±0.13 | 5.4±0.07 | 0.36±0.02 | 499.9±0.25 |
F5 | 10 | 4.71±0.11 | 5.5±0.04 | 0.33±0.02 | 500.0±0.24 |
F6 | 10 | 4.72±0.08 | 5.6±0.04 | 0.35±0.01 | 500.0±0.68 |
F7 | 10 | 4.77±0.08 | 5.2±0.05 | 0.33±0.02 | 499.6±0.71 |
F8 | 10 | 4.79±0.01 | 5.2±0.06 | 0.34±0.02 | 499.6±0.19 |
F9 | 10 | 4.70±0.06 | 5.4±0.09 | 0.32±0.01 | 500.1±0.54 |
Number of experiments n=10, 10, 13, 20 (mean) ± SD
In-vitro Buoyancy or Floating Studies: The results of FLT and TFT are shown in Table 5. The gas generated is trapped and protected within the gel, formed by the hydration of the polymer, thus decreasing the density of the tablet. As the density of the tablet falls, the tablet became buoyant.
FIG. 1: PHOTOGRAPHS OF IN-VITRO BOUNCY STUDY OF OPTIMIZED FORMULATION F8 AT DIFFERENT TIMES, A (10 MIN), B (2 H), C (12 H)
The floating lag time ranged from 34 s to 55 s. From Table 5, it was found that the formulation F8 has a minimum floating lag time of 34 s and a maximum total floating time of 12 h.
Thus, it was taken as the optimum formulation. Photographs of in-vitro buoyancy study of optimized formulation F8 as shown in Fig. 1.
TABLE 5: BUOYANCY OR FLOATING LAG TIME AND TOTAL FLOATING TIME
Formulation
Code |
Floating Lag time
(Sec) (±SD, n=3) FLT |
Total Floating
Time (h) TFT |
Tablet shape
|
F1 | 44±0.5 | 5.5 | Swollen and Retained integrity |
F2 | 55±0.6 | 3.5 | Swollen and Retained integrity |
F3 | 50±0.4 | 6.5 | Swollen and Retained integrity |
F4 | 52±0.5 | 4.5 | Swollen and Retained integrity |
F5 | 45±0.4 | 6.5 | Swollen and Retained integrity |
F6 | 50±0.5 | 8 | Swollen and Retained integrity |
F7 | 42±0.3 | 10.5 | Swollen and Retained integrity |
F8 | 34±0.2 | 12 | Swollen and Retained integrity |
F9 | 38±0.4 | 11.5 | Swollen and Retained integrity |
*All values are expressed in mean ± standard deviation, n=3. FLT: Floating lag time
In-vitro Dissolution Studies: The in-vitro dissolution studies were conducted for all formulations in triplicate, and the dissolution graph was drawn with error bars pertaining to the standard deviation of the three tests. All tablets retained their integrity throughout the study and released the drug in a controlled manner, as shown in Fig. 3. Nine batches of formulations (F1-F9) which had HPMC composition up to 140 mg had an earlier release of drug for the same amount of sodium bicarbonate. Amongst all these formula-tions the F8 formulation composed of 140:65 ratio of HPMC K4M and NaHCO3 showed 23.56% of drug release at 1 h, and 98.29% of drug release was obtained at the end of 12 h, which will meet the required concentration of the drug targeted to upper part of the GIT, thus was selected for further studies as an optimized formulation.
TABLE 6: IN-VITRO DRUG RELEASE OF F1 F9 FORMULATION
Time (H) | Cumulative % Drug Release | ||||||||
F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 | F9 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 39.22 | 13.6 | 15.4 | 25.71 | 20.15 | 31.52 | 17.34 | 23.56 | 22.34 |
2 | 48.33 | 19.33 | 23.57 | 33.87 | 38.21 | 46.65 | 29.91 | 43.19 | 29.99 |
3 | 62.12 | 21.54 | 31.04 | 40.47 | 45.42 | 54.25 | 37.2 | 49.09 | 50.2 |
4 | 75.55 | 25.22 | 38.25 | 43.62 | 52.26 | 60.23 | 46.68 | 56.61 | 57.68 |
5 | 84.44 | 28.44 | 44.15 | 47.62 | 58.23 | 68.38 | 53.73 | 61.33 | 59.73 |
6 | 93.63 | 32.23 | 49.23 | 53.43 | 64.69 | 77.13 | 60.92 | 67.36 | 65.92 |
7 | 99.67 | 38.7 | 53.7 | 59.7 | 69.15 | 85.32 | 66.53 | 73.75 | 75.53 |
8 | 41.55 | 57.55 | 64.23 | 74.58 | 92.51 | 71.2 | 78.04 | 78.12 | |
9 | 46.2 | 63.22 | 70.31 | 81.28 | 97.45 | 77.08 | 84.14 | 79.08 | |
10 | 50.34 | 66.11 | 73.61 | 85.12 | 99.12 | 80.12 | 88.92 | 80.12 | |
11 | 54.77 | 69.23 | 77.13 | 89.35 | 100.35 | 83.35 | 93.55 | 82.35 | |
12 | 57.28 | 70.58 | 79.21 | 92.73 | 100.23 | 85.26 | 98.29 | 92.26 |
Drug Release Kinetic Study of Optimized Formulation: The various kinetic models were analyzed for all the formulations. It was found from Table 7 that the optimum formulation was F8 i.e., having HPMC K4M had the minimum floating lag time and higher drug release. Among all the formulations, F8 found to be best fitted in Higuchi kinetics with RH value of 0.9960, followed by zero-order (RO = 0.921) and first-order (RF = 0.488) kinetics. This explains that drug release from the Polyherbal floating tablet followed primarily diffusion-controlled release mechanism. Further, to confirm the drug release mechanism from the formulations, the in-vitro drug release data at various time points were fitted into the Korsemayer-Peppas equation. The obtained nP values of all the formulations were greater than 0.45 and less than 1. Hence, it is revealed that the mechanism of drug release was a non-Fickian or anomalous diffusion.
TABLE 7: DRUG RELEASE KINETICS AND MODEL FITTING DATA OF FLOATING CONTROLLED RELEASE POLYHERBAL TABLETS
Formulation
Code |
Zero-order Release
Kinetics |
First-order Release
Kinetics |
Korsmeyer–Peppas equation | Higuchi
Kinetic Model |
|||||
RO2 | KO | RF2 | KF | RKP2 | n | KKP | RH2 | KH | |
F1 | 0.926 | 12.99 | 0.537 | 0.198 | 0.522 | 0.938 | 1.441 | 0.995 | 37.93 |
F2 | 0.978 | 4.343 | 0.608 | 0.092 | 0.691 | 0.712 | 1.028 | 0.966 | 16.68 |
F3 | 0.949 | 5.535 | 0.552 | 0.099 | 0.677 | 0.789 | 1.119 | 0.991 | 21.85 |
F4 | 0.928 | 5.682 | 0.485 | 0.089 | 0.579 | 0.908 | 1.020 | 0.993 | 22.70 |
F5 | 0.931 | 6.885 | 0.512 | 0.096 | 0.632 | 0.890 | 1.120 | 0.995 | 27.51 |
F6 | 0.892 | 7.508 | 0.461 | 0.093 | 0.569 | 0.987 | 1.088 | 0.989 | 30.55 |
F7 | 0.943 | 6.724 | 0.552 | 0.099 | 0.676 | 0.831 | 1.149 | 0.990 | 26.63 |
F8 | 0.921 | 7.049 | 0.488 | 0.094 | 0.603 | 0.931 | 1.101 | 0.996 | 28.31 |
F9 | 0.882 | 6.579 | 0.496 | 0.095 | 0.622 | 0.899 | 1.111 | 0.977 | 26.76 |
CONCLUSION: The effect of ingredients in the polyherbal tablet was analyzed, where HPMCK4M contributed as the floating matrix, MCC to decrease the bulk density of the tablet, and sodium bicarbonate to initiate the dissolution process.
Formulation F8 has a minimum floating lag time of 34 s and a maximum total floating time of 12 h. Amongst all these formulations, the F8 formulation composed of 140:65 ratio of HPMC K4M and NaHCO3 showed 23.56% of drug release at 1 h and 98.29% of drug release was obtained at the end of 12 h, which will meet the required concentration of the drug targeted to the upper part of the GIT, thus was selected for further, studies as an optimized formulation.
Release F8 also found to be best fitted in Higuchi kinetics with RH value of 0.9960, followed by zero-order (RO = 0.921) and first-order (RF = 0.488) kinetics.
This explains that drug release from the Polyherbal floating tablet followed a primarily diffusion-controlled release mechanism. Hence, finally, it can be concluded that the prepared Polyherbal floating gastroretentive tablet of Abrus precatorius (MEAP) and Cordia wallichi (MECW) leaf extracts may prove to be potential candidate for safe and effective controlled drug delivery over an extended period of time for GDDS.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Authors wish to acknowledge the management of Girijananda Chowdhury Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (GIPS) (A unit of Shrimanta Shankar Academy). Guwahati for providing laboratory facilities to carry out the research work.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES:
- Kirtikar KR and Basu BD: Indian Medicinal Plants, Shiva Offset Press. Dehradun 1998; 1674-81.
- Anonymous: Indian Pharmacopoeia. Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Controller of Publication, New Delhi 2007.
- Okhale SE and Nwanosike ME: Abrus precatorius Linn (Fabaceae): phytochemistry, ethnomedicinal uses, ethnopharmacology and pharmacological activities. Inte J of Pharmaceutical Science and Research 2016; 1(6): 37-4.
- Ansary AS, Jyothi Y and Sandur VR: A Comprehensive Review on Antiulcer properties of Herbal drugs. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences 2020; 11(3): 3637-44.
- Sumalatha G and Reddy GJ: Design, development and evaluation of polyherbal floating formulations for gastric ulcer. International Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences 2016; 6(1); 254-61.
- Ashwini I, Deepthi PR, Babu AM and Bakshi V: Development of a prolongd release gastro retentive tablet formulation of levofloxacin. Int J Appl Phar 2015; 7: 7-10.
- Darandale AS: Sustained release dosage form: a concise review. Int J Pharm Drug Anal 2017; 5(5): 153-60.
- Gujral G, Kapoor D and Jaimini M: An update review on modified-release tablets. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics 2018; 8(4): 5-9.
- Saritha: Formulation Design, Development of Gastro Retentive Floating Tablets of Propranolol. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutics 2018; 12(2): 748.
- Hayat Z and Chaudhry MA: Alamgeer Evaluation of a poly-herbal preparationfor the treatment of peptic ulcer. Bangladesh J Pharmacol 2017; 12: 119-24.
- Venkatachalam CV, Sengottian M and Sengodan T: Formulation and evaluation of polyherbal floating effervescence tablet containing Pedalium murex and Tribulus terrestris fruit extracts. Int J Appl Pharm 2017; 9(2): 10-15.
- Ayalasomayajula UL: Enhancement of solubility, preparation and evaluation of immediate release tablets of poorly soluble drug repaglinide. J Global Trends Pharm Sci 2017; 8(3): 4138-13.
- Mishra SK and Gupta MK: Characterization and evaluation of nizatidine floating microspheres based drug delivery system for anti-ulcer activity. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2019; 10(10): 4557-67.
- Kumari B, Pandey P and Dureja H: Formulation and characterization of gastroretentive floating tablets of atorvastatin calcium using central composite design. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 2017; 6(3): 247-56.
How to cite this article:
Sengupta R and Zaveri NM: Design, development and evaluation of polyherbal tablet of two antiulcer herbs. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2021; 12(6): 3291-97. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.12(6).3291-97.
All © 2013 are reserved by the International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
34
3291-3297
737
823
English
IJPSR
R. Sengupta * and N. M. Zaveri
Girijananda Chowdhury Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guwahati, Assam, India.
rupasengupta222@rediffmail.com
08 June 2020
05 November 2020
03 May 2021
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.12(6).3291-97
01 June 2021