DETERMINATION OF ANTI MICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF ESSENTIAL OILS IN DIFFERENT CONCENTRATIONS
HTML Full TextDETERMINATION OF ANTI MICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF ESSENTIAL OILS IN DIFFERENT CONCENTRATIONS
Siddhartha C. Bhatia* and Darshan R. Telange
School of Pharmacy & Technology Management, SVKM’s NMIMS, Babulde, Bank of Tapi River, Mumbai- Agra Road, Shirpur, Dist. Dhule- 425405, Maharashtra, India
ABSTRACT
Preservatives are added to pharmaceuticals to ensure safety and shelf life. A number of Essential oil components are identified as effective antimicrobials. The antimicrobial activity is assessed of pure oils. Oils were evaluated based on Refractive index, Specific gravity and Antimicrobial activity. In present study Syrups were prepared using Peppermint, Rose and Orange oils in different concentrations and antimicrobial activity was determined by using same syrups and compared with antimicrobial activity of pure oils determined by using same concentrations as used in syrups at the end of 7, 14 and 28 days. It was found that pure oils showed higher activity than syrups and only peppermint oil used in concentration of 2% showed antimicrobial activity after 28 days against S. aureus. Syrups containing Rose oil showed activity against E. coli in concentrations of 1% and 2%, against S. aureus only 2% syrup showed activity. All oils were found to be more active against Gram +ve microorganisms than Gram –ve microorganisms.
Keywords:
Essential Oil, Syrup, Antimicrobial Activity, Peppermint Oil, Rose Oil, |
Orange Oil
INTRODUCTION: Food products are perishable by nature and require protection to prevent spoilage during their preparation, storage and distribution to give them desired shelf life. Several techniques such as heating, refrigeration and addition of antimicrobial compounds are being currently used. Within the disposable arsenal of preservation techniques, the food industry investigates more and more the replacement of traditional food preservation techniques by new preservation techniques due to the increased consumer demand for tasty, nutritious, natural and easy-to-handle food products. An increasing number of consumers prefer minimally processed foods, prepared without chemical preservatives. Recent approaches are increasingly directed towards possibilities offered by biological preservation. Originally added to change or improve taste, spices and herbs can also enhance shelf-life because of their antimicrobial nature.
One such possibility is the use of essential oils (EOs) as antimicrobial additives 1-4.
Essential Oils: An essential oil is a concentrated, hydrophobic liquid containing volatile aroma compounds from plants. Essential oils are very complex natural mixtures which can contain about 20–60 components at quite different concentrations. They are characterized by two or three major components at fairly high concentrations (20-70%) compared to others components present in trace amounts. At present, approximately 3000 essential oils are known, 300 of which are commercially important especially for the pharmaceutical, agronomic, food, sanitary, cosmetic and perfume industries. The use of essential oils as antimicrobial agents, there synergistic and antagonistic effects and potential as biological preservatives has been discussed 5-7, 10.
The oils from Mint and Peppermint were found to be more effective against Gram positive bacteria 8. (Leopold et al. 2009). Studies on Antimicrobial activities of different forms of Peppermint viz., aqueous, infusion, decoction, juice and essential oil against 11 different species of Gram-negative bacilli has also been done 9. The aim of present study was to determine antimicrobial activity of essential oils namely Peppermint Oil, Rose Oil and Orange Oil, in different concentrations (0.5%, 1.0%, 2.0%) added to Paracetamol syrup during formulation (Table 3) and testing antimicrobial activity of oil in syrup after 7, 14 and 28 days of preparation by using agar diffusion method and to determine whether any linear relationship is seen or not with increasing concentration of essential oil in syrup formulations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Essential Oils: Oils were obtained from Loba Chemicals. Oils were evaluated based on Refractive Index, Specific Gravity (table 1) and Antimicrobial Activity (table 2).
TABLE 1: PHYSICO- CHEMICAL EVALUATION
Sl. No. | Oil | Color | Odor | Taste | Refractive Index | Specific Gravity | ||
As per USP | Lab | As per USP | Lab | |||||
1 | Peppermint Oil | Light green | Characteristic | Pungent leaving a cooling sensation | 1.459 - 1.465 | 1.33 - 1.35 | 1.459 - 1.465 | 1.54 - 1.59 |
2 | Orange Oil | Yellowish | Characteristic | Characteristic | 1.472 - 1.474 | 1.34 - 1.36 | 1.457 - 1.463 | 1.54 - 1.58 |
3 | Rose Oil | Reddish Yellow | Characteristic | Soothing | 1.457 - 1.463 | 1.33 - 1.35 | 1.472 - 1.474 | 1.53 - 1.59 |
Media: Nutrient agar media was prepared by dissolving 7 gm of Beef extract and 7 gm of peptone separately in water, both were mixed, 3.5 gm of sodium chloride added. Volume made up to 700ml and pH adjusted to 7.2- 7.4. Solution slightly warmed and agar added and autoclaved.
Microorganisms: E. coli (Gm –ve) and S. aureus (Gm +ve) were used in present study.
TABLE 2: ZONE OF INHIBITION FOR PURE OILS
Oil in concentration used in syrups | S. aureus | E. coli |
P1 (0.5%) | 25mm | 23mm |
P2 (1.0%) | 38mm | 36mm |
P3 (2.0%) | 42mm | 38mm |
O1 (0.5%) | 18 mm | 16mm |
O2 (1.0%) | 24mm | 23mm |
O3 (2.0%) | 30mm | 28mm |
R1 (0.5%) | 25mm | 26mm |
R2 (1.0%) | 35mm | 34mm |
R3 (2.0%) | 38mm | 36mm |
General Syrup Preparation Method:
- Prepare a mixture of water, 1, 2 propylene glycol, glycerol and sorbitol.
- Slowly add oil to the above solution.
- Dissolve Kollidon 25 and sodium saccharin in it.
- Slowly add acetaminophen and keep stirring till drug is dissolved.
Evaluation of Syrups: Syrups were evaluated for pH and viscosity
- pH of syrups.
- Viscosity of Syrup without oil: Viscosity of syrup was determined using Brookfield Viscometer using spindle no. 61.
TABLE 3: FORMULA FOR SYRUPS
Ingredients | P 1 (0.5%) | P 2 (1.0%) | P 3 (2.0%) | R 1 (0.5%) | R 2 (1.0%) | R 3
(2.0%) |
O 1 (0.5%) | O 2 (1.0%) | O 3 (2.0%) | Syrup without oil |
Acetaminophen | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Sorbitol | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Sodium Saccharin | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Kollidon 25 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
Glycerol | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 |
1, 2- Propylene Glycol | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
Peppermint Oil | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Rose Oil | - | - | - | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | - |
Orange Oil | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | - |
Water | q.s | q.s | q.s | q.s | q.s | q.s | q.s | q.s | q.s | q.s |
Note: P: Peppermint oil, R: Rose oil, O: Orange oil.
Antimicrobial activity study: To establish antimicrobial activity media above mentioned was added in Petri plates and activity for pure oils and syrups were evaluated by Diffusion method. Pure Oils were diluted with n- Hexane in same concentration as were used in syrups.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Oils were evaluated generally and based on Refractive Index, Specific Gravity and Antimicrobial Activity. Results are shown in Table 1 and 2. It was found that pure oils were more active against Gram +ve microorganisms than Gram –ve microorganisms. Stable syrups were prepared using different Essential oils as shown in Table 3 and Antimicrobial activity of pure oils and Syrups were evaluated. pH of syrups prepared was determined and it was found to increase with time as shown in Table 4(a) and viscosity of plain syrup determined using Brookfield viscometer is shown in Table 4(b).
Out of the 9 syrups prepared only syrup containing Peppermint oil (2%) showed Antimicrobial activity at the end of 28 days against S. aureus. {Shown in Table 5 (a) and (b)} Syrups containing Orange oil did not show any activity against any of the Microorganisms used during the time duration of study. Syrups containing Rose oil in concentrations of 1% and 2% showed activity against E. coli for 14 days and against S. aureus syrup containing 2% oil showed activity.
TABLE 4 (a): PH OF SYRUPS
Syrup | pH at day of preparation | pH at 28 days |
Syrup without oil | 4.30 | 3.92 |
P1 (0.5%) | 4.32 | 4.03 |
P2 (1.0%) | 4.33 | 3.86 |
P3 (2.0%) | 4.50 | 3.88 |
O1 (0.5%) | 4.45 | 4.08 |
O2 (1.0%) | 4.72 | 4.09 |
O3 (2.0%) | 4.80 | 4.21 |
R1 (0.5%) | 4.70 | 3.98 |
R2 (1.0%) | 4.75 | 3.90 |
R3 (2.0%) | 4.82 | 3.85 |
TABLE 4 (b): VISCOSITY OF PLAIN SYRUP
Syrup | RPM | Spindle No. | Viscosity (cps) |
Syrup at day of preparation | 6 | 61 | 366.0 |
Syrup at 28th day | 6 | 61 | 579.6 |
TABLE 5 (a): ZONE OF INHIBITION FOR E. COLI
Syrup | 07 Days | 14 days | 28 days |
Syrup without oil | - | - | - |
P1 (0.5%) | - | - | - |
P2 (1.0%) | - | - | - |
P3 (2.0%) | 16mm | 16mm | - |
O1 (0.5%) | - | - | - |
O2 (1.0%) | - | - | - |
O3 (2.0%) | - | - | - |
R1 (0.5%) | - | - | - |
R2 (1.0%) | 14mm | 14mm | - |
R3 (2.0%) | 16mm | 16mm | - |
TABLE 5 (b): ZONE OF INHIBITION FOR S. AUREUS
Syrup | 07 Days | 14 days | 28 days |
Syrup without oil | - | - | - |
P1 (0.5%) | - | - | - |
P2 (1.0%) | - | - | - |
P3 (2.0%) | 18 mm | 16mm | 14mm |
O1 (0.5%) | - | - | - |
O2 (1.0%) | - | - | - |
O3 (2.0%) | - | - | - |
R1 (0.5%) | - | - | - |
R2 (1.0%) | - | - | - |
R3 (2.0%) | 16mm | 16mm | - |
Images for Zone of Inhibition:
- Peppermint oil syrup (2%) against S. aureus
FIG. 1: 07 DAYS
FIG. 2: 14 DAYS
FIG. 3: 28 DAYS
- Rose oil syrup (2%) against S. aureus
FIG. 4: 07 DAYS
FIG. 5: 14 DAYS
- Peppermint oil syrup (2%) against E. coli
FIG. 6: 07 DAYS
FIG. 7: 14 DAYS
- Rose oil syrup (2%) against E. coli
FIG. 8: 07 DAYS
FIG. 9: 14 DAYS
CONCLUSION: From above study done it can be concluded that Pure Essential oils were found to have Antimicrobial activity against Gm +ve and Gm-ve and there was no proportional increase in Antimicrobial activity with increasing concentration of oils used in syrups.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT: Authors would like to thanks for SVKM’s NMIMS, School of Pharmacy and Technology Management, SPTM Shirpur Campus, (Dist.Dhule), Maharashtra
REFERENCES:
- Iraj Rasooli: Food Preservation – A Biopreservative Approach. Food; 2007; 111- 136.
- Ncube N. S. Assessment techniques of antimicrobial properties of natural compounds of plant origin: current methods and future trends. African Journal of Biotechnology; 2008; 7(12): 1797-1806.
- Bakkali: Biological effects of essential oils – A review. Food and Chemical Toxicology; 2008; 46: 446- 475.
- Marjorie Murphy C. Plant products as antimicrobial Agents. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 12(4): 564-582.
- Roger Dabbah: Antimicrobial action of some citrus fruit oils on selected food borne bacteria; Applied Microbiology; 1970; 19(1): 27-31.
- Anoop Kumar Shee: Studies on the current antibacterial activity potential of commonly used food preservatives. International Journal of Engineering and Technology; 2010; 2(3): 264-269.
- A. Hammer: Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and other plant extracts. Journal of Applied Microbiology; 1999; 86: 985-990.
- Leopold Jirovetz: Antimicrobial activities of essential oils of mint and peppermint as well as some of their main compounds. Journal of Essential oil research; 2009; 21: 365-370.
- Sabaht Saeed: In vitro antibacterial activity of peppermint. Pak. J. Bot., 2006; 38(3): 869-872.
- The United States Pharmacopeia 32, National Formulary 27, The United States Pharmacopoeial Convention, Rockville, MD 20852, Volume-2, Page no. 1795-1796.
Article Information
17
2352-2356
581
1033
English
Ijpsr
Siddhartha C. Bhatia* and Darshan R. Telange
School of Pharmacy & Technology Management, SVKM’s NMIMS, Babulde, Bank of Tapi River, Mumbai- Agra Road, Shirpur, Dist. Dhule- 425405, Maharashtra, India
16 May, 2011
10 June, 2011
14 August, 2011
http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.2(9).2352-56
01 September, 2011