DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF SELF NANO EMULSIFYING DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM FOR TELMISARTAN
HTML Full TextDEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF SELF NANO EMULSIFYING DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM FOR TELMISARTAN
Girish Chandra Soni *1 and S. K. Prajapati 2
Sri Vankateshwara University 1, Meerut - 244236, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Institute of Pharmacy 2, Bundelkhand University, Jhansi - 284128, Uttar Pradesh, India.
ABSTRACT: Self nano-emulsifying system drug delivery system (SNEDDS) is promising for drugs of BCS class II. The objective of present study to develop self nano-emulsifying drug delivery system for Lipophillic drug Telmisartan (antihypertensive drug), labrafil 1944, Kolliphor ELP: Span 80 (1:1) and PEG 400: Ethanol (1:1) was chosen as oil, Surfactant and Co-surfactant as they show higher solubility for Telmisartan. Screening of Surfactant, Co-surfactant done by percent transmittance and were also observed for turbidity or phase separation visually. Pseudo ternary phase diagram were constructed to identify the self emulsifying regions and also to establish the optimum concentration of oil, surfactant and co-surfactant. Box bhenken desine applied for optimization of formulation. Prepared formulation further Characterization done. Percent Drug Content found 99.71, thermodynamic stability studies show homogenous and no phase separation, Emulsifying Study performed transparent appearance after 24 hr, for robustness Dilutability in water and 0.1N HCl give Percentage Transmittance 99.5 and 100, conducting in vitro dissolution test compared with marketed preparation in stimulated gastric (S.G.F) pH 1.2 showed Percent Drug Release 93.98 with in 30 min, compared by pure drug which was 14.26. Particle size found 164.9 nm which is under nano size range, performing Poly Dispersity Index (PDI) 0.228, Zeta Potential found to be -26.0 mV, by using particle size analyzer.TEM study shows uniform spherical nano emulsion droplets. From the present study it is clear that SNEDDS can be formulated to improve the dissolution and oral bioavailability of poorly water soluble drug Telmisartan.
Keywords: |
Telmisartan, Self nano-emulsifying Drug delivery system, Lipophillic, Ternary phase diagram, Bioavailability
INTRODUCTION: Telmisartan is used to treat high blood pressure (hypertension). Lowering high blood pressure helps prevent strokes, heart attacks, and kidney problems. Telmisartan belongs to a class of drugs called angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). It works by relaxing blood vessels so blood can flow more easily 1. Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) classification II, that is, highly permeable and low soluble 2.
Oral route is preferred route of drug administration as facilitates more convenient to drug uptake. It has been estimated that 40 - 70% new chemical entities (NCE) having poor aqueous solubility shows low bioavailability problem is a major hurdle as well as drugs not have dose linearity is a matter to be concerned. Research now a day focus on improving dosage forms design by controlling release rate, enhancing drug solubility or dissolution rate enhancing drug permeability across bio-membrane, enhancing drug stability.
Oral bioavailability of the drugs through gastrointestinal tract depends on the lipophillicity and solubility profile of the drugs. Factor responsible for determination of oral bioavailability are drug stability in gastro intestinal tract, intestinal permeability, resistance to metabolism by cytochrome P450 enzymes present in gut enterocytes and liver hepatocytes and interaction with efflux transport system like p-glycoprotein (p-gp) physiological pathway.
An ideal oral drug delivery system must protect the drug from degradation in the gastrointestinal tract, and deliver the bioactive compounds to the specific area where it is better absorbed 3.
SNEDDS are transparent, thermodynamically stable isotropic concoction of lipid, surfactant, co-surfactant and drug substances that rapidly form oil - in water nanoemulsion when introduced into aqueous media under gentle agitation. The digestive motility of the stomach and intestine provide the agitation necessary for self-emulsification in vivo 4 - 6. The self-emulsification process occurs spontaneously because the free energy required to form the micro nanoemulsion is either low and positive, or negative 7. SNEDDS with globule size ranging between 20 - 200nm are called self micro emulsifying drug delivery system (SMEDDS) 8.
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Materials: Telmisartan was generous gift sample from torrent research center, Bhat, Gandhinagar, Gujrat, India. Labrafil 1944, Transcutol recived as gift sample from gettefosse, Mumbai, Maharashtra India, kolliphour ELP, kolliphour RH40 were received as gift sample from BASF Mumbai, Maharashtra. PEG 400, Span 80, ethanol were brought from Merck India, Mumbai and S. D. fine chem India.
Determination Telmisartan Solubility Study in Various Oils: The solubility of Telmisartan in various solvents was determined by dissolving excess amount of Telmisartan in 1ml of each of the selected solvents in 5ml capacity Stoppard vials separately. Each glass vial was then mixed for 10 min using a vortex mixer. The mixture vials were then kept at 37 ± 1.0 °C in a shaker bath for 72 h to get equilibrium. The equilibrated samples were removed from shaker and centrifuged at 18000 rpm for 30 min. The supernatant was taken and filtered through a 0.45µm membrane filter. The concentration of API was determined in each solvent by UV spectrophotometer by scanning from 200 - 400nm 9. The use of long chain triglycerides (LCT) leads to increased lymphatic transport is used to enhance oral drug bioavailability 10.
Screening of Surfactants: For this study, 150mg of surfactant were added to 150mg of oily phase and then this mixture was heated at 50 °C for homogenization of the components. Then from each prepared mixture, 100mg was withdrawn and diluted to 100ml in a volumetric flask. The ease of emulsification was judged by the number of flask inversions required to yield homogeneous emulsion. The emulsions were allowed to stand for 24 hrs and then % transmittance was evaluated by using UV spectrophotometer 11, 12. They were also observed for turbidity or phase separation visually the surfactant chosen must be able to lower the interfacial tension during the formation of nanoemulsion. Surfactants are amphillic in nature and generally dissolve or solubilize relatively high amount of hydrophobic drug compounds 13. The key step for SNEDDS formulation is to find a suitable oil surfactant mixture that can dissolve the drug within the therapeutic concentration 14 - 16.
Screening of Co-Surfactants: For screening of selected co-surfactants, the oil: surfactant: co-surfactant was taken as 300mg: 200mg: 100mg i.e. in the ratios of 3:2:1. Out of the total 600mg of the mixture 100mg was withdrawn and then added drop wise in a 100ml volumetric flask containing distilled water drop wise; then it was inverted 50-60 times and kept overnight. After which the % transmittance was determined by scanning in the range from 800 - 200nm (wavelength 650nm) using UV - visible spectrophotometer. After the completion of screening the next step was to optimize the combination showing good % transmittance 17.
Ternary Phase Diagram were constructed to identify the self emulsifying regions and also to establish the optimum concentration of oil, surfactant and co-surfactant. Greater the size of nano-emulsion region in phase diagram greater is the self emulsification efficiency.
Phase diagram were constructed using chemix school v.3.51 software and the area of nanoemulsion shaded.
The clarity of the formed aqueous dispersion was visually assessed using the following grading to identify the tested system.
- Denoting the formation of a clear microemulsion.
- Denoting the formation of a translucent microemulsion.
- Represent the formation of a slightly less clear emulsion which had a bluish white appearance.
- Denoting the formation of a bright white emulsion (similar to the appearance of milk).
- Denoting the formation which exhibited either poor emulsification with large oil droplets on the surface or the emulsion was not formed.
Type a and b system are most likely expected to have particle size less than 50nm and referred as a self nano emulsifying drug delivery system (SNEDDS). Phase diagrams involve the plotting the three components surfactant: co-surfactant (Smix), oil and water each of them representing an apex of triangle. Ternary mixtures with varying compositions of the components were formed. For any ternary mixture formed the total of surfactants, co-surfactants and oil concentrations always added to 100%. The required amounts of the three components were weighed accurately. The mixture was then gently heated at 45 - 50 °C and vortex to form homogenous mixture. To this mixture distilled water was added drop by drop until a transparent solution was formed. The surfactant and co-surfactant was varied in mass ratios 1:1, 1:2, 2:1. The different concentration ratios of oil and mixture of surfactant and co surfactant were taken as 0.5:9.5, 0.5:9, 1:9, 1:8, 1:7, 1:6, 1:5, 2:8, 3:7, 4:6 and 5:5 18. Ternary mixtures were formed in these ratios and then quantity of water forming transparent solution was plotted with other components in the pseudo-ternary phase diagram. Surfactant and co-surfactant got preferentially adsorbed at the interface, reducing the interfacial energy as well as providing a mechanical barrier to coalescence then improved the stability of the formulation 19. Co-surfactant could increase interfacial fluidity by penetrating into the surfactant film 20.
Optimization of the Formulation by Box Bhenken Design: In this study Box bhenken Statical Design was used to optimized and evaluate main effects, interaction effects and quadratic effects of the formulation ingredients on the in vitro performance. Seventeen experiments were required for the response surface methodology on this design. The required amount of the three components (Table 1) and Telmisartan (20mg) and 3mg sodium hydroxide were weighed accurately and vortex for 1 minute until Drug Telmisartan was perfectly dissolve followed maintained the pH of formulation. The mixture was then gently heated at 45 - 50 °C and vortex to form homogenous mixture 21, 22. After generating the polynomial equations relating the dependent and independent variables, the process was optimized for the response Y1. Optimization was performed to obtain the levels of X1 - X3 which maximize Y1 at constrained conditions of Y2 through Y3.
TABLE 1: COMPOSITION OF SNEDDS USING BOX BEHNKEN DESIGN
Factor | Name | Units | Low Actual | High Actual |
A | Oil (Labrafil M 1944 CS) | % | 4.61 | 16.75 |
B | Surfactant (Kolliphor ELP: Span 80)(1:1)) | % | 31.07 | 63.78 |
C | Cosurfactant (PEG 400: Ethanol (1:1)) | % | 27.78 | 63.39 |
Quadratic Polynomial Equation:
Y2 = β0+ β1.X1+ β2.X2+ β3.X3- β4.X1.X2- β5.X1.X3- β6.X2.X3- β7.X12+ β8.X22- β9.X32
Preparation of Liquid SNEDDS Formulations: Formulation selected from optimized box bhenken desine for SNEDDS preparations. The required amount of the Telmisartan (20mg) were added in a accurately weighed amount of oil into a screw-capped glass vial and gently heated in a water bath at 45 - 50 oC the surfactant and co-surfactant were added to the oily mixture using pipette and stirred With vortex mixer for homogeneous mixing. The formulation were further sonicated for 15 min and stored at room temperature until further use. Filling the formulation into capsules. Sealing of the body and cap of capsule, either by banding or by microspray sealing 23.
Characterization of Different SNEDDS Formulation: Percentage Drug Content: Process: The drug content evaluation for the selected formulations was done by dissolving weighed amount of drug to the particular formulation. SNEDDS formulation was centrifuged diluted at 18000 rpm for 60 minutes and diluted with methanol. These drug loaded formulations were subjected to assay by analyzing it in UV spectrometer at respective 296nm λmax. The percentage drug content is then calculated by the formula:
% Drug content = Amount of drug in supernatant
Initial amount of drug
Determination of Partition Coefficient: To determine the partition coefficient of the Telmisartan, the shake flask method was used; it is the classical and the most useful method of determination of partition coefficient. Briefly the procedure could be explained as excess amount of API was added in 10ml mixture of n-Octanol and water (1:1). The system was prepared in triplicate and was shaken gently in the separating funnel for 24 hours for achieving equilibrium. Then the two phases were separated and centrifuge at 8000 rpm for 20 minutes. After centrifugation, the concentration of progesterone in both phases was determined by UV spectroscopy and partition coefficient was calculated using the equation.
It can be determined by the formula:
Ko/w = C1/C2
Where, C1 = Conc. of solute in organic phase. C2 = Conc. of solute in aqueous phase.
Ko/w = Partition coefficient
Log P = log (Ko/w)
Thermodynamic Stability Studies: SNEDDS was subjected to thermodynamic stability studies in order to access any phase separation and stability of the prepared formulation 24, 25.
A) Centrifugation Study: The formulation was centrifuged at 18000 rpm for 30min. The resultant formulation was then checked for any instability problem, such as phase separation, creaming, or cracking.
B) Heating and Cooling Cycles: The SNEDDS formulations were subjected to six heating-cooling cycles, between 4 °C and 40 °C, for 48 h. The resultant formulations were assessed for any physical instability like precipitation and phase separation.
C) Freeze - Thaw Cycles: The SNEDDS formulations were subjected to four freeze-thaw cycles between -21 °C and 21 °C. Initially, the formulations were exposed at -21 °C in a deep-freezer for 24 h. Subsequently, the formulations were also thawed at 21 °C for 24 h and kept again in deep-freezer for the next cycle. The formulations were then observed for any physical change(s) such as phase separation and creaming.
Emulsification Study: Visual assessment was performed by drop wise addition of the pre concentrate into 100ml of distilled water. This was done in a glass beaker at room temperature, and the contents were gently stirred on magnetic stirrer. Precipitation was evaluated by visual inspection of the resultant emulsion after 24 hours. The formulations were then categorized as clear (transparent or transparent with bluish tinge), non-clear (turbid), stable (no precipitation at the end of 24 hours), or unstable (showing precipitation within 24 hours) 26.
Dilutability Test Process: The dilutability of the SNEDDS was assessed to know whether these systems would be diluted with the aqueous phase of the system without separation or not. For this purpose, selected and drug-loaded microemulsions were diluted with 900ml Distilled water and their transparency was assessed visually initial and after 24 hr 27.
In vitro Dissolution: Dissolution studies were carried out for all the formulation, employing USP Apparatus 2 and 900mL of simulated gastric fluid (SGF) containing without enzyme pH 1.2, stirred at 75 RPM at a temperature of 37 ± 0.5 °C. An aliquot of sample (5mL) was periodically withdrawn at suitable time intervals. The volume was replaced with an equivalent amount of fresh dissolution medium. The samples, after suitable dilution(s), were analyzed spectrophotometrically at absorption maxima. Dissolution study was also conducted on pure in an analogous manner 28.
Cloud Point Measurement: The formulation was diluted with distilled water in the ratio of 1:100. The diluted samples were placed in a water bath and its temperature was increased gradually. Cloud point was determined as the temperature at which there was a sudden appearance of cloudiness 29, 30.
Determination of Globule Size, Zeta Potential, Polydispersity Index (PDI): Aliquots of the formulation, serially diluted with purified water, were employed to assess the globule size and zeta potential using particle size analyzer (Malvern). Zeta potential measure electric charge at the surface of particles indicates the physical stability of colloidal system it measure by zeta sizer. Each sample suitably diluted with double distilled filtered water and placed in disposable zeta cell. The zeta potential values were assessed by determining the particle electrophoretic mobility. The electrophoretic mobility was converted to the zeta potential via the helmholtz - smoluchowski equation, all measurement perform triplicate. The result expressed as mean ± SD.
Surface Morphology and Structure: Morphology of oil droplets in the emulsion formation was visualized with transmission electron microscope (TEM) (Hitachi, H-7500, Tokyo, Japan), operated at 80 kv ant at 50,000 times magnification. The TEM analysis also performed to visualize any precipitation of the drug upon addition of the aqueous phase. A drop of nanoemulsion after suitable dilution was allowed to deposit directly on the microscope gold coated grid and observed after drying.
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC): DSC is a technique in which the difference in heat flow between the sample and a reference is recorded against temperature. All dynamic DSC studies were carried out on shimandzu thermal analyzer (TA-60 WS). A few milligram of sample, were hermetically sealed into alumunium pans and heated under under nitrogen atmosphere with the heating rate of 10 °C/ min.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
Solubility of Telmisartan (Drug) in Various Solvents Oils: Lipid based compounds forms a possible platform for improving oral bioavailability of drug belonging to BCS class II and IV for formulation of SNEDDS log p value should be high 31, 32. Drug loading capacity of SNEDDS formulations depends on the solubility of drug in the various vehicles of the system which was determined by solubility studies. The use of long chain triglycerides oil which leads to the increased lymphatic transport used to enhance oral bioavailability. The components in the formulation (Fig. 1) of SNEDDS were selected to have maximum solubility for drug along with good miscibility with each other to produce a stable formulation. The solubility of Telmesartan in oil (Fig. 1A) found best in labrafill 1944, oleic acid, and ethyl oleate. In surfactants (Fig. 1B) kolliphour EL, kolliphour RH40, kolliphour ELP, Span 80 and cosurfactant (Fig. 1C) Transcutol HP, PEG - 400, Ethanol, Transcutol P, Glycerol shows good solubility to drug Telmisartan. Thus these oils, surfactants and co-surfactants are selected for further screening.
Oil
Surfactant
Co-surfactant
FIG. 1: SOLUBILITY OF TELMISARTAN (DRUG) IN A) OILS, B) SURFACTANTS, C) CO-SURFACTANTS
Screening of Surfactants and Co-Surfactants:
Screening of Surfactants: Percent transmittance for surfactant (Table 2) was highest in Kolliphor EL+ Span 80 (1:1) 85.33 ± 0.05, Kolliphor RH40+Span 80 (1:1) 81.4 ±0.994, and Kolliphor ELP + Span 80 (1:1) 87.7 ± 0. They were also observed for turbidity or phase separation visually.
TABLE 2: PERCENT TRANSMITTANCE (% T) OBSERVATIONS FOR SURFACTANTS
Oil /
surfactant |
Span 80 | Kolliphor EL | Kolliphor
RH 40 |
Kolliphor
ELP |
Kolliphor EL
+ Span 80 (1:1) |
Kolliphor RH40
+ Span 80 (1:1) |
Kolliphor ELP +Span 80 (1:1) |
Oleic acid | 3.86±0.05 | 4.76±0.15 | 18.1±0.86 | 2.93±0.11 | - | - | - |
Ethyl oleate | 60.33±0.05 | 54.2±0.1 | 13.1±0.1 | 38.36±0.25 | - | - | - |
Labrafill 1944 | 73.83±2.38 | 78.4±0.06 | 80.4±0.17 | 82.36±0.05 | 85.33±0.05 | 81.4±.994 | 87.7±0 |
Screening of Co-Surfactants:
TABLE 3: PERCENT TRANSMITTANCE (% T) OBSERVATION FOR CO-SURFACTANT
S. no | Oil | Surfactant | Co-surfactant | % Transprancy of 24 Hrs |
1 | Labrafill 1944 | Kolliphor RH40 + Span 80 (1:1) | Glycerol | Bluish Transparent |
2 | Labrafill 1944 | Kolliphor RH40 + Span 80 | PEG400 | Bluish Transparent |
3 | Labrafill 1944 | Kolliphor ELP + Span 80(1:1) | Ethanol | Bluish Transparent |
4 | Labrafill 1944 | Kolliphor ELP + Span 80 (2:1) | PEG400 | Bluish Transparent |
5 | Labrafill 1944 | Kolliphor ELP: Span 80 (1:1) | PEG400:Ethanol (1:1) | Transparent |
6 | Labrafill 1944 | Kolliphour ELP: Span 80 (2:1) | PEG400:Ethanol (1:1) | Transparent |
Pseudoternary Phase Diagram: Self-emulsifying systems required very low free energy to form emulsion hence spontaneous formation of an interface between oil droplets and water. On the basis of pseudo ternary phase diagram (Fig. 2) Labrafil 1944 kolliphor ELP: Span 80 (1:1) PEG 400: Ethanol (1:1) has higher area of emulsifying area. Therefore selected combination studied further.
FIG. 2: PSEUDOTERNARY PHASE DIAGRAM
Optimization Through Box Bhenken Desine:
TABLE 4: COMPOSITION OF SNEDDS USING BOX BEHNKEN DESIGN
Factor | Name | Units | Low Actual | High Actual |
A | Oil (Labrafil M 1944 CS) | % | 4.61 | 16.75 |
B | Surfactant (Kolliphor ELP: Span 80) (1:1)) | % | 31.07 | 63.78 |
C | Co-surfactant (PEG 400: Ethanol (1:1)) | % | 27.78 | 63.39 |
3D SURFACE RESPONSE GRAPH BETWEEN OIL (X1), SURFACTANT (X2) WITH % ENTRAPMENT (Y1)
3D SURFACE RESPONSE GRAPH BETWEEN OIL (X1), CO - SURFACTANT (X3) WITH % ENTRAPMENT (Y1)
FIG. 3: 3D SURFACE RESPONSE GRAPH BETWEEN SURFACTANT (X2), CO-SURFACTANT (X3) WITH % ENTRAPMENT (Y1)
TABLE 5: OPTIMIZED CONCENTRATION OF DEPENDENT VARIABLES
Oil (labrafill M ) 1944CS | Surfactant (Kolliphor ELP: SPAN 80) (1:1) | Co-surfactant
(PEG400: ethanol (1:1)) |
Percentage drug content | Formulation
code |
6.78 | 50.09 | 59.65 | 93.217 | A2 |
15.01 | 55.23 | 29.09 | 86.269 | A5 |
16.34 | 40.84 | 44.36 | 97.314 | A8 |
The selected optimized formulations were further evaluated.
Evaluation of Different SNEDDS Formulation:
Percentage Drug Content:
TABLE 6: PERCENTAGE DRUG CONTENT
Number | Oil
(Labrafil M 1944 CS) |
Surfactant
(Kolliphor ELP: Span 80) (1:1)) |
Co-surfactant
(PEG 400: Ethanol (1:1)) |
Percentage
Drug content |
A2 | 6.78 | 50.09 | 59.15 | 96.99352396 |
A5 | 15.01 | 55.23 | 29.09 | 86.26918312 |
A8 | 16.34 | 40.84 | 44.36 | 97.31484378 |
Thermodynamic Stability Studies:
Centrifugation Study:
TABLE 7: CENTRIFUGATION STUDY
Formulation code | Appearance |
A2 | Homogenous, no phase separation |
A5 | Homogenous, no phase separation |
A8 | Homogenous, no phase separation |
Heating and Cooling Cycles: The SNEDDS formulations were subjected to six heating-cooling cycles, between 4 °C and 40 °C, for 48 h. The resultant formulations were assessed for any physical instability like precipitation and phase separation.
Freeze - Thaw Cycles: The SNEDDS formulations were subjected to four freeze-thaw cycles between -21 °C and 21 °C. Initially, the formulations were exposed at -21 °C in a deep-freezer for 24 h. Subsequently, the formulations were also thawed at 21 °C for 24 h and kept again in deep-freezer for the next cycle. The formulations were then observed for any physical change(s) such as phase separation and creaming.
TABLE 8: HEATING COOLING CYCLE AND FREEZE - THAW CYCLE
S. no | Formulation code | Heating and cooling cycles | Freeze-Thaw Cycles |
1 | A5 | Homogenous and no phase separation | Homogenous and no phase separation |
Emulsification Study:
TABLE 9: EMULSIFICATION STUDY
Formulation code | Percentage Transmittance std | Emulsification
time (Seconds) |
Appearance | Appearance
after 24 hr. |
A2 | 98±1.41 | Within 10 seconds | Transparent | Turbid |
A5 | 99.5±0.70 | Within 10 seconds | Transparent | Transparent |
A8 | 97±1.41 | Within 10 seconds | Transparent | Bluish Transparent |
In vitro Dissolution: The samples, after suitable dilution(s), were analyzed spectro-photometrically at absorption maxima 296nm. Dissolution study was also conducted on Marketed tablet Telvas (Telmisartan tablet IP 20mg, Aristo,) in an analogous manner.
TABLE 10: PERCENTAGE DRUG RELEASE OF MARKETED PREPARATION AND SNEDDS FORMULATION A5
Time
(min.) |
Percentage Drug release of
Marketed Preparation Telvas ± Std. |
Percentage Drug release of
Formulation A5 ± Std. |
1 | 0.72±0.04 | 0.86±0.03 |
3 | 1.02±0.06 | 18±1.0 |
5 | 1.36±0.05 | 56.13±0.16 |
8 | 1.83±0.06 | 82.26±1.32 |
10 | 2.07±0.08 | 94.57±0.82 |
15 | 5.82±0.48 | 93.75±0.99 |
20 | 9.87±1.70 | 93.75±1.65 |
25 | 11.48±1.13 | 93.395±2.48 |
30 | 14.26±1.681 | 93.98±0.99 |
FIG. 4: PERCENTAGE DRUG RELEASE OF MARKETED PREPARATION AND FORMULATION A5
From above Fig. 4 it was found that Formulation F5 showed fast drug release as compare to marketed preparation.
Dilutability Test Process: On the basis of above evaluation Parameter (Table 11) Formulation A5 was selected for further evaluation parameter.
TABLE 11: DILUTABILITY TEST PROCESS
In Water 100ml | |||||||
Formulation code | Percentage Transmittance | Emulsification
time (Seconds) |
Appearance | Appearance
after 24 hr |
|||
A2 | Turbid | Within 10 seconds | Turbid | Turbid | |||
A5 | 99.5±0.42 | Within 10 seconds | Transparent | Transparent | |||
A8 | 65.45±4.31 | Within 10 seconds | Bluish Transparent | Bluish Transparent | |||
In 0.1N HCl 100ml | |||||||
Formulation code | Percentage Transmittance | Emulsification time (Seconds) | Appearance | Appearance after 24 hr | |||
A2 | Turbid | Within 10 seconds | Turbid | Turbid | |||
A5 | 100±0.14 | Within 10 seconds | Transparent | Transparent | |||
A8 | 98.4±0.42 | Within 10 seconds | Bluish Transparent | Bluish Transparent | |||
In Water 900ml | |||||||
Formulation code | Percentage Transmittance | Emulsification time (Seconds) | Appearance | Appearance after 24 hr | |||
A2 | Turbid | Within 10 seconds | Turbid | Turbid | |||
A5 | 95.25±3.18 | Within 10 seconds | Transparent | Transparent | |||
A8 | 93.8±1.27 | Within 10 seconds | Bluish Transparent | Bluish Transparent | |||
In 0.1 N HCl 900ml | |||||||
Formulation code | Percentage Transmittance | Emulsification time (Seconds) | Appearance | Appearance after 24 hr | |||
A2 | Turbid | Within 10 seconds | Turbid | Turbid | |||
A5 | 100.05±0.212 | Within 10 seconds | Transparent | Transparent | |||
A8 | 99.7±0.28 | Within 10 seconds | Bluish Transparent | Bluish Transparent | |||
Cloud Point Measurement: The cloud point (Table 12) of A5 SNEDDS was found to be 62.65 ± 1.42 indicating the formed nanoemulsion at the physiological temperature will be a stable one.
TABLE 12: CLOUD POINT MEASUREMENT OF DRUG CONTAINING SNEDDS
S. no. | Formulation Code | Cloud Point |
1 | A5 | 62.65±1.42 |
Determination of Globule Size, Zeta Potential and Poly Dispersity Index:
TABLE 13: FORMULATION A5 PARTICLE SIZE, PDI, ZETA POTENTIAL
S. no. | Formulation Code | Particle Size (nm) | PDI | Zeta Potential (mV) |
1 | A5 | 164.9 | 0.228 | -26.0 |
FIG. 5: GRAPH OF PARTICLE SIZE OF A5 FORMULATION
FIG. 6: GRAPH OF ZETA POTENTIAL OF A5 FORMULATION Tem Images of A5 Drug Loaded SNEDDS Formulation: From TEM images Fig. 7 of formulation showed uniform spherical nanoemulsion droplets. Thermodynamic stability study.
FIG. 7: TEM IMAGES OF A5 DRUG LOADED SNEDDS FORMULATION
FTIR Study: The FTIR spectrum (Fig. 8) of physical mixture and optimized formulation displayed peaks of drug with some minor displacements. FT-IR analysis of optimized formulation and the drug were studied for the interaction of the excipient and the drug in the final formulation. Telmisartan has characteristic absorption peaks (Table 14) C-H at 3022.64cm-1, carboxylic acid at 1702 cm-1, C-C at 1571.55 cm-1, 1, 2- distributed benzene ring vibration at 749.73cm-1.
Similar peaks were observed in spectra of different combinations of excipient and in optimized formulation (SNEDDS), along with interfering peaks indicating there is no unwanted reaction between Telmisartan and other excipient used in the study. From the figure and table it can be inferred that there is no unwanted reaction between Telmisartan and other excipient used in the study. From the figure and table it can be inferred that there was no appearance or disappearance of any characteristic peaks. This shows that there was no interaction between the drug and the excipient used in the SNEDDS preparation.
Partition Coefficient: The partition coefficient of drug is 3.01 ± 1.68. So the drug is lipophillic in nature.
A) FTIR SPECTRA OF TELMISARTAN DRUG
B) FTIR SPECTRA OF LABRAFIL OIL
C) FTIR SPECTRA OF PHYSICAL MIXTURE OF DRUG, OIL, SURFACTANT AND COSURFACTANT
D) FTIR SPECTRA OF OPTIMIZED FORMULATION A5
FIG. 8: FTIR SPECTRA OF A) TELMISARTAN DRUG B) LABRAFIL OIL C) PHYSICAL MIXTURE OIL, SURFACTANT CO-SURFACTANT D) OPTIMIZED FORMULATION A5
TABLE 14: FTIR OF DRUG, PHYSICAL MIXTURE AND FORMULATION A5
S. no. | Functional
group |
Observed peak
(cm-1 ) in Drug |
Observed peak (cm-1 ) of Drug in Physical mixture | Observed peak (cm-1 ) of drug in formulation A5 |
1 | Aromatic C- H stretch | 3022.64 | - | - |
2 | Carboxylic acid | 1702 | - | - |
3 | Aromatic C - C bending and stretching | 1571.55 | 1562.53 | 1579.22 |
4 | 1, 2-disubstituted
benzene ring vibrations |
749.73 | 723.15 | 723.96 |
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC): From above DSC thermogram Melting point of drug Telmisartan was found to be 267.4 - 274 °C. No exothermic peaks were found in the optimized formulations indicating that Telmisartan must be molecularly dissolved in an amorphous state in the formulation.
(A)
(B)
(C)
FIG. 9: DSC THERMOGRAM A) DRUG TELMISARTAN B) PHYSICAL MIXTURE DRUG OIL SURFACTANT C) FORMULATION A5
CONCLUSION: Result suggested that self nano emulsifying drug delivery system (SNEDDS) of temisartan may be prepared by using appropriate oil, in proper ratio and kind of surfactant and co-surfactant within the desired particle size range, the amount of drug released that could increased the bioavailability of Telmisartan.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The author is thankful to torrent research center, Bhat, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India for providing Temisartan gettefosse, Mumbai, Maharashtra India, BASF Mumbai, Maharashtra, India for their kind gift samples.
DECLARATION OF INTEREST: The author reports no declaration of interest.
REFERENCES:
- Martindale: complete drug reference 38th edition 979.
- Kohli K, Chopra S, Dhar D, Arora S and Khar RK: Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems: an approach to enhance oral bioavailability. Drug discovery today 2010; 15: 958-65.
- Roberties DES, Bonferoni MC et al.: Adv in oral controlled drug delivery: the role of drug. Polymer and inter polymer non covalent interactions. Expert opinion on drug delivery 2015; 12: 441-53.
- Pouton CW and Charman WN: Oily formulations for administration to the gastrointestinal tract. Adv drug del rev 1997; 25: 1-128.
- Gershanik T and Benita S: Eur. J. Pharm Biopharm. 2000; 50: 179-188.
- Humberstone AJ and Charman WN: Adv Drug Delv. Rev., 1997; 25: 103-128.
- Constantinides PP: Pharm. Res., 1995; 12: 1561-1572.
- Porter CJH, Pouton CW, Cuine JF and Charman WN: Enhancing intestinal drug solubilisation using lipid- based delivery systems. Adv drug delivery rev. 2008; 60: 673-91.
- Weiwei Z, Aihua Y, Weihong W, Ruigian D, Jun W and Guangaxi Z: Formulation design of microemulsion for dermal delivery of Penciclovir, International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2008; 360: 184-190.
- Gupta S, Chavhan S and Sawant KK: Self- Nano-emulsifying drug delivery system for Adefovir Dipivoxil: design, characterisation, in vitro and ex vivo Colloids Surf. a Physiochem. Eng. ASP. 2011; 392: 145-155.
- Konga KB, Lee SJ, Chona KS, Jeong YS, Yak N and Skanga G: Development of self microemulsifying drug delivery system for oral bioavailability enhancement of Simvastatin in beagle dogs Int. J. Pharm 2004; 274: 6573.
- Date AA and Nagarsenker MS: AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 2008; 9: 138.
- Aungst BJ: Intestinal Permeation Enhancers. J Pharm Sci 2000; 89: 429‐
- Franceschinis C, Bortoletto B, Perissutti M, Dal Z, Voinovich D and Realdon N: “Self-Emulsifying pellets in a lab-scale high shear mixer: formulation and production design,” powder technology 2011; 207(1–3): 113–118.
- Subramanian N, Ray S, Ghosal S, Bhandra R, Moulik SP: Formulation design of Self- Microemulsifying drug delivery systems for improvement oral bioavailability of Celecoxib, Bio Pharm, Bull. 2004; 27(12): 1993-1999.
- Constantinides PP: lipid microencapsulations for improving drug dissolution and oral absorption: physical and biopharmaceutical aspects. Pharm Res 1995; 12: 1561-72.
- Yot SW, Sontaya LV, Jurairat NH and Pornsak S: Self nanoemulsifying drug delivery system of nifidipine: impact of hydrophilic-lipophillic balance and molecular structure of mixed surfactants. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 2014; 15(2).
- Huabing C, Xueling C, Danrong D, Jin L, Huibi X and Xiangling Y: Microemulsion- based hydrogel formulation of ibuprofen for topical delivery, International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2006; 315: 52-58.
- Reiss H: Entropy-induced dispersion of bulk liquids. Journal of colloid and interface science 1975; 53: 61-70.
- Constantinides and Scalar: Formulation and Physical characterization of water in oil microemulsions containing long versus medium chain length glycerides. Int. J. Pharma 1997; 158: 57-68.
- Muhammad N, Nitar U, Jawad K, Ayesha S and Zarqa N: Development and Optimization of microemulsion formulation using box bhenken designs for enhanced transdermal delivery of lornoxicam, lat. Am J. Pharm, 2013; 32(8): 1196-204.
- Shantanu B, Katare OP and Bhupinder S: Optimized self nano emulsifying systems of ezetimibe with enhanced bioavailability potential using long chain and medium chain triglycerides, colloids and surfactants: Biointerfaces 2012; 100: 50-61.
- Janin V, Musakhanian J and Marchaud D: Approaches for the development of solid and semi solid lipid-based formulations. Adv drug delivery rev 2008; 60: 734-746.
- Shakeel F, Haq N, El-badry M, Alanazi FK and Alsarra IAM: Ultra fine super self nano emulsifying drug delivery system (SNEDDS) enhanced solubility and dissolution of Idomethacin J. Mol. Liq. 2013; 180: 89-94.
- Ratiman MA, Iqubal Z and Hussain ZA: Formation optimization and in vitro characterization of sertraline loaded self nano emulsifying drug dlivery system (SNEDDS) for oral administration, J. Pharm. Invest 2012; 42: 191-201 .
- Pouton CW: Formulation of self emulsifying drug delivery system. Adv drug deliv rev 1997; 25: 47-58.
- Mehta SK, Gurpreet K and Bhasin KK: Analysis of Tween based microemulsion in the presence of TB drug rifampicin, colloids and surface B: Biointerfaces 2007; 60: 95-104.
- Singh B, Singh R, Bandyopadhyaya S, Kapila R and Garg B: Optimized nano emulsifying systems with enhanced bioavailability of carvedilol colloids and surfaces: Biointerfaces 2013; 101: 465-474.
- Elnaggar YSR, El-Massik MA and Abdallah OY: Self emulsifying drug delivery systems of tamoxifen citrate: desine and optimization. Int. J pharm 2009; 380: 133-41.
- Gupta S, Chavhan S and Sawant KK: Self nano emulsifying drug delivery system for adefovir dipivoxil: desine, characterization, in vitro and ex vivo evaluation, colloids surf. a physic-chem. Eng asp, 2011; 392: 145-155.
- Bora DK, Priyanka B and Kiran B: Formulation and Evaluation of self microemulsifying drug delivery systems of low solubility drug for enhanced solubility and dissolution, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation. 1-19
- Kanga KB, Lee SJ, Chona KS, Jeong YS, Yuk HS and Khamga G: Development of self microemulsifying drug delivery systems for oral bioavailability enhancement of Simvastatin in beagle dogs Int. J Pharma 2004; 274: 6573.
How to cite this article:
Soni GC and Prajapati SK: Development and evaluation of self nano emulsifying drug delivery system for Telmisartan. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2017; 8(9): 3948-61.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.8(9).3948-61.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.