DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF HPTLC METHOD FOR ESTIMATION OF CARBAMAZEPINE IN BULK DRUG AND FORMULATIONS
HTML Full TextDEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF HPTLC METHOD FOR ESTIMATION OF CARBAMAZEPINE IN BULK DRUG AND FORMULATIONS
S. B. Patil * 1 and R. Y. Chaudhari 2
DCS’s Annasaheb Ramesh Amerax College of Pharmacy 1, Nagaon, Dhule - 424005, Maharashtra, India.
TVES’s Hon L.M.C. College of Pharmacy 2, Faizpur, Jalgaon - 425503, Maharashtra, India.
ABSTRACT: A new, simple, and rapid high-performance thin-layer chromatographic method was developed and validated for quantitative determination of Carbamazepine. Carbamazepine was chromatographed on silica gel 60 F254 TLC plate using Ethyl acetate: Methanol (9: 1 v/v) as mobile phase. Carbamazepine was quantified by densitometric analysis at 239 nm. The method was found to give compact spots for the drug. The linear regression analysis data for the calibration plots showed good linear relationship in the concentration range 100 - 600 ng/spot. The method was validated for precision, recovery, accuracy, and robustness as per the International Conference on Harmonization guidelines. The minimum detectable amount was found to be 15.096 ng/spot, whereas the limit of quantitation was found to be 45.696 ng/spot. Statistical analysis of the data showed that the method is precise, accurate, reproducible, and selective for the analysis of Carbamazepine. The method was successfully employed for the estimation of equilibrium solubility, quantification of Carbamazepine as a bulk drug, in commercially available preparation.
Keywords: |
Carbamazepine, HPTLC, Methanol, Bulk drug, Formulations
INTRODUCTION: Carbamazepine (CBZ), 5-H-Dibenz [b.f] azepine-5-carboxomide, is widely prescribed as an for schizophrenia and schizoaffective psychoses and anticonvulsant, antiepileptic drug. Various methods have been reported for the determination of CBZ in pharmaceutical preparations including spectro-photometric methods, spectrofluorimetry method, gas-liquid chromatography (GC), FTIR, planar chromatography, and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Most of the methods reported are highly sophisticated, costly, and time consuming and require special sample preparation.
So simple method for the determination of carbamazepine using high performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) with ultraviolet absorbance detection (UV) was developed. The method was validated successfully for the determination of carbamazepine and found simple, rapid, and highly sensitive and it could be reliable for pharmacokinetic studies in humans 1.
FIG. 1: CARBAMAZEPINE
Experimental: 2-6
Apparatus: The HPTLC system (Hamilton, Bonaduz, Switzerland) consisted of CAMAG Linomat5 sample applicator (Switzerland) connected to a nitrogen cylinder, a twin trough glass chamber (CAMAG, Muttenz, Switzerland) (10 × 10 cm), a derivatization chamber, and a plate heater. Pre coated silica gel aluminum plate 60 F254 TLC plates (10 × 10 cm, layer thickness 250 µm (E. Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was used as stationary phase. TLC plates were prewashed twice with10mL of methanol and activated at 80 ºC for 5min prior to sample application. Densitometric analysis was carried out using a CAMAG TLC scanner at 239 nm with win CATS software version 1.4.2. The source of radiation utilized was deuterium lamp emitting a continuous UV spectrum between 200 to 400 nm.
Reagents and Materials: Carbamazepine pure powder was obtained. Tablet formulation, Carbatol 200 (Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd., India) was obtained commercially were weighed and powdered. Methanol, ethyl acetate, distilled water was used throughout the study. All other chemicals and solvents were of analytical reagent grade.
HPTLC Method and Chromatographic Conditions:
Sample Application: The standard and formulation samples of CBZ were spotted on Precoated TLC plates in the form of narrow bands of lengths 6 mm, with 10 mm distance between two bands. Samples were applied under continuous drying stream of nitrogen gas.
Mobile Phase and Migration: Plates were developed using mobile phase consisting of Ethyl acetate: Methanol (9: 1 v/v). Linear ascending development was carried out in 10 cm × 10 cm twin trough glass chamber equilibrated with mobile phase. The optimized chamber saturation time for mobile phase was 20 min. The length of chromatogram run was 9 cm and development time was approximately 20 min.
After development, the TLC plates were dried completely.
Chromatogram and System Suitability Parameters of Drug: Under the optimized chromatographic conditions 200 ng/band of Carbamazepine was applied on TLC plate and the retention factor of repeated applications was found to be Carbamazepine = 0.78 ± 0.0052.
S. no. | Rf |
1 | 0.78 |
2 | 0.77 |
3 | 0.78 |
4 | 0.77 |
5 | 0.78 |
7 | 0.78 |
AVG | 0.78 |
ST. DEV | 0.0052 |
% RSD | 0.6649 |
Carbamazepine = 0.78 ± 0.0052
Densitometric Analysis and Quantitation Procedure: Densitometric analysis was carried out using a CAMAG TLC scanner at 239 nm with win CATS software version 1.4.2. The source of radiation utilized was deuterium lamp emitting a continuous UV spectrum between 200 to 400 nm. The spots were analyzed at a wavelength of 239 nm. The slit dimensions used in the analysis were length and width of 5 mm and 0.45 mm, respectively, with a scanning rate of 20 mm/s.
Preparation of CBZ Standard Stock Solution: Standard stock solution of Carbamazepine was prepared by dissolving 10 mg of drug in 10 ml of Methanol to get concentration of 1000 µg/ml. From the standard stock solution, 1 ml was further diluted to 10 ml with mobile phase to get 100 µg/ml solution of Carbamazepine.
Preparation of Sample Solution (Assay): Twenty tablets [Carbatol 200; Torrent Pharmaceuticals] were weighed and powdered. Tablet powder containing Carbamazepine equivalent to 10 mg of Carbamazepine was weighed and transferred to 10 ml volumetric flask and was diluted with Methanol. It was sonicated for 10 min. and filtered so as to get solution having concentration 1000 µg/ml. 1 ml of this solution was further diluted with methanol to get the final concentration 100 µg/ml of Carbamazepine. 2 µl volume of resulting solution was applied on TLC plate and developed under optimized chromatographic condition six determinations were carried out from homogenous sample to determine % assay Table 1.
Selection of Wavelength: From the standard stock solution further dilutions were done using mobile phase and scanned over the range of 200 - 400 nm and the spectrum was obtained. It was observed that Carbamazepine showed considerable absorbance at 284 nm Fig. 2.
Method Validation: Validation of the developed HPTLC method was carried out as per the ICH Q2 (R1) guidelines for specificity, accuracy, precision, repeatability, and robustness.
Specificity: The specificity of the method was ascertained by peak purity profiling studies. The peak purity values were found to be more than 0.995, indicating the no interference of any other peak of degradation product, impurity or matrix.
Sensitivity: Sensitivity of the method was determined with respect to limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ).
Linearity and Calibration Curve: From the standard stock solution (1000 µg/ml) of Carbamazepine further dilutions was made with methanol to get solution having concentration 100 µg/ml [100 ng/µl] Different volumes were applied on TLC plate to obtain linear range. Six replicates per concentration were applied. The linearity (relationship between peak area and concentration) was determined over the concentration range 100-600 ng/band. The results obtained are shown in Table 2. The peak area was plotted against the corresponding concentrations to obtain the calibration curve as shown in Fig. 3.
Accuracy: To check accuracy of the method, recovery studies were carried out by adding standard drug to sample at three different levels 50, 100 and 150%. Basic concentration of sample chosen was 200 ng/band of Carbamazepine from tablet solution. These solutions were applied under optimized chromatographic conditions in triplicate to obtain the chromatograms. The drug concentrations of Carbamazepine were calculated by using linearity equation of Carbamazepine. The results obtained are shown in Table 3.
Precision: The precision of the method was demonstrated by Intra-day and Inter-day variation studies. In the Intraday studies, 3 replicates of 3 different concentrations (200, 400, 600 ng/band) of Carbamazepine were analysed in a day and percentage RSD was calculated. For the inter day variation studies, 3 replicates of different concentrations were analysed on 3 consecutive days and percentage RSD were calculated. The results obtained for Intraday and Inter day variations are shown in Table 4 and 5.
Robustness: Robustness of the method was determined by carrying out the analysis under conditions during which mobile phase composition, chamber saturation period were altered and the effects on the area were noted. The results obtained are shown in Table 6.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
FIG. 1: CHROMATOGRAM OF STANDARD CARBAMAZEPINE (400 ng/band)
Selection of Wavelength: The spectra of carbamazepine in methanol showed absorption at 284 nm shown in Fig. 2, which is complying with reported λmax. Hence, it was selected as λmax of carbamazepine in methanol for further use.
FIG. 2: UV SPECTRA OF CARBAMAZEPINE (10 µg/ml)
Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantification (LOQ):
LOD is calculated from the formula:
LOD = 3.3 σ / S
Where, σ = standard deviation of response for the lowest conc. in the range
S = slope of the calibration curve.
LOD of Carbamazepine = 15.079 ng/band
The quantitation limit is expressed as:
LOQ = 10 σ / S
Where, σ = standard deviation of response for the lowest conc. in the range
S = slope of the calibration curve.
LOQ of Carbamazepine = 45.696 ng/band
Assay: The observed assay for commercially available tablets Carbatol 200 (Torrent Pharmaceuticals) was performed and % RSD were calculated which summarized in Table 1.
TABLE 1: ASSAY OF MARKETED FORMULATION
S. no. | Area | Concentration
(ng/band) |
% Recovery | % Recovery
Mean ± SD |
% RSD |
1 | 5663 | 200.71 | 100.355 | 100.503
± 0.947 |
0.942
|
2 | 5638 | 199.324 | 99.662 | ||
3 | 5703 | 202.927 | 101.464 | ||
4 | 5640 | 199.435 | 99.717 | ||
5 | 5718 | 203.759 | 101.879 | ||
7 | 5648 | 199.878 | 99.939 |
Linearity and Range: The linearity for the developed method was investigated by replicate analysis (n=7) at six concentration levels (100-600 ng/band). Method was found to be linearin a concentration range of 100–600 ng/band (n = 6), with respect to peak area. The linearity was shown in Table 2 and Fig. 3.
Accuracy: The accuracy was determined in triplicate by analyzing % recovery of carbamazepine by standard addition method. The percent recovery obtained indicates non-interference from the excipients used in the formulation. The results were shown in Table 3.
Precision: The precision of proposed method was determined by Intra-day and Inter-day precision, and it was expressed in terms of percent relative standard deviation (% RSD). For Inter-day and Intra-day % RSD were found in the range of 0.3088 and 0.4287 respectively as shown in Table 4 and 5.
FIG. 3: CALIBRATION CURVE FOR CARBAMAZEPINE
TABLE 2: LINEARITY STUDY OF CARBAMAZEPINE
Replicates | Concentrations of Carbamazepine | |||||
100 ng/band | 200 ng/band | 300 ng/band | 400 ng/band | 500 ng/band | 600 ng/band | |
Peak Area | ||||||
1 | 3825 | 5719 | 7517 | 9145 | 11183 | 12828 |
2 | 3709 | 5708 | 7507 | 9131 | 11154 | 12809 |
3 | 3718 | 5735 | 7522 | 9134 | 11179 | 12837 |
4 | 3817 | 5757 | 7590 | 9104 | 11175 | 12772 |
5 | 3741 | 5707 | 7428 | 9122 | 11207 | 12815 |
7 | 3818 | 5727 | 7777 | 9242 | 11128 | 12737 |
Mean | 3771.1 | 5708.7 | 7539.7 | 9146.3 | 11171 | 12799.3 |
Std. Dev. | 52.97 | 52.48 | 84.37 | 48.83 | 27.08 | 38.11 |
%RSD | 0.014 | 0.0091 | 0.0119 | 0.0053 | 0.00242 | 0.00298 |
TABLE 3: RECOVERY STUDY OF CARBAMAZEPINE
Level | Conc. (ng/band) | Area | Mean | Amount recovered
(ng/band) |
% Recovery | |
Sample | Std | |||||
50% | 200 | 100 | 7549 | 7493 | 298.17 | 100.72 |
7418 | ||||||
7512 | ||||||
100% | 200 | 200 | 9187 | 9214 | 402.97 | 99.40 |
9247 | ||||||
9210 | ||||||
150% | 200 | 300 | 11075 | 11122 | 498.80 | 100.67 |
11184 | ||||||
11109 |
TABLE 4: INTRA-DAY PRECISION STUDY CARBAMAZEPINE
Concentration (ng/band) | Area (µV. Sec) | % Recovery ± SD | Mean % Recovery* ± SD | % RSD* |
200 | 5719 |
101.95 ± 0.37 |
100.37 ± 0.31 | 0.3088 |
200 | 5708 | |||
200 | 5735 | |||
400 | 9245 |
99.62 ± 0.31 |
||
400 | 9204 | |||
400 | 9242 | |||
600 | 12828 |
99.44 ± 0.27 |
||
600 | 12772 | |||
600 | 12815 |
TABLE 5: INTER-DAY PRECISION STUDY CARBAMAZEPINE
Concentration (ng/band) | Area (µV. Sec) | % Recovery ± SD | Mean % Recovery* ± SD | % RSD* |
200 | 5708 |
101.87 ± 0.25 |
100.29 ± 0.47 | 0.4287 |
200 | 5726 | |||
200 | 5719 | |||
400 | 9134 |
99.43 ± 1.02 |
||
400 | 9242 | |||
400 | 9276 | |||
600 | 12815 |
99.58 ± 0.13 |
||
600 | 12837 | |||
600 | 12809 |
*Average of three determinations
Robustness: The standard deviation of peak areas was calculated for each parameter and % RSD was found to be less than 2% Table 6.
System Suitability Parameters: System suitability parameters of Carbamazepine are summarised below in Table 7.
TABLE 6: ROBUSTNESS STUDY
S. no. | Parameters | Variation | Concentration (ng/band) | % RSD |
1 | Saturation Time | 15 min ± 10 % | 200 | 0.24 |
400 | 0.08 | |||
500 | 0.14 | |||
2 | Time from application to development | (0, 30, 60, 90 min.) | 200 | 1.16 |
400 | 0.15 | |||
500 | 0.19 | |||
3 | Time from development to scanning | (0, 30, 60, 90 min.) | 200 | 0.29 |
400 | 0.65 | |||
500 | 0.23 | |||
4 | Scanning wavelength | 284 ± 2 nm | 200 | 1.39 |
400 | 0.82 | |||
500 | 0.36 |
TABLE 7: SYSTEM SUITABILITY PARAMETERS
Name | Rf | Concentration (ng/band) | Area | Asymmetry |
Carbamazepine | 0.78 ± 0.005 | 200 | 5735 | 1.20 |
Summary of Validation Study: The summary of validation parameters are summarised in Table 8.
TABLE 8: SUMMARY OF VALIDATION STUDY
S. no. | Validation Parameter | Result |
1 | Linearity | Y = 18.038x + 2042.7 R2 = 0.9992 |
2 | Range | 100-600 ng/band |
3 | Assay | 100.503 ± 0.947 |
4 |
Precision | (%RSD) |
A) Intraday precision | 0.3088 | |
A) Interday precision | 0.4287 | |
5 |
Accuracy | % Recovery |
50% | 100.72 | |
100% | 99.40 | |
150% | 100.67 | |
6 | LOD | 15.079 ng/band |
7 | LOQ | 45.696 ng/band |
8 | Specificity | Specific |
9 | Robustness | Robust |
CONCLUSION: A new HPTLC method has been developed for the identification and quantification of CBZ. Low cost, faster speed, and satisfactory precision and accuracy are the main features of this method. Method was successfully validated as per ICH guidelines and statistical analysis proves that method is sensitive, specific, and repeatable. It can be conveniently employed for routine quality control analysis of CBZ as bulk drug in marketed tablets.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT: The authors thankful to the authorities of LMC TVES’s College of Pharmacy, Faizpur, Jalgaon, for providing support and necessary facility to the research work.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have no any conflict of interest.
REFERENCES:
- Patel RB, Patel MR, Bhatt KK and Patel BG: Development and Validation of HPTLC method for estimation of carbamazepine in formulations and its in-vitro release study; 2011, Chromatography Research International 2011; 8: 1-8.
- Sutar PM, Bansode DA and Dhaneshwar SS: Development of validated HPTLC method for densitometric estimation of lacosamide in bulk drug and tablet dosage form, Der Chemica Sinica 2016; 7(3): 30-37.
- Patil KM and Bodhankar SL: Validated High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography method for simultaneous estimation of phenytoin sodium, phenobarbitone sodium and carbamazepine in tablet dosage forms. Indian J Pharm Sci 2005; 6(3): 351-355.
- Ezzeldin E, Shahat AA and Basudan OA: Development and validation of an HPLC method for the determination of carbamazepine in human. Life Science Journal 2013; 10(4): 2159-2163.
- Zadbuke N, Shahi S, Jadhav A and Borde S: Development and validation of UV-Visible spectroscopic method for estimation of carbamazepine in bulk and tablet dosage form. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2016; 8(2): 234-238.
- El-Sheikh R, Gouda AA, Hassan WS, Heshamhashem and Kandiel MF: Development and Validation of a Rapid Stability Indicating HPLC Method for Determination of Carbamazepine in Pure and Dosage Forms, Chemical Science Transactions 2016; 5(4): 1026-1034.
- Tambe H and Mulgund SV: UV Spectrophotometric estimation of carbamazepine in bulk and tablet dosage form using area under curve method, World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2015; 4(5): 1200-1206.
- Mowafy HA, Alanazi FK, Gamal ME and Maghraby: Development and validation of an HPLC–UV method for the quantification of carbamazepine in rabbit plasma, Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal 2012; 20: 29-34.
- Pania NR, Nath NL and Singh AV: Development and validation of analytical method for the estimation of Nateglinide in rabbit plasma, Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis 2012; 2(6): 492-498.
How to cite this article:
Patil SB and Chaudhari RY: Development and validation of HPTLC method for estimation of carbamazepine in bulk drug and formulations. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2018; 9(8): 3561-66. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(8).3561-66.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
60
3561-3566
405
931
English
IJPSR
S. B. Patil * and R. Y. Chaudhari
DCS’s Annasaheb Ramesh Amerax College of Pharmacy, Nagaon, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.
shaileshbpatil2925@gmail.com
31 May, 2018
26 July, 2018
28 July, 2018
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(8).3561-66
01 August, 2018