DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF NITECAPONE IN HUMAN PLASMA USING TOLCAPONE AS INTERNAL STANDARD BY LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY-TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY
HTML Full TextDEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF NITECAPONE IN HUMAN PLASMA USING TOLCAPONE AS INTERNAL STANDARD BY LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY-TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY
Aswini Kumar Parida * 1, K. Srinivasa Rao 2 and Ajay Kumar Patnaik 3
S. P. E. R. 1, Berhampur University, Berhampur - 760007, Odisha, India.
Department of Pharmacy 2, Indira Gandhi National Tribal University, Amarkantak - 484887, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Department of Chemistry 3, Ravenshaw University, Cuttack - 753003, Odisha, India.
ABSTRACT: The present LC-MS/MS method for estimation of Nitecapone in human plasma using Tolcapone as an internal standard is established and validated as per FDA guidelines. A good response was obtained with ZORBAX Eclipse plus C18 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm ID, 5 μm) and mobile phase with a mixture of 0.01 M Ammonium phosphate buffer with pH adjusted to 5.0 with OPA and Acetonitrile (70:30, v/v) at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min by positive ion mode (API 4000) with an injection volume of 20 µL and a run time of 3.0 min. Detection is performed by atmospheric pressure electrospray ionization (ESI) tandem mass spectrometry in positive ion mode. The precursor to product ion transitions is m/z 266.20 to 156.20 for Nitecapone and m/z 274.20 to 183.10 for Tolcapone (Internal standard) were used for quantization. The retention time of Nitecapone and Tolcapone (Internal standard) were found to be 2.12 min and 2.58 min, respectively. Linearity established for Nitecapone in the range of 50 ng/mL to 2000 ng/mL with correlation coefficient (r = 0.9997), and the overall percentage recovery was 90.39 % for Nitecapone and 92.34 % for Tolcapone (Internal standard) respectively. The CV % values of accuracy and precision for Nitecapone were found to be ≤ 15%, which indicates the accuracy and precision of the proposed method. This method is suitable for routine therapeutic drug monitoring of Nitecapone.
Keywords: |
Nitecapone, Tolcapone, COMT inhibitors, LC-MS/MS, ESI, FDA guideline, Bioanalysis
INTRODUCTION: The literature review reveals that very few LC methods were reported for the estimation of Nitecapone individually and combined with other drugs at the time of commencement of work. However, there are very few LC-MS/MS methods were reported for the estimation of Nitecapone in human plasma, and the HPLC methods available are with long runtime, hence time-consuming.
Upon literature survey 1-6, very few LC-MS/MS methods have been reported for the determination of Nitecapone and Tolcapone. To the best of our knowledge, the simultaneous determination of Nitecapone and Tolcapone in human plasma has not been reported.
Objective of the Research Work: Hence, in the present study, an attempt has been made to develop a new, rapid, and reliable bio-analytical method for the determination of Nitecapone in human plasma with a short time of analysis. The aim of this method is the determination of these COMT inhibitors simultaneously in human plasma with a simple and fast extraction and quantification procedure to allow their therapeutic monitoring when needed in a reasonable time with a low cost.
Besides, fast bio-analytical methods would be beneficial in pharmacokinetic or bioequivalence studies where a high number of samples need fast analysis. Hyphenated techniques refer to the coupling of an independent analytical instrument like MS, FTIR, and NMR to the HPLC system to provide detection. The most common and effective hyphenated technique is LC-MS. MS detection has become the standard detector system for bio-analytical methods and the analysis of pharmaceutical compounds in biological systems (e.g., plasma or urine). The LC-MS/MS technique was selected to develop a satisfactory, sensitive, selective method with a desirable time of the chromatographic run.
MATERIALS AND METHOD:
Method and Experimental Design: A LC-MS/MS method was performed on a liquid chromatographic system consist of Shimadzu LC 10, an auto sampler of Shimadzu (SIL-HTc) coupled with an Applied Biosystems SCIEX a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (API 4000) with electrospray ionization (ESI) used for analysis and Applied Biosystems/ MDS SCIEX Analyst software (version 1.4.2) for processing and data collecting. Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm ID, 5 μm) is used as a stationary phase. An ultrasonic bath sonicator (Frontline FS 4, Mumbai, India), semi-micro analytical balance (India), and Whatman filter paper No. 41 are used in the study. The work was executed in the year 2018.
Reagents used: Nitecapone were procured from Yarrow chemicals, Mumbai, India. Tolcapone (Internal Standard) was procured from Mankind Pharma Limited, India. Acetonitrile of HPLC grade was procured from Rankem Ltd., India. The water of HPLC grade was obtained from Merck Specialities Private Limited, Mumbai, India. Ammonium phosphate and orthophosphoric acid of HPLC grade were procured from Merck Specialities Private Limited, Mumbai, India.
Drug Profile of Nitecapone: It has been used by the physician in the treatment of patients with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinson’s disease is an enduring degenerative disorder of the central nervous system that mostly involves the motor system. The general indications of Parkinson’s disease are trembling, severity, slowness of movement, and difficulty with walking. To overcome these problems, an oral treatment of Nitecapone was initiated for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease 7. The structure 7 of Nitecapone is shown in Fig. 1.
Chemical Structure:
FIG. 1: CHEMICAL STRUCTURE OF NITECAPONE
Chemical Name: 3 - (3, 4 – dihydroxy – 5 - nitro-benzylidene) pentane-2, 4 – dione 7.
Molecular Formula: C12H11NO6 7.
Molecular Weight: 265.221 g/mol 7.
Appearance: Beige powder.
Solubility: Soluble in dimethyl sulfoxide, methanol, dimethylformamide, acetonitrile, and ethanol.
CAS Number: 116313-94-1 7.
Mechanism of Action: Nitecapone is a selective inhibitor of the enzyme catechol – O - methyl transferase (COMT). Clinical trials for Nitecapone oral therapy indicate that it is safety, efficacy, rapid and intensive control over Parkinson's disease. So, Nitecapone is clinically approved for the treatment of Parkinson's disease 7.
Drug Profile of Tolcapone: It has been used by physician in the treatment of patients with Parkinson’s disease 8. Structure 8 of Tolcapone is shown in Fig. 2.
Chemical Structure:
FIG. 2: CHEMICAL STRUCTURE OF TOLCAPONE
Chemical Name: (3, 4 - dihydroxy - 5 -nitrophenyl) - (4 - methylphenyl) methanone 8.
Molecular Formula: C14H11NO5 8.
Molecular Weight: 273.24 g/mol 8.
Appearance: Yellowish powder.
Solubility: Freely soluble in acetone and tetrahydrofuran. Soluble in methanol, acetonitrile, and ethylacetate. Sparingly soluble in chloroform and dichloromethane. Insoluble in water and n-hexane
CAS Number: 134308-13-7 8.
Mechanism of Action: Tolcapone is a selective inhibitor of the enzyme catechol - O-methyl transferase (COMT). Tolcapone is clinically approved for the treatment of Parkinson's disease.
Theoretical Analysis and Objective of the Present Work:
Preparation of Mobile Phase: For the preparation of mobile phase 9, an accurately weighed quantity of 1.32 g of Ammonium phosphate was taken into a 1000 mL beaker and diluted to 1000 mL with HPLC grade water and degassed in an ultrasonic water bath for 10 min and filtered through 0.45 µm nylon membrane filter using vacuum filtration gives required buffer concentration of 0.01 M Ammonium phosphate buffer and the pH was adjusted to 5.0 with orthophosphoric acid. This pH 5 buffers mixed with HPLC grade Acetonitrile in the proportion of 70:30, % v/v, and it was filtered through 0.45 µm nylon membrane filter and degassed by ultra-sonication for 10 min.
Bio-analytical Conditions: The chromatographic analysis was performed by using a mobile phase of 0.01 M Ammonium phosphate buffer with pH was adjusted to 5 with orthophosphoric acid were mixed with HPLC grade Acetonitrile in the proportion of 70:30, % v/v with flow rate 0.8 mL/min by positive ion mode (API 4000). The detection was performed by atmospheric pressure electrospray ionization (ESI) tandem mass spectrometry in positive ion mode 10. The details of the conditions shown in Table 1.
MASS SPECTROMETRY CONDITIONS
Acquisition duration | : | 3.0 min |
Polarity | : | Positive |
Scan Time | : | 200 milliseconds (for each MRM |
Resolution | : | Ql: Unit and Q3: Unit Detection |
Q1 Mass Q3 Mass: Nitecapone 266.2, 156.2.
Tolcapone: 274.2283.1
Can Vary by ± 0.5 Mass Units Source/Gas Parameters (Positive Mode): API 4000
Gas 1(GS1): 40.00 (Psi).
Gas 2(GS2): 30.00 (Psi).
Curtain Gas (CUR): 20.00 (Psi).
Collision Gas (CAD): 6.00 (Psi).
Ion Spray Voltage (IS): 4000.00.
Temperature ºC: 500.00.
Interface Heater: Switched on.
TABLE 1: COMPOUND PARAMETERS FOR MASS SPECTROMETRY TUNING OF NITECAPONE
Parameter | Nitecapone |
Declustering potential (DP) | 71.00 V |
Entrance potential (EP) | 10.00 V |
Collision energy (CE) | 32.00 V |
Collision cell exit potential (CXP) | 6.00 V |
Preparation of Standard and Working Solutions for Nitecapone: The Nitecapone stock solution was prepared by dissolving 10 mg of Nitecapone in 0.5 % ammonia solution in acetonitrile and made up the volume with the same in a 10 mL volumetric flask to produce a solution of 1000 µg/mL. This solution was kept in the refrigerator at 2-8 °C. The stock solutions were diluted to suitable concentrations using diluent for spiking into a plasma to obtain calibration curve standards, quality control samples for further use. All other dilutions were made in mobile phase 11.
Preparation of Stock solution for Tolcapone (Internal Standard): A stock solution of Tolcapone (Internal standard) was prepared by dissolving 10 mg of Tolcapone in diluent (a mixture of HPLC grade acetonitrile and water in a ratio (60:40, v/v) and made up the volume with the same in a 10 mL volumetric flask to produce a solution of 1000 µg/mL. This solution was kept in the refrigerator at 2-8 °C. Working is solutions were prepared by suitably diluting the above-mentioned stock solution afresh before use 11.
Preparation of Calibration Curve Standards and Quality Control (QC) Samples: Calibration curve standard consisting of a set of eight non-zero concentrations ranging from 50 ng/mL to 2000 ng/mL of Nitecapone was prepared. Prepared quality control samples consisted of concentrations of 50 ng/mL (lower limit of quantification quality control sample), 150 ng/mL (Lower quality control sample), 1000 ng/mL (middle quality control sample), and 1700 ng/mL (higher quality control sample) for Nitecapone. These samples were stored at -70 °C ± 10 °C until use. Twelve sets of LQC and HQC samples were stored at -20 °C ± 5 °C to check stability.
Preparation of Plasma Samples: For the preparation of plasma samples, human blood samples were collected into polypropylene tubes containing K2-EDTA. Each tube was centrifuged for 15 min at 8500 rpm and the supernatant was collected in another tube. To the supernatant 1 mL of acetonitrile was added and kept for 10 min for the plasma proteins to precipitate, and then the supernatant was collected for further use 11.
Procedure for Spiked Human Plasma: Liquid-liquid extraction was used to isolate Nitecapone, and Tolcapone IS from human plasma. For this, aliquots of 20 μL of internal standard and 100 μL of plasma sample were added into labeled polypropylene tubes and vortexed briefly. Followed by the addition of 20 μL of diluent and vortexed.
Then 20 μL of 2% orthophosphoric acid buffer was added to it and vortexed. Followed by addition of 5 mL of ammonium phosphate and shaken for 20 min on a reciprocating shaker at 300 rpm. Samples were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 min at 5 °C.
Then supernatant organic layer (5.0 mL) was transferred to pre-labeled glass dry test tubes and evaporated to dryness in turboVap at 40 °C. The samples were reconstituted in 1000 μL of the mobile phase, which contains 0.01M ammonium phosphate buffer: acetonitrile (70:30; v/v), and 20 μL of the sample were injected to HPLC with MS-MS detection 11.
Preparation of Sample Solution: After bulk spiking, aliquots of 100 μL for calibration curves and 100 μL for quality controls of spiked plasma samples were pipetted out into a pre-labeled polypropylene microcentrifuge tubes, and then all the bulk spiked samples were stored to deep freezer at -70 °C ± 10 °C, except twelve replicates each of LQC and HQC, which were stored in -20 °C ± 5 °C for generation of stability data. The thawed samples were vortexes to ensure complete mixing of the contents.
Methodology:
Parameters: The details of the chromatographic and mass spectroscopic parameters9 are as follows:
Equipment: Shimadzu LC 10, an auto sampler of Shimadzu (SIL-HTc) coupled with an Applied Biosystems SCIEX a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (API 4000) with electrospray ionization (ESI) and Applied Biosystems/MDS SCIEX Analyst software (version 1.4.2).
Column: ZORBAX Eclipse plus C18 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm id, 5 μm particle size).
Mobile Phase: 0.01 M Ammonium phosphate buffer with pH was adjusted to 5 with ortho-phosphoric acid were mixed with HPLC grade acetonitrile in the proportion of 70:30, v/v.
Flow Rate: 0.8 mL/min.
Run time: 3 min.
Splitness: 25:75.
Column oven temperature: 35 ± 2 ºC.
Auto sampler temperature: 10 ºC.
Injection volume: 20 mL.
Retention time of Nitecapone: 2.12 min.
Retention time of Tolcapone : 2.58 min.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Method Optimisation: For the optimisation10of LC-MS/MS method, several parameters and mobile phase compositions were tried. A satisfactory separation and good peak symmetry for Nitecapone were obtained with ZORBAX Eclipse plus C18 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm id, 5 μm particle size) and mobile phase containing a mixture of 0.01M Ammonium phosphate buffer with pH was adjusted to 5 with orthophosphoric acid, and Acetonitrile in the proportion of (70:30, v/v) was delivered at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min by positive ion mode (API 4000) with an injection volume of 20 µL and a run time of 3 min. Detection is performed by atmospheric pressure electrospray ionization (ESI) tandem mass spectrometry in positive ion mode. The precursor to product ion transitions is m/z 266.20 to 156.20 for Nitecapone and m/z 274.20 to 183.10 for Tolcapone (Internal standard) were used for quantization was shown in Fig. 3, 4, 5 and 6.
The retention time of Nitecapone and Tolcapone (Internal standard) was found to be 2.12 min and 2.58 min, respectively. A typical chromatogram of blank plasma, mobile phase, Nitecapone, and Tolcapone (Internal standard) is shown in Fig. 7, 8, 9, and 10. The structures of precursor (Q1) and product (Q3) ions of Nitecapone and Tolcapone IS are shown in Fig. 5 and 6 below.
Chromatogram of blank plasma, mobile phase, Nitecapone and Tolcapone (Internal standard) as shown in Fig. 7, 8, 9, and 10 below:
FIG. 3: MASS SPECTRA OF NITECAPONE FOR PRECURSOR AND PRODUCT ION MASSES
FIG. 4: MASS SPECTRA OF TOLCAPONE IS FOR PRECURSOR AND PRODUCT ION MASSES
FIG. 5: STRUCTURES OF PRECURSOR (Q1) AND PRODUCT (Q3) IONS OF NITECAPONE
FIG. 6: STRUCTURES OF PRECURSOR (Q1) AND PRODUCT (Q3) IONS OF TOLCAPONE IS
Method Validation: The established LC-MS/MS method is validated for selectivity, specificity, sensitivity, linearity, accuracy, precision, recovery, stability, and carry over test according to the principles of the FDA guidelines 12-15.
Screening of Plasma Lots and Specificity: The selectivity of the present method was evaluated by screening six different lots of blank plasma. All of them were found to have no significant endogenous interferences at the retention times of the analyte and the internal standard.
The same human EDTA plasma lots free of interfering substances were used to prepare the calibration curve standards, and the quality control samples for the validation study is cited in Table 2.
TABLE 2: PERCENT INTERFERENCES AT THE RETENTION TIMES OF NITECAPONE AND THE TOLCAPONE (INTERNAL STANDARD)
Plasma Lot no. | Nitecapone | Tolcapone (IS) | ||||
Area at Analyte RT in blank | Analyte
Area in LLOQ |
Interference Area (%) at Analyte RT | is Area
in Blank |
is Area
in LLOQ |
Interference
Area (%) at is RT |
|
Blank-1 | 0 | 3863 | 0 | 0 | 381648 | 0 |
Blank-2 | 0 | 3759 | 0 | 0 | 385681 | 0 |
Blank-3 | 0 | 3892 | 0 | 0 | 380523 | 0 |
Blank-4 | 0 | 3679 | 0 | 0 | 387227 | 0 |
Blank-5 | 0 | 3543 | 0 | 0 | 379122 | 0 |
Blank-6 | 0 | 3887 | 0 | 0 | 389743 | 0 |
Sensitivity: The lowest limit of reliable quantification (LLOQ) for Nitecapone was set at the concentration of 50 ng/mL. The precision and accuracy of Nitecapone at this concentration were estimated.
Linearity: The linearity of Nitecapone was assessed at six concentration levels in the range of 50, 150, 450, 1000, 1700, and 2000 ng/mL in plasma samples.
Peak area ratios for each solution against its corresponding concentration were measured and the calibration curve was obtained.
Extraction Recovery: Twenty-four blank matrix samples were processed, and six sets of each blanks samples were reconstituted with the aqueous quality control dilutions at low, middle, and high concentration without an internal standard, which represents 100% extraction of analyte(s) (non-extracted samples). Six blanks were reconstituted with the internal standard solution, which represents a 100 % extraction of internal standard (Non-extracted sample). The non-extracted samples were injected. The recovery comparison samples of Nitecapone were compared against extracted samples of LQC, MQC, and HQC of PA Batch-I (Precision and accuracy). The recovery comparison samples of internal standard were compared against the response of internal standard in MQC level.
Extraction recoverry (R%) = Psbe / Psae × 100
Where R is extraction recovery, Psbe is the mean value of the peak area responses obtained from plasma samples spiked with analyte before extraction, and Psae is the mean value of the peak area responses obtained from plasma samples spiked with analyte after extraction.
Accuracy and Precision: Intra assay precision and accuracy were determined by analyzing six replicates at four different quality control levels in two runs on the same day. Inter-assay precision and accuracy were determined by analyzing six replicates at four different quality control levels on five different runs. The acceptance criteria included accuracy within ≤ 15% deviation (SD) from the nominal values, except LLOQ quality control, where it should be ≤ 20% and a precision of ≤ 15% relative standard deviation (RSD), except for LLOQ quality control, where it should be < 20%.
Stability: The stability of Nitecapone in plasma was performed using six replicates of two quality control samples at low and high levels. Samples were prepared by spiking drug-free plasma with appropriate volumes of Nitecapone standard solutions. The stability was evaluated with different studies such as room temperature stock solution stability, refrigerated stock solution stability, room temperature spiking solution stability, refrigerated spiking solution stability, freeze-thaw, short term stability, benchtop stability, etc. Stability tests were conducted to evaluate the analyte stability in stock solutions and in plasma samples under different conditions. The stock solution stability at room temperature and refrigerated conditions (2-8 °C) was performed by comparing the area response of the analytes (stability samples) with the response of the sample prepared from the fresh stock solution. Bench top stability (6 h), processed sample stability (auto sampler stability for 32 h), freeze-thaw stability (four cycles), reinjection stability (24 h), wet extract stability (30 h) and plasma samples stability at -20 °C were performed at LQC and HQC levels using six replicates at each level. Samples were considered to be stable if assay values were within the acceptable limits of accuracy (≤15% SD) and precision (≤15% RSD).
Matrix Effect Test of Nitecapone: Two sets of extracted blank plasma samples each containing six tubes (plasma taken from six different lots) are taken. One set of tubes are reconstituted with an equivalent aqueous concentration of LQC and the other set of tubes are reconstituted with equivalent aqueous concentration of HQC. These samples are known as post spiked samples. These samples are analyzed along with equivalent aqueous LQC and HQC samples. The matrix effect is evaluated by determining the % response ratio using the formula.
Response ratio (%) = Mean area ratio of post spiked samples / Mean area ratio of equivalent aqueous samples × 100
LC-MS/MS Analysis: A binary mixture of 0.01 M Ammonium phosphate buffer with pH was adjusted to 5 with orthophosphoric acid, and Acetonitrile in the proportion of (70:30, v/v) was proved to be the most suitable mobile phase of all the combinations since the chromatographic peaks obtained were well defined and resolved and free from tailing. A mobile phase flow rate of 0.8 mL/min with a splitless of 25/75 was found to be suitable in the study range of 0.3-1.0 mL/min.
Detection of the ions was performed by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) of the transitions m/z 266.20 to 156.20 for Nitecapone and m/z 274.20 to 183.10 for Tolcapone (Internal standard). The retention time of Nitecapone and Tolcapone (Internal standard) was found to be 2.12 min and 2.58 min, respectively.
Linearity: The calibration curve was linear in the range of 50 ng/mL to 2000 ng/mL of the Nitecapone, as shown in Table 3. A straight line fit made through the data points by the least square regression analysis showed a constant proportion-ality with minimal data scattering. The correlation coefficient (R2) is 0.9997 for Nitecapone, as shown in Table 3 and Fig. 11.
FIG. 11: CALIBRATION CURVE OF NITECAPONE
TABLE 3: LINEARITY OF NITECAPONE
Concentration of Nitecapone (ng/mL) | Peak Area Ratio
(Analyte Area/IS Area) |
50 | 3771 |
150 | 11312 |
450 | 33935 |
1000 | 67869 |
1700 | 119218 |
2000 | 135738 |
Selectivity: There was no significant interference from endogenous components observed at the mass transitions of Nitecapone and Tolcapone (internal standard).
Recovery of the Nitecapone and Tolcapone Internal Standard: Recovery for Nitecapone was found to be in the range of 80.22% to 95.95%, and the mean recovery for Nitecapone was 90.39%. While for Tolcapone (Internal standard) the mean recovery was 92.34%. The recovery results of Nitecapone and Tolcapone (Internal standard) are shown in Tables 4 and 5, respectively.
TABLE 4: RECOVERY OF NITECAPONE FROM HUMAN PLASMA
LQC Response | MQC Response | HQC Response | ||||
Extracted Quality Control | Non Extracted
Quality Control |
Extracted
Quality Control |
Non Extracted
Quality Control |
Extracted Quality Control | Non Extracted Quality Control | |
Sample ID | LQC
(07-12) |
LQC
(1-6) |
MQC
(07-12) |
MQC
(1-6) |
HQC
(07-12) |
HQC
(1-6) |
1 | 11312 | 14291 | 68754 | 71734 | 118744 | 124025 |
2 | 11454 | 14277 | 68212 | 70926 | 119848 | 123329 |
3 | 11598 | 14268 | 68209 | 72182 | 119817 | 124498 |
4 | 11392 | 14171 | 67918 | 71892 | 119221 | 124802 |
5 | 11323 | 14108 | 67972 | 72018 | 119710 | 125191 |
6 | 11314 | 14144 | 67858 | 71665 | 119616 | 125397 |
Mean | 11398.8 | 14209.8 | 68153.8 | 71736.2 | 119493 | 124540 |
SD | 112.47 | 78.35 | 329.49 | 439.07 | 430.86 | 769.47 |
CV% | 0.99 | 0.55 | 0.48 | 0.61 | 0.36 | 0.62 |
N | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
Recovery% | 80.22 | 95.01 | 95.95 | |||
Overall recovery% | 90.39 |
TABLE 5: RECOVERY OF TOLCAPONE (INTERNAL STANDARD) FROM HUMAN PLASMA
Extracted Quality Control ID | IS Response in Extracted Samples (Area) | Non-Extracted
Quality Control ID |
IS Response in Non-Extracted Samples (Area) |
MQC-7 | 421129 | non extracted-MQC-1 | 457293 |
MQC-8 | 430101 | non extracted-MQC-2 | 458100 |
MQC-9 | 418822 | non extracted-MQC-3 | 455183 |
MQC-10 | 417182 | non extracted-MQC-4 | 457189 |
MQC-11 | 421973 | non extracted-MQC-5 | 451334 |
MQC-12 | 415627 | non extracted-MQC-6 | 455144 |
Mean | 420806 | Mean | 455707 |
SD | 5133.321 | SD | 2455.72 |
CV% | 1.22 | CV% | 0.54 |
N | 6 | N | 6 |
Recovery % | 92.34 |
Within-Batch Precision and Accuracy: Within-batch precision for LLOQ quality control ranged from 0.22% to 0.28%, and for LQC, MQC, and HQC ranged from 0.005% to 0.196%. Within-batch accuracy ranged for LLOQ quality control ranged from 100.24% to 100.28%, and for LQC, MQC and HQC ranged from 99.99% to 100.17%. The results of within-batch precision and accuracy for Nitecaponeare represented in Table 6.
TABLE 6: WITHIN-BATCH PRECISION AND ACCURACY FOR NITECAPONE
Quality Control | Concentration (ng/mL) | |||
LLOQ QC | LQC | MQC | HQC | |
50 | 150 | 1000 | 1700 | |
1 | 50.04 | 150.02 | 1000.07 | 1700.02 |
2 | 50.11 | 150.1 | 1000.03 | 1700.05 |
3 | 50.07 | 150.01 | 1000.1 | 1700.13 |
4 | 50.4 | 150.24 | 1000.21 | 1700.25 |
5 | 50.03 | 150.03 | 1000.18 | 1700.11 |
6 | 50.08 | 150.01 | 1000.08 | 1700.22 |
Mean | 50.12 | 150.07 | 1000.11 | 1700.13 |
SD | 0.139 | 0.091 | 0.069 | 0.091 |
CV% | 0.28 | 0.060 | 0.007 | 0.005 |
Nominal % | 100.24 | 100.05 | 100.01 | 100.01 |
N | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
7 | 50.01 | 150.03 | 1001.05 | 1700.04 |
8 | 50.12 | 150.19 | 1003.07 | 1700.02 |
9 | 50.06 | 150.2 | 1000.18 | 1700.19 |
10 | 50.32 | 150.14 | 1000.19 | 1700.27 |
11 | 50.13 | 150.02 | 1000.6 | 1700.08 |
12 | 50.19 | 150.07 | 1005.04 | 1700.28 |
Mean | 50.14 | 150.11 | 1001.69 | 1700.15 |
SD | 0.108 | 0.079 | 1.962 | 0.116 |
CV% | 0.22 | 0.053 | 0.196 | 0.007 |
Nominal % | 100.28 | 100.07 | 100.17 | 100.01 |
N | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
13 | 50.3 | 150.13 | 1000.01 | 1698.4 |
14 | 50.17 | 150.04 | 1000.04 | 1700.18 |
15 | 50.03 | 150.28 | 1000.3 | 1700.45 |
16 | 50.2 | 150.22 | 1000.15 | 1700.18 |
17 | 50.08 | 150.18 | 1000.1 | 1700.01 |
18 | 50.01 | 150.11 | 1000.8 | 1700.18 |
Mean | 50.13 | 150.16 | 1000.23 | 1699.90 |
SD | 0.112 | 0.085 | 0.296 | 0.748 |
CV% | 0.22 | 0.057 | 0.030 | 0.044 |
Nominal % | 100.26 | 100.11 | 100.02 | 99.99 |
N | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
Intra-Day Precision and Accuracy: Intra-day precision for LLOQ quality control was 0.417%, and for LQC, MQC and HQC ranged from 0.036% to 0.092%. Intra-day accuracy for LLOQ quality control was 100.33%, and for LQC, MQC, and HQC ranged from 100.02% to 100.07%. The results of intra-day precision and accuracy for Nitecaponeare represented in Table 7.
Between Batch / Inter-Day Precision and Accuracy: Between batch precision for LLOQ quality control was 0.142%, and for LQC, MQC and HQC ranged from 0.023% to 0.092%.
Between batch accuracy for LLOQ quality control was 100.04% and for LQC, MQC, and HQC ranged from 100.02% to 100.06%. The results of between batch/inter-day precision and accuracy for Nitecapone are represented in Table 8.
Stability: The processing and storage conditions of clinical samples need to maintain the integrity of a drug or at least keep the variation of pre-analysis as minimal as possible. For this reason, stability studies play an important role in bioanalytical method development. In this study, the stability was assessed by considering different studies such as room temperature stock solution stability, refrigerated stock solution stability, room temperature spiking solution stability, refrigerated spiking solution stability, benchtop stability, autosampler stability, freeze-thaw stability, re-injection stability andwet-extract stability. The results show that Nitecapone is stable under the studied conditions since in all cases, the international acceptance criteria (variation values for area smaller than 15 %) were met.
TABLE 7: INTRA-DAY PRECISION AND ACCURACY FOR NITECAPONE
Quality control | Concentration (ng/mL) | |||
LLOQ QC | LQC | MQC | HQC | |
50 | 150 | 1000 | 1700 | |
1 | 50.8 | 150.4 | 1000.18 | 1700.01 |
2 | 50.07 | 150.07 | 1001.1 | 1700.28 |
3 | 50.12 | 150.01 | 1003.18 | 1699.97 |
4 | 50.14 | 150.22 | 1000.1 | 1700..45 |
5 | 50.02 | 150.14 | 1000.2 | 1702.18 |
6 | 50.04 | 150.13 | 1000.5 | 1700.14 |
7 | 50.03 | 150.18 | 999.98 | 1700.21 |
8 | 50.09 | 150.1 | 999.87 | 1700.24 |
9 | 50.17 | 149.98 | 1000.12 | 1700.03 |
10 | 50.22 | 149.87 | 1000.09 | 1700.5 |
11 | 50.12 | 150.16 | 1000.02 | 1699.80 |
12 | 50.18 | 150.07 | 1000.09 | 1700.07 |
Mean | 50.2 | 150.1 | 1000.5 | 1700.3 |
SD | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.6 |
CV% | 0.417 | 0.088 | 0.092 | 0.036 |
Nominal % | 100.33 | 100.07 | 100.05 | 100.02 |
N | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 |
TABLE 8: BETWEEN BATCH/INTER-DAY PRECISION AND ACCURACY FOR NITECAPONE
Quality control | Concentration (ng/mL) | |||
LLOQ QC | LQC | MQC | HQC | |
50 | 150 | 1000 | 1700 | |
1 | 50.05 | 149.95 | 1000.04 | 1700.11 |
2 | 49.97 | 150.02 | 1000.18 | 1700.8 |
3 | 50.03 | 150.04 | 1000.12 | 1700.54 |
4 | 50.17 | 150.17 | 1000.3 | 1700.41 |
5 | 49.94 | 150.12 | 1000.14 | 1702.12 |
6 | 50.06 | 150.03 | 1000.17 | 1700.63 |
7 | 49.98 | 150.12 | 1000.02 | 1700.18 |
8 | 49.96 | 150.03 | 1000.05 | 1700.44 |
9 | 49.94 | 150.45 | 1000.1 | 1700.08 |
10 | 50.01 | 149.97 | 1000.8 | 1700.58 |
11 | 49.92 | 150.04 | 1000.30 | 1699.99 |
12 | 50.12 | 150.02 | 1000.20 | 1700.88 |
13 | 49.99 | 150.02 | 1000.01 | 1700.12 |
14 | 50.11 | 150.06 | 1000.03 | 1700.11 |
15 | 49.99 | 150.4 | 1000.14 | 1700.13 |
16 | 50.12 | 150.01 | 1000.76 | 1700.16 |
17 | 50.01 | 150.23 | 1000.34 | 1699.94 |
18 | 50.03 | 150.04 | 1000.18 | 1700.04 |
Mean | 50.02 | 150.10 | 1000.22 | 1700.40 |
SD | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.23 | 0.51 |
CV% | 0.142 | 0.092 | 0.023 | 0.030 |
Nominal % | 100.04 | 100.06 | 100.02 | 100.02 |
N | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 |
Room Temperature Stock Solution Stability: The stability was found to be 99.3% for Nitecapone with the precision ranged from 0.4 % to 0.9%.
The stability was found to be 100.6% for Tolcapone (Internal standard) with the precision ranged from 0.8% to 1.3%.
The results of room temperature stock solution stability are shown in Table 9.
Refrigerated Stock Solution Stability (at 2-8 °C): The stock solution was found to be stable for four days. The four days stock solution stability of Nitecapone and Tolcapone (Internal standard) was found to be 99.5% and 100.2%, respectively and are shown in Table 10.
Room Temperature Spiking Solution Stability: The stability was found to be 99.2% for Nitecapone with the precision ranged from 0.79% to 0.8%. The stability was found to be 99.8% for Tolcapone (Internal standard), with the precision ranged from 0.6% to 1.4%. The results of room temperature spiking solution stability are shown in table 11.
Refrigerated Spiking Solution Stability of Nitecapone (at 2-8 °C): The spiking solutions were found to be stable for three days. The three days spiking solution stability of Nitecapone at LQC level was found to be 99.01% and is shown in Table 12.
Bench Top Stability: Nitecapone was found to be stable up to 6 h as per the acceptance criteria. The percent mean nominal ranged from 100.02% to 100.06%, and the precision ranged from 0.013% to 0.063%. Results of benchtop stability are shown in table 13.
Auto-sampler Stability: The results demonstrate that the processed samples were stable for 32 h. The percent nominal at 32 h ranged from 100.05% to 100.1%, and precision ranged from 0.046 % to 0.063%. The result of autosampler stability is shown in Table 14.
Freeze-thaw Stability: Freeze-thaw stability of Nitecapone is shown in Table 15. The percent nominal ranged from 99.98% to 100.01%, and the precision ranged from 0.058 % to 0.060% for four freeze-thaw cycles.
Re-injection Stability: The results demonstrate that the reinjected samples were stable for 24 h. The percent stability at 24 h ranged from 99.84% to 100.01%, and the precision ranged from 0.01% to 0.27% for 24 h. Results of rejection stability of Nitecapone are shown in Table 16.
Wet-extract Stability: Wet extract stability results are shown in Table 17. The results demonstrate that the processed samples were stable for 30 hours. The percent nominal at 30 h ranged from 100.02% to 100.03%, and the precision ranged from 0.053% to 0.068%.
TABLE 9: ROOM TEMPERATURE STOCK SOLUTION STABILITY OF NITECAPONE AND TOLCAPONE (INTERNAL STANDARD) FOR 0 AND 6 H
S. no. | Nitecapone Peak Area | Tolcapone (Internal standard) Peak Area | ||
0 h | 6 h | 0 h | 6 h | |
1 | 68883 | 68328 | 412447 | 420348 |
2 | 68627 | 68437 | 411346 | 413476 |
3 | 68827 | 68867 | 423891 | 417466 |
4 | 68380 | 67506 | 410137 | 417187 |
5 | 68286 | 67808 | 412120 | 411288 |
6 | 68272 | 67348 | 410127 | 414874 |
Mean | 68546 | 68049 | 413345 | 415773 |
SD | 271.78 | 590.23 | 5256.77 | 3224.78 |
CV % | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 0.8 |
Stability % | 99.3 | 100.6 |
TABLE 10: REFRIGERATED STOCK SOLUTION STABILITY OF NITECAPONE AND TOLCAPONE (INTERNAL STANDARD) AT 2-8 °C FOR 4 DAYS
S. no. | Nitecapone | Tolcapone
(Internal Standard) |
||
Stability Standard
Stock |
Comparison Standard
Stock |
Stability Standard
Stock |
Comparison Standard
Stock |
|
Peak Area | Peak Area | Peak Area | Peak Area | |
1 | 67992 | 68717 | 415487 | 420438 |
2 | 68413 | 68281 | 415650 | 419342 |
3 | 67932 | 68863 | 420485 | 417822 |
4 | 68334 | 68235 | 413453 | 417562 |
5 | 68835 | 67866 | 413392 | 419928 |
6 | 69865 | 67329 | 413882 | 403466 |
Mean | 68562 | 68215 | 415392 | 416426 |
SD | 716.70 | 562.75 | 2685.30 | 6450.80 |
CV % | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.5 |
N | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
Mean response of standard stock | 68562 | 415392 | ||
Mean standard response | 68215 | 416426 | ||
Response % | 99.5 | 100.2 |
TABLE 11: ROOM TEMPERATURE SPIKING SOLUTION STABILITY OF NITECAPONE AND TOLCAPONE (INTERNAL STANDARD) FOR 0 AND 6 H
S. no. | Nitecapone Peak Area | Tolcapone (Internal standard) Peak Area | ||
0 h | 6 h | 0 h | 6 h | |
1 | 68647 | 68568 | 415856 | 421983 |
2 | 68856 | 68338 | 415887 | 418466 |
3 | 67945 | 68221 | 411927 | 416563 |
4 | 68348 | 68568 | 418365 | 414367 |
5 | 68511 | 67234 | 418345 | 417265 |
6 | 69543 | 67666 | 429388 | 415692 |
Mean | 68642 | 68099 | 418295 | 417389 |
SD | 537.96 | 538.08 | 5922.17 | 2644.80 |
CV % | 0.8 | 0.79 | 1.4 | 0.6 |
Stability % | 99.2 | 99.8 |
TABLE 12: REFRIGERATED SPIKING SOLUTION STABILITY OF NITECAPONE AT LQC LEVEL AT 2-8 °C FOR 3 DAYS
S. no. | Stability Standard Spiking Solution (LQC) | Comparison Standard Spiking Solution (LQC) |
150 ng/mL | 152 ng/mL | |
1 | 150.1 | 151.12 |
2 | 149.98 | 151.93 |
3 | 150.11 | 152.21 |
4 | 150.01 | 151.43 |
5 | 150.09 | 151.91 |
6 | 150.12 | 150.81 |
Mean | 150.07 | 151.57 |
SD | 0.06 | 0.54 |
CV % | 0.039 | 0.356 |
N | 6 | 6 |
Response % | 99.01 |
TABLE 13: BENCH TOP STABILITY OF NITECAPONE FOR 6 h
S. no. | Concentration (ng/mL) | |
LQC | HQC | |
150.0 | 1700.0 | |
1 | 150.01 | 1700.21 |
2 | 150.2 | 1700.23 |
3 | 149.99 | 1700.26 |
4 | 150.03 | 1700.08 |
5 | 150.1 | 1700.31 |
6 | 150.2 | 1700.73 |
Mean | 150.09 | 1700.30 |
SD | 0.09 | 0.22 |
CV % | 0.063 | 0.013 |
Nominal % | 100.06 | 100.02 |
N | 6 | 6 |
TABLE 14: AUTOSAMPLER STABILITY OF NITECAPONE IN PROCESSED HUMAN PLASMA SAMPLES FOR 32 h
S. No. | Concentration (ng/mL) | |
LQC | HQC | |
150 | 1700 | |
1 | 150.11 | 1701.21 |
2 | 150.14 | 1700.03 |
3 | 149.97 | 1701.26 |
4 | 150.13 | 1703.18 |
5 | 150.01 | 1702.11 |
6 | 150.05 | 1702.03 |
Mean | 150.07 | 1701.64 |
SD | 0.07 | 1.06 |
CV % | 0.046 | 0.063 |
Nominal % | 100.05 | 100.10 |
N | 6 | 6 |
TABLE 15: FREEZE-THAW STABILITY (FT– IV CYCLE) OF NITECAPONE
S. no. | Concentration (ng/mL) | |
LQC | HQC | |
150 | 1700 | |
1 | 149.87 | 1699.21 |
2 | 150.1 | 1701.03 |
3 | 149.94 | 1699.26 |
4 | 150.01 | 1701.01 |
5 | 150.02 | 1699.01 |
6 | 149.89 | 1701.02 |
Mean | 149.97 | 1700.09 |
SD | 0.09 | 1.02 |
CV % | 0.058 | 0.060 |
Nominal % | 99.98 | 100.01 |
N | 6 | 6 |
TABLE 16: RE-INJECTION STABILITY OF NITECAPONE FOR 0 H AND 24 h
S. no. | Re-injection stability of Nitecapone for 0 hours | Re-injection stability of Nitecapone for 24 hours | ||
Concentration (ng/mL) | ||||
LQC | HQC | LQC | HQC | |
150 | 1700 | 150 | 1700 | |
1 | 150.02 | 1700.3 | 150.02 | 1700.01 |
2 | 149.22 | 1699.94 | 149.94 | 1699.12 |
3 | 149.98 | 1700.12 | 150.02 | 1700.02 |
4 | 150.1 | 1700.34 | 149.03 | 1699.09 |
5 | 150.22 | 1699.98 | 150.01 | 1700.52 |
6 | 149.78 | 1700.04 | 149.57 | 1701.01 |
Mean | 149.89 | 1700.12 | 149.77 | 1699.96 |
SD | 0.36 | 0.17 | 0.40 | 0.76 |
CV % | 0.24 | 0.01 | 0.27 | 0.04 |
Nominal % | 99.92 | 100.01 | 99.84 | 100.00 |
N | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
Stability % | 99.92 | 99.99 |
TABLE 17: WET-EXTRACT STABILITY OF NITE-CAPONE FOR 30 h
S. no. | Concentration (ng/mL) | |
LQC | HQC | |
150 | 1700 | |
1 | 149.97 | 1699.71 |
2 | 150.12 | 1699.33 |
3 | 149.96 | 1700.16 |
4 | 150.11 | 1701.31 |
5 | 150.12 | 1699.71 |
6 | 149.99 | 1702.32 |
Mean | 150.05 | 1700.42 |
SD | 0.08 | 1.15 |
CV % | 0.053 | 0.068 |
Nominal % | 100.03 | 100.02 |
N | 6 | 6 |
TABLE 18: MATRIX EFFECT OF NITECAPONE
Plasma (Batch no.) | LQC (150.0 ng/mL) Mean HQC (1700.0 ng/mL) | Mean | HQC (1700.0 ng/mL) | Mean | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
1 | 150.1 | 150.3 | 149.92 | 150.11 | 1700.01 | 1700.21 | 1700.01 | 1700.08 |
2 | 149.98 | 150.12 | 150.1 | 150.07 | 1701.01 | 1700.13 | 1700.03 | 1700.39 |
3 | 150.12 | 149.97 | 150.3 | 150.13 | 1700.02 | 1700.3 | 1699.82 | 1700.05 |
4 | 150.03 | 150.8 | 149.01 | 149.95 | 1700.01 | 1700.2 | 1700.23 | 1700.15 |
5 | 150.2 | 150.03 | 150.02 | 150.08 | 1700.04 | 1699.93 | 1700.2 | 1700.06 |
6 | 150.04 | 149.99 | 149.99 | 150.01 | 1699.98 | 1699.67 | 1700.31 | 1699.99 |
(Lipemic) | 150.23 | 150.16 | 150.3 | 150.23 | 1700.03 | 1699.83 | 1700.12 | 1699.99 |
(Hemolytic) | 150.13 | 150.14 | 150.12 | 150.13 | 1700.22 | 1700.64 | 1699.43 | 1700.1 |
Mean | 150.09 | Mean | 1700.10 | |||||
SD | 0.09 | SD | 0.13 | |||||
CV % | 0.1 | CV % | 0.01 | |||||
Nominal | 100.1 | Nominal | 100.01 | |||||
N | 8 | N | 8 |
Matrix Effect: No significant matrix effect was observed in all the eight batches, including hemolysis and lipemic plasma for Nitecapone at low (LQC) and high (HQC) concentrations. The precision and accuracy for Nitecapone at LQC concentration were found to be 0.1% and 100.1%, respectively, and at HQC concentration was found to be 0.01% and 100.01 %, respectively and shown in Table 18.
Summary and Conclusion: The present LC-MS/MS method for the estimation of Nitecapone in human plasma by using Tolcapone as an internal standard is a simple and inexpensive liquid-liquid extraction procedure and an isocratic chromate-graphy condition using a reversed-phase column suitable for real-time analysis. This is a rapid and accurate method for the estimation of Nitecapone in human plasma. Peaks were well separated and without any interference. The best response was obtained with Zorbax Eclipse plus C18 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm ID, 5 μm) and mobile phase containing a mixture of 0.01 M Ammonium phosphate buffer with pH was adjusted to 5.0 with ortho-phosphoric acid and acetonitrile in the proportion of (70:30, v/v %) was delivered at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min by positive ion mode (API 4000) with injection volume of 20 µL and a run time of 3 min.
Detection is performed by atmospheric pressure electrospray ionization (ESI) tandem mass spectrometry in positive ion mode. The precursor to product ion transitions is m/z 266.20 to 156.20 for Nitecapone and m/z 274.20 to 183.10 for Tolcapone (Internal standard) were used for quantization. The retention time of Nitecapone and Tolcapone (Internal standard) was found to be 2.12 min and 2.58 min, respectively. Linearity was established for Nitecapone in the range of 50 ng/mL to 2000 ng/mL with correlation coefficient (r = 0.9997), and the overall percentage recovery was 90.39% for Nitecapone and 92.34% for Tolcapone (Internal standard) respectively. The CV % values of accuracy and precision for Nitecapone were found to be ≤ 15%, which indicates the accuracy and precision of the proposed method.
The CV % values of accuracy and precision of Nitecapone for stability studies were found to be ≤ 15%, which indicates the stability of the proposed method. The LC-MS/MS method for the estimation of Nitecapone in human plasma by using Tolcapone as an internal standard exhibited excellent performance in terms of selectivity, linearity, accuracy, precision, recovery, stability, and matrix effect test. In addition, the reported method has a short analysis run time, an advantage over previously reported methods. Therefore, this method is suitable for the therapeutic drug monitoring of Nitecapone.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The authors are thankful to Yarrow chemicals, India and Mankind Pharma Limited, India for providing the samples for research.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: No conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES:
- Goncalves D, Alves G, Soares-da-Silva P and Falcao A: Bioanalytical chromatographic methods for the determination of catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors in rodents and human samples: a review. Analytica Chimica Acta 2012; 710: 17-32.
- Wikberg T and Taskinen J: Determination of a catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor, nitecapone in human plasma and urine by liquid chromatography. J Pharm Biomed Anal 1991; 9(1): 59-64.
- Sundberg S, Scheinin M, Ojala-Karlsson P, Kaakkola S, Akkila J and Gordin A: Exercise hemodynamics and catecholamine metabolism after catechol ‐ O ‐ methyl-transferase inhibition with nitecapone. American society for Clinical Pharmacol and therapeutics 1990; 48: 356-64.
- Wikberg T and Taskinen J: Identification of major metabolites of the catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor nitecapone in the rat and dog. Drug metabolism and disposition 1993; 21: 325-33.
- Timm U and Erdin R: Determination of catechol-O-methyltranferase inhibitor Ro 40-7592 in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with coulometric detection. Journal of Chromatography 1992; 593: 63-68.
- Ribiero RP, Gasparetto JC and Vilhena RO: Simultaneous determination of levodopa, carbidopa, entacapone, tolcapone, 3-O-methyldopa and dopamine in human plasma by HPLC-MS/MS method. Bioanalysis 2015; 7(2): 207-20
- PubChem:https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/5464105.
- PubChem:https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/4659569.
- Wenkui Li, Zhang Jie and Francis LS: Handbook of LC-MS bio-analysis: best practices, experimental protocols and regulations. New Jersy John Wiley & Sons First Edition 2013; 205-16.
- Wenkui Li, Zhang Jie and Francis LS: Handbook of LC-MS bio-analysis: best practices, experimental protocols and regulations. New Jersy John Wiley & Sons First Edition 2013; 185-04
- Wenkui Li, Zhang Jie and Francis LS: Handbook of LC-MS bio-analysis: best practices, experimental protocols and regulations. New Jersy John Wiley & Sons First Edition 2013; 165-84.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration: Bio-analyticalmethod validation: Guidance for Industry 2018: https://www. fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidances/ucm070107.Pdf.
- Wenkui Li, Zhang Jie and Francis LS: Handbook of LC-MS bio-analysis: best practices, experimental protocols and regulations. New Jersy John Wiley & Sons 2013; 89-95.
- Wenkui Li, Zhang Jie and Francis LS: Handbook of LC-MS bio-analysis; best practices, experimental protocols and regulations. New Jer John Wiley & Son 2013; 229-38.
- Wenkui Li, Zhang Jie and Francis LS: Handbook of LC-MS bio-analysis: best practices, experimental protocols and regulations. New Jersy John Wiley & Sons 2013; 37: 46.
How to cite this article:
Parida AK, Rao KS and Patnaik AK: Development and validation of nitecapone in human plasma using tolcapone as internal standard by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2021; 12(1): 226-40. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232. 12(1).226-40.
All © 2013 are reserved by the International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.