DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF SPECTROSCOPIC METHODS FOR THE SIMULTANEOUS ESTIMATION OF RASAGILINE AND RILUZOLE
HTML Full TextDEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF SPECTROSCOPIC METHODS FOR THE SIMULTANEOUS ESTIMATION OF RASAGILINE AND RILUZOLE
Ramgopal Dhanwad, Deepali, L. Harini and K. C. Chaluvaraju *
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Govt. College of Pharmacy, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
ABSTRACT: In the present study, an effort has been made to estimate Rasagiline and Riluzole simultaneously in their bulk and physical mixture by UV-Visible spectrophotometric methods. The methods developed are precise, reliable simultaneous equations and area under the curve (AUC) method. The absorption maxima in the simultaneous equation method are 265.20 nm and 263.40 nm, respectively, for rasagiline and riluzole. Similarly, in the area under the curve method, the wavelength selected for estimation is in the range of 260.20 - 270.20 nm and 258.40-268.40 nm, respectively for rasagiline and riluzole. In the two methods developed, the Beer- Lambartz’s range was in the concentration range of 50 to 250 µg/mL for rasagiline and 4 to 20µg/mL for riluzole. The percentage recovery was found to be in the range of 100.43% and 100.01% for rasagiline and riluzole. ICH guidelines were followed in the proposed methods for their reproducibility and accuracy. The proposed methods can be adopted industrially and in research laboratories for the routine simultaneous analysis of Rasagaline and Riluzole in their bulk and dosage forms.
Keywords: Rasagiline, Riluzole, Spectroscopic method, Absorption, Simultaneous estimation, Methanol
INTRODUCTION: Rasagiline is chemically (1R)-N-(prop-2-yn-1-yl)-2, 3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-amine (Fig:1) Its molecular formula is C12H13N and molecular weight is 171.23 g/mol. It is soluble in Methanol. It is used in the treatment of Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and belongs to the category of an antiparkinsonian agent 1, 2. Rasagiline is a propargyl amine and an irreversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase (MAO). MAO, a flavin-containing enzyme, regulates the metabolic degradation of catecholamines and serotonin in the CNS and peripheral tissues. MAO-B is the major form in the human brain and is responsible for the regulation of the metabolic degradation of dopamine and phenylethylamine.
Rasagiline was also shown to be a potent and irreversible inhibitor of MAO-B in platelets 3, 4, 5.
FIG. 1: STRUCTURE OF RASAGILINE
Riluzole is chemically 6-(trifluoromethoxy)-1,3-benzothiazol-2-amine. Its molecular formula is C8H5F3N2OS, and its molecular weight is 234.198 g/mol6. It is slightly soluble in water but completely soluble in methanol 7, 8, 9, 10, 11. It is used in the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and belongs to the category of anti-convulsant.
FIG. 2: STRUCTURE OF RILUZOLE
It is found that the combination of rasagiline with riluzole is safe and increases survival by about 20% in a dose-dependent manner for the improvement of current neuroprotective treatment strategies of ALS 2, 12. Validated analytical methods are required to characterize these drugs and product composition in all the phases of their formulation developments. On the literature survey, it is revealed that several methods of analyzing rasagiline 13, 14, 15, and riluzole 16, 17 by UV-Visible spectrophotometric methods were found. But no analytical method was found for simultaneous estimation of rasagiline and riluzole. Keeping these observations in mind, we have decided to develop newer, simpler, rapid, accurate, and reproducible spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous estimation of rasagiline and riluzole in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage form. A physical mixture was prepared by blending each 50 mg of rasagiline and riluzole. Tablets were prepared from the mixture with other excipients required for tablet formulation as no combined marketed dosage forms are found.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Materials: All the chemicals and reagents used for the development of proposed methods to estimate rasagiline and riluzole are of spectroscopic grade. The instrument UV-Visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu-1800) was used for the analytical method development and validation of rasagiline and riluzole. The present work was carried out at the Department of pharmaceutical chemistry, Govt. College of Pharmacy, Bengaluru. A pure sample of rasagiline and riluzole for the current study was procured from reliable sources. Rasagiline was purchased from Subtle Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd., and riluzole was purchased from Trichemie pharma., methanol (HPLC grade) from Merck. Double distilled Millipore water was used for the analysis, and the same was collected from Milli pore Direct Q3.
Methods: The following spectrophotometric methods were selected to analyze the combination of rasagiline and riluzole, namely,
Method A: Simultaneous equation method
Method B: Area under the curve (AUC) method
The instrumental specifications of the UV-Visible spectrophotometer used to perform the above methods are in Table 1.
TABLE 1: INSTRUMENTAL SPECIFICATION
UV-Visible spectrophotometer |
SHIMADZU 1800 |
Software |
UV Probe Version 2.43 |
Balance |
Sartorius |
Selection of Solvent for Analysis: The selection of solvents for analysis was carried out by the effect of different solvents on the pure drug and tablet powder. Riluzole was slightly soluble in water. But both the drugs are soluble in methanol and were stable. Hence, methanol was chosen for the preparation of solutions for analysis.Method A: Simultaneous Equation Method:
Selection of Analytical Wavelengths: Standard stock solutions having a concentration of 10 µg/mL was prepared separately, and they were scanned in the wavelength range of 200-400 nm. The maximum (λmax) absorbance of both the drugs was found to be 265.20 nm for rasagiline and 263.40 nm for riluzole.
Preparation of Standard Stock Solutions and Calibration Curve: The stock solution was prepared by dissolving each 50 mg of accurately weighed rasagiline and riluzole in two different 50 mL standard volumetric flask and the final volume was adjusted to 50 mL with methanol to give the stock solution of 1000 µg/mL (stock A) concentration. From stock A, solution of riluzole 2.5 mL was placed in 25 mL volumetric flask, and volume was adjusted with methanol to give a solution of 100 µg/mL of riluzole (stock B). From rasagiline stock solution A 0.5-2.5 mL and 0.4-2 mL of riluzole stock B were pipetted in to 10 mL of volumetric flasks, volume was made up with methanol to get concentrations of 50-250 µg/mL of rasagiline and 4-20 µg/mL of riluzole respectively. The absorbance of the resulting solution was measured against the wavelength of 265.20 nm and 263.40 nm, respectively, against the blank methanol Fig. 3, 4.
FIG. 3: UV-VISIBLE SPECTRA OF RASAGILINE AT 50-250 µg/mL
FIG. 4: UV- VISIBLE SPECTRA OF RILUZOLE AT 4-20 µg/mL
Determination: Simultaneous equation method can be used to determine the concentration of two drugs in combination if each of the drugs absorbs at the λmax of the other. The two wavelengths selected for the development of simultaneous equations are 265.20 nm and 263.40 nm. The formula for simultaneous estimation of drugs used is
CX = A2ay1-A1ay2/ ax2ay1-ax1ay2 Or
CX = A1ay2-A2ay1/ax1ay2 –ax2ay1
Cy=A1ax2-A2ax1/ax2ay1-ax1ay2 Or
Cy= A2ax1-A1ax2/ay2ax1-ay1ax2
Where,
CX = concentration of rasagiline in mixture
CY = concentration of riluzole in the mixture
ax1 and ax2 are absorptivity of rasagiline at its λmax and riluzole λmax
ay1 and ay2 are absorptivity of riluzole at its λmax and rasagiline λmax
The absorptivity values are determined by E1%1cm. The absorbance values of rasagiline at 265.20 nm and 263.40 nm, riluzole at 265.20 nm, and 263.40 nm are in Table 2 & 3, and absorbance of their mixture is in Table 4.
TABLE 2: ABSORBANCE OF RASAGILINE AT 265.20 nm AND 263.40 nm
S. no. |
Concentration of rasagiline (µg/mL) |
Absorbance |
E1 %1cm |
||
265.20 nm |
263.40 nm |
265.20 nm |
263.40 nm |
||
1 |
50 |
0.15 |
0.14 |
30 |
28 |
2 |
100 |
0.32 |
0.29 |
32 |
29 |
3 |
150 |
0.47 |
0.43 |
31.33 |
28.66 |
4 |
200 |
0.62 |
0.58 |
31 |
29 |
5 |
250 |
0.77 |
0.66 |
30.8 |
26.4 |
Average |
31.026 |
28.212 |
Here, ax1 =31.026, ax2 =28.212
TABLE 3: ABSORBANCE OF RILUZOLE AT 265.20 nm AND 263.40 nm
S. no. |
Concentration of rasagiline (µg/mL) |
Absorbance |
E1 %1cm |
||
265.20 nm |
263.40 nm |
265.20 nm |
263.40 nm |
||
1 |
4 |
0.191 |
0.19 |
477.5 |
475 |
2 |
8 |
0.371 |
0.37 |
463.75 |
462.5 |
3 |
12 |
0.552 |
0.56 |
460 |
466.66 |
4 |
15 |
0.75 |
0.75 |
468.75 |
468.75 |
5 |
20 |
0.933 |
0.94 |
466.5 |
470 |
Average |
467.3 |
468.582 |
Here ay1=467.3 ay2=468.582
TABLE 4: ABSORBANCE OF MIXTURE (RASAGILINE AND RILUZOLE)
S. no. | Concentration of rasagiline and riluzole (mix in µg/mL) | Absorbance | Concentration obtained (µg/mL) | |||
Rasagiline | Riluzole | 265.20 nm | 263.40 nm | Rasagiline | Riluzole | |
1 | 50 | 4 | 0.1784 | 0.164 | 51.35 | 4.018 |
2 | 100 | 8 | 0.3568 | 0.328 | 102.716 | 8.156 |
3 | 150 | 12 | 0.5352 | 0.492 | 154.0744 | 12.231 |
4 | 200 | 16 | 0.7136 | 0.656 | 205.4321 | 16.313 |
5 | 250 | 20 | 0.892 | 0.82 | 256.7905 | 20.388 |
Calculation: From the above Table 2 & 3, ax1 = 31.026, ax2 = 28.212, ay1 = 467.3, ay2 = 468.58 A1=Absorbance of mixture at λmax 265.20 nm and A2=Absorbance of mixture at λmax 263.40 nm
In mixture 1:
A1= 0.1784, A2=0.164 (from Table 4)
ax1 = 31.026, ax2 = 28.212, ay1 = 467.3, ay2 = 468.58
CRasagiline = (0.164 × 467.3 – 0.1784 × 468.58) /
(28.212 × 467.3-31.026 × 468.58)
= 6.9574/1354.6954
= 0.005135mg/mL or 51.357 µg/mL
Similarly, CRiluzole = (0.1784×28.212-0.164 × 31.026) / 28.212 × 467.3-31.026 × 468.58)
= 0.0552
= 0.00047471mg/mL or 4.747µg/mL
For other mixture the calculations were done similarly as mentioned above
Method B: Area Under Curve Method (AUC):
Selection of Analytical Wavelengths: Standard stock solutions having the concentration of 10 µg/mL was prepared separately, and they were scanned in the wavelength range of 200-400 nm and the maximum (λmax) absorbance of both the drugs were found to be 265.20 nm for rasagiline and 263.40 nm for riluzole.
Preparation of Standard Stock Solution: Stock solutions of rasagiline and riluzole were prepared as discussed in method A. From rasagiline stock solution 0.5-2.5 mL and 0.4-2 mL of riluzole stock B were pipetted into 10 mL of volumetric flasks, volume was made up with methanol to get concentrations of 50-250 µg/mL of rasagiline and 4-20 µg/mL of riluzole respectively. The absorbance of the resulting solution was measured against the wavelength of 265.20 nm and 263.40 nm, respectively, against the blank methanol. The area under the curve of rasagiline and riluzole are recorded in Fig. 5 & 6.
FIG. 5: AREA UNDER CURVE FOR RASAGILINE
FIG. 6: AREA UNDER CURVE FOR RILUZOLE
Determination: Area under the curve method is mainly used for the quantification of the drugs in both single and multi-component formulation. It involves calculations of integrated values of absorbance with respect to wavelength in the indicated range.
The formula used to determine the concentration by area under the curve method is
CX = A2ay1-A1ay2/ ax2ay1-ax1ay2 or
CX = A1ay2-A2ay1/ax1ay2 –ax2ay1
Cy=A1ax2-A2ax1/ax2ay1-ax1ay2 or
Cy= A2ax1-A1ax2/ay2ax1-ay1ax2
Where,
CX= concentration of rasagiline in mixture
CY= concentration of riluzole in mixture
A1 and A2 are the areas under the curve of the sample mixture at 260.20 nm to 270.20 nm and 258.40 nm to 268.40 nm, respectively.
ax1 and ax2 are absorptivity of rasagiline and riluzole at 260.20 nm to 270.20 nm.
ay1 and ay2 are absorptivity of rasagiline and riluzole at 258.40 nm to 268.40 nm
The absorptivity values are determined by E1%1cm.
Absorptivity (E1%1cm) = (Area under curve /concentration in µg/ml) × 10000
The calibration data and calibration graph of rasagiline at 260.20 nm to 270.20 nm and 258.40 to 268.40 nm are in Tables 5 and 6, Fig. 7. Absorbance of the mixture (rasagiline and riluzole) is in Table 7.
TABLE 5: AREA UNDER CURVE OF RASAGILINE AT 260.20 -270.20 nm AND 258.40-268.40 nm
S. no. | Concentration of rasagiline (µg/mL) | Area under curve (AUC) | E1%1cm | ||
260.20-270.20 nm | 258.40-268.40 nm | 260.20-270.20 nm | 258.40-268.40 nm | ||
1 | 50 | 0.15 | 0.21 | 30 | 42 |
2 | 100 | 0.31 | 0.43 | 31 | 43 |
3 | 150 | 0.46 | 0.65 | 30.66 | 43.33 |
4 | 200 | 0.64 | 0.88 | 32 | 44 |
5 | 250 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 29.6 | 40 |
Average | 30.652 | 42.466 |
Here ax1=30.652, ax2 =42.466
FIG. 7: CALIBRATION GRAPH OF RILUZOLE
TABLE 7: AREA UNDER CURVE DATA OF RASAGILINE AND RILUZOLE
S. no. | Concentration of rasagiline and riluzole (mixture µg/mL) | AUC absorbance | Concentration obtained (µg/mL) | |||
Rasagiline | Riluzole | 260.20-270.20 nm | 258.40-268.40 nm | Rasagiline | Riluzole | |
1 | 50 | 4 | 0.26 | 0.32 | 51.55 | 4.0354 |
2 | 100 | 8 | 0.55 | 0.67 | 103.32 | 9.226 |
3 | 150 | 12 | 0.78 | 0.96 | 154.65 | 12.022 |
4 | 200 | 16 | 1.04 | 1.28 | 206.201 | 16.029 |
5 | 250 | 20 | 1.31 | 1.6 | 249.552 | 21.331 |
Calculation:
From the above Table 5 & 6, ax1 = 30.652, ax2 = 42.466, ay1 = 254.5, ay2 = 252.25,
A1 = AUC of mixture at 260.20-270.20 nm, A2 = AUC of mix at 258.40-268.40 nm
In mixture 1: A1= 0.26, A2 =0.32 (from Table 7)
CRasagiline = (0.32 × 254.5 - 0.26 × 252.25) / (42.466 × 254.5 - 30.652 × 252.25)
= 15.855/3075.63
= 0.005155 mg/mL or 51.55 µg/mL
Similarly, C Riluzole = (0.26 × 42.466 - 0.32 × 30.652) / (42.466 × 254.5 - 30.652 × 252.25)
= 1.24116/3075.63
= 0.0004035mg/mL or 4.035µg/mL
For other mixtures, the calculations were done similarly as mentioned above.
Method validation: The developed method were validated according to their analytical procedures as per ICH guidelines for validation of analytical procedures in order to determine linearity, precision, LOD, LOQ, and accuracy for the analyte.
Linearity: The linearity of an analytical procedure is its ability (within a given range) to obtain test results that are directly proportional to the concentration of analyte in the sample solution.
Preparation of Working Standards of Rasagiline and Riluzole: Working standard stock solutions of rasagiline and riluzole were prepared as discussed in method A. From rasagiline stock solution 0.5-3.5 mL and 0.4-2 mL of riluzole stock B were pipetted into 10 mL of volumetric flasks, volume was made up with methanol to get concentrations of 50-350 µg/mL of rasagiline and 4-20 µg/mL of riluzole respectively.
The absorbance of the resulting solution was measured against the wavelength of 265.20 nm and 263.40 nm respectively against the blank methanol.
The linearity data and absorbance of rasgiline are in Table 8 and Fig. 8. Similarly, for riluzole in Table 9 and Fig. 9.
TABLE 8: LINEARITY DATA OF RASAGILINE IN METHANOL
S. no. | Concentration (µg/mL) | Absorbance | E1% 1cm |
1 | 50 | 0.15 | 30 |
2 | 100 | 0.28 | 28 |
3 | 150 | 0.41 | 27.33 |
4 | 200 | 0.54 | 27 |
5 | 250 | 0.67 | 26.8 |
6 | 300 | 0.8 | 26.6 |
7 | 350 | 0.91 | 26 |
FIG. 8: ABSORBANCE LINEARITY OF RASAGILINE
TABLE 9: LINEARITY DATA OF RILUZOLE IN METHANOL
S. no. | Concentration (µg/mL) | Absorbance | E1% 1cm |
1 | 4 | 0.183 | 457.5 |
2 | 8 | 0.355 | 443.75 |
3 | 12 | 0.513 | 427.5 |
4 | 16 | 0.724 | 452.5 |
5 | 20 | 0.913 | 456.5 |
FIG. 9: ABSORBANCE LINEARITY OF RILUZOLE
Precision: Precision studies are carried out to ascertain the reproducibility of the proposed methods. Repeatability was determined by preparing six replicates of the same concentration of the sample, and the absorbance was measured.
A stock solution was prepared by dissolving 50 mg of accurately weighed rasagiline and riluzole into 50 mL volumetric flask, and the final volume was adjusted to 50 mL with methanol to get the stock solution 1000 µg/mL (stock A) concentration. From the resulting solution 2.5 mL of riluzole was placed in 25 mL volumetric flask and volume adjusted with methanol to give a solution of 100 µg/mL of riluzole solution (stock B). From stock solution, A 3.0 mL of rasagiline and 1.2 mL of riluzole of stock B were pipetted into 10 mL volumetric flask, and the volume was made up with methanol to get the concentration of 300 µg/mL of rasagiline and 12 µg/mL of riluzole. The intraday precision study was carried out by preparing drug solutions of the same concentration and analyzing it at three different times in a day Table 10 and 11.
TABLE 10: INTRADAY PRECISION DATA FOR RASAGILINE
Replicates | Absorbance | Simultaneous method | AUC | ||
Absorbance | Conc. (µg/mL) | Absorbance | Conc. (µg/mL) | ||
1 | 1 | 0.535 | 149.9 | 0.78 | 150 |
2 | 2 | 0.535 | 149.9 | 0.789 | 151.9 |
3 | 3 | 0.536 | 150.22 | 0.789 | 151.9 |
Mean | 0.535333 | 150.0067 | 0.786 | 151.2667 | |
Standard deviation | 0.000577 | 0.184752 | 0.005196 | 1.096966 | |
% RSD | 0.107849 | 0.123463 | 0.661088 | 0.725187 |
TABLE 11: INTRADAY PRECISION DATA FOR RILUZOLE
Replicates | Absorbance | Simultaneous method | AUC | ||
Absorbance | Conc. (µg/mL) | Absorbance | Conc. (µg/mL) | ||
1 | 1 | 0.552 | 12.0 | 0.96 | 12.0 |
2 | 2 | 0.553 | 12.3 | 0.965 | 12.7 |
3 | 3 | 0.554 | 12.6 | 0.965 | 12.7 |
Mean | 12.3 | 12.4 | |||
Standard deviation | 0.000567 | 0.15346 | 0.002786 | 1.0567 | |
% RSD | 0.2364 | 0.3485 | 0.64889 | 0.3556 |
To determine interday precision the same procedure was followed for three different days by following the same procedure Table 12 and 13. The results were reported as % RSD.
TABLE 12: INTERDAY PRECISION DATA FOR RASAGILINE
Replicates | Absorbance | Simultaneous method | AUC | ||
Absorbance | Conc. (µg/mL) | Absorbance | Conc. (µg/mL) | ||
1 | Day 1 | 0.535 | 149.9 | 0.78 | 150 |
2 | Day 2 | 0.535 | 149.9 | 0.789 | 151.9 |
3 | Day 3 | 0.536 | 150.22 | 0.789 | 151.9 |
Mean | 0.535333 | 150.0067 | 0.786 | 151.2667 | |
Standard deviation | 0.000577 | 0.184752 | 0.005196 | 1.096966 | |
% RSD | 0.107849 | 0.123163 | 0.661088 | 0.725187 |
TABLE 13: INTERDAY PRECISION DATA FOR RILUZOLE
Replicates | Absorbance | Simultaneous method | AUC | ||
Absorbance | Conc. (µg/mL) | Absorbance | Conc. (µg/mL) | ||
1 | Day 1 | 0.552 | 12.0 | 0.96 | 12.0 |
2 | Day 2 | 0.556 | 12.3 | 0.965 | 12.7 |
3 | Day 3 | 0.554 | 12.6 | 0.965 | 12.7 |
Mean | 12.3 | 12.4 | |||
Standard deviation | 0.0005361 | 0.1348 | 0.002785 | 1.0647 | |
% RSD | 0.3547 | 0.624 | 0.964 | 0.5826 |
Accuracy: The accuracy of an analytical procedure expresses the closeness of agreement between the value that is accepted either as a true conventional value or as an accepted reference value found. The recovery studies were carried out by adding different amounts (50%, 100%, and 150%) of the pure drug to the pre-analyzed formulation Table 14 and 15.
TABLE 14: ACCURACY DATA FOR RASAGILINE
Accuracy level | Amount added (µg/mL) | % recovery | Mean % recovery | % RSD |
I (50%) | 100.0 | 101.06±0.66 | 100.43% | 0.523 |
II (100%) | 200.0 | 100.10±0.56 | ||
III (150%) | 300.0 | 100.22±0.64 |
TABLE 15: ACCURACY DATA FOR RILUZOLE
Accuracy level | Amount added (µg/mL) | % recovery | Mean % recovery | % RSD |
I (50%) | 100.0 | 99.57±0.64 | 100.01% | 0.520 |
II (100%) | 200.0 | 100.22±0.55 | ||
III (150%) | 300.0 | 100.25±0.32 |
Ruggedness: Ruggedness expresses the variation within laboratories in analyzing the drugs in different days, by the different analyst, using different equipments, etc. The intermediate precision was performed for rasagiline and riluzole by a different analyst on a different day.
Preparation of Standard Solutions of Mixtures: The working standard solutions of rasagiline and riluzole were prepared as per the procedure mentioned in the precision method.
Determination: The resulting mixtures of samples are subjected to UV analysis by different analysts, and the obtained absorbance was recorded, and the % RSD of replicates was calculated. The results obtained were presented in Tables 16 and 17.
TABLE 16: RUGGEDNESS DATA FOR RASAGILINE AND RILUZOLE BY ANALYST 1
Concentration
(µg/mL) |
Absorbance/area | ||||
Simultaneous method | AUC | ||||
Rasagiline | Riluzole | Rasagiline | Riluzole | Rasagiline | Riluzole |
150 | 12 | 0.534 | 0.556 | 0.780 | 0.963 |
150 | 12 | 0.533 | 0.558 | 0.785 | 0.965 |
150 | 12 | 0.538 | 0.557 | 0.783 | 0.964 |
150 | 12 | 0.535 | 0.556 | 0.786 | 0.968 |
150 | 12 | 0.531 | 0.554 | 0.781 | 0.964 |
Mean | 0.5342 | 0.5562 | 0.783 | 0.9648 | |
Standard deviation | 0.002588 | 0.001483 | 0.00255 | 0.001924 | |
% RSD | 0.484544 | 0.266674 | 0.325608 | 0.199372 |
TABLE 17: RUGGEDNESS DATA FOR RASAGILINE AND RILUZOLE BY ANALYST 2
Concentration
(µg/mL) |
Absorbance/area | ||||
Simultaneous method | AUC | ||||
Rasagiline | Riluzole | Rasagiline | Riluzole | Rasagiline | Riluzole |
150 | 12 | 0.531 | 0.555 | 0.781 | 0.962 |
150 | 12 | 0.538 | 0.553 | 0.783 | 0.963 |
150 | 12 | 0.536 | 0.556 | 0.783 | 0.965 |
150 | 12 | 0.534 | 0.551 | 0.786 | 0.968 |
150 | 12 | 0.539 | 0.552 | 0.782 | 0.963 |
Mean | 0.5356 | 0.5534 | 0.783 | 0.9642 | |
Standard deviation | 0.003209 | 0.002074 | 0.001871 | 0.002387 | |
% RSD | 0.599209 | 0.37471 | 0.238931 | 0.247611 |
Limit of Detection and Limit of Quantification: Limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were determined based on the standard deviation of response and the slope and were calculated by using the equation
LOD = 3 × s/S and LOQ = 10 × s/S
Where s is the standard deviation of intercept and S is the slope of the line
RESULTS: Rasagiline and Riluzole were individually analyzed by UV-Visible spectrophoto-metric method using the solvent methanol. Optical characteristics such as λmax, E1%1cm, slope intercept, correlation coefficient, linearity and range, LOD and LOQ were observed as in Table 18 and 19.
TABLE 18: RASAGILINE CALIBRATION DATA
Parameters | Simultaneous method | AUC |
λmax (nm) | 265.20 | 260.20-270.20 |
E1% 1cm | 31.026 | 30.652 |
Slope | 0.0026 | 0.003 |
Intercept | 0.0257 | 0.0052 |
Correlation coefficient | 0.9995 | 0.9994 |
Linearity | 50-350 | 50-350 |
LOD (µg/mL) | 0.79 | 1.4 |
LOQ (µg/mL) | 1.17 | 4.3 |
The mixture of rasagiline and riluzole was analyzed by UV-Visible spectroscopic method using simultaneous equation method and area under the curve method (AUC). These methods were validated according to the ICH guidelines. The observed results of the developed and validated methods in the present study suggest that these methods can be adopted for routine analysis of drugs simultaneously.
TABLE 19: RILUZOLE CALIBRATION DATA
Parameters | Simultaneous method | AUC |
λmax (nm) | 263.40 | 258.40-268.40 |
E1% 1cm | 468.58 | 252.25 |
Slope | 0.0546 | 0.0256 |
Intercept | 0.0048 | 0.0024 |
Correlation coefficient | 0.9995 | 0.9998 |
Linearity | 4-20 | 4-20 |
LOD (µg/mL) | 0.55 | 0.58 |
LOQ (µg/mL) | 1.695 | 0.98 |
CONCLUSION: A physical mixture was prepared in the laboratories of Govt. College of Pharmacy as no combined dosage forms of rasagiline and riluzole are available in the market. As spectroscopic methods are highly powerful and convenient methods of analysis, in the present study, two different such methods were developed and validated for routine analysis of rasagiline and riluzole in their bulk and physical mixtures. In the simultaneous equation method, different wavelengths are selected to calculate their concentrations in both bulk and in combination.
The simultaneous equation method is extended to calculate the concentration as the area under the curve method at a wavelength of ±5 nm λmax of rasagiline and riluzole. These developed methods are economical, accurate, and precise. From the observations of both methods developed and validated, they may be used for routine analysis of rasagiline and riluzole simultaneously at the industrial level in their dosage forms.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Authors are thankful to the Principal, Govt. College of Pharmacy Bangalore for his constant support and encouragement in our research work and for providing laboratory facilities to complete the present research work. The authors are also thankful to Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka, for their financial support.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: Authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
REFERENCES:
- Urushitani M, Sik A, Sakurai T, Nukina N, Takahashi R and Julien JP: Chromogranin-mediated secretion of mutant superoxide dismutase proteins linked to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature Neuroscience 2006; 9(1): 108-18.
- Ludolph AC, Schuster J, Dorst J, Dupuis L, Dreyhaupt J, Weishaupt JH, Kassubek J, Weiland U, Petri S, Meyer T and Grosskreutz J: Safety and efficacy of rasagiline as an add-on therapy to riluzole in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. The Lancet Neurology 2018; 17(8): 681-8.
- Weinreb O, Amit T, Bar-Am O and Youdim MB: Rasagiline: a novel anti-Parkinsonian monoamine oxidase-B inhibitor with neuroprotective activity. Prog Neurobiol 2010; 92(3): 330-44.
- Leegwater-Kim J and Bortan E: The role of rasagiline in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Clin Interv Aging 2010; 5: 149-56.
- Chen JJ, Swope DM and Dashtipour K: Comprehensive review of rasagiline, a second-generation monoamine oxidase inhibitor, for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Clin Ther 2007; 29(9): 1825-49.
- National Center for Biotechnology Information. "PubChem Compound Summary for CID 5070, Riluzole" PubChem, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Riluzole. 6 April, 2021.
- Coric V, Taskiran S, Pittenger C, Wasylink S, Mathalon DH, Valentine G, Saksa J, Wu YT, Gueorguieva R, Sanacora G, Malison RT and Krystal JH: Riluzole augmentation in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: an open-label trial. Biol Psychiatry 2005; 58(5): 424-8.
- Van Kan HJ, Groeneveld GJ, Kalmijn S, Spieksma M, van den Berg LH and Guchelaar HJ: Association between CYP1A2 activity and riluzole clearance in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2005; 59(3): 310-3.
- Zarate CA Jr, Payne JL, Quiroz J, Sporn J, Denicoff KK, Luckenbaugh D, Charney DS and Manji HK: An open-label trial of riluzole in patients with treatment-resistant major depression. Am J Psychiatry 2004; 161(1): 171-4.
- Mathew SJ, Manji HK and Charney DS: Novel drugs and therapeutic targets for severe mood disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 2008; 33(9): 2080-92.
- Lamanauskas N and Nistri A: Riluzole blocks persistent Na+ and Ca2+ currents and modulates release of glutamate via presynaptic NMDA receptors on neonatal rat hypoglossal motoneurons in-vitro. Eur J Neurosci 2008; 27(10): 2501-14.
- Waibel S, Reuter A, Malessa S, Blaugrund E and Ludolph AC: Rasagiline alone and in combination with riluzole prolongs survival in an ALS mouse model. Journal of Neurology 2004; 251(9): 1080-4.
- Rama B and Preeti K: UV spectrophotometric method for the determination of rasagiline mesylate in bulk and pharmaceutical formulations. Int J of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research 2010; 5(1): 5-7.
- Kepekci Tekkeli SE, Önal A and Bahadori F: Development and validation of spectrophotometric methods for the determination of rasagiline in pharmaceutical preparations Journal of Spectroscopy 2013; 1-8.
- Balaji N, Sivaraman VR and Neeraja P: Development and Validation of a Stability- Indicating RP-UPLC Method for the Quantitative Analysis of antiparkinson drug and its related impurities. IOSR J Applied Chem 2013; 3: 14-21.
- Saminathan J and Vetrichelvan T: Validation of UV spectrophotometric method for determination of riluzole in pharmaceutical dosage form. International Journal of Chem Tech Research 2011; 3(2): 560-4.
- Sharma MC and Sharma S: Validation of UV Spectrophotometric Method for Determination of Riluzole Pharmaceutical Formulation as Hydrotropic Solubilizing Agents. World Journal of Chemistry 2011; 6(2): 85-90.
How to cite this article:
Dhanwad R, Deepali, Harini L and Chaluvaraju KC: Development and validation of spectroscopic methods for the simultaneous estimation of rasagiline and riluzole. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2021; 12(11): 6028-36. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.12(11).6028-36.
All © 2021 are reserved by the International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
44
6028-6036
677 KB
470
English
IJPSR
Ramgopal Dhanwad, Deepali, L. Harini and K. C. Chaluvaraju *
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Govt. College of Pharmacy, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
chaluvarajukc@gmail.com
03 January 2021
09 April 2021
26 May 2021
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.12(11).6028-36
01 November 2021