DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF STABILITY INDICATING ASSAY FOR SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF PENTAPRAZOLE, DICLOFENAC, CHLOROXAZONE IN PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE FORM BY USING RP-HPLC
HTML Full TextDEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF STABILITY INDICATING ASSAY FOR SIMUL-TANEOUS DETERMINATION OF PENTAPRAZOLE, DICLOFENAC, CHLOROXAZONE IN PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE FORM BY USING RP-HPLC
Padmavathi Sakinala *, Harini Vahika, K. Santhosh and Sandeep Attinti
Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Nirmala College of Pharmacy, Mangalagiri, Guntur - 522503, Andhra Pradesh, India.
ABSTRACT: Objective: A simple, accurate, precise method was developed for the simultaneous estimation of the Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole, and Diclofenac in solid dosage form. Method: Chromatogram was run through BDS C18 150 × 4.6 mm, 5 m. Mobile phase containing 0.01% KH2PO4 and Acetonitrile in the ratio of 52:48 v/v was pumped through column at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. The buffer used in this method was 0.01%. KH2PO4, Temperature was maintained at 30 °C. The optimized wavelength for Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole, and Diclofenac was 229.0 nm. Results: Retention time of Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole, and Diclofenac were found to be 2.229 min, 2.958 min, and 3.568 min. % RSD of system precision for Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole and Diclofenac were and found to be 0.9, 0.6 and 0.6, respectively. % RSD of method precision for Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole and Diclofenac were and found to be 0.6, 1.0 and 0.7 respectively. % recovery was obtained as 99.86%, 100.07% and 99.70% for Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole, and Diclofenac respectively. LOD values are obtained from regression equations of Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole and Diclofenac were 0.14 ppm, 0.24 ppm, 1.83 pm, and LOQ values are obtained from regression equations of Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole and Diclofenac were 0.42 ppm, 0.72 pm, 5.53 ppm respectively. The regression equation of Chlorzoxazone was y = 8321.9.x + 1397.8Pantoprazolee was y = 9806.1x + 6071.7 and of Diclofenac was y = 2575x + 4338.4. Conclusion: Retention times are decreased so the method developed was simple and economical that can be adopted in regular Quality control test in Industries.
Keywords: |
Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole, Diclofenac, RP-HPLC
INTRODUCTION: Analytical chemistry is a branch of chemistry that deals with the identification of compounds and mixtures (qualitative analysis) or the determination of the proportions of the constituents (quantitative analysis).
The techniques commonly used are titration, precipitation, spectroscopy, chromatography, etc. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is the fastest-growing analytical technique for analysis of drugs 1. Its simplicity, high specificity and wide range of sensitivity make it ideal for the analysis of many drugs in both dosage forms and biological fluids 2.
The reasons for the popularity of the method are its sensitivity, its ready adaptability to accurate quantitative determinations, its suitability for separating non-volatile species or thermally fragile ones and its widespread applicability to substances that are of prime interest to the industry 3. Sensitive detectors have transformed liquid column chromatography into high speed, efficient, accurate and highly resolved methods of separation 4. The HPLC is the method of choice in the field of analytical chemistry since this method is specific, robust, linear, precise and accurate and the limit of detection is low. The present aim of the study was the simultaneous estimation of the drug Chlorzoxazone. Pantoprazole and Diclofenac sodium by using RP-HPLC method 5.
Chlorzoxazone: Chlorzoxazone is a centrally acting central muscle relaxant with a sedative drug. It is inhibiting the muscle spasm by exerting an effect primarily at the level of the spinal cord and subcortical areas of the brain. Chlorzoxazone is having molecular weight 169.57, Molecular Formula C7H4ClNO2, IUPAC Name: 5-chloro-2, 3-dihydro-1, 3- benzoxazol-2- one. The solubility of chlorzoxazone was in DMSO, ethanol, and methanol and pKa value were 9.396.
Structure:
FIG. 1: STRUCTURE OF CHLORZOXAZONE
Pantoprazole: Pantoprazole is a proton pump inhibitor drug used for short-term treatment of erosion and ulceration of the esophagus caused by gastroesophageal reflux disease. The Pantoprazole is having molecular Weight 383.37, Molecular Formula C16H15F2N3O4S, IUPAC Name 6-(Difluoromethoxy)-2- [(3, 4-dimethoxypyridin-2-yl) methanesulfinyl]-1H-1, 3-benzodiazole 7. The solubility of pantoprazole was in methanol, pKa value was 6.43.
Structure:
FIG. 2: STRUCTURE OF PANTOPRAZOLE
Diclofenac: Diclofenac is non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent (NSAID) with antipyretic and analgesic actions. Diclofenac is having Molecular Weight 296.15, Molecular formula: C14H11Cl2NO2 IUPAC Name: 2-{2-[(2, 6-dichlorophenyl) amino] phenyl} acetic acid. It is soluble in water and is having pKa value: 4.08.
Structure:
FIG. 3: STRUCTURE OF DICLOFENAC
MATERIALS AND METHOD:
Materials and Instruments: The materials used were AR grade or the best possible Pharma grade available and they are supplied by the manufacturer or supplier SD fine, Sigma Aldrich. The chemicals used are Water–HPLC grade, Acetonitrile, Triethylamine, Potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate, Orthophosphoric acid. Instruments used were Electronics Balance, pH meter, Waters HPLC2695 series with quaternary pumps, Photo Diode array detector, and autosampler integrated with empowering software, Ultra sonicator. UV double beam spectrophotometer with UV win 5.
General Procedure:
Sample Processing:
Diluents: Based upon the solubility of the drug diluents was selected0.03N KH2PO4: Acetonitrile (50:50 v/v)
0.03N KH2PO4 Buffer: Accurately weighed 4.08 gm of Potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate in a 1000 ml of volumetric flask add about 900 ml of milli-Q water added and degas to sonicate and finally make up the volume with water.
Preparation of Standard Stock Solutions: Accurately weighed 5 mg of Chlorzoxazone, 12.5 mg of Pantoprazole and 125 mg of Diclofenac and transferred to three 25 ml volumetric flasks separately. 10 ml of diluents were added to flasks and sonicated for 20 min. Flasks were made up with 0.03N KH2PO4: Acetonitrile (50:50 v/v) and labeled as Standard stock solutions 1, 2, and 3.
Preparation of Standard Working Solutions (100% Solution): 1 ml from each stock solution was pipette out and taken into a 10 ml volumetric flask and made up with 0.03 N KH2PO4: Acetonitrile (50:50 v/v)
Preparation of Sample Stock Solutions: 5 tablets were weighed and calculate the average weight of each tablet then the weight equivalent to 1 tablet was transferred into a 100 mL volumetric flask, 25 mL of diluents was added and sonicated for 50 min, further the volume made up with diluent and filtered.
Preparation of Sample Working Solutions (100% Solution): From the filtered solution 1 ml was pipetted out into a 10 ml volumetric flask and made up to 10 ml with diluents (20 ppm, 50 ppm, and 500 ppm).
Preparation of Buffer:
0.1% OPA Buffer: 1 ml of orthophosphoric acid was diluted to 1000 ml with HPLC grade water.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In the estimation of the three drugs four trails were conducted by using various solvent systems, columns, and experimental conditions. Finally in the optimized method the solvent system used was 0.01% KH2PO4: Acetonitrile (52:48 v/v), and other conditioned are represented in Table 1. Chromatograms of blank and placebo were showed in Fig. 4 and 5.
TABLE1: OPTIMIZED METHOD
Column Used | BDS C18 150 × 4.6 mm, 5 m |
Mobile phase | 0.01% KH2PO4: Acetonitrile (52:48 v/v) |
Flow rate | 1.0 ml/min |
Diluent | 0.01 N KH2PO4: Acetonitrile (50:50 v/v) |
Wavelength | 229.0 nm |
Temperature | 30 °C |
Injection Volume | 10.0 µl |
Run time | 7.0 Min |
Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole, and Diclofenac were eluted at 2.221 min, 2.968 min, and 3.584 min, respectively with good resolution. The plate count and tailing factor were very satisfactory, so this method was optimized and to be validated. This method was optimized, and drugs were eluted with good retention time, resolution; all the system suitable parameters like Plate count and Tailing factor were within limits, it was shown in the Fig. 6.
Validation:
System Suitability Parameters: The system suitability parameters were determined by preparing standard solutions of Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole, and Diclofenac and the solutions were injected six times, and the parameters like peak tailing, resolution and USP plate count were determined. The % RSD for the area of six standard injections was not more than 2%. Plate count of the Chlorzoxazone Was 5439 ± 300, Pantoprazole was 4574 ± 300 and of Diclofenac was 6139 ± 300, tailing factor of Chlorzoxazone was 1.05 ± 0.2, Pantoprazole was 1.04 ± 0.2, and of Diclofenac was 1.220.1, resolution between Chlorzoxazone and Pantoprazole was 3.6 and resolution between Pantoprazole and Dilcofenac was 5.4. According to ICH guidelines plate count should be more than 2000, tailing factor should be less than 2 and resolution must be more than 2. All the system suitable parameters were passed and they were within the limits. They were shown in Table 2, Fig. 7.
TABLE 2: SYSTEM SUITABILITY PARAMETERS
S. no. | Chlorzoxazone | Pantoprazole | Diclofenac | ||||||
Inj | RT (min) | TP | Tailing | RT (min) | TP | Tailing | RT (min) | TP | Tailing |
1 | 2.220 | 2780 | 1.17 | 3.540 | 5241 | 1.22 | 2.937 | 4376 | 1.28 |
2 | 2.223 | 2817 | 1.18 | 3.546 | 5116 | 1.21 | 2.943 | 4610 | 1.27 |
3 | 2.223 | 3010 | 1.21 | 3.546 | 5214 | 1.23 | 2.944 | 4808 | 1.27 |
4 | 2.225 | 3023 | 1.13 | 3.548 | 5730 | 1.20 | 2.944 | 4383 | 1.28 |
5 | 2.225 | 2996 | 1.13 | 3.554 | 4891 | 1.20 | 2.949 | 4242 | 1.26 |
6 | 2.229 | 3083 | 1.15 | 3.568 | 5246 | 1.21 | 2.958 | 4540 | 1.26 |
FIG. 7: SYSTEM SUITABILITY CHROMATOGRAM
Precision:
Preparation of Standard Stock Solutions: Accurately weighed 5 mg of Chlorzoxazone, 12.5 mg of Pantoprazole, and 125 mg of Diclofenac and transferred to three 25 ml volumetric flasks separately. 10 ml of diluent was added to flasks and sonicated for 15 min. Flasks were made up with 0.03 N KH2PO4: Acetonitrile (50:50 v/v) and labeled as Standard stock solutions 1, 2, and 3.
Preparation of Standard Working Solutions (100% Solution): 1 ml from each standard stock solution was pipette out and taken into a 10 ml volumetric flask and made up with KH2PO4: Acetonitrile (20 ppm, 50 ppm, and 500 ppm).
Preparation of Sample Stock Solutions: 5 tablets were weighed and calculate the average weight of each tablet, then the weight equivalent to 1 tablet was transferred into a 100 mL volumetric flask, 25 mL of diluent added and sonicated for 50 min; further the volume made up with diluent and filtered.
Preparation of Sample Working Solutions (100% Solution): 1 ml of filtered sample stock solution was transferred to 10 ml volumetric flask and made up with diluents (20 ppm, 50 ppm, and 500 ppm).
TABLE 3: PRECISION VALUES
S.
no. |
Area of Chlorzoxazone | Area of Pantoprazole | Area of Diclofenac |
1 | 171126 | 500143 | 1290245 |
2. | 172435 | 495628 | 1293549 |
3. | 172284 | 500766 | 1301289 |
4. | 169409 | 492683 | 1304374 |
5 | 169122 | 497427 | 1285299 |
6. | 169432 | 496587 | 1289128 |
Mean | 170536 | 497206 | 1293981 |
S.D | 1512.6 | 2989.3 | 7409.4 |
% RSD | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
From a single volumetric flask of working standard solution, six injections were given, and the obtained areas were mentioned above Table 3. Average area, standard deviation, and % RSD were calculated for three drugs and obtained as 0.9%, 0.6%, and 0.6% respectively for Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole and Diclofenac. As the limit of Precision was less than “2” the system precision was passed in this method.
Linearity:
Preparation of Standard Stock Solutions: Accurately weighed 5mg of Chlorzoxazone, 12.5 mg of Pantoprazole, and 125 mg of Diclofenac and transferred to three 25 ml volumetric flasks separately. 10 ml of diluent was added to flasks and sonicated for 15 min. Flasks were made up with 0.03N KH2PO4: Acetonitrile (50:50 v/v) and labeled as Standard stock solutions 1, 2, and 3.
25% Standard Solution: 0.25 ml each from three standard stock solutions was pipette out and made up to 10 ml.
50% Standard Solution: 0.5 ml each from three standard stock solutions was pipette out and made up to 10 ml.
75% Standard Solution: 0.75 ml each from three standard stock solutions was pipette out and made up to 10 ml.
100% Standard Solution: 1.0 ml each from three standard stock solutions was pipette out and made up to 10 ml.
125% Standard Solution: 1.25 ml each from three standard stock solutions was pipette out and made up to 10 ml.
150% Standard Solution: 1.5 ml each from three standard stock solutions was pipette out and made up to 10 ml.
TABLE 4: LINEARITY FOR CHLORZOXAZONE, PANTOPRAZOLE AND DICLOFENAC
Chlorzoxazone. | Pantoprazole | Diclofenac | |||
Conc. (μg/mL) | Peak area | Conc. (μg/mL) | Peak area | Conc. (μg/mL) | Peak area |
5 | 43034 | 12.5 | 131545 | 125 | 325141 |
10 | 86532 | 25 | 260353 | 250 | 654346 |
15 | 124455 | 37.5 | 370105 | 375 | 975309 |
20 | 171308 | 50 | 496077 | 500 | 1296108 |
25 | 208420 | 62.5 | 616050 | 625 | 1595660 |
30 | 249841 | 75 | 742462 | 750 | 1943275 |
Six linear concentrations of Chlorzoxazone. (5-30 µg/ml), Pantoprazole (12.5.75 µg/ml) and Diclo-fenac (125-750 µg/ml) were injected in a triplicate manner Table 4. Average areas were mentioned above, and linearity equations obtained for Chlorzoxazone were y = 8321.9.x + 1397.8 Fig. 8. Pantoprazole was y = 9806.1x + 6071 Fig. 9 and of Diclofenac was y = 2575x + 4338.4 Fig. 10. The correlation coefficient obtained was 0.999 for all the three drugs.
Accuracy:
Preparation of Standard Stock Solutions: Accurately weighed 5 mg of Chlorzoxazone 12.5 mg of Pantoprazole and 125 mg of Diclofenac and transferred to three 25 ml volumetric flasks separately. 10 ml of diluent was added to flasks and sonicated for 15 min. Flasks were made up with 0.03 N KH2PO4: Acetonitrile (50:50 v/v) and labeled as Standard stock solutions 1, 2 and 3.
Preparation of 50% Spiked Solution: 0.5 ml of sample stock solution was taken into a 10 ml volumetric flask, to that 1.0 ml from each standard stock solution was pipette out, and made up to the mark with diluent.
Preparation of 100% Spiked Solution: 1.0 ml of sample stock solution was taken into a 10 ml volumetric flask, to that 1.0 ml from each standard stock solution was pipette out, and made up to the mark with diluents.
Preparation of 150% Spiked Solution: 1.5 ml of sample stock solution was taken into a 10 ml volumetric flask, to that 1.0 ml from each standard stock solution was pipette out, and made up to the mark with diluents.
Acceptance Criteria: The % Recovery for each level should be between 98.0 to 102
TABLE 5: ACCURACY OF CHLORZOXAZONE
% Level | Amount Spiked (μg/mL) | Amount recovered (μg/mL) | % Recovery | Mean %Recovery |
50% | 10 | 10.02 | 100.17 | 99.86% |
10 | 9.92 | 99.19 | ||
10 | 10.01 | 100.07 | ||
100% | 20 | 19.95 | 99.77 | |
20 | 20.35 | 101.77 | ||
20 | 20.05 | 100.27 | ||
150% | 30 | 29.52 | 98.39 | |
30 | 29.91 | 99.69 | ||
30 | 29.82 | 99.41 |
TABLE 6: ACCURACY OF PANTOPRAZOLE
% Level | Amount Spiked (μg/mL) | Amount recovered (μg/mL) | % Recovery | Mean %Recovery |
50% | 25 | 25.07 | 100.28 | 100.07% |
25 | 25.50 | 101.98 | ||
25 | 24.93 | 99.74 | ||
100% | 50 | 49.68 | 99.37 | |
50 | 49.89 | 99.77 | ||
50 | 50.45 | 100.90 | ||
150% | 75 | 75.06 | 100.08 | |
75 | 74.38 | 99.17 | ||
75 | 74.54 | 99.38 |
TABLE 7: ACCURACY OF DICLOFENAC
% Level | Amount Spiked (μg/mL) | Amount recovered (μg/mL) | % Recovery | Mean %Recovery |
50% | 250 | 251.09 | 100.44 | 99.70% |
250 | 248.23 | 99.29 | ||
250 | 248.68 | 99.47 | ||
100% | 500 | 502.58 | 100.52 | |
500 | 496.16 | 99.23 | ||
500 | 501.92 | 100.38 | ||
150% | 750 | 746.77 | 99.57 | |
750 | 740.70 | 98.76 | ||
750 | 747.37 | 99.65 |
Three levels of Accuracy sample were prepared by the standard addition method. Triplicate injections were given for each level of accuracy and mean % Recovery was obtained as 99.86%, 100.07% and 99.70% for Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole, and Diclofenac respectively. The results were shown in Table 5, 6 and 7. Robustness conditions like Flow minus (0/65 ml/min), Flow plus (0.85 ml/min), mobile phase minus, mobile phase plus, temperature minus (25 °C), and temperature plus (35 °C) was maintained and samples were injected in duplicate manner. System suitability parameters were not much affected, and all the parameters were passed. % RSD was within the limit. The results were shown in Table 8.
TABLE 8: ROBUSTNESS DATA FOR CHLORZOXAZONE, PANTOPRAZOLE AND DILCOFENAC
S. no. | Condition | % RSD of Chlorzoxazone | % RSD of Pantoprazole | % RSD of Diclofenac |
1 | Flow rate (-) 0.65 ml/min | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
2 | Flow rate (+) 0.85 ml/min | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.5 |
3 | Mobile phase (-) 53B:47A | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.9 |
4 | Mobile phase (+) 63B:37A | 0.3 | 1.3 | 0.7 |
5 | Temperature (-) 25°C | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.3 |
6 | Temperature (+) 35°C | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
Robustness conditions like Flow minus (0.65 ml/min), Flow plus (0.85 ml/min), mobile phase minus (53B:47A), mobile phase plus (63B:37A), temperature minus (25 °C) and temperature plus (35 °C) was maintained and samples were injected in a duplicate manner. System suitability parameters were not much affected and all the parameters were passed. % RSD was within the limit.
Sensitivity:
LOD Sample Preparation: 0.25 ml each from three standard stock solutions was pipette out and transferred to 3 separate 10 ml volumetric flask and made up with diluents from the above solutions 0.1 ml, 0.1 ml and 0.1 ml of Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole and Dilcofenac solutions respectively were transferred to 10 ml volumetric flasks and made up with the same diluents. LOD values are obtained from regression equations of Chlorzoxa-zone, Pantoprazole, and Diclofenac were 0.14 ppm, 0.24 ppm, 1.83 pm. The result was depicted in Fig. 11.
LOQ Sample Preparation: 0.25 ml each from three standard stock solutions was pipette out and transferred to 3 separate 10 ml volumetric flask and made up with diluents from the above solutions 0.3 ml, 0.3 ml and 0.3 ml of Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole and Dilcofenac solutions respectively were transferred to 10 ml volumetric flasks and made up with the same diluents.
LOQ values are obtained from regression equations of Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole and Diclofenac were 0.42 ppm, 0.72 pm, 5.53 ppm respectively. The chromatogram was shown in Fig. 12. The result of sensitivity was depicted in Table 9.
TABLE 9: SENSITIVITY TABLE OF CHLORZOXAZONE, PANTOPRAZOLE AND DILCOFENAC
Molecule | LOD (µg/ml) | LOQ (µg/ml) |
Chlorzoxazone | 0.14 µg/ml | 0.42 µg/ml |
Pantoprazole | 0.24 µg/ml | 0.72 µg/ml |
Dilcofenac | 1.83 µg/ml | 5.53 µg/ml |
Assay: Alldex DT plus (50 + 20 + 500) the label claim Pantoprazole 50 mg Chlorzoxazone20mg Diclofenac 500 mg per unit formulation Assay was performed with the above formulation. Average % Assay for Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole, and Diclofenac. Obtained was 99.28%, 99.24% and 100.12% respectively. The results were shown in Tables 10, 11 and 12.
TABLE 10: ASSAY DATA OF CHLORZOXAZONE
S. no. | Standard Area | Sample area | % Assay |
1 | 171126 | 168913 | 98.85 |
2 | 172435 | 170840 | 99.98 |
3 | 172284 | 171067 | 100.11 |
4 | 169409 | 170128 | 99.56 |
5 | 169122 | 169928 | 99.44 |
6 | 169432 | 171996 | 100.65 |
Avg | 170536 | 170479 | 99.77 |
Stdev | 1512.6 | 1063.6 | 0.622 |
%RSD | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
TABLE 11: ASSAY DATA OF PANTOPRAZOLE
S. no. | Standard Area | Sample area | % Assay |
1 | 500143 | 494402 | 99.24 |
2 | 495628 | 508518 | 102.07 |
3 | 500766 | 501974 | 100.76 |
4 | 492683 | 506325 | 101.63 |
5 | 497427 | 500386 | 100.44 |
6 | 496587 | 504538 | 101.27 |
Avg | 497206 | 502691 | 100.90 |
Stdev | 2989.3 | 5002.1 | 1.00 |
% RSD | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
TABLE 12: ASSAY DATA OF DICLOFENAC
S. no. | Standard Area | Sample area | % Assay |
1 | 1290245 | 1288257 | 99.46 |
2 | 1293549 | 1302223 | 100.54 |
3 | 1301289 | 1302368 | 100.55 |
4 | 1304374 | 1311342 | 101.24 |
5 | 1285299 | 1290713 | 99.65 |
6 | 1289128 | 1290961 | 99.67 |
Avg | 1293981 | 1297644 | 100.18 |
Stdev | 7409.4 | 9074.5 | 0.701 |
% RSD | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
Degradation Studies: Degradation studies were performed at different conditioned such as degradation by hydrogen peroxide, acid, alkali, neural, dry heat, photo radiations the results were shown in Table 13, 14, and 15.
Acid Degradation Studies: To 1 ml of stock solution Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole, and Diclofenac, 1 ml of 2 N Hydrochloric acid was added and refluxed for 30 min at 60 °C. The resultant solution was diluted to obtain 5 µg/ml, 60 µg/ml and 5 µg/ml of all components and 10 µl solutions were injected into the system and the chromate grams were recorded to assess the stability of the sample. The result was showed in Fig. 13.
Alkali Degradation Studies: To 1 ml of stock solution Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole, and Diclofenac, 1 ml of 2 N sodium hydroxide was added and refluxed for 30 min at 60 °C. The resultant solution was diluted to obtain 5 µg/ml, 60 µg/ml and 5 µg/ml of all components and 10 µl were injected into the system, and the chromato-grams were recorded to assess the stability of sample. The result was showed in Fig. 14.
Oxidation: To 1 ml of stock solutions of Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole and Dilcofenac. 1 ml of 20% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) were added separately. The solutions were kept for 30 min at 60 °C. For HPLC study, the resultant solution was diluted to obtain 5 µg/ml, 60 µg/ml and 5 µg/ml of all components and 10 µl were injected into the system and the chromatograms were recorded to assess the stability of sample. The result was showed in Fig. 15.
Dry Heat Degradation Studies: The standard drug solution was placed in an oven at 105 °C for 1 h to study dry heat degradation. For HPLC study, the resultant solution was diluted obtain 5 µg/ml, 60 µg/ml and 5 µg/ml of all components and 10 µl were injected into the system and the chromate grams were recorded to assess the stability of the sample. The result was showed in Fig. 16.
Photo Stability Studies: The photochemical stability of the drug was also studied by exposing the 50 µg/ml, 600 µg/ml, and 50 µg/ml solution to UV Light by keeping the beaker in UV Chamber for 1 day or 200 Watt h/m2 in photostability chamber. For HPLC study, the resultant solution was diluted to obtain 5 µg/ml, 60 µg/ml and 5 µg/ml of all components and 10 µl were injected into the system, and the chromatograms were recorded to assess the stability of sample. The result was showed in Fig. 16.
Neutral Degradation Studies: Stress testing under neutral conditions was studied by refluxing the drug in water for 6 h at a temperature of 60 °C. For HPLC study, the resultant solution was diluted to obtain 5 µg/ml, 60 µg/ml and 5 µg/ml of all components and 10 µl were injected into the system, and the chromate grams were recorded to assess the stability of the sample. The result was showed in Fig. 17.
TABLE 13: DEGRADATION DATA OF CHLORZOXAZONE
S. no. | Degradation Condition | % Drug Degraded | Purity Angle | Purity Threshold |
1 | Acid | 2.45 | 0.204 | 0.273 |
2 | Alkali | 2.14 | 0.247 | 0.267 |
3 | Oxidation | 5.14 | 0.231 | 0.293 |
4 | Thermal | 3.94 | 0.108 | 0.268 |
5 | UV | 0.72 | 0.120 | 0.268 |
6 | Water | 0.02 | 0.115 | 0.270 |
TABLE 14: DEGRADATION DATA OF PANTOPRAZOLE
S. no. | Degradation Condition | % Drug Degraded | Purity Angle | Purity Threshold |
1 | Acid | 3.84 | 0.303 | 0.424 |
2 | Alkali | 5.64 | 0.276 | 0.435 |
3 | Oxidation | 4.88 | 0.307 | 0.393 |
4 | Thermal | 1.24 | 0.247 | 0.398 |
5 | UV | 0.95 | 0.231 | 0.390 |
6 | Water | 0.95 | 0.238 | 0.386 |
TABLE 15: DEGRADATION DATA OF DICLOFENAC
S. no. | Degradation Condition | % Drug Degraded | Purity Angle | Purity Threshold |
1 | Acid | 5.70 | 0.305 | 0.334 |
2 | Alkali | 7.87 | 0.143 | 0.327 |
3 | Oxidation | 4.57 | 0.234 | 0.397 |
4 | Thermal | 2.18 | 0.136 | 0.307 |
5 | UV | 0.93 | 0.132 | 0.302 |
6 | Water | 0.54 | 0.140 | 0.303 |
FIG. 17: UV DEGRADATION CHROMATOGRAM OF CHLORZOXAZONE, PANTOPRAZOLE AND DICLOFENAC
CONCLUSION: A simple, accurate, precise method was developed for the simultaneous estimation of the Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole, and Diclofenac in tablet dosage form. The retention time of Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole and Diclofenac were found to be 2.229 min, 2.958 min, and 3.568 min. % RSD of system precision for Chlorzoxa-zone, Pantoprazole and Diclofenac were and found to be 0.9, 0.6 and 0.6 respectively. % RSD of method precision for Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole and Diclofenac were and found to be 0.6, 1.0 and 0.7 respectively. % recovery was obtained as 99.86%, 100.07% and 99.70% for Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole, and Diclofenac respectively.
LOD values are obtained from regression equations of Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole and Diclofenac were 0.14 ppm, 0.24 ppm and 1.83 ppm and LOQ values are obtained from regression equations of Chlorzoxazone, Pantoprazole and Diclofenac were 0.42 ppm, 0.72 ppm, and 5.53 ppm respectively. The regression equation of Chlorzoxazone was y = 8321.9.x + 1397.8 Pantoprazolee was y = 9806.1x + 6071.7 and of Diclofenac was y = 2575x + 4338.4. Retention times are decreased so the method developed was simple and economical that can be adopted in regular Quality control tests in Industries.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Authors are thankful to the Spectram Laboratories, Hyderabad.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: Authors are not having any conflict of interest. All authors contributed the work, and all worked together in the preparation of abstracts, experimental work, writing the paper. All authors equally contributed the work and are given support to complete the project.
All are given moral support to put my views in writing the paper. During my research work and the writing of the research paper, every author played key role and they are encouraged me in every aspect of this tenure.
REFERENCES:
- Patel J and Patel P: RP- HPLC method development and validation for the estimation of diclofenac sodium, tramadol hydrochloride and chlorzoxazone from their combined tablet dosage form. Int Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2017; 6(7): 632-37.
- Tuwfeeq B: Development and validation of a new HPLC analytical method for the determination of diclofenac in tablets. Saudi Pharma 2019; 27(1): 66-70.
- Patel RA and Joshi SH: Development and validation of spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous estimation of diclofenac sodium and serratiopeptidase in the pharmaceutical dosage form. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2014; 3(5): 1279-91.
- Alia F, Singha GN, Sahua PL, Prakasha A, Trivedia M and Khana TA: Stability-indicating RP-HPLC method development for the estimation of pantoprazole sodium in tablet dosage form. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2015; 4(8): 1145-52.
- Arige SS, Arige SD and Rao LA: Method development and validation of simultaneous estimation of pantoprazole sodium and levosulpiride in combined dosage form by RP-HPLC method. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2017; 6(7): 913-23.
- Macharla S and Bairam R: Analytical method development and validation for simultaneous estimation of cinitapride hydrogen tartrate and pantoprazole sodium in pharmaceutical dosage form by RP-HPLC. Der Pharma Chemica 2018; 10(8), 1123-28.
- Mohamad I, Walash and Ibrahum F: Development and validation of HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of famotidine, paracetamol and diclofenac in their raw materials and pharmaceutical formulation. Tylor and Francis Online 2017; 7(3): 421-32.
- El-Gindy A and Abdel-Salam K: HPLC method for determination of paracetamol, sedoephedrine, triprolidine, methylparaben, propylparaben, sodium benzoate, and their related substances in pharmaceutical syrup. Journal of Liquid Chromatography and Related Technologies 2013; 36(9): 1251-7263.
- Patel J: RP-HPLC method development and validation for the estimation of diclofenac sodium, tramadol hydrochloride and chlorzoxazone from their combined tablet dosage form. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2014; 6(7): 632-37.
- Kumar PKB and Murugan V: Simultaneous determination of paracetamol, aceclofenac and chlorzoxazone in pharmaceutical dosage form by UHPLC. J Chromatography Sep Tech 2017; 8(5): 384,
- Salih ME, Aqel A and Abdulkhair BY: Simultaneous determination of paracetamol and chlorzoxazone in their combined pharmaceutical formulations by reversed-phase capilla liquid chromatography using a polymethacrylate monolithic column. Journal of Chromatographic Science 2018; 56(9): 819-27.
- Gandhi SV: Chemometric-assisted UV-spectrophotometric method for simultaneous estimation of paracetamol, chlorzoxazone and ibuprofen in multicomponent formulation. Ash Ese Journal of Pharmacy 2016; 1(1): 001-08.
- Abbar J and Sharanappa: Development of an electrochemical method for the determination of chlorzoxazone drug and its analytical applications to pharmaceutical dosage form and human biological fluids. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2011; 51(1): 111-18.
- Jyothi Abbar and Sharanappa: Voltammetric behaviour of chlorzoxazone and its electro analytical determination in pharmaceutical dosage form and urine at gold electrode. Cri Reviews in Analytical Chemistry 2012; 42(3): 272-81.
- The Indian Pharmacopoeia, Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Controller of Publication, 2007; 3: 1514. Rathinavel G, Priyadarsini R, Thakur D, Premanand DC, Valarmathy J, Hemalatha SL, Samueljoshua and Senthilkumar KL: Validated RP-HPLC method for estimation of aceclofenac, paracetamol and chlorzoxazone in dosage form. Der Pharma Chemica 2010; 2(2): 286-96.
- Ravisankar P, Devadasu C, Rao GD and Rao MN: Development and validation of rp-hplc method for simultaneous determination of paracetamol, aceclofenac sodium and chlorzoxazone in combined dosage. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2013; 3(1): 667-81.
- Joshi R and Sharma R: Development and validation of rp-hplc method for simultaneous estimation of three-component tablet formulation containing acetaminophen, chlorzoxazone and aceclofenac. Analytical Letters 2008; 41(18).
- Patel SA and Prajapati KM: Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of chlorzoxazone and diclofenac sodium in combination. Pharmatutor.
- Shaikh KA and Devkhile AB: Simultaneous determination of aceclofenac, paracetamol, and chlorzoxazone by RP-HPLC in the pharmaceutical dosage form. Chromatogr Sci 2008; 46(7): 649-52.
- Varu NH and Patel PB: development and validation of RP-HPLC method for dissolution study of pantoprazole sodium and domperidone in capsule dosage form world journal of pharmacy and pharmaceutical sciences 2018; 7(5): 930-44.
- Rao JVLNS: RP-HPLC determination of pantoprazole sodium in tablets. Asian Journal of Chemistry 2009; 21(8): 6596-98.
- Ali F: RP-HPLC method development and validation for the estimation of Pantoprazole in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms. 2015.
- Battu PR and Reddy NKK: Development and validation of RP-HPLC for the pantoprazole sodium sesquihydrate in Pharmaceutical dosage forms and Human Plasma. International Journal of Chem Tech Research CODEN (USA): IJCRGG 2009; 1(2): 195-98.
- Babu GR, IL Rao and JV Rao: “A rapid RP-HPLC development and validation for quantitative estimation of ribaverine in tablets. IJPPS 2015; 7(2):
- Dalia, Zioan and Omnia: “Rapid and validated HPLC-UV method for the determination of gamifloxin in human urine”. IJPPS 2015; 7(7):
How to cite this article:
Sakinala P, Vahika H, Santhosh K and Attinti S: Development and validation of stability indicating assay for simul-taneous determination ofpentaprazole, diclofenac, chloroxazone in pharmaceutical dosage form by using RP-HPLC. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2020; 11(4): 1757-67. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(4).1757-67.
All © 2013 are reserved by the International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
30
1757-1767
819
921
English
IJPSR
P. Sakinala *, H. Vahika, K. Santhosh and S. Attinti
Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Nirmala College of Pharmacy, Mangalagiri, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Padmavathi.sakinala@gmail.com
03 June 2019
25 October 2019
30 November 2019
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(4).1757-67
01 April 2020