DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF UV SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC METHODS FOR ESTIMATION OF RILPIVIRINE IN BULK AND PHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATION
HTML Full TextReceived on 20 September, 2013; received in revised form, 23 October, 2013; accepted, 11 January, 2014; published 01 February, 2014
DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF UV SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC METHODS FOR ESTIMATION OF RILPIVIRINE IN BULK AND PHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATION
Masthanamma Sk* and Alekhya Gottumukkala
Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, University College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Acharya Nagarjuna University, Nagarjuna nagar, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
ABSTRACT: In the present research work, four simple, precise, accurate and economical methods of UV spectroscopy have been developed for the estimation of Rilpivirine in bulk and pharmaceutical formulation. Method A involves estimation of Rilpivirine using low cost solvent, 0.01N HCl by zero order spectroscopy at an absorption maximum of 280nm. Method B involves Area under Curve method which involved calculation of integrated value of absorbance with respect to wavelength between two wavelengths selected, 275nm and 285nm respectively. Method C involves first order derivative technique for the same at 264nm. Method D involves second order derivative technique for the same at 237nm. The developed methods were found to be linear in the concentration range of 0.5-7.5μg/mL with correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.9998. The mean percentage label claim of tablets of Rilpivirine estimated by proposed methods was within the acceptable range. The developed methods were validated by following the analytical performance parameters suggested by ICH. All the validation parameters were within the acceptable range. As economical solvent is used, these methods can be used for routine analysis of Rilpivirine in bulk and pharmaceutical formulation.
Keywords: |
Rilpivirine, Area Under Curve method, Derivative spectroscopy, Tablets, Validation
INTRODUCTION:Rilpivirine (TMC278; formerly known as R278474) is non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), it had been developed for treatment of ARV naïve HIV-I infected patients to have better safety/ tolerability pofile compared to other NNRTIs (such as nevirapine, efavirenz and etravirine) 1.Chemically Rilpivirine is 4-[[4-[[4-[(E)-2-cyanoethenyl]- 2,6-dimethylphenyl] amino]-2- pyrimidinyl] amino] benzonitrile 2.
The chemical structure was shown in Figure 1 3. It is a di-amino pyrimidine derivative. It acts by binding to reverse trancriptase which results in block in RNA and DNA- dependent DNA polymerase activities. One such activity is HIV-I replication 1, 4.
FIGURE 1: CHEMICAL STRUCTURE OF RILPIVIRINE
It is an E-isomer. As the structure of Rilpivirine is flexible around aromatic rings, the molecule can have multiple conformations and so it can bind to residues in reverse transcriptase enzyme which have a lower mutation rate.
It is white to almost white powder. It is practically insoluble in water and is soluble in N, N- dimethyl acetamide, N, N-DMF, slightly soluble in methanol, propylene glycol and 1-methoxy2-propanol 5. Rilpivirine was approved by European Medicines Agency, UK and Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), Australia6.
Literature survey revealed that two simple UV spectroscopic methods 7, 8, few RP-HPLC methods 9, HPTLC method 10, LC-MS method 11, stability indicating UPLC method 12 were reported and for quantitative estimation of Rilpivirine in bulk and formulation have been developed.
However these methods include arduous sample preparation, long retention times and expensive solvents. To our knowledge, AUC and derivative UV methods are not available.
The objective of present investigation deals with development of simple, accurate, precise and more economical UV spectroscopic method using AUC and derivative methods for estimation of Rilpivirine in bulk and formulation and their validation as per ICH guidelines 18.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION:
Instrumentation:
- A double beam UV spectrophotometer: Shimadzu (1800) with UV probe software (2.31) and 10mm matched quartz cells.
- pH meter : Elico
- Weighing balance: Shimadzu (220h)
Materials, reagents and chemicals: Rilpivirine (99.7%) working standard drug was obtained from MYLAN labs ltd India, commercial tablet formulation of Rilpivirine (Edurant 25mg) were bought from pharmacy, methanol and hydrochloric acid which are of analytical grade were purchased from Merck Fine Chemicals(Mumbai, India). Double distilled water was used to prepare 0.01N HCl. Whatman filter paper no. 41 was used.
METHOD DEVELOPMENT:
Selection of solvent: Solubility of drug was performed in solvents like methanol and HCl and UV spectra of drug in these solutions were recorded. Absorbance values of drug were higher at distinct λmax with HCl as solvent. Then drug solutions were prepared using different normality solutions of HCl. The drug showed good absorbance value at that distinct λmax even with 0.01N HCl solution. Hence, 0.01N HCl was selected as solvent for further investigation as it is more economical.
Preparation of standard stock solution: The standard stock solution of Rilpivirine was prepared by dissolving accurately weighed 10mg of working standard taken in 10mL volumetric flask in 7mL methanol and the volume was made up to the mark with methanol.
Preparation of solutions of analytical concentration range: The working standard solution of Rilpivirine was prepared by transferring 1mL stock solution into 10ml volumetric flask and made up the volume with 0.01N HCl (concentration 100µg/ml). Appropriate aliquots were pipetted out from the working standard solution in to a series of 10 ml volumetric flasks. The volume was made up to the mark with 0.01N HCl to obtain solutions of concentration range, ranging from 0.5-7.5μg/mL of Rilpivirine.
Construction of calibration curve:
Method A: Zero order spectroscopic method: The analytical wavelength was selected by preparing a solution of concentration 3.0μg/mL by dilution of standard stock solution with 0.01N HCl solution. The solution was scanned in the wavelength range of 200-400nm using 0.01N HCl as blank. The UV spectrum of Rilpivirine showed λmax at 280nm in 0.01N HCl as shown in Figure 2.
The calibration curve was prepared in the concentration range of 0.5-7.5μg/mL at 280nm by measuring the absorbance of each concentration using 0.01N HCl as blank and plotting the absorbance v/s respective drug concentration. The regression equation was calculated.
FIGURE 2: ZERO ORDER SPECTRA OF RILPIVIRINE AT 280nm
Method B: Area under Curve method 13: The AUC method is applicable where there is no sharp peak or when broad peak is obtained. It involves the calculation of integrated value of absorbance with respect to wavelength between two selected wavelengths λ1 and λ2. Area calculation processing item calculates area bound by the curve and the horizontal axis. The horizontal axis is selected by entering the wavelength range over which area had to be calculated13.
The wavelength range is selected based on repeated observations so as to get the linearity between AUC and concentration. The solutions having analytical concentration range of 0.5-7.5μg/mL were scanned in the spectrum mode from the wavelength range 200-400nm and the AUC spectra were measured between wavelengths, 275nm and 285nm as shown in Figure 3. The calibration curve was prepared by plotting concentration v/s AUC.
FIGURE 3: AUC SPECTRUM OF RILPIVIRINE
Method C: First Order Derivative Spectroscopic method 14, 15: It involves the conversion of normal spectrum into first derivative spectrum. These derivative spectra have narrow spectral band width. Because of this resolution is better and it reveals overlapping bands that were lost in original spectra. Thus it is advantageous for selection of accurate wavelength. In addition, concentration measurements of an analyte in the presence of interference or of two or more analytes in a mixture can sometimes be made more easily or more accurately using derivative methods 14, 15, 16.
For the selection of analytical wavelength, a solution of concentration 3.0μg/mL of Rilpivirine was prepared and scanned in the spectrum mode in the λ range 200-400nm. The absorption spectrum thus obtained was derivatized in first order. First order derivative spectrum showed a sharp peak at λmax at 264nm and λminima at 306nm. The absorbance difference at n=1(dA /dλ) was calculated by inbuilt software of the instrument. The amplitude of absorbance was measured for all the solutions of concentration range 0.5-7.5μg/mL at 264nm and was plotted against concentration to give calibration curve as shown in Figure 4 and regression equation was calculated. The concentration of the drug present in the solution was determined against the calibration curve in quantitation mode.
FIGURE 4: FIRST ORDER DERIVATIVE SPECTRA OF RILPIVIRINE AT 264nm
Method D: Second Order Derivative Spectroscopic method 17: The original spectra were derivatized in the second order to get second order derivative spectra.
The spectra showed λmax at 237nm. The d2A/dλ2 of corresponding crests were measured at 237nm and plotted against concentrations to give calibration curve as shown in Figure 5 which is linear in the concentration range of 0.5-7.5μg/mL and regression equation was calculated.
FIGURE 5: SECOND ORDER DERIVATIVE SPECTRA OF RILPIVIRINE at 237nm
Estimation of Rilpivirine in tablet formulation: For the estimation of Rilpivirine in the commercial formulations, 5 tablets each containing 25 mg of Rilpivirine were weighed and the average weight was calculated. The tablets were crushed and powdered in glass mortar. For the analysis of drug, quantity of powder equivalent to 10mg of Rilpivirine was transferred to 10 mL volumetric flask and dissolved in sufficient quantity of methanol and the volume made upto the mark with methanol to obtain a stock solution of 1000 µg/mL of Rilpivirine.
Then, the solution was filtered through Whatmann filter paper no. 41. Further dilutions of the stock solution were made in 0.01N HCl to get required concentration of 3.0 µg/mL. The concentration of Rilpivirine in formulation was determined by above developed methods. Results of tablet analysis are shown in Table 1. The assay procedure was repeated six times (n=6) for each method.
TABLE 1: ASSAY RESULTS OF RILPIVIRINE BY FOUR METHODS
Analysis methods | Label claim (mg/tablet) | Amount found (mg) (n=6) | % amount found | %RSD |
A | 25 mg | 2.94 | 98.16 | 0.094 |
B | 25 mg | 3.05 | 101.6 | 0.064 |
C | 25 mg | 3.02 | 100.7 | 0.038 |
D | 25 mg | 3.01 | 100.3 | 0.011 |
The assay values determined by four methods were given in the table and from the above values it was clear that of all the developed methods second derivative method i.e., method D was accurate as the assay value was 100.3 and can conclude that on derivatization accuracy is increased.
METHOD VALIDATION: The methods were validated according to ICH guidelines 18 to study linearity, precision and accuracy.
- Linearity: The linearity of the proposed UV spectroscopic methods were evaluated by analyzing different concentrations of standard solutions of Rilpivirine and by plotting absorbances of analyte against concentrations of the analyte. Beer’s law was obeyed for all four methods in the concentration range of 0.5-7.5μg/mL.
A good linear relationship (R2=0.999) was observed between the concentrations of Rilpivirine and the corresponding absorbance. The regression analysis was made for slope, intercept and correlation coefficient values. The slope, intercept and the correlation coefficient of the drug were shown in Table 2. All the values were within the acceptable range.
TABLE 2: LINEARITY STUDIES OF THE PROPOSED METHODS
S. No. | Parameter | Method A | Method B | Method C | Method D |
1 | Linearity (µg/mL) | 0.5 - 7.5 | 0.5 - 7.5 | 0.5 - 7.5 | 0.5 - 7.5 |
2 | Slope | 0.1295 | 1.3017 | 0.0717 | 0.0061 |
3 | Intercept | 0.0082 | 0.0039 | 0.0027 | 0.0002 |
4 | Correlation coefficient | 0.9992 | 0.9993 | 0.9994 | 0.9996 |
- Accuracy: Accuracy is expressed as degree of closeness of experimental value to the true value. To study the accuracy of the proposed method and to check the interferences from excipients used in the dosage forms, recovery experiments were carried out by standard addition method. This parameter is evaluated by percent recovery studies at concentration levels of 80,100 and 120% which includes addition of known amounts of Rilpivirine working standard to a pre-quantified sample solution. Each of the dilution was observed six times. The samples were reanalyzed by proposed methods. The amount of Rilpivirine was estimated by applying obtained values to regression equation.The percentage recovery of the drug was calculated. The results were shown in the Table 3. All the values were within the acceptable range and the %recovery values show that there is no interference of additives and excipients.
TABLE 3: ACCURACY STUDIES OF RILPIVIRINE BY PROPOSED METHODS
Concentration taken (μg/mL) | Spiked level (%) | Amount added (mg) | Amount found (mg) (n=6) | %Recovery | ||||||
A | B | C | D | A | B | C | D | |||
3 | 80 | 2.4 | 5.34 | 5.48 | 5.45 | 5.42 | 98.8 | 101.4 | 100.9 | 100.3 |
3 | 100 | 3 | 5.96 | 6.07 | 6.04 | 6.02 | 99.3 | 101.16 | 100.6 | 100.1 |
3 | 120 | 3.6 | 6.55 | 6.69 | 6.69 | 6.63 | 99.2 | 101.3 | 100.5 | 100.4 |
- Precision: Precision is the level of repeatability of results as reported between samples analyzed on the same day (Intra- day) and samples run on three different days (Inter- day). To check the intra-day and inter-day variation of the methods, solutions containing 3.0, 4.5 and 6.0 μg/mL concentrations of Rilpivirine were subjected to the proposed spectrophotometric methods of analysis and the recoveries obtained were noted.
The precision of the proposed method i.e. the intra and inter –day variations in the absorbance of the drug solutions was calculated in terms of % RSD and the results were presented in the Table 4. Statistical evaluation revealed that relative standard deviation of drugs at different concentration levels for three times was less than 2.0. (Intra-day -0.48, inter-day- 0.473). The values were shown in Table 4.
TABLE 4: PRECISION STUDIES OF RILPIVIRINE
Concentration taken(μg/ml) | Intra-day precision | Inter-day precision | ||
*mean±SD | %RSD | *mean±SD | %RSD | |
3 | 0.429±0.004 | 0.93 | 0.412±0.005 | 1.3 |
4.5 | 0.585±0.003 | 0.60 | 0.579±0.004 | 0.86 |
6 | 0.782±0.005 | 0.57 | 0.776±0.005 | 0.70 |
*= mean of 3 readings
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
TABLE 5: SUMMARY OF OPTICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND VALIDATION PARAMETERS (TABLET)
Parameter | Method A | Method B | Method C | Method D |
λmax | 280nm | 275-285nm | 264nm | 237nm |
Beer’s limit(μg/mL) | 0.5 – 7.5 | 0.5 – 7.5 | 0.5 – 7.5 | 0.5 – 7.5 |
Sandell’s sensitivity(μg/mL) | 0.7x10-2 | 0.66x10-3 | 0.1x10-1 | 0.16 |
Linearity indicated by correlation coefficient | 0.9992 | 0.9993 | 0.9994 | 0.9996 |
Precision indicated by %RSD | 1.1 | 0.96 | 0.84 | 0.73 |
Accuracy indicated by %recovery | 99.1 | 101.28 | 100.6 | 100.2 |
The summary of validation parameters was shown in Table 5. All the values were within the acceptable range. All the proposed methods for estimation of Rilpivirine were found to be simple, precise, accurate and economical. For method A, the absorption maxima was found to be at 280 nm, for method B area under the curve in the range of 275-285 nm was selected for the analysis, for method C, the absorption maxima of first derivative spectra was found to be 264nm and finally for method D, the absorption maxima for second derivative spectra was found to be 237nm.
The calibration curve was linear in the concentration range 0.5-7.5μg/mL as shown in Table 2. The % assay by the four methods was found to be in the range 98.75-100.15% for Rilpivirine as shown in Table 1. No interference was observed from the pharmaceutical excipients. The recovery studies showed that these methods were accurate and reproducible. The results revealed that any change in drug concentration could be accurately determined by the proposed method. Accuracy and reproducibility of the proposed methods were further confirmed by percent recovery values, which were close to 100 with low values of standard deviation as shown in Table 3. Repeatability results indicated the precision under the same operating conditions over a short interval time and inter-assay precision. Intermediate precision study expresses within laboratory variation in different days.
In both intra and inter-day precision study for the method %RSD is not more than 2.0 indicate good intermediate precision which were shown in Table 4. Hence, the proposed methods were validated in terms of linearity, precision and accuracy. Characteristic parameters and summary of validation parameters for all the four methods were given in Table 5. By observing the validation parameters, the methods were found to be simple, accurate and precise. Hence these methods can be employed for the routine analysis of Rilpivirine in tablet formulations.
CONCLUSION: The four spectrophotometric methods were developed and validated as per ICH guidelines. The standard deviation and % RSD calculated for the proposed methods are within acceptance limits, indicating high degree of precision of the methods. The results of the recovery studies performed indicate the methods to be accurate and of these methods, second order derivative method is more accurate. Hence, it can be concluded that the developed spectrophotometric methods are simple, accurate, precise and economical and can be employed successfully for the estimation of Rilpivirine in bulk and formulation. There is a good scope for estimation of Rilpivirine by these methods to carry out their spectrophotometric analysis excluding the use of costlier and unsafe organic solvents by using low cost and easily available HCl as solvent.
Thus, it can be conveniently adopted for routine quality control analysis.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The authors gratefully acknowledge MYLAN Labs Ltd. for the gift samples of Rilpivirine provided by them. We also express our gratitude towards Dr. A.Prameela Rani, principal, University college of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guntur for providing laboratory facilities, carryout our research work.
REFERENCES:
- Drug description and product indications about rilpivirine. Available from http://www.rxlist.com/edurant-drug htm
- Drug monograph from drug bank available at http://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB08864
- Azijn H, Tirry I, Vingerhoets J, de Béthune MP, Kraus G, Boven K, Jochmans D, Van Craenenbroeck E, Picchio G, Rimsky LT. TMC278, a Next-Generation Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor (NNRTI), Active Against Wild-Type and NNRTI-Risistant HIV-1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(2):718-27.
- Drug monograph-Rilpivirine. Available from http://www.drugs.com/cdi/rilpivirine html.
- Clinical data and chemical data of rilpivirine. Available from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/rilpivirine
- Australian Public Assessment Report for Rilpivirine, Proprietary Product Name: Edurant; Sponsor: Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd., Therapeutic Goods Administration, Australia, March 2012. Available from: http://www.tga.gov.au/pdf/auspar/auspar-rilpivirine-120327.pdf
- Ghosh Somsubhra, Kumar Mithiles, Jena Satyabrata, Dr. Banji David, Roy Subhadip: Method Development and Validation of Rilpivirine in bulk and Pharmaceutical Tablet Dosage Form by using UV – Visible Spectrophometric Method. Asian Journal of Research In Chemistry 2012; 5(Iss.12):1472-1475.
- Girija B. Bhavar, Sanjay S. Pekamwar, Kiran B. Aher, Sanjay R. Chaudhari: Development and validation of UV spectrophotometric method for estimation of Rilpivirine Hydrochloride in bulk and pharmaceutical formulations. American Journal of Pharmtech Research 2013; 3(1): 450-458.
- Venkata reddiah CH, Rama devi P, Mukkanti: Effective estimation of rilpivirine by hplc method in tablet dosage forms and its in-vitro dissolution assessment. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2012; 4(3):595-599.
- Sudha T, Shanmugasundram P: Reverse phase High Performance and HPTLC methods for the determination of rilpivirine bulk and in tablet dosage form. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 2012; 1(4):1183-1196.
- Shibata M, Takahashi M, Kuwahara T, Nomura T, Yokomaku Y, Sugiura W: Determination of rilpivirine (TMC-278) plasma concentrations by the conventional LC-MS method. Journal of the International AIDS Society 2012; 15(suppl 4):18361. Available from http://www.jiasociety.org/index.php/jias/article/view/18361
- Mohanareddy Chilukuri, Hussain Reddy K P, Narayanareddy P,Venkataramana A: Degradation Pathway for Rilpivirine Hydrochloride by Validated Stability Indicating UP-LC Method. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology 2012; 1:1-13.
- Sasmita Kumari Acharjya, Alok Sahu, Srikanta Das, Padhy Sagar and Mathrusri Annapurna M: Spectrophotometric methods for the determination of mesalamine in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms. Journal of Pharm Education and Research 2010; 1(1):63-67.
- Patel Satish Ambalal, Patel Natvarlal J: Validated spectrophotometric methods for determination of Deflazacort in tablet dosage forms. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Life Sciences 2011; 1(3):216-223.
- Dave HN, Mashru RC, Thakkar AR: Simultaneous determination of salbutamol sulphate, bromhexine hydrochloride and etofylline in pharmaceutical formulations with the use of four rapid derivative spectrophotometric methods. Analytica Chimica Acta 2007; 597:113–120.
- Mukherji G, Aggarwal N: Derivative UV-spectroscopic determination of salbutamol sulphate in the presence of gelatin. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 1991; 71:187-191.
- Beata Stanisz, Sylwia Paszun, Marcin Leaniak: Validation of UV derivative spectrophotometric method for determination of Benazepril Hydrochloride in tablets and evaluation of its stability. Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica – Drug Research 2009; 66 (4): 343-349.
- International Conference on Harmonization, Validation of analytical procedures: Text and methodology. ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guidelines Q2 (R1), November 2005.
How to cite this article:
Sk M and Gottumukkala A: Development and validation of UV Spectrophotometric methods for estimation of Rilpivirine in bulk and pharmaceutical formulation. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2014; 5(2): 483-89.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR. 0975-8232.5(2).483-89
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
25
483-489
454KB
1958
English
IJPSR
Masthanamma Sk* and Alekhya Gottumukkala
Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, University College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Acharya Nagarjuna University, Nagarjuna nagar, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
masthanamma.sk@gmail.com
20 September, 2013
23 October, 2013
11 January, 2014
http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.5(2).483-89
01 February, 2014