DEVELOPMENT OF MALTODEXTRIN BASED PRONIOSOMES DERIVED NIOSOMES OF OFLOXACIN
HTML Full TextDEVELOPMENT OF MALTODEXTRIN BASED PRONIOSOMES DERIVED NIOSOMES OF OFLOXACIN
G. S. Ravi *, Akhilesh Dubey and Srinivas Hebbar
Department of Pharmaceutics, N. G. S. M. Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, NITTE (Deemed to be University), Paneer, Deralakatte, Mangaluru - 575018, Karnataka, India.
ABSTRACT: Nanotechnology is an advancing technology expected to bring revolutionary changes in the field of life sciences including drug delivery. The advance in nanotechnology helps in the preparation of new pharmaceutical formulations with high benefits. One of its approaches is to stabilize the niosomal drug delivery system without affecting its properties have resulted in the development of proniosomes, a drug carrier. Proniosomes are solid colloidal particles which may be hydrated immediately before use to yield aqueous noisome dispersions similar to those produced by conventional methods. These proniosomes minimize the problems related to conventional niosomes such as aggregation, fusion, leaking and provide additional convenience in transportation, distribution, storage and dosing with enhanced stability. Ofloxacin loaded maltodextrin based proniosomes were prepared by a slurry method with a different surfactant to cholesterol ratio. The formulated proniosomes possessed good flow property and smooth surface confirmed by SEM study. FTIR spectra’s confirmed no interactions between drug and carrier. The niosomal dispersions were formulated and further evaluated for particle size, polydispersity index (PDI), zeta potential, TEM, entrapment efficiency, in-vitro drug release, and kinetic studies. F4 formulation showed highest entrapment efficiency of 87.16% and sustained release of drug with diffusion mechanism.
Keywords: |
Ofloxacin, Proniosomes, Niosomes, Maltodextrin, Sustained release
INTRODUCTION: A new era of science and technology has emerged during the past decade in pharmaceutical research which is aimed at the development of advanced or novel drug delivery systems. These advanced drug delivery systems have several advantages over conventional drug delivery systems.
Various novel approaches have been used for the delivery of drugs include vesicular drug delivery systems, nanoparticles, microemulsions, magnetic microcapsules, implantable pumps, etc. They are having added benefits over conventional dosage forms such as increased bioavailability, site-specific drug delivery, sustained release of drug for a longer period, retention of the dosage form in the entire length of GI tract and convenient to the patient due to reduced dosing frequency 1.
In recent past, niosomes have been extensively studied for their potential to serve as a carrier for delivery of drugs, antigen, hormone and other bioactive agents. These are non-ionic surfactants based multi or unilamellar vesicles and are structurally similar to liposomes. They are biodegradable, biocompatible and flexible 2. Niosomes possess several advantages over liposomes such as chemical stability, purity, and low cost. But like liposomes, aqueous suspensions of niosomes may exhibit aggregation, fusion, leaking of entrapped drugs or hydrolysis of encapsulated drugs, thus limiting the shelf life of the dispersion. Proniosome would avoid many of the problems associated with aqueous noisomal dispersions and problems of physical stability 3.
Proniosomes are dry, free-flowing formulations of water-soluble carrier particles that are coated with a surfactant and can be measured out as needed and dehydrated to form niosomal dispersion immediately before the use with brief agitation in hot aqueous media. The resulting niosomes will be very similar to conventional niosomes and more uniform in size. Proniosomes are microscopic lamellar structures formed by combining a non-ionic surfactant of the alkyl or dialkyl polyglycerol ether class and cholesterol followed by hydration in aqueous media. The surfactant molecule directs themselves such that the hydrophilic ends of the non-ionic surfactant orient outward, while the hydrophobic ends are in the opposite direction to form the bilayer 4. Proniosomal formulations based on maltodextrin were recently developed to deliver hydrophobic or amphiphilic drugs. The principal advantage of this formulation is the amount of carrier required to support the surfactant can be easily adjusted. It is a widely used approach because of the ease of production of proniosomes and hydration of surfactant from proniosomes 5, 6.
The present study is aimed at overall improvement of therapeutic efficacy of antibacterial drug Ofloxacin through proniosome encapsulation. Ofloxacin is a fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent. It is a broad spectrum antibiotic active against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria 7. It inhibits the supercoiling activity of DNA gyrase and halts DNA replication 8. It is used in various urinary and respiratory tract infections 9, 10, gonorrhea 11, soft tissue and skin infections 12. The poor aqueous solubility of Ofloxacin gives rise to difficulties in the design of pharmaceutical formulation which leads to variations in dissolution, absorption and bioavailability 13.
This problem can be overcome by entrapping the drug in a vesicular structure 14. Encapsulation of a drug in a vesicular structure like niosomes may prolong the existence of the drug in the systemic circulation, enhance penetration into the target tissue and reduce toxicity if selective uptake occurs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Materials: Ofloxacin was procured from Yarrow Chem, Mumbai, India. Maltodextrin was purchased from S. D. Fine Chem Ltd., Mumbai, India. Cholesterol, span-60, chloroform and ethanol were procured from Loba Chemie Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India, and all other chemicals/reagents were used of analytical grade.
Methods:
Formulation of Proniosomes: Proniosomes were prepared by the slurry method. Formulation ratios of Ofloxacin proniosomes are given in Table 1.
TABLE 1: FORMULATION RATIOS OF OFLOXACIN PRONIOSOMES
Formulation Code | Surfactant: Cholesterol ratio (μmol) | Surfactant
(mg) |
Cholesterol (mg) |
F1 | 210:40 | 90.43 | 15.46 |
F2 | 190:60 | 81.81 | 23.20 |
F3 | 170:80 | 73.20 | 30.93 |
F4 | 150:100 | 64.59 | 38.67 |
F5 | 130:120 | 55.98 | 46.40 |
F6 | 110:140 | 47.36 | 54.13 |
F7 | 90:160 | 38.75 | 61.87 |
Initially a 250 μmol stock solution of span-60 and cholesterol in chloroform: ethanol (2:1) solvent mixture was prepared and kept. The drug was then dissolved in the required volume of stock solution and taken into a 100 ml round bottom flask containing the maltodextrin carrier.
The additional solvent mixture was then added to form a slurry in the case of lower surfactant loading. The round bottom flask was then attached to a rotary flash evaporator (Superfit Rotavap-PBU-6D, Superfit continental Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India.) to evaporate solvent at 60 to 70 rpm, 45 ± 2 ºC temperature and 600 mmHg pressure until the formation of a dry, free-flowing product 15. The product formed is further dried in a vacuum desiccator at room temperature. These proniosomes were stored in a tightly closed container at refrigerator temperature until further use.
Preparation of Niosomes from Proniosomes: Proniosomes were transformed to niosomes by hydrating with hot water at 80 ºC and by gentle mixing. The niosomes were sonicated twice for 30 sec using sonicator and then subjected for further studies 16.
Evaluation of Proniosomes:
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) Spectroscopy: Infrared spectroscopy was performed to confirm the interactions between drug and excipients. FTIR spectra were obtained using an FTIR spectrometer (Alpha Bruker, Japan) by ATR technique. After cleaning of crystal area, the solid material was placed, the pressure arm was positioned, and the spectrum was recorded 17. Samples assessed encompassed pure Ofloxacin and physical mixture of Ofloxacin with maltodextrin carrier.
Angle of Repose: Flow property of proniosomes was studied by determining the angle of repose of the formulations by employing fixed funnel method. Ofloxacin proniosomes were weighed and passed through the funnel, which was fixed at a position so that the 13 mm outlet orifice of the funnel was 2 cm above a level black surface. The passed proniosomes formed a pile. The height ‘h’ and the radius ‘r’ of the pile were measured, and the angle of repose (θ) was determined by using the formula ‘tan θ = h / r 18.
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM): Proniosomes were sprinkled on to the double-sided tape affixed on the aluminum stub. The aluminum stub was placed in the vacuum chamber of the scanning electron microscope (JEOL-JSM 6380LA, Tokyo, Japan). The samples were observed for morphological characterization using a gaseous secondary electron detector 19.
Evaluation of Niosomes
Particle Size, Poly Dispersity Index (PDI) and Zeta Potential: The mean particle size, size distribution as PDI and zeta potential of niosome formulations were determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) method using Malvern Zeta Sizer (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK) 20. The samples were diluted with distilled water in 1:10 ratio before the measurement. Measurements were performed in triplicates.
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM): Transmission electron microscopy was used to determine the morphological characteristics of the selected niosomal formulation by using Transmission Electron Microscope (JEM-100S microscope; JOEL Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). One drop of the diluted solution of the formulation was placed on a carbon-coated copper grid, forms a fine liquid film and the film on the grid was negatively stained. The stained film was dried in air and observed under a transverse electron microscope, and photographs were taken 21.
Entrapment Efficiency: The amount of Ofloxacin entrapped in niosomes was estimated by the dialysis method. The prepared niosomes were placed in the dialysis bag (pre-soaked for 24 h). Free Ofloxacin was dialyzed for 30 min each time in 100 ml of phosphate buffer saline pH 7.4. The dialysis of free Ofloxacin always completed after 12-15 changes, when no drug was detectable in the recipient solution. The dialyzed Ofloxacin was determined by finding out the concentration of bulk of solution by UV spectrophotometer (V-630, Jasco-UV International Company Ltd., Japan.) at 295 nm. The samples from the bulk of solution diluted ten times before going for absorbance measurement. The free Ofloxacin in the bulk of solution gives us the total amount of un-entrapped drug. Encapsulation efficiency was calculated using the following formula 22,
% Entrapment efficiency = Total drug-Diffused drug / Total drug × 100
In-vitro Drug Release and Kinetic Studies: In-vitro release studies were carried out using dialysis membrane employing in two sides open-ended cylinder. 1 ml of proniosomal suspension was placed uniformly in the dialysis membrane previously soaked overnight. The two sides open-ended cylinder was placed in the beaker containing 200 ml of phosphate buffer saline pH 7.4. Aliquots of 5 ml were withdrawn periodically and replaced with the same amount of phosphate buffer saline solution to maintain the sink condition. The samples were analyzed using UV spectrophotometer (Jasco-UV International Company Ltd, Japan.) at 295 nm. To describe the kinetics of the release process of the drug in the different formulations, zero order, first order, Higuchi and Korsmeyer and Peppas models were fitted to the dissolution data of selected formulation using linear regression analysis 23.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Evaluation of Proniosomes:
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) Spectroscopy: FTIR spectra of Ofloxacin and physical mixture of Ofloxacin with maltodextrin carrier is given in Fig. 1. The characteristic peaks of Ofloxacin show IR absorption at 1459, 1621, 1715, 1086 cm-1. All these peaks also have appeared in a physical mixture of the drug with maltodextrin carrier, which indicates no chemical interaction between Ofloxacin and the carrier, confirms the stability of the drug during the formulation.
FIG. 1: FTIR SPECTRA OF OFLOXACIN AND PHYSICAL MIXTURE OF OFLOXACIN WITH MALTODEXTRIN CARRIER
Angle of Repose: Angle of repose of proniosome formulations by fixed funnel method. The angle of repose for all the formulations was found to be in the range of 28.56º ± 0.34º to 30.12º ± 0.14º indicates the good flow property according to IP limits.
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM): Scanning electron microscopy was carried out to determine the surface morphology of the proniosomes. The SEM image Fig. 2 revealed the porous and smooth surface of formed pronoisomes.
FIG. 2: SEM IMAGE OF PRONIOSOMAL FORMULATION AT X1500 MAGNIFICATION
Evaluation of Niosomes:
Particle Size, Poly Dispersity Index (PDI) and Zeta Potential: The formulated Ofloxacin niosomes characterized for particle size, zeta potential and polydispersity index Table 2. Formulation F4 showed a minimum particle size of 409nm and PDI 0.457. The low PDI value indicates a narrow range of particle size distribution. As expected all the formulations showed negative zeta potential which is due to the outer surfactant layers. F4 formulation showed an adequate zeta potential -28.9 mV indicates the good stability of Ofloxacin niosomes from flocculation when seen in the context of its lower particle size.
TABLE 2: PARTICLE SIZE, PDI, ZETA POTENTIAL AND ENTRAPMENT EFFICIENCY OF OFLOXACIN NIOSOMES
Formulation code | Particle size (nm) | PDI | Zeta potential (mV) | Entrapment efficiency (%) |
F1 | 516.7 ± 3.48 | 0.578 ± 0.04 | -39.6 ± 0.42 | 64.37 ± 3.41 |
F2 | 486.5 ± 4.21 | 0.624 ± 0.02 | -22.4 ± 0.36 | 72.67 ± 2.36 |
F3 | 471.4 ± 3.76 | 0.586 ± 0.03 | -36.7 ± 0.46 | 77.81 ± 3.28 |
F4 | 409.2 ± 2.28 | 0.457 ± 0.02 | -28.9 ± 0.27 | 87.16 ± 1.21 |
F5 | 502.6 ± 4.92 | 0.729 ± 0.03 | -33.8 ± 0.21 | 76.81 ± 1.96 |
F6 | 465.8 ± 3.57 | 0.905 ± 0.02 | -34.6 ± 0.34 | 62.61 ± 2.72 |
F7 | 502.78 ± 4.62 | 0.724 ± 0.06 | -35.3 ± 0.38 | 56.85 ± 2.98 |
Values are mean ± SEM (n=3).
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM): The TEM image Fig. 3 of the selected niosomal formulation (F4) showed well formed, discrete vesicles without any evidence of aggregation or decomposition.
Entrapment Efficiency: Higher entrapment efficiency of the vesicles of a formulation containing surfactant span 60 is expected due to its higher alkyl chain length. F4 formulation showed highest entrapment efficiency of 87.16% which may have an optimum surfactant cholesterol ratio to provide a high entrapment of Ofloxacin. The niosomal formulations having high surfactant concentration (F3, F4, and F5) showed the higher entrapment efficiency which might be due to the high fluidity of the vesicles. The formulation with very low cholesterol content (F1) was also found to cause low entrapment efficiency (64.37%), which might be because of leakage of the vesicles. It was also observed that formulation with very high cholesterol content (F7) had a low effect on drug entrapment. This could be because cholesterol beyond a certain level starts disrupting the regular bi-layered structure leading to the loss of drug entrapment. Entrapment efficiency obtained for all the formulations is given in Table 2.
FIG. 3: TEM IMAGE OF NIOSOMAL FORMULATION
In-vitro Drug Release and Kinetic Studies: Most of the formulations were found to have a linear release and the formulations were found to provide approximately 60% - 90% release within a period of 12 h. Cholesterol, which has a property to abolish the gel to liquid transition of niosomes, this found to prevent the leakage of drug from the niosomal formulation. The slower release of drug from multilamellar vesicles may be attributed to the fact that multilamellar vesicles consist of several concentric spheres of bilayer separated by aqueous compartment. Formulations F6 and F7 showed sustained release of the drug. The formulations F3, F4, and F5 were found to give a cumulative release of 75.82%, 86.35%, and 76.92% respectively throughout 12 h.
Formulation F6 and F7 having the highest cholesterol content showed the slow release of 60.96 % and 54.62% respectively throughout 12 h. The results of in-vitro drug release studies of all the formulations depicted in Fig. 4. The zero order plots showed the zero order release characteristics of the formulation, which was confirmed by the correlation value which was found to be nearer to one. The correlation value of Higuchi’s plot revealed that the mechanism of drug release is diffusion. The in-vitro kinetic data subjected to log time log drug release trans-formation plot (Peppa’s model) revealed the fact that the drug release follows a super case II transport diffusion.
FIG. 4: % CUMULATIVE DRUG RELEASE FROM ALL NIOSOMAL FORMULATIONS
CONCLUSION: Proniosomes are promising drug carriers offers significant improvement in drug delivery by eliminating physical stability problems, such as aggregation or fusion of vesicles and leaking of entrapped drugs during long-term storage. Proniosomes shows similar release profile of conventional niosomes and offers better bioavailability of drug with poor solubility and site-specific, sustained delivery. The slurry method was found to be simple and suitable for laboratory scale. Hence, the slurry method was used to formulate proniosomes using maltodextrin as the carrier. By this study, we concluded that Ofloxacin could be successfully entrapped within the bilayer of the vesicles with high entrapment efficiency.
Proniosomes based niosomes formed from span 60 and cholesterol using maltodextrin as a carrier is a promising approach to sustain the drug release for an extended period.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The authors are thankful to N. G. S. M. institute of pharmaceutical sciences, Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangaluru for providing the necessary facilities to carry out this work. The authors dedicated this research work to our beloved Professor Late Dr. Prabhakara Prabhu (deceased on 26/11/2018) for his immense contribution to the research especially in the area of advanced drug delivery system.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors confirm that this article content has no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES:
- Din FU, Aman W, Ullah I, Qureshi OS, Mustapha O, Shafique S and Zeb A: Effective use of nanocarriers as drug delivery systems for the treatment of selected tumors. International Journal of Nanomedicine 2017; 12: 7291-7309.
- Dehaghi MH, Haeri A, Keshvari H, Abbasian Z and Dadashzadeh A: Dorzolamide loaded niosomal vesicles: comparison of passive and remote loading methods. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 2017; 16(2): 413-422.
- Khatoon M, Shah KU, Din FU, Shah SU, Rehman AU, Dilawar N and Khan AN: Proniosomes derived niosomes: recent advancements in drug delivery and targeting. Drug Delivery 2017; 24: 56-69.
- Yasam VR, Jakki SL, Natarajan J and Kuppusamy G: A review on novel vesicular drug delivery: proniosomes. Drug Delivery 2014; 21(4): 243-249.
- Lather V, Sharma D and Pandita D: Proniosomal gel-mediated transdermal delivery of bromocriptine: an in-vitro and ex-vivo Journal of Experimental Nanoscience 2016; 11(13): 1044-1057.
- Sambhakar S, Paliwal S, Sharma S and Singh B: Formulation of risperidone loaded proniosomes for effective transdermal delivery: An in-vitro and in-vivo Bulletin of Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University 2017; 55(2): 239-247.
- Rawal G, Yadav S, Kumar R and Wani UR: Ofloxacin induced angioedema: A rare adverse drug reaction. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2016; 10(11): FD03-FD04.
- Kamdi AS, Kokane SD, Bohra PN and Kalambe SM: Systematic review of adverse drug reactions of ofloxacin. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology 2018; 7(11): 2277-2280.
- Lee MTG, Lee SH, Chang SS, Lee SH, Lee M, Fang CC, Chen SC and Lee CC: Comparative effectiveness of different oral antibiotics regimens for treatment of urinary tract infection in outpatients: An analysis of national representative claims database. Medicine 2014; 93: 1-10.
- Naik H and Kolur A: Upper respiratory tract infection: drug utilization study. International Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology 2016; 5(5): 1822-1825.
- Unemo M: Current and future antimicrobial treatment of gonorrhea- the rapidly evolving Neisseria gonorrhoeae continues to challenge. BMC Infectious Diseases 2015; 15: 364.
- Nathwani D, Dryden M and Garau J: Early clinical assessment of response to treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections: how can it help clinicians? Perspectives from Europe. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 2016; 48(2): 127-136.
- Saritha N and Jaya S: Preparation and evaluation of solid dispersions of Ofloxacin. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 2017; 6(16): 1116-1154.
- Kalepu S and Nekkanti V: Insoluble drug delivery strategies: a review of recent advances and business prospects. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 2015; 5(5): 442-453.
- Hazel G, Dubey A, Prabhu P and Kamath JV: Development and evaluation of norfloxacin loaded maltodextrin based proniosomes. International Research Journal of Pharmacy 2012; 3(6): 176-179.
- Maryam K, Kifayat US, Fakhar UD, Shefaat US, Asim UR, Naz D and Ahmad NK: Proniosomes derived niosomes: recent advancements in drug delivery and targeting. Drug Delivery 2017; 2: 56-69.
- Ravi GS, Charyulu NR, Dubey A, Hebbar S and Mathias AC: Phytosomes: A novel molecular nano complex between phytomolecule and phospholipid as a value added herbal drug delivery system. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research 2018; 51(1): 84-90.
- Shehata TM, Abdallah MH and Ibrahim MM: Proniosomal oral tablets for controlled delivery and enhanced pharmacokinetic properties of acemetacin. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 2015; 16(2): 375-383.
- Dubey A, Shetty A, Ravi GS, Kiritkumar MC, Prabhu P, Hebbar S and El‑Zahaby SA: Development and investigation of novel solid self‑nanoemulsifying system loaded with hydrochlorothiazide for the treatment of hypertension. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation 2018; 8(2): 83-91.
- Asthana GS, Sharma PK and Asthana A: In-vitro and in- vivo evaluation of niosomal formulation for controlled delivery of clarithromycin. Scientifica 2016; 6492953.
- Ravi GS, Charyulu NR, Dubey A, Prabhu P, Hebbar S and Mathias AC: Nano-lipid complex of rutin: Development, characterisation and in-vivo investigation of hepato-protective, antioxidant activity and bioavailability study in rats. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 2018; 19(8): 3631-3649.
- Vishnu TS, Dubey A, Ravi GS and Hebbar S: Design of proniosomal gel containing eugenol as an antifungal agent for the treatment of oral candidiasis. Indian Drugs 2018; 55(9): 55-57.
- Jacob S, Nair AB and Al-Dhubiab BE: Preparation and evaluation of niosome gel containing acyclovir for enhanced dermal deposition. Journal of Liposome Research 2017; 27(4): 283-292.
How to cite this article:
Ravi GS, Dubey A and Hebbar S: Development of maltodextrin based proniosomes derived niosomes of Ofloxacin. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2019; 10(3): 1485-90. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.10(3).1485-90.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
66
1485-1490
693
959
English
IJPSR
G. S. Ravi *, A. Dubey and S. Hebbar
Department of Pharmaceutics, N. G. S. M. Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, NITTE (Deemed to be University), Paneer, Deralakatte, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.
ravi@nitte.edu.in
11 July 2018
14 January 2019
19 January 2019
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.10(3).1485-90
01 March 2019