DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NATIVE AND MUTANT RHIZOBIUM ON GROWTH OF VIGNA MUNGO L.
HTML Full TextDIFFERENCE BETWEEN NATIVE AND MUTANT RHIZOBIUM ON GROWTH OF VIGNA MUNGO L.
Shijila Rani AS 1, P. Parthiban *1 and V. Mahesh 2
Department of Microbiology 1, Marudupandiyar College, Vallam, Thanjavur, Tamilnadu, India.
MR Govt. Arts and Science College 2, Mannargudi, Tamilnadu, India.
ABSTRACT: The present study, carry out the use of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, were used to improve the yield in crop. The Rhizobium strains isolated from legumes plant Mimosa pudica L and this strain was mutated by using UV radiation. The plant growth hormones were detected by native as well as mutant Rhizobium strains by paper chromatography techniques. The same strains use in conducted to green house; the compared to two strains of Rhizobium, mutated strain are high growth and yield when compared to normal stain.
Keywords: |
Mimosa pudica L, Rhizobium strain, mutated agents, Vigna mungo L
INTRODUCTION: Rhizobia encompass a range of bacterial genera, including Rhizobium, Bradyrhizobium, Sinorhizobium, Mesorhizobium, Allorhizobium and Azorhizobium, which are able to establish a symbiosis with leguminous plants. They elicit the formation of specialized organs, called nodules, to reduce atmospheric nitrogen and make it available to the plant 1.
In legume-Rhizobium symbioses, variabilities in symbiotic effectiveness which are either due to variations in nitrogen fixing potential of Rhizobium strains 2, 3, 4 or due to host genotypic compatibility of DNA based detection technology that plastids and mitochondria of the eukaryotic cell were derived from a consortium of primitive microbes 5, 6, 7 are often observed.
The common capacity of such symbiosis to reduce dinitrogen to ammonia and to incorporate this product into the nitrogen metabolic stream of the host plant gives the genus a place of outstanding importance in natural ecosystems and agricultural production.
In genetics, a mutagen is a physical or chemical agent that changes the genetic material, usually DNA, of an organism and thus increases the frequency of mutations above the natural background level. As many mutations can cause cancer, mutagens are therefore also likely to be carcinogens. For example of chemical mutagens are ethidium bromide, Acridine dye, etc and physical mutagens are X-rays, alpha rays, gamma rays, beta rays, cosmic rays, they distort or break DNA duplex and disturb the replication. Ultraviolet rays are non-ionizing radiations and produce thymine dimers. In this paper, they are report the symbiotic behaviour of these mutants in relation to the parent strain.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Sample collection: Root nodules were collected from young and healthy seedling plants of Mimosa pudica L, plant from Oruthanadu, Thanjavur (dist), Tamil nadu, India.
Isolation of Rhizobium sp from root nodules: To select, healthy and reddish-pink root nodules were tenderly washed with distilled water and surface sterilized by keeping in 0.1 percent HgCl2 for 4-5 min and wash with sterile distilled water following by 95 percent ethyl alcohol, repeat washing with sterile distilled water 8. The nodules were crushed in a small drop of sterile distilled water to obtain milky suspension. Then, serial dilutions were made and aliquots dilutions were spread on yeast extract mannitol agar (YEMA) medium plates were incubated at 28±1°C for 3-5 days 9.
Identification and biochemical test of Rhizobium sp: The isolated colonies are conformed by microscopic observation, biochemical test, 10 and cultural test were performed. Isolates were identified as per Bergey’s manual of Systematic bacteriology.
Identification of IAA: Biosynthesized auxins were partially characterized by paper chromatography method 11. In which three, grams of culture filtrate were extracted with 50 ml of peroxide-free ether for 2 hours at 5ºC. Extracts of the samples were simultaneously loaded and developed using isopropanol: ammonia:water (10:1:1 v/v/v) as a running solvent. The appearance of the strips under ultraviolet light and spraying with modified Salkowski reagent is indicated.
Effect of native and mutant Rhizobium on growth of Vigna mungo L: The pot trails were accomplished by Department of Microbiology Marudupandiyar College, Vallam, Thanjavur 12. Each one had conducted triplicates. The treatments follow as:
T1 Control (with out Rhizobium), T2 Rhizobium (R Mutant seed inoculation), T3 Rhizobium (R Native seed inoculation), T4 Rhizobium (R Mutant seed inoculation + foliar spray), T5 Rhizobium (R Native seed inoculation + foliar spray).
After germination, plants were treated with 48 hrs old culture, which were foliar sprayed to the Vigna mungo plants every week for 4 times, starting from 10th day of germination. The plants were harvested every 15th day of intervals, after harvesting to analyse agronomical characters such as morphometric and number of root nodules analyse in standard procedure.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION: The isolates of rhizobia from root nodules of legume plants were characterized by opaque and milky white in appearance in YEMA medium. The rhizobial strains were isolated from the nodules of Mung bean 13, Pisum sativum 14 and Cassia alata 15. The rhizobial strains were identified in microscopic and biochemical test. The result were compared with Bergey’s manual of Determinative Bacteriology 9th edition and conformed as Rhizobium. Similarly, Singh et al. 16 also characterized Rhizobium strains on the basis of biochemical tests. The native strain of Rhizobium was induced by UV mutagen treated with different time intervals, (1 to 6 min). Out of six minutes treatment, four minutes were observed in maximum number of colonies (3.0±2.12) compared to other treatments recorded in Table 1. So, further study we have chosen in four minutes mutated isolates.
TABLE 1: NATIVE RHIZOBIUM SPECIES ARE SPONTANEOUS MUTATION BY DIFFERENT TIME
S.no |
Native Rhizobium treated with UV in different time (min) |
No. of colonies |
1 |
Control (untreated) |
4.09±2.04 |
2 |
One |
1±0.7 |
3 |
Two |
0.5±0.35 |
4 |
Three |
2.5±1.7 |
5 |
Four |
3.0±2.12 |
6 |
Five |
1.5±1.06 |
7 |
Six |
1.5±1.06 |
These Rhizobial strains were use in separation of Auxin and Gibberellin compounds by paper chromatography method by Table 2. Some workers reported by different legume nodulating rhizobial strains preferred different vitamins sources for IAA production reported 17, 18.
TABLE 2: SEPARATION OF PLANT GROWTH HORMONE BY PAPER CHROMATOGRAPHY TECHNIQUES
S.no |
Plant growth hormone |
Native strain |
Mutant strain |
1 |
Auxin |
0.52 |
1.07 |
2 |
Gibberellins |
0.7 |
1.3 |
The pot trial was conducted to study the response of Vigna mungo to inoculation with Rhizobium and foliar application. The result revealed that the black gram responded well to the inoculation of rhizobium. The plants inoculated with mutant Rhizobium possessed significantly greater plant height, dry weight and nodules formation was monitor, the UV mutant Rhizobium species were high responsible for the plant growth (Table 3, 4 and 5). The current observations of the pot experiment of pea was close to Fischer et al. 19, who find out the ability of Rhizobium on wheat by development of shoot/ root fresh and dry weights. All the Rhizobium strains improved the root and shoot dry biomass by 100% and 70% respectively. The current conclusion goes to the results 20, 21, who obtained 70% increase in pea root/shoot dry biomass by PGPRs inoculation as contrast to control (uninoculated).
TABLE 3: 15TH DAY MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF V.MUNGO PLANT
S.no |
Parameters |
T1 |
T2 |
T3 |
T4 |
T5 |
T6 |
1 |
Shoot length (cm) |
20.5 |
21.3 |
16.5 |
21.2 |
14.8 |
22.4 |
2 |
Root length (cm) |
6.7 |
4.5 |
5.5 |
6.5 |
6.7 |
6.3 |
3 |
Plant height (cm) |
27.2 |
25.8 |
22.0 |
27.7 |
20.5 |
28.7 |
4 |
Leaf length (cm) |
4.7 |
4.7 |
4.4 |
5.5 |
4.4 |
5.6 |
5 |
Leaf width (cm) |
1.6 |
1.7 |
1.7 |
1.7 |
1.5 |
1.8 |
6 |
Leaf area (cm) |
3.7 |
3.8 |
3.7 |
4.3 |
3.3 |
5.0 |
7 |
No. of nodules (Nos) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
8 |
Plant fresh weight (mg) |
50 |
75 |
120 |
200 |
110 |
190 |
9 |
Plant dry weight (mg) |
0.2 |
0.5 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
T1 Control (with out Rhizobium), T2 Rhizobium (R Mutant seed inoculation), T3 Rhizobium (R Native seed inoculation), T4 Rhizobium (R Mutant seed inoculation + foliar spray), T5 Rhizobium (R Native seed inoculation + foliar spray) T6 Combined effect of Native and Rhizobium.
TABLE 4: 30TH DAY MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF V.MUNGO PLANT
S.no |
Parameters |
T1 |
T2 |
T3 |
T4 |
T5 |
T6 |
1 |
Shoot length (cm) |
22.0 |
23.1 |
18.0 |
23.9 |
16.4 |
24.6 |
2 |
Root length (cm) |
7.2 |
7.4 |
6.4 |
8.0 |
7.0 |
8.3 |
3 |
Plant height (cm) |
29.2 |
30.5 |
24.4 |
31.9 |
23.4 |
32.9 |
4 |
Leaf length (cm) |
3.8 |
5.3 |
5.1 |
5.2 |
5.3 |
5.9 |
5 |
Leaf width (cm) |
2.1 |
2.3 |
2.1 |
2.5 |
2.1 |
2.3 |
6 |
Leaf area (cm) |
4.0 |
6.1 |
5.4 |
6.5 |
5.6 |
6.8 |
7 |
No. of nodules (Nos) |
1 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
Plant fresh weight (mg) |
200 |
300 |
200 |
400 |
250 |
400 |
9 |
Plant dry weight (mg) |
2.0 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
10.0 |
3.5 |
5.0 |
T1 Control (with out Rhizobium), T2 Rhizobium (R Mutant seed inoculation), T3 Rhizobium (R Native seed inoculation), T4 Rhizobium (R Mutant seed inoculation + foliar spray), T5 Rhizobium (R Native seed inoculation + foliar spray), T6 Combined effect of Native and Rhizobium.
TABLE 5: 45TH DAY MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF V.MUNGO PLANT
S.no |
Parameters |
T1 |
T2 |
T3 |
T4 |
T5 |
T6 |
1 |
Shoot length (cm) |
21.6 |
24.2 |
21.3 |
23.5 |
22.0 |
24.3 |
2 |
Root length (cm) |
9.4 |
9.8 |
11.4 |
11.6 |
12.5 |
13.0 |
3 |
Plant height (cm) |
31.0 |
35.0 |
32.7 |
34.9 |
34.5 |
37.3 |
4 |
Leaf length (cm) |
4.4 |
5.9 |
4.5 |
5.8 |
6.0 |
6.3 |
5 |
Leaf width (cm) |
2.8 |
3.0 |
2.9 |
3.5 |
3.1 |
3.6 |
6 |
Leaf area (cm) |
6.2 |
8.9 |
6.5 |
10.2 |
9.3 |
11.3 |
7 |
No. of nodules (Nos) |
2 |
2 |
6 |
10 |
2 |
5 |
8 |
Plant fresh weight (mg) |
550 |
800 |
600 |
900 |
700 |
850 |
9 |
Plant dry weight (mg) |
5.0 |
17.5 |
10.0 |
20.0 |
10.0 |
15.0 |
T1 Control (with out Rhizobium), T2 Rhizobium (R Mutant seed inoculation), T3 Rhizobium (R Native seed inoculation), T4 Rhizobium (R Mutant seed inoculation + foliar spray), T5 Rhizobium (R Native seed inoculation + foliar spray) T6 Combined effect of Native and Rhizobium.
CONCLUSION: In the current investigation, the UV mutant Rhizobium sp were treated by V.mungo L., the foliar spray treatment seen highly responsible growth in plant height, leaf area and no. of root nodules, while only treated UV mutant Rhiozobium sp. when compared to control plant.
From this study conclude by some mutation occur in DNA basepair (AGTC), so get high results.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The authors wish to thankful of Mardupandiyar College, Vallam, Thanjavur, for extending the facilities to carry out the laboratory studies.
REFERENCES:
- Ahmad F, Ahmad I and Khan MS: Screening of free-living rhizospheric bacteria for their multiple plant growth promoting activities. Microbiology Research 2008: 163; 173-18.
- Ashfaq M, Rehman MA and Ali A: The impact of optimum dosages of mineral in various combination on larval development and silk production of Bombx mori L. J. Biol. Sci 2000: 3; 1391-1392.
- Deb K, Deb B and Pandey P: Isolation and characterization of root nodule bacteria associated with Cassia alata of Southern parts of Assam, India. J. Pure App. Biosci 2015: 3 (1); 58-63.
- Deshwal VK and Chaubey A: Isolation and Characterization of Rhizobium leguminosarum from Root nodule of Pisum sativum Journal of Academia and Industrial Research 2014: 2(8).
- Eskin N: Colonization of Zea mays by the Nitrogen Fixing Bacterium Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus
- Fischer SE, Fischer SI, Magris S and Mori GB: Isolation and characterization of bacteria from the rhizosphere of wheat. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol 2007: 23; 895-903
- Gauri, Singh AK, Bhatt RP, Pant S, Bedi MK and Naglot A: Characterization of Rhizobium isolated from root nodules of Trifolium alexandrinum. Journal of Agricultural Technology 2011: 7(6); 1705-1723.
- Ghosh PKJ, Ganguly P, Maji T and Maiti TK: Production and composition of extracellular polysaccharide synthesized by Rhizobium undicola isolated from aquatic legume, Neptunia oleracea Lour,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences 2014
- Ghosh PKJ, Kumar De T and Kanti Maiti T: Production and Metabolism of Indole Acetic Acid in Root Nodules and Symbiont (Rhizobium undicola) Isolated from Root Nodule of Aquatic Medicinal Legume Neptunia oleracea Lour. Journal of Botany 2015: 24(5); 35-46.
- Grongroft A, Mosebach JL, Landschreiber L and Eschenbach A: Mashare Soils. Biodiversity & Ecology 2013: 5; 105-108.
- Hilali A, Prevost D, Broughton WJ and Antoun H: Effect of inoculation with strains of PGPR on the Wheat in Morocco soils. Crop Sciences 2001: 47(6); 590-593.
- Margullis L, Dolan MF and Guerrero R: The chimeric eukaryote: origin of the nucleus from the karyomastigont in amitochondriate protists. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2000: 97; 6954-9.
- Mohammadi K and Sohrabi Y: Bacterial Biofertilizers for Sustainable Crop Production: A Review. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 2012; 7: 307-316.
- Nozaki H: A new scenario of plastid evolution: plastid primary endosymbiosis before the divergence of the “Plantae,” emended. J Plant Res 2005: 118; 247-248.
- Sapp J: The dynamics of symbiosis: an historical overview. Can J Bot 2004: 82; 1046-56.
- Sharma MK and Kumawat DM: A study on evaluation of nitrogen fixation potential in soybean cultivar using commercial and indigenous strains. European Journal of Experimental Biology 2011: 1; (4):93-97.
- Singh B, Kaur R. and Singh K: Characterization of Rhizobium strain isolated from the roots of Trigonella foenumgraecum (fenugreek). J. Biotechnol 2008: 7(20); 3671-3676.
- Wagh DS, Shermale RN and Mahure BV: Isolation and Characterization of Nitrogen Fixing Bacteria from Agricultural Rhizosphere. Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science 2015: 8; 48-52.
- Weber T: Mashare Climate. Biodiversity & Ecology 2013: 5:103-104.
How to cite this article:
Rani ASS, Parthiban P and Mahesh V: Difference between native and mutant rhizobium on growth of Vigna mungo L. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2016; 7(9): 3848-51.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.7(9).3848-51.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
37
3848-51
331
1242
English
IJPSR
Shijila Rani AS, P. Parthiban * and V. Mahesh
Department of Microbiology, Marudupandiyar College, Vallam, Thanjavur, Tamilnadu, India
jprpaul2010@gmail.com
16 April, 2016
28 May, 2016
13 June, 2016
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.7(9).3848-51
01 September 2016