DoE ASSISTED UV-VISIBLE SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC METHOD DEVELOPMENT FOR CRITICAL FACTOR ESTIMATION INVOLVED IN NORFLOXACIN DEGRADATION
HTML Full TextDoE ASSISTED UV-VISIBLE SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC METHOD DEVELOPMENT FOR CRITICAL FACTOR ESTIMATION INVOLVED IN NORFLOXACIN DEGRADATION
R. Singh 1, J. Upadhyay * 2 and D. Singh 2
Lloyd Institute of Management and Technology (Pharm.) 1, Greater Noida - 201306, Uttar Pradesh, India.
University of Petroleum and Energy Studies 2, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Energy Acres Building, Bidholi, Dehradun - 248007, Uttarakhand, India.
ABSTRACT: Degradation studies are essential to determine the inference of degradation routes and stability of pharmaceuticals at different stress conditions. Norfloxacin is an extensively used antibiotics; hence, it is also commonly found in wastewater effluent. For proper risk assessment of norfloxacin and for better understanding of the factors involved in its environmental fate, different factors were studied which were involved in the degradation of norfloxacin. Effect on degradation was studied for three factors, i.e., time (24 h, 48 h, and 72 h), temperature (30°, 45°, and 70°), and concentration of oxidant (1% H2O2, 3% H2O2, and 5% H2O2) at three different levels using Design of experiment (DoE) approach. Absorbance was selected as a response that would signify the extent of degradation of the drug. It was observed that all three factors were involved in degradation but when the factors are studied one at a time, the effect of temperature and concentration of oxidant was more significant and time has a very small effect on the degradation of norfloxacin. When multiple factors were studied at one time, the interaction between the factors is observed, which are represented by 2D plots and 3D contour plots.
Keywords: |
Wastewater, Norfloxacin, Stress, Degradation, Design of Experiment
INTRODUCTION: Norfloxacin is one of the commonly used first-generation fluoroquinolone based antibacterial drug. It is being used for the treatment of urinary tract infections for past many years. Chemically, it is 1-Ethyl-6-fluoro-1,4-dihydro-4-oxo-7(1-piperazinyl)-3-quinoline carboxylic acid 1-4. The Norfloxacin acts by inhibition of the enzymes topoisomerase II (DNA gyrase) and topoisomerase IV, which are essential for bacterial DNA replication, transcription, repair, and recombination 5.
Norfloxacin acts differently from penicillins, cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, macrolides, and tetracyclines; therefore, the microorganisms which are resistant to these classes of drugs may be susceptible to and other fluoroquinolones 6. Due to the common usage of Norfloxacin, it has been very commonly found in wastewater effluent. This can lead to a potential risk to the ecosystem and human health due to increased bacterial drug resistance 7.
In a study, 20 degradation products were found for ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin in ozonated wastewater 8. Several analytical methods for norfloxacin have been described in scientific literature, such as UV spectrophotometry, liquid chromatography, high-performance thin-layer chromatography, etc., amongst others 9-12.
FIG. 1: NORFLOXACIN
Forced Degradation Studies: Forced degradation studies or stress studies are conducted on the sample using different conditions such as acid, alkaline, oxidative, thermal, and photolytic degradations. The sample is exposed to these conditions for different time intervals followed by instrumental analysis, usually by HPLC or LC-MS 13-15.
Regulatory Guidelines: There are various International guidelines that recommend forced degradation studies 16-18. The most commonly followed guidelines are of ICH:
ICH Q1A: Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products,
ICH Q1B: Photostability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products,
ICH Q2B: Validation of Analytical Procedures: Methodology.
The objective of forced degradation is to (i) Development of degradation pathways of drug substances and drug products. (ii) Recognizing the chemical properties of drug molecules. (iii) Elucidation of the structure of degradation products. (iv) Resolve stability-related problems. (v) Establishment of the intrinsic stability of a drug substance in the formulation. (vi) Identification of the degradation mechanisms of the drug substance and drug product. (vii) Distinguish between degradation products related to drug products from those that are generated from non-drug products in a formulation. (viii) Generation of stability-indicating nature of a developed method. (ix) Production of more stable formulations and determination of expiry date of a particular formulation. (x) Generation of degradation profile same as that observed in a formal stability study under ICH conditions 19-22.
Degradation can be induced by the Several Conditions:
Acidic and Basic Conditions: The stability of the drug substance depends upon the class and concentrations of acid or base taken. Hydrochloric acid or sulphuric acids (0.1-1 M) used for acid hydrolysis, whereas sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxides (0.1-1M) are used for base hydrolysis 23, 24. For poorly soluble compounds, co-solvents are used 24.
Thermal Condition: According to ICH Q1A accelerated testing conditions, thermal degradation (e.g., dry heat and wet heat) should be carried out under more strenuous conditions. For dry and wet heat, samples of solid-state drug substances and drug products should be exposed. For dry heat, liquid drug products should be exposed. At higher temperatures, studies performed at a shorter period. Thermal degradation of a substance can be studied by Arrhenius equation 26.
Photolytic Condition: The drug substance didn’t affect by light exposure but affected by photo stability. For primary degradants of drug substance photostability performed by exposure to UV or fluorescent conditions. Various ICH guidelines are recommended for photo stability testing 27.
Humidity: The potential degradants in the finished product and active pharmaceutical ingredient is humidity. For the establishment of forced degradation samples 90% humidity for one week is recommended 28.
Oxidation Condition: Hydrogen peroxide is commonly used for oxidation. Metal ions, oxygen, MnO2, ozone, and radical initiators: azobi-isobutyro-nitrile (AIBN) also used for oxidation degradation. The structure of the drug helps in selecting the concentration and condition of oxidizing agents. In the oxidative degradation of drug substance, an electron transfer mechanism is most common 25. There are various oxidative degradation products reported in literature. The most common degradation pathway for degradation is (i) oxidation of the piperazinyl substituent, (ii) monohydroxylation, and (iii) formation of dimeric products. Fig. 2 shows some of the common degradation products of Norfloxacin formed by oxidation of piperazinyl substituent 29.
FIG. 2: DEGRADATION PRODUCTS OF NORFLOXACIN FORMED BY OXIDATION OF PIPERAZINYL SUBTITUENT USING LACCASE MEDIATOR 2,2-AZINO-BIS-(3-ETHYLBENZTHIAZOLINE-6-SULFONIC ACID) DIAMMONIUM SALT
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Chemicals and Reagents: Analytically pure Norfloxacin was obtained as a gift sample from Nakoda Chemicals Hyderabad, India. All chemicals and reagents used were of analytical grade. Hydrogen peroxide was obtained from Central Drug House (P) Ltd. Sodium hydroxide was obtained from Central Drug House (P) Ltd.
Instrumentation: UV Visible Spectrophotometer (Shimadzu 1800), Hot Plate (HICON), Water Bath (HICON), Micropipette (CWS Series), Weighing Balance (Scale-Tec), Distilled water (In-house distillery).
Sample Preparation:
Forced Degradation in Oxidation Condition: A solution of 3% H2O2 was prepared by adding 10ml H2O2 in 100ml distilled water. 5mg Norfloxacin was added in a volumetric flask, and volume was made up to 100ml with H2O2, and it was labeled as stock solution (50ppm). 10ml was drawn from the stock solution in a volumetric flask, and the volume was makeup to 100ml with 3% H2O2 (5ppm). A volumetric flask containing 5ppm norfloxacin was kept at 80○C for 96 h in a water bath. At an interval of 24 h (24, 48, 72, 96 h) sample was drawn, and a spectrum was taken.
Central Composite Design (CCD) part of Response Surface Design was used to find the impact of temperature, oxidizing agent, and time on the degradation of Norfloxacin under oxidative conditions. The factors which were selected for the study were the concentration of the oxidizing agent, time, and temperature, as shown in Table 1. Each factor was studied at three different levels
- Concentration of oxidizing agent: Levels- 1%, 3% and 5%.
- Time: Levels- 24-h, 48-h and 72-h.
- Temperature: Levels- 30○, 45○ , and 70○.
TABLE 1: DESIGN WITH FACTORS AS CONCENTRATION OF OXIDANT, TIME AND TEMPERATURE
Run | Concentration of Oxidant | Time | Temp. |
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
2 | 1 | -1 | -1 |
3 | -1 | 1 | 1 |
4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
5 | 0 | -1 | 0 |
6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7 | -1 | -1 | 1 |
8 | -1 | 0 | 0 |
9 | 0 | 0 | -1 |
10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
12 | -1 | -1 | -1 |
13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
18 | 1 | 1 | -1 |
19 | 1 | -1 | 1 |
20 | -1 | 1 | -1 |
TABLE 2: CODING THE FACTORS AFFECTING OXIDATION DEGRADATION
Factors | Codes
-1 |
0 |
1 |
Concentration of oxidant (%) | 1 | 3 | 5 |
Time (hours) | 24 | 48 | 72 |
Temperature (○C) | 30 | 45 | 70 |
TABLE 3: ABSORBANCE OF NORFLOXACIN AT DIFFERENT CONCENTRATION
S. no | Concentration (ppm) | Absorbance |
1 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 2.5 ppm | 0.462 |
3 | 5 ppm | 0.813 |
4 | 7.5 ppm | 1.146 |
5 | 10 ppm | 1.546 |
RESULTS: The samples were taken according to table 1 and were analyzed using spectrum mode of UV spectrometer at wavelength 272.4 nm. Absorbance was taken as the response, and the data was analyzed using Design expert 11. The responses obtained are shown in Table 4.
Spectra of different samples are shown from Fig. 3-11. A calibration plot was made using different concentrations of norfloxacin (2.5ppm, 5ppm, 7.5ppm, and 10ppm) to check linearity. With an increase in time (24 h to 72 h), a decrease in absorbance is observed, which means increased degradation though the effect is low as compared to that of temperature and concentration of oxidant. Fig. 6 shows the graph for this trend. When two factors (a) concentration of oxidant and (b) time (temperature is kept constant as 45 °C) are studied simultaneously, it is observed that degradation is minimum at low concentration and at low time point. The degradation increases with increased concentration of oxidant and for a longer period of time. Fig. 7 shows the graph for this trend. When two factors (a) concentration of oxidant and (b) temperature (time is kept constant as 48 h) are studied simultaneously, it is observed that degradation is minimum at low concentration and at low time point. The degradation increases with increased concentration of oxidant and for a longer period of time. Fig. 8 shows the graph for this trend. When two factors (a) time and (b) temperature (concentration of oxidant is kept constant as 3%) are studied simultaneously, it is observed that degradation is minimum at low concentration and at low time point. The degradation increases with increased concentration of oxidant and for a longer period of time. Fig. 9 shows the graph for this trend.
Contour plots Fig. 10, Fig. 11, and Fig. 12 shows the interaction between the factors. Absorbance is less when all three factors are at their lowest levels. When the concentration of H2O2 has increased to 3% the absorbance decreases (time and temperature at their lowest level), but in Fig. 12 the absorbance increases to some extent when all the three factors are at their maximum levels.
TABLE 4: ABSORBANCE (RESPONSE) FOR DIFFERENT LEVELS OF SELECTED FACTORS CONCENTRATION OF OXIDANT, TIME, AND TEMPERATURE
Run | Factor 1
(Conc. of Oxidan) |
Factor 2
(Time) |
Factor 3
(Temp.) |
Response
(Abs) |
1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.629 |
2 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 0.501 |
3 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 0.560 |
4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.568 |
5 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0.548 |
6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.502 |
7 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 0.541 |
8 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 0.567 |
9 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0.533 |
10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.524 |
11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.495 |
12 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 0.987 |
13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.509 |
14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.511 |
15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.599 |
16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.516 |
17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.512 |
18 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0.642 |
19 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 0.595 |
20 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 0.585 |
FIG. 4: PLOT SHOWING EFFECT OF SINGLE FACTOR i.e., CONCENTRATION OF OXIDIZING AGENT
FIG. 5: PLOT SHOWING EFFECT OF SINGLE FACTOR i.e., TEMPERATURE
FIG. 6: PLOT SHOWING EFFECT OF SINGLE FACTOR i.e., TIME
FIG. 7: PLOT SHOWING SIMULTANEOUS EFFECT OF TWO FACTORS i.e., CONCENTRATION OF OXIDANT AND TIME
FIG. 8: PLOT SHOWING SIMULTANEOUS EFFECT OF TWO FACTORS i.e., CONCENTRATION OF OXIDANT AND TEMPERATURE
FIG. 9: PLOT SHOWING SIMULTANEOUS EFFECT OF TWO FACTORS i.e., TIME AND TEMPERATURE
FIG. 10: CONTOUR PLOT BETWEEN TEMPERATURE AND TIME WHEN H2O2 IS 1%
FIG. 11: CONTOUR PLOT BETWEEN TEMPERATURE AND TIME WHEN H2O2 IS 3%
FIG. 12: CONTOUR PLOT BETWEEN TEMPERATURE AND TIME WHEN H2O2 IS 5%
CONCLUSION: Study of factors affecting norfloxacin's degradation gives a better picture of the environmental fate of norfloxacin, which is often found as a wastewater effluent in a significant amount. All three factors, the concentration of oxidant, temperature, and time were involved in degradation. The single-factor response shows degradation is mostly affected by the temperature and concentration of oxidant. When multiple factors are studied at one time, it is observed that all factors have a significant effect. Degradation is less at a low concentration of oxidant, temperature, and time but it increases when any of the factors is increased. Contour plots showed an interaction between factors and degradation significantly increases with increase in the concentration of oxidant even when the temperature and time are at low levels. It is also observed that there is some increase in absorbance when all three factors are at their maximum levels.
This is an interesting observation, and the increase in response may be due to the formation of a degradation product with higher absorbance than the parent compound. Though, to validate it, sophisticated instruments LC-MS are required. To recapitulate, the study will be helpful to control or manipulate the degradation of Norfloxacin to reduce its risk. It will give a better understanding of the factors involved in the rate of degradation of Norfloxacin.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Nil
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: Nil
REFERENCES:
- The Merck Index: An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals: USA: Merck & Co, Fifteen Edition 2013.
- Indian Pharmacopoeia. The Indian Pharmacopoeia commission, Eighth Edition 2018.
- The United States Pharmacopoeia 30 / The National Formulary 25”. United States: The United State Pharmacopoeia Convention 2006; 2778-79.
- Florey Klaus. Analytical Profiles of Drug Substances. Academic Press/ an imprint of Elsevier 2004; 557-58.
- Goodman and Gillman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. McGraw Hill, New York, Twelfth Edition 2011.
- Rang HP, Dale MM, Ritter JM and Flower RJ: Rang and Dale’s Pharmacology. Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, 6th edition, 2007; 672-74.
- Bedor DCG, Gonçalves TM, Bastos LL and Miranda CE: Development and validation of a new method for the quantification of norfloxacin by HPLC-UV and its application to a comparative pharmacokinetic study in human volunteers. Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2007; 34(10): 231-38.
- Lee HB, Peart TE and Sovoda ML: Determination of ofloxacin, norfloxacin, and ciprofloxacin in sewage by selective solid-phase extraction, liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection, and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography 2007; 1139(1): 45-52.
- Lin CE, Deng YJ, Liao WS, Sun SW, Lin WY and Chen CC: Electrophoretic behavior and pKa determination of quinolones with a piperazinyl substituent by capillary zone electrophoresis. J of Chromato A 2004; 1051: 283-90.
- Bibi N, Ullah I and Khan MA: Quality Testing and Antimicrobial Activity of Norfloxacin in Pakistan. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences 2016; 17(1): 165-71.
- Rahman N and Ahmed Y: Kinetic spectrophotometric method for the determination of norfloxacin in pharma-ceutical formulations. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 2004; 57(2): 359-67.
- Sher M, Hussain MA, Mehmood MH, Hassan MN and Bashir S: Bioequivalence of Norfloxacin by HPLC-UV Method. J of the Chilean Chemical Society 2010; 203-05.
- ICH, Q2 (R1) Validation of analytical procedure: Text and Methodology. International Conference on Harmonization; 2005.https://www.gmp-compliance.org/guidelines/gmp-guideline/ich-q2r1-validation-of-analytical-procedures-text-and-methodolog accessed on April 2, 2020
- ICH, Q1A (R2) Stability testing of new drug substances and products (CPMP/ICH/2736/99); European Medicines Agency 2003.
- Gajra B, Patel M and Patel DA: Validation of Analytical Procedures: Methodology ICH-Q2B Federal Register 2011; 1(2): 45-50.
- ICH Q6A specifications: test procedures and acceptance criteria for new drug substances and new drug products: chemical substances (CPMP/ICH/367/96) European Medicines Agency 2000.
- Iram F, Iram H, Iqbal MA and Hussain A: Forced Degradation Studies. Journal of analytical and Pharma-ceutical Research 2016; 3(6): 00073.
- Kovarikova P, Jiri K, Jiri D and Lucie T: HPLC study of glimepiride under hydrolytic stress conditions. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2004; 205-09.
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Guidance for industry Q1A (R2) stability testing of new drug substances and products in U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Rockville 2003; 22-28.
- Harmon P and Boccardi G: Oxidative susceptibility testing. Pharmaceutical Stress Testing: Predicting Drug Degradation. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2005; 153: 205-34.
- Alsante KM, Hatajik TD, Lohr LL, Santafianos D and Sharp TR: Solving impurity/degradation problems: case studies. pp: 380, In; Handbook of Isolation and Characterization of impurities in Pharmaceutical, Ahuja S, Alsante K, editors, Academics Press, New York, 2003.
- Oyler AR, Segmuller BE, Sun Y, Polshyna A and Dunphy R: Forced degradation studies of rapamycin: Identification of autoxidation products. Journal of Pharmacetical and Biomedical Analysis 2012; 194-200.
- Ranjit S and Rehman Z: Current trends in forced degradation study for pharmaceutical product development. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Educational Research 2012; 54-63.
- Riddhiben MP, Piyushbhai MP and Natubhai MP: Stability indicating HPLC method development-a review. International Research Journal of Pharmacy 2011; 79-87.
- Annapurna MM, Mohapatro CM and Narendra A: Stability indicating liquid chromatographic method for the determination of Letrozolein pharmaceutical formulation. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis 2012; 298- 305.
- Kats M: Forced degradation studies: regulatory consi-derations and implementation. Bio Pharm Int 2005; 1-7.
- Tollison WH, Cherng SH, Xia Q, Boudreau M, Yin JJ, Wamer WG, Howard PC, Yu H and Fu PP: Photo-decomposition and Phototoxicity of Natural Retinoids. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2005; 2(1): 147-55.
- ICH Q3A (R2) Impurities in New Drug Substances and Products (Step 4). International Conference on Harmonization 2006; 1-15.
- Prieto A, Möder M, Rodil R, Adrian L and Marco-Urrea E: Degradation of the antibiotics norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin by a white-rot fungus and identification of degradation products. Biores Tech 2011; 102: 10987-95.
How to cite this article:
Singh R, Upadhyay J and Singh D: DoE assisted uv-visible spectrophotometric method development for critical factor estimation involved in norfloxacin degradation. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2020; 11(12): 6289-96. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(12).6289-96.
All © 2013 are reserved by the International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
43
6289-6296
829
683
English
IJPSR
R. Singh, J. Upadhyay * and D. Singh
University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Bidholi, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
jupadhyay@ddn.upes.ac.in
13 December 2019
06 April 2020
10 April 2020
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(12).6289-96
01 December 2020