EFFICACY OF MASSOIA OIL IN COMBINATION WITH SOME INDONESIAN MEDICINAL PLANTS OILS AS ANTI-BIOFILM AGENT TOWARDS CANDIDA ALBICANS
HTML Full TextEFFICACY OF MASSOIA OIL IN COMBINATION WITH SOME INDONESIAN MEDICINAL PLANTS OILS AS ANTI-BIOFILM AGENT TOWARDS CANDIDA ALBICANS
S. U. T. Pratiwi *1, 2 and T. Hertiani 1, 2
Department of Pharmaceutical Biology 1, Centre for Natural Anti-infective Research (CNAIR) 2, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gadjah Mada University, Sekip Utara, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia.
ABSTRACT: Microbial resistance to antibiotics is often caused by biofilm formation of the microbial pathogen. One strategy used to combat this recalcitrance mechanism is by using the combination of antimicrobial drugs. Essential oils have evoked interest as sources of natural products and represent an alternative approach in combating microbial pathogen. The aim of the present work was to investigate the possible synergistic activity of Massoia aromatica oil in combination with Cinnamomum burmanii, Ocimum basilicum, Citrus hystrix and Piper betle oils against Candida albicans biofilm. Biofilm formation inhibition assay and biofilmdegradation assay of essential oils were determined using microtiter broth method. The Fractional inhibitory concentration indices (FICI) of essential oils in combinations were calculated from the checkerboard assay. The synergistic activity was found in combination of M. aromatica oil with all the essential oil tested in inhibit the formation of intermediate stage of C. albicans bio-film. The interaction of M. aromatica oil with all the essential oil tested in inhibit the formation of mature stage of C. albicans biofilm were varied from synergistic to neutral, however, the activity of essential oils combination in breaking down the established biofilm were found to be less active. The results obtained clearly indicate that combinations of these oils are potential for enhancing their anti biofilm properties. This research could contribute to the development of new strategies to prevent and treat C. albicans biofilm infections.
Keywords: |
Essential oils, Biofilm, Candida albicans, Checkerboard method, Synergism
INTRODUCTION: Opportunistic fungal infection is the leading cause of death in patients with immune-suppression such as cancer and HIV. The high rate resistance of the fungal pathogen to antifungal drugs also reduce the success of antifungal therapy. Candida albicans is one of the few species of the Candida genus that cause local and systemic infections in humans, and is responsible for the majority of nosocomial infections and for 50-90% of all cases of invasive candidiasis in humans 1, 2.
The ability of C. albicans in causing the disease is closely related to its ability to grow as a biofilm community. The ability of Candida to attach and colonize a variety number of surfaces, including surfaces of medical devices such as IUDs (intrauterine devices), implants or prosthesis and form a biofilm makes Candida resistant to antifungal drugs 3.
Biofilm itself is a natural condition where microbes tend to live in colonies instead of planktonic (drifting free, individualistic, and quickly divide), attached to a surface and secrete an extracellular polymeric substance (EPS). EPS binds multiple layers of microbial cells and produce biofilm matrix, and serves as a protection against external factors that might harm microbial growth such as antimicrobials and immune systems.
Microorganisms in biofilm are generally more resistant to antimicrobial compounds and the host's defense mechanisms than planktonic cells. This fact makes biofilm a source of progressive infections. It is difficult for antimicrobial compounds to provide the intended effect on microbes because of the EPS barrier, and also because microbes grow in biofilms have a slower growth rate compared to when these microbes are in planktonic state 4. In the human body biofilm commonly encountered in dental plaque, in the lungs of patients cystic fibrosis, and in the medical devices implanted as implants in the body such as contact lens, artificial joint in the joints, pacemakers, catheters, IUD, etc. 3.
Nowadays biofilm infection is become a major problem in health, since microbial communities within the biofilm matrix is highly resistant to antimicrobial agents. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) states that biofilms are the cause of the majority of infections in humans 5. In many cases, the treatment of biofilm infection caused by microbial biofilms on implants has to be done by removing the implant and replace it with the new one, and this procedure is time consuming, high cost and often life-threatening. To date there are very few chemotherapeutic agent that has the ability to kill microbes in a biofilm phase 6.
Although the mechanism of resistance against Candida biofilms antifungal drugs is still poorly understood, anti-fungal action likely prevented by its ability to penetrate the biofilm matrix 7. The ability of Candida biofilm to grow well on the surface of implants such as catheters, prosthetic heart valves, contact lenses, artificial joints and the intra-urine (IUD) which can cause bloodstream infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality among hospitalized patients 8, 9.
Natural compounds derived from medicinal plants are known to have contribution in the development of modern medicine and in the formulation of herbal preparations in traditional medicine systems. Essential oil is one of the natural compounds that are considered quite promising for the discovery of new antimicrobial agents 10. The combination use of potent antifungal compounds is one of the strategies to improve the efficacy of antifungal drugs. The mechanism of this combination is expected to reduce the efficacious dose of antifungal drugs, minimize its side effects, and provide solutions to overcome the problem of fungal resistance 11.
In this study we have analyzed the possibility of synergistic activity of Massoia aromatic oil in combination with other essential oils against Candida albicans biofilm, which could increase antifungal drug effectiveness, thus are expected to be able to reduce the level of Candida resistance. Considering the fact that some essential oils such as massoia oil are quite irritating, it is expected that by combining essential oils could reduce the irritant properties without reducing its effectiveness in inhibiting and / or breakdown the C. albicans biofilm. In our previous study 12 we explored the activity of M. aromatica oil against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus biofilm, however, to our knowledge, up to date this is the first study that was carried out to evaluate the synergy of M. aromatica oil with Piper betle, Cinnamomum burmanii, Ocimum basilicum and Citrus hystrix oils against Candida albicans. In this study, the minimum inhibitory concentration of the essential oils tested, both in single and combinations, towards the growth of C. albicans planktonic and biofilm is discussed. TLC and GCMS were also performed to determine the content of essential oil compounds tested.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Fungal strain and growth condition: A standard strain of Candida albicans ATCC 10231 was cultured in Sabouraud planktonic Dextrose Broth (SDB) medium and incubated at 37⁰C with agitation (120 rpm) for 24 h. Following incubation, cells were sedimented by centrifugation (5000 x g for 15 min at 4˚C), washed twice with 5 mL of sterile PBS (phosphate buffered saline) buffer pH 7.2, and finally suspended to 107 cells/mL by adjusting the optical density of the suspension to 0.38 at 520 nm13, 14.
Medicinal plants and essential oil extraction: A list of the plants studied, including the botanical name and voucher specimen are listed in Table 1. The plants were collected from Yogyakarta, Indonesia and its surroundings on the basis of ethno pharmacological information. The species were identified, authenticated, and voucher specimens were preserved in Department of Pharmaceutical Biology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia for further reference. Plant essential oils were obtained by water-steam distillation process. Oil samples obtained were dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate (Na2SO4), filtered using a whatman filter paper no. 40, and stored in sealed dark glass vial at 4°C for further use.
Essential oil’s chemical composition analysis: Gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used to identify the main constituents of essential oils tested according to the method of Wu et al. 15 on a GC-2010 gas chromatography (Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with a GC-MS-QP2010 Plus mass spectrometer (Shimadzu, Japan). An Rxi-5MS capillary column (30 m length, 0.25 mm diameter, 0.25 µm film thickness, Shimadzu, Japan) was used for separation. A split injector was used and diluted samples (1/100 in ethyl acetate, v/v) of 1.0 mL were injected by an auto sampler in the split mode (1/153). The oven temperature was programmed from 60⁰C to 290⁰C at a rate of 10⁰C ml-1. Helium was used as the carrier gas. Qualitative identification of compounds was performed by comparisons of their relative retention times and mass spectra with those recorded in the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) database. Quantitative analysis of each essential oil component (expressed as area percentage) was carried out by peak area normalization measurement.
Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of plant oils: Minimum Inhibitory concentration (MIC) of plant essential oils against C. albicans planktonic cells (PMIC) were determined using microdilution method measured by optical density. The PMIC assays were performed in triplicate in microtiter plates and used an inoculums of 1 x 103 CFU/mL in SDB. The final volume including SDB, cells and test compound in each well was 200 µl. The assay of plant essential oils involved in serial, twofold dilutions using SDB, starting at 1% v/v and ending at 0.06 % v/v in methanol. As positive control, Nystatin with concentration of 500 µg/mL was used, and as vehicle control, wells received SDB, Methanol (MeOH) and C. albicans inoculums. Negative control wells received only SDB and C. albicans inoculums. Inhibition was monitored based on OD595 of treated vs control after 48 hours of incubation at 37°C 16. PMIC50 was calculated using probit analysis.
Effect of plant essential oils on C. albicans biofilm formation inhibition and breakdown: The susceptibility study of C. albicans biofilm to essential oils tested, alone and in combinations was carried out using micro broth dilution method 17. Biofilms were formed on polystyrene flat bottom 96-well microtiter plates (Iwaki). Briefly, 100 µL of a standardized cell suspension (107 cells/mL) on RPMI 1640 medium without sodium bicarbonate supplemented with L-glutamine (Sigma) was transferred into each well of a microtiter plate, and the plate was incubated for 90 minutes at 37 ˚C of adhesion phase. RPMI 1640 medium was used because this medium capable to induce hyphal formation in C. albicans. For media control, wells should be unseeded, and in negative control, biofilms were not exposed to antifungal agent. Following the adhesion phase, the cell suspension were aspirated and each wells was washed twice with 150 µL of PBS to remove loosely adhered cells. A total of 100 µl RPMI media containing various concentration of plant oils alone and in combinations (in ratios 1;1) were added to the washed wells. Nystation concentration of 500 µg/mL was usedas a positive control in this study, and methanol (MeOH) was used for vehicle control. The plates were then incubated at 37˚C for 24 hours for intermediate phase biofilm, and 48 hours for mature phase biofilm. Quantification of biofilm formed was done using XTT reduction assay using microtiter plates reader (Bio-Rad 680 XR) at 495 nm. Testing was performed in triplicate. Plant oils found to reduce at least 50% biofilm formation were considered as biofilm preventive, MBIC50 18.
To determine the effects of single and combined essential oils on C. albicans pre-formed biofilms, C. albicans biofilms were grown for 24, and 48 h at 37˚C on the wells of microtiter plates using the protocol described by Yu et al. 18. Briefly, 100 µL of a standardized cell suspension (107 cells/mL) on RPMI 1640 medium without sodium bicarbonate supplemented with L-glutamine (Sigma) was transferred into each well of a microtiter plate, and the plate was incubated for 24 and 48 hours at 37˚C. Following biofilm formation, the medium was aspirated and non adherent cells were removed by washing the biofilms three times in 150 µL sterile PBS per well. After each wash, residual PBS was remove by blotting the microtiter plates in an inverted position with paper towels. Various concentrations of plant essential oils (in RPMI 1640 medium), alone and in combinations, were then added to the washed wells and the plates were incubated at 37˚C for another 24 and 48 h. The capability of plant essential oils to breakdown C. albicans established biofilms were estimated using the XTT reduction assay as describes below.
XTT reduction assay: XTT (2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl) - 2H- tetrazolium -5 carboxa nilide) (Sigma) solution (0.5 g liter-1 PBS) was prepared, filter-sterilized using a 22-μm pore size filter, aliquot into 10 mL working volumes, and stored at -70˚C. A stock solution of 10 mM menadione (Sigma) in 100% acetone was prepared, filter sterilized, aliquot into smaller volume (about 50 μL) and stored at -70˚C. Prior to each assay, tubes containing 10 mL XTT solution were thawed and 1 µL of the stock solution of menadione was added to each tube of XTT solution to achieve a final menadione concentration of 1 µM.
The biofilm were first washed three times with 200 µl PBS, and then 100 µL of the XTT-menadione solution were added to each of the prewashed wells. The microtiter plate was then covered with aluminium foil and incubated in the dark for 2-3 h at 37˚C. Following incubation, 75-80 μL of the resulting colored supernatant from each wells was transferred to a new microtiter plate and the color change in the solution was measured with a microtiter plate reader at 495 nm. The absorbance values for the media controls were subtracted from the values for the test wells to calculate the minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) and minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC). MBIC50 and MBEC50 is the antifungal concentrations at which a 50% decrease in absorbance is detected in comparison with the control biofilms formed by the fungal isolate in the absence of antifungal drug 19. Dilutions of Massoia oil alone and its mixtures with other oils tested were prepared in a checkerboard format as per standard methodology. In order to assess results of MBIC and MBEC of oil in mixtures, the fractional inhibitory concentrations indexes (FICI) were calculated as: ΣFIC = FICa + FICb, where FICa is a MIC of massoia oil in combination / MIC of massoia oil alone; and FICb is a MIC of second oil in combination / MIC of second oil alone. Second oil is the oil which was tested in combination with massoia oil. FICI were interpreted as follow: synergism FIC ≤ 0.5; indifference 0.5<FIC≤4; antagonism FIC>4 20.
Statistical methods: Statistical significance of the data was determined using ANOVA, followed by Dunnett’s test. Differences were considered significant with P values of 0.05 or less.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Essential oil yields: Oil yields of the plant samples is presented in Table 1. Most plants had oil yield around 0.25-2.5 % w/w, and largest quantities were obtained from Citrus hystrix oil (20 % w/w).
TABLE 1: ESSENTIAL OIL YIELDS
Family | Binomial name | Local name | Voucher number | Volume oil obtained (mL) | Sample fresh weight (Kg) | Yield
(% v/w)a |
Lauraceae | Massoia aromatica Becc. | Masoyi | STP053 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
Cinnamomum burmanii Nees ex Bl. | Manis jangan | STP051 | 20 | 3 | 6.67 | |
Piperaceae | Piper betle | Sirih | STP099 | 10 | 5 | 2 |
Rutaceae | Citrus hystrix DC. | Jeruk purut | STP031 | 5 | 3 | 1.67 |
Labiatae | Ocimum basilicum L | Kemangi | STP046 | 2.5 | 5 | 0.5 |
GC-MS analysis: The principal components of the oils were determined using gas chromatography and identified by comparing the mass spectra of chemical compounds in essential oils with library mass spectra from NIST02 (www.nist.gov/index.html). In this study, the analysis by GC-MS showed that the major component of C. burmanii oil was cinnamic aldehyde (92.0 %). Alpha-copaene and 3-Phenyl-2-prophenyl acetate were present in small amount (4.10 % and 2.07 %, respectively), whereas massoia lactone (92.1 %) was the main constituent of M. aromatica essential oil, and benzyl benzoate was found in small amount (2.67%). Massoia lactone has a simple molecular structure with 10, 12 and 14 carbon chain components so that each one is called the C-10, C-12 and C-14 massoia lactone. This lactone is alleged to have role in the antimicrobial activity of Massoia oil 21, 12.
TABLE 2: MAJOR CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS OF C. BURMANNII AND M. AROMATICA ESSENTIAL OIL AS IDENTIFIED BY GC-MS
Essential oil sample | Peak | Retention time (RT) | Area | Area (%) | Similarity index (SI) | Chemical Component |
C. burmannii | 3 | 19.296 | 164665734 | 92.02 | 95 | Cinnamaldehyde |
5 | 21.630 | 7342238 | 4.10 | 93 | Alpha-Copaene | |
7 | 23.472 | 3708184 | 2.07 | 91 | 3-Phenyl-2-prophenyl acetate | |
M. aromatica | 3 | 25.346 | 156590945 | 92.05 | 94 | 5-Hydroxy-2-Decenoic acid lactone (Massoialactone) |
4 | 29.961 | 10522375 | 6.19 | 86 | 5-Hydroxy-2-Decenoic acid lactone (Massoialactone)* | |
5 | 37.473 | 1835119 | 1.08 | 80 | Benzoic acid | |
O. basilicum | 1 | 11.877 | 6622297 | 6.56 | 96 | 6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one |
2 | 15.188 | 9535731 | 9.44 | 97 | L-linalool | |
3 | 17.305 | 33293823 | 32.96 | 93 | Z-citral | |
4 | 17.959 | 47262357 | 46.79 | 94 | Geranial | |
C. hystrix | 2 | 9.117 | 2839381 | 11.86 | 93 | Limonene |
3 | 15.581 | 8004641 | 32.03 | 93 | Z-citral | |
4 | 16.497 | 13273920 | 53.12 | 93 | E-citral | |
P. betle | 3 | 11.496 | 11878056 | 40.01 | 96 | Sabinene |
5 | 12.142 | 3567823 | 12.02 | 97 | Beta-Myrcene | |
7 | 16.823 | 2739801 | 9.23 | 97 | Linalool | |
9 | 23.513 | 3072053 | 10.35 | 96 | Anethole | |
10 | 29.397 | 1040838 | 7.26 | 96 | Beta-Caryophylene |
FIG. 1 : PERCENTAGE OF C. ALBICANS PLANKTONIC GROWTH INHIBITION BY C. BURMANII (CB), O. BASILICUM (OB), P. BETLE (PB), C. HYSTRIX (CH), M. AROMATICA (MA) ESSENTIAL OIL AT CONCENTRATION RANGING FROM 1 – 0.06 % V/V. CONTROLS WERE: CV (VEHICLE CONTROL, METHANOL 1% v/v), CM (MEDIA, SDB), CN NEGATIVE CONTROL), NYS (NYSTATIN, POSITIVE CONTROL) 500 µG/ML.
From GCMS result we found out that the major chemical composition of the volatile oils from O. basilicum was Z-citral (32.03%), and Geranial (46.79%). The major components of C. hystrix oil were limonene (11.86%), Z-citral (32.03%), and E-citral (53.12%) citronelal (54.63%) and 3-Tetradecanol (30.31%), whereas the main constituents of P. betle were Sabinene (40.01%), Beta-Myrcene (12.02%) Linalool (9.23%), Anethole (10.35%), and Beta-Caryophylene (7.26%) (Table 2).
Screening and determination of MIC plant oils for Candida planktonic growth: The screening for anti candida activity and determination of PMIC of plant oils obtained by microdilution method are shown in Table 2 and Fig. 1. Majority of oils tested were found to have anti-Candida activity and only three of the oils (P. cubeba, S. oleosa and C. odoratum) were found failed to inhibit C. albicans growth at the highest concentration tested which was 1 % v/v. The oil from C. burmanii, M. aromatica, O. basilicum and the seeds of L. cubeba at lowest concentration tested (0.06 % v/v) were effective at inhibiting partial (50%) growth (PMIC50) of C. albicans.
Effect of plant essential oils on C. albicans biofilm formation: Candida albicans biofilm formation is proceeding in intermediate phase of development (12 – 30 h) 22. Plant essential oils at sub MIC concentration of 0.25% - 0.01% v/v was tested against C. albicans adherent cells populations at different stages of biofilm development. C. albicans biofilm formation occurs in three phases. The early phase is characterized by budding-yeast cell attachment to surfaces. The attached cells are proliferate, form micro colonies and deposit an extracellular matrix. Furthermore, Candida yeast cells transition into mycelia (dimorphism), and micro colonies are interconnected with the elongated hyphae, forming a confluent monolayer. The complexity of the biofilm increase after 24 hours, and C. albicans biofilm is composed of a mixture of yeast cells immersed among threads of pseudo-hyphae and true hyphae 22.
Using the MTT method, we have found that the inhibition of C. albicans biofilm formation by essential oils was dose dependent. The result of this experiment is shown in Table 3 and Fig. 2, demonstrated that partial (50%) inhibition of C. albicans intermediate biofilms occurred in the presence of all oils tested. C. burmanii oil showed MBIC50 at concentration of 0.02% v/v. At concentration of 0.03 % v/v this oil inhibited as much as 58.83 ± 0.03 % of C. albicans biofilm formation whereas at concentration of 0.01 % v/v gave as much as 33.97±0.00 % C. albicans biofilm formation.
The oils from the bark of M. aromatic exhibited the MBIC50 at concentration of 0.04 % v/v in order to inhibit the intermediate phase of C. albicans biofilm. Compare to C. burmani and M. aromatica oils, the oil obtained from the leaves of O. basilicum, P. betle, and C. hystrix showed less potent activity in inhibit intermediate and mature phase of C. albicans biofilm. Higher concentration (0.05% v/v, 0.09 % v/v, and 0, 19% v/v) were needed by these oils to inhibit intermediate phase of C. albicans biofilm (Fig. 2, Table 3).
TABLE 3: EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT ESSENTIAL OILS ON PLANKTONIC GROWTH AND BIOFILM FORMATION OF CANDIDA ALBICANS ATCC 10231. THE PMIC50 FOR GROWTH WAS TESTED IN THE RANGE OF 1–0.06 % V/V, WHEREAS THE MBIC50 FOR BIOFILM FORMATION AND MBEC50 FOR BIOFILM BREAKDOWN ACTIVITY WERE TESTED AT SUB-PMIC
Oil Sample
|
PMIC50 (% v/v) | MBIC50 oil in % v/v against 24 h Candida biofilm formation | MBIC50 oil in % v/v against 48 h Candida biofilm formation | MBEC50 oil in % v/v against 24 h established
Candida biofilm |
MBEC50 oil in % v/v against 48 h established Candida biofilm |
Cinnamomum burmanii Nees ex Bl. | 0.22 | 0.02 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
Citrus hystrix DC | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.57 | 0.50 | 0.51 |
Piper betle L. | 0.21 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.50 |
Ocimum basilicum L. | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.11 |
M. aromatica Becc | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.11 |
Higher concentration of oil was needed by all of the oils tested to eradicate the established biofilm. Oils from the bark of M. aromatica and P. betle showed capability in partial disrupting (50%) the intermediate formed Candida biofilm at concentration of 0.10% v/v (Fig. 3, Table 3), whereas lower concetration (0.01 % v/v and 0.04 % v/v) was needed by O. Basilicum and C. hystrix oil to be able to disrupt established C. albicans intermediate biofilm. However, higher concentrations were needed by all oils to be able to breakdown C. albicans mature biofilm (Fig. 3, Table 3).
FIG. 2: THE PERCENTAGE ACTIVITY OF C. BURMANII (CB), O. BASILICUM (OB), P. BETLE (PB), C. HYSTRIX (CH), M. AROMATICA (MA) ESSENTIAL OIL AT CONCENTRATION RANGING FROM 1 – 0.06 % V/VININHIBIT CANDIDA ALBICANS BIOFILM FORMATION AT INTERMEDIATE PHASE (A), AND AT MATURE PHASE (B). THE BARS INDICATED THE STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE MEANS.
FIG. 3: THE PERCENTAGE ACTIVITY OF C. BURMANII (CB), O. BASILICUM (OB), P. BETLE (PB), C. HYSTRIX (CH), M. AROMATICA (MA) ESSENTIAL OIL AT CONCENTRATION RANGING FROM 1 – 0.06 % V/VINBREAKINGDOWN ESTABLISHEDINTERMEDIATE PHASE OF CANDIDA ALBICANS BIOFILM (A), AND MATURE PHASE OF CANDIDA ALBICANS BIOFILM (B). THE BARS INDICATED THE STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE MEANS.
Effect of Massoia Oil in Combinations towards C. albicans biofilm: Anti-biofilm activity of essential oils tested in combination against intermediate phase and mature phase of C. albicans biofilm was determined using the microdilution method on microtiterplate polystyrene flat-bottom 96 wells in accordance with the test protocols by Coffey and Anderson 19.
Data obtained from different concentrations of oil tested (MBIC50 and sub MBIC50) mediated inhibition and disruption of preformed intermediate phase and mature phase of C. albicans biofilm, and Massoia oil in combination with other oils at concentration of MBIC50 and subMBIC50 showed higher activity in inhibit and breakdown preformed intermediate phase and mature phase of C. albicans biofilm. The result showed that combination of Massoia oil with C. burmanii oil, both at MBIC50 concentration (0.04 % v/v) could inhibit 86.70±0.78 % of C. albicans intermediate biofilm, whereas 50% of biofilm inhibition was obtained from the combination of Massoia oil at concentration of PMIC50 with C. burmanii at subPMIC50 concentration (0.008 % v/v), which in turn showed a synergistic effect of both oil in inhibit the growth of C. albicans biofilm. C. albicans intermediate phase of biofilm development was also partially (50%) inhibited by the mixture of Massoia oil at MBIC50 concentration with O. basilicum concentration of 0.01% v/v.
The mixture of these two oils also showed a synergistic activity towards C. albicans biofilm development. Moreover, the combination of MBIC50 concentration of Massoia oil with C. hystrix oil and P. betle oil at subPMIC50 concentrations (0.05 % v/v and 0.03 % v/v, respectively) also give partial inhibition towards C. albicans intermediate phase development, although the combinations activity of those oils were found to be indifference (Table 4, Fig. 4).
TABLE 4: FIC AND FICI VALUES DETERMINATION OF MASSOIA OIL IN COMBINATION AGAINST INTERMEDIATE PHASE OF C. ALBICANS BIOFILM.
Eos | MBIC50 (% v/v) Oil alone | MBIC50 of oil in mix with Massoia oil | FIC50 | FICI50 | Interpretation |
M. aromatica | 0.04 | - | - | - | |
C. burmanii | 0.04 | 0.008 | 0.20 | 0.24 | Synergy |
O. basilicum | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.20 | 0.24 | Synergy |
C. hystrix | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.55 | 0.59 | Indifference |
P. betle | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.6 | 0.64 | Indifference |
FIG. 4: INHIBITORY ACTIVITY OF ESSENTIAL OILS IN COMBINATION AT MBIC50 CONCENTRATIONS TOWARDSS THE INTERMEDIATE PHASE OF C. ALBICANS BIOFILM. NYSTATIN (500 µG/ML) WAS USED AS POSITIVE CONTROL. MEDIA = MEDIA CONTROL, NEG CTRL = NEGATIVE CONTROL, AND MEOH (METHANOL) AS CONTROL SOLVENTS. CB: CINNAMOMUMBURMANII, OB: OCIMUMBASILICUM, PB: PIPER BETLE, CH: CITRUS HYSTRIX, MA: MASSOIA AROMATICA
TABLE 5: FIC AND FICI VALUES DETERMINATION OF MASSOIA OIL IN COMBINATION AGAINST MATURE PHASE OF C. ALBICANS BIOFILM.
Eos | MBIC50 (% v/v) Oil alone | MBIC50 of oil in mix with Massoia oil | FIC50 | FICI50 | Interpretation |
M. aromatica | 0.11 | - | - | - | |
C. burmanii | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.22 | 0.33 | Synergy |
O. basilicum | 0.10 | 0.11 | 1.1 | 1.21 | Indifference |
C. hystrix | 0.57 | 0.15 | 0.26 | 0.37 | Synergy |
P. betle | 0.09 | 0.11 | 1.22 | 1.33 | Indifference |
Similar result was also found towards mature phase of C. albicans biofilm. The combination of Massoia oil at PMIC50 concentration (0.11 % v/v) with sub MBIC50 of C. burmanii oil (0.02 % v/v) and with C. hystrix oil at sub MBIC50 concentration (0.25 % v/v) could inhibit 50% of C. albicans mature phase biofilm, and give synergistic activity against mature phase of C. albicans biofilm. However, to be able to give 50% of C. albicans biofilm inhibition in combination with MBIC50 concentration of Massoia oil, higher concentration of MBIC50 was needed by O. basilicum oil and P. betle oil, i.e. 0.11% v/v. These combinations of oil also showed indifference activity compare to their activity alone towards mature phase of C. albicans biofilm (Table 5, Fig. 5).
FIG. 5: INHIBITORY ACTIVITY OF ESSENTIAL OILS IN COMBINATION AT MBIC50 CONCENTRATIONS TOWARDSS THE MATURE PHASE OF C. ALBICANS BIOFILM. NYSTATIN (500 µG/ML) WAS USED AS POSITIVE CONTROL. MEDIA = MEDIA CONTROL, NEG CTRL = NEGATIVE CONTROL, AND MEOH (METHANOL) AS CONTROL SOLVENTS. CB: CINNAMOMUMBURMANII, OB: OCIMUMBASILICUM, PB: PIPER BETLE, CH: CITRUS HYSTRIX, MA: MASSOIAAROMATICA.
TABLE 6: FIC AND FICI VALUES DETERMINATION OF MASSOIA OIL IN COMBINATION AGAINST INTERMEDIATE PHASE OF PREFORMED C. ALBICANS BIOFILM.
Eos | MBEC50 (% v/v) Oil alone | MBEC50 of oil in mix with Massoia oil | FIC50 | FICI50 | Interpretation |
M. aromatica | 0.01 | - | - | - | |
C. burmanii | 0.50 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.13 | Synergy |
O. basilicum | 0.10 | 0.23 | 2.3 | 2.31 | Indifference |
C. hystrix | 0.06 | 0.26 | 4.33 | 4.34 | Antagonism |
P. betle | 0.10 | 0.25 | 2.5 | 2.51 | Indifference |
Up to the highest levels of the test (0.5% v / v), essential oil of O. basilicum, C. hystrix, and P. betle combined with Massoia oil failed to degrade the mature phase of C. albicans biofilm. Masoia oil in combination with C. burmanii oil produces antagonism effect. This is likely due to the architecture of mature phase C. albicans biofilm which is composed of a dense network of yeast cells, and intertwined hyphae and pseudohyphae, embedded in anexopolimeric matrix substance. The structural complexity of C. albicans biofilm makes biofilm more resistant to antimicrobial agents compare to its planktonic counterpart.
FIG. 6: BREAKDOWN ACTIVITY OF ESSENTIAL OILS IN COMBINATION AT MBEC50 CONCENTRATIONS TOWARDSS THE INTERMEDIATE PHASE OF PREFORMED C. ALBICANS BIOFILM. NYSTATIN (500 µG/ML) WAS USED AS POSITIVE CONTROL. MEDIA = MEDIA CONTROL, NEG CTRL = NEGATIVE CONTROL, AND MEOH (METHANOL) AS CONTROL SOLVENTS. CB: CINNAMOMUMBURMANII, OB: OCIMUMBASILICUM, PB: PIPER BETLE, CH: CITRUS HYSTRIX, MA: MASSOIAAROMATICA.
TABLE 7: FIC AND FICI VALUES DETERMINATION OF MASSOIA OIL IN COMBINATION AGAINST MATURE PHASE OF PREFORMED C. ALBICANS BIOFILM.
Eos | MBEC50 (% v/v) Oil alone | MBEC50 of oil in mix with Massoia oil | FIC50 | FICI50 | Interpretation |
M. aromatica | 0.05 | - | - | - | |
C. burmanii | 0.51 | 0.12 | 0.23 | 0.28 | Synergy |
O. basilicum | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.94 | 0.99 | Synergy |
C. hystrix | 0.11 | 0.45 | 4.09 | 4.14 | Antagonism |
P. betle | 0.11 | 0.27 | 2.45 | 2.50 | Indifference |
FIG. 7: BREAKDOWN ACTIVITY OF ESSENTIAL OILS IN COMBINATION AT MBEC50 CONCENTRATIONS TOWARDSS THE MATURE PHASE OF PREFORMED C. ALBICANS BIOFILM. NYSTATIN (500 µG/ML) WAS USED AS POSITIVE CONTROL. MEDIA = MEDIA CONTROL, NEG CTRL = NEGATIVE CONTROL, AND MEOH (METHANOL) AS CONTROL SOLVENTS. CB: CINNAMOMUMBURMANII, OB: OCIMUMBASILICUM, PB: PIPER BETLE, CH: CITRUS HYSTRIX, MA: MASSOIA AROMATICA.
Therefore, higher concentration of antimicrobial compounds needed to be able to penetrate the biofilm’s exopolysaccharide matrix and kill microbial cells inside it. The discovery of new anti-biofilm compounds are indispensable as a therapeutic option for biofilm related infections C.albicans, and currently focused to natural products with anti biofilm activity.
A 1, 8-cineole, main component of eucalyptus oil for instance, showed a high anti biofilm activity against C. albicans biofilm 23. Terpenes, which is the main component of essential oil, known by its antifungal activity. Terpene derivatives such as carvacrol, geraniol and thymol are also known to exhibit potent activity against biofilm 24, 25. C. burmanii essential oil has cinnamaldehyde (44.2%) and eugenol (90.2%) as its main compounds 26. Both cinnamaldehyde and eugenol have antifungal activity against C. albicans 27. According to Narong 28, the main component of P. betle essential oil is eugenol (63.39%) and acetyleugenol (14:05%).
Biofilm associated C. albicans infections were reported by various studies to have tolerance towards the commonly antifungal drugs. Therefore, combination of antifungal agents might be a good strategy to overcome this problem 29. From the result above, combinatorial approach of essential oils against planktonic form of C. albicans was found quite promising. However only limited studies are available on bio-films, and result obtained from studies using planktonic form may not always work in biofilm setup. Biofilm was found more resistant towards essential oils tested compare to the planktonic form. Higher concentration of oils, in single or in combinations, was needed to be able to inhibit the formation of biofilm as well as to disrupt the established biofilm of C. albicans compare to planktonic form. However, in mixture, lower concentration of essential oils might be needed to inhibit and to breakdown C. albicans biofilm as a result of synergistic activity of essential oils mixture.
According to Kon and Rai 30, effects of interactions between essential oils which provide the synergistism activity depends on the interactions of the essential oils components. Essential oils with phenolic compound such as eugenol, possess high antimicrobial activity. Hydroxyl group of eugenol may react with proteins and inhibit enzyme activity. Eugenol also capable to destroy the cytoplasmic membrane, alter membrane fluidity and integrity, which will eventually lead to the cell wall damage and causes the release of intracellular materials 31. Cynnamaldehyde which is a main component in C. burmanii oil, also known to have high antimicrobial activity by inhibiting microbial’s energy metabolism, and interaction with cell membrane leading in disruption of cell membrane and leakage of the cell content. Antifungal activity of cinnamaldehyde is influenced by its ability to inhibit the synthesis of β- (1, 3)-glucan synthase in the cell walls of fungi, which affect the structure of the fungal cell wall 32. Synergy between massoia lactone with cynamaldehyde, citral and geranial may play a key role in the synergism effect between massoia oil, cinnamomum oil, and citrus oil against C. albicans bio-film. Essential oils important characteristics are their hydrophobicity which enable them to breakdown lipid component of fungal membrane, disturbing cell structure resulted in cell death from the leakage of fungal cell 32.
Although Khan and Ahmad 27 have reported that cinnamaldehyde and eugenol, the main component of C. burmanii and P. betle oil have anti biofilm activity, and Dagli et al. 33 also reported that C. burmanii could be used for the treatment of oral candidiasis, the activity of Massoia oil in combination of with other oils tested against C. albicans biofilm has never studied. The effectiveness of essential oils in combinations against C. albicans biofilm is an interesting thing to enhance the role of essential oils as anti biofilm compounds, which can be used in the development of new strategies for treating infectious diseases caused by microbial bio-films.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The authors are gratefully acknowledge the funds support of this research by Faculty of Pharmacy, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. The authors also thankful to Yogaswara Tawang Gumbara and Rahajeng Elok Hapsari for the technical assistance in biofilm assay.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors declare that they are no conflict of interest regarding this manuscript.
REFERENCES:
- Martins N, Ferreira IC, Barros L, Silva S, Henriques M: Candidiasis: predisposing factors, prevention, diagnosis and alternative treatment. Mycopathologia 2014; 177(5-6): 223–240.
- Pierce CG, Chaturvedi AK, Lazzell AL, Powell AT, Saville SP, McHardy SF and Lopez-Ribot JL: A novel small molecule inhibitor ofCandida albicans biofilm formation, filamentation and virulence with low potential for the development of resistance. NPJ Bio-films and Microbiomes 2015; 1: 15012.
- Sardi JCO, Scorzoni L, Bernardi T, Fusco-Almedia AM, Giannini MJSM: Candida species: current epidemiology, pathogenicity, biofilm formation, natural antifungal products and new therapeutic options. Journal of Medical Microbiology 2013; 62: 20-24.
- Vasudevan R: Bio-films: Microbial cities of scientific significance. Journal of Microbiology and Experimentation 2014; 1(3): 00014.
- Nobile CJ and Johnson AD: Candida albicans bio-films and human disease. Annual Review of Microbiology 2015; 69: 71-92.
- Percival SL, Suleman L, Vuotto C, Donelli G: Healthcare-associated infections, medical devices and bio-films: risk, tolerance and control. Journal of Medical Microbiology 2015; 64: 323–334.
- Freires IA, Bueno-Silva B, Galvão LCDC, Duarte MCT, Sartoratto A, Figueira GM, de Alencar SM, and Rosalen PL: The effect of essential oils and bioactive fractions on Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans bio-films: a confocal analysis. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2015; Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2015, Article ID 871316, 9 pages.
- Chandra J, Mukherjee PK, and Ghannoum MA: Candida biofilms associated with CVC and medical devices. Mycoses 2012; 55(s1): 46-57.
- Zahran KM, Agban MN, Ahmed SH, Hassan EA, and Sabet MA: Patterns of Candida biofilm on intrauterine devices. Journal of Medical Microbiology 2015; 64(Pt 4):375-81.
- Pires RH, Montanari LB, Martins CHG, Zaia, JE, Almeida AMF. Matsumoto MT, Mendes-Giannini MJS. Anti-Candida efficacy of cinnamon oil against planktonic and biofilm cultures of Candida parapsilosis and Candida orthopsilosis. Mycopathologia 2011; 172: 453-464.
- Wolska KI, Grześ, and Kurek A: Synergy between novel antimicrobials and conventional antibiotics or bacteriocins. Polish Journal of Microbiology 2012; 61(2): 95-104.
- Pratiwi SUT, Lagendijk EL, de Weert S, Idroes R, Hertiani T, Van Den Hondel C: Effect of Cinnamomum burmanii Nees ex Bl. and Massoia aromatic essential oils on planktonic growth and biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in vitro. International Journal of Applied Research in Natural Products 2015; 8(2): 1-1
- Taff HT, Nett JE and Andes JR: Comparative analysis of Candida biofilm quantitation assays. Medical Mycology 2012; 50 (2): 214-218.
- Deveau A, and Hogan DA: Linking quorum sensing regulation and biofilm formation by Candida albicans, Methods in Molecular Biology 2011; 692:219-233.
- Wu H, Lee B, Yang L, Wang H, Givskov M, Molin S: Effects of ginseng on Pseudomonas aeruginosa motility and biofilm formation. FEMS Immunology Medical Microbiology2011; 62: 49-55.
- Faria NCG, Kim JH, Gonçalves LAP, Martins M de L, Chan KL, Campbell BC: Enhanced activity of antifungal drugs using natural phenolics against yeast strains of Candida and Cryptococcus. Letter Applied Microbiology 2011; 52, 506–513.
- Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI): Performance standards for anti-microbial susceptibility testing: twenty-first informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S21 (ISBN 1-56238-742-1). Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute, Wayne, Pennsylvania USA 2011.
- Yu L, Wei X, Ma M, Chen X, and Xu S: Possible Inhibitory Molecular Mechanism of Farnesol on the Development of Fluconazole Resistance inCandida albicans Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2012; 56(2): 770-775.
- Coffey BM and Anderson GG: Biofilm formation in the 96-well microtiter plate. Methods in Molecular Biology 2014; 1149: 631-641.
- Shapiro BL, Lalitha P, Fothergill AW, Apakupakul K, Srinivasan M, Prajna NV, McLeod SD, Acharya NR, and Lietman TM: Synergy, Indifference, or Antagonism? In Vitro Susceptibility of Fusarium and Aspergillus spp Isolated from Keratitis in South India against Combinations of Natamycin, Voriconazole, and Anidulafungin. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science2011; 52: 5854.
- Dang QL, Shin TS, Park MS, Choi YH, Choi GJ, Jang KS, Kim IS, Kim JC: Antimicrobial Activities of Novel Mannosyl Lipids Isolated from the Bio-control Fungus Simplicillium lamellicola BCP against Phytopathogenic Bacteria. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2014; 62(15): 3363-3370.
- Jigar VD, Mitchell AP, Andes DR: Fungal Bio-films, Drug Resistance, and Recurrent Infections. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2014; 4:a019729, Available online: https://www.medicine.wisc.edu/sites/default/files/fungal_biofilms_drug_resistance_andes.pdfAccess date: 11 August 2016.
- Mathur S, Udgire M, Khambhapati A, and Paul D: Anti biofilm activity and bioactive component analysis of eucalyptus oil against urinary tract pathogen. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science 2014; 3(5): 912-918.
- Gharby A, Humblot V, Turpin F, Pradier CM, Imberd C, Berjeaud JM: Elaboration of anti biofilm surfaces functionalized with antifungal-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes. FEMS Immunology Medical Microbiology 2012; 65(2): 257-269.
- Nostro A, Scaffaro R, D’Arrigo M, Botta M, Filocamo A, Marino A, Bisignano G: Study on carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde polymeric films: mechanical properties, release kinetics and antibacterial and anti biofilmactivities. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2012; 96(4): 1029-1038.
- Chandurkar P, Tripathi N, Choudhary A, and Murab T: Antibacterial properties of cinnamon stick oil with special reference to Streptococcus pyogenes and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science 2014: 3(2): 177-178.
- Khan MS, Ahmad I. Anti biofilmactivity of certain phyto-compounds and their synergy with fluconazole against Candida albicans bio-films. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemoteraphy 2012; 67(3): 618-621.
- Narong S: Hydroxychavicol from Piper betel leave is an antifungal activity against plant pathogenic fungi. Journal of Biopesticides 2015; 8(2): 82-92.
- Shinde RB, Chauhan NM, Raut JS, Karuppayil SM: 2012, Sensitization of Candida albicans bio-films to various antifungal drugs by cyclosporine A. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials 2012; 11:27.
- Kon K, Rai M: Antibacterial activity of Thymus vulgaris essential oil alone and in combination with other essential oils. Biosciences 2012; 4(2): 50-56.
- Du E, Liping G, Wang W, Liu D, Gu Y: In vitro antibacterial activity of thymol and carvacrol and their effects on broiler chickens challenged withClostridium perfringens. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 2015; 6:58.
- Hyldgraad M, Mygind T, Meyer RL: Essential oils in food preservation: mode of action, synergies, and interactions with food matrix components. Frontiers in Microbiology 2012; 3(12): 1-24.
- Dagli M, Dagli R, Mahmoud SR, and Baraodi K: Essential oils, their therapeutic properties, and implication in dentistry: A review. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry 2015; 5(5): 335-340.
How to cite this article:
Pratiwi SUT and Hertiani T: Efficacy of massoia oil in combination with some indonesian medicinal plants oils as anti-biofilm agent towards Candida albicans. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2017; 8(5): 2013-25.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.8(5).2013-25.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
13
2013-2025
1087
1809
English
IJPSR
S. U. T. Pratiwi * and T. Hertiani
Department of Pharmaceutical Biology, Centre for Natural Anti-infective Research (CNAIR), Faculty of Pharmacy, Gadjah Mada University, Sekip Utara, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Sylvia_pratiwi@ugm.ac.id
13 October, 2016
06 December, 2016
16 December, 2016
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.8(5).2013-25
01 May, 2017