EVALUATION OF ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF MYCELIA AND SPOROCARP OF ENTOLOMA SPECULUM
HTML Full TextEVALUATION OF ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF MYCELIA AND SPOROCARP OF ENTOLOMA SPECULUM
J. K. Kodiyalmath* and M. Krishnappa
Department of P.G. Studies and Research in Applied Botany Kuvempu University, Shankaraghatta -577451, Shimoga, Karnataka, India.
ABSTRACT: Antimicrobial activity of mycelia and Sporocarps has been adequately worked out but comparative studies of both has not done in detail. The present work is to compare the antimicrobial activity of mycelia and sporocarps of Entoloma speculum. It is a saprophytic, white fleshy fungi, belongs to Entolomataceae. The collected fruiting bodies were dried, powdered and subjected for secondary metabolites extraction. Mycelia was cultured by loading the spore loading the spore to potato dextrose agar plates. Mass culture of mycelia was done on patato dextrose broth (Shittu 2005) and was extracted by methanol. Both extracts were tested against pathogens, viz., Xanthomonas campestris, Pseudomonas syringae, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Klebsiella pneumonia, Escherihia coli, Salmonella typhi, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans, Trichophyton rubrum, Chrysosporium keratinophilum, Fusarium solani, Penicillium chrysogenum, Aspergillus niger. Mycelial extract inhibited T. rubrum maximum (36 mm), Sporocarp inhibited F. solani at 28mm maximum, the mycelial extract inhibited pathogenic fungi and sporocarps extract inhibited bacterial pathogens.
Keywords: |
Entoloma speculum, Mycelia, Sporocarp, Trichophyton rubrum
INTRODUCTION: Mushroom word is used to define fruiting body of macrofungi. Mainly basidiomycetes but also some species of ascomycetes are sporocarp forming fungi. Wild and cultivated mushrooms contain a huge diversity of biomolecules with nutritional 1. Mushrooms are balanced food stuff that provide definite nutrition and health benefits for human and are appreciated for their taste with pharmacological properties. Natural resources have been exploited in the last years and among them, mushrooms could be an alternative source of new antimicrobials because bioactive compounds associated with mycelia cell wall that help in boosting the immune system 2.
Mushrooms are used as antimicrobial, anticancerous hepatoprotective antitumor, antiviral and anti-allergants 3, 4, 5, 6.
Mushrooms have good flavours and health promoting constituents with vitamins I, which are good alternatives foodstuff with balanced healthy nutrition. Sporocarp and mycelia both are able to produce secondary metabolites 7 and antioxidant Compounds 8. Entoloma nubigenum proved potent antimicrobial mushroom 9. Entoloma lividoalbum contains good antioxidant compounds and also it is antimicrobial in nature 10, 11. Many researchers have carried out on antimicrobial activity of sporocarp. Since last two decades researchers are working on culturing the mushroom mycelium mycelium in large scale for industrially important important components. Therefore the present work deals with comparison the present work deals with comparison of sporocarp and mycelia of Entoloma speculum screened against the pathogenic microorganisms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Entoloma speculum was collected from the Kuvempu University campus during June - Aug 2015. The major field characters were recorded. The sporocarps were brought to laboratory and morphological characters were recorded. The samples were oven dried at 45 - 50 °C for 4 hrs Material was ground to a course powder using mixer. Three hundred grams of the same material was subjected to Soxhlet extraction using 1000 ml of methanol. The extract obtained from E. speculum were dried and kept at for further use.
Mycelial Culture and Extraction: The fresh E. speculum was collected from field, washed with distilled water, kept for spore print under aseptic condition. Petri plates containing subourdous dextrose agar medium was inoculated with spore spore collected from spore print and inoculated for 7 days at ambient temperature. Several times the procedure is repeated to get pure culture thus obtained mycelia was used for further culture 12. From the pure culture, plugs of agar medium (6mm diameter) covered with mycelia, were inoculated to 250 ml conical flask containing 100 ml potato dextrose broth of pH - 5 13, and kept in rotatory shaker at 120 rpm, at 25 oC for 10 days 14. Culture filtrate was filtered by whatman paper no 1, and dried at 80 oC for 30 mins.
Mycelia was weighed before and after drying. Dried mycelia powered 100 gm. was extracted with 150 ml of methanol at 150 rpm and filtered in whatman no1. The residue was then extracted twice with another 150 ml methanol. The total extract was then evaporated to dryness 15. These extracts were screened against pathogenic fungi and bacterial species.
Bacteria: Xanthomonas campestris [MTCC-2286], Pseudomonas syringae [MTCC-1604], Agrobacterium tumefaciens [MTCC-431] Klebsiella pneumonia [MTCC-7028], Escherihia coli [MTCC-1559], Salmonella typhi [MTCC-734], Pseudomonas aeruginosa [MTCC-1934], Staphylococcus aureus [MTCC-902], Streptomyces pneumoneae [MTCC-4734].
Fungi: Candida albicans [MTCC - 1637], Chrysosporium merdarium [MTCC - 4608], Trichophyton rubrum [MTCC - 3272], Chrysosporium keratinophilum [MTCC - 1367], Fusarium solani [MTCC - 1040], Penicillium chrysogenum [MTCC - 947], Aspergillus flavus [MTCC-1783], Aspergillus niger [MTCC-514].
Agar Well Diffusion Method: Antibacterial and Antifungal activity of the mushroom extracts were tested using Agar well diffusion method 16. The test pathogens were maintained on separate nutrient plates. Wells were made with 6mm cork borer. The wells were loaded with extracts which were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) of different concentration (100%, 50%, and 25%) using micro pipette.
Amoxycillin for bacteria, Terbinafine for fungi were used as standard and DMSO was used as control for test microorganisms. The plates were incubated at 27±2 °C for 24 h for bacteria and 4 days for fungal activity. The zone formation was observed in plates around the wells. The zone of inhibition was calculated by measuring the diameter of the inhibition zone around. The reading also includes the well diameter. The readings were taken in 4 replicates, data obtained were analysed using Microsoft Excel software and expressed in terms of Mean ± standard deviation (SD).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Phytochemical tests of sporocarp and mycelial extracts both showed the presence of phenols, steroids, terpenoids and alkaloids in qualitative chemical screening. Methanol extracts of mushroom and mycelia showed maximum inhibition of test organism. In the present study the antimicrobial activity of mycelia and sporocarps of E. speculum is studied, fruiting bodies and mycelia showed significant activity against test organisms. Mycelia inhibited T. rubrum maximum (36mm), mushroom inhibited F. solani (28mm) maximum, whereas mushroom extract least inhibited T. rubrum (13mm). C. keratinophilum and P. chrysogenum were inhibited by mycelial extract equaly with (29mm) but P. chrysogenum was inhibited with 27mm by mushroom extract. F. solani and A. niger was inhibited with 30mm inhibition zone by mycelial extract. A. tumefaciens inhibited by mycelia extract with 32mm zone.
Mushroom extract showed 26mm inhibition zone against A niger. 25% concentration of mushroom extract did not show any activity on C. keratinophilum, but all the three concentration (100% 50% 25%) of mycelia showed inhibition on C. keratinophilum range from 29 - 24 mm. whereas P. chrysogenum was inhibited by mycelia and mushroom extract both. C. albicans was significantly inhibited by mycelium but moderately inhibited by mushroom.
TABLE 1: ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY OF MYCELIAL AND SPOROCARP EXTRACT OF ENTOLOMA SPECULUM IN DIFFERENT CONCENTRATION
Organisms |
Mycelial extract in different
concentration in mm |
Mushroom extract in different concentration in mm | Standard
Terbinafine |
||||
100 % conc | 50 % conc | 25 % conc | 100 % conc | 50 % conc | 25 % conc | ||
Ca | 31±1 | 28.33±1.52 | 25.66±1.15 | 20±1 | 15±1 | 12±1 | 24.66±0.57 |
Cm | 34±2 | 29±1 | 25±1 | 21±1 | 17.33±1.15 | 14±1 | 30±1 |
Tr | 36.66±1.52 | 31±3.6 | 26.33±1.52 | 13±1 | 11±1 | 8.33±0.57 | 24±1 |
Ck | 29.33±1.15 | 27±1 | 24.66±1.52 | 19.33±1.52 | 10.66±1.15 | 0±0 | 29±1 |
Fs | 30.66±1.15 | 27±1.73 | 21.33±1.52 | 28.33±1.52 | 18±1 | 13±1 | 29±1 |
Pc | 29.33±1.52 | 24.66±0.57 | 21.33±1.52 | 27±1 | 21±1.73 | 18.33±0.57 | 19.66±0.57 |
Af | 32±2 | 27.66±0.57 | 25.33±1.52 | 25.33±1.52 | 22.33±2.08 | 15.33±1.52 | 24±1 |
An | 30.66±1.15 | 27.33±1.15 | 23.66±1.52 | 26.66±1.52 | 21.66±2.08 | 14±1 | 20.33±1.52 |
Candida albicans=Ca, Chrysosporium merdarium=Cm, Trichophyton rubrum=Tr, Chrysosporium keratinophilum=Ck, Fusarium solani=Fs, Penicillium chrysogenum=Pc, Aspergillus flavus=Af and Aspergillus niger=An
Pathogenic bacteria were inhibited by Sporocarp extract than the mycelia. Sporocarp suppressed the growth of all bacterial pathogens. X campestris was susceptible to mycelial extract greater than the standard amoxycilin. E. coli inhibited with 28 mm zone while K. pneumonia and P. aeruginosa inhibited with 26 mm zone. S aureus was least inhibited with 19 mm. S typhi showed 23 mm inhibition by mycelia extract but mushroom extracts inhibited S. typhi by 29 mm greater than standard (25 mm). P. aeruginosa showed 37 mm zone highest of all the other organisms. Mushroom extract inhibited X. campestris equal to standard (33.66), but A. tumefaciens inhibition was equal to standard: Table 2.
TABLE 2: ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF MYCELIAL AND SPOROCARP EXTRACT OF ENTOLOMA SPECULUM IN DIFFERENT CONCENTRATION
Organisms |
Mycelial extract in different
concentration in mm |
Mushroom extract in different concentration in mm | Standard
Amoxycilin |
||||
100% conc | 50 % conc | 25 % conc | 100% conc | 50 % conc | 25 % conc | ||
Kp | 26.66±1.52 | 20.66±5.13 | 17.66±6.8 | 36±1 | 28.33±1.52 | 26±1 | 28±1 |
St | 23.33±2.88 | 21.66±3.21 | 19.33±3.05 | 29±1 | 17±0.7 | 21.33±1.52 | 25±1 |
Sa | 19.66±1.52 | 16.33±1.52 | 10.66±1.15 | 35±1 | 30±1 | 23.33±2.08 | 28.33±1.52 |
Pa | 26.33±1.15 | 15±2 | 10.33±0.57 | 37±1 | 29.66±1.52 | 24.66±0.57 | 28±1 |
At | 33.33±1.15 | 30.33±0.57 | 26±1 | 33.66±1.52 | 28.66±1.52 | 25.33±1.52 | 33.66±2.51 |
Ps | 21±3.6 | 18.66±4.04 | 16.33±4.5 | 30±1 | 24.66±0.57 | 19±1 | 24±1 |
Xc | 31.33±1.15 | 28.33±2.88 | 24.66±4.16 | 34±1 | 28±1 | 26±1 | 25±1 |
Ec | 28.66±1.52 | 21.66±2.08 | 13.66±1.15 | 33.66±1.52 | 28.66±1.52 | 25.33±1.52 | 22.66±1.52 |
Klebsiella pneumonia = Kp, Salmonella typhi=St, Staphylococcus aureus =Sa, Pseudomonas aeruginosa= Pa, Agrobacterium tumefaciens=At, Pseudomonas syringae=Ps, Xanthomonas campestris=Xc and Escherihia coli=Ec
Mushroom inhibited bacteria greater than fungi, this is in agreement with the result of Jonathan 18. Mycelia inhibited fungi greater than bacteria, this is in favourable with Osman and Kalyoncu 15, 19. Pranita 20, investigated the antimicrobial activity of Trametes versicolar, against P. aeruginosa is 20mm inhibition zone, S. aureus 20 mm Peniillium sp. 12 mm A. flavus 13 m, A. niger 14 mm, E. coli 18mm, in present study the methanol extract of E.
speculum inhibited A flavus at 32 mm, A. niger 30 mm, S. aureus 19 mm, P aeruginosa 26 mm, higher than Trametes versiolar, Omar 21 revealed that mycelia of Lentinus squarrosulus possess the antioxidant activity and antitumor potential. Cho 22 investigated hypoglycaemic of exopolysaccharides from mycelial culture of Tremella fuciformis and Phellinus boumni found excellent activity on mice.
Hatvani 23 investigated the antibacterial effect of culture fluid of Lentinus edodes mycelium showed poor activity against S. aureus and S. pyogens and Candida albicans E. coli and K. pneumonia, but in present study mycelium extract inhibited E. coli, K. pneumonia, C. Albicans and S. aureus significantly. Manjunathan 24 worked on the antimicrobial activity of Lentinus tuberregium mycelium extracts on S aureus (9 mm) P aeruginosa (8 mm) E. coli (11 mm) S. typhi (12 mm) C. albicans (10 mm). Rai 25 investigated the antimicrobial effect of the extract of Entoloma lividoalbum fruiting body against C. albicans which exhibited complete resistant, and E. coli showed 10 mm and P. aeruginosa 8mm inhibition zone, but E. speculum fruiting body and mycelia both inhibited pathogens significantly Table 1 and 2. Ishikawa 26 studies on antimicrobial activity of Lentinula edodes mycelium extract K. pneumonia showed 4 mm and P. aeruginosa 0 mm and S. aureus 13 mm inhibition zone in disc diffusion method.
In the present investigation the maximum antifungal activity is showed by mycelia and maximum antibacterial activity shown by sporocarp.
FIG. 1: ANTIFUNGAL ACTIVITY OF MYCELIA AND MUSHROOM EXTRACT OF ENTOLOMA SPECULUM
Candida albicans=Ca, Chrysosporium merdarium=Cm, Trichophyton rubrum=Tr, Chrysosporium keratinophilum=Ck, Fusarium solani=Fs, Penicillium chrysogenum=Pc, Aspergillus flavus=Af, Aspergillus niger=An
FIG. 2: ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF MYCELIA AND MUSHROOM EXTRACT OF ENTOLOMA SPECULUM
Klebsiella pneumonia = Kp, Salmonella typhi=St, Staphylococcus aureus=Sa, Pseudomonas aeruginosa=Pa, Agrobacterium tumefaciens=At, Pseudomonas syringae=Ps, Xanthomonas campestris=Xc and Escherihia coli=Ec
CONCLUSION: Mushroom are seasonal and limited. As they are rich in metabolites we can get them by culturing their mycelia in large scale and extract the metabolites from mycelia and also By culture filtrate without disturbing the environment by harvesting mushroom in large scale from nature.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The authors are grateful to Chairman Department of Applied Botany Shankaraghatta for providing lab facilities. They are also indebted to Dr. Syed Abrar, Guest Lecturer Department of Applied Botany, Kuvempu University for identification of the species. We are also thankful to Nandan Patel K. J., Research Scholar, Department of applied Botany, Kuvempu University notably for his help and support.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Nil
REFERENCES:
- Kalac P, Chemical Composition and Nutritional Value of European Species of Wild Rowing Mushroom; A Review. Food Chem. 2009; 113: 9-16.
- Ramesh, C. and Pattar M. G., Antimicrobial Properties, Antioxidant Activity and Bioactive Compounds from Six Wild Edible Mushrooms of Western Ghats of Karnataka, India. Pharmacognosy Res. 2010; 2: 107–112.
- Wissitrassameewong K, karunarathan S C, Thongklang N, Zhao R, Callac P, Moukha S, et al., Agaricus subrufesens: A Review, Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2012; 19:131-146.
- Khatun S, Islam A, Cakil Cioglu U and Chatterjee N C, Research on Mushroom as a Potential Source of Nutraceuticals: A Review on Indian Prespective. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture 2012; 2: 47-73.
- Patel S and Goyal A. Recent Developments in Mushrooms as Anti-Cancer Therapeutics; A Review Biotech. 2012; 2:1-15.
- Thatoi H. and Singdevsachan S.K. Diversity, nutritional composition and medicinal potential of Indian mushroom: A review. African Journal of Biotechnology 2014; 13: 523-545.
- Yamac M, Bilgili F. Antimicrobial activities of fruit bodies and/ or mycelial cultures of some mushroom isolates. Pharmaceutical Biology. 2006; 44:660-667.
- Rajoriya A and Gupta N Proximate and Antioxidant Activity of Mycelia of Termitomyces microcarpus and Amanita loosii, Agricultural Research & Technology, 2015; 1: 2-4.
- Reinoso R, Madriaga D C, Martinez M, Martin A. S, Perez C, Fajardo V and Jose Becerra J. Biological Activity of Macromycetes Isolated from Chilean Sub Antarctic Ecosystems. Journalof the Chilean Chemical Society. 2013; 58: 2016-2018.
- Rai M, Sen S and Acharya K, Antimicrobial Activity of Four Wild Edible Mushroom from Darjeeling Hills, West Bengal, India, International Journal of Pharm Tech Research, 2013; 5: 949-956.
- Dasgupta A, Rai M, Acharya K, Phytochemical Analysis and in vitro Antioxidant activity of a wild edible mushroom Entoloma lividoalbum. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 2015; 8: 171-174.
- Shittu O B, Alofe F V, Onawunmi G O, Ogundaini A O, and Tiwalade T A. Mycelial Growth and Antibacterial Metabolite Production by Wild Mushroom. Asian journal of medical research. 2005; 8: 157-162.
- Jeong, Sang-Chul, Sung-Pill Cho, Byung-Keun Yang, Yong-Tae Jeong, Kyun-Soo Ra, and Chi-Hyun Song. Immunomodulating Activity of the Exopolimer from Submerged Mycelial Culture of Phellinus pini. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2004; 14: 15-21.
- Owaid M.N., Salem S.S., Al-Saeedi and Al-Assaffii I.A.A. Antimicrobial activity of mycelia of oyster mushroom species (Pleurotus ) and their liquid filtrates (in vitro). Journal of Medical and Bioengineering, 2015 4: 376-380.
- Kalyoncu F, Oskay M, Kayaalar H. Antioxidant Activity of the Mycelium of 21 Wild Mushroom Species. Mycology. 2010; 1: 195-199.
- Balauiri M., Sadiki M. and Ibnsouda S.K. Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 2016. 6: 71-79.
- Das K, Tiwari RKS, Shrivastava DK. Techniques for evaluation of medicinal plants products as Antimicrobial Agents: Current Methods and Recent Trends. Journalof Medicinal Plants Research. 2010; 4:104-111.
- Jonathan SG, Fasidi IO. Antimicrobial activity of two Nigerian edible macrofungi-Lycoperdon pusilum (Bat. Ex) and Lyocoperdon giganteum (Pers.) African Journal of biomedical Research, 2003; 6:85-90.
- Osman M, Hassan F.R.H., Ahmed W.A., Nady S, El-sayed H. Growth and Antimicrobial Activity of Different Mushroom Strains Grown in Submerged Culture Journal of Chemical, Biological and Physical Sciences . 2015; 5:545-564.
- Pranitha V, Krishna G and Charya M.A S. Evaluation of Antibacterial and Anifungal Activity of Fruiting Body Extracts of Trametes versicolar, 2014; 2:1181-1184.
- Omar N A M, Abdullah N, Kuppusamy U R, Abdulla M A, and Vikineswary Sabaratnam V. Nutrional Composition, Antioxidants Activities, and Antiulcer Potential of Lentinus squarrosulus (Mont.) Mycelia Extract. Journal ofEvidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2011; 1-8.
- Cho E J , Hwang H J, Kim S W & Oh J Y, Baek Y M and Choi J W et al., Hypoglycemic Effects of Exopolysaccharides Produced by Mycelial Cultures of Two Different Mushrooms Tremella fuciformis and Phellinus baumii in Ob/Ob Mice, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2007; 75:1257–1265
- Hatvani N, Antibacterial Effect of the Culture Fluid of Lentinus edodes Mycelium Grown in Submerged Liquid Culture, International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2001; 17: 71-74.
- Manjunathan J. And Kaviyarasan V, Optimization of Mycelia Growth and Antimicrobial Activity of New Edible Mushroom, Lentinus tuberregium (Fr.). Tamil Nadu., India, International Journal of Pharm Tech Research. 2011; 3: 497-504,
- Rai M., Sen S. and Acharya K. Antimicrobial activity of four wild edible mushrooms from Darjeeling hills, West Bengal, India. International Journal of Pharmtech Research, 2013; 5: 949-956.
- Ishikawa N K, Kasuya M C M, Vanetti M C D, Antibacterial Activity of Lentinula edodes Grown in Liquid Medium, Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 2001; 32: 206-210.
How to cite this article:
Kodiyalmath JK and Krishnappa M: Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of mycelia and sporocarp of Entoloma speculum. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2018; 9(3): 1237-41.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(3).1237-41.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
48
1237-1241
332
1070
English
IJPSR
J. K. Kodiyalmath* and M. Krishnappa
Department of P.G. Studies and Research in Applied Botany Kuvempu University, Shankaraghatta, Shimoga, Karnataka, India.
jk.kodiyalmath@gmail.com
07 June, 2017
26 August, 2017
29 August, 2017
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(3).1237-41
01 March, 2018