EVALUATION OF ANTIULCER ACTIVITY OF CALOTROPIS GIGANTEA R.Br LEAVES
HTML Full TextEVALUATION OF ANTIULCER ACTIVITY OF CALOTROPIS GIGANTEA R.Br LEAVES
P. Swapna*2, Stellaa Robertson 1 A. Elumalai 2, M. Chinna Eswaraiah 2 and K. Nirmala 2
Department of Pharmacognosy, SRM College of Pharmacy 1, Kattankulathur, Kanchipuram (Dt)- 603 203, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Department of Pharmacognosy, Anurag Pharmacy College 2, Ananthagiri (v), Kodad(M), Nalgonda (Dt)- 508 206, Andhra Pradesh, India
ABSTRACT
The antiulcer activity of ethanolic extract of Calotropis gigantea R.Br leaves (EECG) was investigated in pylorus ligation and ethanol induced ulcer models in experimental rats. In both models the common parameter determined was ulcer index. Ethanolic extract of Calotropis gigantea at a dose of 150 and 300mg/kg produced significant inhibition of the gastric lesions induced by pylorus ligation induced ulcer and ethanol induced gastric ulcer. The extract (150mg/kg and 300mg/kg) showed significant (p<0.05) reduction in gastric volume, free acidity and ulcer index as compared to control. This present study indicates that EECG have potential anti-ulcer activity in both models. These results may further suggest that the extract was found to possess antiulcerogenic as well as ulcer healing properties, which might be due to its antisecretory activity.
Keywords:Ethanolic extract,
Calotropis gigantea, Pylorus ligation, Ethanol induced ulcer model, Ulcer index, |
Omeprazole
INTRODUCTION: Peptic ulcer is one of the most common gastrointestinal diseases 1. The exact causes of peptic ulcer disease are not known but it may result from an imbalance between acid-pepsin secretions and mucosal defense factors 2. Peptic ulcer disease occurs mainly due to consumption of NSAIDS, infection by H.pylori, stress or due to pathological condition such as Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome 3.
Calotropis gigantea is commonly known as ‘madar’ in Hindi, belonging to the family Asclepiadaceae, is a milky shrub up to 1-3m in height found through out India 4, 5. On phytochemical investigation researcher claimed that leaves of Calotropis gigantea found to contain a resin-mudarine, glycosides viz., calotropin, uscharin and calotoxin 6.
The leaf has been found to show anti microbial activity 7, nematicidal activity 8, wound healing activity 9, anti-inflammatory activity 10, anti-diarrheal activity 11, hepatoprotective activity 12, antipyretic activity 13, anti-arthritic activity 14, hypoglycemic activity 15, anti-Candida activity 16.
So for no systematic study has been reported for antiulcer properties of Calotropis gigantea leaf extracts. In the present study effort has been made to establish the scientific validity to the anti ulcer property of Calotropis gigantea leaves extracts using pyloric ligation and ethanol induced ulceration models in albino rats.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Plant materials: The leaves of Calotropis gigantea were collected in and around the kundrathur hill, Anakaputur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu in the month of November, 2010. The specimen was identified and authenticated by Prof. Dr. P. Jayaraman, Director, Plant Anatomy Research Center (PARC), Tambaram, Chennai.
The specimen was deposited to herbarium of SRM College of Pharmacy. The voucher specimen no was (PARC/2010/598). After authentication, fresh leaves collected in bulk from plants, washed, shade dried and then milled to a coarse powder by a mechanical grinder,
Preparation of extract: The powders of dried leaves were packed in to soxhlet column and extract with ethanol. The extract was filter through a Whatmann filter paper no.1 and concentrated under reduced pressure (yield of extract was 9.40% with respect to dry material). Just prior to use, the substance was dissolved in physiological saline solution.
Animals: The study was conducted on male Wister rats (175-200gm) housed in polypropylene cages under standard conditions of temperature (22 ± 2°C) relative humidity (60 ± 5%) and light (12h light/dark cycle) were used. They were fed with standard diet and water. The food was withdrawn 18 hours before the experiment but allowed free access of water. All animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the guidelines of CPCSEA.
Acute Oral Toxicity Studies: Acute toxicity was carried out according to Organization of Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) guidelines17, No mortality was observed and all the test doses were found to be safe.
Pyloric ligation in rats: The animals were divided into 5 groups, each consisting of six rats. Control group received distilled water only. Second group of rats are pyloric ligated. Third and fourth groups received EECG in a dose of 150 and 300 mg/kg. The fifth group of animals received Omeprazole in the dose of 20mg/kg as a reference drug for ulcer protective studies. After 45 min of the treatment, pyloric ligation was done by ligating the pyloric end of stomach of rats of respective groups under ether anesthesia at a dose of 35mg/kg of body weight.
Ligation was done without causing any damage to the blood supply of the stomach. Animals were allowed to recover and stabilize in individual cages and were deprived of water during post-operative period. Rats were sacrificed after 4hr of surgery and ulcer scoring was done.
Gastric juice was collected and gastric secretion studies were performed according to the standard procedure 18.
Ethanol induced Ulcer Model: The ulcer was induced by administering absolute ethanol (1ml/200g). All the animals were fasted for 36 hours and then ethanol was administered to induce ulcer. The animals were divided into five groups, each consisting of six rats. The control group received distilled water, second group received ethanol. Third and fourth groups received EECG in a dose of 150 and 300 mg/kg. The fifth group of animals received Omeprazole in the dose of 20 mg/kg as a reference drug. They were kept in specially constructed cages to prevent coprophagia during and after the experiment. The animals were anaesthetized 1 hr later with anaesthetic ether and stomach was incised along the greater curvature and ulceration was scored. A score for the ulcer was studied to pyloric ligation induced ulcer model19.
Scoring of ulcers:
Normal stomach : -0
Red coloration : -0.5
Spot ulcer : -1
Hemorrhagic streak : -1.5
Ulcers (< 2mm) : -2
Ulcers (>2 < 4 mm) perforation : -3
Ulcers (< 4mm) : -4
Mean ulcer score for each animal was expressed as ulcer index. The percentage of ulcer protection was determined by;
% of ulcer protection =
Control mean ulcer index – Test mean ulcer index
----------------------------------------------------------------------X 100
Control mean ulcer index
Determination of free acidity:
Volume of sodium hydroxide x Normality x 100mEq/L/100g
Acidity = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.1
Statistical analysis: The values are represented as mean ± S.E.M, and Statistical significance between treated and control groups was analyzed using of one way ANOVA, followed by Dennett’s test where P<0.05 was considered statically significant.
RESULTS:
Pyloric Ligation induced Gastric Ulcer: In pyloric ligation induced ulcer model, oral administration of EECG in two different doses showed significant reduction in ulcer index, gastric volume, free acidity, total acidity compared to the central group. EECG exhibited a protection index of 68.7% and 81.2% at the dose of 150 and 300 mg/kg respectively, where as Omeprazole as reference standard exhibited a protection index of 85.2% (Table 1).
Ethanol-induced Gastric Ulcer: In control animal, oral administration of absolute ethanol produced characteristic lesions in the glandular portion of rat stomach which appeared as elongated bands of thick, blackish red lesions. EECG has shown significant protection index of 67.7% and 71.2% with the dose of 150 and 300 mg/kg respectively whereas Omeprazole as reference standard showed protection index of 79.6% (Table 2).
TABLE 1: EFFECT OF EECG ON VARIOUS PARAMETERS IN PYLORIC LIGATION INDUCED GASTRIC ULCERS
Group | Treatment | Ulcer index | Free acidity meq/ltr | PH of gastric juice | Gastric juice | Total acidity meq/ltr | Protection (%) |
I | Normal (distilled water) | --- | 41.3 ± 0.3 | 5.41 ± 0.3 | 3.8 ± 0.4 | 62.3 ± 0.2 | --- |
II | Control (pyloric ligation) | 14.2 ± 1.2 | 95.6 ± 1.4 | 2.51 ± 0.2 | 8.2 ± 0.2 | 112.5 ± 0.2 | --- |
III | EECG (150mg/kg) | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 43.7 ± 0.3 | 4.87 ± 0.2* | 5.3 ±1.2 | 75.3 ± 0.4 | 68.7 % |
IV | EECG (300mg/kg) | 2.8 ± 0.4* | 39.8 ± 0.2* | 5.51 ± 0.4* | 4.2±0.4* | 61.7 ± 0.6* | 81.2% |
V | Omeprazole (20mg/kg) | 2.2 ± 0.5* | 37.4 ± 0.2* | 5.71 ± 0.4* | 3.9 ± 0.2* | 60.1 ± 1.4* | 85.2% |
TABLE 2: EFFECT OF EECG ON VARIOUS PARAMETERS IN ETHANOL INDUCED GASTRIC ULCERS
Group | Treatment | Ulcer index | PH of gastric juice | Protection (%) |
I | Normal (distilled water) | --- | 5.42 ± 0.3 | --- |
II | Control (pyloric ligation) | 12.3 ± 0.2 | 2,83 ± 0.6 | --- |
III | EECG (150mg/kg) | 4,3 ± 0.5 | 3.68 ± 0.6 | 67.7% |
IV | EECG (300mg/kg) | 3.6 ± 0.4* | 4.86 ± 0.7* | 71.2% |
V | Omeprazole (20mg/kg) | 2.7 ± 0.4* | 5.62 ± 0.7* | 79.6% |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of observations, Statistical comparisons as follows: Significant *P <0.005 compared to control group
DISCUSSION: The etiology of peptic ulcer is unknown in most of the cases, it is generally accepted that gastric ulcer results from an imbalance between aggressive factors and the maintenance of the mucosal integrity through the endogenous defense mechanism 20. Different therapeutic agents are used to inhibit the gastric acid secretion or to boost the mucosal defense mechanisms by increasing mucosal production, stabilizing the surface epithelial cells or interfering with the prostaglandin synthesis 21. The prostaglandins can provide gastric cytoprotection in rats against strong necrotizing irritants without reducing gastric acid secretion 22.
The causes of gastric ulcer by pyloric ligation are believed to be due to stress induced increase in gastric hydrochloric acid secretion and/or stasis of acid and the volume of secretion is also an important factor in the formation of ulcer due to exposure of the unprotected lumen of the stomach to the accumulating of acid.
The ligation of the pyloric end of the stomach causes accumulation of gastric acid in the stomach. This increase in the gastric acid secretion causes ulcers in the stomach. The lesions produced by this method are located in the lumen region of the stomach 23.
Ethanol induced gastric lesion formation may be due to stasis in gastric blood flow which contributes to the development of the haemorrhage and narcotic aspects of tissue injury 24. Alcohol rapidly penetrates the gastric mucosa apparently causing cell and plasma membrane damage leading to increased intra cellular membrane permeability to sodium and water. The massive intracellular accumulation of calcium represents a major step in the pathogenesis of gastric mucosal injury. This leads to cell death and exfoliation in the surface epithelium 25.
In the present study, EECG showed protection against gastric lesions in the experimental rats, reduced gastric volume, free acidity, total acidity and ulcer index thus showing the anti-secretory mechanism involved in the extracts for their anti-ulcerogenic activity. Ulcer index parameter was used for the evaluation of anti ulcer activity since ulcer formation is directly related to factors such as gastric volume, free and total acidity26.
The protection of EECG against characteristic lesions may be due to both reductions in gastric acid secretion and gastric cycloprotein or enhancement of the mucosal barrier through the increase production of prostaglandin and this may be due to the presence of glycosides. Further studies are needed for their exact mechanism of action on gastric acid secretion and gastric cytoprotection.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The authors express their gratitude to Mrs. Susela Janarthan and Mrs. Chandramathi Arunachalam, for providing necessary facilities.
REFERENCES:
- P.C. Dandiya, S.K. Kulkarni: Introduction to Pharmacology. Vallabh Prakashan, New Delhi, 2005: 247
- Padmaja Uday kumar: Textbook of medical Pharmacology. CBS publishers, New Delhi, 2005: 317.
- Mohammed A., Ravi Kumar J., Santosh H.Y and Nagashruthi M.H: Antiulcer activity of anisochilus carnosus leaf extracts in pylorus ligation rats. Indian Drugs 2008; 45 (12): 979.
- Kirtikar KR and Basu BD: Indian Medicinal Plants. International Book Distributors and Publishers, Dehradun, India, Edition 2, Vol. 1, 2008: 1607-1609.
- Nadkarni KM and Nadkarni AK: Indian Materia Medica. Popular Prakashan Pvt. Ltd, Edition 3, Vol. 1, 1976: 237-241.
- Chaudhuri RHN: Pharmacognostic studies on the roots of Calotropis gigantea R.Br.ex Ait. Bull Bot Surv India 1961; 3: 171-173.
- Bambawale OM, Mohan P and Chakraborty M: Efficacy of some medicinal plants against cotton pathogens. Adv Plant Sci 1995; 8: 224-229.
- Chattopadhyay RR: Nematicidal properties of some plant infested with Meloigyne incognita. Geobios 1991; 18: 232-236.
- Deshmukh PT, Fernandes J and Atul A: Wound healing activity of Calotropis gigantea root bark in rats. J Ethnopharmacol 2009; 17, 125 (1): 178-81.
- Adak M and Gupta JK: Evaluation of anti-inflammatory activity of Calotropis gigantea in various biological systems. Nepal Med Coll J 2006; 8(3): 156- 61.
- Chitme HR, Chandra M, and Kaushik S: Anti-diarrhoeal activity of Calotropis gigantea R.Br.in experimental animals. J Pharm Sci 2004; 7(1): 70-5.
- Lodhi G, Singh HK, Pant KK and Hussain Z: Hepatoprotective effects of Calotropis gigantea extract against carbon tetrachloride induced liver injury in rats. Acta Pharm 2009; 59(1): 89-96.
- Chitme HR, Chandra R, Kaushik S: Evaluation of antipyretic activity of Calotropis gigantea (Asclepiadaceae) in experimental animals. Phyto ther Res 2005; 19(5): 454-456.
- Patil KS, Mamatha GC and Chaturvedi SC: Anti-arthritic activity of leaves of Calotropis gigantea Linn. Journal of Natural Remedies 2007; 7(2): 189 – 194.
- Rathod NR, Chitme HR, Irchhaiya R and Chandra R: Hypoglycemic Effect of Calotropis gigantea Linn. Leaves and Flowers in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats. Oman Med J 2011; 26(2): 104-108.
- Gaurav Kumar, Loganathan Karthik and Kokati Venkata Bhaskara Rao: In vitro anti-candida activity of Calotropis gigantea. Journal of Pharmacy research 2010; 3(3): 539-542.
- Ecobion DJ: The basis of toxicity testing. CRS Press New York, 1997: 43-49.
- Shay H, Komarav SA, Fele SS, Merarnze D, Gruenstin H and Siplet H: A simple method for uniform production of gastric ulceration in rats: Gastroenterol 1945; 5: 43-61.
- Mahmod AA: Int J Mol Adv Sci 2005; 1: 225.
- Hikino H: Recent research on oriental medicinal plants in economic and medicinal plants, Academic press London, 1985; 53.
- Tan PV, Dimo T and Dongo E: Effects of methanol cyclohexane and methylene chloride extracts of Bidens pilosa on various gastric ulcer models in rats. J.ethanopharmacol 2000; 73: 415-421.
- Yamamoto K, kakegawa H, Matsumto H, Sudo T and Satoh T: Gastric cytoprotective antiulcerogenications of hydroxychalcones in rats, Planta medica 1992; 58: 389-393.
- Dhuley JN: Protective effect of Rhinax a herbal formulation against physical and chemical factors induced gastric and duodenal ulcers in rats, Indian J Pharmacol 1999; 31: 128-132.
- Soll AH: Pathogenesis of peptic ulcers and implications for therapy, New Eng J Med 1990; 322: 909-16.
- Surendra S Evaluation of gastric anti ulcer activity of Fixed oil of tulsi and possible mechanism, Indian J Exp Biol 1999; 36 (3): 253-257.
- Goel RK and Bhattacharya SK: Gastro duodenal mucosal defence and mucosal protective agents, Indian J Exp Biol 1991; 29: 701-714.
Article Information
33
2938-2941
485
1397
English
Ijpsr
P. Swapna*, Stellaa Robertson A. Elumalai , M. Chinna Eswaraiah and K. Nirmala
Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacognosy, Anurag Pharmacy College 2, Ananthagiri (v), Kodad(M), Nalgonda (Dt)- 508 206, Andhra Pradesh, India
16 July, 2011
08 August, 2011
19 October, 2011
http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.2(11).2938-41
01 November, 2011