EVALUATION OF PHYTOCHEMICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF EPIPHYTIC ORCHID LUISIA ZEYLANICA LINDL.
HTML Full TextEVALUATION OF PHYTOCHEMICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF EPIPHYTIC ORCHID LUISIA ZEYLANICA LINDL.
Jhansi Katta 1, Venkatesh Rampilla * 2 and Khasim Shaik Mohamad 1
Department of Botany and Microbiology 1, Acharya Nagarjuna University, Nagarjuna Nagar, Guntur - 522510, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Dr. L. H. R. Government Degree College 2, Mylavaram, Krishna - 521230, Andhra Pradesh, India.
ABSTRACT: The present study was carried out to evaluate phytochemical composition and pharmacological activities of leaf extract of Lusia zeylanica by using different solvents. The solvents like n-hexane, ethyl acetate and methanolic were used to extract dried leaf material of L. zeylanica. These extracts were analyzed for phytochemical constituents with GC-MS analysis and antimicrobial activity tested against four bacterial strains and three fungal strains by using the agar diffusion method. In-vitro anticancer activity was done against two cancer cell lines (MCF-7 and HeLa cell line) by using MTT assay. Phytochemical analysis revealed the presence of coumarins, flavonoids, glycosides, phenols, saponins, tannins, and terpenoids. GC-MS analysis determines the presence of 11 compounds in ethyl acetate, 7 compounds in methanolic extracts and a total of 7 unknown compounds respectively. A significant cancer cell growth inhibition was observed for two extracts with IC50 values ranging between 18.36 µg/ml to 67.914 µg/ml. Our result shows this plant is a promising source of phytocompounds with potential antimicrobial and anticancer activity.
Keywords: |
GC-MS analysis, Antimicrobial, Anticancer, Lusia zeylanica
INTRODUCTION: In developing countries, infectious diseases are a major threat to public health. In India large number of people still rely on ethnomedicine to treat serious diseases including cancer and different types of inflammations. Contrary to synthetic drugs ethnomedicinal plants are used to cure various infectious diseases. Many drugs obtained from plant origin have no side effects and have enormous therapeutic potential to treat infectious diseases 1.
World Health Organization has also recognized the importance of ethnomedicine/ traditional medicine in the healthcare sector.
Recent ethnomedicinal, pharmacological studies on orchids indicate that these plants have immense potential on the treatment of various diseases such as neurodegenerative disorders, anticonvulsive, anti-cancer, antidiabetic etc. 2, 3 Orchids are one of ethnobotanical interest linking aboriginal man with plants for medicine 4. Numerous orchid species possessing cultural values have been used in herbal medicines and also food supplements by the tribal people across the world 5. Though there has been tremendous progress in medicinal plant research, orchids have not been exploited fully for their medicinal application. Orchid extracts and purified compounds are shown to exhibit several bio-activities such as antimicrobial, antioxidant, anthelmintic, insecticidal, antiviral, analgesic, antipyretic, antiallergic, wound inflammatory activity 6.
Luisia zeylanica is a widely distributed epiphytic orchid found in Eastern Ghats of Visakhapatnam district. It is one such plant showing multifarious Ethnomedicinal properties such as Abscesses, emollient, chronic boils, burns, fractures and tumors 3, 7. The knowledge of medicinal plant's active chemical constituents would be further valuable in discovering the actual value of ethnomedicine. Hence, scientific validation of ethnomedicinal plants provides evidence-based alternative medicines, which form the basis of the discovery of new drugs.
Antioxidant and phytochemical analysis of L. zeylanica leaf extracts showing the presence of various bioactive compounds 8. To validate the ethnomedicinal properties of L. zeylanica, the present study was attempted to evaluate the phytochemical composition, antimicrobial and anticancer activities by using various solvent extracts of leaf material.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the present study ethnomedicinal orchid L. zeylanica with voucher number ANUBH01210 is collected from Paderu, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh. Fresh healthy leaves were collected and thoroughly washed with distilled water to remove dust particles and shade dried at room temperature for ten days. The dried material was made into coarse powder by means of an electrical grinder. The dried powdered leaf material of (200 g) was Soxhlet extracted with n-hexane, ethyl acetate and methanolic solvents for about 12-15 h. The crude extracts of different solvents were evaporated by a vacuum rotary evaporator (Buchi Labortech Ag, model l, R-215) under reduced pressure. The various solvent extracts were filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure in a rotary evaporator. The dried extracts were kept in the refrigerator at 4 °C until use.
Preliminary Phytochemical Screening: The dried extract of various solvents hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate and methanolic were preliminarily screened by using standard procedures/tests 9, 10, 11.
Test for Alkaloids (Dragendroff’s Test): 2 ml of each extract was acidified with few drops of dilute hydrochloric acid. To this acidic medium, 1 ml of Dragendroff’s reagent (Potassium bismuth iodide) was added. An orange or reddish-brown precipitate produced indicates the presence of alkaloids.
Test for Flavonoids (Shinoda Test): The presence of flavonoids can be confirmed by treating the alcoholic plant extract with few fragments of magnesium ribbon and hydrochloric acid. The reaction mixture develops pink, scarlet, or crimson red color, indicates the presence of flavonoids.
Test for Saponins (Foam Test): 1 ml of each extract shaken with 10 ml of distilled water and it was agitated in a graduated cylinder for 10 min. The formation of persistent honey-comb like froth indicates the presence of saponins.
Test for Quinones: A small amount of extract was treated with concentrated HCl and observed for the formation of a yellow color precipitate.
Test for Tannins (Lead Acetate Test): To 2 ml of each extract add a few drops of 10% Lead acetate were added. The appearance of a white precipitate indicates the presence of tannins.
Test for Terpenoids and Steroids: To 1ml of the extract, 50% H2SO4 is added along the sides of the test tube, to which a mixture of methanolic HCl and acetic anhydride was added carefully. If there is any change in color, from green to blue-green (sometimes via red or blue) indicates the presence of terpenoids and steroids.
Test for Phenols: When 0.5 ml of FeCl3 (w/v) solution was added to 2 ml of rest solution, the formation of an intense color indicates the presence of phenols.
Coumarins: A few drops of alcoholic sodium hydroxide were added to the 2 ml of extract. The formation of yellow color indicated the presence of coumarins.
Test for Glycosides: 2 ml of extract was mixed with a little anthrone and add few drops of conc. H2SO4 and warmed gently over a water bath. The presence of glycosides was identified by dark green color formation.
Resins: 2 ml of extract was treated with acetone. To this, a small amount of water was added and shaken. The appearance of turbidity indicates the presence of resins.
GC-MS Analysis: The GC-MS analysis of solvent extracts from leaves was performed using an Agilent GC-MS (model-7890 A, MS 5975) equipped with an HP- 5MS fused capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm ID × 0.25 um Film Thickness). Inert helium gas was used as a carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 1ml/1 min. An aliquot of 2µl of two solvent extract solutions of the sample was injected into the column with an injector temperature of 280 °C. Mass transfer line and injector temperature were set at 220 °C and 300 °C, respectively. The oven temperature was programmed from 50-150 °C at 3 °C/min, then held isothermal for 10 min and finally raised to 250 °C at 10 C/min. For gas chromatography-mass spectroscopic detection, an electron ionization system with ionization energy 70eV was used and the detector was operated in scan mode from 40-500 amu. The total running time was 55.3 min.
Interpretation of Mass Spectrum (MS): Interpretation on GC-MS was conducted using the National Institute of Standard and Technology (NIST) Data Base Library 2.0 version having more than 62,000 patterns. The spectrum of the unknown component stored in the NIST library. The name, molecular weight and structure of the components of the test materials were ascertained.
Microorganisms: The antibacterial activity of the crude extracts was determined by using both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Three-gram positive bacteria namely Bacillus megaterium, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Enterococcus faecalis and three gram-negative bacteria namely Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus vulgaris and Escherichia coli were taken for study. For antifungal activity, Candida albicans and Aspergillus flavus were used for the study
Antimicrobial Activity: Nutrient agar (NA) and Czepak dox agar medium were used for the test of bacteria and fungi. Both mediums (100 ml) were sterilized at 15 lbs pressure (121 °C) for 15 min, cooled and inoculated with 0.1 ml of bacterial and fungal test suspension. Now the mixed medium was poured into Petri plates under aseptic conditions and allowed for solidification. Four wells of about 5 mm diameter were punched with a sterilized cork borer. Different concentrations of solvent extracts (50 μl, 100 μl, and 150 μl) were added to each well, and the addition of the solvent alone served as control. The inoculated bacterial plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and fungal plates were incubated at 28 °C for 48 h. The diameter of the inhibition zone was measured in millimeters.
Anticancer Activity by MTT Assay: The two solvent extracts (Ethyl acetate and Methanolic) were tested for in-vitro cytotoxicity using MCF 7 and HeLa cell lines by MTT (3, 4 5-Dimethylthiazol- 2- yl)- 2, 5- Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide) assay. 100 ml of diluted leaf extract was added to 100 ml of media followed by the addition of cell lines (6 × 105) into 96 well micro-titer and incubated overnight at 37 °C for 48 h. MTT was added after the incubation, precipitates were formed as a result of the reduction of the MTT salt to chromophore formazan crystals by the cells with metabolically active mitochondria. The optical density was measured at 570 nm on a microplate reader. Dose-response curve used to calculate IC50 dose values 12.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Preliminary phytochemical screening of the different solvent extracts like hexane, ethyl acetate and methanolic extract of leaves in L. zeylanica revealed the presence of various chemical compounds such as alkaloids, coumarins, flavonoids, glycosides, phenols, saponins, tannins, steroids and terpenoids Table 1. The secondary metabolites may be responsible for the medicinal properties of medicinal plants 13. In the present investigation, results suggest phytochemicals such as flavonoids, phenols, terpenoids, saponins and tannins may be responsible for antimicrobial and biological activities 14, 15.
Based on the results of preliminary phytochemical analysis GC-MS analysis carried out for the identification of bioactive compounds from GC fractions of the methanolic and ethyl acetate extracts of Lusia zeylanica. GC-MS is one of the important technological tools used to identify the profile of phytocompounds in plant species 16, 17.
The compounds were identified through mass spectrometry attached with GC and Later these compounds were confirmed based on the peak area, retention time and molecular formula were presented in Table 5. The mass spectra analysis of ethyl acetate extract chromatogram Fig. 1 reveals the presence of 11 phytocompounds and 3 unknown compounds in Table 2. The compounds found in ethyl acetate extract are 2,2-Dimethyl-3-propyloxirane Fig. 2A, Hydroperoxide, 1-ethylbutyl Fig. 2B, Ethanone, 1-cyclohexyl-Fig. 2C, Cyclopentanol, 1, methyl Fig. 2D, 9,12,15-Octadecatrien-1-ol Fig. 2E,4-Methyl-1,3-dioxane Fig. 2F, 5-Oxotetrahydrofuran-2- carboxylic acid Fig. 2G, Unknown compound Fig. 2H, Methyl cis-10-heptadecenoate Fig. 2I, (E)-9-Octadecenoic acid ethyl ester Fig. 2J, Unknown compound Fig. 2K, Triacontane Fig. 2L, Methyl 15-methyl-hexadecanoate Fig. 2M, Unidentified compound 3 Fig. 2N.
Similarly, methanolic extract chromatogram Fig. 3 consists of 7 phytocompounds and 4 unknown compounds in Table 3. The compounds in methanolic extract are (E)-1-[Bis[(E)-but-2-enoxy] methoxy] but-2-ene Fig. 4A, Unknown compound-1 Fig. 4B, Kaempferol 3-glucoside Fig. 4C, n-Tridecanoic acid methyl ester Fig. 4D, Unknown compound-2 Fig. 4E, 1, 4-Dimethyl-1,4,6,7-tetrahydroimidazo [4, 5-e] [1,4] diazepine-5,8-dione Fig. 4F, Phthalic acid, butyl hexyl ester Fig. 4G, Unkown compound-2 Fig. 4H, (Z)-Icos-13-enoic acid Fig. 4I, Unknown compound-3 Fig. 4J, Octadecanoic acid, ethyl ester Fig. 4K.
Most of the reported phytocompounds have various biological activities, which were represented in Tables 2 and 3. The present study supported by previous GC-MS studies on Orchids, they have various bioactive compounds with therapeutic potential 18, 19, 20.
TABLE 1: PRELIMINARY PHYTOCHEMICAL SCREENING OF LEAF EXTRACTS OF L. ZEYLANICA
S. no. | Phytochemicals | Test name | Hexane | Ethyl acetate | Methanol |
1 | Alkaloids | Dragendorff’s test | - | - | - |
2 | Coumarins | Sodium hydroxide test | - | + | + |
3 | Flavonoids | Ferric chloride test | - | + | + |
4 | Glycosides | Anthrone test | - | + | - |
5 | Phenolic compounds | Phenol test | - | + | + |
6 | Quinones | H2SO4 test | - | - | - |
7 | Resins | Acetone H2O test | - | - | + |
8 | Saponins | Foam test | - | - | + |
9 | Tannins | Braemer’s test | - | - | + |
10 | Steroids | Salkowski test | - | + | - |
11 | Terpenoids | Salkowski test | - | + | - |
(+) = positive (present); (-) = negative (absent)
FIG. 1: GC-MS CHROMATOGRAM OF ETHYL ACETATE LEAF EXTRACT OF L. ZEYLANICA
FIG. 2(A-D): GC-MS CHROMATOGRAM OF PHYTOCHEMICALS IDENTIFIED IN ETHYL ACETATE LEAF EXTRACT OF L. ZEYLANICA
FIG. 2(E-H): GC-MS CHROMATOGRAM OF PHYTOCHEMICALS IDENTIFIED IN ETHYL ACETATE LEAF EXTRACT OF L. ZEYLANICA
FIG. 2(I-L): GC-MS CHROMATOGRAM OF PHYTOCHEMICALS IDENTIFIED IN ETHYL ACETATE LEAF EXTRACT OF L. ZEYLANICA
FIG. 2(M-N): GC-MS CHROMATOGRAM OF PHYTOCHEMICALS IDENTIFIED IN ETHYL ACETATE LEAF EXTRACT OF L. ZEYLANICA
FIG. 3: GC-MS CHROMATOGRAM OF METHANOLIC LEAF EXTRACT OF L. ZEYLANICA
FIG. 4(A-D): GC-MS CHROMATOGRAM OF PHYTOCHEMICALS IDENTIFIED IN METHANOLIC LEAF EXTRACT OF L. ZEYLANICA
FIG. 4(E-H): GC-MS CHROMATOGRAM OF PHYTOCHEMICALS IDENTIFIED IN METHANOLIC LEAF EXTRACT OF L. ZEYLANICA
FIG. 4 (I-K): GC-MS CHROMATOGRAM OF PHYTOCHEMICALS IDENTIFIED IN METHANOLIC LEAF EXTRACT OF L. ZEYLANICA
Based on the results of phytochemical analysis Ethyl acetate and methanolic crude extracts were selected for antimicrobial activity. In the present study highest zone of inhibition was observed in ethyl acetate extract (200 μl) against Lactobacillus acidophilus (18 mm), whereas methanolic extract (200 μl) showed the highest zone of inhibition against Candida albicans (18 mm) Plate 1 A-D; Table 4. No zone of inhibition observed against both extracts for Pencillium citrinum. The degree of solubility of orchid phytoconstituents differs for various solvents 21. The present work shows significant similarities with various antimicrobial activities of orchids 22-25.
TABLE 2: BIOACTIVE COMPOUNDS PRESENT IN ETHYL ACETATE EXTRACT OF L. ZEYLANICA BY USING GC-MS ANALYSIS
S. no. | Retention time (min) | Peak area % | Name of the
compound |
Molecular formula | Molecular weight | Biological
activity |
1 | 2.1333 | 8.37 | 2,2-Dimethyl-3-propyloxirane | C7H14O | 114.188g/mol | No activity |
2 | 3.5667 | 4.33 | Hydroperoxide, 1-ethylbutyl | C6H14O2 | 118.176g/mol | No activity |
3 | 5.5167 | 13.8 | Ethanone, 1-cyclohexyl- | C8H14O | 126.199g/mol | No activity |
4 | 7.4500 | 4.44 | Cyclopentanol, 1 methyl | C6H12O | 100.161g/mol | No activity |
5 | 8.7333 | 6.26 | Cyclopentanol, 1 methyl | C18H32O | 264.453g/mol | Antioxidant & Antibacterial26 |
6 | 12.5162 | .94 | 4-Methyl-1,3-dioxane | C5H10O2 | 102.133g/mol | Methyl guanidine inhibitor27 |
7 | 14.800 | 10.02 | 5-Oxotetrahydrofuran-2- carboxylic acid | C5H6O4 | 130.099g/mol | Acidifier and arachidonic acid inhibitor 27 |
8 | 24.7667 | 13.93 | Unidentified compound 1 | - | - | - |
9 | 30.5667 | 3.92 | Methyl cis-10-heptadecenoate | C18H34O2 | 282.468g/mol | Catechol-O-Methyl Transferase inhibitor27 |
10 | 37.4000 | 3.72 | (E)-9-Octadecenoic acid ethyl ester | C20H38O2 | 310.522g/mol | Anticancer and antitumour 27 |
11 | 46.0500 | 6.85 | Triacontane | C30H62 | 422.826g/mol | Antibacterial, Antidiabetic and antitumour28 |
12 | 42.5333 | 18.04 | Unidentified compound 2 | - | - | - |
13 | 53.3667 | 0.61 | Methyl 15-methylhexadecanoate | C18H36O2 | 284.484g/mol | Catechol-O-Methyl Transferase inhibitor27 |
14 | 56.6333 | 4.77 | Unidentified compound 3 | - | - | - |
TABLE 3: BIOACTIVE COMPOUNDS PRESENT IN METHANOLIC EXTRACT OF L. ZEYLANICA BY USING GC-MS ANALYSIS
S. no. | Retention time (min) | Peak area % | Name of the
compound |
Molecular formula | Molecular weight | Biological
activity |
1 | 4.6500 | 23.37 | (E)-1-[Bis[(E)-but-2-enoxy]methoxy]but-2-ene | C13H22O3 | 226.316 g/mol | No activity reported |
2 | 6.2333 | 9.00 | Unidentified compound 1 | - | - | - |
3 | 9.7500 | 1.92 | Kaempferol 3-glucoside | C21H20O11 | 448.38 g/mol | Anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anti-cancer, anti-diabetic 29 |
4 | 12.2167 | 3.9 | n-Tridecanoic acid methyl ester | C14H28O2 | 228.376 g/mol | Antitumour 27 |
5 | 17.8333 | 2.01 | Unidentified compound 2 | - | - | - |
6 | 19.9500 | 14.01 | 1,4-Dimethyl-1,4,6,7-tetrahydroimidazo[4,5-e][1,4]diazepine-5,8-dione | C8H10N4O2 | 194.191 g/mol | No activity |
7 | 24.3500 | 5.02 | Phthalic acid, butyl hexyl ester | C18H26O4 | 306.402 g/mol | Antimicrobial |
8 | 29.9500 | 21.65 | Unidentified compound 3 | - | - | - |
9 | 32.5833 | 0.83 | (Z)-Icos-13-enoic acid | C20H38O2 | 310.522 g/mol | Increase Zinc bioavailability27 |
10 | 45.1667 | 11.74 | Unidentified compound 4 | - | - | - |
11 | 47.5333 | 6.55 | Octadecanoic acid, ethyl ester | C20H40O2 | 312.538 g/mol | Antiviral, antibacterial and anticancer30 |
TABLE 4: ANTIMICROBIAL STUDY SHOWING ZONE OF INHIBITION OF SOLVENT EXTRACTS OF L. ZEYLANICA
Microorganism | Ethyl acetate extraxt | Methanolic extract | ||||||
Zone of inhibition (mm) | ||||||||
50µl | 100µl | 150µl | 200µl | 50µl | 100µl | 150µl | 200µl | |
Bacillus megaterium | 7±0.12 | 10±0.15 | 12±0.05 | 14±0.11 | - | 4±0.09 | 5±0.11 | 7±0.07 |
Lactobacillus acidophilus | 7±0.14 | 9±0.09 | 13±0.13 | 18±0.12 | - | 3±0.07 | 7±0.14 | 9±0.11 |
Klebisiella pneumoniae | 5±0.09 | 7±0.11 | 8±0.14 | 1±0.07 | 3±0.09 | 4±0.14 | 6±0.12 | 7±0.07 |
Escherichia coli | 6±0.11 | 8±0.07 | 8±0.09 | 11±0.13 | - | 4±0.12 | 5±0.19 | 6±0.09 |
Enterococcus faecalis | 5±0.13 | 8±0.13 | 11±0.10 | 13±0.07 | 3±0.11 | 4±0.09 | 6±0.12 | 7±0.11 |
Proteus vulgaris | 6±0.15 | 9±0.12 | 10±0.09 | 17±0.15 | - | 2±0.11 | 4±0.09 | 5±0.07 |
Candida albicans | 7±0.10 | 9±0.12 | 11±0.15 | 14±0.05 | 3±0.12 | 6±0.05 | 11±0.07 | 18±0.15 |
Aspergillus flavus | 3±0.09 | 5±0.11 | 8±0.13 | 13±0.14 | - | - | - | - |
Penicillum citrinum | - | - | - | 8±0.13 | - | - | - | - |
PLATE 1A-D: ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF ETHYL ACETATE AND METHANOLIC EXTRACTS OF L. ZEYLANICA ON LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS (A & C), ON CANDIDA ALBICANS ON (B & D)
Anticancer Activity: Medicinal orchids have a significant role in the prevention of cancer and its treatment 31, 32, 33 IC50 value is less than 1000μg/ml for crude plant extract is toxic, while non-toxic (inactive) if it is greater than 1000 μg/ml 34. In our study, the death rate of MCF and HeLa cell lines increase with a rise in the concentration of L. zeylanica leaf extract. Anticancer activity of ethyl acetate and methanolic leaf extract on MCF-7 and HeLa cell lines were shown in Plate 2A and 2B; Plate 3A and 3B. The viability percentage of MCF-7 cell line of ethyl acetate and methanolic leaf extracts at concentration 100 µg/ml reduced from 100% to 39.65% and 36.39% respectively Table 5. Similarly, for HeLa cell lines it was reduced to 44.44% and 40.93% in Table 6.
TABLE 5: CYTOTOXIC PROPERTIES OF ETHYL ACETATE EXTRACT OF L. ZEYLANICA ON MCF -7 AND HELA CELL LINES
Cell line | Concentration(µg/ml) | Absorbance at 570 nm | Average | Average-Blank | % Viability | IC50 (µg/ml) | ||
MCF-7 | 100 | 0.821 | 0.823 | 0.825 | 0.823 | 0.816 | 39.65 |
48.439 |
75 | 0.915 | 0.917 | 0.918 | 0.916 | 0.909 | 44.169 | ||
50 | 1.043 | 1.045 | 1.047 | 1.045 | 1.038 | 50.437 | ||
25 | 1.098 | 1.101 | 1.102 | 1.1 | 1.093 | 53.109 | ||
10 | 1.189 | 1.191 | 1.193 | 1.191 | 1.184 | 57.531 | ||
5 | 1.245 | 1.247 | 1.249 | 1.247 | 1.24 | 60.252 | ||
Untreated | 2.065 | 2.066 | 2.065 | 2.065 | 2.058 | 100 | ||
Blank | 0.007 | 0.008 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0 | |||
HeLa | 100 | 0.851 | 0.853 | 0.855 | 0.853 | 0.848 | 44.444 |
67.914 |
75 | 0.935 | 0.936 | 0.938 | 0.936 | 0.931 | 48.794 | ||
50 | 0.995 | 0.997 | 0.999 | 0.997 | 0.992 | 51.991 | ||
25 | 1.079 | 1.081 | 1.083 | 1.081 | 1.076 | 56.394 | ||
10 | 1.186 | 1.188 | 1.189 | 1.187 | 1.182 | 61.949 | ||
5 | 1.272 | 1.274 | 1.276 | 1.274 | 1.269 | 66.509 | ||
Untreated | 1.913 | 1.914 | 1.913 | 1.913 | 1.908 | 100 | ||
Blank | 0.005 | 0.006 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0 |
TABLE 6: CYTOTOXIC PROPERTIES OF METHANOLIC LEAF EXTRACT OF L. ZEYLANICA ON MCF -7 AND HELA CELL LINES
Cell line | Concentration(µg/ml) | Absorbance at 570nm | Average | Average-Blank | % Viability | IC50 (µg/ml) | ||
MCF-7 | 100 | 0.754 | 0.756 | 0.758 | 0.756 | 0.749 | 36.394 |
18.360 |
75 | 0.812 | 0.814 | 0.816 | 0.814 | 0.807 | 39.212 | ||
50 | 0.885 | 0.887 | 0.889 | 0.887 | 0.88 | 42.76 | ||
25 | 0.975 | 0.977 | 0.978 | 0.976 | 0.969 | 47.084 | ||
10 | 1.062 | 1.064 | 1.066 | 1.064 | 1.057 | 51.36 | ||
5 | 1.133 | 1.135 | 1.137 | 1.135 | 1.128 | 54.81 | ||
Untreated | 2.065 | 2.066 | 2.065 | 2.065 | 2.058 | 100 | ||
Blank | 0.007 | 0.008 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0 | |||
HeLa | 75 | 0.842 | 0.844 | 0.845 | 0.843 | 0.838 | 43.92 | 49.497 |
50 | 0.953 | 0.955 | 0.957 | 0.955 | 0.95 | 49.79 | ||
25 | 1.025 | 1.027 | 1.028 | 1.026 | 1.021 | 53.511 | ||
10 | 1.096 | 1.098 | 1.099 | 1.097 | 1.092 | 57.232 | ||
5 | 1.295 | 1.297 | 1.299 | 1.297 | 1.292 | 67.714 | ||
Untreated | 1.913 | 1.914 | 1.913 | 1.913 | 1.908 | 100 | ||
Blank | 0.005 | 0.006 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0 | |||
100 | 0.754 | 0.756 | 0.758 | 0.756 | 0.749 | 36.394 |
Results indicate methanolic leaf extract against the MCF-7 cell line was found to suppress cell proliferation and it showed good cytotoxicity when compared to HeLa cell lines. The lowest IC50 value 18.36 µg/ml observed for methanolic leaf extract on MCF-7 cell lines. It indicates that the inhibitory effect of methanolic leaf extract of L. zeylanica on breast cancer lines at different concentrations was found as potential chemotherapeutic agents to induce apoptosis in cancer cells.
The present results were supported by previous anticancer studies on orchids 8, 35. Hence, the findings of this study proved that leaf extract of L. zeylanica has an anti-cancer effect and this species could be used to develop anticancer drugs.
PLATE 2A: ANTICANCER ACTIVITY OF ETHYL ACETATE EXTRACT OF L. ZEYLANICA ON HeLa CELL LINE
PLATE 2B: ANTICANCER ACTIVITY OF ETHYL ACETATE EXTRACT OF L. ZEYLANICA ON MCF-7 CELL LINE
PLATE 3A: ANTICANCER ACTIVITY OF METHANOL EXTRACT OF L. ZEYLANICA ON HeLa CELL LINE
PLATE 3B: ANTICANCER ACTIVITY OF METHANOL EXTRACT OF L. ZEYLANICA ON MCF-7 CELL LINE
CONCLUSION: Phytochemical analysis of epiphytic orchid L. zeylanica confirmed the presence of bioactive compounds. The various solvent extracts of proved conclusively anti-microbial and in-vitro anticancer activity on MCF-7 and HeLa cell lines. Further studies should be done to isolate the unknown compounds present in the extract and develop novel drugs to treat cancer.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Authors are wished to acknowledge Md. Rahmatullah and I. Vera Kishore Kumar Research scholars in the Department of Botany and Microbiology, Acharya Nagarjuna University for collection of Orchids and to carry out this work.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: Authors do not have any conflict of interest.
REFERENCES:
- Iwu MW, Duncan AR and Okunji CO: “New antimicrobials of plant origin,” in Perspectives on New Crops and NewUses, 1999 J. Janick, Ed., 457-62, ASHS Press, Alexandria, Va, USA.
- Rosa M and Perz G: Orchids- A review of uses in traditional medicine, its phytochemistry and pharmacology. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 2009; 4(8): 592-30.
- Shanavaskhan AE, Sivadasan M, Alfarhan AH and Thomas J: Ethnomedicinal aspects of angiospermic epiphytes and parasites of Kerala, India. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 2012; 11 (2): 250-58.
- Paul S and Hegde SN: Some orchids of ethnobotanical interest. In orchids; conservation, culture, Farming and Trade. Ed. Hegde, S.N., Himalayan publishers, New Delhi, India 2001; 48-51.
- Khasim S and Rao PRM: Medicinal importance of orchids. The Botanica 1999; 49: 86-91.
- Kiran R, Kekuda PTR, Kumar PHG, Hosetti BB and Krishnaswamy K: Biological activities of Sarcanthus pauciflorus. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science 2013; 397: 105-10.
- Hossain MM: Traditional therapeutic uses of some indigenous orchids of Bangladesh. Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Science and Biotechnology 2009; 3: 100-06.
- Sohag SI, Hoque MM and Huda MK: Phytochemical screening and antioxidant activity of rare medicinal orchid Luisia zeylanica Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2017; 6(4): 688-92.
- Trease GE and Evans WC: Textbook of Pharmacognosy. Balliese Tindall and Company, London 1983; 343-83.
- Chhabra SC, Uiso FC and Mshiu EN: Phytochemical screening of Tanzanian medicinal plants. International Journal of Ethnopharmacology 1984; 11: 157-79.
- Harborne JB: Phytochemical methods. Chapman and Hall Publications, London. 1984; 288.
- Bhat RP: Anticancer activities of plant extracts of Gymnacranthera farquhariana (Hook. f. & Thomson) Warb, Myristica fatua var. magnifica (Beddome) Sinclair and Samadera indica Gaertner. Adv. Obes Weight Manag. Control 2017; 6: 167-71.
- Stray F: The Natural Guide to Medicinal Herb and Plants. Tiger Books International, London 1998; 12-16.
- Divya K, Pradeep HR, Kumar KK, Venkatesh KRH and Jyothi T: Herbal drug Swietenia mahogany jacq- a review. Global Journal of Research on Medicinal Plants & Indigenous Medicine 2012; 1: 557.
- Sheel R, Nisha K and Kumar J: Preliminary phytochemical screening of methanolic extract of infortunatum. ISRO Journal of Applied Chemistry 2014; 7: 10-13.
- Merlin NJ, Parthasarathy V, Manavalan R and Kumaravel S: Chemical investigation of aerial parts of Gmelina asiatica Linn by GC-MS. Pharmacognosy Research 2009; 1(3): 152-56.
- Janakiraman N, Johnson M and Sathish SS: GC-MS analysis of bioactive constituents of Peristrophe bicalyculata (Retz) Nees. (Acanthaceae). Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine 2012; 2(1): S46-S49.
- Kalaiarasan A and John SA: Some Bioactive constituents of GC-MS analysis of Bulbophyllum kaitense Stem, Eastern Ghats of India. Int J Pharma and Bio Sciences 2011; 2(4): 156-60.
- Dandekar R, Fegade B and Bhaskar VH: GC-MS analysis of phytoconstituents in alcohol extract of Epiphyllum oxypetalum J. Pharm Phytoch 2015; 4(1): 149-54.
- Keerthiga M and Anand SP: Bioactive Compound Evaluation of Ethanol Extract from Geodorum densiflorum (Lam.) Schltr. By GC-MS analysis. Int J Pharmal Res 2015; 5(6): 139-44.
- Manilal KS and Sathishkumar C: Researchers on Indian Orchids. In: S. P. Vij (1st ed), Biology, Conservation and culture of Orchids 1986; 1-16.
- Sahaya SB, Chitra DB, Moin S and Servin WP: Evaluation of bioactive potential of Coelogyne nervosa rich. - an endemic medicinal orchid of western ghats, India Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2013; 6(S-1): 114-18.
- Kumar T, Alexander A, Dewangan D and Nagori K: Anthelmintic activity of the whole plant of purpurea (linn.) Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2011; 4(S-1): 48-49.
- Shanmuga PR, Senthil SR and Britto SJ: Antibacterial screening of the leaf extracts of Vanda coerulea ex Lindl. Int J Res Pharm Sci 2011; 2(1): 60-62.
- Radhika B, Murthy JVVSN and Grace DN: Preliminary phytochemical analysis & antibacterial activity against clinical pathogens of medicinally important orchid Cymbidium aloifolium (L.) Sw. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research 2013; 4(10): 3925-31.
- Rajashyamala LG and Elango V: Identification of bioactive components and its biological activities of Evolvulus alsinoides A GC-MS study. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2015; 3(1):41-44.
- Duke’s Phytochemical and Ethno botanical Databases. http://www.ars-grin.gov/duke/chem-activities.html.
- Mammen D, Daniel M and Sane RT: Seasonal and geographical variations in chemical constituents of Leptadenia reticulate, Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res 2010; 4 (2): 111-16.
- Riaz A, Raul A, Hussain G, Zahoor MK, Jabeen F, Subhani Z, Younis T, Ali M, Sarfraz I and Selamoglu Z: Astragalin: A bioactive phytochemical with potential therapeutic activitie. Advances in Pharmacological Sciences 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9794625.
- Sudharsan S, Saravanan, Shanmugam A, Vairamani S, Kumar RM, Menaga S and Ramesh N: Isolation and characterization of octadecanoic acid from the ethyl acetate root extract of Trigonella foneum graecum by Using Hydroponics Method. J Bioterr Biodef 2010; 2: 105.
- Prasad R and Koch B: Antitumor activity of ethanolic extract of Dendrobium formosum in T-Cell Lymphoma: an in-vitro and in-vivo BioMed Research International 2014; 1-11.
- Prasad R and Koch B: In-vitro Anticancer Activities of Ethanolic Extracts of Dendrobium crepidatum and Dendrobium chrysanthum against T-cell lymphoma. J Cytol Histol 2016; 7: 4.
- Bhatt DR, Jethva KD and Zaveri MN: In-vitro cytotoxicity studies of the therapeutic orchid: Eulophia nuda. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2018; 7(4): 680-83.
- Meyer B, Ferrigni N, Putnam J, Jacobsen L, Nichols DJ and McLaughlin JL: Brine shrimp: a convenient general bioassay for active plant constituents. Planta medica 1982; 45(05): 31-4.
- Haridas R, Manorama S and Thekkan S: In-vitro cytotoxicity activity of Malaxis rheedii sw methanolic extract against HeLa cell line and MCF-7 cell line Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2016; 9(6): 244-46.
How to cite this article:
Katta J, Rampilla V and Mohamad KS: Evaluation of phytochemical and pharmacological aspects of epiphytic orchid Luisia zeylanica Lindl. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2020; 11(3): 1333-49. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(3).1333-49.
All © 2013 are reserved by the International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
41
1333-1349
1394
1052
English
IJPSR
J. Katta, V. Rampilla * and K. S. Mohamad
Dr. L. H. R. Government Degree College, Mylavaram, Krishna, Andhra Pradesh, India.
venkateshrampilla70@gmail.com
22 May 2019
18 January 2020
05 February 2020
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.11(3).1333-49
01 March 2020