EXTRACTIVE SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC DETERMINATION OF MIANSERIN HYDROCHLORIDE BY ACID- DYE COMPLEXATION METHOD IN PURE AND IN PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS
HTML Full TextEXTRACTIVE SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC DETERMINATION OF MIANSERIN HYDROCHLORIDE BY ACID- DYE COMPLEXATION METHOD IN PURE AND IN PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS
- S. Farag 1, M. S. Afifi 1 and M. M. Abd-Rabow*2
Faculty of science, Al-Azhar University 1, Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt
Drugs and Toxicology Expert, Chemical Laboratory of Medico-Legal Department 2, Ministry of Justice, Cairo, Egypt
ABSTRACT
A simple and sensitive extractive spectrophotometric method has been described for the assay of Mianserin hydrochloride (M-HCl) either in pure form or in pharmaceutical solid dosage form. The developed method involves formation of colored chloroform extractable ion-association complex of Mianserin hydrochloride (M-HCl) with Picric acid (PA), Chlorophenol red (ClPR), Bromthymol blue (BrTB), Bromcresol purple (BrCP) reagents. The extracted complexes showed absorbance maxima at optimum wavelength using visible spectrophotometer. Beer’s law is obeyed in the concentration range of 1-42 μg/mL. Correlation coefficient was found to be ≥ 0.9985. In addition we have determined the molar absorptivity, Sandell sensitivity and the optimum conditions for quantitative analysis of the investigated drugs.
Keywords:
Spectrophotometry, Mianserin hydrochloride, Pharmaceutical analysis, |
Ion-association complex
INTRODUCTION: Mianserin hydrochloride (M-HCl) is chemically known as 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 14b- Hexahydro- 2- methyldibenzo [c, f] - pyrazino [1, 2- a]azepine hydrochloride (Fig. 1) It is used as an antidepressant medications called a tetracyclic antidepressant. This type of medicine acts on nerve cells in the brain. M-HCl (C18H20N2HCl) is works by preventing noradrenaline from being reabsorbed back into the nerve cells in the brain. It also blocks certain receptors in the brain that bind released serotonin, which helps prolong the mood lightening effect of any released noradrenaline and serotonin. In this way, mianserin hydrochloride helps relieve depression 1. Several analytical methods have been applied determine Mianserin hydrochloride (M-HCl) quantitatively in their dosage forms including spectrophotometric methods 2-4, High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) 5-7, capillary electrophoresis 8, 9 and other spectrophotometric for another drugs 10-14.
FIG. 1: TWO AND THREE DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURES OF MIANSERIN HYDROCHLORIDE
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Apparatus: The electronic absorption spectral measurements of M-HCl (Fig. 2) with selected reagents were recorded on Jenway 6505 UV-Vis spectrophotometer equipped with quartz cell of 1 cm optical path length with a resolution of 0.1 nm. The pH of the prepared solutions was adjustment using Jenway 3510 pH meter. All spectroscopic measurements were carried out at room temperature (25 ± 2 ◦C). Moreover, doubly distilled water were obtained ELGA distillation apparatus model UHQ-II-MK3, UK.
FIG. 2: THE ELECTRONIC ABSORPTION MEASUREMENTS IN THE VISIBLE REGION FOR MIANSERIN HYDROCHLORIDE ION-ASSOCIATES WITH PICRIC ACID, CHLOROPHENOL RED, BROMTHYMOL BLUE AND BROMCRESOL PURPLE
Drugs, reagents and solutions: Mianserin hydrochloride and Tolvon tablets (30 mg/tablet) were obtained through the courtesy of SEDICO Pharmaceutical Company, 6 October City, Egypt. All chemicals and reagents are of analytical grade. Chlorophenol red (ClPR), bromthymol blue (BrTB) and bromcresol purple (BrCP) are products of Merck chemical company. Picric acid (PA) is a product of Arablab chemicals while; sodium acetate trihydrate, acetic acid and anhydrous sodium sulfate are of Merck Chemical Company. The common solvents of chloroform, benzene, n-hexane, petroleum ether, toluene, cyclohexane and diethyl ether were purchased from Lab-Scan. The M-HCl drug, solvents as well as the reagents have been used as supplied without further purifications.
Stock solutions of 2.0x10-3 M were prepared with doubly distilled water. Acetate buffer solutions were made of a mixture of 0.1 M acetic acid (1050 g/L) and 0.1 M sodium acetate trihydrate (13.6 g/L), on the other side we prepare Phosphate buffer solutions were made of a mixture of 0.1M disodium hydrogen phosphate (14.2g/L), 0.1M HCl and 0.1M NaOH as seeing below.
Acetate buffer solution (pH 3.0): 1.0 L of acetate buffer solution of pH was prepared by adding of 982.3 mL of 0.1 M acetic acid solution to 17.7 mL of 0.1 M sodium acetate.
Acetate buffer solution (pH 4.0): 1.0 L of acetate buffer solution of pH was prepared by adding of 947.0 mL of 0.1 M acetic acid solution to 153.0 mL of 0.1 M sodium acetate.
Acetate buffer solution (pH 5.0): 1.0 L of acetate buffer solution of pH was prepared by adding of 357.0 mL of 0.1 M acetic acid solution to 643.0 mL of 0.1 M sodium acetate.
Acetate buffer solution (pH 6.0): 1.0 L of acetate buffer solution of pH was prepared by adding of 52.2 mL of 0.1 M acetic acid solution to 947.8 mL of 0.1 M sodium acetate.
Phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0): 1.0 L of Phosphate buffer solution of pH was prepared by adding of 756.0 mL of 0.1 M disodium hydrogen phosphate solution to 244.0 mL of 0.1 M hydrochloric acid.
Phosphate buffer solution (pH 8.0): 1.0 L of Phosphate buffer solution of pH was prepared by adding of 955.1 mL of 0.1 M disodium hydrogen phosphate solution to 44.9 mL of 0.1 M hydrochloric acid.
Phosphate buffer solution (pH 9.0): 1.0 L of Phosphate buffer solution of pH was prepared by adding of 955.0 mL of 0.1 M disodium hydrogen phosphate solution to 45.0 mL of 0.1 M hydrochloric acid.
Phosphate buffer solution (pH 10.0): 1.0 L of Phosphate buffer solution of pH was prepared by adding of 966.4 mL of 0.1 M disodium hydrogen phosphate solution to 33.6 mL of 0.1 M sodium hydroxide.
Phosphate buffer solution (pH 11.0): 1.0 L of Phosphate buffer solution of pH was prepared by adding of 965.3 mL of 0.1 M disodium hydrogen phosphate solution to 34.7 mL of 0.1 M sodium hydroxide.
General procedure: Into 50 ml separating funnel, 5.0 mL (2.0x10-3 M) PA, ClPR, BrTB and BrCP were added to different volumes of solution containing (1.0x10-3 M) M-HCl. In both cases 2.0 mL of buffer solution were added and the volume was made up to 10 mL with distilled water. The formed ion–associates was extracted using a separating funnel with 10 mL chloroform by shaking for two minutes and allowed to separates into two phases. The organic layer was collected and dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate then complete to 10 ml chloroform. The absorbance of the extract was measured at the recommended wavelength (lmax) as recorded in Table 1. The blank was prepared using the same method in absence of the examined drug.
Application to various dosage forms: Four tablets (30 mg/tablet) M-HCl drug were weighed into a small dish, powdered and mixed well, then dissolved in 100 mL distilled water, a turbid solution was shaken well and filtered through a filter paper to obtain a clear solution. Then, the clear solution was diluted with distilled water in a 250 mL calibrated measuring flask. The drug content of this solution was obtained by applying the general procedure to aliquot containing different volumes of solution drugs as described above.
TABLE 1: CHARACTERISTICS AND ANALYTICAL DATA OF MIANSERIN HYDROCHLORIDE (M-HCL) ION-ASSOCIATES WITH PICRIC ACID, CHLOROPHENOL RED, BROMTHYMOL BLUE AND BROMCRESOL PURPLE
Parameters | M-HCl /PA | M-HCl /ClPR | M-HCl /BrTB | M-HCl /BrCP |
λmax (nm ) | 410 | 408 | 406 | 410 |
Beer’s law up to (µg/mL) | 42 | 30 | 21 | 21 |
Molar absorptivity (ε), Lmol-1 m-1 | 8.75x103 | 1.12x104 | 1.1x104 | 1.2x104 |
Sandell sensitivity, µgcm-2 | 3.43x10-2 | 2.68x10-2 | 2.73x10-2 | 2.5x10-2 |
Color of ion-pair | Yellow | Yellow | Yellow | Yellow |
Regression equation* | ||||
Intercept | 0.0111 | 0.0008 | 0.0002 | 0.0027 |
Slope | 0.0266 | 0.0373 | 0.0368 | 0.0433 |
Correlation Coefficient | 0.9996 | 0.9985 | 0.9986 | 0.9987 |
Optimum condition | ||||
Extracting solvents | chloroform | Chloroform | Chloroform | Chloroform |
pH range | 5-6 | 5-6 | 5-6 | 5-6 |
Time on the stability | 18 | 20 | 18 | 22 |
Temperature on the stability | 60 | 70 | 65 | 65 |
The stoichiometry of the ion- associates | 1:1 | 1:1 | 1:1 | 1:1 |
*A = a + bc where c is the concentration µg/mL
Stoichiometric relationship: Job’s method of continuous variation method 16 was employed; 1.0x10-3 M solution of M-HCl drugs was mixed with 1.0x10-3 M solution of each selected reagent. A series of solutions were prepared in which the total volume of drug and reagent was kept constant (5.0 mL). The reagents were mixed with each drug in various proportions along with the chosen buffer solution, which then diluted in 10.0 mL calibrated flask with the appropriate solvent following the above mentioned procedures.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Several parameters such as reagent concentration, sequence of addition, effect of extracting solvent, effect of pH, effect of time, were investigated to attain the optimum conditions to achieve high sensitivity, stability and reproducible results.
Optimization: We aimed to determine the most favorable conditions to achieve maximum color intensity of M-HCl drug. Therefore, we have investigated the effects of pH, solvent and its polarity, sequence of mixing, time and temperatures to achieve the optimum conditions to aid in accurate quantitative analysis for these drugs. The optimum wavelength(s) of maximum intensity (lmax) of M-HCl (Table 1) and their ion associates with PA, ClPR, BrTB and BrCP reagents are recorded at the choozen optimum conditions. The absorption band of M-HCl reveals lmax at 410, 408, 406 and 410 nm with PA, ClPR, BrTB and BrCP reigned and their ion–associates. It worth mentioning that, the maximum absorbencies (λmax) were recorded and tested against reagent blank (prepared in the same manner without the addition of drug) to study the influence of each of the following variables on the formed ion associates between drugs and reagents.
Effect of the extracting solvent: The solvent polarity affects both the extracting efficiency and the molar absorptivity (e) of the formed ion associates. Therefore, we have used various water immiscible organic solvents like chloroform, benzene, n-hexane, petroleum ether, toluene, cyclohexane and diethyl ether to investigate the solvent effect on the extraction of drugs against the reagents. The most convenient solvent is chloroform; it provides maximum color intensity (absorbance ~0.7) as well as powerful extraction of ion associates for M-HCl drug. Moreover, toluene and benzene could be also useful, however their maximum absorbance ~57% and 50% of chloroform for M-HCl. Other solvents n-hexane, cyclohexane, petroleum ether and diethyl ether are not recommended for M-HCl (Fig. 3) drug.
FIG. 3: EFFECT OF EXTRACTING SOLVENTS ON: MIANSERIN HYDROCHLORIDE ION-ASSOCIATES WITH PICRIC ACID, CHLOROPHENOL RED, BROMTHYMOL BLUE AND BROMCRESOL PURPLE
Effect of pH: As stated earlier different stock of acetate buffer solutions were prepared with pH of 3, 4, 5 and 6 to account for the effect of pH on the formation of ion associates. Initially 5.0 mL of 2x10-3 M of reagent was mixed with 1.0 mL (5x10-4 M) of the drug solution, then 2.0 mL of Acetate buffer was added to adjust the pH followed by dilution with distilled water in 10.0 mL calibrated measuring flask. The adjusted optimum pH was found to be 5-6 for M-HCl.
Effect of Temperature and Time: The effect of temperature and time on ion associates formation and stability was studied by measuring the absorbance of the extracted ion associates at different temperatures ranged form 25 to 90°C and at increasing time intervals, respectively. The results show that the ion associates were formed almost instantaneously at room temperature (25±2°C) and remain stable up to 70°C with all reagents. In addition, the developed color remains stable for 24 hrs. With reagents after one day a slight decrease in the color intensity of the ion associates was observed.
Effect of mixing sequence: The optimum sequence of mixing was found to be drug, reagent, buffer, and then solvent, which allow the highest color intensity and shortest time to obtain maximum absorbance. On the other hand, other sequences rather the one given above requires more time longer time in addition to lower stability of the ion associates.
The stoichiometry of the ion- associates: The Stoichiometric ratio of the M-HCl ion–associates formed between drug of interest and the selected reagents has been determined by implementing the molar ratio method 15 and continuous variation method (16). The result indicates the existence of 1:1 at a definite λmax recorded in (Table 1).
Specificity: No interference was observed during the quantitative determination of M-HCl drug with all reagents in presence of different additives such as lactose, glycerol, propylene glycol, sugar and starch which are present in its pharmaceutical preparations.
Conformity with Beer’s law: Beer’s law is obeyed in the concentration range 1-42 µg/mL of Mianserin hydrochloride (M-HCl; Fig. 4), respectively with PA, ClPR, BrTB and BrCP reagents.
FIG. 4: STANDARD CURVES OF: MIANSERIN HYDROCHLORIDE ION-ASSOCIATES WITH PICRIC ACID, CHLOROPHENOL RED, BROMTHYMOL BLUE AND BROMCRESOL PURPLE
The optical characteristics; Beer’s law limits, molar absorptivities, Sandell’s sensitivities 17 are summarized in Table 1 along with the results of regression analysis using the method of least square was made for the slope (b), intercept (a) and correlation coefficient (r) obtained from different concentrations.
Method Validation: Results obtained were compared with those of the official methods along with the statistical outcomes. The comparison ensures that there is no significant difference between the current study and the official methods as shown in (Table 2).
TABLE 2: CONCENTRATION OF MIANSERIN HYDROCHLORIDE IN µG AS DETERMINED FROM SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC METHODS
Reagent | Pure solution | Tolvon tablet | ||||
Taken | Found | Recovery % | Taken | Found | Recovery % | |
PA | 10.00 | 10.00 | 100.00 | 10.00 | 9.98 | 99.80 |
15.00 | 14.98 | 99.86 | 15.00 | 15.03 | 100.20 | |
20.00 | 19.99 | 99.95 | 20.00 | 19.87 | 99.35 | |
25.00 | 25.02 | 100.08 | 25.00 | 25.00 | 100.00 | |
30.00 | 30.01 | 100.03 | 30.00 | 30.02 | 100.06 | |
Mean recovery ± RSD*
99.98±0.0749 |
Mean recovery ± RSD*
99.8±0.295 |
|||||
ClPR | 10.00 | 9.98 | 99.80 | 10.00 | 10.02 | 100.20 |
15.00 | 15.00 | 100.00 | 15.00 | 15.01 | 100.06 | |
20.00 | 20.02 | 100.10 | 20.00 | 19.96 | 99.80 | |
25.00 | 25.03 | 100.12 | 25.00 | 25.97 | 103.88 | |
30.00 | 29.87 | 99.56 | 30.00 | 30.00 | 100.00 | |
Mean recovery ± RSD*
99.916±0.211 |
Mean recovery ± RSD*
100.78±1.551 |
|||||
BrTB | 4.00 | 3.98 | 99.50 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 100.00 |
8.00 | 7.97 | 99.62 | 8.00 | 7.99 | 99.87 | |
12.00 | 12.00 | 100.00 | 12.00 | 12.02 | 100.16 | |
16.00 | 16.02 | 100.12 | 16.00 | 15.99 | 99.93 | |
20.00 | 19.99 | 99.95 | 20.00 | 20.00 | 100.00 | |
Mean recovery ± RSD*
99.838±0.236 |
Mean recovery ± RSD*
99.992±0.097 |
|||||
BrCP | 4.00 | 4.02 | 100.50 | 4.00 | 4.05 | 101.25 |
8.00 | 8.03 | 100.37 | 8.00 | 7.96 | 99.95 | |
12.00 | 11.98 | 99.83 | 12.00 | 12.00 | 100.00 | |
16.00 | 15.99 | 99.93 | 16.00 | 16.02 | 100.12 | |
20.00 | 20.01 | 100.05 | 20.00 | 20.05 | 100.25 | |
Mean recovery ± RSD*
100.13±0.257 |
Mean recovery ± RSD*
100.31±0.478 |
* Relative standard deviation six replicates each
Six replicate determination at different concentration levels were carried out to test the precision and accuracy of the method. The recoveries were ranged from 99.80 to 100.78 % which reflect the high accuracy of the results, with reliable precision as indicated by very low values of standard deviation (Table 3). The performance of the proposed method was assessed by calculation of t and f tests compared with the Pharmacopoeial method 18, 19. Mean values were obtained with t and f testes at 95% confidence level for five degrees (n-1) = (6-1; i.e., six replicate minus 1) of freedom were in the accepted values.
TABLE 3: STATISTICAL TREATMENT OF DATA OBTAINED FOR MIANSERIN HYDROCHLORIDE APPLYING THE PROPOSED METHODS IN COMPARISON WITH THE PHARMACOPOEIAL METHOD
Parameters | Pharmacopoeial Method | M-HCl /PA | M-HCl /ClPR | M-HCl/ BrTB | M-HCl /BrCP |
Pure Solution | |||||
X ± SD | 99.82±0.072 | 99.98±.074 | 99.92±0.211 | 99.83±0.236 | 100.136±0.257 |
N* | 3 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
T value** | 5.062 | 1.009 | 0.093 | 2.924 | |
F value | 1.081 | 8.564 | 10.76 | 12.71 | |
Tablets | |||||
X ± SD | 99.84±0.692 | 99.9±0.295 | 100.7±1.55 | 99.99±0.097 | 100.315±0.47 |
N* | 3 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
T value** | 0.3399 | 1.495 | 3.813 | 2.424 | |
F value | 5.4890 | 5.024 | 18.52 | 2.088 |
a n is the number of replicates; b Theoretical value at 95% confidence level
CONCLUSION: The proposed method made use of a simple reagent, which most ordinary analytical laboratories can afford. The method is sufficiently sensitive to permit determinations as low as 1.0 μg/mL for Mianserin hydrochloride (M-HCl) drug at the given optimum conditions. Unlike GC and HPLC procedures, the spectrophotometer is relatively simple to handle and affordable. The proposed method is simple, precise, accurate and convenient. Hence, the proposed methods should be useful for routine quality control purposes.
REFERENCES:
- Parfitt K: "Martindale, the Extra pharmacopoeia", The Pharmaceutical Press, London, 32nd ed. (1999).
- Han IU, Aman T, Kazi AA and Khan ZA: Spectrophotometric determination of mianserin in pure and pharmaceutical preparations, J. Chem. Soc. Pak., 2002; 24:114-118.
- Devani MB, Pandya SS and Shah SA: Spectrophotometric determinations of mianserin hydrochloride with -3-methyl-2- benzothiazolinone hydrozone, J. Pharm. Sci., 1990; 52:123-124.
- Guneri T and Ozer O: Stability and determination of mianserin hydrochloride, Acta. Pharm. Turc., 1988; 30: 111-114.
- Hefnawy MM, Aboul-Enein HY: Fast high performance liquid chromatographic analysis of mianserin and its metabolites in human plasma using monolithic silica column and solid-phase extraction, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2004; 504:291-297.
- Sun LL, Si TM, Shu LA, Zhang HY and Tian CH: HPLC determination of mianserin in human plasma, Zhongguo-Xinyao-Zazhi, 2002; 11:714-716.
- Kurata K, Kurachi M and Tanii: High performance liquid chromatographic determination of mianserin in plasma and brain and its application to pharmacokinetic studies in the rat, J. Chromatogr. Biomed. Appl., 1988; 78: 278-282.
- Andersen S, Halvorsen TG, Pedersen S and Rasmussen KE: Liquid-phase micro-extraction combined with capillary electrophoresis, a promising tool for the determination of chiral drugs in biological matrices, J. Chromatogr., 2002; 963:303-312.
- Wang F and Khaledi MG: Capillary electrophoresis chiral separation of basic pharmaceutical enantiomers with different charges using sulfated beta-cyclodextrin, Journal of Microcolumn Separations, 1999; 11: 11-21.
- Kalaichelvi1 R, Fatima Rose M, Vadivel K and Jayachandran E: Simple extractive colorimetric determination of pantoprazole sodium by Acid-dye complexation method in solid dosage form, Int. J. Chem. Res., 2010; 1:6-8.
- Massoud A, Mohadeseh Z, Mohammad K R, Shahrooz S And Abbas K: Extractive Spectrophotometric Method for Determination of Pioglitazone Hydrochloride in Raw Material and Tablets Using Ion-Pair Formation, E-Journal of Chemistry, 2010; 7(3): 915-921.
- Jalali, Fahimeh R, Mohammad J: Extractive Spectrophotometric Determination of Fluconazole by Ion-pair Complex Formation with Bromocresol Green, Chinese J. of Chemistry, 2007; 25: 1300-130
- Prajapati PB, Bodiwala KB, Marolia BP, Rathod IS, Shah SA: Development and Validation of Extractive spectrophotometric method for determination of Rosuvastatin calcium in pharmaceutical dosage forms, of Pharmacy Research, 2010; 3(8):2036-2038.
- Sevgi TU: Extractive Spectrophotometric Determination of Cetirizine Dihydrochloride in Pure and Pharmaceutical Preparations, J. of food and drug analysis 2010; 18(6):440-446.
- Yoe JH and Jones JL: Ind. Calorimetric determination of iron with disodium 1, 2-dihydroxy benzene 3, 5-disulphonate Ind. Eng. Chem. (Anal. Ed.) 1994; 16, 111-115.
- Job P: Camp. Rend. (Paris), 1925; 180: pp. 928.
- Sandell EB: Colorimetric determination of traces of metals, 3rd edition, Interscience, New York 1965.
- United States Pharmacopeia, Twentieth Review, the National Formulary, Nineteenth Review, the United States Pharmacopoeial Convention, Rockville, MD, 2000.
Miller JC, Miller JN: Significance Tests in Statistics for Analytical Chemistry, 3rd ed., Chap. 3, Ellis Hardwood, Chichester, UK, 1993
Article Information
14
1197-1203
642
1223
English
Ijpsr
R. S. Farag , M. S. Afifi and M. M. Abd-Rabow*
Forensic chemist, Chemical Laboratory of Medico-Legal Department, Ministry of Justice, Cairo, Egypt
26 January, 2011
16 March, 2011
06 April, 2011
http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.2(5).1197-03
01 May, 2011