FORMULATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF CURCUMIN AND MAG LOADED ENTERIC COATED TABLET IN THE TREATMENT OF IBD
HTML Full TextFORMULATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF CURCUMIN AND MAG LOADED ENTERIC COATED TABLET IN THE TREATMENT OF IBD
Shrikant Rajaram Divekar * and Vaibhav R. Vaidya
Department of Pharmaceutics, Dr. D. Y. Patil College of Pharmacy, Akurdi, Pune - 411044, Maharashtra, India.
ABSTRACT: The incidence of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is now rising in developing countries and increasingly considered an emerging global disease. IBD is a chronic, intermittent disease. Symptoms of IBD varies from person to person and segment of the intestinal tract involved. IBD diagnosis depends on the various test, which requires blood testing, stool testing, endoscopy, biopsies as well as physical examination with patient history study. The most common side effects of antibiotics in the treatment of IBD are killing microflora with bacteria; hence it makes the condition worst rather than curing. Curcumin has many pharmacological such as anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative stress, and anti-catabolic activity, which play an important role in mitigating in CD and UC in IBD. Monoammonium glycyrrhizinate (MAG) was recognized as a compound possessing antimicrobial properties, MAG tested many researchers using the agar diffusion method, which shows significant antibacterial activities against gram-positive (Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus) as well as gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa), MAG also decrease the permeability of intestine in IBD which inhibit autoimmune attack. This present study focuses on treating the IBD without disturbing the microflora in an effective way. Thus, the formulating enteric coating drug delivery system containing Curcumin and MAG in combination with local action for healing IBD is possible. This facilitates drug release at the disease location, which gives maximum therapeutic effect and treat IBD with more efficiently.
Keywords: |
IBD, Curcumin, Monoammonium Glycyrrhizinate, Enteric Coating
INTRODUCTION: The word “enteric” indicates a small intestine; thus, enteric coatings avoid dissolution and release of medication before it reaches the small intestine. Most enteric coatings work by presenting a coated surface that's stable at the extremely acidic pH scale found within the abdomen, however, breaks down quickly at a less acidic (relatively more basic) pH 1-6.
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is mainly the chronic inflammation of the intestine Fig. 1. IBD is divided into two main classes, Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). Both UC and CD have the same symptoms with the difference in location of intestine Fig. 2. IBD has similar symptoms and leads to GI disorders and inflammation in the digestive system. The actual reason for IBD is still unknown 7-8.
There is a number of reason and factor which contribute in CD and UC, some such as inappro-priate diet, genetics, medication, inappropriate immune response, geographical location, environmental condition, and many more.
Common Symptoms of CD and UC involve Diarrhea, Abdominal Pain, Rectal Bleeding, Weight Loss.CD and UC mainly develop in youngsters and adults, developing ratio of CD and UC equal in men and women. In CD and UC lots of similarity but in difference in their symptoms 9-16.
Curcumin has many activities such as anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative stress, and anti-catabolic activity 17. Monoammonium glycyrrhizinate was recognized as a compound possessing antimicrobial properties, antibacterial activities against gram-positive it also inhibits autoimmune attack of immunity and decreases the permeability of the intestine in IBD 18. A combination of Curcumin and MAG effective for IBD focuses on treating the IBD without disturbing the microflora in an effective way.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Materials: Drugs:
- Curcumin was obtained as a gift sample from Oliviya Organics Pvt. Ltd. Chennai, Tamil Nadu,
- Monoammonium glycyrrhizinate was obtained as a gift sample from Amsar Pvt. Ltd. Indore, Madhya Pradesh,
Chemicals: Lactose, PVP K-30, Magnesium Stearate, Talc, Eudragit L-100, PEG-400.
Solvents: -Ethanol, Isopropyl Alcohol.
Method:
Preformulation Studies: 1-4, 17-18 The aim of preformulation studies are follow:
- To check the physiochemical characterization of a new drug.
- To establish compatibility with different excipients.
Description: The sample was evaluated visually for appearance, color, odor.
Formulation Compatibility Study by using IR:
IR Spectrum of Individual Drug: The drug and potassium bromide disk were prepared manually and separately for each drug by press method. Potassium bromide was used as a blank while running spectrum.
Drug-Drug Compatibility Study: The physical mixture of both drugs (Curcumin + MAG)was prepared in 1:1 ratio. The sample was kept at 38 °C for 45 days and was analyzed for any interaction of drugs.
Drug - Excipients Compatibility Study: The physical mixture of both drug (Curcumin + MAG) with excipients was prepared in 1:1 ratio. The sample was kept at 38 °C for 45 days and was analyzed for any interaction of drugs and excipients.
UV-Visible Spectroscopy:
Calibration curve of Curcumin:
Preparation Stock Solution of Curcumin: (Ethanol AR): 10mg pure curcumin was dissolved in 100 ml ethanol to get a 100ug/ml stock solution. Prepare dilutions of 0.5μg/ml, 1μg/ml, 2μg/ml, 3μg/ml, 4μg/ml, and 5μg/ml respectively. Then measured absorbance of prepared dilutions at the respective wavelength.
Preparation Stock Solution of Curcumin: (In 0.1N HCl): 10mg pure curcumin was dissolved in 10 ml ethanol, then volume makeup up to 100 ml with 0.1N HCl, to get a 100ug/ml stock solution. Prepare dilutions of 0.5μg/ml, 1μg/ml, 2μg/ml, 3μg/ml, 4μg/ml, and 5μg/ml respectively. Then measured absorbance of prepared dilutions at the respective wavelength.
Preparation Stock Solution of Curcumin: (In pH 6.8 Phosphate Buffer): 10mg pure curcumin was dissolved in 10 ml ethanol, then volume makeup up to 100 ml with pH 6.8 Phosphate Buffer, to get a 100ug/ml stock solution. Prepare dilutions of 0.5μg/ml, 1μg/ml, 2μg/ml, 3μg/ml, 4μg/ml, and 5μg/ml respectively. Then measured absorbance of prepared dilutions at the respective wavelength.
Preparation Stock Solution of Monoammonium glycyrrhizinate:
Preparation Stock Solution of Monoammonium glycyrrhizinate: (Ethanol AR): 10mg pure MAG was dissolved in 100 ml ethanol to get a 100ug/ml stock solution. Prepared dilutions of 5μg/ml, 10μg/ml, 15μg/ml, 20μg/ml, 25μg/ml, 30μg/ml, 35μg/ml and 40μg/ml respectively. Then measured absorbance of prepared dilutions at the respective wavelength.
Preparation Stock Solution of MAG: (In 0.1N HCl): 10mg pure drug of MAG was dissolved in 10 ml ethanol, then makeup volume up to 100 ml with 0.1N HCl, to get a 100ug/ml stock solution. Prepare dilutions of 5μg/ml, 10μg/ml, 15μg/ml, 20μg/ml, 25μg/ml and 30μg/ml respectively. Then measured absorbance of prepared dilutions at respective wavelength.
Preparation Stock Solution of MAG: (In pH 6.8 Phosphate Buffer): 10mg pure drug of MAG was dissolved in 10 ml ethanol, then volume makeup upto 100 ml with pH 6.8 phosphate buffer, to get a 100ug/ml stock solution. Prepare dilutions of 5μg/ml, 10μg/ml, 15μg/ml, 20μg/ml, 25μg/ml, 30μg/ml 35μg/ml and 40μg/ml respectively. Then measured absorbance of prepared dilutions at the respective wavelength.
Formulation Design:
Formulation of Core Tablet by Different Concentrations of Binder (PVP 0.5% - 5%):
Procedure for Formulation of Core Tablet: 19-22 Prepare core tablet with different concentrations of binder solution. PVP in the range of 0.5-5%, granules were prepared by the wet granulation method. Tablets prepared by direct compression method with 8mm punch. Each resultant tablet weight was 210mg.
Formulation Design of Core Tablet (F1-F4):
TABLE 1: FORMULATION TABLE OF CORE TABLET WITH DIFFERENT CONC. BINDER SOLUTION
Formulation | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 |
Curcumin | 100mg | 100mg | 100mg | 100mg |
Monoammonium glycyrrhizinate | 5mg | 5mg | 5mg | 5mg |
Lactose | 100mg | 100mg | 100mg | 100mg |
PVP in IPA | 0.5% | 1.0% | 3.0% | 5.0% |
Magnesium Stearate | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
Talc | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
Evaluation of Core Tablet:
- Thickness and Diameter test.
- Hardness test.
- Friability test.
- Weight variation test.
- Disintegration Test
Finalization of Core Tablet: Finalization of the Core tablet batch depends on the evaluation of all four (F1-F4) batches. From evaluation parameters that batch fulfill all parameters, this batch selected for the Coating.
Formulation of Finalized Batch of Core Tablet (0.5% PVP): 22-23 For core tablet granules prepared by wet granulation method in this 0.5% PVP in IPA use as a binder. Tablets prepared by direct compression method with 8mm punch. Each resultant tablet weight was 210mg.
Formulation Table of Core Tablet (F1):
TABLE 2: FORMULATION TABLE OF SELECTED CORE TABLET (0.5% BINDER SOLUTION)
Formulation | F1 |
Curcumin | 100mg |
Monoammonium glycyrrhizinate | 5mg |
Lactose | 100mg |
PVP in IPA | 0.5% |
Magnesium Stearate | 1% |
Talc | 1% |
Pre-Compression Evaluation Parameters of Selected (0.5% PVP Binder Solution) Tablet: 26-28 In Pre-compression evaluation angle of repose, bulk density and tapped density, carr’s index, hausner’s ratio evaluated.
Post-Compression Evaluation Parameters of Selected (0.5% PVP Binder Solution) Tablet: 28-29 In post-compression evaluation, thickness and diameter test, hardness test, friability test, weight variation test, disintegration test evaluated
Coating of Tablet:
Preparation of Enteric Coating Solution: 30 In enteric coating solution Eudragit L100 is used as enteric-coated polymer, PEG 400 used as a plasticizer, and Ethanol used as a solvent. The enteric coating solution was prepared with constant stirring on a Magnetic stirrer at 400 RPM.
Optimization of Enteric Coating Solution: 31
TABLE 3: OPTIMIZING DESIGN VALUES OF EUDRAGIT L100 & PEG 400
Factor | Eudragit L100 | PEG 400 | ||||
Coded level | -1 | 0 | +1 | -1 | 0 | +1 |
Actual level | 6% | 7% | 8% | 0.5% | 1% | 1.5% |
Coating of Tablet in Enteric Coating Solution: 20-22, 32 For coating of tablet dipping method was used. Coated tablets were dried at 35 °C for 12 h.
TABLE 4: FORMULATION TABLE OF ENTERIC COATED SOLUTION
Batch | Concentration in Percentage | |
Eudragit L 100 | PEG 400 | |
F1 | 7 | 1 |
F2 | 7 | 0.292893 |
F3 | 7 | 1.70711 |
F4 | 8 | 1.5 |
F5 | 8 | 0.5 |
F6 | 8.41421 | 1 |
F7 | 6 | 0.5 |
F8 | 6 | 1.5 |
F9 | 5.58579 | 1 |
Evaluation of Enteric Coated Tablet: 32-35
- Thickness and Diameter test.
- Hardness test.
- Friability test.
- Weight variation test.
- Disintegration Test
- In-vitro drug release studies.
- Stability Testing
RESULTS: Physical Properties of Drug:
TABLE 5: APPEARANCE OF CURCUMIN AND MONOAMMONIUM GLYCYRRHIZINATE
Physiochemical properties | Curcumin | MAG | ||
Reported | Observed | Reported | Observed | |
Appearance | Light yellowish-orange color powder with a characteristic odor. | Bright yellow-orange powder with a characteristic odor | White powder with a characteristic odor. | White powder with a pleasant odour. |
Formulation Compatibility Study by using IR:
IR Spectra of Curcumin:
FIG. 3: IR SPECTRA OF CURCUMIN
IR Spectra of MAG:
FIG. 4: IR SPECTRA OF MAG
Drug-Drug Compatibility Study: The FTIR analysis shown no changes in the endothermic peak of the drugs Fig. 5. This study indicated there was no drug-drug incompatibility.
FIG. 5: IR SPECTRA OF CURCUMIN & MAG COMBINATION
Drug Excipients Compatibility Study: The FTIR analysis shown no changes in the endothermic peak of drugs and excipients Fig. 6. This study indicated there was no drug-excipients incompatibility.
FIG. 6: IR SPECTRA OF DRUG (CURCUMIN, MAG) AND EXCIPIENT (LACTOSE + PVP K-30)
Drug Excipient Compatibility of Core Tablet: The FTIR analysis shown no changes in endothermic peak of drugs and excipients in core tablet Fig. 7. This study indicated there was no drug-excipients incompatibility in core tablet.
FIG. 7: IR SPECTRA OF CORE TABLET
Drug Excipient of Enteric Coated Tablet: The FTIR analysis shown no changes in endothermic peak of drugs and excipients in coated tablet Fig. 8. This study indicated there was no drug-excipients incompatibility in the coated tablet.
FIG. 8: IR SPECTRA OF ENTERIC COATED TABLET
UV-visible Spectroscopy:
Summary of Validation Parameter:
TABLE 6: SUMMARY OF VALIDATION PARAMETER OF CURCUMIN AND MAG IN ETHANOL
S. no. | Parameter | Result of Curcumin | Result of MAG |
1 | Absorption maxima (ƛmax) | 423nm | 248nm |
2 | Linearity Range (µg/ml) | 0.5-5 | 5-40 |
3 | Correlation Coefficient (R2) | 0.9988 | 0.9985 |
4 | Standard regression equation | y = 0.133x + 0.0146 | y = 0.0141x - 0.0009 |
5 | Intercept | 0.0146 | 0.0009 |
6 | Slope | 0.133 | 0.0141 |
TABLE 7: SUMMARY OF VALIDATION PARAMETER OF CURCUMIN AND MAG IN 0.1N HCl
S. no. | Parameter | Result of Curcumin | Result of MAG |
1 | Absorption maxima (ƛmax) | 421nm | 246nm |
2 | Linearity Range (µg/ml) | 0.5-5 | 5-30 |
3 | Correlation Coefficient (R2) | 0.9994 | R² = 0.997 |
4 | Standard regression equation | y = 0.1203x - 0.0043 | y = 0.0123x - 0.009 |
5 | Intercept | 0.0043 | 0.009 |
6 | Slope | 0.1203 | 0.0123 |
TABLE 8: SUMMARY OF VALIDATION PARAMETER OF CURCUMIN AND MAG IN pH 6.8 PHOSPHATE BUFFER
S. no. | Parameter | Result of Curcumin | Result of MAG |
1 | Absorption maxima (ƛmax) | 424nm | 249nm |
2 | Linearity Range (µg/ml) | 0.5-5 | 5-40 |
3 | Correlation Coefficient (R2) | 0.9987 | 0.9978 |
4 | Standard regression equation | y = 0.1231x + 0.0077 | y = 0.0131x - 0.0036 |
5 | Intercept | 0.0077 | 0.0036 |
6 | Slope | 0.1231 | 0.0131 |
Formulation Evaluation:
Evaluation of Core Tablet [Different Concentrations of Binder (PVP 0.5% - 5%)]
Thickness, Diameter, Hardness:
TABLE 9: EVALUATION TABLE OF CORE TABLET CONTAINING DIFFERENT CONC. OF POLYMER
Formulation Number | Thickness (mm) | Diameter (mm) | Hardness (kg/cm2) |
F1 | 3.756±0.024 | 8.013±0.0067 | 4.58±0.25 |
F2 | 3.73±0.010 | 8.03±0.02 | 6.85±0.15 |
F3 | 3.70±0.030 | 8.02±0.01 | 8.33±0.17 |
F4 | 3.723±0.043 | 8.02±0.01 | 9.55±10 |
Friability, Weight Variation, Disintegration:
TABLE 10: EVALUATION TABLE OF CORE TABLET CONTAINING DIFFERENT CONC. OF POLYMER
Formulation Number | Friability in Percentage | Avg. Weight Variation (mg) | Disintegration
(min) |
F1 | 0.22±0.012 | 211.18±1.68 | 5.21±0.09 |
F2 | 0.29±0.023 | 212.61±2.79 | 8.08±0.07 |
F3 | 0.18±0.018 | 212.125±1.375 | 12.16±0.14 |
F4 | 0.19±0.010 | 212.69±0.71 | 17.30±0.15 |
Finalization of Core Tablet Batch for Coating: Selection of the final batch depends on various evaluation parameters e.g. Thickness, Diameter, Hardness, Friability, Weight Variation and Disintegration Time. After evaluation of above parameters, we selected “F1” formulation (which contain 0.5% PVP), which shown ideal property for core tablet.
Pre-Compression Evaluation Parameters of Selected (0.5% PVP Binder Solution) Tablet:
TABLE 11: PRE-COMPRESSION EVALUATION OF SELECTED CORE TABLET
S. no. | Parameter | Result |
1 | Bulk Density | 0.6896 gm/ml |
2 | Tap Density | 0.7633 gm/ml |
3 | Carr’s Index | 9.655 % |
4 | Hausner Ratio | 1.10 gm/ml |
5 | Angle of Repose | 27.020 |
Post-Compression Evaluation Parameters of Selected (0.5% PVP Binder Solution) Tablet:
TABLE 12: POST-COMPRESSION EVALUATION OF SELECTED CORE TABLET
S. no. | Parameter | Result |
1 | Thickness | 3.749±0.019 (mm) |
2 | Diameter | 8.008±0.012 (mm) |
3 | Hardness | 4.51±0.26 (kg/cm2) |
4 | Friability | 0.1859±0.20 % |
5 | Avg. Weight Variation Test | 210.42±1.92 (mg) |
6 | Disintegration Test | 4.533±0.383 (min.) |
Evaluation of Enteric Coated Tablet:
Thickness, Diameter and Hardness:
TABLE 13: ENTERIC COATED TABLET EVALUATION (THICKNESS, DIAMETER, HARDNESS)
Formulation | Thickness
(in mm) |
Diameter in (mm) | Hardness (kg/cm2) |
F1 | 3.808±0.012 | 8.112±0.0119 | 4.57±0.32 |
F2 | 3.794±0.016 | 8.09±0.0099 | 4.61±0.36 |
F3 | 3.824±0.0159 | 8.118±0.012 | 4.5±0.25 |
F4 | 3.832±0.0180 | 8.124±0.006 | 4.62±0.13 |
F5 | 3.798±0.0179 | 8.094±0.016 | 4.55±0.3 |
F6 | 3.82±0.020 | 8.118±0.028 | 4.45±0.3 |
F7 | 3.78±0.010 | 8.08±0.01 | 4.5±0.25 |
F8 | 3.804±0.0139 | 8.114±0.006 | 4.55±0.3 |
F9 | 3.798±0.0219 | 8.11±0.0099 | 4.55±0.3 |
Friability, Weight Variation:
TABLE 14: ENTERIC COATED TABLET EVALUATION (FRIABILITY, AVG. WT. VARIATION)
Formulation | Friability in Percentage | Avg. Weight Variation (mg) |
F1 | 0.213±0.037 | 213.44±1.24 |
F2 | 0.212±0.031 | 213.33±1.53 |
F3 | 0.288±0.048 | 214.65±1.65 |
F4 | 0.272±0.015 | 215.43±2.53 |
F5 | 0.173±0.049 | 214.91±1.289 |
F6 | 0.289±0.0042 | 214.36±1.740 |
F7 | 0.305±0.036 | 213.62±1.080 |
F8 | 0.283±0.040 | 214.32±1.080 |
F9 | 0.304±0.053 | 213.35±1.349 |
Disintegration Time:
TABLE 15: ENTERIC COATED TABLET EVALUATION (DISINTEGRATION OF ENTERIC COATED TABLET)
Formulation Number | Time in Min (Total -180 min)
120 minu in 0.1N HCl + 60 min in 6.8 phosphate buffer |
|
Initially, 0.1N HCl (for 120 min) | Phosphate Buffer 6.8 (for 60 min.) | |
F1 | Not Dissolve | 28 |
F2 | 69 min | - |
F3 | Not Dissolve | 38 |
F4 | Not Dissolve | 47 |
F5 | 83 min | - |
F6 | Not Dissolve | 58 |
F7 | 76 min | - |
F8 | Not Dissolve | 34 |
F9 | Not Dissolve | 24 |
In-vitro Drug Release Studies of Enteric Coated Tablets:
% Drug Release of Curcumin:
TABLE 16: % DRUG RELEASE OF CURCUMIN FROM DIFFERENT FORMULATION ENTERIC COATED TABLETS
Time in min | Formulation Number | ||||||||
F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 | F9 | |
30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
90 | 0 | 2.24 | 0 | 0 | 1.24 | 0 | 1.68 | 0 | 0 |
120 | 0 | 7.09 | 0 | 0 | 5.41 | 0 | 5.34 | 0 | 0 |
150 | 1.58 | 31.97 | 0.9 | 0.39 | 28.73 | 1.486 | 30.32 | 1.19 | 8.77 |
180 | 9.09 | 97.70 | 3.6 | 1.46 | 91.24 | 5.70 | 94.97 | 6.21 | 34.45 |
240 | 32.97 | 12.2 | 4.48 | 13.40 | 30.76 | 97.35 | |||
300 | 99.30 | 28.0 | 9.65 | 28.05 | 92.32 | ||||
360 | 51.8 | 37.53 | 47.27 | ||||||
420 | 98.9 | 95.00 | 92.51 |
GRAPH 1: % DRUG RELEASE OF CURCUMIN FROM DIFFERENT FORMULATION ENTERIC COATED TABLETS
% Drug Release of MAG:
TABLE 17: % DRUG RELEASE OF MAG FROM DIFFERENT FORMULATION ENTERIC COATED TABLETS
Time in min | Formulation Number | ||||||||
F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 | F9 | |
30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
90 | 0 | 6.87 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
120 | 0 | 18.42 | 0 | 0 | 12.02 | 0 | 12.70 | 0 | 0 |
150 | 6.87 | 45.85 | 0 | 0 | 39.25 | 0 | 40.19 | 8.93 | 12.70 |
180 | 21.64 | 100.30 | 6.87 | 0 | 94.46 | 6.87 | 95.15 | 22.67 | 47.06 |
240 | 49.12 | 14.42 | 5.29 | 17.17 | 51.18 | 95.15 | |||
300 | 98.96 | 28.86 | 12.16 | 34.35 | 92.40 | ||||
360 | 49.46 | 43.07 | 56.67 | ||||||
420 | 99.61 | 97.69 | 92.06 |
GRAPH 2: %DRUG RELEASE OF MAG FROM DIFFERENT FORMULATION ENTERIC COATED TABLETS
Optimization Data for Drug Dissolution:
Response 1: Curcumin Drug Release after 2 h:
FIG. 9: 3D & 2D PLOT FOR THE EFFECT OF CONCENTRATION OF EUDRAGIT AND PLASTICIZER ON DRUG RELEASE OF CURCUMIN AFTER 2 h
Response 2: Curcumin Drug Release within 5 h:
FIG. 10: 3D & 2D PLOT FOR EFFECT OF CONCENTRATION OF EUDRAGIT AND PLASTICIZER ON DRUG RELEASE OF CURCUMIN WITHIN 5 h
Response 3: MAG Drug Release after 2 h:
FIG. 11: 3D & 2D PLOT FOR EFFECT OF CONCENTRATION OF EUDRAGIT AND PLASTICIZER ON DRUG RELEASE OF MAG AFTER 2 h
Response 4: MAG Drug Release within 5 h:
FIG. 12: 3D & 2D PLOT FOR EFFECT OF CONCENTRATION OF EUDRAGIT AND PLASTICIZER ON DRUG RELEASE OF MAG WITHIN 5 h
Hardness of Tablet:
TABLE 18: HARDNESS OF ENTERIC COATED TABLET WITH A DIFFERENT TIME INTERVAL
Time Interval | Hardness in (kg/cm2) |
Initial | 4.57±0.32 |
1 Month | 4.71±0.29 |
2 Month | 4.6±0.40 |
3 Month | 4.65±0.15 |
6 Month | 4.50±0.25 |
Stability Testing: From the evaluation of all batches of enteric-coated tablets, “F1” formulation was found better results compared to other formulation. So for the stability study of the enteric-coated tablet, “F1” formulation selected and carried out as per ICH guideline for 6 months (30 °C ±2 °C, RH 65% ± 5%).
Dissolution Study: For stability testing, dissolution carried with a selected time interval (1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months) % Drug Release of Curcumin shown in Table 19 & Graph 3, % Drug Release of MAG shown in Table 20 & Graph 4 with a different time interval (1 month, 2 months, 3 month and 6 months).
%Drug Release of Curcumin with a Different Time Interval:
TABLE 19: % DRUG RELEASE OF CURCUMIN FROM ENTERIC COATED TABLET WITH DIFF. TIME INTERVAL
Time (in min) | % w/w drug dissolved (Curcumin) | ||||
Initial | 1 Month | 2 Month | 3 Month | 6 Month | |
30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
150 | 1.05 | 1.828 | 1.413 | 1.535 | 1.3891 |
180 | 9.09 | 7.384 | 7.213 | 6.361 | 13.526 |
240 | 32.97 | 33.704 | 33.619 | 29.025 | 36.19 |
300 | 99.34 | 99.578 | 99.618 | 100 | 98.355 |
GRAPH 3: %DRUG RELEASE OF CURCUMIN FROM ENTERIC COATED TABLET WITH DIFF. TIME INTERVAL
% Drug Release of MAG with a Different Time Interval:
TABLE 20: %DRUG RELEASE OF MAG FROM ENTERIC COATED TABLET WITH A DIFFERENT TIME INTERVAL
Time (in min) | % w/w drug dissolved (Curcumin) | ||||
Initial | 1 Month | 2 Month | 3 Month | 6 Month | |
30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
150 | 6.17 | 6.47 | 6.05 | 5.83 | 6.87 |
180 | 21.315 | 22.672 | 23.18 | 20.611 | 21.6415 |
240 | 49.1225 | 50.153 | 50.192 | 48.092 | 51.1225 |
300 | 98.9625 | 99.681 | 100 | 98.244 | 97.9625 |
GRAPH 4: %DRUG RELEASE OF MAG FROM ENTERIC COATED TABLET WITH A DIFFERENT TIME INTERVAL
Drug Recovery:
TABLE 21: DRUG RATIO RECOVERY FROM ENTERIC COATED TABLET WITH A DIFFERENT TIME INTERVAL
Time
Interval |
MAG: Curcumin
(in ml) |
Conc. (in µg/ml) | Recovered conc. (in µg/ml) | % Recovery | |||
MAG | Curcumin | MAG | Curcumin | MAG | Curcumin | ||
Initial | 0.05:1 ml | 0.5 | 10 | 0.488 | 9.794 | 97.600 | 97.935 |
0.1:2ml | 1 | 20 | 0.979 | 19.827 | 97.900 | 99.136 | |
0.15:3ml | 1.5 | 30 | 1.505 | 29.134 | 100.333 | 97.115 | |
1
Month |
0.05:1 ml | 0.5 | 10 | 0.502 | 9.911 | 100.400 | 99.110 |
0.1:2ml | 1 | 20 | 0.996 | 19.890 | 99.600 | 99.450 | |
0.15:3ml | 1.5 | 30 | 1.491 | 29.121 | 99.400 | 97.070 | |
2
Month |
0.05:1 ml | 0.5 | 10 | 0.494 | 9.990 | 98.800 | 99.900 |
0.1:2ml | 1 | 20 | 0.981 | 20.020 | 98.100 | 100.100 | |
0.15:3ml | 1.5 | 30 | 1.480 | 29.970 | 98.667 | 99.900 | |
3
Month |
0.05:1 ml | 0.5 | 10 | 0.501 | 9.880 | 100.200 | 98.800 |
0.1:2ml | 1 | 20 | 1.011 | 19.920 | 101.100 | 99.600 | |
0.15:3ml | 1.5 | 30 | 1.511 | 30.020 | 100.733 | 100.067 | |
6
Month |
0.05:1 ml | 0.5 | 10 | 0.478 | 9.794 | 95.532 | 97.935 |
0.1:2ml | 1 | 20 | 0.924 | 19.827 | 92.370 | 99.136 | |
0.15:3ml | 1.5 | 30 | 1.460 | 28.912 | 97.305 | 96.373 |
SUMMARY: In Preformulation study identification of Curcumin and MAG was done. Characterization of FTIR peaks shows all functional groups of Curcumin and MAG. FTIR data confirm that there was no chemical interaction of the drugs with the other excipient used in the formulation. Calibration curve of Curcumin and MAG was performed in 0.1N HCl, Phosphate Buffer pH 6.8 which can be used for drug quantification in dissolution analysis.
Formulation of Core tablets prepared by using different concentration of binder solution and finalization based upon evaluation parameter. Finalized selected batch reproduced for coating. Pre-compression evaluation of core tablet involved (bulk density, tap density, carr’s index, hausner's ratio, angle of repose). Post-compression evaluation of core tablet involved (thickness, diameter, hardness, avg. weight variation, friability, disintegration time). Performed enteric coating of a Finalized batch by dipping method with different optimized polymer and plasticizer solution.
Evaluation of enteric coated tablets involved (thickness, diameter, hardness, weight variation, friability, disintegration time, drug release). In optimization of an enteric coated tablets, F1 formulation was found better results compared to other formulation.
Stability study of enteric coated tablet F1 formulation selected and carried out as per ICH guideline for 6 months (30 °C ± 2 °C, RH 65% ± 5%). This study shows F1 formulation was stable. For stability study, hardness, drug release, drug recovery was performed. All parameter shows formulation was stable.
CONCLUSION: The present study of curcumin and Monoammonium glycyrrhizinate enteric-coated drug delivery system avoid drugs release in a gastric fluid, which minimizes curcumin degradation and directly releaseboth drugs in the intestine to treat Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s diseases.
The combination of curcumin and MAG would be treating Inflammatory Bowel Disease more effectively due to its drug release directly at the site of action, which gives more benefits in future Inflammatory Bowel Disease management.
Advantages of curcumin and MAG combinational drug therapy doesn’t have any serious side effect after for prolonged use, which is the main important perspective of this therapy make effective than others.
Curcumin and MAG not only effective in IBD management, but they may be proven effective in Hepatitis, Liver Cirrhosis, skin infection, Rheumatic Arthritis, antibacterial, and other many diseases due to its vast pharmacological activity.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: I would like to express thanks to the “International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research” for supporting us at every point and provide such a huge platform where we can publish our paper. I would also like to express thanks to the Manager of Oliviya Organics Pvt. Ltd. for providing me a gift sample of Curcumin and The Manager of Amsar Pvt. Ltd. for providing me a gift sample of Monoammonium glycyrrhizinate for my research work. I would also like to thanks my project guide Dr. Vaibhav R. Vaidya, for helping me at every point of my project work.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: The author reports no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES:
- Aulton M: Pharmaceutics: The Science of Dosage Form Design. International Student Edition; Oct 2001; 304-21, 347-668.
- Lachman L, Lieberman HA and Joseph LK: The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy. Varghese Publishing House, Mumbai, Third Edition 1986; 297-321.
- Kovacevic J, Mladenovic A, Djuris J and Ibric S: Evaluation of powder, solution and suspension layering for the preparation of enteric-coated pellets. Europian Journal of Pharmaceutical Science; March 2016; 85: 84-93.
- Ansel H, Allen L and Popovich N: Ansel’s Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Drug Delivery Systems; Eleventh Edition 2009; 227-59.
- Yus C, Gracia R and Larrea A: Targeted Release of Probiotics from Enteric Microparticulated Formulations. Polymers (Basel) 2019; 11(10): 1668.
- Chen K, Chang HHR and Shalviri A: Investigation of a new pH-responsive nanoparticulate pore former for controlled release enteric coating with improved processability and stability. Eururopian Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 2017; 120: 116-25.
- Maderuelo C, Lanao JM and Zarzuelo A: Enteric coating of oral solid dosage forms as a tool to improve drug bioavailability; European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2019; 138: 105019.
- Keller DS, Windsor A, Cohen R and Chand M: Colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: review of the evidence. Techniques in Coloproctology 2019; 23(1): 3-13.
- Flynn S and Eisenstein S: Inflammatory Bowel Disease Presentation and Diagnosis; Surgical Clinics of North America 2019; 99(6): 1051-62.
- Nahida T, Mariya H and Hussain NI: Natural treatment for inflammatory bowel disease. British Biomedical Bulletin; 2014; 01-10
- Dale L and Suskind D: A review of dietary therapy for IBD and a vision for the future, Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2019; 11: 947-59.
- Clara A and Judy H: Mechanism of disease inflammatory bowel disease. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2019; 361: 2066-78.
- Nokhostin F: A review of the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment methods of inflammatory bowel disease, Journal of Medicine and Life 2019; 12(2): 113-22.
- Oligschlaeger Y, Tom H and Yadati T: Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Stressed “Gut/Feeling”- Review, MDIP Journal 2019; 8: 659-85.
- Kotha RR and Luthria DL: Curcumin: Biological, pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and analytical aspects. Molecules 2019; 24(16): 2930.
- Bayati ZJ and Moradi KZ; Licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra) as a valuable medicinal plant. International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research 2013; 1: 1281-88.
- Vasant HV and Deepika RN: Development and validation of uv spectrophotometric method for the estimation of curcumin in bulk and pharmaceutical formulation. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2015; 4(05): 1456-63.
- Patil S, Salunkhe V and Mohite S: Development and validation of UV spectrophotometric method for estimation of glycyrrhetinic acid in hydroalcoholic extract of Glycyrrhiza glabra. International Journal of Pharmaceutical, Chemical and Biological Sciences 2012; 2(4): 617-21.
- Tribedi S, Anantapur M and Mathappan R:Formulation and evaluation of enteric coated tablet pantoprazole; International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Chemical Sciences 2014; 2: 110-28
- Alsulays BB, Kulkarni V and Alshehri SM: Preparation and evaluation of enteric coated tablets of hot-melt extruded lansoprazole. Drug Development and industrial Pharmacy 2017; 43(5): 789-96.
- Xin-mei P, Jie L, Run G and Xiang-nan H: Preparation and in-vitro evaluation of enteric-coated tablets of rosiglitazone sodium. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal 2016; 23: 581-86.
- Patel MM: Formulation and development of di-dependent microparticulate system for colon-specific drug delivery. Drug Delivery and Translational Research 2017; 7(2): 312-24.
- Sun ZG, Zhao TT, Lu N, Yang YA and Zhu HL: Research Progress of glycyrrhizic acid on antiviral activity. Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry 2019; 19(10): 826-32.
- Shekar S, Chandrashekhar R and Bhagawan C: Study of identification and assessment of drug-drug interactions. J of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sci 2014; 3: 1373-78.
- Chadha R and Bhandari S: Drug-excipient compatibility screening--role of thermoanalytical and spectroscopic techniques. Journal of Pharmaceutical Biomedical Analysis 2014; 87: 82-97.
- Gobinath T, Venkatachalam K and Ramanathan S: Formulation and evaluation of enteric coated tablets of Pantoprazole. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2014; 7: 176-84.
- Haritha B: A review on evaluation of tablets. Journal of Formulation Science & Bioavailability 2017; 1: 107-11.
- Indian Pharmacopeia 2010, Indian Pharmacopeia Commission, Volume 1, 186-93.
- Goh HP, Heng PWS and Liew CV: Comparative evaluation of powder flow parameters with reference to particle size and shape. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2018; 547(1-2): 133-41.
- Shah R, Tawakkul M and Khan M: Evaluation of flow for pharmaceutical powders and granules. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 2008; 9: 250-58.
- Islam S, Khatun F, Bakr A and Haque M: A review on biodegradable polymers for enteric coating material. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Research 2016; 6: 141-59.
- Chowdary KPR and Ravi SK: Optimization of pharmaceutical product formulation by factorial designs: case studies. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 2016; 15l 105-10.
- Alsulays BB, Kulkarni V and Alshehri SM: Preparation and evaluation of enteric coated tablets of hot-melt extruded lansoprazole. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2017; 43(5): 789-96.
- Indian Pharmacopeia 2014, Indian Pharmacopeia Commission, Volume 2, 960.
- Stability Testing of Lachman Leon, Physical and Chemical Tablet Dosage Forms. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 1965; 54: 1519-1926.
- International Council for Harmonisation, Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products Q1A(R2), 6 February 2013, 6-13.
How to cite this article:
Divekar SR and Vaidya VR: Formulation and development of curcumin and MAG loaded enteric coated tablet in the treatment of IBD. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2021; 12(2): 1155-67. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.12(2).1155-67.
All © 2013 are reserved by the International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
54
1155-1167
1034
733
English
IJPSR
S. R. Divekar * and V. R. Vaidya
Department of Pharmaceutics, Dr. D. Y. Patil College of Pharmacy, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
shrikantdivekar68@gmail.com
22 February 2020
13 May 2020
10 September 2020
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.12(2).1155-67
01 February 2021