FORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF HYDRALAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE MOUTH DISSOLVING TABLET FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ECLAMPSIA AND PRE-ECLAMPSIA
HTML Full TextFORMULATION AND EVALUATION OF HYDRALAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE MOUTH DISSOLVING TABLET FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ECLAMPSIA AND PRE-ECLAMPSIA
S. Muthu Kumar* and R. Sundara Ganapathy
Faculty of Pharmacy, Karpagam University, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Coimbatore - 641021, Tamil Nadu, India.
ABSTRACT: Eclampsia and Pre-Eclampsia is an acute and life-threatening complication during pregnancy. Hydralazine hydrochloride is one of the drugs of choice in treating this condition. The purpose of the present research work was to formulate the Mouth Dissolving Tablets by using different methods and provide a suitable patient convenience dosage form to enhance the bioavailability and provide quick onset of action. Formulation of MDTs of Hydralazine hydrochloride were prepared by using various superdisintegrants like cross-povidone, cross-carmellose sodium and sodium starch glycolate by direct compression method and camphor as an excipient by sublimation technique. Among all the formulations F9 and SF9 showed effective percentage of drug release at 12 minutes indicating faster and maximum absorption at the site of administration.
Keywords: |
Mouth Dissolving Tablet, Eclampsia, Pre-Eclampsia, Hydralazine Hydrochloride
INTRODUCTION: A novel dosage form for oral administration. When placed in mouth, disintegrates rapidly or dissolves in saliva, within a few seconds. MDTs usually dissolve in oral cavity within 15 seconds to 3 minutes. Formulation is especially designed for Dysphasic, geriatric, paediatric, bed-ridden, during travelling, Psychotic patients, Unable to swallow or refuse to swallow conventional oral formulations 1, 2. Among the oral delivery, tablets is the most popular because of convenience of self administration, compactness and easy manufacturing 3. Sublimation Method has been used to produce MDTs with high porosity by compressing the volatile materials along with other excipients in to tablets,
Which are finally subjected to a process of sublimation. The removal of the volatile materials by heating under vacuum there by porosity is reached due to the formation of many pores. These compressed tablets which have porosity fast dissolved within 15 seconds in saliva 4. Hypertension, complicating 5% to 7% of all pregnancies, is a leading cause of maternal and fetal morbidity, particularly when the elevated blood pressure (BP) is due to preeclampsia 6.
Preeclampsia is a major cause of preterm birth and an early marker for future cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. Pre-eclampsia is a medical condition characterized by high blood pressure and significant amounts of protein in the urine of a pregnant women. If left untreated, it can develop into eclampsia, the life-threatening occurrence of seizers during pregnancy 7, 8. Hydralazine Hydrochloride drugs are suitable and effective for the treatment of hypertension because it’s having a phthalazinone hydrazone hydrochloride chemical group. It has a bioavailability of 30% to 60%, Tmax 1 to 2 hours. Maximum dosing of Hydralazine Hydrochloride is 300 mg / day. It enhances the bioavailability resulting from bypassing the first pass effect 9.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The drug Hydralazine Hydrochloride was obtained from Octopus pharmaceuticals, Chennai. Croscarmalose sodium, Crospovidone, Sodium starch glycolate, Aspartame, Mannitol, Magnesium stearate, Micro crystalline cellulose, Talc, Camphor were procured from Himedia Ltd., Goa and all other excipient used were analytical grade.
Preformulation Studies: Preformulation studies such as physical appearance, solubility, melting point, hygroscopicity and drug excipient compatibility were performed to confirm the suitability and stability of drug and excipient for the formulation of mouth dissolving tablets 10.
Compatibility Studies: IR studies: IR spectra for pure drug and powdered tablets were recorded in Infrared spectrophotometer with KBr pellets 11.
DSC and TGA: Differential scanning calorimeter and Thermo Gravimetric Analysis were performed for drug and the formulated tablets.
Pre-compression Studies: Pre - Compression parameters like Angle of Repose, Bulk density, tapped density, Compressibility index and Hauser ratio were performed as per the standard procedures 12.
Formulation and Development:
Method A:
Formulation of Mouth Dissolving Tablet by Direct Compression Method: Tablets were prepared by direct compression method using super disintegrants such as, crospovidone, croscarmellose sodium and sodium starch glycolate in varying ratios. All the materials were passed through #60 mesh prior to mixing for uniformity in particle size. The drug and microcrystalline cellulose were mixed using glass mortar and pestle in a small portion of both at each time and blended to get a uniform mixture and kept aside. Then the other ingredients were weighed and mixed in a geometrical order and the tablets were compressed using 8mm size punch to get 200 mg weight using ten stations Rimek tablet punching machine. Compositions of different formulations were prepared by direct compression method 13.
Method B:
Preparation of Mouth Dissolving Tablet by Sublimation method: Tablets were prepared by using camphor in different ratios. All the ingredients were passed through #60 mesh separately. Then the ingredients were weighted and mixed in geometrical order and the tablets were compressed using 8mm size punch to get 200 mg weight using ten stations Rimek tablet punching machine.
The compressed tablets were than subjected to sublimation at 60 °C for 1 hour. Compositions of different formulations were prepared by sublimation technique 14.
Evaluation of Hydralazine Hydrochloride Mouth Dissolving Tablets: The compressed tablets were evaluated for the tests such as weight variation, thickness hardness, friability, in vitro disintegration and in vitro dissolution rate as per the pharmacopoeia standards and specific tests for the evaluation of mouth dissolving tablets like wetting time and water absorption ratio were performed 15 - 18.
Stability Studies: Stability studies of the formulated orodispersible tablets were performed as per the ICH guidelines under accelerated condition 40 ± 0.2 °C / 75 ± 5% RH and evaluated for its stability 19.
RESULTS: Hydralazine hydrochloride appeared white, odourless, amorphous, and soluble in water with a melting point of 172 ± 0.1 °C.
The FTIR spectra, DSC and TGA of the drug, polymer and physical mixtures of various formulations were compared with the spectra of pure drug and individual excipient in which there was no significant change in the spectrum was observed in Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Fig. 6 and Fig. 7 indicating the compatibility of the drug and excipients. Also, no extra peaks were observed other than normal peaks in the spectra of the mouth dissolving tablets which confirms the stability of the formulations.
FIG. 1: FTIR SPECTRUM OF HYDRALAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE
FIG. 2: FTIR SPECTRUM OF MDTs PREPARED BY DIRECT COMPRESSION METHOD
FIG. 3: DSC OF MDTs PREPARED BY DIRECT COMPRESSION METHOD
FIG. 4: TGA OF MDTs PREPARED BY DIRECT COMPRESSION METHOD
FIG. 5: FTIR SPECTRUM OF MDTs PREPARED BY SUBLIMATION METHOD
FIG. 6: DSC OF MDTs PREPARED BY SUBLIMATION METHOD
FIG. 7: TGA OF MDTs BY SUBLIMATION METHOD
Pre- Compression Studies:
TABLE 1: DIRECT COMPRESSION METHOD 20
Batch code | Angle of repose (θ) | Bulk Density (g/cm3) | Tapped Density (g/cm3) | Carr’s Index (%) | Hausner’s Ratio |
API | 24.76±0.18 | 0.31±0.06 | 0.34±0.08 | 08.82±0.07 | 1.09±0.02 |
F1 | 37.97±0.16 | 0.33±0.10 | 0.39±0.10 | 15.38±0.06 | 1.18±0.03 |
F2 | 36.02±0.26 | 0.31±0.10 | 0.42±0.08 | 26.19±0.09 | 1.19±0.02 |
F3 | 35.06±0.11 | 0.36±0.05 | 0.40±0.03 | 10.00±0.17 | 1.35±0.01 |
F4 | 34.09±0.13 | 0.34±0.06 | 0.43±0.01 | 21.95±0.68 | 1.18±0.02 |
F5 | 34.64±0.28 | 0.33±0.03 | 0.41±0.03 | 19.51±0.66 | 1.26±0.03 |
F6 | 26.06±0.26 | 0.32±0.05 | 0.39±0.03 | 17.94±0.42 | 1.17±0.01 |
F7 | 34.24±0.33 | 0.32±0.11 | 0.34±0.10 | 05.88±0.08 | 1.21±0.01 |
F8 | 36.96±0.31 | 0.34±0.10 | 0.38±0.11 | 10.52±0.04 | 1.11±0.02 |
F9 | 38.08±0.23 | 0.35±0.10 | 0.41±0.05 | 14.63±0.07 | 1.17±0.03 |
TABLE 2: SUBLIMATION METHOD 20
Batch code | Angle of repose (θ) | Bulk Density (g/cm3) | Tapped Density (g/cm3) | Carr’s Index (%) | Hausner’s Ratio |
API | 26.27±0.13 | 0.31±0.03 | 0.36±0.01 | 13.88±0.33 | 1.16±0.04 |
SF1 | 31.21±0.16 | 0.29±0.01 | 0.34±0.01 | 14.70±0.23 | 1.17±0.02 |
SF2 | 28.48±0.24 | 0.31±0.10 | 0.37±0.04 | 16.21±0.27 | 1.19±0.09 |
SF3 | 33.16±0.17 | 0.29±0.02 | 0.33±0.02 | 12.12±0.06 | 1.13±0.03 |
SF4 | 30.79±0.14 | 0.33±0.03 | 0.39±0.01 | 15.38±0.85 | 1.18±0.05 |
SF5 | 30.27±0.19 | 0.31±0.11 | 0.36±0.03 | 13.88±0.67 | 1.16±0.02 |
SF6 | 29.13±0.14 | 0.34±0.01 | 0.40±0.03 | 15.00±0.31 | 1.17±0.04 |
SF7 | 31.08±0.13 | 0.33±0.04 | 0.37±0.02 | 10.81±0.13 | 1.12±0.06 |
SF8 | 32.26±0.21 | 0.31±0.03 | 0.35±0.01 | 11.42±0.26 | 1.12±0.01 |
SF9 | 33.41±0.22 | 0.34±0.02 | 0.38±0.04 | 10.52±0.09 | 1.11±0.03 |
TABLE 3: FORMULA FOR MOUTH DISSOLVING TABLETS OF HYDRALAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE BY DIRECT COMPRESSION METHOD 20
S. no. | Ingredients | Formulation code (amount per tablet in mg) | ||||||||
F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 | F9 | ||
1 | Hydralazine HCl | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
2 | Croscarmellose sodium | 8 | 10 | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
3 | Crospovidone | - | - | - | 8 | 10 | 12 | - | - | - |
4 | Sod. Starch glycolate | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8 | 10 | 12 |
5 | Aspartame | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
6 | Mannitol | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
7 | Magnesium Stearate | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
8 | MCC | 83 | 81 | 79 | 83 | 81 | 79 | 83 | 81 | 79 |
9 | Talc | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Total weight of tablet = 200 mg
TABLE 4: FORMULA FOR MOUTH DISSOLVING TABLETS OF HYDRALAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE BY SUBLIMATION METHOD 20
S. no. | Ingredients | Formulation code (amount per tablet in mg) | ||||||||
SF1 | SF2 | SF3 | SF4 | SF5 | SF6 | SF7 | SF8 | SF9 | ||
1 | Hydralazine HCl | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
2 | Crospovidone | 6 | 8 | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
3 | Croscarmellose sodium | - | - | - | 6 | 8 | 10 | - | - | - |
4 | Sod. Starch glycolate | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6 | 8 | 10 |
5 | Aspartame | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
6 | Mannitol | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
7 | Magnesium state | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
8 | Camphor | 2 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
9 | MCC | 83 | 80 | 77 | 83 | 80 | 77 | 83 | 80 | 77 |
10 | Talc | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Total weight of tablet = 200 mg
TABLE 5: EVALUATION OF HYDRALAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE MOUTH DISSOLVING TABLETS BY DIRECT COMPRESSION METHOD 20
Parameters | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 | F9 |
Weight variation
test (mg) |
200±0.98 | 201±0.76 | 199±0.63 | 197±0.73 | 201±0.66 | 199±0.84 | 200±0.65 | 201±0.94 | 201±0.84 |
Thickness (mm) | 2.9±0.02 | 2.8±0.01 | 3.0±0.02 | 3.1±0.04 | 3.5±0.03 | 3.7±0.02 | 2.4±0.08 | 2.5±0.02 | 2.8±0.09 |
Hardness
test (kg/cm3) |
2.7±0.33 | 2.8±0.12 | 3.0±0.24 | 3.1±0.2 2 | 3.5±0.31 | 3.7±0.42 | 2.4±0.17 | 2.5±0.19 | 2.8±0.27 |
Friability (%) | 0.56±0.17 | 0.42±0.22 | 0.51±0.25 | 0.29±0.17 | 0.53±0.23 | 0.56±0.27 | 0.72±0.19 | 0.77±0.14 | 0.79±0.21 |
Disintegration
time (sec) |
48±0.84 | 42±0.64 | 40±0.68 | 32±0.92 | 30±0.87 | 26±0.68 | 55±0.83 | 53±0.84 | 50±0.73 |
Wetting
time (sec) |
46±0.36 | 40±0.91 | 39±0.44 | 30±0.64 | 28±0.92 | 22±0.54 | 51±0.43 | 50±0.56 | 48±0.82 |
Water
absorption (%) |
71.41±0.73 | 70.43±0.61 | 74.98±0.47 | 84.32±0.65 | 88.32±0.94 | 92.87±0.91 | 64.32±0.43 | 65.42±0.74 | 68.50±0.53 |
Drug content (%) | 92.16±0.36 | 94.68±0.24 | 97.14±0.42 | 97.01±0.44 | 98.42±0.67 | 99.98±0.56 | 88.48±0.37 | 90.50±0.25 | 91.80.52 |
TABLE 6: EVALUATION OF HYDRALAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE MOUTH DISSOLVING TABLETS BY SUBLIMATION METHOD 20
Formulation Code (Sublimation Method) | |||||||||
Parameters | SF1 | SF2 | SF3 | SF4 | SF5 | SF6 | SF7 | SF8 | SF9 |
Weight variation test (mg) | 199±0.34 | 200±1.34 | 199±0.67 | 198±0.47 | 201±0.34 | 200±0.34 | 198±1.45 | 200±0.57 | 201±0.34 |
Thickness (mm) | 2.81±0.12 | 2.72±0.34 | 3.28±0.41 | 2.94±0.23 | 3.25±0.34 | 2.90±0.98 | 3.16±0.99 | 2.68±0.34 | 3.02±0.45 |
Hardness
test (kg/cm3) |
2.68±0.35 | 3.41±0.87 | 2.78±1.34 | 3.45±1.58 | 2.90±0.46 | 2.78±0.47 | 3.07±0.33 | 2.99±1.23 | 3.34±0.47 |
Friability (%) | 0.56±0.11 | 0.63±0.24 | 0.51±0.45 | 0.87±0.34 | 0.70±1.57 | 0.56±0.34 | 0.75±0.11 | 0.66±2.34 | 0.74±0.87 |
Disintegration
time (sec) |
25±0.34 | 31±0.34 | 27±1.34 | 30±0.89 | 28±0.33 | 30±0.47 | 29±0.48 | 32±0.34 | 34±0.93 |
Wetting time (sec) | 37±0.23 | 41±0.36 | 28±0.45 | 38±0.35 | 34±0.33 | 37±0.78 | 41±0.78 | 35±0.35 | 40±0.37 |
Water
absorption (%) |
70±0.67 | 69±1.34 | 82±1.40 | 79±1.20 | 76±0.61 | 85±0.99 | 81±0.56 | 74±0.36 | 70±0.46 |
Drug content(%) | 89±0.55 | 96±0.89 | 87±0.16 | 94±0.56 | 96±0.45 | 89±0.41 | 96±0.48 | 91±0.11 | 87±0.38 |
TABLE 7: COMPARATIVE IN-VITRO DISSOLUTION STUDY OF MDTS PREPARED BY DIRECT COMPRESSION METHOD 20
Time (min) | |||||||
Formulation code | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 |
F1 | 2.27±0.65 | 11.29±0.59 | 30.13±0.64 | 51.27±0.82 | 60.13±0.84 | 76.52±0.58 | 91.80±0.45 |
F2 | 3.00±0.46 | 16.69±0.62 | 34.41±0.38 | 45.95±0.59 | 54.68±0.67 | 65.70±0.43 | 87.43±0.58 |
F3 | 5.61±0.54 | 18.40±0.36 | 31.66±0.45 | 45.68±0.78 | 54.90±0.58 | 76.85±0.63 | 92.86±0.39 |
F4 | 5.34±0.55 | 15.40±0.53 | 25.00±0.64 | 46.93±0.39 | 60.13±0.55 | 71.53±0.57 | 88.88±0.64 |
F5 | 7.80±0.37 | 17.91±0.71 | 37.50±0.59 | 49.71±0.52 | 64.99±0.73 | 76.52±0.80 | 94.30±0.61 |
F6 | 5.20±0.64 | 20.80±0.83 | 38.20±0.55 | 51.57±0.68 | 62.80±0.63 | 76.82±0.43 | 95.34±0.55 |
F7 | 5.75±0.81 | 18.57±0.45 | 32.61±0.58 | 45.68±0.85 | 64.82±0.52 | 72.98±0.55 | 85.25±0.43 |
F8 | 5.26±0.58 | 22.17±0.51 | 33.81±0.39 | 49.55±0.78 | 62.72±0.64 | 78.43±0.76 | 89.75±0.57 |
F9 | 4.39±0.57 | 21.98±0.67 | 36.84±0.54 | 49.55±0.66 | 72.68±0.63 | 79.30±0.82 | 95.59±0.64 |
TABLE 8: COMPARATIVE IN-VITRO DISSOLUTION STUDY OF MDTs PREPARED BY SUBLIMATION METHOD 20
Time (min) | |||||||
Formulation code | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 |
SF1 | 5.34±0.3 | 23.34±14 | 38.64±0.34 | 51.43±0.12 | 72.95±0.246 | 87.13±0.84 | 98.31±0.58 |
SF2 | 6.16±0.12 | 20.67±12 | 41.40±0.24 | 46.80±0.05 | 68.80±0.435 | 86.89±0.77 | 96.00±0.42 |
SF3 | 6.16±0.71 | 20.67±45 | 41.40±0.67 | 46.80±0.71 | 68.80±0.81 | 86.89±0.43 | 96.00±0.54 |
SF4 | 9.46±1.5 | 24.16±0.58 | 40.22±0.23 | 59.34±0.23 | 76.50±0.36 | 83.90±0.38 | 96.08±0.43 |
SF5 | 7.25±21 | 23.89±0.76 | 39.73±0.58 | 47.89±0.24 | 64.80±0.58 | 78.33±0.86 | 95.29±0.62 |
SF6 | 8.34±0.9 | 23.34±0.45 | 33.16±16 | 51.43±0.47 | 66.19±0.34 | 79.24±0.51 | 79.24±0.34 |
SF7 | 7.83±0.58 | 23.610.47 | 37.82±0.74 | 46.80±0.61 | 72.70±0.71 | 85.11±0.72 | 98.04±0.71 |
SF8 | 8.01±0.12 | 19.74±0.87 | 45.46±0.57 | 60.18±0.12 | 79.52±0.34 | 87.45±0.28 | 100.74±0.52 |
SF9 | 7.83±0.23 | 22.39±0.98 | 41.34±0.34 | 52.55±0.58 | 71.37±14 | 87.76±0.66 | 99.98±0.77 |
FIG. 8: COMPARATIVE IN-VITRO DISSOLUTION STUDY OF MDTs PREPARED BY DIRECT COMPRESSION METHOD 20
FIG. 9: COMPARATIVE IN-VITRO DISSOLUTION STUDY OF MDTs PREPARED BY SUBLIMATION METHOD 20
DISCUSSION: Pre-compression Studies: The data obtained for pre-compressional parameters such as bulk density, tapped density, Hausner’s ratio, Carr’s index and angle of repose are shown in Table 1, Table 2 and found within acceptable Pharmacopoeia standards.
Formulation and Development: Mouth dissolving tablets of Hydralazine Hydrochloride were prepared by direct compression method and sublimation method and the formulas were presented in Table 3 and Table 4.
Post-compression Studies: Evaluations like weight variation, thickness, hardness, friability, wetting time, water absorption ratio assay, wetting time, in vitro disintegration time, in vitro drug dissolution study are mentioned in Table 5, Table 6, Table 7, Table 8 and Fig. 8, Fig. 9. The weight variation test for the optimised formulation F9 and SF9 of mouth dissolving tablets prepared by both the methods were measured in the range of 201 ± 0.94 mg and 201 ± 0.34 mg, Thickness was in the range of 2.8 ± 0.09 mm and 3.02 ± 0.45 mm, hardness in the range of 2.8 ± 0.27 kg/cm2 and 3.34 ± 0.47 kg/cm2. The percentage friability was less than 1% for all formulations ensuring mechanical stability of the formulated tablets.
TABLE 9: STABILITY STUDY FOR OPTIMISED FORMULATION F9 PREPARED BY DIRECT COMPRESSION METHOD
S. no. | Parameters | Initial | Stored at 40 °C ± 2 °C and 75% ± 5% RH | |||||
In month | ||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |||
1 | Description | White color | White color | White color | White color | White color | White color | White color |
2 | Average weight (mg) | 201 | 201 | 201 | 202 | 202 | 202 | 202 |
3 | Friability (%) | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.31 |
4 | Hardness (kg/cm2) | 3.7 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.5 |
5 | Disintegration time (sec) | 26 | 26 | 27 | 27 | 26 | 26 | 27 |
6 | Drug content (%) | 99.98 | 99.97 | 99.95 | 99.94 | 99.80 | 99.16 | 99.03 |
TABLE 10: COMPARATIVE IN-VITRO DISSOLUTION PROFILE OF ODTS OF HYDRALAZINE HCl (F9) PREPARED BY DIRECT COMPRESSION METHOD, BEFORE AND AFTER STORAGE AT 40 °C ± 2 °C AND 75% ± 5% RH
Time in minutes | Cumulative % of drug released (± S. D.) n = 6 | ||||||
Initial | 1st month | 2nd month | 3rd month | 4th month | 5th month | 6th month | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 14.64 ± 1.25 | 14.68 ± 1.34 | 14.45 ± 1.22 | 14.34 ± 1.20 | 14.28 ± 5.42 | 13.55 ± 2.03 | 14.79 ± 5.26 |
4 | 44.05 ± 1.47 | 44.01 ± 2.17 | 43.98 ± 1.40 | 43.68 ± 1.31 | 43.31 ± 1.477 | 43.67 ± 2.60 | 44.66 ± 1.79 |
6 | 72.52 ± 0.65 | 72.50 ± 0.81 | 71.23 ± 0.44 | 72.01 ± 0.12 | 71.50 ± 0.61 | 72.33 ± 0.78 | 72.63± 0.97 |
8 | 83.29 ± 0.69 | 83.29 ± 0.67 | 82.18 ± 0.58 | 83.14 ± 0.24 | 82.86 ± 0.14 | 83.16 ± 0.62 | 82.44 ± 0.74 |
10 | 89.78 ± 0.58 | 89.70 ± 0.86 | 89.56 ± 0.72 | 89.10 ± 0.24 | 89.70 ± 0.13 | 89.84 ± 0.22 | 89.68 ± 0.52 |
12 | 90.20 ± 0.58 | 90.10 ± 0.24 | 90.01 ± 0.64 | 89.92 ± 0.82 | 89.65 ± 0.35 | 89.30 ± 0.12 | 89.42 ± 0.52 |
All formulations were evaluated for percentage drug content and found in the range of 92.16 ± 0.36 to 99.98 indicating the compliance with the Pharmacopoeia limits. According to the Pharmacopoeia standards the dispersible tablet must disintegrate within 3 min, but all formulated batches have shown very low disintegration time i.e. 30.047 to 55.083 seconds indicating suitability of formulation for mouth dissolving tablet. Wetting time found in the range of 46±0.36 seconds and 50 ± 0.56 seconds, water absorption ratio was 65.42 ± 0.74 percentage and 71.41 ± 0.73 percentages. In vitro study was found to be optimum for the formulation F9 and SF9 in the range of 95.59 ± 0.64 percentages and 99.98 ± 0.77 percentages at 12 minutes. Stability results represented in Table 9, Table 10 and Fig. 10 also indicated that the optimised formulation F9 shows better stability under accelerated condition as per the Pharmacopoeia standards.
TABLE 11: STABILITY STUDY FOR OPTIMISED FORMULATION SF9 PREPARED BY SUBLIMATION METHOD 21
S. no. | Parameters | Initial | Stored at 40 °C ± 2 °C and 75% ± 5% RH | |||||
In month | ||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |||
1 | Description | White color | White colour | White color | White color | White color | White color | White color |
2 | Average weight (mg) | 200 | 200 | 199.90 | 199.28 | 200 | 199.90 | 199.28 |
3 | Friability (%) | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
4 | Hardness (kg/cm2) | 3.9 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 2.9 |
5 | Disintegration time (sec) | 13 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
6 | Drug content (%) | 99.99 | 99.90 | 99.82 | 99.80 | 99.90 | 99.82 | 99.80 |
TABLE 12: COMPARATIVE IN-VITRO DISSOLUTION PROFILE OF FAST DISSOLVING TABLETS OF HYDRALAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE (SF9) PREPARED BY SUBLIMATION METHOD, BEFORE AND AFTER STORAGE AT 40 °C ± 2 °C AND 75% ± 5% RH
Time in minutes | Cumulative % of drug release (± S. D.) n = 6 | ||||||
Initial | 1st month | 2nd month | 3rd month | 4th month | 5th month | 6th month | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 22.13 ± 0.25 | 22.01 ± 0.26 | 22.00 ± 0.14 | 21.88 ± 0.54 | 21.81 ± 0.58 | 22.48 ± 0.53 | 21.65± 0.49 |
4 | 57.38 ± 0.47 | 57.28 ± 0.40 | 57.04 ± 0.26 | 56.92 ± 0.24 | 57.67 ± 0.05 | 57.62 ± 0.67 | 56.75± 0.83 |
6 | 77.52 ± 0.15 | 77.50 ± 0.14 | 76.98 ± 0.11 | 76.62 ± 0.82 | 76.55 ± 0.62 | 76.85 ± 0.95 | 76.22 ± 0.63 |
8 | 89.20 ± 0.32 | 89.12 ± 0.24 | 88.92 ± 0.14 | 88.82 ± 0.45 | 89.37 ± 0.56 | 88.24 ± 0.48 | 88.32 ± 0.66 |
10 | 93.78 ± 0.98 | 93.44 ± 0.72 | 93.01 ± 0.26 | 92.42 ± 0.58 | 92.42 ± 0.52 | 92.01 ± 0.71 | 92.12 ± 0.55 |
12 | 98.20 ± 0.1 | 98.10 ± 0.14 | 97.92 ± 0.12 | 97.89 ± 0.18 | 97.63 ± 0.81 | 97.73 ± 0.84 | 97.28 ± 0.92 |
Stability results represented in Table 11, Table 12 and Fig. 11 also indicated that the optimised formulation SF9 showed good results under accelerated condition as per the Pharmacopoeia standards.
FIG. 10: COMPARATIVE IN-VITRO DISSOLUTION PROFILE OF ODTs OF HYDRALAZINE HCl (F9) PREPARED BY DIRECT COMPRESSION METHOD, BEFORE AND AFTER STORAGE AT 40 °C ± 2 °C TO 75% ± 5% RH
FIG. 11: COMPARATIVE IN-VITRO DISSOLUTION PROFILE OF ODTs OF HYDRALAZINE HCl (SF9) PREPARED BY SUBLIMATION METHOD, BEFORE AND AFTER STORAGE AT 40 °C ± 2 °C TO 75% ± 5% RH
CONCLUSION: From this study F9 and SF9 were concluded as optimized and stable formulations from the results of post compression parameters with an effective percentage of drug release at 12 minutes indicating faster and maximum absorption at the site of administration.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The author would like to thanks Guide Dr. R. Sundara Ganapathy for his valuable guidance and inspiration for promoting this work. I would like to thank Karpagam Academy of Higher Education for providing facilities for conducting the work.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors state that there is no conflict of interest in the present manuscript.
REFERENCES:
- Arijit G: Orodispersible tablets, A New Venture in Modern Formulation Technology, The Pharma Innovation 2012; 1(8): 14-31.
- Dutta S and De P: Formulation of fast disintegrating tablets. Int J Drug Formulation and Res 2011; 2(1): 45-51.
- Kanaka DDN, Prameela RA and Saimrudula B: Formulation and evaluation of oral disintegrating tablets of montelukast sodium: effect of functionality of superdisintegrants. J pharma Res 2010; 3(4): 803-08.
- Naresh K, Deepika P, Srilatha M, Adukondalu D, Sriram P and Reddy MV: Journal of General Practice 2015; 3: 208.
- Prajapathi B, Ratnakar N: International Journal of Pharmatech Research 2009; 1:790-798.
- Hirani JSJ, Rathod DA and Vadalia KR: Topical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 2009; 8: 161-172.
- Marshall D, Lindheimer MD, Sandra J, Taler MD and Cunningham MD: Hypertension in pregnancy, Journal of American Society of Hypertension 2008; 2(6): 484-494.
- wikipedia.org/wiki/Preeclampsia.
- wikipedia.org/wiki/Eclampsia.
- Radke RS, Jadhav JK and Chajeed MR: Formulation and evaluation of orodispersible tablets of baclofen. Int J Chem Tech Res 2009; 1: 517–21.
- Vilegave K, Vidyasagar G and Chandankar P: Preformulation studies of pharmaceutical new drug molecule and products: An Overview. American journal of pharmacy and health research 2013; 1(3): 1-20.
- General Notice: Indian Pharmacopeia, Published by the controller of publication civil line Delhi 1996; 1: 07.
- Amrutha JV: Pre-and Post-Compression Studies of Tablets: Inorganic Chemistry 2016; 11(3).
- Nagashree K:Solid dosage forms: Tablets: Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis 2015; 4(2): 60-71.
- Venugopal P, Gnanaprakash K, Kumar B, Gobinath M and Narendra Reddy B: development of formulation and evaluation of Ramipril porous tablet by sublimation technique: International Journal of Biopharmaceutics. 2014; 5(4): 258-264.
- Devendra RR, Hemant NG, Vikash VP, Vinod MT and Vijay RP: Formulation and evaluation of fast dissolving tablets of Albendazole. Int Curr Pharm J, 2012; 1(10): 311-316.
- Patel CJ, Asija R, Mangukia D, Rathi H and Patel K: Formulation and evaluation of orodispersible tablets of Diazepam using different superdisintegrants. Int Res J Pharm, 2012; 3(3): 298-301.
- Rao NGR, Kumar M, Mettu SR, Kistayya C and Reddy BM: Development and evaluation of fast dissolving tablets of Fosinopril by sublimation method. Int J Pharm Sci Drug Res 2012; 4(4): 230-235.
- Bhunia B and Varun J: Formulation and evaluation of orodispersible tablet of Amlodipine besylate. Int J Pharm Tech, 2011; 3(4): 3745-3766.
- Blessy M, Patel RD, Prajapati PN and Agrawal YK: Development of forced degradation and stability indicating studies of drugs - A review: Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis 4(3): 159-165.
- Muthukumar S, Sundara Ganapathy R: Design and Evaluation of Hydralazine Hydrochloride Mouth Dissolving Tablet for the Management of Hypertension. Int J Recent Sci Res 2017; 8(5): 17230-1723.
How to cite this article:
Kumar SM and Ganapathy RS: Formulation and evaluation of hydralazine hydrochloride mouth dissolving tablet for the management of eclampsia and pre-eclampsia. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2018; 9(3): 1068-76.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(3).1068-76.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
25
1068-1076
911
1212
English
IJPSR
S. M. Kumar* and R. S. Ganapathy
Faculty of Pharmacy, Karpagam University, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
pharmmuthu@gmail.com
09 June, 2017
21 August, 2017
29 August, 2017
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(3).1068-76
01 March, 2018