FORMULATION AND IN-VITRO EVALUATION OF FLOATING TABLETS OF HYDROXYPROPYL METHYLCELLULOSE K4M AND CARBOPOL-934P USING METRONIDAZOLE AS A MODEL DRUG
HTML Full TextFORMULATION AND IN-VITRO EVALUATION OF FLOATING TABLETS OF HYDROXYPROPYL METHYLCELLULOSE K4M AND CARBOPOL-934P USING METRONIDAZOLE AS A MODEL DRUG
Amritha V.*, Surinder Kaur and Krishna Hari Pandey
Department of Pharmaceutics, The Oxford College of Pharmacy, Hongasandra, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
ABSTRACT: In the present study, metronidazole was used for preparing floating dosage forms that are designed to retain in the stomach for a long time and have developed as a drug delivery system for better eradication of Helicobacter Pylori in peptic ulcer diseases. Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC K4M) and Carbopol-934P of different ratio were used to prepare Hydrodynamically Balanced Systems (HBS) by direct compression technique. The prepared HBS tablets were evaluated in terms of their pre-compression parameters and post-compression parameters like hardness, friability, weight variation, uniformity of drug content, percentage swelling, in-vitro floating studies, in-vitro drug release and short term stability studies. The floating properties and drug release characteristics were determined for the prepared HBS in 0.1 N HCl dissolution media. All the HBS formulations showed good in-vitro floating properties with an optimum concentration of gas generating agents; sodium bicarbonate and citric acid. The rate of drug release decreased with increased hardness of tablets. Optimum concentration of HPMC K4M (140 mg) and Carbopol-934P (10 mg) along with excipients was found to be beneficial in improving the drug release rate and floating properties. Among the eight formulations, F8 was selected as the best formulation as its lag time was 10.3 seconds, percentage swelling 119.91% at 4th hour and % drug release 75.62% at 8th hour with buoyancy time >12 hours.
Keywords: |
Metronidazole, Hydrodynamically Balanced Systems, Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC K4 M), Carbopol-934, In-vitro, floating
INTRODUCTION:Effervescent floating drug delivery systems generate gas (CO2), thus reduce the density of the system and remain buoyant in the stomach for a prolonged period of time and released the drug slowly at a desired rate 1. Floating Drug Delivery System (FDDS) has less density (<1.004gm/cm3) than gastric fluid so they buoyant in fluid and show sustained release 2.
Metronidazole is a nitroimidazole antibiotic medication used particularly for anaerobic bacteria and protozoa. Metronidazole is an antibiotic, amoebicidal and antiprotozoal. It is the drug of choice for first episodes of mild-to-moderate Clostridium difficile infection.
Metronidazole is indicated for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy, as part of a multi-drug regimen in peptic ulcer disease. It is usually taken two or three times a day 3. Administration of prolonged release floating tablet will result in prolonged retention of the drug in the gastric fluid. Thus, resulting in complete dissolution of drug in extended period of time by enhancing the drug absorption and thereby reduce the dosing frequency of the drug in therapy 4.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Metronidazole, carbopol-934P, ethyl cellulose and microcrystalline cellulose was obtained from Yarrow Chem Products Mumbai. HPMC K4M was gifted by BAL Pharma, Bommasandra, Bangalore, in the year of 2013. Chemicals were all used as received.
Method: Floating tablets of Metronidazole was prepared by direct compression method. All the weighed quantities of ingredients except Magnesium stearate were blended in glass mortar uniformly and were passed through sieve number 80 to get fine particles. After sufficient mixing of drug as well as other excipients, Magnesium stearate was added and further mixed for additional 2-3 minutes to get uniformly blended powder mixture. Powder thus obtained was compressed into tablets on a 10 station single punch rotary tablet compression machine in the pharmaceutics laboratory (machine room) of The Oxford College of Pharmacy, Bangalore.
Evaluation: Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) study was conducted to test the compatibility of drug with the polymer. The flow properties of blends (before compression) were characterized in terms of Angle of repose, Bulk density and Tapped density, Carr’s index and Hausner’s ratio 5.
Physical evaluation of Metronidazole Floating Tablet 5: Hardness of the tablets was tested using a Monsanto hardness tester. Friability of tablets was determined in Roche friabilator. Twenty tablets were selected randomly from each batch and weighed individually to check for weight variation.
- The buoyancy lag time (BLT) and total floating time (TFT) 6: Tablets were kept in 0.1N HCl solution at 37±0.5°C and the time taken for tablet to float was noted down as BLT and the total time tablet floated was noted down as TFT.
- Drug content estimation: For drug content estimation 5 tablets from each formulation were taken and crushed to powder. Powder weight equivalent to 50 mg drug was taken and dissolved in 50 ml of 0.1 N HCl. From the first solution, 1 ml solution was taken in 100 ml volumetric flask and the volume was made up to 100 ml with 0.1 N HCl. Solution was then filtered and absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically at 276 nm against 0.1 N HCl as a blank.
- Swelling study 7: The swelling property of all drug containing formulations were determined by placing the tablet matrices in the dissolution test apparatus, in 900 ml of 0.1 N HCl at 37± 0.5 oC. The tablets were removed periodically from dissolution medium and after draining free from water by blotting paper, these were measured for weight gain. Swelling characteristics were expressed in terms of percentage swelling calculated using the given formula;
Percentage Swelling =
Weight of tablet at time t – Initial weight of the tablet ×100 %
Initial weight of the tablet
- In-vitro Dissolution studies: The release profile of Floating tablet of Metronidazole was determined using USP dissolution test apparatus II (basket type) at 50 rpm using 0.1 N HCl as dissolution medium at temperature of 37±0.5°C. 1 ml of the sample was withdrawn at an hour interval for 8 hours and replaced with the same volume of fresh dissolution medium. The withdrawn samples were diluted to 10 ml using 0.1 N HCl. Absorbance of these solutions was measured at 276 nm using a UV Visible spectrophotometer. The cumulative percentage drug release was plotted against time to determine the release profile.
- In-vitro drug release kinetic studies 8: The dissolution data were of all the batches were fitted to various kinetic models like zero order, first order, Higuchi square root, Korsmeyer- Peppas model to ascertain exact mechanism of drug release from the tablets.
- Short term stability studies: The formulation (F8) was selected for stability studies on the basis of in-vitro buoyancy and in-vitro drug dissolution studies. The tablets were investigated at 25±2°C/ 60±5% RH for 1st month and at 40±2°C/ 75±5% RH for 2nd month. Various tablet properties were analysed after the stability test.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In the present study, floating tablets of Metronidazole were prepared by using HPMC as a matrix binding agent, carbopol as a gelling agent and sodium bicarbonate and citric acid as effervescent agent. Floating tablets of metronidazole were developed to increase the gastric residence time of the drug, so that they can be retained in stomach for longer time resulting in controlled release of drug. A total number of eight formulations (table 1) were prepared by direct compression technique after the confirmation of compatibility of Metronidazole drug with the selected polymer done using FT-IR study. The pre-formulation studies such as bulk density, tapped density, angle of repose, compressibility index and Hausner’s ratio were evaluated which were found to be within prescribed limits and indicated excellent flowing property (table 2).
The data obtained from physicochemical parameters such as hardness, friability, weight variation, drug content were in acceptable range (table 3).The swelling percentage of all the formulations was more than 90% thus revealed the better swelling behavior of all the tablet (table 4 and figure 1).
TABLE 1: FORMULATION TABLE OF FLOATING TABLETS OF METRONIDAZOLE
Ingredients | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 |
Metronidazole | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
HPMC K4 M | 100 | 110 | 90 | 120 | 80 | 130 | 70 | 140 |
Carbopol-934 | 50 | 40 | 60 | 30 | 70 | 20 | 80 | 10 |
Sodium Bicarbonate | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Citric acid | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
Ethyl Cellulose | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
MCC | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
Magnesium Stearate | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Talc | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Total Weight (mg) | 490 | 490 | 490 | 490 | 490 | 490 | 490 | 490 |
TABLE 2: PRE-COMPRESSION STUDY DATA
Formulation code | Angle of repose (°) ±SD | Compressibility Index (%) | Hausner’s Ratio | Flow Property |
F1 | 28.16 ± 1.030 | 08.68 % | 1.09 | Excellent |
F2 | 24.58 ± 0.899 | 10.17 % | 1.11 | Excellent |
F3 | 25.16 ± 0.612 | 12.09% | 1.14 | Excellent |
F4 | 24.71 ± 1.306 | 10.63% | 1.12 | Excellent |
F5 | 25.36 ± 0.465 | 10.50% | 1.12 | Excellent |
F6 | 29.563±1.446 | 11.2% | 1.13 | Excellent |
F7 | 26.15±1.905 | 10.57% | 1.14 | Excellent |
F8 | 24.26±1.235 | 12.5% | 1.11 | Excellent |
TABLE 3: POST-COMPRESSION STUDY DATA
Formulation code | Weight variation (mg) ±SD | Hardness (kg/cm2) ±SD | Friability (% loss) ±SD | Thickness (mm) | Drug content (%) |
F1 | 482.7±5.22 | 4.26±1.36 | 0.415±0.048 | 4.02±0.01 | 97.71 |
F2 | 482.75±4.55 | 5.9±0.79 | 0.23±0.013 | 4.04±0.02 | 100.57 |
F3 | 480.6±5.16 | 6.66±0.288 | 0.449±0.046 | 4.04±0.00 | 99.71 |
F4 | 483.05±4.22 | 4.03±0.33 | 0.049±0.034 | 4.02±0.00 | 109.90 |
F5 | 484.95±6.14 | 5.83±0.288 | 0.534±0.07 | 4.04±0.00 | 94.85 |
F6 | 481.95±4.28 | 7.1±1.014 | 0.036±0.046 | 4.02±0.00 | 95.71 |
F7 | 484.85±4.53 | 4.66±0.763 | 0.519±0.152 | 4.03±0.01 | 103.90 |
F8 | 484.45±4.70 | 4.33±0.208 | 0.232±0.053 | 4.02±0.00 | 101.33 |
TABLE 4: PERCENTAGE SWELLING TABLE FOR F1-F8
Formulation code | 15 | 30 | 60 | 120 | 240 |
F1 | 28.51145 | 46.4049 | 61.90766 | 80.15381 | 99.92982 |
F2 | 10.86815 | 49.24518 | 70.59565 | 78.22612 | 103.8123 |
F3 | 55.50933 | 55.29607 | 73.6144 | 86.15062 | 102.7313 |
F4 | 20.70958 | 49.17945 | 65.97686 | 79.81906 | 123.5402 |
F5 | 18.92734 | 42.39038 | 54.02336 | 69.1511 | 83.61179 |
F6 | 29.55112 | 50.21686 | 65.05932 | 81.0084 | 111.396 |
F7 | 27.79882 | 38.77314 | 49.58849 | 62.85871 | 78.50495 |
F8 | 22.68451 | 46.51887 | 64.38412 | 82.70529 | 119.9171 |
FIGURE 1: PERCENTAGE SWELLING GRAPH FOR F1-F8
From in-vitro drug dissolution profile of floating tablets of Metronidazole, it was found that the formulation F8 containing 140 mg of HPMC K4M and 10 mg of carbopol-934P showed highest drug release (75.6245%) in comparison with other formulations (figure 3). Tablets of batch F8 have considerable in-vitro drug release, and also showing good floating lag time (10.7 ± 2.00 seconds) and good buoyancy time (>12 hours) (table 5). Thus the formulation F8 was selected as the most satisfactory formulation.
FIGURE 2: IN-VITRO DISSOLUTION GRAPH OF METRONIDAZOLE FLOATING TABLETS
TABLE 5: RESULTS OF IN-VITRO BUOYANCY STUDY OF METRONIDAZOLE FLOATING TABLETS
Formulation Code | Buoyancy Lag (seconds) | Total Floating Time (hours) |
F1 | 42.0 ± 13.076 | >12 |
F2 | 28.0 ± 08.185 | >12 |
F3 | 38.0 ± 11.135 | >12 |
F4 | 18.7 ± 04.725 | >12 |
F5 | 51.3 ± 15.82 | >12 |
F6 | 16.5±03.25 | >12 |
F7 | 55.6±3.23 | >12 |
F8 | 10.3±2.0 | >12 |
The most satisfactory formulation F8 was fitted into various in-vitro drug release kinetic models and best fit model was found to be first order in case of all formulations than zero order (table 6 and figure 3-5). The drug release kinetics follows Higuchi model and the mechanism of drug release was found to be non Fickian/anomalous. Release pattern from formulations followed both membrane erosion and diffusion process.
TABLE 6: KINETIC RELEASE DATA OF DIFFERENT MODEL FOR FORMULATION F8
Model | Slope | R2 |
Zero Order | 11.009 | 0.9009 |
First Order | -0.0777 | 0.9917 |
Higuchi’s | 32.329 | 0.9939 |
FIGURE 3: ZERO ORDER PLOT OF METRONIDAZOLE (F8) FORMULATION
FIGURE 4: FIRST ORDER PLOT OF METRONIDAZOLE (F8) FORMULATION
FIGURE 5:HIGUCHI PLOT OF METRONIDAZOLE (F8) FORMULATION
The most satisfactory formulations F8 was subjected to the short term stability studies by placing in varied conditions for sixty days. The in-vitro drug release and other formulation property of F8 showed no significant changes confirming that the formulations are stable after a period of sixty days (table 7).
TABLE 7: STABILITY STUDY OF FORMULATION F8
Parameters | 1st month
25°C ± 2°C/ 60% RH ± 5% |
2nd month
40°C ± 2°C/ 75% RH ± 5% |
Physical Appearance | White, convex faced | White, convex faced |
Weight Variation (mg) | 484.45±4.70 | 484.45±4.90 |
Hardness (Kg/cm2 ) | 4.33±0.208 | 4.30±0.308 |
Drug Content (%) | 101±0.03 | 100±0.65 |
Floating Lag Time (sec) | 10.3±2.0 | 10.3±41.0 |
Total Floating Time (hours) | >12 | >12 |
In-vitroRelease (%) | 75.65±0.011 | 75.63±0.041 |
Buoyancy on disturbing | Float | Float |
CONCLUSION:This study discusses the preparation of floating tablets of Metronidazole. The effervescent-based floating drug delivery was a promising approach to achieve in-vitro buoyancy. The addition of polymer HPMC, Carbopol, Ethyl Cellulose and gas-generating agent sodium bicarbonate was essential to achieve in-vitro buoyancy. Addition of citric acid, to achieve buoyancy under the elevated pH of the stomach caused an enhancement in drug release. The polymer composition affects the drug release rate and the mechanism. Polymer swelling is crucial in determining the drug release rate and is also important for floatation. A lesser FLT and a prolonged floating duration could be achieved by varying the amount of HPMC and Carbopol and was found to be best in formulation F8 which shows a floating duration (>12hrs) having a controlled release characteristic (75.62%) in 8 hours. Good stability was observed for 2 months during stability studies.
Since the formulation showed sufficient release for prolonged period, the dosing frequency can be reduced and possible incomplete absorption of the drug can be avoided.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The authors are thankful to the Principal, The Oxford College of Pharmacy, Bangalore, for providing necessary facilities for research work. They are also grateful to BAL Pharma, Bommasandra, Bangalore, for giving gift sample of HPMC K4M.
REFERENCES:
- Pare A, Yadav SK and Patil UK: Formulation and evaluation of effervescent floating tablet of amlodipine. Research J Pharm and Tech 2008; 1: 526-530.
- Singh LP, Rajesh KS, Umalkar DG, Chauhan VK, Rana VK and Vasava KS: Floating effervescent tablet: A review. J Pharm Biomed Sci 2011; 5: 1-6.
- Babu GD, Chandra SR, Sreedevi A, Reddy BVV and Srilatha N: Formulation and evaluation of novel effervescent metronidazole floating tablet. Int J Research Pharm and Biomed Sci 2011; 2: 1657-1662.
- Masareddy R, Yellanki SK, Pattil BR and Manvi FV: Development and evaluation of floating matrix tablets of riboflavin. Int J PharmTech Res 2010; 2: 1439-1445.
- Mark Gibson: Pharmaceutical preformulation and formulation. Interpharm, Florida, Second Edition 2004.
- Aulton ME: Pharmaceutics; The Science of Dosage Form Design. Churchill Livingstone, London, Second Edition 2002.
- Patel N, Nagesh C, Patel J, Chandrashekhar S and Devdatt J: Formulation and evaluation of floating tablet containing glipizide. Asian J Pharm Tech 2012; 2: 135-140.
- Dash S, Murthy PN, Nath L and Chowdhury P: Kinetic modeling on drug release from controlled drug delivery systems. Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica - Drug Research 2010; 67: 217-223.
How to cite this article:
Amritha V, Kaur S and Pandey KH: Formulation and in-vitro evaluation of floating Tablets of Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose K4M and Carbopol-934p using Metronidazole as a model drug. Int J Pharm Sci Res2014; 5(6): 2244-49.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.5(6).2244-49
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
19
2244-2249
497KB
1230
English
IJPSR
Amritha V.*, Surinder Kaur and Krishna Hari Pandey
Department of Pharmaceutics, The Oxford College of Pharmacy, Hongasandra, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
amrithakariat1988@gmail.com
16 December, 2013
12 February, 2014
25 April, 2014
http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.5(6).2244-49
01, June 2014