FORMULATION AND IN VITRO EVALUATION OF PIDOTIMOD DISPERSIBLE TABLETS
HTML Full TextReceived on 21 August, 2013; received in revised form, 06 December, 2013; accepted, 15 January, 2014; published 01 February, 2014
FORMULATION AND IN VITRO EVALUATION OF PIDOTIMOD DISPERSIBLE TABLETS
Liandong Hu*1, 2, Deliang Gu 1, 2, Qiaofeng Hu 1, 2
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hebei University 1, PR China
Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Quality Control of Hebei Province 2, Baoding, PR China
ABSTRACT: The aim of this article was to develop pidotimod dispersible tablet and optimize the ingredients for the tablets. The effect of ingredients (diluents, disintegrants and lubricants) on the characteristics of the tablets was evaluated. The pidotimod dispersible tablets were prepared by wet granulation. The effect of diluents on the tablets was investigated by Carr’s index, dissolution, hardness, friability and taste. The effect of disintegrants on the tablets was determined by dissolution and cost. And the effect of lubricants on the tablets was studied by weight, hardness and dissolution behavior. The results showed that the optimum proportion was 400mg pidotimod, 120mg MCC, 80mg mannitol, 120mg CMS-Na, 60mg lactose, 20mg aspartame, 10mg magnesium stearate and 6%PVP 50% ethanol solution. Pidotimod dispersible tablets with optimum proportion showed acceptable taste, hardness, friability, dissolution behavior. The preparation process was simple and the tablets could be prepared by ordinary tablet production equipment. So it is suitable for mass industrialized production. The final tableting formulation and the simplified process both had tremendous potentials in commercial large-scale production.
Keywords: |
Pidotimod, Dispersible tablet, Diluents, Disintegrants, Dissolution behavior
INTRODUCTION:Pidotimod (Polymod, also known as Pidotimod) is a synthetic dipeptide, which acts as a biological response modifier (BRM) 1.
It is capable of stimulating humoral and cellular immunity 2, activate natural killer cell, enhance the phagocytic function of macrophage and neutrophilic granulocyte, promote the proliferation of lymphocyte induced by mitogens, and increase the production of cytokines such as Interleukin 2 and γ-interferon 3, 4, 5.
In vitro studies for both human and animal specimens have indicated a good activity on innate and adaptive immune responses and have been documented by in vivo studies. These activities have been applied in clinical studies demonstrating the efficacy of pidotimod in reducing the rate of recurrent infections of the upper respiratory and urinary tracts in children.
The same results were obtained in recurrent respiratory tract infections in adults. Interestingly, these effects are more evident in the setting of immune defects such as senescence, downs syndrome, and cancer. Researches have also demonstrated that pidotimod itself does not have antibacterial activity, but when combined with antibacterial agents, pidotimod can be effective in improving clinical effects, promoting recovery, and shortening therapy time 6, 7, 8.
Oral administration is the most preferred route with the virtues such as ease of ingestion, avoidance of pain, patient compliance. Efforts to ease administration and enhance acceptability of the tablet to pediatric and geriatric patients triggered the development of a new formulation-dispersible tablet 9.
British Pharmacopoeia defined dispersible tablets (DPTs) as the film-coated or uncoated tablets intended to be dispersed in water before administration giving a homogeneous dispersion 10. There are two types of dispersible tablets which should be distinguished: one disintegrates quickly in the mouth without the need of water 11, 12, the other is dispersed in water to form a dispersion that is easy to use by pediatric and geriatric patients 13. Up to now, there are various types of dispersible dosage forms that have been marketed by pharmaceutical companies, such as Afeksin® by Actavis Ltd., Coartem® by Novartis and Medicines, Amotaks® by Polfa Tarchomin SA 14, 15.
Because the ordinary pidotimod tablets are too big in shape to be taken by pediatric and geriatric. It is necessary to make a new preparation of pidotimod to take it conveniently. The aim of this study was to design a new formulation of pidotimod, pidotimod dispersible tablet, which dissolved in water quickly and could be swallowed by patients easily, and to determine the optimum formula. The pidotimod dispersible tablets were prepared by wet granulation. We investigated the effect of the ratio of MCC, lactose and mannitol in the tablets on physical properties and dissolution test. Types of lubricant were also investigated. So were the ratio and type of disintegrants in tablets.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pidotimod was obtained from Xianju Pharmaceautical Co.Ltd…(Zhejiang, China). Microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) was obtained from Huzhou Zhanwang Co. (Huzhou, China), Lactose, providone (PVP), crospovidone (PVPP), Carboxymethy starch Sodium (CMS-Na) were obtained from ShanHe Excipents Co.Ltd (Anhui, China). Mannitol was obtained from Hua Xu Pharmaceutical Co.Ltd (Hebei, China). Magnesium stearate and talc were obtained from Ao Da Pharmaceutical Co.Ltd (Liaoning, China).
Preparation of the tablets: The pidotimod dispersible tablets were prepared by wet granulation. Pidotimod and excipients for tablets were weighed. All ingredients, except the lubricant, passed through 80 meshes and then were added and blended for 10 min. Then the mixture was granulated in a mortar by binder. The obtained granulates were dried in a 50°C oven for 4 hours. The final granules were then passed through a 18-mesh sieve, and the lubricant was sieved through a 40-mesh sieve onto the mixture and blended for 5 min. Finally, the granules were compressed using a single-punch tablets formation machine with a 13mm diameter biconcave punch and die set.
Carr’s index: Carr’s index was calculated using the equation ([p tap – p bul]/ p tap)* 100. The bulk and tap densities were determined as follows. Each sample (20 g) was poured through a funnel into a 100-mL tarred graduated cylinder. The cylinder was then lightly tapped to collect all the powder sticking on the wall of the cylinder. The volume was read directly from the cylinder and used to calculate the bulk density. For tap density, the cylinder was tapped to attain a constant volume reading from the cylinder.
Hardness: Hardness of ten randomly selected tablets was determined. The mean hardness and coefficient of hardness variation were calculated.
Friability test: Tablet friability was measured as the percentage of weight loss of 10 tablets tumbled in a friabilator. After 4 minutes of rotation at 25 rpm, dust of tablets was removed and percentage weight loss was calculated.
HPLC analysis: The samples were determined using a Shimadzu LC-20AT HPLC (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a C-18 chromatographic column (5μm, 250 mm × 4.6 mm). The mobile phase was composed of sodium dihydrogen phosphate - methanol-isopropanol (97:2:1, V/V/V). The flow rate was 1.0mL/min. The wavelength was set at 210nm.
In vitro studies: Dissolution studies were carried out using a ZRS-8G dissolution apparatus (Haiyida, China). Test samples were tested at the paddle rotation speed of 50 rpm in 900mL distilled water at 37±0.5°C.
The sample 5ml withdrawal by suitable time interval and fresh dissolution medium were added in the each withdrawal. The samples were filtered through a membrane filter (pore size 0.45μm) then appropriately diluted and measured by HPLC shown above.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Effect of diluent on the qualities of pidotimod dispersible tablets: Lactose, MCC, sucrose, mannitol and starch are used as diluents to investigate effect of different contents of diluents on Carr’s index, hardness, friability and dissolution. The Carr’s index was found to be in the range 10%-12% which shown good compressibility of the powder blend. Hardness (40N-50N) and friability (0.32%-0.45%) showed the good mechanical resistance of the tablets. And all the tablets had smooth surface without spots.
Another an important parameter that should be investigated was dissolution behavior. From Table 1 we could see that all formulations had good dissolution behavior. And it also showed a decreased dissolution behavior due to increasing contents of lactose. But the contents of MCC should not be too high, for it had grittiness. Considering all these reasons, we selected F5 for future research.
TABLE 1: FORMULATIONS OF DIFFERENT DILUENTS AND RESULTS
FORMULATION
INGREDIENTS (mg) |
F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 |
Pidotimod | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 |
MCC | 60 | 75 | 90 | 105 | 120 | 135 |
Mannitol | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 |
PVPP | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 |
Lactose | 120 | 105 | 90 | 75 | 60 | 45 |
Aspartame | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
Magnesium stearate | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
6%PVP 50% ethanol solution | Appropriate amount | Appropriate amount | Appropriate amount | Appropriate amount | Appropriate amount | Appropriate amount |
Results | ||||||
Carr’s index (%) | 10.56 | 10.83 | 11.42 | 11.16 | 10.62 | 10.74 |
Dissolution (%) | 75.4 | 79.7 | 84.5 | 86.4 | 85.2 | 89.9 |
Hardness (N) | 40-50 | 40-50 | 40-50 | 40-50 | 40-50 | 40-50 |
Friability (%) | 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.45 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.37 |
Effect of lubricant on the preparation of pidotimod dispersible tablets: To investigate the effect of different types of lubricants on the preparation of pidotimod dispersible tablets, we selected talc, magnesium stearate and aerosil as lubricants. In the study, the magnesium stearate in F5 was replaced by talc or aerosil with the same weight, and other components remained unchanged.
After tableting with the same method, we found that all these lubricants could make tablets with smooth surface without spots. And all tablets had no significant difference in weight, hardness and dissolution behavior. Then we chose magnesium stearate as lubricant and the content of it in each tablet was 10 mg.
Effect of disintegrant on dissolution: the influence of the contents of CMS-Na and PVPP on the dissolution of pidotimod from the tablets was investigated.
The result was shown in Table 2. From Table 2, we could see that the dissolution amount increased with increasing of the content of CMS-Na or PVPP in each tablet from 80mg to 120mg. And there were no significant differences in the appearance of tablets. Because tablets with CMS-Na had a little higher percentage of drug release than tablets with the same weight of PVPP and the price of PVPP was higher than CMS-Na.
We chose CMS-Na as disintegrants.
TABLE 2: FORMULATION OF DIFFERENT DISINTEGRANTS AND RESULTS
FORMULATION
INGREDIENTS (mg) |
F5 | F7 | F8 | F9 | F10 | F11 |
Pidotimod | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 |
MCC | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 |
Mannitol | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 |
PVPP | 80 | 100 | 120 | - | - | - |
CMS-Na | - | - | - | 80 | 100 | 120 |
Lactose | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 |
Aspartame | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
Megnesium stearate | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
6%PVP 50% ethanol solution | Appropriate amount | Appropriate amount | Appropriate amount | Appropriate amount | Appropriate amount | Appropriate amount |
Results | ||||||
Dissolution (%) | 85.2 | 89.6 | 96.4 | 87.6 | 91.8 | 97.1 |
CONCLUSION: The results showed that the optimum proportion was 400mg pidotimod, 120mg MCC, 80mg mannitol, 120mg CMS-Na, 60mg lactose, 20mg aspartame, 10mg magnesium stearate and 6%PVP 50% ethanol solution. Pidotimod dispersible tablets with optimum proportion showed acceptable hardness, friability, dissolution behavior. The preparation process was simple and the tablets could be prepared by ordinary tablet production equipment. So it is suitable for mass industrialized production. The final tableting formulation and the simplified process both had tremendous potentials in commercial large-scale production.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: This work was supported by the Talent Introduction Program of Hebei University (No. y2005064) and by a grant of the Medical and Engineering Science Research Center of Hebei University (No. BM201109).
REFERENCES:
- Du Xiao F, Jiang CZ, Wu CF, Won EK and Choung SY: Synergistic immunostimulatory effect of pidotimod and red ginseng acidic polysaccharide on humoral immunity of immunosuppressed mice. Pharmazie 2008; 63: 904–908.
- Giagulli C, Noerder M, Avolio M, Becker PD, Fiorentini S, Guzman CA and Caruso A: Pidotimod promotes functional maturation of dendritic cells and displays adjuvant properties at the nasal mucosa level. Int Immunopharmacol 2009; 9: 1366–1373.
- Capsoni F, Minonzio F and Mongari A: Evaulation of the kinetics of the imunomodulation activity of pidotimod on human. Neutrophils pharmacol, Res 1992; 26(2): 172
- Zhao Y, Huang B, Huang S, Zheng H, Li YQ, Lun ZR, Shen J, Wang Y, Kasper LH and Lu F. Evaluation of the adjuvant effect of pidotimod on the immune protection induced by UV-attenuated Toxoplasma gondii in mouse models. Parasitol Res 2013; 112(9): 3151-3160.
- Carta S, Silvestri M and Rossi GA. Modulation of airway epithelial cell functions by Pidotimod: NF-kB cytoplasmatic expression and its nuclear translocation are associated with an increased TLR-2 expression. Ital J Pediatr 2013;39: 29.
- Riboldi P, Gerosa M and Meroni PL. Pidotimod: A reappraisal. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2009; 22(2): 255–262.
- Qi X, Wang L and Zhu J. Water-In-Oil-In-Water Double Emulsions: An Excellent Delivery System for Improving the Oral Bioavailability of Pidotimod in Rats. J Pharm Sci 2011; 100(6): 2203-2211.
- Mailland F, Coppi G and Silingardi S. Pharmacokinetics and oral bioavailability of pidotimod in humans. Arzneimit- telforschung 1994; 44(12A):1465-1469.
- Shah S, Madan S and Agrawal S. Formulation and evaluation of microsphere based oro dispersible tablets of itopride hcl. Daru 2012; 20(1): 20-24.
- Tan Q, Zhang L, Zhang L, Teng Y and Zhang J. Design and evaluation of an economic taste-masked dispersible tablet of pyridostigmine bromide, a highly soluble drug with an extremely bitter taste. Chem Pharm Bull 2012; 60(12): 1514-1521.
- Chang R-K, Guo X, Burnside BA and Couch RA. Fast-dissolving tablets. Pharm Technol Eur 2000; 12 (6): 52–58.
- Dobetti L. Fast-melting tablets: developments and technologies. Pharm Technol Eur 2000; 12 (9): 32–42.
- Kremzar L, Mohar M, Fercej-Temeljotov D and Kofler B. Formulation of dispersible nabumetone tablets. Acta Pharm Zagreb 1998; 48(3): 187-192.
- Borrmann S, Sallas WM, Machevo S, González R, Björkman A, Mårtensson A, Hamel M, Juma E, Peshu J, Ogutu B, Djimdé A, D’Alessandro U, Marrast AC, Lefèvre G and Kern SE. The effect of food consumption on lumefantrine bioavailability in African children receiving artemether-lumefantrine crushed or dispersible tablets (Coartem) for acute uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Trop Med Int Health 2010; 15: 434–441.
- Ostrowski M, Wilkowska E and Baczek T. In vivo-in vitro correlation for amoxicillin trihydrate 1000 mg dispersible tablet. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2009; 35: 981–985.
How to cite this article:
Hu L, Gu D and Hu Q: Formulation and in vitro evaluation of Pidotimod Dispersible Tablets. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2014; 5(2): 346-49.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.5(2).346-49
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
6
346-349
372KB
2132
English
IJPSR
Liandong Hu *, Deliang Gu, Qiaofeng Hu
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences & Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Quality Control of Hebei Province, Hebei University, No.180, WuSi Road, Baoding, PR China
hbupharm@126.com
21 August, 2013
06 December, 2013
15 January, 2014
http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.5(2).346-49
01 February, 2014