FORMULATION AND IN VITRO EVALUATION OF SALBUTAMOL SULPHATE SUSTAINED RELEASE TABLET BY USING FLOATING DRUG DELIVERY TECHNOLOGY
HTML Full TextFORMULATION AND IN VITRO EVALUATION OF SALBUTAMOL SULPHATE SUSTAINED RELEASE TABLET BY USING FLOATING DRUG DELIVERY TECHNOLOGY
Arup Ratan Deb*1, Padmakana Malakar 2, Nilufa Yeasmin 2 and Siraj Ahmed 2
Department of Pharmaceutics, Moonray Institute Pharmaceutical Sciences 1, Mahbubnagar, Andhra Pradesh, India
Department of Pharmaceutics, Azad College of Pharmacy 2, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
ABSTRACT: The present study involves in the preparation and evaluation of floating tablets of Salbutamol sulphate by direct compression method by using the hydrophilic polymer such as hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose (HPMC), Sodium carboxy methyl cellulose, Dextrin and Carbopol. Sodium bicarbonate, Tartaric acid and citric acid were incorporated as gas generating agent. The study aims to achieve different formulations using different polymers in order to find out the most suitable and successful type of polymer. The prepared tablets were evaluated in terms of thickness, average weight, hardness, friability, drug content uniformity, swelling index, in- vitro buoyancy study and in-vitro dissolution study. The formulated tablet Hardness was found to being the range of 2.6 to 3.8 kg/cm2, the % friability was in the range of 0.30 to 0.50. The Swelling Index and floating time of different formulations range from 1.78 to 16.15 and 8.15 to 12 hrs respectively. In-vitro release studies were carried out using USP XXII dissolution test apparatus. The tablet containing Salbutamol sulphate was released from batch F1-F10 found to be 78.55 to 98.55 %. The release of drug from tablets sufficiently sustained for 8 hours by in vitro release study. From the ten formulations we found that the formulation containing Carbopol (F7) were showed the better sustain release when compared to the other formulations.
Keywords: |
Floating tablet, Salbutamol, Carbopol, HPMC
INTRODUCTION:Salbutamol sulphate is one of the widely used drugs for the treatment of bronchial asthma, chronic bronchitis and emphysema 1. The drug undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism and thus requires frequent administrations by oral route 2.
Salbutamol sulphate has a site-specific absorption in stomach and upper part of small intestine 3. Reported oral bioavailability of Salbutamol sulphate is ~ 40 %; due to extensive metabolism via intestinal sulphonation, first pass metabolism in liver & also degradation in colon 4. The metabolism is due to extensive sulphonation in gut as compared to liver 5. The half-life of Salbutamol sulphate is about 4.5 hrs 6. The relatively short term acting injectables and aerosol dosage forms of Salbutamol sulphate are recommended for instant relief in severe asthmatic attacks. Salbutamol sulphate is available in the form of aerosols.
The recommended dose in adults and children is 2-3 inhalations every 4-6 h. More frequent administration is not recommended 7. Salbutamol sulphate is given by mouth in a dose of 2 to 4 mg three to four times a day 8. Salbutamol sulphate requires multiple daily drug dosage in order to maintain adequate plasma concentrations. A gastro retentive drug delivery system may be advantageous over conventional oral dosage forms and inhalers due to its ability to maintain prolonged therapeutic concentrations in the systemic circulation. Asthma being a chronic disease, and as most of the patients suffer from nocturnal attacks 9, there is need for drug delivery systems which maintains therapeutic concentrations for long duration.
Floating drug delivery systems (FDDS) were first described by Davis in 1968. These systems were used to prolong the gastric residence time of drug delivery systems. They remain buoyant in the stomach for prolonged period of time without affecting the gastric emptying rate of other contents 10. FDDS is suitable for drugs with an absorption window in the stomach or the upper small intestine 11, for drugs which act locally in the stomach 12 and for drugs that are poorly soluble or unstable in the intestinal fluid 13. These systems help in continuously releasing the drug before it reaches the absorption window, thus ensuring optimal bioavailability 14. FDDS or hydrodynamically balanced systems have a bulk density lower than gastric fluid and thus remain buoyant in the stomach without affecting the gastric emptying rate for a prolonged period of time 15. Therefore, Salbutamol sulphate has all the characteristics suitable for developing floating dosage form which would increase its oral bioavailability. These systems help in continuously releasing the drug before it reaches the absorption window, thus ensuring optimal bioavailability. High solubility of Salbutamol sulphate was a major challenge in designing its controlled drug delivery system. In this study, methyl cellulose, HPMC, Carbopol and sodium alginate were used as a release-retarding polymer. In order to develop the floating matrix tablet of Salbutamol sulphate it is necessary to optimize both the residence time of the system in the gastro intestinal tract and release rate of the drug from the dosage.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Materials: Salbutamol sulphate obtained as gift sample from Sumac Pharma Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad. The polymers Methylcellulose, HPMC, Microcrystalline cellulose were as gift samples from Micro Laboratory Limited, Bangalore. All other ingredients were of analytical grades and were used as procured.
Formulation of Floating Sustained Release Tablets: Floating matrix tablets were prepared by direct compression using different polymers like HPMC, Sodium carboxy methyl cellulose, Carbopol and other polymers. The compositions of the formulations are given in Table 1.
TABLE 1: FORMULATION OF SALBUTAMOL FLOATING SUSTAINED RELEASE TABLETS
Sl. No. | Ingredients | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 | F9 | F10 |
Salbutamol | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | |
HPMC | 100 | - | 125 | 200 | 200 | - | - | 100 | 130 | - | |
Na CMC | 150 | 250 | 125 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Peg 6000 | - | - | - | 50 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Sodium Alginate | - | - | - | - | 50 | - | 50 | - | - | - | |
MCC | - | - | - | - | - | 200 | - | - | - | - | |
NaHCO3 | - | - | - | - | - | 50 | - | 50 | 65 | 50 | |
Carbopol | - | - | - | - | - | - | 200 | - | - | - | |
Dextrin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20 | 20 | - | |
Cetyl Alcohol | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 80 | - | ||
Polyvinyl Alcohol | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 75 | |
Citric Acid | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 35 | - | |
Tartaric Acid | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 50 | |
Shell Lac | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 75 | |
Maize Starch | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | |
Lactose | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | 150 | |
Talc | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | |
Magnesium Stearate | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Evaluation of the Floating Sustained Release Tablets of Salbutamol sulphate:
Pre-compression Parameter:
A) Angle of Repose 16: The frictional forces in a loose powder or granules can be measured by angle of repose. “This is the maximum angle possible between the surface of a pile of powder or granules and the horizontal plane”. The granules were allowed to flow through the funnel fixed to a stand at definite height (h). The angle of repose was then calculated by measuring the height and radius of the heap of granules formed.
θ = tan-1 (h/r)
Where θ = angle of repose; h = height; r = radius
B) Compressibility index 17, 18: The flow ability of powder were evaluated by comparing the bulk density (d0) and taped density (df) of powder and the rate at which it packed down. Compressibility index is calculated by,
Compressibility index (%) =
Where do = bulk density, df = tapped density
Post-compression parameters 19, 20:
A) Tablet dimensions: Thickness and diameter were measured using a calibrated dial caliper. Three tablets of each formulation were taken randomly and thickness was measured individually.
B) Hardness: Hardness indicates the ability of a tablet to withstand mechanical shocks while handling. The hardness of the tablets was determined using Monsanto hardness tester. It is expressed in kg/cm2. Three tablets were randomly picked and hardness of the tablets was determined.
C) Friability test: The friability of tablets was determined using Roche friabilator. It is expressed in percentage (%). Ten tablets were initially weighed (W0 initial) and transferred into friabilator. The friabilator was operated at 25 rpm for 4 minutes or run up to 100 revolutions. The tablets were weighed again (W final). The % friability was then calculated by,
Percentage of friability = 100 (1-W0/W)
Percentage friability of tablets less than 1% is considered acceptable.
D) Tablet density 18: Tablet density is an important parameter for floating tablets. The tablet will float when its density is less than that of gastric fluid (1.004g/cc). The density was determined using following formula.
V = πr2h
d = m/v
Where V = volume of tablet (cc); r = radius of tablet (cm); h = crown thickness of tablet (mm); m = mass of tablet
E) Weight variation test 18: Twenty tablets were selected randomly from each batch and weighed individually to check for weight variation. The following percentage deviation in weight variation is allowed.
F) Buoyancy / floating test 21, 22, 28: The time between introduction of dosage form and its buoyancy on the simulated gastric fluid and the time during which the dosage form remain buoyant were measured. The time taken for dosage form to emerge on surface of medium called Floating Lag Time (FLT) or Buoyancy Lag Time (BLT) and total duration of time by which dosage form remain buoyant is called Total Floating Time (TFT).
G) Swelling study 23, 24: The swelling behaviour of a dosage form is measured by studying its weight gain or water uptake. The dimensional changes measured in terms of the increase in tablet diameter and/or thickness over time. Swelling Index is measured in terms of percent by using following formula.
Swelling Index = x 100 and;
Swelling Index = x 100
H) Test for content uniformity 25: Weigh and powder 20 tablets, weigh accurately a quantity of powder equivalent to 200mg of Salbutamol sulphate, shake with 70 ml of water and diluted to 100 ml with water. Dilute 10 ml of the stock and diluted to 100ml with water. Further dilute 10 ml to 100ml and measure the absorbance at about 525nm.
I) In-vitro drug release study 26, 27: 400ml of 0.1N HCl was taken in a beaker and Teflon was placed in it. Then one tablet was taken and placed into it. The rpm of stirred was settled at 50 rpm and temperature 370+20C.After 1hr 7ml of dissolution medium was taken out. The medium was again replaced with 0.1N HCl. The samples were collected at every 1hr internal up to 8hr. To the collected samples 1ml of 3%sodium nitrate, 1ml of copper sulphate and 0.2ml of 1N HCl were added. Then it was warmed on a water bath for 10min and cooled to room temperature. Then the final volume is made up to 10 ml with 0.1N HCl. After 25 min the absorbance was measured at 525 nm against blank.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Floating tablets of Salbutamol sulphate were prepared and evaluated to increase its bioavailability. In the present study ten formulations using different polymer with variable concentration were prepared and evaluated for physico-chemical, in-vitro drug release studies.
Standard calibration curve of Salbutamol sulphate: Standard calibration curve of Salbutamol sulphate was determined by plotting absorbance Vs. concentration at 525nm and it follows the Beer’s law. The results were show in Table 2 and Fig. 1.
TABLE 2: CALIBRATION CURVE OF SALBUTAMOL SULPHATE AT 525nm BY UV SPECTROPHOTO METER
Sl. No | Concentration in mcg/ml | Absorbance at 525nm |
1 | 50 | 0.364 |
2 | 100 | 0.456 |
3 | 150 | 0.552 |
4 | 200 | 0.643 |
5 | 250 | 0.734 |
FIGURE 1: STANDARD CURVE OF SALBUTAMOL
Pre-compression parameters: The values obtained for angle of repose and compressibility index for all formulations were found to be in the range from 24.30±1.26 to 29.88±1.84 and 12.30±0.60% to 16.34± 0.56% respectively. This indicates good flow property of the powder blend for direct compression. The data for angle of repose and compressibility index was given in Table 3.
TABLE 3: EVALUATION OF POWDER OF FLOATING TABLET
Sl. No. | Formulation Code | ⃰Angle of Repose (θ) (S.D. ±) | ⃰Compressibility index(%) (S.D. ±) |
1 | F1 | 24.30±1.26 | 12.30±0.60 |
2 | F2 | 26.77±0.68 | 15.67±0.36 |
3 | F3 | 25.77±2.69 | 16.34±0.56 |
4 | F4 | 28.56±3.05 | 15.41±0.79 |
5 | F5 | 29.88±1.84 | 13.25±0.84 |
6 | F6 | 24.36±1.9 | 14.16±0.67 |
7 | F7 | 25.22±2.10 | 12.45±0.35 |
8 | F8 | 27.29±2.35 | 15.56±0.26 |
9 | F9 | 26.54±2.57 | 14.48±0.29 |
10 | F10 | 28.48±2.09 | 14.85±0.24 |
⃰Each sample was analysed in triplicate (n=3)
Post-compression parameters: Microscopic examination of tablets from each formulation batch showed circular shape with no cracks. The dimensions determined for formulated tablets were almost uniform in all the ten formulations and were found to be in the range of 4.025 mm to 4.034 mm. The diameter of the tablet ranges between 13.50 mm to 13.60 mm. The measured hardness of tablets of each batch ranged between 4.20 to 4.80 kg/cm2. The values of friability test were less than 1% in all the formulations ensuring that the tablets were mechanically stable. The percentage weight variations for all formulations were within the Pharmacopoeial limits of ±5% of the weight. The weights of all the tablets were found to be uniform with low standard deviation values.The percentage of drug content was found to be between 97.26±2.41% and 98.91±2.26% of Salbutamol sulphate, which was within acceptable limits. Tablet dimensions, Hardness, Friability, Weight variation and Drug content uniformity of the tablets are listed in Table 4.
TABLE 4: EVALUATION OF FLOATING TABLET
Formulation code | Diameter | Thickness | Hardness | Friability | ⃰Weight of the tablet (%Deviation±) | ⃰Drug content |
F1 | 13.58 | 4.032 | 2.6 | 0.5 | 496±0.4542 | 98.14±2.92 |
F2 | 13.54 | 4.030 | 3.2 | 0.3 | 499±0.3212 | 97.26±2.41 |
F3 | 13.50 | 4.025 | 3.4 | 0.3 | 510±0.1021 | 98.41±2.48 |
F4 | 13.58 | 4.032 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 492±0.5201 | 97.37±1.89 |
F5 | 13.60 | 4.034 | 3.0 | 0.4 | 486±0.3257 | 98.91±2.26 |
F6 | 13.54 | 4.030 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 495±0.6544 | 97.51±2.15 |
F7 | 13.50 | 4.025 | 3.8 | 0.3 | 497±0.7782 | 97.74±2.01 |
F8 | 13.52 | 4.027 | 3.4 | 0.2 | 501±0.1323 | 97.63±1.77 |
F9 | 13.58 | 4.032 | 3.6 | 0.4 | 494±0.1432 | 97.82±2.22 |
F10 | 13.54 | 4.030 | 3.4 | 0.4 | 495±0.2432 | 97.52±3.01 |
⃰Each sample was analysed in triplicate (n=3)
To provide good floating behavior in the stomach, the density of the device should be less than that of the gastric contents (1.004g/cm3). All the batches showed density below than that of gastric fluid (1.004). On immersion in 0.1N HCl solution (pH 1.2) at 370C, the tablets floated, and remained buoyant without disintegration. From the results it can be concluded that the batch containing HPMC polymers showed good buoyancy lag time (BLT) and total floating time (TFT). Formulation F7 containing Carbopol showed good BLT of 106 sec and TFT of more than 13 hrs. Carbopol was used as release retardant and it also provided an additional gelatinous layer to the formulation. Tablet density, Buoyancy lag time, Total floating time and Swelling Index is given in Table 5.
TABLE 5: TABLET DENSITY, BUOYANCY LAG TIME, TOTAL FLOATING TIME AND SWELLING INDEX
Formulation Code | Tablet Density (gm/cc) | Bouncy Lag Time (sec) | Total Floating Time (hrs) | Swelling Index (%) | |
Thickness | Diameter | ||||
F1 | 0.97 | 72 | >10 | 34.42 | 08.54 |
F2 | 0.92 | 56 | >8 | 26.05 | 03.84 |
F3 | 0.96 | 75 | >11 | 15.77 | 01.78 |
F4 | 0.90 | 101 | >12 | 30.95 | 06.04 |
F5 | 0.99 | 98 | >11 | 27.42 | 03.82 |
F6 | 0.98 | 77 | >10 | 16.63 | 02.81 |
F7 | 0.93 | 106 | >13 | 55.03 | 16.15 |
F8 | 0.97 | 97 | >10 | 12.74 | 04.44 |
F9 | 0.95 | 81 | >12 | 44.84 | 13.55 |
F10 | 0.98 | 73 | >8 | 16.13 | 04.87 |
Results of in-vitro drug release studies indicated that the F7 (Carbopol-200 mg, Sodium Alginate-50 mg) and F9 (Dextrin 20 mg, HPMC 130 mg) had good sustained release. From the in-vitro dissolution data it was found that formulation F1, F3, F4, F5 and F8 containing HPMC released 85%, 85%, 88.55%, 90% and 98% respectively of drug within 8 hr of the study indicating that the polymer amount is not sufficient to control the drug release. F7 containing Carbopol (200 mg) alone released 78.55% of drug within 8 hrs. It concludes F7 had better-sustained release than the other formulation (F1 to F9). The optimized formulation F7 had better control over release rate. Percentage cumulative drug release of various Formulations (F1-F10) is given in the Table 6 and Fig 2.
TABLE 6: PERCENTAGE CUMULATIVE DRUG RELEASE FROM FORMULATIONS (F1-F10)
Sl. No. | Time in hrs | 1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 | F9 | F10 |
1 | 22.85 | 31.40 | 22.85 | 28.60 | 28.60 | 30.00 | 22.85 | 32.85 | 22.85 | 38.55 | |
2 | 38.00 | 41.45 | 38.00 | 37.15 | 38.55 | 40.00 | 30.00 | 42.85 | 35.70 | 50.00 | |
3 | 41.45 | 51.45 | 41.45 | 44.30 | 45.70 | 51.45 | 38.55 | 52.85 | 44.30 | 61.40 | |
4 | 51.45 | 62.85 | 51.45 | 52.85 | 55.70 | 62.85 | 44.30 | 64.30 | 47.15 | 68.55 | |
5 | 62.85 | 71.45 | 62.85 | 64.30 | 67.15 | 71.45 | 52.85 | 72.85 | 55.70 | 74.30 | |
6 | 71.45 | 80.00 | 71.45 | 71.45 | 78.55 | 81.45 | 62.85 | 84.30 | 65.70 | 80.00 | |
7 | 80.00 | 85.70 | 80.00 | 84.30 | 85.70 | 85.70 | 68.55 | 90.00 | 72.85 | 92.85 | |
8 | 85.00 | 98.55 | 85.00 | 88.55 | 90.00 | 91.14 | 78.55 | 98.00 | 84.30 | 98.55 |
FIGURE 2: COMPARISON OF IN VITRO RELEASE OF SALBUTAMOL FLOATING TABLETS FORMULATION (F1-F10)
CONCLUSION: It was concluded that preformulation study was done initially and results directed the further course of formulation. The tablets were formulated using various concentrations of polymers such as HPMC, NaCMC, Sodium Alginate, Dextrin and Carbopol and effervescing agent (sodium bicarbonate).
Results of in-vitro drug release studies indicated that the F7 (Carbopol-200 mg, Sodium Alginate-50 mg) and F9 (Dextrin 20 mg, HPMC 130 mg) had good sustained release. From the in-vitro dissolution data it was found that formulation F1, F3, F4, F5 and F8 containing HPMC released 85%, 85%, 88.55%, 90% and 98% respectively of drug within 8 hr of the study indicating that the polymer amount is not sufficient to control the drug release.
F7 containing Carbopol (200 mg) alone released 78.55% of drug within 8 hrs. It concludes F7 had better-sustained release than the other formulation (F1 to F9). The optimized formulation F7 had better control over release rate.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The authors are thankful to Sumac Pharma Pvt. Ltd. in Hyderabad for Sulbutamol sulphate given as a gift sample and to Management of Moonray Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences for providing all the necessary facilities to carry out the work.
REFERENCES:
- Kelly HW and Murphy S: Beta-adrenergic agonists for acute, severe asthma. Ann. Pharmacother 1992; 26: 81–91.
- Ahrens RC and Smith GD: Albuterol: an adrenergic agent for use in the treatment of asthma pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and clinical use. Pharmacotherapy 1984; 4:105–121.
- Swarbrick J, Boylon JC: Encyclopedia of Pharmaceutical Technology. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York Edition 2, Vol. 1, 2002: 896.
- Goldstein DA, Tan YK and Soldin SJ: Pharmacokinetics and absolute bioavailability of Salbutamol in healthy adult volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1987; 32: 631-634.
- Pacifici GM, Giulianetti B and Quilici MC: Salbutamol sulphate in the human liver and duodenal mucosa: interindividual variability. Xenobiotica 1997; 27: 279-286.
- Amperiadou A and Georgarakis M: Controlled release Salbutamol sulphate microcapsules prepared by emulsion solvent-evaporation technique and study on the release affected parameters. Int J Pharm 1995; 115: 1-8.
- Fishwick D, Bradshaw L and Macdonald C: Cumulative single-dose design to assess the bronchodilator effects of beta2- agonists in individuals with asthma. Am J Resp Crit Med 2001; 163: 474–477.
- Lipworth BJ, Clark RA, Dhillon DP, Charter MK, Palmer JBD, McDevitt DG. Single dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics of 4 mg and 8 mg oral salbutamol controlled-release in patients with bronchial asthma. Eur J Clin Pharmaco 1989; 37, 49.
- Crescioli S, Dal CA and Maestrelli P. Controlled release theophylline inhibits early morning airway obstruction and hyper responsiveness in asthmatic subjects. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1996; 77: 106–110.
- Villafuerte RL, Quirino BT and Jimenez MI: Sustained delivery of captopril from floating matrix tablets. Int J Pharm 2008; 362: 37-43.
- Rouge N, Buri P and Doelkar E: Drug absorption sites in the gastrointestinal tract and dosage for site-specific delivery. Int J Pharm 1996; 136: 117-139.
- Umamaheshwari RB, Jain S and Bhadra D: Floating microspheres bearing acetohyxamic acid for the treatment of Helicobactor pylori. J Pharm Pharmacol 2003; 55: 1607-1613.
- Jain SK, Awasthi AM and Jain NK: Calcium silicate based microspheres of repiglinide for gastroretentive floating drug delivery: Preparation and in vitro characterization. J Control Rel 2005; 107: 300-309.
- Dave BS, Amin AF and Patel MM: Gastroretentive drug delivery system of ranitidine hydrochloride: formulation and in vitro evaluation. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech2004; 5(2): 34.
- Singh BN and Kim KH: Floating drug delivery systems: an approach to oral controlled drug delivery via gastric retention. J Control Rel 2000; 63: 235-259.
- Aulton ME: Pharmaceutics: The science of dosage form design. Churchill Livingstone, London, Edition 2, 2002: 322-334
- Colorcon: Federal Register. Methocel, Vol. 60(230), 1995; 61642.
- Govt of India, Ministry of Health and Welfare: Indian pharmacopoeia, The Controller of Publication, Vol. II, 1996; 734-36.
- Leon Lachman, Herbert A, Liberman: The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy: 293-302.
- Dave BS, Amin AF, Patel MM: Gastroretentive drug delivery system of ranitidine hydrochloride: formulation and in-vitro evaluation. AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech. 2004; 5(2): 1-6.
- Shweta Arora: Floating drug delivery: A review. AAPS Pharmscitech 2005; 47
- Chawla G, Gupta P, Koradia V, Bansal A: Gastroretention : a means to address regional variability in intestinal drug absorption. Pharm. Tech. 2003; 50-68.
- Naim S, Samuel B: Effect of potassium chloride and cationic drug on swelling, erosion and release from K- carrageenan matrices. AAPS Pharmscitech 2004; 5(2): 25.
- Thomas Durig and Reza Fassihi: Evaluation of floating and sticking extended release delivery system: an unconventional dissolution test. Journal of controlled release 2000; 67: 37-44.
- Dr. Shenoy: Hand book Pharmaceutical Chemicals. Multitech Publication 2000; 204
- Mukesh C and Ghoshal: A more relevant dissolution method for evaluation of floating drug delivery system. Dissolution Technologies 2004.
- Patel VF and Patel N M: Studies on formulation and evaluation of ranitidine floating tablets. Ind. J.Pharm.Sci. 2005.
- Chein YW: Novel drug delivery systems. Marcel Dekker, New York, Edition 2 1992: 4-56.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
How to cite this article:
Deb AR, Malakar P, Yeasmin N and Ahmed S: Formulation and in vitro evaluation of Salbutamol sulphate Sustained Release Tablet by using Floating Drug Delivery Technology. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2013: 4(9); 3575-3581. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR. 0975-8232.4(9).3575-81
Article Information
39
3575-3581
524KB
1399
English
IJPSR
Arup Ratan Deb*, Padmakana Malakar , Nilufa Yeasmin and Siraj Ahmed
Department of Pharmaceutics, Moonray Institute Pharmaceutical Sciences , Mahbubnagar, Andhra Pradesh, India
ard.pharma11@gmail.com
14 April, 2013
10 June, 2013
14 August, 2013
http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.4(9).3575-81
01 September, 2013