FORMULATION AND IN-VITRO OPTIMIZATION OF EXTENDED RELEASE TABLETS OF PRAMIPEXOLE DIHYDROCHLORIDE MONOHYDRATE FOR PARKINSON’S DISEASE
HTML Full TextReceived on 10 October, 2013; received in revised form, 28 November, 2013; accepted, 10 February, 2014; published 01 March, 2013
FORMULATION AND IN-VITRO OPTIMIZATION OF EXTENDED RELEASE TABLETS OF PRAMIPEXOLE DIHYDROCHLORIDE MONOHYDRATE FOR PARKINSON’S DISEASE
T. Sudhamani*1, Jeevan Kumar Dande 1 and S. Rajarajan 2
Department of Pharmaceutics 1, Department of Pharmacy Practice 2, The Erode College of Pharmacy and Research, Vepampalayam, Vallipurathanpalyam (po), Erode – 638 112, Tamil Nadu, India
ABSTRACT: The main aim of the extended release tablets is to reduce the dose frequency and to improve the patient compliance. The objective of the present study was to formulate and optimize the extended release tablets of Pramipexole dihydrochloride monohydrate for 24hrs, which made the advantage of this formulation as once daily with more patient compliance. The combination of different hydrophilic polymers and hydrophobic polymer in varying concentrations were used to get the desired extended release profile over a period of 24 h. The drug and excipients mixed granules was subjected to evaluate the physical properties like angle of repose, bulk density, compressibility index were found to be satisfactory. The hydrophilic polymer Hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose (HPMC K200M) at 41.7% and( HPMC E 3LV) at 5% in combination with hydrophobic polymer (Eudragit L100) at 5% level produced desired extended release Pramipexole dihydrochloride monohydrate matrix tablets. The in vitro drug release of optimized formulation (F9) was 99% and was more release than innovator product of Mirapex ER (94.5%) which extended up to 24 h. The drug release pattern from the optimized matrix formulation (F9) was diffusion controlled obeying Higuchi equation, and by Non-Fickian mechanism obeying Koresemeyer – Peppa’s equation. The innovator product Mirapex ER (0.375mg) drug release profiles were shown to be followed first order release kinetics. The prepared once daily extended release Pramipexole dihydrochloride monohydrate tablets in combination of hydrophilic (HPMC K200M), (HPMC E 3LV) and hydrophobic (Eudragit L100) polymers, is a suitable one to treat the Parkinson’s disease.
Keywords: |
Extended release tablets, Pramipexole dihydrochloride monohydrate, hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose, Eudragit L100
INTRODUCTION:Parkinsonism also known as Parkinson’s syndrome, atypical Parkinson’s, or secondary Parkinson’s is a neurodegenerative disorder. It is characterized by tremor, hypokinesia, rigidity, and postural instability.
Many factors are directly or indirectly leads to Parkinson’s disease (PD), especially environmental factors like pesticides, herbicides, trace metals, cyanides and genetic factors of parkinsonism with an autosomal-dominant pattern of inheritance. Approximately 4.5 to 16 per 100.000 persons / year are estimated incidence of PD. In the US the prevalence of PD is between 175 to 350 / 100000 population. Parkinson’s disease is also associated with eventual disability or death. Untreated PD had a mortality rate of 80 % within 10 years of diagnosis, but even successfully treated PD patients without dementia still experience a shortened life span. Since the introduction of PD, Dopaminergic pharmacotherapy remains the mainstay of the treatment of motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease 1. Recently, Pramipexole dihydrochloride monohydrate controlled release form was approved in the United States for treatment as monotherapy in early PD 2, 3. Sleepiness and leg edema are most common Side effects of Pramipexole dihydrochloride monohydrate that appear to occur more frequently than seen with other dopamine agonists 4, 5, 6, 7.
Once a day extended release (ER) forms offer patients a more convenient alternative when compared to immediate release forms because of reduced dose frequency, in immediate release forms of Pramipexole dihydrochloride monohydrate is used three times daily. Various water soluble or swellable polymers with high molecular weight such as hydroxyl propyl methyl cellulose (HPMC), hydroxyl propyl cellulose (HPC) and polyethylene oxide (PEO) have been used in hydrophilic matrices 8, 9, 10.
Hydrophobic polymers, along with a hydrophilic matrix are suitable for drugs with high water solubility to develop extended release dosage forms. Hydrophobic polymers like Eudragit L 100 provide several advantages; it shows good stability at varying pH values and low moisture level. Eudragit L 100 is anionic copolymer based on methacrylic acid and methyl methacrylate. Hence, in the present work, an attempt has been made to develop once daily extended release matrix tablets of Pramipexole dihydrochloride monohydrate using hydrophilic polymers such as hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) along with hydrophobic anionic polymer like Eudragit L-100.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pramipexole dihydrochloride monohydrate was generous gift sample by Eros Pharma, Bangalore, Lactose monohydrate obtained from Kelco Pharma, Mumbai, Microcrystalline cellulose pH 101 and Eudragit L100 obtained from Rohm Pharma, Mumbai, HPMC K 4 M, HPMC K 200M, HPMC K4M, HPMC 3LV, Povidone K 90, Micro Crystalline Cellulose 112, Aerosil 200 and Stearic acid were kindly donated from S.D fine Chem, Mumbai.
Procedure for Formulation of Extended Release Matrix Tablets: Conventional wet granulation technology was opted for preparing the extended release tablets of Pramipexole dihydrochloride monohydrate. Drug and intragranular excipients such as lactose monohydrate, microcrystalline cellulose, HPMC K4M, HPMC 3LV and Eudragit L 100 were shifted through #40 mesh and were blended together to produce 100 tablets. The aqueous solution of PVP K 90 (1: 9) was added to produce damp mass. The wet mass was passed through # 16 mesh and dried in hot air oven at 65oC for 1 hr. The dried granules were then passed through # 20 and # 40. Aerosil200 and stearic acid were passed through # 80.
The extra-granular materials such as HPMC K200 M, microcrystalline cellulose 112 were weighed and mixed with above dried granule for 5 min. The final blend was evaluated for angle of repose, bulk, tapped density to determine the flow properties. Prepared granules were compressed using 9.5 mm flat punches on 15 station rotary tablet compression machine (Cadmach). The tablets were evaluated in terms of physicochemical parameters like weight variation, friability, hardness, thickness and in-vitro dissolution. The formulae for preparation of matrix based extended release tablets of Pramipexole dihydrochloride monohydrate with different concentrations of HPMC and Eudragit L100 polymers are given in Table 1.
Evaluation of Granules:
Angle of Repose: By usingthe funnel method the angle of repose of granules was determined and it was calculated using the following equation 11.
θ = tan-1(h/r)
Where, h and r are the height and radius of the powder cone respectively.
Bulk Density and Tapped Density: Both bulk density (BD) and tapped density (TD) were determined and calculated using the following formulas 12, 13.
BD = Powder weight/volume of the packing; TD = Powder weight /tapped volume of the packing
TABLE 1: COMPOSITION FOR EXTENDED RELEASE TABLETS OF PRAMIPEXOLE DIHYDROCHLORIDE MONOHYDRATE
Name of the ingredients (mg) | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 | F9 |
Intragranular | |||||||||
Pramipexole diHCl monohydrate | 0.375 | 0.375 | 0.375 | 0.375 | 0.375 | 0.375 | 0.375 | 0.375 | 0.375 |
Lactose monohydrate | 17.22 | - | 17.22 | 29.32 | 41.22 | 61.12 | 61.12 | 41.22 | 19.22 |
MCC PH101 | 40 | 40 | 85.6 | 73.6 | 67.6 | - | - | - | - |
Eudragit L 100 | - | - | 12 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 12 |
HPMC E 3LV | 2.4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 12 |
Povidone K 90 | - | 19.62 | - | - | - | 4.8 | 4 | 3.6 | 3.5 |
HPMC K4M | - | - | 4.8 | 4.8 | 4.8 | - | - | - | - |
Purified water | q.s | q.s | q.s | q.s | q.s | q.s | q.s | q.s | q.s |
Extragranular | |||||||||
HPMC K 200 | 120 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 120 | 120 | 150 |
MCC 112 | 52.8 | 72.8 | 12.8 | 12.8 | 12.8 | 60.5 | 41.2 | 60.5 | 35.7 |
Aerosil 200 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 4.8 |
Stearic acid | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
TOTAL | 240 | 240 | 240 | 240 | 240 | 240 | 240 | 240 | 240 |
Compressibility Index: The compressibility index of the granules was determined by Carr’s compressibility index 14.
Carr’s index (%) = [(TBD – LBD)/TBD] × 100
Hausner’s ratio: The Hausner’s ratio of the granules was calculated by the formulae.
Hausner’s ratio = Tapped density
Bulk density
Evaluation of Tablets:
Weight variation: In each batch 20 tablets were individually weighed in grams on an electronic balance. The average weight was reported.
Tablet thickness: The thickness of 10 tablets was measured individually in millimetres by using a digital micrometer. The average thickness was reported.
Tablet hardness: Tablet hardness was measured by using a Monsanto hardness tester. 10 tablets of known weight and thickness were subjected to crushing and the crushing strength of each was recorded in kg/cm2, and the average hardness was reported.
Friability: Twenty (20) tablets were selected from each batch and weighed. Each group of tablets was rotated at 25 rpm for 4 minutes (100 rotations) in the tablet friabilator (Electrolab). The tablets were then dusted and reweighed to determine the loss in weight. Friability was then calculated as percent weight loss from the original tablets.
In vitro Drug Release: The in-vitro dissolution profile of each formulation and innovator MIRAPEX ER (0.375mg) was determined on a USP XXIV dissolution apparatus type II by using pH6.8 Phosphate buffer. The Paddle rotation was adjusted to 100 rpm, the temperature being maintained at 37± 0.5ºC throughout the study. 5 ml of the sample of dissolution medium was withdrawn and replaced with the dissolution medium. Samples were filtered through filter paper 41 and were analyzed 1 hr interval spectrophotometrically at 260nm (Shimadzu).
Drug Release Kinetics: The percentage cumulative drug release profiles were plotted in various kinetic models: zero order 15as cumulative amount of drug released vs time, first order 16 as log cumulative percentage of drug remaining vs time, and Higuchi’s model 17, The Hixson-Crowell rate equation 18.
To evaluate the mechanism of drug release from Pramipexole dihydrochloride monohydrate extended release tablets, data was plotted in Korsemeyer equation, as log cumulative percentage of drug released vs log time, and the exponent ‘n’ was calculated through the slope of the straight line.
Mt/M∞ = Ktn
Where, Mt/M∞ is the fractional solute release, t is the release time, K is a kinetic constant characteristic of the drug/polymer system, and n is the diffusional release exponent indicative of drug release mechanism 19. An exponent value of 0.89 is indicative of Case-II Transport or typical zero-order release 20.
Drug excipient compatibility studies:
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR): FTIR spectra for pure drug, physical mixture were recorded using a Fourier transform Infrared spectrophotometer. The analysis was carried out in Shimadzu-IR Affinity 1 Spectrophotometer. The IR spectrum of the samples was prepared using KBr (spectroscopic grade) disks by means of hydraulic pellet press at pressure of seven to ten tons.
Stability studies: The stability of Pramipexole dihydrochloride monohydrate extended release tablets to assess their stability with respect to their physical appearance, drug content and release characteristics after storing at 25oC ± 2oC / 60% RH ± 5% RH, 300c ± 200C/ 65% RH ± 5% RH and 400C ± 20C/75%± 5% RH in properly closed HDPE bottles along with 1 g desiccant for 3 months 21.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Physical characterization of the prepared granules:
Angle of repose: The angle of repose of all the formulations were determined by using funnel method & were found to be 24o62”- 29o21” and found to be within the prescribed IP limits of good flow (20-30).
Bulk and tapped density: The bulk density and tapped density of all the formulations were found to be 0.416-0.458 and 0.454-0.500 respectively.
Carr’s index: The Carr’s index was found to be 1.338- 10.72 and found to be within the prescribed IP limits (limit5 -30).
Hausner’s ratio: The Hausner’s ratio for all the formulations were found to be 1.04-1.12 and Found to be within the prescribed I.P. limits (limit1 – 1.5).
Table 2: Physical characterization of blends Pramipexole dihydrochloride monohydrate extended release formulations
Formulation code | %of fines | Angle of repose (θ) | Bulk density
(gm/cm3) |
Tapped
Density (gm /cm3) |
Carr’s
Index |
Hausner’s
Ratio |
F1 | 18.45 | 24.62 | 0.416 | 0.454 | 1.338 | 1.09 |
F2 | 18.63 | 27.40 | 0.454 | 0.500 | 9.100 | 1.10 |
F3 | 17.71 | 27.11 | 0.416 | 0.454 | 8.330 | 1.09 |
F4 | 20.79 | 28.30 | 0.357 | 0.400 | 10.72 | 1.12 |
F5 | 20.09 | 29.21 | 0.454 | 0.476 | 4.536 | 1.04 |
F6 | 20.62 | 27.29 | 0.416 | 0.454 | 8.330 | 1.09 |
F7 | 20.26 | 26.95 | 0.384 | 0.416 | 7.678 | 1.08 |
F8 | 19.29 | 27.75 | 0.330 | 0.362 | 8.004 | 1.08 |
F9 | 19.15 | 28.39 | 0.458 | 0.500 | 8.250 | 1.09 |
Evaluation of Tablets: The prepared tablets were evaluated for weight variation, friability, thickness and hardness, the results were given in Table 4, the percentage deviation from the average weight was found to be within the prescribed official limits. The tablet hardness was found to be in the range of NLT 15Kg/cm2 and the percentage friability was found to be in the range of 0.013-0.41, fulfilling official requirement (not more than 1%).
TABLE 3: PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE TABLET FORMULATIONS
Physical
Properties |
F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 | F9 |
Weight
Variation (mg) |
239.4 | 239.3 | 239.8 | 239.3 | 239.4 | 239.8 | 240.2 | 240.1 | 240 |
Friability (%) | 0.225 | 0.218 | 0.094 | 0.312 | 0.318 | 0.230 | 0.148 | 0.178 | 0.178 |
Thickness (mm) | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 |
Hardness (kg/cm2) | NLT 15 | NLT 15 | NLT 15 | NLT 15 | NLT 15 | NLT 15 | NLT 15 | NLT 15 | NLT 15 |
In vitro Drug Release: The In vitro dissolution studies were performed for all the formulation of tablets including commercial formulation using USP XXIV type II tablet dissolution tester employing Paddle type at 100 rpm using 900 ml of 6.8 pH phosphate buffers as dissolution medium. Release profile of innovator product Mirapex ER tablets of 0.375mg was performed and described in Table 4. The in vitro drug release profiles of formulation (F9) and innovator product (Mirapex ER tablets, 0.375mg) was shown in Table 4 & Figure 2. From Table 4 & Figure 1, it was evident that formulation F9 having the hydrophilic polymer concentration HPMC K200M at high level (41.7 %), HPMC E 3LV at (5%) and the hydrophobic polymer concentration Eudragit L100 at lower level (5%) showed 99% drug release profile within 24h was observed.
It was observed that among the different combination of polymers used in different formulations, formulation F9 has shown higher drug release rates (99%) at the end of 24hours so it was the optimized formulation and the drug release rates of optimized formulation F9 were superior to the release rates of innovator.
FIGURE 1: COMPARATIVE IN VITRO PROFILES OF F1-F9 FORMULATIONS
TABLE 4: CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE DRUG RELEASE OF FORMULATION F1-F9 AND INNOVATOR MIRAPEX ER
Time (hrs) | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 | F9 | Innovator
Mirapex ER |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 22.5 | 19.8 | 10.8 | 7.9 | 14.9 | 19.3 | 10.9 | 13 | 15.2 | 21.2 |
2 | 35.4 | 30.7 | 17.0 | 12.8 | 20.6 | 29.5 | 17.7 | 20.9 | 23.6 | 28.4 |
4 | 50.8 | 49.0 | 26.7 | 20.6 | 22.5 | 47.8 | 27.6 | 32.1 | 37.2 | 37.8 |
6 | 58.9 | 56.0 | 34.7 | 27.1 | 27.1 | 59.2 | 36.7 | 41.2 | 47.3 | 46.7 |
9 | 68.8 | 67.9 | 44.9 | 35.6 | 35.6 | 70.2 | 47.4 | 53.0 | 54.0 | 50.6 |
12 | 76.2 | 78.0 | 52.9 | 49.9 | 42.3 | 77.2 | 57.1 | 61.6 | 66.0 | 59.0 |
16 | 79.5 | 80.1 | 62.1 | 55.9 | 53.8 | 82.5 | 69.8 | 71.5 | 74.0 | 72.5 |
20 | 82.5 | 83.5 | 69.3 | 60.2 | 58.8 | 85.3 | 74.6 | 78.6 | 86.0 | 80.7 |
24 | 87.6 | 88.0 | 75.3 | 67.1 | 67.1 | 87.5 | 81.7 | 81.7 | 99.0 | 94.5 |
FIGURE 2: COMPARISON PROFILE OF DRUG RELEASE OF FORMULATION F9 AND INNOVATOR MIRAPEX ER
Drug Release Kinetics: The different models, viz. Zero order, first order, Higuchi’s equation and Korsemeyer-Peppa’s equation were used to study the in-vitro release of extended release tablets.
The zero order plots of formulations were found to be fairly linear as indicated by their regression values. Therefore, it was ascertained that the drug release from tablets followed first order kinetics, to confirm the mechanism of drug release from polymers; the data’s were computed and graphed according to Higuchi’s equation and Korsemeyer- Peppa’s equation.
First order R2 value (Table 5) for the best formulation (F9) was found to be 0.970. Korsemeyer-Peppa’s (Figure 3A-E) R2 value was found to be 0.993 and ‘n’ value found to be 0.570 respectively.
By the results, it was confirmed that order of drug release follows first order and the mechanism of drug release from extended release tablets was by Non-Fickian diffusion.
TABLE 5: KINETIC PARAMETERS OF PRAMIPEXOLE DIHYDROCHLORIDE MONOHYDRATE EXTENDED RELEASE MATRIX TABLETS
Formulation code
|
Mathematical model | ||||
Zero order (R2) | First order (R2) | Higuchi model (R2) | Peppa’s model (R2) | ‘n’ value | |
Innovator | 0.780 | 0.984 | 0.501 | 0.982 | 0.459 |
F1 | 0.832 | 0.963 | 0.944 | 0.961 | 0.411 |
F2 | 0.834 | 0.961 | 0.957 | 0.945 | 0.487 |
F3 | 0.961 | 0.999 | 0.998 | 0.992 | 0.067 |
F4 | 0.957 | 0.985 | 0.993 | 0.989 | 0.069 |
F5 | 0.991 | 0.991 | 0.973 | 0.947 | 0.478 |
F6 | 0.818 | 0.955 | 0.934 | 0.959 | 0.481 |
F7 | 0.960 | 0.997 | 0.996 | 0.997 | 0.642 |
F8 | 0.937 | 0.995 | 0.993 | 0.993 | 0.589 |
F9 | 0.785 | 0.970 | 0.994 | 0.993 | 0.570 |
A: ZERO ORDER
B: FIRST-ORDER
C: HIGUCHI MODEL
D: F9 KORSEMEYER- PEPPA’S MODEL
E: HIXON- CROWEL CUBE ROOT LAW
FIGURE 3: KINETIC PARAMETERS OF OPTIMIZED (F9) PRAMIPEXOLE DIHYDROCHLORIDE MONO-HYDRATE EXTENDED RELEASE MATRIX TABLETS
Drug excipient compatibility studies:
FT-IR studies: The major peaks obtained in the FTIR studies of pure drug Pramipexole dihydrochloride monohydrate like benzothiazole, C=C, N-H and aromatic C-H stretching’s remained unchanged when mixed with the polymers and in the formulation (spectra 1 & 2). So it was observed that there is no physical incompatibility between the drug and excipients.
SPECTRA 1: PURE DRUG OF PRAMIPEXOLE DIHYDROCHLORIDE MONOHYDRATE
SPECTRA 2: PRAMIPEXOLE DIHYDROCHLORIDE MONOHYDRATE WITH PHYSICAL MIXTURE
Stability Studies for (F9) optimized formulation: F9 formulation was selected for stability studies on the basis of high cumulative percentage drug release. Stability studies were conducted for 3 months under different conditions like 25oC ± 2oC / 60% RH ± 5% RH, 300c ± 20oC/ 65% RH ± 5% RH and 40oC ± 2oC/75%± 5% RH according to ICH guidelines. From these results, it was concluded that, formulation F9 is stable and retained their original properties with minor differences and proved to be stable throughout the period of storage.
TABLE 6: DISSOLUTION PROFILE OF STABILITY BATCH OF OPTIMIZED FORMULATION F9
Time (h) | F9 | 1st month | 2nd month | 3rd month |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 15.2 | 15.1 | 15.0 | 14.8 |
2 | 23.6 | 23.4 | 23.2 | 23.0 |
4 | 37.2 | 37.1 | 37.0 | 36.9 |
6 | 47.3 | 47.1 | 46.9 | 46.2 |
9 | 54.0 | 53.9 | 53.4 | 53.0 |
12 | 66.0 | 65.9 | 65.2 | 65.0 |
16 | 74.0 | 73.8 | 73.6 | 73.6 |
20 | 86.0 | 85.6 | 85.4 | 85.2 |
24 | 99.0 | 98.9 | 98.5 | 98.5 |
How to cite this article:
Sudhamani T, Dande JK and Rajarajan S: Formulation and in-vitro optimization of extended release tablets of Pramipexole dihydrochloride monohydrate for Parkinson’s disease. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2014; 5(3): 874-81.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.5(3).874-81 |
CONCLUSION: The hydrophilic matrix of HPMC alone could not control the Pramipexole dihydrochloride monohydrate release effectively for 24 hours. Based on the physicochemical characteristics and in-vitro release studies, F9 formulation was found to be optimized. The optimized formula of F9 matrix tablet prepared with hydrophilic polymer HPMC K200M (41.7%), HPMC E 3LV (5%) in combination with hydrophobic polymer Eudragit L100 (5 %) with PVP K90 as granulating agent was found to be a better system for once daily extended release of Pramipexole dihydrochloride monohydrate as 99% of drug release for 24hrs, when compared to innovator Mirapex ER (94.5%). Finally, it was concluded that it can be used for the relief of Parkinson’s disease which improve patient compliance and a potential for better symptomatic control, particularly in patients with early disease that can be managed with once daily dose.
REFERENCES:
- Eva –Maria Hametner, Klaus Seppi, Werner Poewe. Role And Clinical Utility Of Pramipexole Extended Release In The Treatment Of Early Parkinsonism Disease.2012’ 7: 83-88.
- Fatai kunle Salawu. Patient considerations in early management of Parkinson’s disease: focus on extended-release pramipexole. 2012,6:49-54.
- Olanow CW, Koller WC. An algorithm for the management of Parkinson’s disease. 1998; 50 (3): 51-57.
- Ishibashi K, Ishii K, Oda K, Mizusawa H, Ishiwata K bindingof Pramipexole to Extrastriatal Dopamine D2/D3 Receptors in the Human Brain: A Positron Study Using C11-FLB 457. 2011; 6(3).
- Bennett JP, Piercey MF. Pramipexole a new dopamine agonist for the treatment of parkinson’s disease. 1999, 163: 25-31.
- Liberman A, Raubosky A, Korts D. Clinical evaluation of pramipexole in advanced parkinson’s disease: results of a doble blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study. 1997, 49: 162-168.
- Shannon KM, Bennett JP, Friedman JH. Efficincy of pramipexole, a novel dopamine agonist, as monotherapy in mild to moderate parkinson’s disease, The Pramipexole Study Group. 1997,49:724-728.
- Dangi Amish. A, Manish Kumar Rai, Shukla Tapan M. Formulation and optimization of extended release metformin tablet: effects of polymers and additives on drug release mechanism. 2011, 1(2).
- Nagaswamy Venkatesh D, Jawahar N, Senthil V. Development and in vitro evaluation of sustained release matrix tablets of theophylline using hydrophilic polymer as release retardant. 2009, 2(1).
- Satyanarayana T, Suresh kumar P, Mohideen S. Formulation and evaluation of alfuzosin hydrochloride extended release tablets. 2011, 3: 923-934.
- Cooper J, Gunn C., 1986. Powder flow and compaction. In: Carter SJ, eds. Tutorial Pharmacy. New Delhi, India: CBSPublishers and Distributors; 211-233.
- Lordi GN.,1987. Sustained release dosage forms. In: L Lachman, HA Liberman, JL Kanig, eds. The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy. Mumbai, India: Varghese Publishing House, 430-456.
- Shah D Shah Y; Rampradhan M. Formulation and evaluation of nefidipine extended release tablets. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 1997; 23(6): 567-574.
- Aulton ME, Wells TI. Pharmaceutics: The Science of Dosage Form Design. London, England: ChurchillLivingstone; 1988.
- Brahmankar DM, and Jaiswal SB., 2009. Biopharmaceutics and pharmacokinetics A Treatise; 2nd; 240-243.
- Shah M.V, De Gennaro M, Suryakarma H. J; Microencapsul. 1987, 4, 223-238.
- Higuchi T. Mechanism of sustained action, medication; thearatical analysis of rate of solid drug dispersed in solid matrix, J Pharm Sci. 1961, 50, 874-875.
- Hixson A.W, Crowell J.H. Ind Eng Chem, 1931, 23, 923-931.
- Korsmeyer R.W, Gurny R, Doelker E, Buri P, Peppas. N.A Mechanism of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers Int J Pharm, 1983, 15, 25-35.
- Siepmann, J; Peppas, N.A. Modelling of drug release from delivery systems based on hydroxyl propyl methyl cellulose (HPMC). Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2001, 48, 139-157.
- Tiwari S.B, Murthy T. K, Pai P. R, Mehta R. M and Chowdary P. B. Controlled release formulation of tramadol hydrochloride using hydrophilic and hydrophobic matrix systems. AAPS Pharmaceutical sciences technology 2003; 4(3): 18-23.
How to cite this article:
Sudhamani T, Dande JK and Rajarajan S: Formulation and in-vitro optimization of extended release tablets of Pramipexole dihydrochloride monohydrate for Parkinson’s disease. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2014; 5(3): 874-81.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.5(3).874-81
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
23
874-881
595KB
1707
English
IJPSR
T. Sudhamani*, Jeevan Kumar Dande and S. Rajarajan
Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmaceutics, The Erode College of Pharmacy and Research, Vepampalayam, Vallipurathanpalyam (po), Erode - 638 112, Tamil Nadu, India
tsmkrishv28@yahoo.com
10 October, 2013
28 November, 2013
10 February, 2014
http://dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.5(3).874-81
01March2014