FORMULATION DESIGN AND IN-VITRO EVALUATION OF ZOLMITRIPTAN GASTRORETENSIVE FLOATING MATRIX TABLETS FOR MANAGEMENT OF MIGRAINE
HTML Full TextFORMULATION DESIGN AND IN-VITRO EVALUATION OF ZOLMITRIPTAN GASTRORETENSIVE FLOATING MATRIX TABLETS FOR MANAGEMENT OF MIGRAINE
Rana Zafar 1 and Niranjan Panda *2
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, JNTUA, Anantapur Andhra Pradesh, India
PG Department of Pharmaceutics, Anwarul Uloom College of Pharmacy, Newmallepally, Hyderabad-500001, Telengana, India.
ABSTRACT: Objective: The objective of the present investigation was to formulate and evaluate hydrodynamically balanced floating matrix controlled drug delivery system of Zolmitriptan by increasing its residence time and improves the bioavailability. Methods: Twelve different formulations of floating tablets were prepared using direct compression technique with hydrophilic polymers such as HPMC K4M, K15M, K100M and hydrophobic polymer like ethyl cellulose in different ratios. Dry powder blends of all the formulations were evaluated for precompression parameters and all the formulations were evaluated for post compression parameters after compression into tablet. Characterization of the prepared formulation was done by FTIR and DSC analysis. In-vitro dissolution studies were carried out for all the formulations and optimised formulation was analysed for kinetic as well as mechanism of drug release. Accelerated stability studies were carried out for the optimised formulation at stressed temperatures/humidity conditions i.e 40 ± 2 °C/70 ± 5% RH. Results: The evaluation results of precompression and postcompression parameters revealed that all formulations comply with the specification of official pharmacopoeias. From DSC and FTIR studies revelled that there were no interaction between the drug and polymers and formulations were thermally stable. Out of all the formulation developed, formulation F11 containing 25% of HPMC K100M and 12.5% of ethyl cellulose showed optimum in vitro drug release upto 99% at the end of 12 h. The formulations that contain more than 12.5% of NaHCO3 had floating time more than 12h. Kinetic of in vitro drug release of optimized formulation F11 found to be zero order having drug release mechanism as anomalous diffusion coupled with erosion. Accelerated stability studies of optimised formulation F11 showed a little change in physicochemical properties as well as drug release profiles at the end of 90 days indicating all the formulations were stable. Conclusion: From the above experimental results it was ensured that Zolmitriptan sustained release floating matrix tablet was a successful formulation with several advantages.
Keywords: |
Gastroretensive drug delivery, floating drug delivery, Zolmitriptan, Sustained release, Migraine
INTRODUCTION: Gastroretensive drug delivery systems were designed to prolong the residence time of drug in the GIT. Gastric retention can be prolonged by using floating, mucoadhesive, swelling and high density systems.
These systems release the drug in gastric fluid for prolong period before it reaches its site of absorption and thereby ensures optimal bioavailability of drugs having stability and more solubility in gastric fluids 1. Various approaches have been pursued over the last three decades, to increase the retention of oral dosage forms in the stomach.
The most common approaches used to increase the gastric residence time of pharmaceutical dosage forms include a) co-administration of the DDS with pharmacological agents that slow gastric motility, b) bioadhesive systems, c) size increasing systems, which are either due to expansion and shape modification and d) density controlled systems which are either, high density systems or floating systems. Among the above methods used for gastric retention floating systems are most commonly used now-a-days. Floating systems are less dense than that of gastric fluid and so remain buoyant in stomach for extended period of time. While the system is floating over the gastric contents, the drug is slowly released at the desired rate.
This results in an increase in the gastro retention time and decrease in fluctuation in plasma drug concentration. Based on the mechanism of buoyancy, two distinctly different technologies have been utilized in development of FDDS which are: A. Effervescent System, and B. Non- Effervescent System. Effervescent systems include use of gas generating agents, carbonates (ex. Sodium bicarbonate) and other organic acid (e.g. citric acid and tartaric acid) present in the formulation to produce carbon dioxide (CO2) gas, thus reducing the density of the system and making it float on the gastric fluid. The Non-effervescent FDDS based on mechanism of swelling of polymer or bioadhesion to mucosal layer in GI tract.
The most commonly used excipients in non-effervescent FDDS are gel forming or highly swellable cellulose type hydrocolloids, polysaccharides and matrix forming material such as polycarbonate, polyacrylate, polymethacrylate, polystyrene as well as bioadhesive polymer such as chitosan and carbopol. Floating matrix tablets are type of sustained release drug delivery system which floats on gastric fluids for longer period of time by generating co2 gas or by swelling and release the drug for prolonged period of time. Prolonging of drug release can be achieved by use of various polymers like various grade of HPMC, Eudragit, chitosan, carbopol, guar gum and xanthum gum2.
Migraine headache are the most common disease described as vascular headache that causes a throbbing and pulsating pain around the head. It involves abnormal sensitivity of arteries within the brain resulting in triggers that often lead to rapid changes in the diameter of artery, resulting from spasm. As a result of this other arteries in the brain and scalp dilate resulting in terrible pain in the head. Zolmitriptan is a selective serotonin receptor agonist used in the acute treatment of migraine. Zolmitriptan binds with high affinity to human 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors leading to cranial blood vessel constriction. It is having oral bioavailability 40% and plasma half-life 3 hours. Zolmitriptan is a white to almost white powder slightly soluble in water (1.3 mg/ml at 250°C) but shows greater solubility in 0.1M hydrochloric acid belonging to class III of BCS classification. The recommended starting dose is 1.25 or 2.5 mg. The maximum recommended single dose is 5mg 3 to 4 times in a day3.
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Materials:
Zolmitriptan was a gift sample from Dr Reddy’s laboratories Ltd, Hyderabad. HPMC K4M, HPMC K15M, HPMC K100M, and ethyl cellulose polymers were received as gift sample from Glenmark Pharma, Nasik, India. Talc and magnesium Stearate from S.D. fine chemicals Pvt. Ltd’ Mumbai, India. Microcrystal line cellulose was procured from Signet Chemicals. All other ingredients used were of analytical grade and purchased from SD fine chemicals Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, India.
Methods:
Formulation of Zolmitriptan floating matrix tablets:
Zolmitriptan floating matrix tablets were formulated by direct compression method. All the powders passed through 40 mesh sieve. The required quantity of Zolmitriptan, various polymers and fillers were mixed thoroughly. Magnesium stearate and talc were finally added as a lubricant and glidant respectively. The dry blends were tested for various precompression parameters like bulk density, tapped density, angle of repose, Carr’s index, Hausner’s ratio etc.
The evaluated mixture of powder was directly compressed (8 mm diameter, circular flat faced punches) on a 10 station rotary tablet punching machine (SHAIMAC Technology Pvt. Ltd, Hyderabad, India). Each tablet contained 10 mg of Zolmitriptan. All the tablets were stored in airtight containers for further study 4, 5. The compositions of different excipients used for the formulation of Zolmitriptan floating matrix tablet were shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1: DIFFERENT FORMULATIONS OF ZOLMITRIPTAN FLOATING MATRIX TABLETS
Formulations (mg) | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 | F9 | F10 | F11 | F12 |
Zolmitriptan | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
HPMC K4M | 40 | - | - | 45 | - | - | 50 | - | - | - | - | - |
HPMC K15M | - | 40 | - | - | 45 | - | - | 50 | - | - | - | - |
HPMC K100M | - | - | 40 | - | - | 45 | - | - | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Ethyl cellulose | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 |
NaHCO3 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
MCC | 97 | 97 | 97 | 87 | 87 | 87 | 77 | 77 | 77 | 72 | 67 | 62 |
PVP K30 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
Mg. Stearate | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Talc | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Total weight | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 |
Analytical Method for the in-vitro Estimation of Zolmitriptan in the formulations:
Scanning: From the stock solution, a suitable concentration (10µg/ml) was prepared with pH 1.2 Hydrochloric acid buffer solutions and UV scan was taken between 200-400 nm. The absorption maxima of 283 nm was selected and utilized for further studies.
Standard Plot: From the stock solution, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 µg/ml solutions of Zolmitriptan were prepared in pH 1.2 hydrochloric acid buffer solutions. The absorbance was measured at 283 nm and a graph of concentration versus absorbance was plotted. Standard plot data of Zolmitriptan in pH 1.2 hydrochloric acid buffer solutions is reported 6.
Evaluation of pre-compression parameters of dry powder blend of all formulations:
Angle of Repose (θ):
This is the maximum angle possible between the surface of a pile of powder and the horizontal plane. The powders were allowed to flow through the funnel fixed to a stand at definite height (h). The angle of repose was then calculated by measuring the height and radius of the heap of granules formed.
tan θ =h/r
θ = tan-1(h/r)
Where, θ = angle of repose
h = height of the heap
r = radius of the heap
According to the specifications the angle of repose value less than 250 indicates excellent flow whereas angle between250-300 indicates good flow. The angle between 300-400 indicates passable flow and angle greater than 400 indicates very poor flow7,8.
Bulk density:
Both the loose bulk density (LBD) and tapped bulk density (TBD) were determined. The quantity of 2 gm of powder from each formula, previously lightly shaken to break any agglomerates formed; was introduced into a 10 ml measuring cylinder. After the initial volume was observed, the cylinder was allowed to fall under its own weight on to a hard surface form the height of 2.5 cm at second interval. The tapping was continued until no further change in volume was noted. LBD and TBD were calculated using the following formulas.
LBD =
TBD =
Compressibility Index (Carr’s index):
The flow ability of powder can be evaluated by comparing the loose bulk density (LBD) and tapped bulk density (TBD) of powder and the rate at which it packed down.
Compressibility index (Carr’s index) is calculated by following formula
Carr’s index (%) = × 100
According to the specification the Carr’s index values between 5-15 indicates excellent flow where as between 12-16 indicates good flow. Values between18-21 indicate fare-passable where as between 23-25 indicates poor. Between 33-38 indicates very poor and greater than 40 indicates extremely poor 7, 8.
Hausner’s ratio =
According to specifications values less than 1.25 indicate good flow (=20% of Carr’s index), where as greater than 1.25 indicates poor flow (=33% of Carr’s index). Between 1.25 and 1.5, added glidant normally improves flow 7, 8.
Content uniformity:
The 200 mg of dry powder blends containing equivalent quantity of 10mg of Zolmitriptan was dissolved in 100ml of PH 1.2 HCl buffer and heated at 37 0C for 15-20 minutes with stirring. The cooled solution was passed through a Whatmann (no. 1) filter paper and analyzed spectrophotometrically at 283 nm after sufficient dilution with PH 1.2 HCl buffer 6.
Evaluation of Zolmitriptan floating matrix tablets:
Thickness:
From each batch ten Zolmitriptan floating tablets were randomly selected and used for thickness determination. Thickness of each tablet was measured by using digital Vernier Caliper (Mitutoyo dial Thickness Gauge, Mitutoyo, Japan) and the results were expressed as mean values of ten readings, with standard deviations10.
Tablet Hardness:
The Zolmitriptan floating tablets hardness was measured by using Monsanto hardness tester. From each batch the crushing strength of ten floating tablets with known weights were recorded in kg/cm2 and average was calculated and presented with standard deviation11.
Friability:
Previously weighed 10 tablets from each batch were taken in Roche friabilator (Roche friabilator, Pharma labs, Ahmedabad, India). After100 revolutions of friabilator tablets were recovered. The tablets were then made free from dust and the total remaining weight was recorded. Friability was calculated from the following formula12.
Percentage friability = (Initial weight – Final weight)/ Initial weight × 100
Weight variation test:
All formulated Zolmitriptan floating tablets were evaluated for weight variation as per USP monograph. Twenty tablets were weighed collectively and individually using an electronic balance. The average weight was calculated and percent variation of each tablet was calculated16.
Content uniformity:
Twenty tablets were taken and powdered; powder equivalent to one tablet was taken and dissolved in 100 ml of PH 1.2 HCl buffer. The solution was filtered, suitably diluted and the Zolmitriptan content was measured by using UV Spectrophotometer (Elico, India) at 283 nm. Each measurement was carried out in triplicate and the average drug content in the floating tablet was calculated 17, 18.
In Vitro Buoyancy Test:
The prepared floating tablets were subjected to in vitro buoyancy test by placing them in 250 ml beaker containing 200ml PH 1.2 HCl buffer (temp. 37±0.50C). The time required for the tablet to rise to the surface for floating was determined as the floating lag time and floating duration of all tablets was determined by visual observation10, 11.
In -Vitro Drug Release:
In vitro drug release studies were carried out using USP XXII dissolution apparatus type II (Lab India DS 8000, Mumbai, India) at 37 ± 0.5ºC. The studies were performed with rotation speed of 50 rpm using 900ml dissolution medium of PH 1.2 HCl buffer. 5ml of the samples were withdrawn at one hour intervals and replaced with an equal volume of buffer. The Zolmitriptan release at different time intervals was measured using an ultraviolet visible spectrophotometer (Analytical Technology Ltd, Spectro 2080) at 283 nm after suitable dilution. The study was performed in triplicate 25, 26.
Swelling index study:
The extent of swelling was measured in terms of percentage weight gain by the tablet. The swelling index of all formulation was studied. One tablet from each batch was kept in a Petridis containing PH 1.2 HCl buffer. The tablet was removed every two hour interval up to 12 hour and excess water blotted carefully using filter paper. The swollen tablets were re-weighed (Wt). The swelling index (SI) of each tablet was calculated according to the following equation10, 11.
S.I. = {(Wt-W0) / W0} ×100
Where W0 = initial weight, Wt = final weight
Characterization of the drug release profile:
The rate and mechanism of release of Zolmitriptan from prepared floating matrix tablets were analyzed by fitting the dissolution data into following exponential equations21.
Zero order release equation:
Q = K0t
Where Q is the amount of drug released at time t and K0 is the zero order release rate constant.
The first order equation:
ln (100 – Q) = ln 100 – K1t
Where, K1 is the first order release rate constant.
The dissolution data was fitted to the Higuchi’s equation:
Q = K2 t1/2
Where, K2 is the diffusion rate constant.
The dissolution data was also fitted to the Korsmeyer-Peppas equation, which is often used to describe the drug release behaviour from polymeric systems:
Log (Mt/M∞) = log K + n log t
Where Mt is the amount of drug released at time t, M∞ is the amount of drug release after infinite time, K is a release rate constant and n is the diffusion exponent indicative of the mechanism of drug release.
For matrix tablets, if the exponent n < 0.5, then the drug release mechanism is quasi-fickian diffusion (If n = 0.5 then fickian diffusion and if the value is 0.5 < n < 1, then it is anomalous diffusion coupled with erosion. An exponent value of 1 is indicative of Case-II Transport or typical zero-order and n > 1 non-fickian super Case II). The diffusion exponent was based on Korsmeyer-Peppas equation21, 22.
Drug excipients compatibility studies:
FTIR study:
Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) study was performed to verify any physical or chemical interaction between the pure drug and the polymers. The FTIR studies of pure drug Zolmitriptan, HPMC K100M, ethyl cellulose and optimised formulation (F11) were carried out. It was performed by potassium bromide (KBr) pellet method. The pure drug was triturated with KBr and pellet was prepared by setting the pressure to 100 kg/cm2 for 2 min. The obtained pellet was analyzed in FTIR 8400S, Shimadzu, Japan. KBr background was obtained initially before analysis of test samples. The same procedure was repeated for the analysis of drug and individual excipients20.
DSC Studies:
The DSC analysis of Zolmitriptan, HPMC K100M, ethyl cellulose, optimised formulation (F11) were carried out using a Shimadzu DSC 60, (Japan) to evaluate any possible polymer drug thermal interaction. Exactly weighed 5 to 6 mg samples were hermetically sealed in aluminium crucible and heated at constant rate of 10o C/min over a temperature range of 40 to 300oC. Inert atmosphere was maintained by purging nitrogen gas at a flow rate of 50 ml/min 22.
Stability studies:
The stability studies of optimised formulation (F11) were carried out according to ICH guidelines. The optimized formulation was subjected to stability study at 40 oC ± 2 oC/ 75% ± 5% RH for 90 days. After that period the product was evaluated for friability, hardness, weight variation, thickness, drug content and in vitro release study24.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
The loose bulk densities of dry powder blends of all formulations were found to be in the range of 0.209 to 0.292 g/cm3 and the tapped densities were found to be in between 0.291 to 0.390 g/cm3. This indicates good packing capacity of granules. Bulk density and tapped density measurements found that density of a powder depends on particle packing and that density changes as the powder consolidates. Values of Carr’s index below 15% usually show good flow characteristics, but readings above 25% indicate poor flowability. Carr’s index was found to be between 13.79 to 31.69 that indicate good to average flow properties.
Formulations F4, F1 and F2 having more 25% Carr’s index which indicates pore flow properties and presences of more fine particles. Hausner’s ratio is simple method to evaluate stability of powder column and to estimate flow properties. Low range was observed of Hausner’s ratio that indicates good flow ability. In all formulations the Hausner’s ratios were found to be between 1.16 to 1.46 that indicates good flow and the formulation having more than 1.25 requires adding glidant to improve flow properties. Angle of repose is suited for particle > 150μm.Values of angle of repose ≤ 30 generally indicates the free flowing material and angle of ≥ 40 suggest a poor flowing material. The angle of repose is indicative of the flowability of the material.
The angle of repose of all formulations fell within the range of 20.97 to 24.27 i.e. dry powder blends was of good flow properties. The results of precompression parameters of each formulation were given in Table 2.
TABLE 2: EVALUATION PARAMETERS OF DRY BLENDS OF ZOLMITRIPTAN FLOATING MATRIX TABLET POWDERS FORMULATIONS F1- F12
F. No. | Bulk density(gm/cc) | Tapped density(gm/cc) | Angle of repose | Carr’s index | Hausner’sratio | DrugContent (%) |
F1 | 0.232±0.04 | 0.323±0.06 | 24.19±0.14 | 28.17 | 1.39 | 98.39±0.10 |
F2 | 0.291±0.05 | 0.390±0.08 | 23.38±0.08 | 25.38 | 1.34 | 99.73±0.09 |
F3 | 0.264±0.02 | 0.328±0.14 | 21.91±0.04 | 19.51 | 1.24 | 99.48±0.08 |
F4 | 0.209±0.06 | 0.306±0.07 | 24.27±0.12 | 31.69 | 1.46 | 98.92±0.11 |
F5 | 0.218±0.07 | 0.291±0.09 | 22.53±0.10 | 25.09 | 1.33 | 99.26±0.12 |
F6 | 0.242±0.06 | 0.299±0.10 | 24.72±0.06 | 19.06 | 1.23 | 99.42±0.08 |
F7 | 0.256±0.04 | 0.316±0.05 | 23.44±0.13 | 18.98 | 1.23 | 99.26±0.06 |
F8 | 0.248±0.08 | 0.321±0.08 | 22.73±0.15 | 22.74 | 1.29 | 98.40±0.14 |
F9 | 0.275±0.10 | 0.319±0.07 | 21.62±0.10 | 13.79 | 1.16 | 101.60±0.10 |
F10 | 0.289±0.08 | 0.341±0.11 | 20.76±0.11 | 15.25 | 1.18 | 102.62±0.12 |
F11 | 0.284±0.11 | 0.334±0.06 | 20.97±0.08 | 21.33 | 1.17 | 99.43±0.13 |
F12 | 0.269±0.05 | 0.322±0.09 | 21.84±0.10 | 16.46 | 1.20 | 99.27±0.06 |
All values are expressed as average± SD; (n=3)
The physical parameters of the all the formulations of Zolmitriptan floating matrix tablets were found to be satisfactory. Typical tablet defects, such as capping, chipping and picking, were not observed. The physicochemical characterizations of different batches of Zolmitriptan floating tablets are given in Table 3.
TABLE 3: EVALUATION OF POST-COMPRESSION PARAMETERS OF ZOLMITRIPTAN FLOATING MATRIX TABLETS FORMULATION F1- F12
F. No. | Averagehardness
(kg/cm2) |
AverageWeight
Variation (mg) |
Averagefriability
(% w/w) |
Averagethickness
(mm) |
Content uniformity(%) | Floating lag time (sec) | Floating durations (Hour) |
F1 | 4.84±0.6 | 201±1.81 | 0.49±0.02 | 3.21±0.12 | 99.54±1.8 | 46±0.9 | 08±0.2 |
F2 | 4.52±0.2 | 203±1.12 | 0.51±0.04 | 3.28±0.09 | 100.28±1.7 | 38±0.8 | 09±0.4 |
F3 | 4.79±0.4 | 202±2.24 | 0.52±0.03 | 3.27±0.08 | 101.83±1.6 | 39±0.7 | 08±0.5 |
F4 | 4.15±0.6 | 201±2.20 | 0.65±0.02 | 3.22±0.10 | 98.19±1.8 | 27±0.6 | 10±0.4 |
F5 | 4.22±0.5 | 199±1.81 | 0.61±0.05 | 3.24±0.08 | 99.27±1.5 | 28±0.8 | 11±0.5 |
F6 | 4.21±0.1 | 202±1.31 | 0.58±0.06 | 3.22±0.07 | 98.39±1.6 | 25±0.9 | 10±0.6 |
F7 | 4.02±0.4 | 199±2.12 | 0.73±0.02 | 3.24±0.11 | 99.74±1.8 | 15±1.1 | 14±0.5 |
F8 | 4.05±0.5 | 201±1.61 | 0.72±0.04 | 3.23±0.09 | 101.52±1.7 | 16±0.5 | 15±0.4 |
F9 | 3.98±0.4 | 202±1.53 | 0.75±0.03 | 3.25±0.12 | 99.68±1.4 | 12±0.8 | 13±0.5 |
F10 | 4.07±0.3 | 198±1.42 | 0.78±0.05 | 3.24±0.08 | 98.09±1.7 | 10±0.6 | 14±0.3 |
F11 | 4.68±0.2 | 202±1.30 | 0.79±0.04 | 3.21±0.08 | 99.64±1.2 | 10±0.9 | 15±0.1 |
F12 | 4.11±0.5 | 201±1.63 | 0.72±0.06 | 3.29±0.09 | 98.91±1.4 | 12±0.7 | 14±0.2 |
All values are expressed as average± SD; (n=3)
The thickness of the tablets were ranged between 3.21±0.08 to 3.29±0.09 mm. All the batches showed uniform thickness. Weight variations for different formulations were found to be 198±1.42 to 203±1.12mg. The average percentage deviation of all tablet formulations was found to be within the limit, and hence all formulations passed the test for uniformity of weight as per official requirement. The hardness of all the Zolmitriptan floating matrix tablets formulations were ranged from 4.84±0.6 to 3.98±0.4 kg/cm2. By increasing the concentration of sodium bicarbonate the hardness usually decreased that noticed in case of formulation F10, F11 and F12. The percentage friability of all the formulations were ranged from 0.49±0.02% to 0.79±0.04% and also the % friability were found more by increased concentration of sodium bicarbonate.
In the present study, the percentage friability for all for formulations was within the prescribed limits. The percentages of drug content for F1 to F12 were found to be in between 98.09±1.7 to 101.83±1.6 of Zolmitriptan floating matrix tablet formulations which were within the acceptable limits. The results of post compression parameters of each formulation were given in Table 3.
Swelling study was performed on all the formulations (F1 to F12) for 12 hours. The result of swelling index was shown in Fig 1. Formulations that contains HPMC K100M polymer showed higher swelling indices as compared with other formulations containing HPMC K4M and HPMC K15M. The direct relationship was observed between swelling index and polymer concentration and type, and as polymer concentration increases in floating matrix tablets, swelling index was found to increase but swelling index were found to be decreased by increasing the concentration of ethyl cellulose. The swelling indexes of all the formulations were plotted with respect to time (hour) in the form of histogram and shown in Fig. 1.
FIG.1: SWELLING STUDIES OF ZOLMITRIPTAN FLOATING MATRIX TABLET FORMULATION F1-F1
All the batches of floating tablets were found to exhibit short floating lag times due to presence of gas generating agent, sodium bicarbonate. The buoyancy properties of various Zolmitriptan floating matrix tablets were given in Table 3. The floating lag time of all formulations was less than 60 seconds and the floating lag time decreased due to increased concentration of sodium bicarbonate. Floating durations were varied from 8 hours to more than 12 hours. From formulations F7 to F12 which contained 12.5% of sodium bicarbonate showed an optimum floating duration of more than 12 hours.
In order to optimise the in vitro drug release of Zolmitriptan floating matrix tablets different hydrophilic matrix polymers viz., HPMC K4M, HPMC K15M, HPMC K100M and hydrophobic matrix polymer viz., ethyl cellulose were used and 12 different formulations were prepared. The drug release profiles of different formulations were shown in Fig 2. Between the three grades of HPMC used, HPMC K100M having better controlled release profile than other two grades of HPMC. By increasing the concentration of HPMC the prolong release effect increases and it was found optimum at HPMC polymer concentration of 25%.
It was observed that using HPMC polymer alone causes initial burst release because drug is hydrophilic in nature and maximum release upto 10 hours. So one more hydrophobic polymer i.e ethyl cellulose was added to reduce the initial burst release. F11 formulation that contained 25% of HPMC K100M and 12.5% of ethyl cellulose was considered as optimised formulation as the initial release was 10% and maximum release upto 12 hours.
Further increase in the concentration of ethyl cellulose the initial release rate was much slower which was not desirable. So 12.5% of ethyl cellulose was considered as optimum. The plots of cumulative percentage drug release with respect to time for all the formulations were shown in Fig.2.
FIG.2: IN VITRO STUDIES OF ZOLMITRIPTAN FLOATING MATRIX TABLET FORMULATION F1-F12
The in vitro dissolution data were fitted in different kinetic models viz. zero order, first order, Higuchi and Korse Meyer- Peppas equation and the graphs were plotted Fig.3. The zero-order plots were found to be fairly linear as indicated by their high regression values for F11 formulation. The release exponent ‘n’ for optimised formulation F11 was found to be 0.93 (0.5 < n < 1), which appears to indicate a coupling of the diffusion and erosion mechanism so-called anomalous diffusion. So in present study in vitro drug release kinetic of Zolmitriptan floating matrix tablet followed Release kinetic followed zero order kinetic models and drug release mechanism is anomalous diffusion coupled with erosion. The comparative regression values of all the kinetic profiles were shown in Table 4.
FIG.3: IN VITRO STUDIES OF ZOLMITRIPTAN FLOATING MATRIX TABLET OPTIMISED FORMULATION (F11)
TABLE 4: REGRESSION VALUES OF IN-VITRO RELEASE KINETIC STUDY OPTIMIZED ZOLMITRIPTAN FLOATING MATRIX TABLET (F11)
Formulation | R2value ofZero order | R2 value of1st order | R2value ofHiguchi model | R2value ofPeppa’s model | “n”value of Peppa’s model |
Optimized Zolmitriptan floating matrix Tablet (F11) | 0.997 | 0.911 | 0.982 | 0.996 | 0.933 |
The FTIR spectra of Zolmitriptan exhibits peak due to N-H stretching at 3342.41/cm, C = O stretching at 1730.03/cm, and C = C stretching at 1650.0/cm. These values were meeting the reported values. The FTIR spectra of optimised formulation F11 (Zolmitriptan + Excipients) exhibit peak due to N-H stretching at 3332.76/cm, C=O stretching at 1735.00/cm, and C = C stretching at 1647.10/cm.
Thus it is evident that all the characteristic peaks that were present in the spectra of pure drugs replicated in the same region in the spectra of optimised formulations of Zolmitriptan floating matrix tablet indicating that there is no significant interaction between the drugs and the polymers. The FTIR spectra of drug, polymers and optimised formulations were shown in Fig.4.
DSC study was conducted on the selected formulations. DSC thermogram of pure Zolmitriptan shows sharp endothermic peak at 141.5 °C. Similar endothermic peaks were obtained at 201.1°C for the optimized Zolmitriptan floating matrix tablet formulations prepared with HPMC K100M, and ethyl cellulose.
The endothermic that appears at 76.4 °C for HPMC K100M and at 102 °C for ethyl cellulose also appears the similar peaks at 94.6 °C in optimised formulation F11. Presence of all peaks indicates that all ingredients are compatible with Zolmitriptan potassium and there is no incompatibility between the selected ingredients. DSC thermogram of optimised formulation, drug and polymers are shown in Fig. 5.
FIG.4: FTIR STUDIES OF PURE DRUG, POLYMER AND OPTIMISED FORMULATION (F11)
FIG.5: DSC STUDIES OF PURE DRUG, POLYMER AND OPTIMISED FORMULATION (F11)
The optimised formulation F11 was selected for the accelerated stability studies. The results of in-vitro release profile of optimised formulation at different time interval for accelerated stability conditions were shown in Table 5. The Zolmitriptan floating matrix tablets did not show any significant change in physicochemical parameters and in vitro drug release characteristics. Thus, it was found that the floating tablets of Zolmitriptan (F11) were stable under short term storage conditions for at least 3 months.
TABLE 5: IN-VITRO RELEASE STUDIES OF OPTIMISED FORMULATION (F11) AT ACCELERATED STABILITY CONDITIONS
Time (Hr) | Initial | 15 days | 30 days | 45 days | 60 days | 90 days |
1 | 10.27 | 10.02 | 09.49 | 08.64 | 07.14 | 04.69 |
2 | 18.52 | 18.14 | 17.36 | 16.06 | 14.52 | 12.03 |
3 | 25.39 | 25.06 | 24.15 | 23.34 | 22.46 | 20.14 |
4 | 34.83 | 34.21 | 33.08 | 32.43 | 30.56 | 27.36 |
5 | 45.42 | 45.20 | 44.72 | 43.65 | 41.19 | 38.48 |
6 | 54.84 | 54.25 | 53.31 | 52.26 | 50.72 | 46.82 |
7 | 61.35 | 61.06 | 60.42 | 59.10 | 57.28 | 54.65 |
8 | 70.22 | 69.56 | 68.09 | 66.92 | 64.52 | 62.19 |
9 | 77.44 | 76.82 | 75.19 | 73.45 | 71.83 | 68.61 |
10 | 85.17 | 84.91 | 83.28 | 82.04 | 80.86 | 77.36 |
11 | 92.48 | 92.04 | 91.44 | 90.23 | 88.74 | 85.19 |
12 | 99.87 | 99.17 | 98.23 | 96.46 | 94.63 | 92.38 |
CONCLUSION: In the present work Zolmitriptan floating matrix tablet were successfully developed. The major challenge in this work was to study the effect of various low density polymers on in vitro release rate of floating tablet of Zolmitriptan. The floating drug delivery was a promising approach to achieve a prolongation of gastric residence time of drug. Different types of low density matrix forming polymers HPMC K4M, HPMC K15M, HPMC K100M, and Ethyl cellulose were studied. The main objective of using hydrophobic polymer ethyl cellulose with HPMC was to prevent the burst release effect the hydrophilic drug under study with hydrophilic polymer like HPMC which was successfully developed.
The Sodium bicarbonate was added in varying concentrations as a gas generating agent to improve the floating capacity of tablet. Formulation F11 containing 25% of HPMC K100M and 12.5% of ethyl cellulose showed controlled drug release for 12h (99%) emerging as optimised formulation. By increase in polymer concentration of both the polymer the drug release profile were much slower. Kinetic of in vitro drug release of optimized formulation F11 found to be zero order having drug release mechanism as anomalous diffusion coupled with erosion.
FTIR studies revelled that there is no chemical interaction between drug and polymers. DSC studies proved that no thermal interaction between the drug Zolmitriptan and polymer used in the present studies. The stability studies were carried out according to ICH guideline and selected F11 formulation were stable at 40 oC ± 2 oC/ 75% ± 5% RH up to 3 months . In vitro floating studies were carried out which indicated that gastric residence time could be increased by the floating principle upto 12 hours and was considered desirable for improving bioavailability of the drugs that having more solubility in gastric fluids. Thus from the results of the current study clearly indicate, a promising potential of the Zolmitriptan floating system as an alternative to the conventional dosage form. However, further clinical studies are needed to assess the utility of this system for patients suffering from migraine.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT: The authors are thankful to Dr Reddy’s laboratories Ltd., Hyderabad for providing gift samples. Authors are also thankful to the chairman & principal Anwarul Uloom college of Pharmacy, Hyderabad, Telengana, for permitting to carry out research work.
REFERENCES:
- AV Mayavanshi and SS Gajjar. Floating drug delivery systems to increase gastric retention of drugs: A Review. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2008; 1(4):345-348.
- Arora, J. Ali, A. Ahuja, et al. Floating drug delivery systems: a review. AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech 2005; 6(3): 372-390.
- Triptans for acute cluster headache. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.2013 Jul 17; 7: CD008042.
- He et al., Gastro-floating bilayer tablets for the sustained release of metformin and immediate release of pioglitazone: Preparation and in vitro/in vivo evaluation, Int J of Pharma 476, 2014, 223–231.
- Geeta V Yadav et al Gastroretentive Drug Delivery System Of Lamotrigine: In Vivo Evaluation; Int. J Of Pharm And Pharma Sc. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, 2014, Vol 6, Issue 3, 279-285.
- Pathuri et al, Conceptuation, formulation and evaluation of sustained release floating tablets of captopril compression coated with gastric dispersible hydrochlorothiazide using 23 factorial design; J. of Pharma. Invest. 2014, Vol 4, Issue 2, 77-87.
- Vinay Dhananjay Gaikwad, Vishal Dadasaheb Yadav, Manish Dhananjay Gaikwad, Novel sustained release and swellable gastroretentive dosage form for ciprofloxacin hydrochloride, J. of Pharma. Invest. 2014, Vol 4, Issue 2, 88-92.
- Katyayini and Sellappan Velmurugan; Formulation and Evaluation of Effervescent Floating Tablets of Losartan, Int. J Of Pharm And Pharma Sc. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, 2013, Vol 5, Issue 3, 559-565.
- Sundar et al, Formulation and evaluation of floating matrix tablets of clarithromycin using different grades of HPMC, Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, 2013, Vol 5, Issue 3, 174-176.
- Patel, et al, Formulation and evaluation of mixed matrix gastroretentive drug delivery for famotidine, Int J of Pharma Invest, Vol 1, Issue 4, 2011, 247-254.
- Prajapati, et al, Formulation and evaluation of floating matrix tablet of stavudine, Int J of Pharma Invest, Vol 2, Issue 2, 2012, 83-89.
- Chen, Y.C., Ho, H.O., Lee, T.Y., Sheu, M.T., Physical characterizations and sustained release profiling of gastroretentive drug delivery systems with improved floating and swelling capabilities. Int. J. Pharm. 441, 2013, 162–169.
- P. Vyas, R.K. Khar, gastroretentive system, controlled drug delivery concept and advancement, 2nd edition, 2002; 196-213.
- Yie W. Chien, physiology of GIT, Novel drug delivery systems, 2nd edition, Marcel Dekker, Inc., 2002; 139-196.
- Jain NK. Controlled and Novel Drug Delivery, 1st edn., New Delhi, CBS Publishers, 2004;236-55.
- Yin, L., Qin, C., Chen, K., Zhu, C., Cao, H., Zhou, J., He, W., Zhang, Q.,Gastro-floating tablets of cephalexin: preparation and in vitro/in vivo evaluation. Int. J. Pharm. 452, 2013. 241–248.
- Prajapati BG and Patel KR. Once-Daily Sustained-Release Matrix Tablets of Losartan potassium: Formulation and In Vitro Int J Medical and Clinical Res 2010; 1(1): 1-7.
- Sungthongjeen, S., Sriamornsak, P., Puttipipatkhachorn, S., Design and evaluation of floating multi-layer coated tablets based on gas formation. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 69, 2008, 255–263.
- Velmurugan, B. Deepika, K. Naga Raju “Formulation and in vitro evaluation of buccal tablets of Piroxicam, International Journal of Chem Tech Research 2010; 2(3):1958-1968.
- Higuchi T. Mechanism of sustained action medication. Theoretical analysis of rate release of solid drugs dispersed in solid matrices. J Pharm Sci 1963; 52: 1145-1149.
- Tadros, M.I., Controlled-release effervescent floating matrix tablets of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride: development, optimization and in vitro–in vivo evaluation in healthy human volunteers. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 74, 2010, 332–339.
- Ramesh Bomma, Rongala Appala Awamy Naidu, Madhusudan Rao Yamsani, Kishan Veerabrahma. Development and evaluation of Gastroretentive Norfloxacin floating tablets. Acta Pharm 2009; 59:211–221.
- Naga Raju, S.Velmurugan, B.Deepika, Sundar Vinushitha, Formulation and In-Vitro Evaluation of Buccal Tablets of Metoprolol Tartrate. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2011; 3(2): 239-246.
- N Anjali Devi, Mohd Abdul Hadi, P Rajitha, Jvc Sharma, A Srinivasa Rao, Formulation and Evaluation of Floating Controlled Release Tablets of Imatinib Mesylate Using Hydrophilic Matrix System; Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, 2012, Vol 5, Issue 1, 271-277.
How to cite this article:
Zafar R and Panda N: Formulation Design and In Vitro Evaluation of Zolmitriptan Gastroretensive Floating Matrix Tablets For Management of Migraine. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2015; 6(9): 3901-12.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.6(9).3901-12.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
29
3901-12
727
1630
English
Ijpsr
Rana Zafar and Niranjan Panda *
PG Department of Pharmaceutics, Anwarul Uloom College of Pharmacy, Newmallepally, Hyderabad, Telengana, India.
niranjanpharma82@gmail.com
11 February, 2015
03 April, 2015
05 June, 2015
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.6(9).3901-12
01 September, 2015