HYDROGEL BASED COLON TARGETED DELIVERY OF RABEPRAZOLE SODIUM
HTML Full TextHYDROGEL BASED COLON TARGETED DELIVERY OF RABEPRAZOLE SODIUM
Y. Kumar, B. K. Singh, Aadesh Kumar * and R. S. Padiyar
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumaun University Campus, Bhimtal - 263136, Uttarakhand, India.
ABSTRACT: The aim of this research was to develop controlled and sustained release formulation of hydrogel beads containing rabeprazole sodium, and to study the effects of Eudragit S100 coating on the release of rabeprazole sodium. The main objective was to develop a colon targeted drug delivery system to minimize - drug release in the upper gastro intestinal (GI) tract as well as to minimize GI adverse effects associated with NSAIDs. Alginate hydrogel beads of rabeprazole sodium were formulated by ionotropic gelation technique and the variables studied. The prepared Eudragit S100 coated hydrogel gel beads of rabeprazole sodium were characterized by determining particle size, % drug entrapment efficiency, swelling index and in-vitro release study. The mean particle size was found to be increase with the increment in concentration of sodium alginate and decrease in the concentration of calcium chloride. The % drug entrapment efficiency of the prepared hydrogel beads formulations was found in the range of 67.45 ± 0.23 to 82.89 ± 0.64. Swelling time analysis revealed higher swelling time at pH 1.2 for the coated rabeprazole sodium hydrogel beads than at pH 7.4. With the increase in polymer and CaCl2 concentration the coated hydrogel beads show slow in-vitro drug release rates in dissolution media of different pH particularly in pH 1.2 (0.1N HCl). The results clearly demonstrate that Eudragit S100 coated hydrogel beads of rabeprazole sodium prepared by ionotropic gelation technique could be successfully used as a prospective carrier for sustained drug delivery and preventing GI side effects.
Keywords: |
Rabeprazole sodium, Sodium alginate, Hydrogel beads, Eudragit S100, Colon targeting
INTRODUCTION: Oral drug delivery system is the most desirable, preferable and suitable route for the administration of therapeutic and pharmaceutical agents for administration. Oral sustained release drug delivery systems are formulated to release active ingredient gradually and predictably over a long period and is successful in overcoming the limitations of conventional therapy 1.
The purpose for design sustained and controlled delivery system is to decrease the dosing rate or to increase the drug efficacy by localization at the site of action, dropping the dose necessary, or provide consistent drug delivery 2. It should be able to attain optimal therapeutic drug concentration in the blood with minimum variation, improving therapy, safety, efficacy and patient compliance 3.
Targeting of drugs specifically to the colon is advantageous in the treatment of diseases such as amoebiasis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, and colorectal cancer. In addition, it has shown great potential in the oral delivery of therapeutic peptides and proteins, which are unstable in the upper part of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.
The colonic region is recognized as having less diversity and intensity of enzymatic activities than stomach and small intestine 4. Various strategies are available for targeting drug release selectively to the colon 5. The designing of prodrugs is based on the concept of preventing the release of drugs in the stomach and small intestine and drug release is triggered by the use of specific property at the target site such as altered pH or high activity of certain enzymes in comparison to nontarget tissues 6, 7. Hydrogels have distinctive swelling behaviour, which extensively dictates the pattern of drug delivery. By controlling little crucial aspect such as polymer concentration, composition, initiator and cross-linker nature and concentration, which direct density and degree of cross-linking hydrogel properties, can be ideally modified for their desired application. Chemical and physical connections are vital for the improvement of enviable interfacial strength 8.
Rabeprazole sodium, 2-{[4-(3-methoxypropoxy)-3-methyl-pyridine-2-yl] methyl sulfinyl}-1H-benz-imidazole, belongs to a class of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). It suppress gastric acid secretion by specifically inhibiting the H+/K+-ATPase enzyme system at the secretory surface of the gastric parietal cell 9. Clinically, rabeprazole is used to heal, relieve symptoms and prevent a relapse of acid-peptic diseases, such as duodenal, gastric and oesophageal ulceration 10. Of all PPIs tested, rabeprazole was the most potent acid inhibitor during the first day of dosing 11. Like other PPIs such as omeprazole and lansoprazole, when exposed to acidic or neutral environments, rabeprazole is converted to several components at a faster rate 12. Rabeprazole undergoes pre-systemic and mainly non-enzymatic metabolism that contribute to an absolute bioavailability of about 52% after oral administration of a 20 mg dose 13.
Sodium alginate (SA) is composed of 1,4-linked-b-D-mannuronic acid and a-L-guluronic acid residues, used as a gelling agent in food industry and has a property of undergoing gelation in the presence of cations. In ionic gelation, the exchange of sodium ions occurs with the cations in the external media. SA can also be crosslinked covalently using glutaraldehyde. Such a crosslinked alginate is valuable in the controlled release of drugs 14 - 16. Carrageenans (CG) have high molecular weight, linear heteropolysaccharides extracted from marine algae Rhodophyceae. These consist of sulfate esters of galactose and 3, 6-anhydrogalactose copolymers, linked by alternating a-1,3 and b-1,4 glycosidic linkages 17. Carrageenans have also been used in controlled release technology 18 - 20.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Rabeprazole sodium was obtained from Yarrow Chem. Ltd., Mumbai, India. Sodium alginate, Eudragit S100 and HPMC K4M were also obtained from Yarrow Chem. Ltd. Mumbai, India. Sodium chloride and DMSO were obtained from Loba Chemie, Mumbai, India. All other chemicals such as hydrochloric acid, methanol, ethanol, DMF, di-sodium hydrogen phosphate and potassium di-hydrogen phosphate were obtained from central laboratory of Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumaun University Campus, Bhimtal.
Preparation of Rabeprazole Sodium Hydrogel Beads: The hydrogel beads of Rabeprazole sodium were prepared by ionotropic gelation technique according to the formula given in Table 1. Accurately weighed drug was added to 100ml of distilled water and stirred on magnetic stirrer. HPMC K4M and sodium alginate were then to the solution and stirring continued till uniform polyelectrolyte solution was formed. Calcium chloride was separately dissolved in 100 ml water and stirred on magnetic stirrer.
Poly electrolyte solution of drug and polymer was added drop by drop to the CaCl2 solution with the help of 21 G needle. Stirring at 500 rpm was further continued till a homogenous dispersion was formed. The formed alginate hydrogel beads were cured at different time interval. Going on the ending of this phase the solution of cross linking agent was decant and the alginate beads were wash frequently for three times with 50ml distilled water. The alginate hydrogel beads were dried out at 60°C for 2h in a hot air oven 21.
Coating of Rabeprazole Sodium Hydrogel Beads: Rabeprazole sodium hydrogel beads prepared by ionotropic gelation method were coated by Eudragid S100, (2%) w/v solution of Eudragit S100 was prepared by dissolving 2.0g Eudragit S100 in 100 ml distilled water. The drug loaded alginate wet hydrogel beads were placed in this solution and was kept aside for 30 min on a magnetic stirrer. Coated hydrogel beads were now collected and washed with distilled water and then air dried for whole night 22.
TABLE 1: LIST OF FORMULATIONS OF RABEPRAZOLE SODIUM
Formulation | Drug (mg) | Sodium Alginate | HPMC K4M | Calcium chloride | Eudragit S100 |
F1
F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9 F10 F11 F12 |
20
20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 |
2%
3% 4% 5% 2% 3% 4% 5% 2% 3% 4% 5% |
0.20%
0.20% 0.20% 0.20% 0.20% 0.20% 0.20% 0.20% 0.20% 0.20% 0.20% 0.20% |
3%
3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% 5% 5% 5% 5% |
2%
2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% |
Evaluation Parameters:
Percentage Yield: The % yield of the hydrogel beads was determined from total weight of hydrogel beads obtained and total weight of drug and polymers used.
Percentage Yield = Total weight of beads x 100/ Total weight of drug-polymer
Particle Size Analysis: The particle size distribution analysis was performed by using an optical microscope. A minimum of 15 dried hydrogel beads per batch were counted for the determination of particle size and mean diameter is calculated 23.
Drug Entrapment Efficiency: Entrapment efficiency was calculated to determine the ability of micro hydrogel beads to entrap the drug. About 50 mg of accurately weighed drug loaded hydrogel beads were crushed in a glass mortar and pestle and mixed with 100 ml phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) and kept for 24 hours. The solution was stirred on a magnetic stirrer for 30 min, filtrate was analyzed spectro-photometrically at 283.4 nm. The drug entrapment efficiency was calculated as per the following formula. Drug content was calculated with the help of standard calibration curve of rabeprazole sodium 24.
DEE (%) =Actual drug content x 100 / Theoretical drug content
Swelling Time Study: The swelling properties of the drug loaded micro hydrogel beads (coated) were determined in buffer solution of two different pH ranges (i.e. 1.2 and 7.4 buffer solutions). 20mg
of dried coated and uncoated hydrogel beads were placed in a beaker to which 100 ml of buffer solutions was added and then allowed to swell at 37°C. Coated hydrogel beads were observed visually and the time was recorded with the help of stopwatch at which beads swelling 25.
In-vitro Drug Release Study: The release profiles of rabeprazole sodium from coated hydrogel beads were examined in three different buffer solutions (pH 1.2, 6.8 and 7.4) to mimic the various physiological GI-tracts. The medium of pH 1.2 represented the condition of gastric region pH 6.8 was a compromise condition between pH of the gastric and small intestine and pH 7.4, which is simulated intestinal fluid. The study was carried out in the rotating basket type dissolution apparatus at constant speed (100 rpm) and the temperature of the medium was maintained at 37 ± 0.5 °C for 8 hours. 100 mg of drug loaded coated alginate hydrogel beads were evaluated for drug release. The dissolution studies were carried out in 900 ml of pH 1.2 buffers for two hours. Aliquots of 5 ml every 60 min were withdrawn and immediately replaced the dissolution medium with fresh buffer solution to maintain sink conditions.
After 2 hours the dissolution medium was replaced with fresh phosphate buffer solution of pH 6.8 and dissolution process was continued for 4 hours. After 6 hours from zero the phosphate buffer solution was replaced with fresh phosphate buffer solution of pH 7.4 for 2 hours. Process of sampling was repeated same as above. The samples were taken at the following intervals of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 hours respectively. The samples withdrawn were filtered through a 0.45 μm membrane filter, and then estimated for rabeprazole sodium concentration using UV spectrophotometer 25.
Dissolution Kinetics of Drug Release: In the direction of study the release kinetics, data obtain from in-vitro drug release study were plot in Different kinetic mode. Zero order (cumulative amount of drug release vs. time), First order (log cumulative percentage of drug remaining vs. time), Higuchi’s model (cumulative percentage of drug release vs. square root of time), and Korsmeyer’s (log cumulative percentage of drug release vs. log time).
RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
Percentage Yield: The percentage yield of the coated hydrogel beads was found in the range of 71.78 ± 0.45 % to increase 89.45 ± 0.36 %. (Table 2) The results revealed that the percentage yield of the formulation was found to with the increase in sodium alginate concentration and CaCl2 concentration. It was observed from the results that formulation F11 showed highest 89.45 ± 0.36 % yield. (Fig. 1)
TABLE 2: PERCENTAGE YIELD OF HYDROGEL BEADS
S. no. | Formulation | Percentage Yield (%) |
1 | F1 | 72.12 ± 0.24 % |
2 | F2 | 76.45 ± 0.17% |
3 | F3 | 78.05 ± 0.08 % |
4 | F4 | 82.97 ± 0.14% |
5 | F5 | 71.78 ± 0.45 % |
6 | F6 | 77.46 ± 0.14% |
7 | F7 | 81.60 ± 0.49 % |
8 | F8 | 75.33 ± 0.17% |
9 | F9 | 78.10 ± 0.47% |
10 | F10 | 72.78 ± 0.12% |
11 | F11 | 89.45 ± 0.36% |
12 | F12 | 79.46 ± 0.19% |
Particle Size Analysis: The particle size of prepared rabeprazole sodium coated hydrogel beads as determined by optical microscope (Fig. 2) was found to be in the range of 1.57 ± 0.33 to 2.52 ± 0.12 nm (Table 3).
The result indicates a comparative raise in the mean particle size of hydrogel beads with the raise in the quantity of sodium alginate in the formulations. This could be attributed to an increase in relative viscosity at higher concentration of sodium alginate and formation of large droplets during addition of polymer solution to the gelling agent.
Further, the increase in the concentration of calcium chloride would significantly decrease the mean particle size of beads. It has been stated that when a drop of alginate solution comes in contact with calcium ions, gelation occurs instantaneously. While Ca+2 ions penetrate into inner of droplet, water is squeeze out of the inner from droplet, resulting contraction of beads. The size of the spherical matrix could easily be controlled by varying the stirring speed and cross-linking time of the system.
TABLE 3: PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS
S. no. | Formulation | Average Particle
Size (nm) |
1 | F1 | 1.53 ± 0.04 |
2 | F2 | 1.78 ± 0.14 |
3 | F3 | 2.35 ± 0.11 |
4 | F4 | 2.57 ± 0.13 |
5 | F5 | 1.49 ± 0.47 |
6 | F6 | 1.74 ± 0.05 |
7 | F7 | 2.27 ± 0.26 |
8 | F8 | 2.57 ± 0.07 |
9 | F9 | 1.42 ± 0.32 |
10 | F10 | 1.54 ± 0.09 |
11 | F11 | 1.78 ± 0.03 |
12 | F12 | 2.25 ± 0.05 |
FIG. 1: % YIELD OF HYDROGEL BEADS
FIG. 2: OPTICAL MICROSCOPY OF HYDROGEL BEADS
FIG. 3: % DRUG ENTRAPMENT EFFICIENCY
Drug Entrapment Efficiency: Drug entrapment efficiency of all the formulation was determined and it was found to be in the range of 67.45 ± 0.23 to 82.89 ± 0.64 (Table 4). The % DEE of the hydrogel beads was found to increase with the increase in concentration of sodium alginate and calcium chloride. It was due to formation of more hydrogel beads on increasing sodium alginate concentration thus entrapping the greater amount of the drug. This may be attributed to the greater availability of active calcium binding sites in the polymeric chains and, consequently, the greater degree of cross-linking as the amount of sodium alginate increased. However, on increasing the conc. of CaCl2, hard and complex hydrogel was formed which resulted in more drug entrapment. Formulation F5 (sodium alginate=2%, CaCl2=4%) was found to possess least % DEE i.e. 67.45 ± 0.23 % and maximum % DEE of 82.89 ± 0.64 % was found in formulation F11 (sodium alginate=4%, CaCl2=5%) shown in Fig. 3.
TABLE 4: PERCENTAGE DRUG ENTRAPMENT EFFICIENCY OF HYDROGEL BEADS
Formulation | % Drug Entrapment Efficiency |
F1 | 68.48 ± 0.44 |
F2 | 71.17 ± 0.10 |
F3 | 73.83 ± 0.08 |
F4 | 77.37 ± 0.48 |
F5 | 67.45 ± 0.23 |
F6 | 75.68 ± 0.78 |
F7 | 77.97 ± 0.71 |
F8 | 81.51 ± 0.11 |
F9 | 71.89 ± 0.74 |
F10 | 75.51 ± 0.38 |
F11 | 82.89 ± 0.64 |
F12 | 78.89 ± 0.26 |
Swelling Time Study: Swelling time of the prepared hydrogel beads (coated) was found to be in the range between 04 to 29 minutes at pH 7.4 and 7 to 33 minutes at pH 1.2 respectively (Table
5). The swelling time of coated hydrogel beads at pH 1.2 was found to be higher than at pH 7.4 because Eudragit S100 do not form pores at lower pH. It was also observed that the swelling time of the coated hydrogel beads increased with the increase in concentration of sodium alginate and calcium chloride due to the formation of more hard and rigid hydrogel which had more complexity and less porosity.
TABLE 5: SWELLING TIME STUDY
Formulation | Swelling Time (min) at pH 1.2 | Swelling Time (min) at pH 7.4 |
F1 | 15-17 | 10-12 |
F2 | 23-25 | 18-20 |
F3 | 28-30 | 24-26 |
F4 | 31-33 | 27-29 |
F5 | 13-15 | 09-11 |
F6 | 20-22 | 15-17 |
F7 | 28-30 | 19-21 |
F8 | 18-20 | 14-16 |
F9 | 07-08 | 04-06 |
F10 | 16-19 | 12-13 |
F11 | 22-24 | 14-16 |
F12 | 23-25 | 16-18 |
In-vitro Drug Release Study: Drug release from formulated hydrogel beads was performed in different media, in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) pH 1.2 for initial 2 h, mixed phosphate buffer pH 6.8 for the period up to 6 h and simulated intestinal fluid (SIF) pH 7.2 at end of 8 h studies. Formulation F1 (containing 2 % sodium alginate 0.2 % HPMC K4M, 3% CaCl2) showed the maximum drug release of 89.42 ± 0.13 % in 8 h (Table 6) compared to other formulations whereas minimum drug release was shown by formulation F11 (containing 4% sodium alginate, 0.2% HPMC K4M, 5% of CaCl2) i.e. 62.17±0.35% drug in 8 h (Table 9). The results indicates that when concentration of sodium alginate and calcium chloride was increased the drug release rates from the formulation were decreased and shows more sustained effect. The sustained effect of formulation increased with the increased number of the apparent cross-linking points formed within the calcium-alginate hydrogel beads with increasing alginate concentration. It was also found that with increased concentration of CaCl2, the drug release rate becomes more sustained. When concentration of calcium chloride was increased more Ca+2 ions were present for complex formation and cross linking with alginate, due to which strong, rigid and hard hydrogel beads were formed with less pores, which may reduce the penetration of dissolution medium into core of the matrix, therefore decreasing the release rate.
TABLE 6: % CUMULATIVE DRUG RELEASE FORMULATION F1, F2 AND F3
Time
(h) |
% Cumulative Drug Release ± S.D. | ||
F1 | F2 | F3 | |
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
5.28 ± 0.23
8.96 ± 0.13 21.45 ± 0.14 45.65 ± 0.19 54.45 ± 0.13 76.89 ± 0.23 84.32 ± 0.45 89.42 ± 0.13 |
4.78 ± 0.11
7.82 ± 0.23 16.33 ± 0.37 38.78 ± 0.81 51.12 ± 0.41 62.75 ± 0.14 72.41 ± 0.14 83.43 ± 0.35 |
3.49 ± 0.34
7.13 ± 0.22 16.79 ± 0.29 24.98 ± 0.43 36.71 ± 0.17 47.56 ± 0.46 58.94 ± 0.32 68.47 ± 0.17 |
TABLE 7: % CUMULATIVE DRUG RELEASE FORMULATION F4, F5 AND F6
Time
(h) |
% Cumulative Drug Release ± S.D. | ||
F4 | F5 | F6 | |
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
4.17 ± 0.25
8.13 ± 0.52 17.88 ± 0.17 35.77 ± 0.24 44.83 ± 0.34 56.71 ± 0.14 68.12 ± 0.36 75.96 ± 0.41 |
3.12 ± 0.24
8.69 ± 0.09 17.25 ± 0.04 34.71 ± 0.43 46.79 ± 0.32 58.91 ± 0.32 64.47 ± 0.47 72.78 ± 0.13 |
5.14 ± 0.12
9.45 ± 0.67 16.43 ± 0.43 31.23 ± 0.19 48.47 ± 0.35 59.91 ± 0.22 67.89 ± 0.17 73.81 ± 0.43 |
TABLE 9: % CUMULATIVE DRUG RELEASE FORMULATION F10, F11 AND F12
Time
(hrs) |
% Cumulative Drug Release ± S.D. | ||
F10 | F11 | F12 | |
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
4.19 ± 0.04
7.98 ± 0.19 17.23 ± 0.43 29.46 ± 0.47 39.77 ± 0.19 47.23 ± 0.38 56.49 ± 0.24 67.12 ± 0.15 |
2.18 ± 0.11
8.14 ± 0.34 18.64 ± 0.28 23.18 ± 0.22 36.99 ± 0.14 43.19 ± 0.09 56.13 ± 0.43 62.17 ± 0.35 |
3.78 ± 0.41
9.18 ± 0.12 16.22 ± 0.34 28.35 ± 0.34 39.45 ± 0.22 51.89 ± 0.47 63.78 ± 0.13 71.98 ± 0.18 |
All the formulation were coated with Eudragit S100, the concentration of Eudragit S100 was constant (2%) in all the formulation. In-vitro drug release studies showed that there was not more than 9.45 ± 0.67% drug release in simulated gastric fluid pH 1.2 in any formulation. This indicated the pH dependent dissolution of Eudragit S100, which does not dissolve in acidic pH 1.2. All formulation release more drugs in phosphate buffer pH 6.8.
FIG. 4: CUMULATIVE DRUG RELEASE FORMULATION F1 TO F6
FIG. 5: CUMULATIVE DRUG RELEASE FORMULATION F7 TO F12
Dissolution Kinetics of Drug Release: The drug release data obtained was subjected to Zero order, First order, Higuchi’s and Korsmeyer-peppas in order to establish the drug release mechanisms and kinetics of drug release from the formulation (Table 10). In-vitro drug release data of all formulations was subjected to integrity of well check by linear regression study according to Zero order, First order, Higuchi’s model and Korsmeyer-peppas of kinetic equation and to establish the mechanism of the drug release. Linear regression 0.978 and for first order the plotted r2 values in the range of 0.945 to 0.951 and for Higuchi’s model the plotted r2 values in the range of 0.806 to 0.845 and for Korsmeyer-peppas plot the r2 values in the range of 0.965 to 0.996. These values showed that all the formulations followed the Korsmeyer-peppas kinetics of drug release. From the results of linear regression analysis of all formulations it was indicated that all the formulation were governed by diffusion control process.
TABLE 10: KINETIC RELEASE PROFILE FORMULATIONS
Formulation | Korsmeyer-peppas | Zero order
(r2) |
First order
(r2) |
Higuchi
(r2) |
|
r2 | n | ||||
F1 | 0.968 | 1.513 | 0.967 | 0.945 | 0.832 |
F2 | 0.965 | 1.516 | 0.971 | 0.945 | 0.825 |
F3 | 0.991 | 1.499 | 0.977 | 0.949 | 0.817 |
F4 | 0.982 | 1.498 | 0.980 | 0.962 | 0.837 |
F5 | 0.987 | 1.588 | 0.976 | 0.977 | 0.842 |
F6 | 0.977 | 1.401 | 0.971 | 0.966 | 0.831 |
F7 | 0.972 | 1.476 | 0.979 | 0.952 | 0.826 |
F8 | 0.982 | 1.575 | 0.977 | 0.953 | 0.831 |
F9 | 0.983 | 1.402 | 0.968 | 0.934 | 0.806 |
F10 | 0.987 | 1.404 | 0.985 | 0.966 | 0.845 |
F11 | 0.987 | 1.605 | 0.981 | 0.966 | 0.836 |
F12 | 0.996 | 1.470 | 0.978 | 0.951 | 0.823 |
CONCLUSION: The study has revealed that ionotropic gelation technique can be successfully employed for the preparation of rabeprazole sodium hydrogel beads by utilizing sodium alginate and calcium chloride as drug release modifiers. Eudragit S 100 coating further helps in overcoming the problem of gastric damage during the use of NSAIDs rabeprazole sodium. Selection of polymer is important to achieve more entrapment efficiency and to sustain the release of drug from hydrogel beads. Effect of various formulation variables such as sodium alginate concentration, calcium chloride concentration and curing time of alginate hydrogel beads were studied.
The particle size of the hydrogel beads were found to increase with the increase in sodium alginate and calcium chloride concentration. The swelling time of coated hydrogel beads at pH 1.2 was found to be higher than at pH 7.4. The drug release from the hydrogel beads was affected by the pH of the dissolution medium and results showed more sustained effect in acidic medium (pH 1.2). The results indicated that the more sustained effect with increase in the concentration of sodium alginate and CaCl2.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: We are thankful to Yarrow Chem. Ltd., Mumbai, India for providing the samples of Rabeprazole Sodium, Sodium alginate, Eudragit S100 and HPMC K4M. We also acknowledge the facilities provided by the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences Bhimtal Campus, Bhimtal.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Nil
REFERENCES:
- Ratnaparkhi MP and Gupta JP: Sustained release oral drug delivery system an overview. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research 2013; 2: 11-21.
- Akifuddin SK, Abbas Z, Marihal S, Ranadev AK, Kumar S and Kulkarni R: Preparation, characterization and in-vitro evaluation of microcapsules for controlled release of diltiazem hydrochloride by ionotropic gelation technique. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science 2013; 3(04): 35-42.
- Chein YW: Oral drug delivery and delivery systems, Novel drug delivery systems. Marcel Dekker- Inc, New-York, Edition 2nd, 1992.
- Davis SS: Assessment of gastrointestinal transit and drug absorption. In L. F. Prescott and WS Nimmo, Novel drug delivery and its therapeutic application Chichester. Wiley, UK. 1990: 89-101.
- Seth A, Jack EB and Vivek SD: Colon-targeted oral drug delivery systems: Design trends and approaches. AAP Pharm Sci Tech. 2015; 16(4): 731-741.
- Suneela SD: Colon-specific prodrugs of 4-aminosalicylic acid for inflammatory bowel disease. World Journal of Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(13): 3564-3571.
- Rajpurohit H, Sharma P, Sharma S and Bhandari A: Polymers for colon targeted drug delivery. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sci 2010; 72(6): 689-696.
- Didehban K, Abdi M and Sharif F: Synthesis and Electromechanical evaluation of conductive poly-acrylamide nanocomposite hydrogel. Advance in Polymer Technology. 2016; 35(4): 21561.
- Morii M, Takata H and Fujisaki H: The potency of substituted benz-imidazoles such as E3810, omeprazole, RO 18-5364 to inhibit gastric H+, K+-ATPase is correlated with the rate of acid-activation of the inhibitor. Biochemical Pharmacology. 1990; 39: 661-667.
- Marelli S and Pace F: Rabeprazole for the treatment of acid-related disorders. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2012; 6(4): 423-435.
- Scarpignato C, Gatta L, Zullo A and Blandizzi C: Effective and safe proton pump inhibitor therapy in acid-related diseases - A position paper addressing benefits and potential harms of acid suppression. BMC Medicine 2016; 14: 179.
- Welage LS: Pharmacologic properties of proton pump inhibitors. Pharmacotherapy. 2003; 23: 74S-80S.
- Wedemeyer RS and Blume H: Pharmacokinetic drug interaction profiles of proton pump inhibitors: an update. Drug Safety.2014; 37(4): 201-11.
- Ertesvåg Alginate-modifying enzymes: biological roles and biotechnological uses. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2015; 6: 523.
- Boppana R, Kulkarni RV, Krishna Mohan G, Mutalik S and Aminabhavi TM: In-vitro and in-vivo assessment of novel pH-sensitive interpenetrating polymer networks of a graft copolymer for gastro-protective delivery of ketoprofen. RSC Advance 2016; 6: 64344-64356.
- Soman A, Mathew F, Chacko AJ, Alias M and Poosan GV: Interpenetrating polymer network (Ipn) - hydrogels. The Pharma Innovation. 2014; 3(8): 59-66.
- Iman IS, Nadia AS, Ebtsam MA: Formulation and stability study of chlorpheniramine maleate transdermal patch. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2010: 17-23.
- Naim S, Samuel B, Chauhan B and Paradkar A: Effect of potassium chloride and cationic drug on swelling, erosion and release from κ-carrageenan matrices. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2004; 5(2): 1–8.
- Gupta VK, Hariharan M, Wheately TA and Price JC: European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2001; 51: 241-248.
- Pani NR, Dalai SR, Sahoo SK and Barik BB: Formulation and in-vitro evaluation of alginate beads by ionotropic gelation technique. Indian Drugs. 2007; 44(11): 843-846.
- Bansal D, Gulbakeb A, Tiwari J and Jain SK: Development of liposomes entrapped in alginate beads for the treatment of colorectal cancer. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2016; 82: 687-695.
- Kapoor D, Patel M, Vyas RB, Lad CS and Gujral G: Fabrication and characterization of non steroidal anti-inflammatory alginate beads for sustained release using natural polymer. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2017; 7(2): 77-80.
- Manjanna KM, Rajesh KS, Shivkumar B: Formulation and optimization of natural polysaccharide hydrogel micro-beads of aceclofenac sodium for oral controlled drug delivery. American Journal of Medical Sciences and Medicine. 2013; 1(1): 5-17.
- Hu Y, Chen T, Dong X and Mei Z: Preparation and characterization of composite hydrogel beads based on sodium alginate. Polymer Bulletin. 2015; 72(11): 2857-2869.
- Mutalik S. Anju P, Manoj K and Usha, AN: Enhancement of dissolution rate and bioavailability of aceclofenac: a chitosan-based solvent change approach. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2008; 350: 279-290.
How to cite this article:
Kumar Y, Singh BK, Kumar A and Padiyar RS: Hydrogel based colon targeted delivery of rabeprazole sodium. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2018; 9(5): 1831-38.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(5).1831-38.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
12
1831-1838
434
994
English
IJPSR
Y. Kumar, B. K. Singh, A. Kumar * and R. S. Padiyar
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumaun University Campus, Bhimtal, Uttarakhand, India.
dhariwalaadesh13@gmail.com
01 August, 2017
29 November, 2017
06 January, 2018
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(5).1831-38
01 May, 2018