HYDROTROPIC SOLUBILIZATION: A PROMISING TECHNIQUE TO ENHANCE SOLUBILITY OF POORLY WATER SOLUBLE DRUG LUMEFANTRINE
HTML Full TextHYDROTROPIC SOLUBILIZATION: A PROMISING TECHNIQUE TO ENHANCE SOLUBILITY OF POORLY WATER SOLUBLE DRUG LUMEFANTRINE
S. Agrawal and M. Kasturi*
Department of Pharmaceutics, Swami Vivekanand College of Pharmacy, Khandwa Road, Near Toll Naka, Indore - 452020, Madhya Pradesh, India.
ABSTRACT: Solubility of drug is considered to be one of the crucial parameter to achieve its desired concentration in systemic circulation and better pharmacological response. As most of the drugs available are poorly aqueous soluble, solubility enhancement has become major challenge to the formulators in the product development of many orally administered drugs. Therapeutic response of drug as well bioavailability can be limited by poor aqueous solubility of drugs. Earlier, many techniques have been developed for enhancing solubility of drugs. Apart from those, hydrotropic solubilization is one of the solubility enhancement techniques applicable to enhance solubility of hydrophobic drugs with the use of hydrotropes like sodium benzoate, urea, piperazine etc. In the present investigation Lumefantrine, an anti malarial drug was selected as model drug for the reason it has very low water solubility of 0.009 mg/ml and belongs to BCS Class IV. The key objective of current research work was to enhance aqueous solubility of this drug using hydrotropic solubilization technique. Solubility studies were performed using various concentrations of hydrotropes like sodium citrate, sodium benzoate, etc. The results suggested that solubility of Lumefantrine was increased more than 30 folds when added to 30% sodium citrate solution and marked its importance in pharmaceutical field.
Keywords: |
Lumefantrine, Hydrotropy, Solubility, Sodium benzoate, Solubility enhancement ratio
INTRODUCTION: Formulation plays a prominent role and holds several benefits in drug discovery and development. Therapeutic efficacy of drug preliminarily depends upon the bioavailability of drug which ultimately upon the solubility of drug molecules. Poor aqueous solubility of drugs often causes significant problems in developing formulations showing high bioavailability.
Therefore, solubility is one of the important parameter to be considered in the product development in order to achieve desired concentration of drug in systemic circulation which further gives effective pharmacological response. Currently only 8% of new drug candidates have both high solubility and permeability.
Formerly, several techniques have been developed to enhance the aqueous solubility of poorly water-soluble drugs such as complexation, cosolvency, emulsions, liposomes, particle size reduction, solid state alteration, solid dispersions, prodrugs, salt formation, polymeric micelles, etc. Hydrotropic solubilization is one among those techniques wherein addition of large amount of second solute increases aqueous solubility of another solute.
The term ‘Hydrotropy’ was put forward by Carl Neuberg 1 to describe increase in solubility of a solute by the addition of fairly high concentrations of alkali metal salts of various organic acids. Hydrotropy enhances solubility of drug by many folds with use of hydrotropes like sodium benzoate, sodium citrate, urea, niacinamide etc. and have many advantages like; it does not require chemical modification of hydrophobic drugs, use of organic solvents, or preparation of emulsion system etc 2. Hydrotropic agents are also a type of solubilizers which increase the solubility of poorly water soluble drugs 3. Examples of various hydrotropic agents that are used as excipients in order to increase aqueous solubility of drug are urea, nicotinamide, sodium benzoate, sodium salicylate, sodium acetate, piperazine, nicotinamide, sodium toluate 4 - 13.
Here, Lumafantrine was selected as model drug. Lumefantrine, also known as Benflumetol, is basically a long acting anti-malarial drug which is very effective in treatment of resistant P. falciparum malaria. It is an erythrocytic schizontocide and acts by inhibiting haeme polymerization in the food vacuole of plasmodia. Lumefantrine belongs to BCS Class IV having low water solubility of 0.009 mg/ml. Hence it is necessary to increase the solubility of drug that may further increase bioavailability and also results in reduction of dose. Lumefantrine is generally given in combination therapy with artemether such as Coartem tablets (strength 20/120 mg; artemether / lumefantrine) in order to treat malaria. Here artemether is short acting where as lumefantrine is long acting anti malarial drug.
Keeping this point in view, the present research work is focused to enhance solubility of Lumefantrine using hydrotropic solubilization technique. The effect of hydrotropes like sodium benzoate, sodium citrate, sodium gluconate, ammonium acetate, piperazine, etc. on the solubility of Lumefantrine was investigated.
MATERIALS: Lumefantrine was kindly gifted from Cipla, Pithampur, India. Sodium gluconate, Piperazine anhydrous and L-ascorbic acid were purchased from Molychem, Mumbai, India. Sodium benzoate, Tri-sodium citrate dihydrate were purchased from Rankem, Haryana, India. Sodium salicylate, N, N- dimethyl urea, Pyrogollol, Pyridoxine HCl, Nicotinamide was purchased from Loba Chemie, Mumbai. Urea and Ammonium acetate were purchased from Qualigens, Mumbai, India. All the chemicals and reagents used were of analytical grade.
Experimental Methods:
UV Spectral Studies: Identification of Lumefantrine was done by UV Spectrophotometric method using Shimadzu Spectrophotometer UV-1800 (Shimadzu Corp., Japan). About 20 mg of drug was accurately weighed and dissolved in 200 ml of methanol R by sonication for about 15 minutes. The solution was allowed to cool to room temperature and diluted five times with methanol R. The absorption spectrum of the diluted solution when observed between 275 and 325nm, exhibits a maximum at about 302 nm; the specific absorbance (A 1% 1 cm) is between 314 and 348 14.
Preparation of Calibration Curve of Lumefantrine in 0.1 M methanolic HCl (λmax 332 nm): Standard stock solution of Lumefantrine was prepared by dissolving 100 mg of drug in 100 ml of 0.1 M methanolic HCl (1000 µg/ml). From the above stock solution 10 ml was taken and diluted upto 100 ml in methanolic HCl (100 µg/ml). From the above solution 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 ml was taken and diluted upto 10ml with 0.1M methanolic HCl to get concentrations ranging from 10 to 60 µg/ml of Lumefantrine. Absorbance was noted using UV-VIS Spectrophotometer at λmax of 332 nm against blank (methanolic HCl). Calibration curve values of Lumefantrine in methanolic HCl (λmax 332 nm) were given in Table 1 and also graph plotted was shown in Fig. 2.
IR Analysis: The IR analysis of Lumefantrine sample was carried out using IR Affinity-1 (Shimadzu Corp., Japan). Here, diamond is the preferred choice for most applications because of its robustness and durability. The solid material is placed onto the small crystal area and then the pressure arm is positioned over the crystal/sample area.
Force is applied on to the sample, pushing it onto the diamond surface. Transmittance was measured from wave number 4000 cm-1 to 400-1 applying Happ-Gensel apodization.
Qualitative Solubility Studies: Qualitative solubility analysis for Lumefantrine was done by dissolving 10 mg of drug in 10 ml of solvent (aqueous / non aqueous) taken in conical flask. After shaking, the samples were examined for the presence of any undissolved suspended particles and clarity. The results of qualitative solubility of Lumefantrine in various solvents were reported in Table 3.
Quantitative Solubility Studies: An excess amount of solute is dissolved in 10 ml of selected solvent till saturated solution was obtained. The conical flasks were stoppered and agitated in thermostatically controlled orbital shaker (Tanco, Pitampura, New Delhi, India) at 25 ± 1 °C. After 24 hrs equilibrium was attained and the samples were filtered through Whatman filter paper (No.1). The individual samples were analyzed after suitable dilution to determine concentration of drug dissolved using UV-VIS spectrophotometer 4. The solubility study was carried out in triplicate and the observations were given in Table 4.
pH Dependent Solubility Studies: An excess quantity of drug was added to a series of stoppered conical flasks containing 10 ml of phosphate buffer solutions (of varying pH) until saturated solution was obtained. The flasks were mechanically shaken at room temperature for 24 hrs, in thermostatically controlled orbital shaker (Tanco, Pithampura, Delhi) at 25 ± 1 °C. These suspensions were filtered through Whatman filter paper (No.1). 4 Aliquots of filtrate obtained were diluted with distilled water and analyzed using UV spectrophotometer at 332 nm against blank. The solubility study was carried out in triplicate and the results were shown in Table 5.
Solubility Studies using Hydrotropes: An excess quantity of drug was added to a series of stoppered conical flasks containing 10 ml of hydrotropic solutions until saturated solution was obtained. The flasks were mechanically shaken at room temperature for 12 hrs, in thermostatically controlled orbital shaker (Tanco, Pithampura, Delhi) at 25 ± 1 °C. These suspensions were filtered through Whatman filter paper (No. 1) 4. Aliquots of filtrate obtained were diluted with suitable quantity of required solvent and analyzed using UV spectrophotometer at 332 nm. The solubility study was carried out in triplicate and observations were shown in Table 6.
Solubility Enhancement Ratio Determination: Solubility enhancement ratio is another parameter that determines the extent to which the drug is soluble in a particular solvent compared to that of water. The solubility enhancement ratios for drug in different hydrotropic solutions were calculated and the results were shown in Table 7.
Solubility enhancement ratio was calculated by using following formula:
Solubility enhancement ratio = Solubility in hydrotropic solution / Solubility in water
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
UV Spectral Studies: UV spectroscopic analysis for the drug was performed and the maximum absorption i.e. λmax of Lumefantrine was observed at 332 nm Lumefantrine. UV analysis was carried out using 0.1M methanolic HCl as the drug is not completely soluble in methanol and require acidic environment because it is weakly basic in nature. The drug spectrum was shown in Fig. 1.
FIG. 1: UV SPECTRUM OF LUMEFANTRINE IN 0.1M METHANOLIC HCl
Preparation of Standard Curve of Lumefantrine in 0.1 M methanolic HCl (λmax 332 nm): Calibration curve in of Lumefantrine was plotted using 0.1M methanolic HCl at λmax of 332 nm and the readings were shown in Table 1. The linear standard curve of Lumefantrine including the graph equation was depicted in Fig. 2.
TABLE 1: STANDARD CURVE OF LUMEFANTRINE IN 0.1M METHANOLIC HCl (λmax 332 nm)
Concentration (µg/ml) | Absorbance |
0 | 0 |
10 | 0.339 |
20 | 0.633 |
30 | 0.899 |
40 | 1.19 |
50 | 1.473 |
60 | 1.811 |
FIG. 2: STANDARD CURVE OF LUMEFANTRINE IN 0.1M METHANOLIC HCl (λmax 332 nm)
IR Analysis: The IR Spectra of samples of Lumefantrine were shown in Fig. 3. The characteristic peaks attributable to various functional groups present in drug molecule were recorded in Table 2.
FIG. 3: IR SPECTRUM SPECTRUM OF LUMEFANTRINE DRUG SAMPLE
The following table represents various peaks of different functional groups in Lumefantrine.
TABLE 2: INTERPRETATION OF IR SPECTRUM OF LUMEFANTRINE
Standard peaks (cm-1) | Group | Observed peak (cm-1) |
2200-2000 | O-H stretching | 2050.33 |
2000-1900 | C=C stretching | 1998.25 |
1250-1020 | C-N stretch, aliphatic amines | 1068.56 |
850-700 | C-H bending, aromatic | 839.63 |
850-550 | C-Cl stretch alkyl halide | 752.24 |
The peaks which were observed were in the corresponding range of standard peak for the respective functional group. Hence the results reveal that the sample refers to Lumefantrine structure.
All the peaks values were found to be near the standard values to confirm the purity of the drug molecule.
Qualitative Solubility Studies: The results of qualitative solubility of Lumefantrine shown in Table 3 reveal that the drug is freely soluble in dichloromethane, ethyl acetate and chloroform.
Quantitative Solubility Studies: The quantitative solubility of Lumefantrine determined in different solvents was illustrated in Table 4.
TABLE 3: QUALITATIVE SOLUBILITY OF LUMEFANTRINE IN VARIOUS SOLVENTS
Solvent | Solubility of Lumefantrine |
Water | Practically insoluble |
Ethanol | Slightly soluble |
Methanol | Slightly soluble |
Chloroform | Freely soluble |
Acetone | Soluble |
Ethyl acetate | Freely soluble |
Dichloromethane | Freely soluble |
0.1N HCl | Slightly soluble |
0.1 N NaOH | Practically insoluble |
Phosphate buffer pH7.4 | Sparingly soluble |
TABLE 4: THE QUANTITATIVE SOLUBILITY OF LUMEFANTRINE IN DIFFERENT SOLVENTS
S. no. | Solvent | Solubility* of Lumefantrine |
1 | Water | 0.0092 mg/ml |
2 | Acetone | 7.214 mg/ml |
3 | Chloroform | 19.53 mg/ml |
4 | Ethanol | 2.744 mg/ml |
5 | Methanol | 2.396 mg/ml |
6 | Dichloromethane | 24.582 mg/ml |
7 | Ethyl acetate | 5.422 mg/ml |
*Average of three determinations
pH Dependent Solubility Studies: The pH dependent solubility of Lumefantrine in different phosphate buffers ranging from pH 1.2 to 10 were shown in Table 5. Lumefantrine was found to be more soluble at lower pH indicating basic nature of drug.
TABLE 5: pH DEPENDENT SOLUBILITY OF DRUGS IN PHOSPHATE BUFFERS
Solvent (water and different pH of PB) | Lumefantrine solubility* (mg/ml) |
Water | 0.0092 |
1.2 | 0.152 |
2.2 | 0.128 |
4.6 | 0.102 |
6.8 | 0.097 |
7.4 | 0.084 |
8 | 0.062 |
9 | 0.031 |
10 | 0.022 |
PB indicates Phosphate buffer, *Average of three determinations
Solubility of Lumefantine in water was 0.009 mg/ml and that of in that of pH 1.2 was 0.152 mg/ml and hence solubility of Lumefantrine in pH 1.2 was increased by 17 times.
Solubility Studies using Hydrotropes: Hydrotropes or hydrotropic agents are molecules having planar hydrotropic structure brought into solution by a polar group. Hence it seems rational to propose that molecules with a planar hydrophobic part and a polar group, which is not necessarily anionic, can act as hydrotropic agent 15. The results of hydrotropic solubilization of Lumefantrine were given in Table 6.
TABLE 6: SOLUBILITY OF LUMEFANTRINE IN VARIOUS HYDROTROPES
S. no. | Hydrotropic solution | Solubility* of Lumefantrine in mg/ml | |||
5% (w/v) | 10% (w/v) | 20% (w/v) | 30% (w/v) | ||
1 | Sodium benzoate | 0.0034 | 0.0072 | 0.0136 | 0.0185 |
2 | Sodium salicylate | 0.0017 | 0.0031 | 0.0058 | 0.0076 |
3 | Sodium gluconate | 0.0031 | 0.0068 | 0.0112 | 0.0151 |
4 | Tri-sodium citrate dihydrate | 0.0552 | 0.1059 | 0.1987 | 0.2864 |
5 | Urea | 0.0041 | 0.0089 | 0.0167 | 0.0243 |
6 | N,N- dimethyl urea | 0.0458 | 0.0905 | 0.1812 | 0.2612 |
7 | Ammonium acetate | 0.0035 | 0.0076 | 0.0149 | 0.0212 |
8 | L-ascorbic acid | 0.0017 | 0.0038 | 0.0071 | 0.0112 |
9 | Piperazine anhydrous | 0.0194 | 0.0422 | 0.0798 | 0.1197 |
10 | Pyrogollol | 0.0068 | 0.0148 | 0.0266 | 0.0415 |
11 | Pyridoxine HCl | 0.0025 | 0.0048 | 0.0096 | 0.0144 |
12 | Nicotinamide | 0.0084 | 0.0181 | 0.0352 | 0.0513 |
*Average of three determinations
Among the different hydrotropes used highest solubility of Lumefantrine was found to be in Tri-sodium citrate dihydrate > N, N- dimethyl urea > Piperazine anhydrous > Nicotinamide > Pyrogollol >Urea> Ammonium acetate > Sodium benzoate. Solubility of Lumefantrine in various hydrotropes was also represented in graphical form in Fig. 4.
FIG. 4: SOLUBILITY OF LUMEFANTRINE IN 30% HYDROTROPIC SOLUTIONS
Solubility Enhancement Ratio Determination: Solubility enhancement ratio for Lumefantrine was determined and the results were shown in Table 7.
TABLE 7: SOLUBILITY ENHANCEMENT RATIO OF LUMEFANTRINE IN VARIOUS HYDROTROPIC SOLUTIONS
S. no. | Hydrotropic solution | Solubility enhancement ratio of Lumefantrine | |||
5% (w/v) | 10% (w/v) | 20% (w/v) | 30% (w/v) | ||
1 | Sodium benzoate | 0.3695 | 0.7826 | 1.478 | 2.011 |
2 | Sodium salicylate | 0.1848 | 0.3369 | 0.6304 | 0.8261 |
3 | Sodium gluconate | 0.3369 | 0.7391 | 1.2173 | 1.6413 |
4 | Tri-sodium citrate dihydrate | 5.722 | 11.51 | 21.597 | 31.13 |
5 | Urea | 0.4456 | 0.9674 | 1.8152 | 2.641 |
6 | N,N- dimethyl urea | 5.1956 | 10.597 | 20.565 | 30.565 |
7 | Ammonium acetate | 0.3804 | 0.8261 | 1.619 | 2.3043 |
8 | L-ascorbic acid | 0.1847 | 0.4130 | 0.7717 | 1.217 |
9 | Piperazine anhydrous | 2.1087 | 4.5869 | 8.6739 | 13.010 |
10 | Pyrogollol | 0.7391 | 1.6087 | 2.8913 | 4.5108 |
11 | Pyridoxine HCl | 0.2717 | 0.5217 | 1.0434 | 1.5652 |
12 | Nicotinamide | 0.9130 | 1.9674 | 3.8260 | 5.5760 |
Solubility of Lumefantrine was enhanced in 30% hydrotropic solutions of Tri-sodium citrate dihydrate, N, N- dimethyl urea, Piperazine anhydrous, Nicotinamide, Pyrogollol, Urea, Ammonium acetate and Sodium benzoate. For Lumefantrine, the highest solubility was observed in 30% Tri-sodium citrate dehydrate solution and the solubility enhancement ratio was observed as 31.13 compared to that of water.
CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that the concept of hydrotropic solubilization technique is novel, safe, eco-friendly and economic for enhancing bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs. Actually, low aqueous solubility was the major concern for Lumefantrine; hence by the use of hydrotropic solubilization technique not only solubility, dissolution rate increased but also there would be good scope of increase in bioavailability of Lumefantrine.
As a result, daily dose, frequency of administration as well other side effects related to Lumefantrine would be minimized to a great extent.
The solubility studies revealed that the solubility of drug was increased more than 30 folds when added to 30% Tri sodium citrate dihydrate solution and marked its importance in pharmaceutical field.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The authors are grateful to Department of Pharmaceutics, Swami Vivekanand College of Pharmacy for providing the facilities to perform research work and they also declare that they have no conflict of interest.
FUNDING: The authors are very thankful to MPCST (M.P. Council of Science and Technology), Bhopal for funding this project work.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES:
- Neuberg C: Hydrotropy. Biochem Z 1961; 76: 107-109.
- Purwa J, Achhrish G, Shweta S and Meghal P: Solubility enhancement techniques with special emphasis on hydrotrophy. International Journal of Pharma Professional’s Research 2010; 1(1): 34-45.
- Gayakwad PS, Gavit AJ, Rajput PV, Bari MM, Barhate SD and Maheshwari RK: formulation development and evaluations of an aqueous injection of gatifloxacin by novel mixed solvency technique. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 2014; 3(4): 1642-1664.
- Agrawal S, Pancholi SS, Jain NK and Agrawal GP: Hydrotropic solubilization of nimesulide for parenteral administration. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2004; 274(1-2): 149-155.
- Girishpai K, Divya S, Sreenivasa RM, Lalit K and Vamshi KT: Solubility Enhancement of Norfloxacin by Hydrotropy Technique. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2014; 6(8): 395-397.
- Jaya S, Umadevi SK, Sai V, Manisha L, Rajeswari G and Kasturibai B: Solubility enhancement of candesartan cilexetil by using different hydrotropic agents. European Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research 2015; 2(1): 339-353.
- Jayakumar C, Antony BM, Arunodhaya N and Nagendra GN: Solubility enhancement of theophylline drug using different solubilization techniques. International Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Sciences 2012; 2(1): 7-10.
- Shravan KP, Dinesh K, Amol PW and Avinash SD: Solubility enhancement of ibuprofen using hydrotropic agents. International Journal of Pharmacy and Life Sciences 2012; 2(2): 542-545.
- Bhavesh K, Vijay S, Bhagirath K and Chetan D: Enhanced solubility study of candesartan cilexitil using different hydrotropic agent. Pharma Science Monitor 2013; 4(3): 405-411.
- Shikha A and Madhavi K: Hydrotropic solubilization technique to challenge the solubility of poorly water soluble drug valsartan. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 2016; 5(8), 833-845.
- Jayakumar C, Antony BM, Arunodhaya N and Nagendra GN: Solubility enhancement of theophylline drug using different solubilization techniques. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Science 2012; 2(1): 7-10.
- Asija R, Kalariya N and Asija S: Enhanced solubility study of sulphasalazine using different solubilization techniques. International Research Journal of Pharmacy 2012; 3(8): 187-190.
- Dahima R and Gangwal S: A comparative study of solubility enhancement of enalapril using formulation of solid dispersion and using hydrotropic solubilization technique. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences 2013; 4(4): 1301-1305
- Lumefantrine: Final text for addition to The International Pharmacopoeia, WHO 2008; 1-5. Available from: http://www.who.int/medicines/publications/pharmacopoeia/Lumef_monoFINALQAS06_186_July08.pdf
- Saleh AM and El-Khordagui LK: Hydrotropic agents: a new definition. International Journal of Pharmacy 1985; 24(2): 231-238.
How to cite this article:
Agrawal S and Kasturi M: Hydrotropic solubilization: A promising technique to enhance solubility of poorly water soluble drug lumefantrine. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2018; 9(1): 175-81.doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(1).175-81.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
20
175-181
542
1882
English
IJPSR
S. Agrawal and M. Kasturi*
Department of Pharmaceutics, Swami Vivekanand College of Pharmacy, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
madhavi2386@gmail.com
01 December, 2016
19 December, 2017
23 December, 2017
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.9(1).175-81
01 January, 2018