IN-SILICO ADMET PREDICTION ON PHYTOCHEMICAL COMPONENTS OF CITRUS SINENSIS
HTML Full TextIN-SILICO ADMET PREDICTION ON PHYTOCHEMICAL COMPONENTS OF CITRUS SINENSIS
Smita Singh and Nehal Nabya *
Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Rama University Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
ABSTRACT: Citrus sinensis are treasuries to deliver novel drugs and a significant aromatic medicinal plant reported to possess a broad spectrum of medicinal uses. The compounds present in these plants can deliver the potential therapeutic drug. A free web tool, SWISS ADME predictor, was used to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness, and medicinal chemistry friendliness of phytoconstituents under investigation. The in-silico study has been deployed to screen the phytochemical components D-limonene, α-pinene, and β-pinene in Citrus sinensis. Against the protein target of RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase and Spike receptor binding domain with the aid of AutoDockVina software. All calculations for protein-fixed ligand-flexible docking were done using the Lamarckian Genetic Algorithm (LGA) method and analyzed using BIOVIA Discovery Studio 2016.13. The Phytoconstituents also showed good hydrophilic-lipophilic balance, good bioavailability, and decent GI absorption. The results obtained after docking showed a good binding affinity and implicated the active phytoconstituents for drug discovery and development.
Keywords: In-silico, Citrussinensis, AutoDock, Binding energy, Phytoconstituents, ADME/T, Molecular docking
INTRODUCTION: The Citrus species are an inherent source of valuable essential oil that might possess various pharmacological actions. One such species, Sweet Orange (Citrus sinensis), is an important source of phytochemicals such as phenolics, vitamin C and carotenoids rich in vitamin C and a hesperidium, belongs to the Rutaceae family 1. These compounds, also known as nutraceuticals, provide health benefits due to a risk reduction of chronic illnesses such as cancer and cardiovascular disease 2, 3. The essential oil from the leaves and fruits consists of various phytoconstituents, including D-limonene, α-pinene, β-pinene, β-Myrcene, etc. 6, 7, 8.
These constituents are reported to possess Antioxidant, Anticancer, Antibacterial, and Antiviral properties 9, 10, 11. The current study is aimed to explore the antiviral potential of components, namely D-limonene, α-pinene, and β-pinene, with target protein RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase (RdRp) by adopting computational (in-silico) approaches 4, 5. Further evaluation of dug-likeness involves predicting ADMET (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, toxicity) properties. In-silico HIA (Human Intestinal Absorption) model and skin permeability model can predict potential drugs for oral delivery and transdermal delivery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Drug Likeness Properties and ADME Screening of Phytoconstituents: Since most herbal medicines are taken orally, an in-silico combining a model of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) was used to screen the phytoconstituents that are biologically active by oral administration. A free web tool, SWISS ADME predictor was used to evaluating the pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness, and medicinal chemistry friendliness of phytoconstituents under investigation.
Drug Likeness Property: molecular weight <500g/mol, hydrogen bond donors<5 Acceptor< 10 rotatable bonds <10 were chosen as criteria to satisfy.
Lipophilicity and Hydrophilicity: Log P and S prediction programs (ILOGP, XLOGP3, WLOGP, ESOL, and SILICOS-IT).
Further, the chemical compound with anticancer and antiviral activity of Citrus sinensis 34 compounds was screened from Dr. Duke’s Phytochemical and ethnobotanical data (http://ars-grin.gov/duke/). The mol formats collected from Chemspider (http:// Chemspider.com). The ADMET properties, which evaluate drug-likeness and toxicity for all compounds, were predicted using TOPKAT (Toxicity Prediction by Komputer Assisted Technology) to check the mutagenicity and probability values of the compounds.
Retrieval and Preparation of Protein Structures: The three-dimensional/crystal structures of protein targets RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase (RdRp) (PDB ID: 6M71) and Spike receptor binding domain (PDB ID: 6M0J) were obtained from Protein Data Bank. The water molecules, cofactors, and other ligands were removed through Molegro molecular viewer and used for molecular docking studies.
Preparation of Ligands for Docking: The 3D structures of chemical constituents from Citrus sinensisviz., D-limonene, α-pinene, β-pinene, were retrieved from the PubChem compound database (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) in SDF format and converted into PDB format using BOVIA Discovery studio Visualiser 2016. Energy minimization was done using Open babel version 2.4.1.
FIG. 1: FRUITS, LEAVES AND WHOLE PLANT OF C. SINENSIS
FIG. 2: (A) D- LIMONENE (B) Α-PINENE (C) Β-PINENE
Detection of Binding site and Validation: The interaction between the amino acids and ligands is considered the active binding sites in the main protease.
TABLE 1: AMINO ACID RESIDUES IN THE BINDING SITE
Target protein | Binding site residues |
RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase | TRP509, LEU371, PHE368, ALA375, LEU372, TYR515, PHE506 |
Spike receptor binding domain | GLU435, GLU430, THR434, PHE428, ASN290, ILE291, PRO289, PRO415, THR414, LYS541, HIS540, PHE438 |
Molecular docking Analysis: Binding mode and interaction of individual bioactive constituents of Citrus sinensis was performed using AutoDockVina software. Docking was performed to obtain a population of possible conformations and orientations for the ligand at the binding site. The protein was loaded in PyRx software, creating a PDBQT file that contains a protein structure with hydrogens in all polar residues. All bonds of ligands were set to be rotatable. All calculations for protein-fixed ligand-flexible docking were done using the Lamarckian Genetic Algorithm (LGA) method and analyzed using BIOVIA Discovery Studio 2016.13.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The results obtained from the SWISS ADME predictor indicated that the value of Log P, molar refractivity, and the total polar surface area in these phytoconstituents was in excellent agreement with Lipinski’s rule of drug-likeness.
The Phytoconstituents also showed good hydrophilic-lipophilic balance, good bio-availability and decent GI absorption. Molecular docking of target proteins, namely main protease, spike protein, and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, was carried out with phytoconstituents using Autodock Vina software.
TABLE 2: CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF LIGANDS
Compound | Log P (iLOGP) | Log S (ESOL) |
D-limonene | 2.63 | -3.51 |
α-pinene | 2.59 | -3.31 |
β-pinene | 2.58 | -3.34 |
Molecular weight (g/mol) : 136, No. of hydrogen bond donors, acceptors and rotatable bonds: 0, Total Polar Surface Area (A°) : 0 |
Analysis of molecular docking revealed D-Limonene, a major phytoconstituents from Citrus sinensis. To be the most promising inhibitor of targets. The results also implicated that other phytoconstituents α-pinene, β-pinene, and Camphene also showed significant interaction with RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase (-5.4,-5.4 and -5.5 kcal/mol, respectively) and with Spike protein (-5.0,-4.8 and -4.8 kcal/mol). Also, bioactive compounds' binding energies were nearly similar to that of standard drugs. The above results implicate the antiviral activity of medicinal plants.
TABLE 3: PHYTOCONSTITUENTS OF CITRUS SINENSIS (BINDING ENERGY AND LIGAND INTERACTION)
For ADMET prediction of phytochemicals in Citrus sinensis, 13 and 21 were screened for anticancer and antiviral activity, respectively Table 4. The screened compounds from Dr. Duke's Phytochemical and Ethnobotanical database were energy minimized and studied for Lipinski’s rule of five Table 4.
TABLE 4: SCREENING OF COMPOUNDS FROM DATABASE PLANT
Citrus
sinensis |
ANTICANCER ACTIVITY | ANTIVIRAL ACTIVITY |
Alpha-Carotene, Alpha-Terpineol, Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene, Butyric-Acid, Caffeic-Acid, Chlorogenic Acid, Diosmin, Ferulic acid, Limonene, Naringenin, Neohesperidin, Rutin | Alpha-Pinene, Ascorbic acid, Beta-sitosterol, Caffeic acid, Caffeine, Chlorine, , Geranial, Hesperidin, Limonene, Linalool, Lithium, Myricetin, Naringenin, Naringin, Neryl-acetate, P-cymene, Quercetin, Rutin, Scutellarein, Stigmasterol, Subaphyllin |
CONCLUSION: Citrus sinensis are treasuries to deliver novel drugs and a significant aromatic medicinal plant reported to possess a broad spectrum of medicinal uses, including antitumor, antioxidant, antibacterial, antiviral activities, etc. The antiviral property of C. sinensis has been reported in many articles. This in-silico study helps to screen the compounds and lead to the development of various diseases; the present study attempted to prove that phytocompound D-Limonene from Citrus sinensis acts as a promising adjunct for drug designing. D-Limonene possesses excellent drug-likeness parameters with zero violations of Lipinski’s Rule and very good ADME pharmacokinetic properties. This implies that the active phytoconstituents, especially D- Limonene of Citrus sinensis. would serve as a supportive measure for the management of this pandemic disease upon further investigation.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT: The authors gratefully acknowledge the constant supervision provided by the Department of Biotechnology, Rama University, Kanpur, U. P., India, for their generous support during the research work.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES:
- Izquierdo L and Sendra JM: Citrus fruits Composition and Characterization. Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition Academic Press, Oxford, UK 2003.
- Diplock AT: Antioxidants and Disease Prevention. Molecular Aspects of Medicine 1994; 15: 293-376.
- Faulks M and Southon S: Carotenoids, metabolism and disease. In: Wildman REC, ed. Handbook of nutraceuticals and functional foods. Boca Raton FL CRC Press 2001; 143–56.
- Mora JR, Iwata M & Von Andrian UH: Vitamin effects on the immune system: vitamins A and D take centre stage. Nature Reviews. Immunology 2008; 8(9): 685–698.
- Chikhale RV: SARS -Cov-2 host entry and replication inhibitors from Indian ginseng: an in-silico approach. Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics 2020; 1–12. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2020.1778539
- Devgan, Kirandeep & Kumar, Nitin & Alam, Singh and Baljit: Development of Sweet Lime (Citrus sinensis.) Pomace Integrated Rice-based Extruded Product. Process Optimization 2018; 55.
- Ayangla NW, Singh N and Kumar A: Phytochemical analysis of plant species of genus Zanthoxylum." International J of Medicine and Pharm Science 2016; 1-8.
- Gautam S: GC-MS analysis of Citrus sinensis. (Sweet lime) peel extract. The Pharma Inno J 2018; 7(6): 01-04.
- Parivuguna V, Doss A and Abhitha B: Anticandidal activity of the leaf extracts of Fragaria virginiana Duchense. and Lantana camara Linn. International Journal of Bio-Technology and Research 2013; 21-26.
- Khan, Ahmed & Mahmood: Phytochemical and pharmacological properties on Citrus sinensis (Mosambi). J of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Res 2016; 555-563.
- Colecio-Juárez MC: Characterization of volatile compounds in the essential oil of sweet lime (Citrus sinensis.) Chilean J of Agri Research 2012; 72: 275-280.
- Othayoth R: Nanophytomedicine and drug formulations. Int J Nanotechnol Appl 2014; 1-8.
- Herowati, Rina & Widodo: Molecular Docking Studies of Chemical Constituents of Tinospora cordifolia on Glycogen Phosphorylase. Procedia Chemistry 2014; 13. 10.1016/j.proche.2014.12.007.
- Astani A & Schnitzler P: Antiviral activity of monoterpenes beta-pineneanD-Limonene against herpes simplex virus in-vitro. Iranian Journal of Microbiology 2014; 6(3): 149–155.
- Nagy MM: Chemical composition and antiviral activity of essential oils from citrusreshni hort. ex tanaka (Cleopatra mandarin) cultivated in Egypt, Journal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants 2018; 21(1): 264-272.
- Gardner PT, White TAC, McPhail DB and Duthie GG: The relative contributions of vitamin c, carotenoids and phenolics to the antioxidant potential of fruit juices. Food Chemistry 2000; 68: 471-474.
- Francis FJ: Wiley encyclopedia of food science and technology. Wiley-Interscience 2000; 4: 2449-2467.
- Ersus S and Cam M: Determination of organic acids, total phenolic content, and antioxidant capacity of sour Citrus aurantium fruits. Chem of Nat Com 2007; 43(5): 607-609.
- Yuan-Chuen W, Yueh-Chueh C and Yu-Hua K: Quantitation of bioactive compounds in citrus fruits cultivated in taiwan. Food Chem 2007; 102: 1163–1171.
How to cite this article:
Singh S and Nabya N: In-silico admet prediction on phytochemical components of Citrus sinensis. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2023; 14(2): 920-23. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.14(2).920-23.
All © 2023 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
44
920-923
981 KB
295
English
IJPSR
Smita Singh and Nehal Nabya *
Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Rama University Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
nabya.nehal@gmail.com
12 June 2022
22 July 2022
04 August 2022
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.14(2).920-23
01 February 2023