IN-VITRO ANTI-DIABETIC, ANTIOXIDANT AND ANTI-APOPTOTIC EFFECTS OF SELECTED INDIAN MEDICINAL PLANTS USING RINM5F CELLS
HTML Full TextIN-VITRO ANTI-DIABETIC, ANTIOXIDANT AND ANTI-APOPTOTIC EFFECTS OF SELECTED INDIAN MEDICINAL PLANTS USING RINM5F CELLS
Munshi *, F. Panchal, D. Shinde, B. Dalal and A. Shankarkumar
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, T. N. Medical College & B. Y. L. Nair Ch. Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
ABSTRACT: The major pathogenic mechanisms of diabetes are chronic hyperglycemia and glucotoxicity. Excess production of reactive oxygen species due to hyperglycemia results in oxidative stress and changes in mitochondrial energy metabolism promote β cell dysfunction, eventually leading to apoptosis and the development of diabetic complications. Although several oral antihyperglycemic agents are available, their adverse effect profile affects their prolonged use. Medicinal plants, having a low toxicity profile, are being looked at as alternatives for diabetes treatment. The present study was thus planned to elucidate the mechanisms of action of 5 medicinal plantsviz. Azadirachta indica, Momordica charantia, Gymnema sylvestre, Syzygium cumini, and Trigonella foenum graecum selected on the basis of Ayurveda in diabetes using RINm5F cells. The effects of these plants on Streptozotocin (STZ) induced oxidative stress was assessed using variables like lipid peroxidation in terms of malondialdehyde (MDA) release, modulation of apoptosis, cell cycle analysis using flowcytometry, and insulin release using commercially available rat insulin Elisa kits. All the plant extracts in the presence of STZ inhibited the release of MDA as compared to STZ-treated cells. Maximum reduction was observed with Azadirachta indica and Gymnema sylvestre extracts compared to STZ treated cells, suggesting the ability to protect from cell death. Maximum and significant insulin release was observed at 200 µg/ml of Syzygium cumini followed by Gymnema sylvestre and Momordica charantia as compared to STZ treated cells. Our findings demonstrate that these plants have the potential to modulate diabetic conditions through their anti-oxidant property, anti-apoptotic and cytoprotective actions.
Keywords: Diabetes, Indian medicinal plants, In-vitro, Antioxidant, Apoptosis, Insulin
INTRODUCTION: Diabetes mellitus is a serious metabolic disorder characterized by hyperglycemia resulting from either a defect in insulin secretion or insufficiency of insulin. Type 1 Diabetes mellitus (insulin-dependent) is caused due to the functional loss of insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreatic islets of Langerhans.
Type 2 Diabetes mellitus (insulin-independent) is the more common form of diabetes, accounting for 90-95% of cases resulting from insufficient insulin production or insulin resistance 1. According to the World Health Organization, diabetes was the 9th leading cause of death, with an estimated 1.5 million deaths directly caused by diabetes 2.
In 2021, 537 million cases of diabetes were reported worldwide and are likely to increase up to 783 million by 2045 1. Oxidative stress plays a pivotal role in Diabetes mellitus. Increased oxidative stress leads to the enhancement of lipid peroxidation in the diabetic state.
Lipid peroxidation is enhanced due to increased oxidative stress in the diabetic condition. Overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated due to hyperglycaemia causes oxidative stress and changes in mitochondrial energy metabolism, which promotes β cell dysfunction, eventually leading to apoptosis and diabetic complications. Diabetes causes significant morbidity and mortality due to microvascular and macrovascular complications and demands a multi-therapeutic approach 3. Several therapies are currently available for diabetes including insulin and various oral antidiabetic agents such as sulfonylureas, biguanides and glinides 4-6.
Metformin, thiazolidinediones, acarbose, miglitol, glibenclamide etc are commonly used antidiabetic drugs to achieve better glycaemic regulation. Many of these oral antidiabetic agents show several adverse effects such as nausea, abdominal pain, abnormal weight gain, allergic reaction, dark urine and complications in pregnancy; therefore, considering these ide effects of the synthetic drugs, research on exploring more effective and safer hypoglycaemic agents with ‘fewer’ lesser side effects is still a challenge 7. Medicinal plants have a low toxicity profile with minimal or no side effects; therefore, they are being looked at for the treatment of diabetes. Several medicinal plants have been described as having antidiabetic, anti-hyperglycaemic, and antioxidant properties. The anti-hyperglycaemic effects of plants are often due to their ability to improve the performance of the pancreatic tissue by causing an increase in insulin secretion or inhibiting the intestinal absorption of glucose.
According to ethnobotanical information, about 800 plants may possess antidiabetic potential, whereas ethnopharmacological surveys suggest that more than 1200 plants used in traditional medicine systems exhibit hypoglycaemic properties 8, 9. Azadirachta indica, Momordica charantia, Gymnema sylvestre, Syzygium cumini, and Trigonella foenum graecum are 5 such plants that are known to possess anti-hyperglycaemic and antioxidant properties 10-14. Aqueous and ethanol extracts of Momordica charantia and Azadirachta indica have previously been shown to have an antihyperglycemic effect in STZ or alloxan-induced diabetic rats 15-19. Seeds of Trigonella foenum graecum have demonstrated hypoglycemic and hypocholesterolemic effects in animal models 20, 21. The seeds of Syzygium cumini have been reported to have potent antimicrobial, antioxidant activity due to the presence of gallic and ellagic acids 22, 23. However, the mechanism by which these plants exert their protective effects on the progression of ‘Diabetes mellitus (DM)’ remains unknown (especially pancreatic β-cell mass). Therefore, the present study was undertaken with the objective to evaluate the potential of these 5 medicinal plant extracts on STZ-induced oxidative damage using RINm5F cells. The effects of these plants on streptozotocin (STZ) induced oxidative stress was assessed using variables like lipid peroxidation in terms of malondialdehyde (MDA) release, modulation of apoptosis, cell cycle analysis, and insulin release.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Chemicals: All the chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma (St Louis, MO, USA). Antibiotic mixture & serum supplement were obtained from HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. Cell culture media was purchased from Gibco Life technologies.
Study Drugs: Aqueous (Aq), hydroalcoholic (HA), and alcoholic (Al) extracts of the selected 5 plants viz., Azadirachta indica, Momordica charantia, Syzygium cumini, Trigonella foenum graecum, and Gymnema sylvestre were obtained directly from Nashik. A certificate of analysis was obtained along with the plant material. Quality control of plant material was carried out as per WHO guidelines. A concentration range from 2.5µg/ml to 200µg/ml was selected for the various assays. Aqueous extracts of all plants and hydroalcoholic extract of Azadirachta indica were dissolved in distilled water and further diluted in RPMI, a cell culture medium. Alcoholic and hydroalcoholic extracts of the remaining 4 plants were dissolved in Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and further diluted in a cell culture medium to achieve the required concentrations. Glibenclamide was used as the standard drug and dissolved in DMSO.
Cell Culture: The rat insulinoma cell line (RINm5f) was purchased from the National Centre of Cell Sciences (NCCS), Pune. Cells were grown in poly-L-lysine coated 75cm2 flasks in RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 100 units/ml of penicillin, 100µg/ml streptomycin, and 10% fetal bovine serum maintained in humidified incubator in the presence of 5% CO2 at 37°C. Cells were cultured to 80 % confluence and used for further analysis.
An in-vitro assay using RINm5F Cell Line:
Viability Assay: The viability assay of the various plant extracts and standard drug-using RIN cells was carried out using MTT assay. RIN m5F cells of 1×105 were seeded in 96 well microplates and incubated at 37°C overnight. After 24 h, the cells were treated with the various plant extracts at concentrations ranging from 2.5µg/ml to 200µg/ml and the plate was incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Following incubation, the cells were treated with 5mg/ml of MTT dye and the plate was further incubated for 4 h at 37 °C. The plate was removed after 4 h and 1N HCL: Isopropanol (1:24) was added in each well to dissolve the purple formazan crystals. The absorbance was measured by using ELISA reader at 550nm.
Lipid Peroxidation Assay: Lipid peroxidation was measured to assess the oxidative damage in terms of Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and expressed as nmoles/mg of protein. The MDA release from RIN cells treated with STZ was determined by Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances (TBARS) method. Briefly, 2 x 106 cells/ml of RIN-5F cell line were seeded with a complete medium of RPMI 1640 and 10% FBS in a 24-well plate. The cells were then treated with different concentrations of the plant extracts and standard anti-diabetic drug in the presence/absence of STZ (5mM), and the plate was then further incubated for 24hours. After the treatment, the cells were trypsinized and re-suspended in 1ml of ice-cold Phosphate-Buffered-Saline (PBS). 0.5ml of the cell suspension was used for MDA estimation and the remaining 0.5ml for protein estimation.
The assay mixture contained 0.5ml of cell suspension, 0.5ml of 0.5 M KCl in 10mM tris HCl, 0.5ml of 30% Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and 0.5ml of 52mM Thiobarbituric acid (TBA). The assay mixture was heated at 80°C for 50 minutes, and after cooling, the mixture was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. The absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 532 nm using a spectrophotometer. These concentrations of MDA were extrapolated from the standard curve constructed with 1,1,3,3-tetraethoxypropane. The cell protein concentration in the remaining cell suspension was determined by Folin Lowry method, and the protein concentrations were extrapolated from the standard curve constructed with Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA).
Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Analysis: To investigate the anti-apoptotic potential of 5 selected medicinal plant extracts on RINm5f cell line, Annexin V and Propidium Iodide (PI) double staining was performed to assess possible induction of cell death with STZ. RINm5f cells were treated with different plant extracts with/without STZ(2mM) and apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry. Annexin V+/PI+ - was determined as apoptosis.
Measurement of Annexin V-fluorescein Isothiocyanate (FITC) Apoptosis: Cells (1×105) were seeded in 24 well plates. After 48 h, cells were treated with different concentrations of drugs with and without STZ. After 72 h, control, i.e., untreated cells and STZ treated cells, were trypsinized, washed in PBS, and re-suspended in Annexin binding buffer. 5µl of Annexin V FITC and 5µl of Propidium Iodide (PI) was added to the cell suspension and incubated in the dark for 15 minutes at room temperature. The cells were then washed with Annexin V Binding buffer and centrifuged at 311 × g for 10 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was then decanted. The cells were re-suspended in Annexin V binding buffer, and the cells were fixed on ice with 2% Formaldehyde for 10 min. The cells were washed twice with PBS and were centrifuged at 393 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The pellet was re-suspended in RNAase A and incubated for 15min at 37 0C. Apoptosis was measured immediately on the Image Stream platform (Amnis Corporation, EMD Millipore).
Cell Cycle Analysis: Cells (1×105) were seeded in 24 well plates. After 48 hours, cells were treated with different concentrations of drugs with and without STZ. After treatment, the cells were trypsinized and centrifuged at 311 × g for 10 min at 4°C and decant the supernatant. Lysing buffer (100mM Tris HCL, 154mM NaCl, 1mM CaCl2, 0.5mM MgCl2, 0.1% NP 40, 50µg/ml Propidium Iodide, 40µg/ml RNAase) was added to the cell pellet. Propidium Iodide (50µg/ml) and RNAase (40µg/ml) were added to the lysing solution. The lysing solution containing the cells was incubated in the dark at room temperature for 15 min. The stained cells are then acquired through the Flow cell of the Flow cytometer. These stained cells were acquired using the Cell Quest Pro software of the Flow Cytometer.
Insulin Secretion Assay: Insulin secretion was studied to assess the effect on functional damage, the cell supernatant was collected and insulin secretion was measured using a rat insulin ELISA kit.
Statistical Analysis: The results were analyzed for statistical significance by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s post hoc test using the Graphpad Instat software (version 3.06). All data were expressed as Mean ± SD values. In all analyses, a p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS:
Effect of Selected Plant Extracts on Viability of RINm5f Cells: Viability studies were performed using MTT assay to eliminate the cytotoxic doses of plant extracts from further study. The concentrations studied ranged from 2.5 to 200µg/ml.
As depicted in Fig. 1, the aqueous, hydroalcoholic, and alcoholic extracts of all 5 plants did not affect the viability of RIN cells when compared to the untreated, and DMSO-treated RIN cells.
FIG. 1: EFFECT OF PLANT EXTRACTS ON VIABILITY OF RIN CELLS (N=3
Further, the anti-diabetic mechanisms of action of the selected plant extracts at 50, 100 and 200 µg/ml were elucidated against beta-cell damage induced by STZ by exploring their role on lipid peroxidation, intracellular DNA damage and insulin secretion. The effect of selected plant extracts was compared with glibenclamide, a standard anti-diabetic drug, and with control cells and STZ treated cells.
Effect of Select Plant Extracts on Lipid Peroxidation: The effect of selected plant extracts on anti-oxidant mechanism was explored by evaluating Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, a marker used to assess lipid peroxidation. The results of MDA release from RINm5F cells in the presence or absence of STZ on the selected plant extracts are depicted in Fig. 2. As expected, RINm5f cells, when treated with STZ, caused a significant increase in MDA level compared to untreated or control cells. A significant decrease was observed when the cells were treated with glibenclamide alone and in the presence of STZ compared to STZ-treated cells. All the plant extracts in the presence of STZ inhibited the release of MDA as compared to STZ-treated cells or DMSO and STZ-treated cells.
FIG. 2: FIG. 2: EFFECT OF SELECT PLANT EXTRACTSON MDA LEVELS. Results expressed as Mean ± SD @@@p<0.001 as compared to cells; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001 as compared to cells + STZ; δδp<0.01; δδδp<0.001 as compared to Cells + DMSO; $p<0.05; $$p<0.01; $$$p<0.001 as compared to Cells + DMSO + STZ
Effect of Selected Plant Extracts on Intracellular DNA Damage: Streptozotocin treatment causes pancreatic beta cells to enter apoptosis which represents an essential step in the molecular mechanism of the diabetogenic effect of STZ. Hence the effect of STZ on RIN cells was evaluated for apoptosis and cell cycle analysis using Flow cytometry.
Apoptosis: As shown in Fig. 3, a significant increase in the percentage of cells undergoing apoptosis was observed with 5mM STZ treatment for 24 h compared to control cells. Pre-treatment with the plant extracts at a 200 µg/ml concentration resulted in a significant reduction in apoptotic cell death in STZ-treated cells, suggesting protection from cell death by the extracts except for Momordica charantia and Syzygium cumini. Maximum reduction was observed with the plant extracts of Azadirachta indica and Gymnema sylvestre compared to STZ-treated cells. This reduction was greater than that seen in cells treated with standard drug i.e., glibenclamide.
HA & alcoholic extracts of Momordica charantia, at lower concentrations of 100 µg/ml and 50 µg/ml, respectively, showed a decrease in apoptotic cells.
FIG. 3: EFFECT OF SELECT PLANT EXTRACTS ON APOPTOSIS INDUCED BY STZ IN RINM5F CELLS (N=3). Results are expressed as Mean ± SD @p<0.01,@@p<0.001 as compared to cell control; *p< 0.01, **p< 0.001 as compared to cells +STZ δp<0.01, δδp<0.001 as compared to cells +DMSO; $p<0.01, $$p<0.001 as compared to cells + DMSO + STZ sp<0.01 as compared to cells + Glib; ##p<0.001 as compared to cells + Glib + STZ €p<0.01, €€p<0.001 as compared to cells +50µg/ml; £p<0.01, ££p<0.001 as compared to cells + 50µg/ml + STZ pp<0.01 as compared to cells + 100µg/ml; qp<0.01, qqp<0.001 as compared to cells + 100µg/ml +STZ
FIG. 4: REPRESENTATIVE IMAGES OF APOPTOSIS USING FLOW CYTOMETRY. Quadrant 1: PI positive represent Necrosis; Quadrant 2: Double positive (Annexin V+/PI+) represent late apoptosis; Quadrant 3: FITC positive (Annexin V+/ PI-) represents early apoptosis and Quadrant 4: Double Negative (Annexin V-/ PI-) represent viable cells.
Cell Cycle: The distribution of RIN cells in different cell cycle phases as depicted in Fig. 5 & 6 was analyzed using flow cytometry. STZ treated RIN cells showed a significant increase in the G0G1 phase indicating arrest at this phase with a simultaneous decrease in S and G2M phases. Thus, the accumulation of cells in G1 phase indicates that STZ delayed the progression of cells to the next phase of the cell cycle. However, when the cells were treated with plant extracts and glibenclamide, the percentage of cells in G0/G1, S, and G2M phases were restored similar to untreated cells compared to STZ treated cells.
FIG. 5: EFFECT OF SELECTED PLANT EXTRACTS ON CELL CYCLE ANALYSIS USING FLOW CYTOMETRY. Results are expressed as Mean ± SD @@p<0.01,@@@p<0.001 as compared to cell control; *p< 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p< 0.001 as compared to cells +STZ δp<0.05, δδp<0.01, δδδp<0.001 as compared to cells +DMSO; $p<0.05, $$p<0.01, $$$p<0.001 as compared to cells + DMSO + STZ; sp<0.05, ssp<0.01,sssp<0.001 as compared to cells + Glib; #p<0.05, ##p<0.01,###p<0.001 as compared to cells + Glib + STZ; €€p<0.01, €€€p<0.001 as compared to cells +50µg/ml; £p<0.05, ££p<0.01, £££p<0.001 as compared to cells + 50µg/ml + STZ; ppp<0.01, pppp<0.001 as compared to cells + 100µg/ml; qp<0.05, qqp<0.01, qqqp<0.001 as compared to cells + 100µg/ml +STZ
FIG. 6: REPRESENTATIVE IMAGES OF CELL CYCLE ANALYSIS USING FLOW CYTOMETRY
Effect of Insulin Secretion: Insulin levels were studied to assess the effect on functional damage and are summarised in Table 1.
RIN cells, when exposed to STZ, showed a decrease in insulin release in comparison to untreated control RIN cells. Glibenclamide per se and in the presence of STZ showed an increase in insulin release. However, all the 5 selected plant extracts showed an increase in insulin release per se and in the presence of STZ.
Maximal and significant insulin release was observed at a 200 µg/ml concentration of Syzygium cumini followed by Gymnema sylvestre and Momordica charantia as compared to cells treated with STZ; this increase was higher than that of glibenclamide.
TABLE 1: EFFECT OF SELECTED MEDICINAL PLANT EXTRACTS ON INSULIN LEVEL (N=3)
Group | Insulin µIU/ml | ||
Cell Control | 6.24±0.23 | ||
Cells + STZ | 3.18± 0.31@@@ | ||
Cells + Glibenclamide(Glib) | 5.38± 0.29*** | ||
Cells + Glib + STZ | 5.01± 0.41*** | ||
Concentration of Plant extract | Aqueous (Aq) | Hydroalcoholic (HA) | Alcoholic(Alc) |
Azadirachta indica (Ai) | |||
Cells + Ai 50 µg/ml | 5.87 ± 0.05*** # | Cells + Ai 50 µg/ml | 5.87 ± 0.05*** # |
Cells + Ai 100 µg/ml | 5.28 ± 0.12*** | Cells + Ai 100 µg/ml | 5.28 ± 0.12*** |
Cells + Ai 200 µg/ml | 4.98 ± 0.07*** | Cells + Ai 200 µg/ml | 4.98 ± 0.07*** |
DMSO | - | DMSO | - |
DMSO + STZ | - | DMSO + STZ | - |
Cells + Ai 50 µg/ml + STZ | 5.43 ± 0.15*** | Cells + Ai 50 µg/ml + STZ | 5.43 ± 0.15*** |
Cells + Ai 100 µg/ml + STZ | 5.36 ± 0.23*** | Cells + Ai 100 µg/ml + STZ | 5.36 ± 0.23*** |
Cells + Ai 200 µg/ml + STZ | 5.18 ± 0.48*** | Cells + Ai 200 µg/ml + STZ | 5.18 ± 0.48*** |
Momordica charantia (Mc) | |||
Cells + Mc 50 µg/ml | 5.77± 0.02*** | Cells + Mc 50 µg/ml | 5.77± 0.02*** |
Cells + Mc 100 µg/ml | 5.87± 0.41*** | Cells + Mc 100 µg/ml | 5.87± 0.41*** |
Cells + Mc 200 µg/ml | 6.06± 0.68*** | Cells + Mc 200 µg/ml | 6.06± 0.68*** |
DMSO | - | DMSO | - |
DMSO + STZ | - | DMSO + STZ | - |
Cells + Mc 50 µg/ml + STZ | 5.43± 0.34*** | Cells + Mc 50 µg/ml + STZ | 5.43± 0.34*** |
Cells + Mc 100 µg/ml + STZ | 5.28± 0.56** | Cells + Mc 100 µg/ml + STZ | 5.28± 0.56** |
Cells + Mc 200 µg/ml + STZ | 5.49± 0.34*** | Cells + Mc 200 µg/ml + STZ | 5.49± 0.34*** |
Trigonella foenum graecum (Tfg) | |||
Cells + Tfg 50 µg/ml | 4.43± 0.05 | Cells + Tfg 50 µg/ml | 4.43± 0.05 |
Cells + Tfg 100 µg/ml | 4.39± 0.13 | Cells + Tfg 100 µg/ml | 4.39± 0.13 |
Cells + Tfg 200 µg/ml | 4.83± 0.54 | Cells + Tfg 200 µg/ml | 4.83± 0.54 |
DMSO | - | DMSO | - |
DMSO + STZ | - | DMSO + STZ | - |
Cells + Tfg 50 µg/ml + STZ | 4.18± 0.32 | Cells + Tfg 50 µg/ml + STZ | 4.18± 0.32 |
Cells + Tfg 100 µg/ml + STZ | 4.58± 0.64 | Cells + Tfg 100 µg/ml + STZ | 4.58± 0.64 |
Cells + Tfg 200 µg/ml + STZ | 4.27± 0.38 | Cells + Tfg 200 µg/ml + STZ | 4.27± 0.38 |
Gymnema sylvestre (Gs) | |||
Cells + Gs 50 µg/ml | 5.55 ±0.23 | Cells + Gs 50 µg/ml | 5.55 ±0.23 |
Cells + Gs 100 µg/ml | 5.83 ± 0.02* | Cells + Gs 100 µg/ml | 5.83 ± 0.02* |
Cells + Gs 200 µg/ml | 6.24 ± 0.43** # | Cells + Gs 200 µg/ml | 6.24 ± 0.43** # |
DMSO | - | DMSO | - |
DMSO + STZ | - | DMSO + STZ | - |
Cells + Gs 50 µg/ml + STZ | 5.39 ± 0.05 | Cells + Gs 50 µg/ml + STZ | 5.39 ± 0.05 |
Cells + Gs 100 µg/ml + STZ | 5.61 ± 0.18 | Cells + Gs 100 µg/ml + STZ | 5.61 ± 0.18 |
Cells + Gs 200 µg/ml + STZ | 5.57 ± 0.33 | Cells + Gs 200 µg/ml + STZ | 5.57 ± 0.33 |
Syzygium cumini (Sc) | |||
Cells + Sc 50 µg/ml | 5.88 ± 0.32 | Cells + Sc 50 µg/ml | 5.88 ± 0.32 |
Cells + Sc 100 µg/ml | 6.03 ± 0.04* | Cells + Sc 100 µg/ml | 6.03 ± 0.04* |
Cells + Sc 200 µg/ml | 6.44 ± 0.08** # | Cells + Sc 200 µg/ml | 6.44 ± 0.08** # |
DMSO | - | DMSO | - |
DMSO + STZ | - | DMSO + STZ | - |
Cells + Sc 50 µg/ml + STZ | 5.52 ± 0.47 | Cells + Sc 50 µg/ml + STZ | 5.52 ± 0.47 |
Cells + Sc 100 µg/ml + STZ | 5.66 ± 0.13 | Cells + Sc 100 µg/ml + STZ | 5.66 ± 0.13 |
Cells + Sc 200 µg/ml + STZ | 5.87 ± 0.41 | Cells + Sc 200 µg/ml + STZ | 5.87 ± 0.41 |
Results are expressed as Mean ±SD @@@p<0.001 as compared to control cells *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 as compared to STZ treated cells δp<0.05, δδ p<0.01 as compared to DMSO $p<0.05, $$p<0.01, $$$ p<0.001 as compared to DMSO +STZ treated cells #p<0.05, ##p<0.01, ###p<0.001 as compared to Glib + STZ using ANOVA followed by post hoc test
DISCUSSION: In the present study, RINm5F an insulin-secreting pancreatic beta-cell line, was used as a model to represent pancreatic beta cells. The choice of our model was based on the potential mechanisms by which the selected plants exert their anti-diabetic effect and the feasibility and ease of setting up the model. Diabetic conditions were induced by streptozotocin, a chemical diabetogenic agent which induces experimental diabetes 24 leading to generation of reactive oxygen species. Several in vitro studies have demonstrated that STZ (up to 20mM) induces β cell death by alkylating DNA by activation of poly ADP-ribosylation (PARP) causing DNA damage. Activation of PARP leads to initiate the programmed cell death pathway, resulting in the depletion of cellular NAD+ 25. The present study was thus planned to elucidate the mechanisms of action of 5 medicinal plants selected on the basis of Ayurveda to assess their therapeutic potential in diabetes mellitus and its associated complications. The 5 plants selected are used extensively by traditional medicine practitioners to treat diabetes. However, their mechanism/s of action has not been fully elucidated with the three extracts viz., aqueous, hydroalcoholic, and alcoholic.
The pancreatic beta-cell damage induced by STZ was assessed with respect to oxidative damage in terms of lipid peroxidation, intracellular DNA damage regarding apoptosis, and insulin secretion with respect to functional damage. Glibenclamide is a second-generation sulfonylurea that reduces blood glucose by increasing insulin secretion from pancreatic beta cells and was used as a standard control in the study. Viability studies were initially carried out to eliminate the cytotoxic doses of plant extracts and thereby find out the precise dose range of the extracts for further functional assays.
The MTT assay assayed the viability of RINm5F cells after treatment with the plant extracts. All the 5 plants did not affect the viability of RIN cells up to 200μg/ml. Hence, for all the 5 plants extracts, efficacy studies were carried out using 50, 100 and 200μg/ml concentrations. The effect of the selected plant extracts was evaluated on the selected variables based on therapeutic interest to assess the plants' anti-oxidant, anti-apoptotic and insulin secretagogue effects. Results of all the plants were compared with glibenclamide, the standard drug used to treat diabetes, at a concentration (1μg/ml) extrapolated from the median therapeutic human dose. Lipid peroxidation was evaluated in terms of MDA release to assess the antioxidant potential of the plant extracts. As expected, STZ-treated RINm5f cells showed a significant increase in MDA levels indicating increased oxidative stress. However, treatment with the extracts in the presence of STZ demonstrated that all the extracts of 5 plants inhibited MDA release, therefore, exhibiting antioxidant properties. The results suggested that these plant extracts could effectively protect pancreatic cells by reducing STZ-induced oxidative damage, thereby strengthening the evidence that these plants have antioxidant activity, which could delay the progression of diabetic complications. Based on this evidence, the anti-apoptotic action of all the extracts could be due to inhibition of oxidative stress, possibly due to phenolic phytochemicals present in the extracts 22, 26. These results suggest that phenolic compounds play a significant role in protecting pancreatic cells against oxidative damage. Secondly, the anti-apoptotic potential of these 5 selected plant extracts was evaluated using flow cytometry.
All the plant extracts at a concentration of 200µg/ml per se and in the presence of STZ showed a significant reduction in apoptotic cells except for Syzygium cumini. Our results are in accordance with reported literature 27. The results of all plants were comparable to glibenclamide which also exhibited protection against the apoptotic damage induced by STZ. Further cell cycle analysis results reported that aqueous extract of Trigonella foenum graecum and the hydroalcoholic extract of Momordica charantia showed a significant decrease in the G0/G1 (apoptosis) phase the rest of the extracts.
Hence, the antiapoptotic action of these extracts could be the inhibition of oxidative stress, possibly due to phenolic phytochemicals present in the extracts. The results revealed that the anti-apoptotic property of all the extracts plays a significant role in protecting and maintaining insulin secretion of pancreatic cells. Further, we evaluated the effect of drugs on insulin secretion as damaged pancreatic beta cells lose their capacity for insulin secretion. Significantly high insulin release was observed at a concentration of 200 µg/ml of Syzygium cumini followed by Gymnema sylvestre and Momordica charantia as compared to cells treated with STZ increase was greater than that seen with glibenclamide. Glibenclamide per se showed an increase in insulin secretion. Also, it stimulated insulin release from STZ treated cells, thus confirming its mode of action which is mainly by stimulating the β pancreatic cells. Laha and Ezeigwe et al demonstrated that Gymnema sylvestre and extract of A. indica have pancreatic islet regeneration properties in diabetic mice 13, 19. The potential effects observed when using these extracts can certainly be ascribed to cellular mechanisms, which include scavenging of free radical, DNA repair, cell cycle alteration, programmed cell death mitigation, and the ability to modulate various signaling pathways 28, 29.
CONCLUSION: The present study has exposed the path for research on Indian medicinal plants that have the potential to modulate diabetic conditions through their anti-oxidant, anti-apoptotic and cytoprotective actions. Although the study reveals the possible mechanisms of action of the selected plants, it is essential to confirm all the reported activities further using in vivo models of diabetes and its associated complications. Additionally, isolation and identification of active constituents from these plants will help develop these plants into potential anti-diabetic drugs which can be incorporated in the anti-diabetic drug armamentarium after clinical assessment.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: We are thankful to the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) for their financial support. We would also like to acknowledge Ms. Apurva Takke for her technical support in the project.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES:
- International Diabetes Federation (2021). IDF Diabetes Atlas. 10thAvailable from www.diabetesatlas.org; last accessed on 04th March 2022.
- WHO Factsheets – Diabetes. Available at https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/diabetes; last accessed on 04 March 2022
- Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, Colagiuri S, Guariguata L, Motala AA, Ogurtsova K, Shaw JE, Bright D and Williams R: Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates: results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2019; 157: 107843.
- Davies MJ, D'Alessio DA, Fradkin J, Kernan WN, Mathieu C, Mingrone G, Rossing P, Tsapas A, Wexler DJ and Buse JB: Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2018; 41: 2669–2701.
- American Diabetes Association 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care 2020; 43: 98–110.
- Buse JB, Wexler DJ, Tsapas A, Rossing P, Mingrone G, Mathieu C, D'Alessio DA and Davies MJ: 2019 Update to: Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2020; 43: 487–493.
- Banerjee M, Khursheed R, Yadav AK, Singh SK, Gulati M, Pandey DK, Prabhakar PK, Kumar R, Porwal O, Awasthi A, Kumari Y, Kaur G, Ayinkamiye C, Prashar R, Mankotia D and Pandey NK: A systematic review on synthetic drugs and phytopharmaceuticals used to manage diabetes. Current Diabetes Reviews 2020; 16(4): 340-356.
- Patel DK, Prasad SK, Kumar R and Hemalatha S: An Overview on antidiabetic medicinal plants having insulin mimetic property. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine 2012; 2: 320–330.
- Nwozo S, Adeneye D and Nwawuba S: Effect of Solanium melongena fruits supplemented diet on hyperglycemia, overweight, liver function and dyslipidemia in male New Zealand rabbits fed high fat and sucrose diet. Integrative Obesity and Diabetes 2018; 4(3): 1-5.
- Yarmohammadi F, Mehri S, Najafi N, Salar Amoli S and Hosseinzadeh H: The protective effect of Azadirachta indica (neem) against metabolic syndrome: A review. Iranian J of Basic Medical Science 2021; 24: 280-292.
- Liu Z, Gong J, Huang W, Lu F and Dong H: The effect of Momordica charantiain the treatment of diabetes Mellitus: A Review. Evidence Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2021; 2021: 3796265.
- Alsieni MA, El Rabey HA, Al-Sieni AI and Al-Seeni MN: Comparison between the antioxidant and antidiabetic Activity of Fenugreek and Buckthorn in streptozotocin-induced diabetic male rats. Biomed Research International 2021; 2021: 7202447.
- Laha S and Paul S: Gymnema sylvestre (Gurmar): A Potent Herb with Anti-Diabetic and Antioxidant Potential. Pharmacognosy Journal 2019; 11(2): 201-6.
- Dwivedi N, Trivedi K and Tripathi IP: Antihyperglycemic activity, free radical scavenging activity and FTIR of Syzygium Cumini Linn pulp dried extract. Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination 2020; 11: 420.
- Peter EL, Nagendrappa PB, Kaligirwa A, Ogwang PE and Sesaazi CD: The efficacy and safety of Momordica charantia in animal models of type 2 diabetes mellitus; A systematic review and meta-analysis. Phytotherapy Research 2020; 35(2): 637-656.
- Oyesola OA, Shallie PHD, Osonuga IO, Soetan OA and Owoeye IG: Momordica charantia improves biochemical indices in alloxan-induced diabetic rat model. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 2020; 10(09): 788-794.
- Jiang S, Xu L, Xu Y, Guo Y, Wei L, Li X and Song W: Antidiabetic effect of Momordica charantia saponins in rats induced by high-fat diet combined with STZ. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 2020; 43: 41-47.
- Azeez MO, Ameen SA, Basiru A, Ibrahim D, Akorede GJ and Ambali HM: Hypoglycaemic activity and cardiac autonomic neuropathy amelioration of neem in alloxan-induced diabetic wistar rats. Savannah Veterinary Journal 2020; 3:20-26.
- Ezeigwe OC, Ezennaya CF, Ifedilichukwu NH, Soronnadi VN, Chukwuemeka UV and Alaebo PO: Antidiabetic property and antioxidant potentials of aqueous extract of Azadirachta indica leaves in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. J of Med Plants Studies 2019; 7(6): 18–23.
- Marzouk M, Omar TY and Soliman AM: Antidiabetic and hyperinsulinemic effects of Fenugreek and Termis seeds aqueous extracts in experimental rats. EPH - International Journal of Applied Science 2019; 1(1): 417–428.
- Nagamma T, Konuri A, Nayak CD, Kamath SU, Udupa PE, Nayak Y: Dose-dependent effects of fenugreek seed extract on the biochemical and haematological parameters in high-fat diet-fed rats. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences 2019; 14(4): 383-389.
- Priya SH, Prakasan N and Purushothaman J: Antioxidant activity, phenolic-flavonoid content and high-performance liquid chromatography profiling of three different variants of Syzygium cuminiseeds: A comparative study. Journal of Intercultural Ethnopharmacology 2017; 6(1): 107-114.
- Singh B, Singh JP, Kaur A and Singh N: Insights into the phenolic compounds present in jambolan (Syzygium cumini) along with their health-promoting effects. Int J of Food Science & Technology 2018; 53(11): 2431-2447.
- Goyal SN, Reddy NM, Patil KR, Nakhate KT, Ojha S, Patil CR and Agrawal YO: Challenges and issues with streptozotocin-induced diabetes - A clinically relevant animal model to understand the diabetes pathogenesis and evaluate therapeutics. Chemico-Biological Interactions 2016; 244: 49-63.
- Rose M, Burgess JT, O'Byrne K, Richard DJ and Bolderson E: PARP Inhibitors: Clinical Relevance, Mechanisms of Action and Tumor Resistance. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 2020; 8: 564601.
- Pradeepkiran JA, Nandyala VA and Bhaskar M: Trigonella foenum-graecum seeds extract plays a beneficial role on brain antioxidant and oxidative status in alloxan-induced wistar rats. Food Quality and Safety 2020; 4: 83–89.
- Ramkumar KM, Lee AS, Krishnamurthi K, Devi SS, Chakrabarti T, Kang KP, Lee S, Kim W, Park SK, Lee NH and Rajaguru P: Gymnema montanum protects against alloxan induced oxidative stress and apoptosis in pancreatic β cells. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry 2009; 24: 429-440.
- Omóbòwálé TO, Oyagbemi AA, Adejumobi OA, Orherhe EV, Amid AS, Adedapo AA, Nottidge HO and Yakubu MA: Preconditioning with Azadirachta indica ameliorates cardiorenal dysfunction through reduction in oxidative stress and extracellular signal regulated protein kinase signalling. J of Ayurv and Int Med 2016; 7 (4): 209-217.
- Patel SM, Venkata KC, Bhattacharyya P, Sethi G and Bishayee A: Potential of neem (Azadirachta indica L.) for prevention and treatment of oncologic diseases. Seminars in Cancer Biology 2016;40–41: 100-115.
How to cite this article:
Munshi R, Panchal F, Shinde D, Dalal B and Shankarkumar A: In-vitro anti-diabetic, anti-oxidant and anti-apoptotic effects of selected Indian medicinal plants using rinm5f cells. Int J Pharm Sci & Res 2022; 13(9): 3606-21. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.13(9).3606-21.
All © 2022 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Article Information
25
3606-3621
2511 KB
467
English
IJPSR
R. Munshi *, F. Panchal, D. Shinde, B. Dalal and A. Shankarkumar
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, T. N. Medical College & B. Y. L. Nair Ch. Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
renuka.munshi@gmail.com
19 January 2022
07 March 2022
26 April 2022
10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.13(9).3606-21
01 September 2022